Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems

Department of Health. Maternity Matters: Choice, Access and Continuity of Care in a Safe Service. London: Department of Health, 2007.Google Scholar

Expert Maternity Group. Woman centred care. In Department of Health. Changing Childbirth. Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO, 1993, pp. 5–8.Google Scholar

Lau, TK. Prenatal fetal surveillance. In James, D, Steer, PJ, Weiner, CP, Gonik, B (eds), High Risk Pregnancy: Management Options, 4th edn. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2011, pp. 163–72.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Snijders, R, Harman, CR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 755–63.Google Scholar PubMed

Practice bulletin no. 145: antepartum fetal surveillance. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 182–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pay, AS, Wiik, J, Backe, B, et al. Symphysis–fundus height measurement to predict small-for-gestational-age status at birth: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 22.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Persson, B, Stangenberg, M, Lunell, NO, et al. Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 206–11.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neilson, JP. Symphysis–fundal height measurement in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000944.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Francis, A. Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 309–17.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schmidt, W, Cseh, I, Hara, K, Kubli, F. Maternal perception of fetal movements and real-time ultrasound findings. J Perinat Med 1984; 12: 313–18.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tuffnell, DJ, Cartmill, RS, Lilford, RJ. Fetal movements: factors affecting their perception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 39: 165–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, CV, Davis, SA, Rayburn, WF. Patients’ acceptance of monitoring fetal movement: a randomized comparison of charting techniques. J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 144–6.Google Scholar PubMed

Mangesi, L, Hofmeyr, GJ, Smith, V, Smyth, RM. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (10): CD004909.CrossRef Google Scholar

Melendez, TD1, Rayburn, WF, Smith, CV. Characterization of fetal body movement recorded by the Hewlett-Packard M-1350-A fetal monitor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 700–2.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reduced Fetal Movements. Green-top Guideline No. 57. London: RCOG, 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_57.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Saastad, E, Tveit, JV, Flenady, V, et al. Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduced delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women: a clinical quality improvement. BMC Res Notes 2010; 3: 2.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heazell, AE, Bernatavicius, G, Roberts, SA, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation–a feasibility study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 95.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

AFFIRM. Can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focussing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. http://www.crh.ed.ac.uk/affirm (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Beattie, RB, Dornan, JC. Antenatal screening for intrauterine growth retardation with umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography. BMJ 1989; 298: 631–5.Google Scholar PubMed

Nelson, TR, Pretorius, DH. The Doppler signal: where does it come from and what does it mean? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 439–47.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Giles, W, Bisits, A, O’Callaghan, S, Gil, A; DAMP Study Group. The Doppler assessment in multiple pregnancy randomised controlled trial of ultrasound biometry versus umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound and biometry in twin pregnancy. BJOG 2003; 110: 593–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eik-Nes, SH, Brubaak, AO, Ulstein, MK. Measurement of human fetal blood flow. BMJ 1980; 280: 283–4.Google Scholar

Mires, GJ, Patel, NB, Dempster, J. The value of fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in the prediction of adverse fetal outcome in high-risk pregnancies. J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 10: 261–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burns, PN. Principles of Doppler and color flow. Radiology in Medicine 1993; 85 (5 Suppl 1): 3–16.Google Scholar PubMed

GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003; 110: 27–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lees, C, Marlow, N, Arabin, B, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 400–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U. Evaluation of the fetal coronary circulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 405–12.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cheema, R, Dubiel, M, Breborowicz, G, Gudmundsson, S. Fetal cerebral venous Doppler velocimetry in normal and high-risk pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 147–53.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bhide, A, Acharya, G, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 233–39.Google Scholar

Thompson, RS, Trudinger, BJ. Doppler waveform pulsatility index and resistance, pressure and flow in the umbilical placental circulation: an investigation using a mathematical model. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990; 16: 449–58.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gilbert, WM, Nicolaides, KH, Sel, T, Campbell, S. Comparison of umbilical artery flow velocity waveform indices as measured by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7: 549–51.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (11): CD007529.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Bilardo, CM, Stigter, RH, et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 564–70.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ferrazzi, E, Bozzo, M, Rigano, S, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 140–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

DeVore, GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 5–15.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Khalil, AA, Morales-Rosello, J, Morlando, M, et al. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 54.e1–10.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Acharya, G, Tronnes, A, Rasanen, J. Aortic isthmus and cardiac monitoring of the growth-restricted fetus. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 113–25, vi–vii.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bilardo, CM, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Doppler measurements of fetal and uteroplacental circulations: relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 115–20.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Weiner, CP, Harman, CR. Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted foetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 240–5.Google Scholar

Lees, CC, Marlow, N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2162–72.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Talone, PE, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. Doppler indices from inferior vena cava and ductus venosus in predicting pH and oxygen tension in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth-retarded foetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 401–10.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Medley, N. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (4): CD001450.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harrington, KF, Campbell, S, Bewley, S, Bower, S. Doppler velocimetry studies of the uterine artery in the early prediction of pre-eclampsia and intra-uterine growth retardation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 42: S14–20.Google Scholar PubMed

Velauthar, L, Plana, MN, Kalidindi, M, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 500–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Allen, RE, Morlando, M, Thilaganathan, B, et al. Predictive accuracy of second trimester uterine artery Doppler indices for stillbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 22–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.14914.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus 2014. Green-top Guideline No. 31. London: RCOG, 2014. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_31.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Boyle, M. Antenatal investigations. In Henderson, C, Macdonald, S (eds), Mayes’ Midwifery: a Textbook for Midwives. Edinburgh: Bailliere Tindall, 2004.Google Scholar

Owen, P. Fetal assessment in the third trimester: fetal growth and biophysical methods. In Chamberlain, G, Steer, P (eds), Turnbull’s Obstetrics. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2001.Google Scholar

Dawes, GS, Lobb, M, Moulden, M, Redman, CWG, Wheeler, T. Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 791–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Valensise, H, Facchinetti, F, Vasapollo, B, et al. The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 125: 185–92.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

NHS Litigation Authority. Ten Years of Maternity Claims: An Analysis of NHS Litigation Authority Data. London: NHS, 2012. http://www.nhsla.com/Pages/Publications.aspx?library=safety%7clearningfromclaims%7cmaternityclaimsdataproject (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum Care for Healthy Women and Babies. Clinical Guidance CG190. London. NICE, 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190 (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Dawes, GS, Moulden, M, Redman, CW. Short-term fetal heart rate variation, decelerations, and umbilical flow velocity waveforms before labor. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 673–8.Google Scholar PubMed

Dawes, GS, Moulden, M, Redman, CW. Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. J Perinat Med 1996; 24: 25–36.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dawes, GS, Lobb, M, Moulden, M, Redman, CW, Wheeler, T. Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers. BJOG 2014; 121 (Suppl 7): 2–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Serra, V, Bellver, J, Moulden, M, Redman, CW. Computerized analysis of normal fetal heart rate pattern throughout gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 74–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance: Clinical Guideline, 3rd edn. Melbourne: RANZCOG, 2014. https://www.ranzcog.edu.au/RANZCOG_SITE/media/RANZCOG-MEDIA/Women%27s%20Health/Statement%20and%20guidelines/Clinical-Obstetrics/Intrapartum-Fetal-Surveillance-Guideline-Third-edition-Aug-2014.pdf?ext=.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Bellver, J, Perales, A, Maiques, V, Serra, V. Can antepartum computerized cardiotocography predict the evolution of intrapartum acid-base status in normal fetuses? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 267–71.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buscicchio, G, Giannubilo, SR, Bezzeccheri, V, et al. Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19: 39–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guzman, ER, Vintzileos, AM, Martins, M, et al. The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 969–74.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Soncini, E, Ronzoni, E, Macovei, D, Grignaffini, A. Integrated monitoring of fetal growth restriction by computerized cardiotocography and Doppler flow velocimetry. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 128: 222–30.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lalor, JG, Fawole, B, Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (1): CD000038.CrossRef Google Scholar

Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GML, Devane, D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9): CD007863.CrossRef Google Scholar

Manning, FA. Dynamic ultrasound-based fetal assessment: the fetal biophysical profile score. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1995; 38: 26–44.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Archibong, EI. Biophysical profile score in late pregnancy and timing of delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 64: 129–33.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alfirevic, Z, Walkinshaw, SA. A randomised controlled trial of simple compared with complex antenatal fetal monitoring after 42 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 638–43.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lalor, JG, Fawole, B, Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (4): CD000038.Google Scholar

Bricker, L, Neilson, JP, Dowswell, T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks’ gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4): CD001451.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakalis, S, Peeva, G, Gonzalez, R, Poon, LC, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30–34 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 446–51.Google Scholar PubMed

Kean, LH, Liu, DTY. Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population. J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 16: 77–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chauhan, SP, Magann, EF. Screening for fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 284–94.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Sharman, RS, Deter, RL, Park, SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chang, TC, Robson, SC, Boys, RJ, Spencer, JA. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 1030–8.Google Scholar PubMed

Robson, SC, Chang, TC. Intrauterine growth retardation. In Reed, G, Claireaux, A, Cockburn, F (eds), Diseases of the Fetus and the Newborn, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994, pp. 277–86.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Chang, A, Kalyan, B, Sahota, D, Symonds, EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992; 339: 283–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gardosi, J. Customised assessment of fetal growth potential: implications for perinatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97: F314–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pang, MW, Leung, TN, Sahota, DS, Lau, TK, Chang, AM. Customizing fetal biometric charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 271–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gestation Network. GROW growth charts. http://www.gestation.net/growthcharts.htm (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014; 384: 869–79. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490-2.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (3): CD006593.CrossRef Google Scholar

Proud, J, Grant, AM. Third trimester placental grading by ultrasonography as a test of fetal wellbeing. Br Med J 1987; 294: 1641–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chen, KH, Seow, KM, Chen, LR. The role of preterm placental calcification on assessing risks of stillbirth. Placenta 2015; 36: 1039–44.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Forest, JC, Massé, J, Moutquin, JM. Screening for Down syndrome during first trimester: a prospective study using free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A. Clin Biochem 1997; 30: 333–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wise, J. Quadruple test is available for Down’s syndrome. BMJ 1996; 313: 380.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lakhi, N, Govind, A, Moretti, M, Jones, J. Maternal serum analytes as markers of adverse obstetric outcome. Obstetrician Gynaecologist 2012; 14: 267–273.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Molina, F, Kagan, KO, Nicolaides, KH. First trimester ultrasound and biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of preterm or early preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 147–52.Google Scholar PubMed

Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Avgidou, K, Molina, F, Nicolaides, KH. First trimester biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 15–19.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Nicolaides, KH. Low levels of maternal serum PAPP-A in the first trimester and the risk of pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 7–10.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Avgidou, K, Nicolaides, KH. First-trimester ultrasound and biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of impending fetal death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 637–43.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chappell, LC, Duckworth, S, Seed, PT, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor in women with suspected preeclampsia: a prospective multicenter study. Circulation 2013; 128: 2121–31.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Griffin, M, Seed, PT, Webster, L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor and ultrasound parameters to predict the small-for-gestational-age infant in women presenting with reduced symphysis–fundus height. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 182–90.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Powers, RW, Jeyabalan, A, Clifton, RG, et al. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1), endoglin and placental growth factor (PlGF) in preeclampsia among high risk pregnancies. PLoS One 2010; 5: e13263.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Akolekar, R, Syngelaki, A, Sarquis, R, Zvanca, M, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical markers at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diag 2011; 31: 66–74.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nanda, S, Savvidou, M, Syngelaki, A, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 135–41.Google Scholar PubMed

Gagnon, A, Wilson, RD, Audibert, F, et al; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Genetics Committee. Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30: 918–49.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

D’Alton, M, Cleary-Goldman, J. First and second trimester evaluation of risk for fetal aneuploidy: the secondary outcomes of the FASTER trial. Semin Perinatol 2005; 29: 240–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dugoff, L, Hobbins, JC, Malone, FD, et al. First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: a population-based screening study (the FASTER trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1446–51.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Cnossen, JS, Langejans, M, et al. Serum screening with Down’s syndrome markers to predict pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008; 8: 33.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Blumenfeld, YJ, Baer, RJ, Druzin, ML, et al. Association between maternal characteristics, abnormal serum aneuploidy analytes, and placental abruption. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 144.e1–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Salafia, CM, Silberman, L, Herrera, NE, Mahoney, MJ. Placental pathology at term associated with elevated midtrimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein concentration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 1064–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 136–42.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Cosmi, E, Bilardo, CM, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 253–61.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Harman, CR: The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 571–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Viscardi, RM, Hussey-Gardner, B, et al. Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: Relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 44–50.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Frøen, JF, Gardosi, JO, Thurmann, A, Francis, A, Stray-Pedersen, B. Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 801–7.Google Scholar PubMed

GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003; 110: 27–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lees, CC, Marlow, N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2162–72.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Metzger, BE, Lowe, LP, Dyer, AR, et al.; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1991–2002.Google Scholar

Poon, L, Kametas, NA, Maiz, A, et al. First trimester prediction of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Hypertension 2009; 53: 812–18.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thornton, JG, Hornbuckle, J, Vail, A, et al.; GRIT Study Group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 513–20.Google Scholar PubMed

Vainio, M, Kujansuu, E, Iso-Mustajarvi, M, Maenpaa, J. Low dose acetylsalicylic acid in prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation in women with bilateral uterine artery notches. BJOG 2002; 109: 161–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vintzileos, AM, Fleming, AD, Scorza, WE, et al. Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 707–13.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lubchenco, LO, Hansman, C, Boyd, E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from live born birth-weight data at 24–42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 1963; 32: 793.Google Scholar

Battaglia, FC, Lubchenco, LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr 1967; 71: 159–63.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bernstein, IM, Horbar, JD, Badger, GJ, Ohlsson, A, Golan, A. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. The Vermont Oxford Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 198–206.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Barker, DJ. Fetal growth and adult disease. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 275–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hoffman, HJ, Stark, CR, Lundin, FE, Ashbrook, JD. Analysis of birth weight, gestational age, and fetal viability, U. S. births, 1968. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1974; 29: 651–81.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gardosi, J, Chang, A, Kalyan, B, Sahota, D, Symonds, EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992; 339: 283–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Clausson, B, Gardosi, J, Francis, A, Cnattingius, S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108: 830–4.Google Scholar PubMed

Bukowski, R, Burgett, AD, Gei, A, Saade, GR, Hankins, GD V. Impairment of fetal growth potential and neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1011–15.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, HC. Fetal growth and neonatal mortality. Pediatrics 1972; 49: 392–9.Google Scholar PubMed

Weiner, CP, Robinson, D. Sonographic diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation using the postnatal ponderal index and the crown-heel length as standards of diagnosis. Am J Perinatol 1989; 6: 380–3.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Walther, FJ, Ramaekers, LH. The ponderal index as a measure of the nutritional status at birth and its relation to some aspects of neonatal morbidity. J Perinat Med 1982; 10: 42–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Lucas, MJ, Leveno, KJ. Effects of symmetric and asymmetric fetal growth on pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 321–7.Google Scholar PubMed

Seval, Y, Sati, L, Celik-Ozenci, C, Taskin, O, Demir, R. The distribution of angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2 and their receptors Tie-1 and Tie-2 in the very early human placenta. Placenta 2008; 29: 809–15.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ahmed, A, Dunk, C, Ahmad, S, Khaliq, A. Regulation of placental vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placenta growth factor (PlGF) and soluble Flt-1 by oxygen: a review. Placenta 2000; 21 (Suppl 1): S16–24.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baumann, MU, Bersinger, NA, Surbek, D V. Serum markers for predicting pre-eclampsia. Mol Aspects Med 2007; 28: 227–44.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pijnenborg, R, Bland, JM, Robertson, WB, Brosens, I. Uteroplacental arterial changes related to interstitial trophoblast migration in early human pregnancy. Placenta 1983; 4: 397–413.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Aplin, J. Maternal influences on placental development. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2000; 11: 115–25.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kingdom, JC, Burrell, SJ, Kaufmann, P. Pathology and clinical implications of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 271–86.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Castellucci, M, Kosanke, G, Verdenelli, F, Huppertz, B, Kaufmann, P. Villous sprouting: fundamental mechanisms of human placental development. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 485–94.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kaufmann, P, Scheffen, I. Placental development. In Polin, RA, Fox, WW (eds), Fetal and Neonatal Physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1998, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar

Pardi, G, Marconi, AM, Cetin, I. Placental–fetal interrelationship in IUGR fetuses: a review. Placenta 2002; 23 (Suppl A): S136–41.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Battaglia, FC, Regnault, TRH. Placental transport and metabolism of amino acids. Placenta 2001; 22: 145–61.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Haggarty, P. Placental regulation of fatty acid delivery and its effect on fetal growth: a review. Placenta 2002; 23: S28–38.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Illsley, NP. Glucose transporters in the human placenta. Placenta 2000; 21: 14–22.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sibley, CP, Glazier, JD, Greenwood, SL, et al. Regulation of placental transfer: the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger: a review. Placenta 2002; 23 (Suppl A): S39–46.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Meschia, G. Placenta respiratory gas exchange and fetal oxygenation. In Creasy, RK, Resnik, R (eds), Maternal–Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1987, pp. 274–85.Google Scholar

Carter, AM. Placental oxygen consumption. Part I: in vivo studies – a review. Placenta 2000; 21 (Suppl A): S31–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lederman, SA, Paxton, A, Heymsfield, SB, et al. Maternal body fat and water during pregnancy: Do they raise infant birth weight? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 235–40.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reece, EA, Wiznitzer, A, Le, E, et al. The relation between human fetal growth and fetal blood levels of insulin-like growth factors I and II, their binding proteins, and receptors. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 88–95.Google Scholar PubMed

Hoggard, N, Haggarty, P, Thomas, L, Lea, RG. Leptin expression in placental and fetal tissues: does leptin have a functional role? Biochem Soc Trans 2001; 29: 57–63.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jansson, N, Greenwood, SL, Johansson, BR, Powell, TL, Jansson, T. Leptin stimulates the activity of the system A amino acid transporter in human placental villous fragments. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 1205–11.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rudolph, AM. Distribution and regulation of blood flow in the fetal and neonatal lamb. Circ Res 1985; 57: 811–21.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA. The fetal circulation and essential organs: a new twist to an old tale. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 349–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guyton, AC, Cowley, AW, Young, DB, et al. Integration and control of circulatory function. Int Rev Physiol 1976; 9: 341–85.Google Scholar PubMed

Winick, M, Noble, A. Quantitative changes in DNA, RNA, and protein during prenatal and postnatal growth in the rat. Dev Biol 1965; 12: 451–66.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Snijders, RJ, Sherrod, C, Gosden, CM, Nicolaides, KH. Fetal growth retardation: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 547–55.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Khoury, MJ, Erickson, JD, Cordero, JF, McCarthy, BJ. Congenital malformations and intrauterine growth retardation: a population study. Pediatrics 1988; 82: 83–90.Google Scholar PubMed

Sickler, GK, Nyberg, DA, Sohaey, R, Luthy, DA. Polyhydramnios and fetal intrauterine growth restriction: ominous combination. J Ultrasound Med 1997; 16: 609–14.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ødegård, RA, Vatten, LJ, Nilsen, ST, Salvesen, KÅ, Austgulen, R. Preeclampsia and fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 950–5.Google Scholar PubMed

Kupferminc, MJ, Peri, H, Zwang, E, et al. High prevalence of the prothrombin gene mutation in women with intrauterine growth retardation, abruptio placentae and second trimester loss. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 963–7.Google Scholar PubMed

Weiner, CP. Pathogenesis, evaluation, and potential treatments for severe, early onset growth retardation. Semin Perinatol 1989; 13: 320–7.Google Scholar

Cliver, SP, Goldenberg, RL, Cutter, GR, et al. The effect of cigarette smoking on neonatal anthropometric measurements. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 625–30.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goldenberg, RL, Cliver, SP, Cutter, GR, et al. Blood pressure, growth retardation, and preterm delivery. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1992; 8 (Suppl 1): 82–90.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ferrazzi, E, Bulfamante, G, Mezzopane, R, et al. Uterine Doppler velocimetry and placental hypoxic-ischemic lesion in pregnancies with fetal intrauterine growth restriction. Placenta 1999; 20: 389–94.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrington, K, Carpenter, RG, Goldfrad, C, Campbell, S. Transvaginal Doppler ultrasound of the uteroplacental circulation in the early prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 674–81.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bower, S, Kingdom, J, Campbell, S. Objective and subjective assessment of abnormal uterine artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 260–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rigano, S, Bozzo, M, Ferrazzi, E, et al. Early and persistent reduction in umbilical vein blood flow in the growth-restricted fetus: a longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 834–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Morrow, RJ, Adamson, SL, Bull, SB, Ritchie, JW. Effect of placental embolization on the umbilical arterial velocity waveform in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1055–60.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wilcox, GR, Trudinger, BJ, Cook, CM, Wilcox, WR, Connelly, AJ. Reduced fetal platelet counts in pregnancies with abnormal Doppler umbilical flow waveforms. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 639–43.Google Scholar PubMed

Papageorghiou, AT, Yu, CKH, Cicero, S, Bower, S, Nicolaides, KH. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 12: 78–88.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Weiner, CP. The relationship between the umbilical artery systolic/diastolic ratio and umbilical blood gas measurements in specimens obtained by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1198–202.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bilardo, CM, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Doppler measurements of fetal and uteroplacental circulations: relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 115–20.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hecher, K, Spernol, R, Stettner, H, Szalay, S. Potential for diagnosing imminent risk to appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses by Doppler sonographic examination of umbilical and cerebral arterial blood flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 266–71.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Crimmins, S, Desai, A, Block-Abraham, D, et al. A comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 669.e1–10.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jones, CT, Ritchie, JW, Walker, D. The effects of hypoxia on glucose turnover in the fetal sheep. J Dev Physiol 1983; 5: 223–35.Google Scholar PubMed

Nicolini, U, Hubinont, C, Santolaya, J, et al. Maternal–fetal glucose gradient in normal pregnancies and in pregnancies complicated by alloimmunization and fetal growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 924–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Economides, DL, Nicolaides, KH. Blood glucose and oxygen tension levels in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 385–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hubinont, C, Nicolini, U, Fisk, NM, Tannirandorn, Y, Rodeck, CH. Endocrine pancreatic function in growth-retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 541–4.Google Scholar PubMed

Van Assche, FA, Aerts, L, De Prins, FA. The fetal endocrine pancreas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1984; 18: 267–72.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Soothill, PW, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Prenatal asphyxia, hyperlacticaemia, hypoglycaemia, and erythroblastosis in growth retarded fetuses. Br Med J 1987; 294: 1051–3.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Owens, JA, Falconer, J, Robinson, JS. Effect of restriction of placental growth on fetal and utero-placental metabolism. J Dev Physiol 1987; 9: 225–38.Google Scholar PubMed

Paolini, CL, Marconi, AM, Ronzoni, S, et al. Placental transport of leucine, phenylalanine, glycine, and proline in intrauterine growth-restricted pregnancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 5427–32.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Economides, DL, Nicolaides, KH, Gahl, WA, Bernardini, I, Evans, MI. Plasma amino acids in appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1219–27.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bernstein, IM, Silver, R, Nair, KS, Stirewalt, WS. Amniotic fluid glycine-valine ratio and neonatal morbidity in fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 933–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vannucci, RC, Vannucci, SJ. Glucose metabolism in the developing brain. Semin Perinatol 2000; 24: 107–15.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fisher, DJ, Heymann, MA, Rudolph, AM. Fetal myocardial oxygen and carbohydrate consumption during acutely induced hypoxemia. Am J Physiol 1982; 242: H657–61.Google Scholar PubMed

Spahr, R, Probst, I, Piper, HM. Substrate utilization of adult cardiac myocytes. Basic Res Cardiol 1985; 80 (Suppl 1): 53–6.Google Scholar PubMed

Fant, ME, Weisoly, D. Insulin and insulin-like growth factors in human development: implications for the perinatal period. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25: 426–35.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rizzo, G, Arduini, D. Fetal cardiac function in intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 876–82.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Gortner, L, et al. Coronary artery blood flow visualization signifies hemodynamic deterioration in growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 425–31.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reed, KL, Anderson, CF, Shenker, L. Changes in intracardiac Doppler blood flow velocities in fetuses with absent umbilical artery diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 774–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

al-Ghazali, W, Chita, SK, Chapman, MG, Allan, LD. Evidence of redistribution of cardiac output in asymmetrical growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 697–704.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Griffin, D, Bilardo, K, Masini, L, et al. Doppler blood flow waveforms in the descending thoracic aorta of the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 997–1006.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Akalin-Sel, T, Nicolaides, KH, Peacock, J, Campbell, S. Doppler dynamics and their complex interrelation with fetal oxygen pressure, carbon dioxide pressure, and pH in growth-retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 439–44.Google Scholar PubMed

Wladimiroff, JW, Tonge, HM, Stewart, PA. Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 471–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arbeille, P, Maulik, D, Fignon, A, Stale, H, Berson, M, Bodard, S, et al. Assessment of the fetal PO2 changes by cerebral and umbilical Doppler on lamb fetuses during acute hypoxia. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21: 861–70.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fouron, JC, Skoll, A, Sonesson, SE, et al. Relationship between flow through the fetal aortic isthmus and cerebral oxygenation during acute placental circulatory insufficiency in ovine fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 1102–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boito, S, Struijk, PC, Ursem, NTC, Fedele, L, Wladimiroff, JW. Fetal brain/liver volume ratio and umbilical volume flow parameters relative to normal and abnormal human development. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 256–61.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Manning, FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26: 557–77.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arduini, D, Rizzo, G, Romanini, C, Mancuso, S. Computerized analysis of behavioural states in asymmetrical growth retarded fetuses. J Perinat Med 1988; 16: 357–63.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arduini, D, Rizzo, G, Caforio, L, et al. Behavioural state transitions in healthy and growth retarded fetuses. Early Hum Dev 1989; 19: 155–65.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nijhuis, IJM, Ten Hof, J, Nijhuis, JG, et al. Temporal organization of fetal behavior from 24-weeks gestation onwards in normal and complicated pregnancies. Dev Psychobiol 1999; 34: 257–68.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vindla, S, James, D, Sahota, D. Computerised analysis of unstimulated and stimulated behaviour in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 83: 37–45.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yum, MK, Park, EY, Kim, CR, Hwang, JH. Alterations in irregular and fractal heart rate behavior in growth restricted fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 94: 51–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ribbert, LS, Nicolaides, KH, Visser, GH. Prediction of fetal acidaemia in intrauterine growth retardation: comparison of quantified fetal activity with biophysical profile score. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 653–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nijhuis, IJM, Ten Hof, J, Mulder, EJH, et al. Fetal heart rate in relation to its variation in normal and growth retarded fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 89: 27–33.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Henson, G, Dawes, GS, Redman, CW. Characterization of the reduced heart rate variation in growth-retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 751–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ribbert, LS, Snijders, RJ, Nicolaides, KH, Visser, GH. Relation of fetal blood gases and data from computer-assisted analysis of fetal heart rate patterns in small for gestation fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 820–3.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, JH, Anand, KJ, Cotes, PM, et al. Antenatal fetal heart rate variation in relation to the respiratory and metabolic status of the compromised human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 980–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ribbert, LSM, Visser, GHA, Mulder, EJH, Zonneveld, MF, Morssink, LP. Changes with time in fetal heart rate variation, movement incidences and haemodynamics in intrauterine growth retarded fetuses: A longitudinal approach to the assessment of fetal well being. Early Hum Dev 1993; 31: 195–208.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pillai, M, James, D. Continuation of normal neurobehavioural development in fetuses with absent umbilical arterial end diastolic velocities. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 277–81.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rizzo, G, Arduini, D, Pennestri, F, Romanini, C, Mancuso, S. Fetal behaviour in growth retardation: its relationship to fetal blood flow. Prenat Diagn 1987; 7: 229–38.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arduini, D, Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Rinaldo, D, Romanini, C. Fetal pH value determined by cordocentesis: an independent predictor of the development of antepartum fetal heart rate decelerations in growth retarded fetuses with absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery. J Perinat Med 1996; 24: 601–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA. Integrated fetal testing in growth restriction: combining multivessel Doppler and biophysical parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 1–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA. Evaluation of severe growth retardation using cordocentesis–hematologic and metabolic alterations by etiology. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 225–9.Google Scholar PubMed

Thilaganathan, B, Athanasiou, S, Ozmen, S, et al. Umbilical cord blood erythroblast count as an index of intrauterine hypoxia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1994; 70: F192–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maier, RF, Günther, A, Vogel, M, Dudenhausen, JW, Obladen, M. Umbilical venous erythropoietin and umbilical arterial pH in relation to morphologic placental abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 81–7.Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Reiss, I, et al. Neonatal nucleated red blood cell counts in growth-restricted fetuses: Relationship to arterial and venous Doppler studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 190–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bernstein, PS, Minior, VK, Divon, MY. Neonatal nucleated red blood cell counts in small-for-gestational age fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1079–84.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Trudinger, B, Song, JZ, Wu, ZH, Wang, J. Placental insufficiency is characterized by platelet activation in the fetus. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 975–81.Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Reiss, I, et al. Absent umbilical artery end-diastolic velocity in growth-restricted fetuses: a risk factor for neonatal thrombocytopenia. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 162–6.Google Scholar PubMed

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Rinaldo, D, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. Ventricular ejection force in growth-retarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 247–55.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hecher, K, Campbell, S, Doyle, P, Harrington, K, Nicolaides, K. Assessment of fetal compromise by Doppler ultrasound investigation of the fetal circulation. Arterial, intracardiac, and venous blood flow velocity studies. Circulation 1995; 91: 129–38.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kiserud, T, Eik-Nes, SH, Blaas, HG, Hellevik, LR, Simensen, B. Ductus venosus blood velocity and the umbilical circulation in the seriously growth-retarded fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 109–14.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Talone, PE, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. Doppler indices from inferior vena cava and ductus venosus in predicting pH and oxygen tension in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth-retarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 401–10.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gudmundsson, S, Tulzer, G, Huhta, JC, Marsal, K. Venous Doppler in the fetus with absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 262–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vintzileos, AM, Fleming, AD, Scorza, WE, et al. Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 707–13.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Manning, FA, Snijders, R, Harman, CR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 755–63.Google Scholar PubMed

Guzman, ER, Vintzileos, AM, Martins, M, et al. The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 969–74.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Pietropolli, A, et al. Fetal cardiac and extracardiac flows preceding intrauterine death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 139–42.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Harman, CR. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 571–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

James, DK, Parker, MJ, Smoleniec, JS. Comprehensive fetal assessment with three ultrasonographic characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1486–95.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harrington, K, Thompson, MO, Carpenter, RG, Nguyen, M, Campbell, S. Doppler fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or delivery of a small for gestational age baby: 2. Longitudinal analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 453–66.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ferrazzi, E, Bozzo, M, Rigano, S, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 140–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hecher, K, Bilardo, CM, Stigter, RH, et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 564–70.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Reiss, I, et al. Relationship between arterial and venous Doppler and perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 407–13.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hershkovitz, R, Kingdom, JCP, Geary, M, Rodeck, CH. Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: Identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 209–12.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vainio, M, Kujansuu, E, Iso-Mustajarvi, M, Maenpaa, J. Low dose acetylsalicylic acid in prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation in women with bilateral uterine artery notches. BJOG 2002; 109: 161–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Poon, LC, Nicolaides, KH. First-trimester maternal factors and biomarker screening for preeclampsia. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 618–27.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Seravalli, V, Block-Abraham, DM, Turan, OM, et al. First-trimester prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates incorporating fetal Doppler parameters and maternal characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 261.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Odibo, AO, Zhong, Y, Goetzinger, KR, et al. First-trimester placental protein 13, PAPP-A, uterine artery Doppler and maternal characteristics in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Placenta 2011; 32: 598–602.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schneuer, FJ, Nassar, N, Khambalia, AZ, et al. First trimester screening of maternal placental protein 13 for predicting preeclampsia and small for gestational age: In-house study and systematic review. Placenta 2012; 33: 735–40.Google Scholar PubMed

Soregaroli, M, Valcamonico, A, Scalvi, L, Danti, L, Frusca, T. Late normalisation of uterine artery velocimetry in high risk pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 95: 42–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Coleman, MAG, McCowan, LME, North, RA. Mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome in high-risk women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 7–12.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yu, CKH, Papageorghiou, AT, Parra, M, Palma, Dias R, Nicolaides, KH. Randomized controlled trial using low-dose aspirin in the prevention of pre-eclampsia in women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 233–9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Seravalli, V, Block-Abraham, DM, Turan, OM, et al. Second-trimester prediction of delivery of a small-for-gestational-age neonate: integrating sequential Doppler information, fetal biometry, and maternal characteristics. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 1037–43.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Warsof, SL, Cooper, DJ, Little, D, Campbell, S. Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 33–9.Google Scholar PubMed

Bakketeig, LS, Eik-Nes, SH, Jacobsen, G. Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy. Lancet 1984; 2: 207–11.Google Scholar PubMed

Hadlock, FP, Deter, RL, Carpenter, RJ, Park, SK. Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137: 83–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014; 384: 869–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490-2.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tamura, RK, Sabbagha, RE, Pan, WH, Vaisrub, N. Ultrasonic fetal abdominal circumference: comparison of direct versus calculated measurement. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 833–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, PA, Johansson, D, Tzannatos, C, Campbell, S. Prenatal measurement of the fetal cerebellum and cisterna cerebellomedullaris by ultrasound. Prenat Diagn 1986; 6: 133–41.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Campbell, S, Thoms, A. Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1977; 84: 165–74.Google Scholar PubMed

Gray, DL, Songster, GS, Parvin, CA, Crane, JP. Cephalic index: a gestational age-dependent biometric parameter. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 600–3.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Shah, Y, Park, SK. The femur length/head circumference relation in obstetric sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1984; 3: 439–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sarmandal, P, Grant, JM. Effectiveness of ultrasound determination of fetal abdominal circumference and fetal ponderal index in the diagnosis of asymmetrical growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 118–23.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hadlock, FP, Deter, RL, Harrist, RB, Roecker, E, Park, SK. A date-independent predictor of intrauterine growth retardation: Femur length/abdominal circumference ratio. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 141: 979–84.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shepard, MJ, Richards, VA, Berkowitz, RL, Warsof, SL, Hobbins, JC. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 47–54.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Sharman, RS, Deter, RL, Park, SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4.Google Scholar PubMed

Weiner, CP, Sabbagha, RE, Vaisrub, N, Socol, ML. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 812–17.Google Scholar PubMed

Stirnemann, J, Villar, J, Salomon, LJ, et al. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 478–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17347.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Da Silva Costa, F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 715–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20272.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chamberlain, PF, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR, Lange, IR. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. II. The relationship of increased amniotic fluid volume to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 250–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Manning, FA, Hill, LM, Platt, LD. Qualitative amniotic fluid volume determination by ultrasound: antepartum detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 254–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 124–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reed, KL, Appleton, CP, Anderson, CF, Shenker, L, Sahn, DJ. Doppler studies of vena cava flows in human fetuses. Insights into normal and abnormal cardiac physiology. Circulation 1990; 81: 498–505.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hecher, K, Campbell, S, Snijders, R, Nicolaides, K. Reference ranges for fetal venous and atrioventricular blood flow parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 381–90.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kanzaki, T, Chiba, Y. Evaluation of the preload condition of the fetus by inferior vena caval blood flow pattern. Fetal Diagn Ther 1990; 5: 168–74.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

DeVore, GR, Horenstein, J. Ductus venosus index: a method for evaluating right ventricular preload in the second-trimester fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 338–42.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Güclü, S, Kush, ML, et al. Venous Doppler in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses with elevated placental blood flow resistance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 277–84.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ott, WJ. Intrauterine growth restriction and Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 661–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Strigini, FAL, De Luca, G, Lencioni, G, et al. Middle cerebral artery velocimetry: Different clinical relevance depending on umbilical velocimetry. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 953–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Severi, FM, Bocchi, C, Visentin, A, et al. Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 225–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McCowan, LM, Harding, JE, Roberts, AB, et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial of two regimens of fetal surveillance for small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal results of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 81–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Westergaard, HB, Langhoff-Roos, J, Lingman, G, Marsál, K, Kreiner, S. A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: Use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 466–76.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Flood, K, Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: Results of the multicenter PORTO Study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014; 211: 288.e1–5.Google Scholar PubMed

Bahado-Singh, RO, Kovanci, E, Jeffres, A, et al. The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 750–6.Google Scholar PubMed

Ribbert, LS, Snijders, RJ, Nicolaides, KH, Visser, GH. Relationship of fetal biophysical profile and blood gas values at cordocentesis in severely growth-retarded fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 569–71.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Clausson, B, Cnattingius, S, Axelsson, O. Outcomes of post-term births: the role of fetal growth restriction and malformations. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 758–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Frøen, JF, Gardosi, JO, Thurmann, A, Francis, A, Stray-Pedersen, B. Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 801–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kupferminc, MJ, Many, A, Bar-Am, A, Lessing, JB, Ascher-Landsberg, J. Mid-trimester severe intrauterine growth restriction is associated with a high prevalence of thrombophilia. BJOG 2002; 109: 1373–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Doubilet, PM, Benson, CB, Wilkins-Haug, L, Ringer, S. Fetuses subsequently born premature are smaller than gestational age-matched fetuses not born premature. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 359–63.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gordijn, SJ, Beune, IM, Thilaganathan, B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 333–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15884.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Van den Veyver, IB, Ni, J, Bowles, N, et al. Detection of intrauterine viral infection using the polymerase chain reaction. Mol Genet Metab 1998; 63: 85–95.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Towbin, J, Bowles, NE, Harman, CR, Weiner, CP. Is adenovirus a fetal pathogen? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 758–63.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gudmundsson, S, Lindblad, A, Marsál, K. Cord blood gases and absence of end-diastolic blood velocities in the umbilical artery. Early Hum Dev 1990; 24: 231–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yoon, BH, Romero, R, Roh, CR, et al. Relationship between the fetal biophysical profile score, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and fetal blood acid-base status determined by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1586–94.Google Scholar PubMed

Nicolini, U, Nicolaidis, P, Fisk, NM, et al. Limited role of fetal blood sampling in prediction of outcome in intrauterine growth retardation. Lancet 1990; 336: 768–72.Google Scholar PubMed

Hecher, K, Snijders, R, Campbell, S, Nicolaides, K. Fetal venous, intracardiac, and arterial blood flow measurements in intrauterine growth retardation: Relationship with fetal blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 10–15.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. The value of fetal arterial, cardiac and venous flows in predicting pH and blood gases measured in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 963–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Weiner, CP, Harman, CR. Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 240–5.Google Scholar PubMed

Ley, D, Tideman, E, Laurin, J, Bjerre, I, Marsal, K. Abnormal fetal aortic velocity waveform and intellectual function at 7 years of age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 160–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Škrablin, S, Kalafatić, D, Banović, I, et al. Antenatal predictors of the neurologic sequelae at 3 years of age: a multivariate analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 93: 173–80.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fouron, JC, Gosselin, J, Raboisson, MJ, et al. The relationship between an aortic isthmus blood flow velocity index and the postnatal neurodevelopmental status of fetuses with placental circulatory insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 497–503.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thornton, JG, Hornbuckle, J, Vail, A, Spiegelhalter, DJ, Levene, M.; GRIT Study Group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 513–20.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Viscardi, RM, Hussey-Gardner, B, Hashmi, N, Harman, C. Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: Relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 44–50.Google Scholar

Schreuder, AM, McDonnell, M, Gaffney, G, Johnson, A, Hope, PL. Outcome at school age following antenatal detection of absent or reversed end diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 86: F108–14.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eixarch, E, Meler, E, Iraola, A, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in 2-year-old infants who were small-for-gestational age term fetuses with cerebral blood flow redistribution. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 894–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Scherjon, S, Briët, J, Oosting, H, Kok, J. The discrepancy between maturation of visual-evoked potentials and cognitive outcome at five years in very preterm infants with and without hemodynamic signs of fetal brain-sparing. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 385–91.Google Scholar PubMed

Manning, FA. Fetal biophysical profile: a critical appraisal. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 5: 975–85.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arabin, B, Becker, R, Mohnhaupt, A, Entezami, M, Weitzel, HK. Prediction of fetal distress and poor outcome in intrauterine growth retardation: a comparison of fetal heart rate monitoring combined with stress tests and Doppler ultrasound. Fetal Diagn Ther 1993; 8: 234–40.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ott, WJ, Mora, G, Arias, F, Sunderji, S, Sheldon, G. Comparison of the modified biophysical profile to a “new” biophysical profile incorporating the middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery velocity flow systolic/diastolic ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 1346–53.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Weiner, Z, Farmakides, G, Schulman, H, Lopresti, S, Schneider, E. Surveillance of growth-retarded fetuses with computerized fetal heart rate monitoring combined with Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 112–18.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arabin, B, Snyjders, R, Mohnhaupt, A, Ragosch, V, Nicolaides, K. Evaluation of the fetal assessment score in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 549–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Turan, S, Turan, OM, Berg, C, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 750–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Turan, OM, Turan, S, Gungor, S, et al. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 160–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wapner, RJ, Martin, CL, Levy, B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2175–84.Google Scholar

GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003; 110: 27–32.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Trudinger, BJ, Cook, CM, Thompson, RS, Giles, WB, Connelly, A. Low-dose aspirin therapy improves fetal weight in umbilical placental insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 681–5.Google Scholar PubMed

Newnham, JP, Godfrey, M, Walters, BJ, Phillips, J, Evans, SF. Low dose aspirin for the treatment of fetal growth restriction: a randomized controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35: 370–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

CLASP (Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy) Collaborative Group. CLASP: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women. Lancet 1994; 343: 619–29.Google Scholar PubMed

Kozer, E, Nikfar, S, Costei, A, et al. Aspirin consumption during the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital anomalies: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1623–30.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S, Bradley, RJ, et al. Maternal oxygen therapy for intrauterine growth retardation. Lancet 1987; 1: 942–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Battaglia, C, Artini, PG, D’Ambrogio, G, et al. Maternal hyperoxygenation in the treatment of intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 430–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Karsdorp, VH, van Vugt, JM, Dekker, GA, van Geijn, HP. Reappearance of end-diastolic velocities in the umbilical artery following maternal volume expansion: a preliminary study. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 679–83.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ronzoni, S, Marconi, AM, Paolini, CL, et al. The effect of a maternal infusion of amino acids on umbilical uptake in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 741–6.Google Scholar PubMed

Ley, D, Wide-Swensson, D, Lindroth, M, Svenningsen, N, Marsal, K. Respiratory distress syndrome in infants with impaired intrauterine growth. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86: 1090–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Unterscheider, J, O’Donoghue, K, Daly, S, et al. Fetal growth restriction and the risk of perinatal mortality-case studies from the multicentre PORTO study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 63.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lees, C, Marlow, N, Arabin, B, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 400–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, Geary, MP, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 290.e1–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Divon, MY, Girz, BA, Lieblich, R, Langer, O. Clinical management of the fetus with markedly diminished umbilical artery end-diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1523–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Harman, CR. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 571–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cosmi, E, Ambrosini, G, D’Antona, D, Saccardi, C, Mari, G. Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 1240–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hernandez-Andrade, E, Stampalija, T, Figueras, F. Cerebral blood flow studies in the diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth restriction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 25: 138–44.Google Scholar PubMed

Cruz-Martínez, R, Figueras, F, Hernandez-Andrade, E, Oros, D, Gratacos, E. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 618–26.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Cosmi, E, Bilardo, CM, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 253–61.Google Scholar PubMed

Soothill, PW, Ajayi, RA, Campbell, S, Ross, EM, Nicolaides, KH. Fetal oxygenation at cordocentesis, maternal smoking and childhood neuro-development. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 59: 21–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kahn, B, Lumey, LH, Zybert, PA, et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 685–92.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA. Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 49: 53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lees, CC, Marlow, N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2162–72.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Trudell, AS, Cahill, AG, Tuuli, MG, Macones, GA, Odibo, AO. Risk of stillbirth after 37 weeks in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 376.e1–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boers, KE, van Wyk, L, van der Post, JAM, et al. Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 344.e1–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sotiriadis, A, Tsiami, A, Papatheodorou, S, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome after a single course of antenatal steroids in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1385–96.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA. Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 136–42.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arcangeli, T, Thilaganathan, B, Hooper, R, Khan, KS, Bhide, A. Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 267–75.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Figueras, F, Oros, D, Cruz-Martinez, R, et al. Neurobehavior in term, small-for-gestational age infants with normal placental function. Pediatrics 2009; 124: e934–41.Google Scholar PubMed

Figueras, F, Eixarch, E, Meler, E, et al. Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136: 34–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Figueras, F, Cruz-Martinez, R, Sanz-Cortes, M, et al. Neurobehavioral outcomes in preterm, growth-restricted infants with and without prenatal advanced signs of brain-sparing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 288–94.Google Scholar PubMed

Llurba, E, Baschat, AA, Turan, OM, Harding, J, McCowan, LM. Childhood cognitive development after fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 383–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Savchev, S, Sanz-Cortes, M, Cruz-Martinez, R, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of full-term small-for-gestational-age infants with normal placental function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 201–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Van Wyk, L, Boers, KE, Van Der Post, JAM, et al. Effects on (neuro)developmental and behavioral outcome at 2 years of age of induced labor compared with expectant management in intrauterine growth-restricted infants: long-term outcomes of the DIGITAT trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 406.e1–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Weiner, CP. Umbilical artery Doppler screening for detection of the small fetus in need of antepartum surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 154–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spellacy, WN, Miller, S, Winegar, A, Peterson, PQ. Macrosomia: maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 158–61.Google Scholar PubMed

Menticoglou, SM, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR. Must macrosomic fetuses be delivered by a caesarean section? A review of outcome for 786 babies greater than or equal to 4,500 g. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 32: 100–3.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lipscomb, KR, Gregory, K, Shaw, K. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles county + University of Southern California experience. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 558–64.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Babinszki, A, Kerenyi, T, Torok, O, et al. Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: Effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 669–74.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dooley, SL, Metzger, BE, Cho, NH. Gestational diabetes mellitus: influence of race on disease prevalence and perinatal outcome in a U.S. population. Diabetes 1991; 40 (Suppl 2): 25–9.Google Scholar

Okun, N, Verma, A, Mitchell, BF, Flowerdew, G. Relative importance of maternal constitutional factors and glucose intolerance of pregnancy in the development of newborn macrosomia. J Matern Fetal Med 1997; 6: 285–90.Google Scholar PubMed

Black, MH, Sacks, DA, Xiang, AH, Lawrence, JM. The relative contribution of prepregnancy overweight and obesity, gestational weight gain, and IADPSG-defined gestational diabetes mellitus to fetal overgrowth. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 56–62.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gaudet, L, Ferraro, ZM, Wen, SW, Walker, M. Maternal obesity and occurrence of fetal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 640291.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cogswell, ME, Serdula, MK, Hungerford, DW, Yip, R. Gestational weight gain among average-weight and overweight women–what is excessive? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 705–12.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ogunyemi, D, Hullett, S, Leeper, J, Risk, A. Prepregnancy body mass index, weight gain during pregnancy, and perinatal outcome in a rural black population. J Matern Fetal Med 1998; 7: 190–3.Google Scholar

Lazer, S, Biale, Y, Mazor, M, Lewenthal, H, Insler, V. Complications associated with the macrosomic fetus. J Reprod Med 1986; 31: 501–5.Google Scholar PubMed

Klebanoff, MA, Mills, JL, Berendes, HW. Mother’s birth weight as a predictor of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 253–7.Google Scholar PubMed

Langer, O, Levy, J, Brustman, L, et al. Glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus–how tight is tight enough: small for gestational age versus large for gestational age? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 646–53.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Carpenter, MW, Canick, JA, Hogan, JW, et al. Amniotic fluid insulin at 14–20 weeks’ gestation: Association with later maternal glucose intolerance and birth macrosomia. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1259–63.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Metzger, BE, Lowe, LP, Dyer, AR, et al.; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1991–2002.Google Scholar PubMed

Nasrat, H, Abalkhail, B, Fageeh, W, Shabat, A, El Zahrany, F. Anthropometric measurements of newborns of gestational diabetic mothers: does it indicate disproportionate fetal growth? J Matern Fetal Med 1997; 6: 291–5.Google Scholar PubMed

McFarland, MB, Trylovich, CG, Langer, O. Anthropometric differences in macrosomic infants of diabetic and nondiabetic mothers. J Matern Fetal Med 1998; 7: 292–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ferber, A. Maternal complications of fetal macrosomia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 335–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boulet, SL, Alexander, GR, Salihu, HM, Pass, M. Macrosomic births in the United States: Determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1372–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Perlow, JH, Wigton, T, Hart, J, et al. Birth trauma. A five-year review of incidence and associated perinatal factors. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 754–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Acker, DB, Gregory, KD, Sachs, BP, Friedman, EA. Risk factors for Erb-Duchenne palsy. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 389–92.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ecker, JL, Greenberg, JA, Norwitz, ER, Nadel, AS, Repke, JT. Birth weight as a predictor of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 643–7.CrossRef Google Scholar

Esakoff, TF, Cheng, YW, Sparks, TN, Caughey, AB. The association between birthweight 4000 g or greater and perinatal outcomes in patients with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 672.e1–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chez, RA, Carlan, S, Greenberg, SL, Spellacy, WN. Fractured clavicle is an unavoidable event. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 797–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gherman, RB, Ouzounian, JG, Goodwin, TM. Brachial plexus palsy: an in utero injury? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1303–7.Google Scholar PubMed

Bérard, J, Dufour, P, Vinatier, D, Subtil, D, Vanderstichèle, S, Monnier, JC, et al. Fetal macrosomia: Risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 77: 51–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Catalano, PM, Ehrenberg, HM. The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring. BJOG 2006; 113: 1126–33.Google Scholar

Stones, RW, Paterson, CM, Saunders, NJ. Risk factors for major obstetric haemorrhage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993; 48: 15–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

El Madany, AA, Jallad, KB, Radi, FA, El Hamdan, H, O’deh, HM. Shoulder dystocia: Anticipation and outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991; 34: 7–12.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Harman, CR, Farid, G, Chodirker, BN, Evans, JA. Very low second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein: Association with high birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 531–6.Google Scholar PubMed

Wikström, I, Bergström, R, Bakketeig, L, Jacobsen, G, Lindmark, G. Prediction of high birthweight from maternal characteristics, symphysis fundal height and ultrasound biometry. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1993; 35: 27–33.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neilson, JP. Symphysis–fundal height measurement in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000944.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gonen, R, Spiegel, D, Abend, M. Is macrosomia predictable, and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable? Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 526–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chauhan, SP, Hendrix, NW, Magann, EF, et al. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: Experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 72–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chauhan, SP, Sullivan, CA, Lutton, TC, Magann, EF, Morrison, JC. Parous patients’ estimate of birth weight in postterm pregnancy. J Perinatol 1995; 15: 192–4.Google Scholar PubMed

Sherman, DJ, Arieli, S, Tovbin, J, Siegel, G, Caspi, E, Bukovsky, I. A comparison of clinical and ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 212–17.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chauhan, SP, Cowan, BD, Magann, EF, Bradford, TH, Roberts, WE, Morrison, JC. Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: clinical versus 8 sonographic models. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35: 266–70.Google Scholar PubMed

Benacerraf, BR, Gelman, R, Frigoletto, FD. Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 1118–21.Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, GC, Smith, MF, McNay, MB, Fleming, JE. The relation between fetal abdominal circumference and birthweight: findings in 3512 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 186–90.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

O’Reilly-Green, CP, Divon, MY. Receiver operating characteristic curves of sonographic estimated fetal weight for prediction of macrosomia in prolonged pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 403–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alsulyman, OM, Ouzounian, JG, Kjos, SL. The accuracy of intrapartum ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 503–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rigano, S, Ferrazzi, E, Radaelli, T, Cetin, ET, Pardi, G. Sonographic measurements of subcutaneous fetal fat in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes and in normal pregnancies. Croat Med J 2000; 41: 240–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Combs, CA, Jaekle, RK, Rosenn, B, Pope, M, Miodovnik, M, Siddiqi, TA. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 365–70.Google Scholar PubMed

Hawkins, JS, Casey, BM, Lo, JY, Moss, K, McIntire, DD, Leveno, KJ. Weekly compared with daily blood glucose monitoring in women with diet-treated gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 1307–12.

Gonen, O, Rosen, DJD, Dolfin, Z, et al. Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 913–17.

Sanchez-Ramos, L, Bernstein, S, Kaunitz, AM. Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 997–1002.

Rouse, DJ, Owen, J, Goldenberg, RL, Cliver, SP. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996; 276: 1480–6.

Flamm, BL, Goings, JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication? Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 694–7.

Brace, RA. Physiology of amniotic fluid volume regulation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 40: 280–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gulbis, B, Jauniaux, E, Cotton, F, Stordeur, P. Protein and enzyme patterns in the fluid cavities of the first trimester gestational sac: relevance to the absorptive role of secondary yolk sac. Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4: 857–62.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Campbell, J, Wathen, N, Perry, G, et al. The coelomic cavity: an important site of materno-fetal nutrient exchange in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 765–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Campbell, J, Wathen, N, Macintosh, M, et al. Biochemical composition of amniotic fluid and extraembryonic coelomic fluid in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 563–5.Google Scholar PubMed

Brace, RA, Ross, MG. Amniotic fluid volume regulation. In Brace, RA, Hanson, MA, Rodeck, CH (eds), Fetus and Neonate, Volume 4: Body Fluids and Kidney Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 88.Google Scholar

Jang, PR, Brace, RA. Amniotic fluid composition changes during urine drainage and tracheoesophageal occlusion in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1732–41.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reddy, UM, Abuhamad, AZ, Levine, D, et al. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1070–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dildy, GA, Lira, N, Moise, KJ, Riddle, GD, Deter, RL. Amniotic fluid assessment: comparison of ultrasonographic estimates versus direct measurements with a dye dilution technique in human pregnancy. Am J Obset Gynecol 1992; 167: 986–94.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Magann, EF, Perry, KG, Chauhan, SP, et al. The accuracy of ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume in singleton pregnancies: the effect of operator experience and ultrasound interpretative technique. J Clin Ultrasound 1997; 25: 249–53.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (3): CD006593.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moore, TR, Cayle, JE. The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1168–73.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Magann, EF, Whitworth, NS, Klausen, JH, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography in evaluating amniotic fluid volume at less than 24 weeks’ gestation. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14: 895–7.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ippolito, DL, Bergstrom, JE, Lutgendorf, MA, Flood-Nichols, SK, Magann, EF. A systematic review of amniotic fluid assessments in twin pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 1353–64.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Locatelli, A, Zagarella, A, Toso, L, et al. Serial assessment of amniotic fluid index in uncomplicated term pregnancies: prognostic value of amniotic fluid reduction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 15: 233–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bromley, B, Harlow, BL, Laboda, LA, Benacerraf, BR. Small sac size in the first trimester: a predictor of poor fetal outcome. Radiology 1991; 178: 375–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tadmor, OP, Achiron, R, Rabinowiz, R, et al. Predicting first-trimester spontaneous abortion. Ratio of mean sac diameter to crown–rump length compared to embryonic heart rate. J Reprod Med 1994; 39: 459–62.Google Scholar PubMed

Nazari, A, Check, JH, Epstein, RH, Dietterich, C, Farzanfar, S. Relationship of small-for-dates sac size to crown–rump length and spontaneous abortion in patients with a known date of ovulation. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 369–73.Google Scholar PubMed

Dickey, RP, Olar, TT, Taylor, SN, Curole, DN, Matulich, EM. Relationship of small gestational sac-crown-rump length differences to abortion and abortus karyotypes. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 554–7.Google Scholar PubMed

Rowling, SE, Coleman, BG, Langer, JE, et al. First-trimester US parameters of failed pregnancy. Radiology 1997; 203: 211–17.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shipp, TD, Bromley, B, Pauker, S, Frigoletto, FD, Benacerraf, BR. Outcome of singleton pregnancies with severe oligohydramnios in the second and third trimesters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 108–13.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mercer, LJ, Brown, LG, Petres, RE, Messer, RH. A survey of pregnancies complicated by decreased amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 355–61.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chamberlain, PF, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR, Lange, IR. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. I. The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volumes to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 245–9.Google Scholar PubMed

Petrozella, LN, Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Leveno, KJ. Clinical significance of borderline amniotic fluid index and oligohydramnios in preterm pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 338–42.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Book contents

Section 3 - Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems

Summary

Access options

References

References

Further Reading

References

References