Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-swqlm Total loading time: 0.193 Render date: 2021-12-03T20:16:59.962Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

2 - The Happy Homeownership Narrative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Mechele Dickerson
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

Americans love the idea of Home Sweet Home. A statement, written more than thirty years ago by a trade association for savings and loans banks, continues to capture this nation’s virtually unconstrained adoration of homeownership:

A family’s home is much more than shelter. A home signifies the family’s accomplishments in life, eloquently expresses its personality, establishes its place in the community, and defines the perimeter of its private and personal stake in society. Indeed, the American dream traces its origins to the very beginning of this country, to the quest of those first colonists for the freedom to rule over their own domain, no matter how small, no matter how meager. This is a dream shared by those who have come to this country, and it is the rightful heritage of all Americans.

Even after enduring the worst housing crisis since the Great Depression, homeownership still remains enormously popular among Americans of all ages, races, and incomes.

For decades, U.S. housing policies have reinforced this rhapsodic view of homeownership. Indeed, for almost eighty years, the U.S. government has provided significant subsidies for people who want to rule over their own domain. U.S. leaders staunchly defend these subsidies based on assumptions and beliefs that collectively form what I will call the “Happy Homeownership Narrative.” In the Happy Homeownership Narrative, homeownership brings out the best in people. It makes them more involved as citizens, and it strengthens the moral and economic fiber of the country. Homeowners are viewed as being noble, hardworking, responsible, and financially stable and secure. In stark contrast, renters are viewed as weak and financially vulnerable. In the Narrative, homeownership creates stronger neighborhoods and improves society overall. Every citizen should strive to become a homeowner. Renting, on the other hand, is a parasitic state that people should aspire to flee from as soon as they possibly can.

Type
Chapter
Information
Homeownership and America's Financial Underclass
Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions
, pp. 19 - 37
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fischel, William A., The Evolution of Homeownership, reviewing The Unbounded Home: Property Values beyond Property Lines, 77 Chic. L. Rev. 1503 (2010)Google Scholar
Green, Richard K. & Wachter, Susan M., The American Mortgage in Historical and International Context, 19–4 J. Econ. Persp. (Fall 2005)Google Scholar
Nelson, William E. & Williams, Norman R., Suburbanization and Market Failure: An Analysis of Government Policies Promoting Suburban Growth and Ethnic Assimilation, 27 Fordham Urb. L.J. 197, 226−31 (1999)Google Scholar
Case, Karl E., Land Prices and House Prices in the United States, in Housing Markets in United States and Japan 30, 31 (1994)Google Scholar
Culhane, Marianne B., No Forwarding Address: Losing Homes in Bankruptcy, in How Debt Bankrupts the Middle Class 133 (Porter, Katherine ed., Stanford University Press) (2012)Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H. & Weber, Eleanor, The Social Benefits of Homeownership, 7–1 Housing Pol’y Debate (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohe, William M. & Stewart, Leslie S., Homeownership and Neighborhood Stability, 7–1 Housing Pol’y Debate (1996)Google Scholar
Boehm, Thomas P. & Schlottmann, Alan M., Does Home Ownership by Parents Have an Economic Impact on Their Children?, 8 J. Hous. Econ.217 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, Thomas P. & Schlottmann, Alan M., Housing and Wealth Accumulation: Intergenerational Impacts, in Low-Income Homeownership: Examining the Unexamined Goal 407 (Retsinas, N. P. and Belsky, E. S. eds., 2002)Google Scholar
Morrow-Jones, Hazel L., Black-White Differences in the Demographic Structure of the Move to Homeownership in the United States, in Ownership, Control, and the Future of Housing Pol’y 52–56 (Hays, R. Allen ed., 1993)Google Scholar
Krueckeberg, Donald, The Grapes of Rent: A History of Renting in a Country of Owners 10–1 Housing Policy Debate9–30 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Been, Vicki et al., Does Losing Your Home Mean Losing Your School?: Effects of Foreclosures on the School Mobility of Children, 41 Regional Science and Urban Economics 407 (2011)Google Scholar
Santiago, Anna Maria et al., The Experiences of Low-Income Homebuyers, in Fair and Affordable Housing in the U.S.: Trends, Outcomes, Future Directions (Silverman, Robert Mark & Patterson, Kelly L. eds., 2011)Google Scholar
DiPasquale, Denise & Glaeser, Edward L., Incentives and Social Capital: Are Homeowners Better Citizens? 11 (Nat. Bur. Econ. Research, Working Paper No. 6363, 1998)
Zandt, Shannon Van & Rohe, William M., The Sustainability of Low-Income Homeownership: The Incidence of Unexpected Costs and Needed Repairs Among Low-Income Home Buyers, 21–2 Housing Pol’y Debate317 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, Stephanie M., Reassessing the Citizen Virtues of Homeownership, 100 Colum. L. Rev. 101 (2011)Google Scholar
Ellen, Ingrid Gould & Turner, Margery Austin, Does Neighborhood Matter? Assessing Recent Evidence, 8 Housing Pol’y Debate (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Amanda Moore et al., Civic Engagement among Low-Income and Low-Wealth Families: In Their Words, 55–2 Family Relations (Apr. 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, Karla & Sen, Aruit, Homeownership, Community Interactions, and Segregation, The American Economic Review1167 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×