Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-lfgmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-26T15:55:11.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Results for transport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Ari Rabl
Affiliation:
Ecole des Mines, Paris
Joseph V. Spadaro
Affiliation:
Basque Centre for Climate Change, Bilbao, Spain
Mike Holland
Affiliation:
Ecometrics Research and Consulting (EMRC)
Get access

Summary

Summary

In this chapter, we illustrate the use of external cost estimates for evaluating transportation options. We begin by presenting damage cost estimates in Section 15.1, with results for the EU and for the USA.

In Section 15.2 we use the damage cost estimates of ExternE to compare a hybrid passenger car with a conventional car on a lifecycle basis. In Section 15.3 we look at walking and bicycling as alternatives to commuting to work by car; here the reduction of air pollution is a significant collective benefit, but much more important is the value of the health gain for the individuals who make the switch to an active transport mode. We present sufficient detail in these two sections to show how the calculations are done.

In Section 15.4 we compare the greenhouse gas emissions of the main transport modes. In Section 15.5 we conclude the chapter with a discussion of policies that can internalize the damage costs of transport, including the low emission zones (LEZ) that have been created in many cities of Europe.

External cost estimates for transport

Vehicle emissions

In the EU the emissions of vehicles must not exceed the limits specified in the EURO standards. As an example Table 15.1 shows the standards for passenger cars. Analogous standards are in force in the USA. The regulations of China, India and Australia are based on the EURO standards, although with different implementation schedules.

These standards are to be respected in actual use, and compliance is determined by testing the vehicle with a standardized test cycle. Developing realistic test cycles is difficult because the emissions vary strongly with driving conditions (cold engine, warm engine, speed, acceleration, etc.). There are always questions about how representative the tests are of typical driving conditions. The EURO standards specify the tests to be used for certifying compliance by vehicle manufacturers. The performance under other conditions can be estimated by using the COPERT 4 software of the European Environment Agency.

Type
Chapter
Information
How Much Is Clean Air Worth?
Calculating the Benefits of Pollution Control
, pp. 581 - 625
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aertsens, J., de Geus, B., Vandenbulcke, G. et al. 2010. Commuting by bike in Belgium, the costs of minor accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42: 2149–2157.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, B. E., Haskell, W. L., Whitt, M. C. et al. 2000. Compendium of Physical Activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2000;32 (Suppl):S498–S516. Google Scholar
AIRPARIF 2009. AIRPARIF Actualité N° 32, February 2009. Paris.
AMM 2003. American Metal Market. .
Andersen, L. B., Schnohr, P., Schroll, M. and Hein, H. O. 2000. All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports and cycling to work. Archives of Internal Medicine 160(11): 1621–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANL 2004. Well-to-wheel analysis. Argonne National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Research. Available at .
Barth, M. and Boriboonsomsin, K. 2009. Traffic congestion and greenhouse gases. ACCESS: the Magazine of University of California Transportation Center, number 35: 2–9.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. A. and Stedman, D. H. 2008. A decade of on-road emissions measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42: 1651–1656.Google Scholar
CE Delft. 2008. Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport Sector. Produced within the study Internalisation Measures and Policies for All external Cost of Transport (IMPACT), Version 1.1. CE Delft, February, 2008.
CE Delft 2011. External Costs of Transport in Europe: Update Study for 2008. CE Delft, Oude Delft 180, 2611 HH Delft, The Netherlands.
Chen, H., Goldberg, M. S. and Villeneuve, P. J. 2008. A systematic review of the relation between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and chronic diseases. Reviews On Environmental Health 23 (4): 243–297.Google Scholar
CONCAWE 1998. A Study of the Number, Size & Mass of Exhaust Particles Emitted from European Diesel and Gasoline Vehicles under Steady State and European Driving Cycle Conditions, CONCAWE Report #98/51, Madouplein 1, B-1210 Brussels, Belgium.
de Hartog, J. J., Boogaard, H., Nijland, H. and Hoek, G. 2010. Do the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks?Environ Health Perspect 118 (8): 1109–1116.Google Scholar
Delucchi, M. A. 2003. A lifecycle emissions model (LEM): lifecycle emissions from transportation fuels, motor vehicles, transportation modes, electricity use, heating and cooking fuels, and materials. UCD-ITS-RR-03–17, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Desaigues, B., Ami, D., Bartczak, A. et al. 2011. Economic valuation of air pollution mortality: a 9 – country contingent valuation survey of value of a life year (VOLY). Ecological Indicators 11(3): 902–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EEA 2008. Climate for a transport change. TERM 2007: indicators tracking transport and environment in the European Union. EEA Report No 1/2008. European Environment Agency.
EQT 2004. Les déplacements des franciliens en 2001–2002. Enquête globale des transports. Plan de Déplacements Urbains. Direction Régionale de l’Equipement Ile-de-France.
ExternE 2000. External Costs of Energy Conversion – Improvement of the Externe Methodology And Assessment Of Energy-Related Transport Externalities. Final Report for Contract JOS3-CT97–0015, published as Environmental External Costs of Transport. Friedrich, R. & Bickel, P., editors. Springer Verlag Heidelberg 2001.
ExternE 2005. ExternE – Externalities of Energy: Methodology 2005 Update.
ExternE 2008. With this reference we cite the methodology and results of the NEEDS (2004–2008) and CASES (2006–2008) phases of ExternE. For the damage costs per kg of pollutant and per kWh of electricity we cite the numbers of the data CD that is included in the book edited by Markandya, A., Bigano, A. and Porchia, R. in 2010: The Social Cost of Electricity: Scenarios and Policy Implications. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham, UK. They can also be downloaded from (although in the latter some numbers have changed since the data CD in the book).
Grange, D. and Host, S. 2012. Pollution de l’air dans les enceintes souterraines de transport ferroviaire et santé. Observatoire Régional de Santé Île-de-France, 43, Rue Beaubourg 75003 Paris. June 2012.
HEATCO 2006. Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment (HEATCO), Deliverable D5: Proposal for Harmonised Guidelines. EC Contract No. FP6-2002-SSP-1/502481. Bickel, P. et al. Stuttgart : IER, Germany, Stuttgart, 2006.
Hickman, J., Hassel, D., Joumard, R., Samaras, Z. and Sorenson, S. 1999. Methodology for calculating transport emissions and energy consumption for the Project MEET Report for Contract ST-96-SC.204 European Commission / DG VII. Transport Research Laboratory, Old Wokingham Road, Crowthorne, RG45 6AU, United Kingdom.
Int Panis, L., de Geus, B., Vandenbulcke, G. et al. 2010. Exposure to particulate matter in traffic: A comparison of cyclists and car passengers. Atmospheric Environment 44: 2263–2270.Google Scholar
Laden, F., Neas, L. M., Dockery, D. W. and Schwartz, J. 2000. Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities. Environmental Health Perspectives – New Series 108 – issue 10: 941–948.Google Scholar
London 2003. The London Low Emission Zone Feasibility Study A Summary of the Phase 2 Report to the London Low Emission Zone Steering Group 2003.
MacLeana, H. L. and Lave, L. B. 2003. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 29: 1–69.Google Scholar
Muller, N. Z. and Mendelsohn, R. 2007. Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54: 1–14.Google Scholar
NRC 2010. Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use. National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, DC. Available from National Academies Press.
OECD 2012. Mortality Risk Valuation in Environment, Health and Transport Policies. OECD Publishing.
Pope, C. A., Hill, R. W. and Villegas, G. M. 1999. Particulate air pollution and daily mortality on Utah’s Wasatch Front. Environmental Health Perspectives 107(7): 567–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabl, A. and de Nazelle, A. 2011. Benefits of shift from car to active transport. Transport Policy 19: 121–131.Google Scholar
Reiss, R., Anderson, E. L., Cross, C. E. et al. 2007. Evidence of health impacts of sulfate- and nitrate-containing particles in ambient air. Inhalation Toxicology 19: 419–449.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J., Norris, G., Larson, T. et al. 1999. Episodes of high coarse particle concentrations are not associated with increased mortality. Environmental Health Perspectives 107(5): 339–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spadaro, J. V. and Rabl, A. 2006. Hybrid Electric vs Conventional Vehicle: Life Cycle Assessment and External Costs. 2nd conference ‘Environment & Transport’ including 15th conference ‘Transport and Air Pollution’. Reims, France, 12–14 June 2006.
Stodolsky, F., Vyas, A., Cuenca, R. and Gaines, L. 1995. Life Cycle Energy Savings Potential from Aluminum-Intensive Vehicles Conference Paper presented at the 1995 Total Life Cycle Conference & Exposition, Vienna, Austria, October 16–19, 1995.
US DHHS 2008. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Office of Public Health and Science, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC 20201.
Vossiniotis, G., Arabatzis, G. and Assimacopoulos, D. 1996. Description of ROADPOL: A Gaussian Dispersion Model for Line Sources, program manual, National Technical University of Athens, Greece.
Weiss, M. A., Heywood, J. B., Drake, E. M., Schafer, A. and AuYeung, F. F. 2000. On the road in 2020: a life-cycle analysis of new automobile technologies. Energy Laboratory Report # MIT EL 00–003, Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts02139–4307.
WHO 2005. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. (accessed 21 June 2010).
WHO 2008. Methodological guidance on the economic appraisal of health effects related to walking and cycling. Health Economic Assessment Tool for Cycling (HEAT for Cycling). User Guide, version 2. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Coperhagen, Denmark.
WHO 2010. Development of Guidance and a Practical Tool for Economic Assessment of Health Effects from Walking. Consensus Workshop, 1–2 July 2010, Oxford, UK. World Health Organization, Europe.
WHO 2013. HRAPIE: Health risks of air pollution in Europe. Recommendations for concentration–response functions for cost–benefit analysis of particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Bonn, Germany.
Woodcock, J., Edwards, P., Tonne, C. et al. 2009. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet 374(9705): 1930–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuurbier, M., Hoek, G., Oldenwening, M. et al. 2010. Commuters’ exposure to particulate matter air pollution is affected by mode of transport, fuel type and route. Environ Health Perspectives 118: 783–789.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×