Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-s4m2s Total loading time: 0.255 Render date: 2021-10-23T16:34:28.347Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

7 - The Burden of Home Buying While Black or Latino

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Mechele Dickerson
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

After the Great Depression and again after World War II, the U.S. government engaged in aggressive efforts to increase overall homeownership rates. One early marketing and advertising effort, pushed by the powerful and politically influential real estate lobby, was the “Everyman’s Home” campaign. This campaign emphasized that home buying was not just for the doctor and lawyer: everyone, including the wage-earning plumber or the electrician, could become a homeowner in the United States. This certainly was true for some doctors, lawyers, and wage earners.

The Happy Homeownership Narrative neglects to mention that virtually all of the programs and initiatives the United States created to encourage and help Americans buy and remain in their homes, including the Everyman’s Home campaign, were designed to help white households. Until homeownership rates stalled in the 1990s, U.S. political leaders engaged in few major efforts to make homeownership accessible or affordable for blacks or Latinos.

Black renters who have tried to become homeowners have been deemed “mud people” who do not pay their bills, their neighborhoods have been called slums, and the loans that banks offer to them have been called “ghetto loans.” While such racist references and stereotypes might have been expected – and certainly would not have been shocking – in the 1940s or 1950s, loan officers referred to blacks using these derogatory terms in the 2000s, while they were steering blacks to higher cost mortgage products during the housing boom. Unlike the potential homeowners envisioned in the Everyman’s Home campaign, blacks and Latinos have always faced significant, and at times almost insurmountable, burdens when they have tried to buy homes – whether they are doctors, lawyers, plumbers, or electricians.

Type
Chapter
Information
Homeownership and America's Financial Underclass
Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions
, pp. 145 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kimble, John, Insuring Inequality: The Role of the Federal Housing Administration in the Urban Ghettoization of African Americans, 32 Law and Soc. Inquiry399 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Adam, The Creation of Homeownership: How New Deal Changes in Banking Regulation Simultaneously Made Homeownership Accessible to Whites and Out of Reach for Blacks, 115 Yale L.J. 186 (2005)Google Scholar
Fischer, Mary J. & Massey, Douglas S., The Ecology of Racial Discrimination, 3 City & Community221 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpusor, Adrian G. & Loges, William E., Rental Discrimination and Ethnicity in Names, 36 J. Applied Soc. Psych. 934, (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Stuart A. & Rosenthal, Stuart S., Homeownership in the 1980s and 1990s: Aggregate Trends and Racial Gaps, 57 J. Urb. Econ. 101 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaersvang, Dana L., The Fair Housing Act and Disparate Impact in Homeowners Insurance, 104 Mich. L. Rev. 1993 (2006)Google Scholar
Shah, Anuj K. et al., Some Consequences of Having Too Little, 338 Science682 (2012)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sagalyn, Lynne Beyer, Mortgage Lending in Older Urban Neighborhoods: Lessons from Past Experience, 465 Annals Am. Acad.Pol. & Soc. Sci. 98,(1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Camille Zubrinsky, Neighborhood Racial-Composition Preferences: Evidence from a Multiethnic Metropolis, 47–3 Social Problems (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostic, Raphael W. & Martin, Richard W., Have Anti-Discrimination Housing Laws Worked? Evidence from Trends in Black Homeownership, 31–1 The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics5–26 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, Michael H. & Wachter, Susan M., The Spatial Bias of Federal Housing Law and Policy: Concentrated Poverty in Urban America, 143 U. Penn. L. Rev. 1285 (1995)Google Scholar
Reardon, Sean F. & Yun, John T., Suburban Racial Change and Suburban School Segregation, 74 Soc. of Educ. 79 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder, Kyle & South, Scott J., Spatial Dynamics of White Flight: The Effects of Local and Extra Local Racial Conditions on Neighborhood Out-Migration, 73 Am. Soc. Rev. 792 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flippen, Chenoa, Unequal Returns to Housing Investments? A Study of Real Housing Appreciation among Black, White, and Hispanic Households, 82 Soc. Forces 1523 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, Lisa, School Choice through Relocation: Evidence from the Washington, D.C. Area, 86 J. of Public Econ. 155 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipp, John R., Violent Crime, Mobility Decisions, and Neighborhood Racial/Ethnic Transition, 58 Soc. Probs. 410 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocian, Debbie Gruenstein et al., Race, Ethnicity and Subprime Home Loan Pricing, 60 J. Econ. & Bus.110, 110–11 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivo, Lauren J. & Kaufman, Robert L., Housing and Wealth Inequality: Racial-Ethnic Differences in Home Equity in the United States, 41 Demography 585 (2004)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyly, Elvin & Ponder, C.S., Gender, Age, and Race in Subprime America, 21 Housing Pol’y Debate 529 (2011)Google Scholar
Karp, Jonathan & Jordan, Miriam, How the Subprime Mess Hit Poor Immigrant Groups, Wall. St. J. (Dec. 6, 2007), at A1Google Scholar
Spader, Jonathan & Quercia, Roberto G., CRA Lending in a Changing Context: Evidence of Interaction with FHA and Subprime Originations, 44 J. Real Est. Fin. & Econ. 505 (2012)Google Scholar
Haurin, Donald R. & Morrow, Hazel A. – Jones, The Impact of Real Estate Market Knowledge on Tenure Choice: A Comparison of Black and White Households, 17 Housing Pol’y Debate625 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×