Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-md8df Total loading time: 0.216 Render date: 2021-12-08T07:52:42.541Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

8 - Communications Law

Bits of Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Justin D. Levinson
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, School of Law
Robert J. Smith
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, School of Law
Get access

Summary

Scientists have demonstrated that implicit biases are pervasive, large in magnitude, and have real-world consequences. What can we do about them? One principal strategy is to decrease implicit biases in our minds (the other is to disrupt their causal link to behavior). To decrease bias, we should understand its source. Put crudely, is it nature or nurture? I argue that its source is mostly nurture, and of a specific sort – via vicarious experiences with outgroups mediated by electronic media. These vicarious interactions, fed to us via entertainment, news, social media, and computer-mediated communities, strengthen particular mental associations. If these vicarious experiences are indeed a substantial source of implicit bias, what might policymakers do in the shadow of the First Amendment?

WHERE DOES IMPLICIT BIAS COME FROM?

Nature

Perhaps implicit biases are “hardwired” into our DNA and into our brains as a product of evolution. In support of this position, one might cite research revealing that certain biases are shared by other primates. Consider, for example, the recent work by Neha Mahajan, Mahzarin Banaji, and colleagues, who studied intergroup biases of rhesus macaques, a primate species that diverged from our evolutionary line between twenty-five and thirty million years ago. Deploying an ingenious variation of the Implicit Association Test, the researchers discovered that these monkeys distinguished between photographs of ingroup and outgroup members automatically and stared longer at outgroup monkeys (M = 10.83 s vs. 6.58 s; p = .004). This behavior was consistent with the hypothesis that greater threats would prompt longer stares. Moreover, this longer span of attention could not be explained by unfamiliarity. Even “familiar” monkeys (monkeys that at adolescence had recently exited the ingroup to join an outgroup) prompted longer stares. In addition, the male monkeys (although not females) showed an implicit attitudinal preference in favor of the ingroup: they associated ingroup members more with favorable items (i.e., fruits) and outgroup members more with less favorable items (i.e., spiders; F(5,185) = 3.06, p = .011).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lane, Kristin A.Implicit Social Cognition and the Law 3 2007
Mahajan, NehaThe Evolution of Intergroup Bias: Perceptions and Attitudes in Rhesus Macaques 100 2011
Blair, Irene V.The Malleability of Automatic Stereotype 6 2002
Dasgupta, NilanjanaGreenwald, Anthony G.On the Malleability of Automatic Attitudes: Combating Automatic Prejudice with Images of Admired and Disliked Individuals 81 2001
Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A.Nosek, Brian A.The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations 41 2010
Wittenbrink, B.Spontaneous Prejudice in Context: Variability in Automatically Activated Attitudes 81 2001
2005
1993
Ramasubramanian, SrividyaTelevision Viewing, Racial Attitudes, and Policy Preferences: Exploring the Role of Social Identity and Intergroup Emotions in Influencing Support for Affirmative Action 77 2010
Weisbuch, MaxThe Subtle Transmission of Race Bias via Televised Nonverbal Behavior 326 2009
Dixon, Travis L.Network News and Racial Beliefs: Exploring the Connection Between National Television News Exposure and Stereotypical Perceptions of African Americans 58 2008
Rosenstiel, Tom 1999
Dean, WallyBrady, Lee AnnAfter 9/11, Has Anything Changed? 95 2002
Kang, JerryTrojan Horses of Race 118 2005
Dixon, Travis L.Linz, DanielRace and the Misrepresentation of Victimization on Local Television News 27 2000
Dixon, Travis L.Maddox, Keith B.Skin Tone, Crime News and Social Reality Judgments 35 2006
Gilliam, Jr Franklin D.Iyengar, ShantoPrime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public 44 2000
Williams, The Virtual Census: Representations of Gender, Race and Age in Video Games 11 2009
Kang, JerryCyber-Race 113 2000
Mohammed, Methal R.Cultural Identity in Virtual Reality (VR): A Case Study of a Muslim Woman with Hijab in Second Life (SL) 3 2009
Nakamura, LisaDon't Hate the Player, Hate the Game: The Racialization of Labor in World of Warcraft 26 2009
Eastwick, Paul W.Gardner, Wendi L.Is It a Game: Evidence for Social Influence in the Virtual World 4 2009
Pettigrew, Thomas F.Tropp, Linda R.A Meta-Analytic Test and Reformulation of Intergroup Contact Theory 90 2006
Miller, NormanBrewer, Marilynn B. 1984
Amichai-Hamburger, YairMcKenna, Katelyn Y. A.The Contact Hypothesis Reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet 11 2006
Yee, NickBefriending Ogres and Wood-Elves: Relationship Formation and the Social Architect of Norath 9 2009
Yee, NickBailenson, Jeremy N.The Difference Between Being and Seeing: The Relative Contribution of Self-Perception and Priming to Behavioral Changes via Digital Self-Representation 12 2009
6
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×