Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-45s75 Total loading time: 0.782 Render date: 2021-12-01T16:30:34.451Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

Rufus Willett
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Manoa
Guoliang Yu
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Higher Index Theory , pp. 561 - 574
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. F.. Stable Homotopy and Generalised Homology. University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Antonini, P., Azzali, S. and Skandalis, G.. The Baum–Connes conjecture localised at the unit element of a discrete group. arXiv:1807.05892, 2018.Google Scholar
Ara, P., Li, K., Lledó, F. and Wu, J.. Amenability and uniform Roe algebras. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 459(2):257306, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arveson, W.. A Short Course in Spectral Theory. Springer, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzhantseva, G. and Delzant, T.. Examples of random groups. Available at www.mat.univie.ac.at/%7Earjantseva/Abs/random.pdf, 2008.Google Scholar
Atiyah, M.. K-theory. W. A. Benjamin, 1967.Google Scholar
Atiyah, M.. Global theory of elliptic operators. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Functional Analysis and Related Topics, Tokyo, April 1969. University of Tokyo Press, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Atiyah, M.. Elliptic operators, discrete groups and von Neumann algebras. Asterisque, 32–33:4372, 1976.Google Scholar
Atiyah, M., Bott, R. and Shapiro, A.. Clifford modules. Topology, 3:338, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, M. and Schmid, W.. A geometric construction of the discrete series for semisimple Lie groups. Invent. Math., 42:162, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, M. and Segal, G.. The index of elliptic operators II. Ann. Math., 87(3):531545, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, M. and Singer, I.. The index of elliptic operators I. Ann. Math., 87(3): 484530, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, M. and Singer, I.. The index of elliptic operators III. Ann. Math., 87(3):546604, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, A.. Squeezing and higher algebraic K-theory. K-Theory, 28(1):1937, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, A.. K-theory and actions on Euclidean retracts. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Rio de Janeiro 2018. Vol. II. Invited lectures. World Scientific Publishing, 2018, pp. 10411062.Google Scholar
Bartels, A. and Bestvina, M.. The Farrell–Jones conjecture for mapping class groups. Invent. Math. 215(2):651712, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, A., Farrell, T., Jones, L. and Reich, H.. On the isomorphism conjecture in algebraic K-theory. Topology, 43:157213, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, A. and Lück, W.. The Borel conjecture for hyperbolic and CAT(0)-groups. Ann. Math., 175(2):631689, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, A., Lück, W. and Reich, H.. The K-theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture for hyperbolic groups. Invent. Math., 172(1):2970, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. and Connes, A.. Chern character for discrete groups. In Y. Matsumoto, T. Mizutani and S. Morita, eds., A Fête of Topology. Academic Press, 1988, pp. 163232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. and Connes, A.. Geometric K-theory for Lie groups and foliations. Enseign. Math. (2), 46:342, 2000 (first circulated 1982).Google Scholar
Baum, P., Connes, M. and Higson, N.. Classifying space for proper actions and K-theory of group C*-algebras. American Mathematical Society, 1994, pp. 241–291 (Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 167).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. and Douglas, R. G.. K-homology and index theory. In R. V. Kadison, ed., Operator Algebras and Applications, Part I. American Mathematical Society, 1982, pp. 117–173 (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 38).Google Scholar
Baum, P. and Douglas, R. G., Index theory, bordism, and K-homology. In R. G. Douglas and C. Schochet, eds., Operator Algebras and K-theory. American Mathematical Society, 1982, pp. 1–31 (Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 10).Google Scholar
Baum, P., Guentner, E. and Willett, R.. Expanders, exact crossed products, and the Baum–Connes conjecture. Ann. K-theory, 1(2):155208, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P., Guentner, E. and Willett, R.. Exactness and the Kadison–Kaplansky conjecture. In R. S. Doran and E. Park, eds., Operator Algebras and Their Applications. American Mathematical Society, 2016, pp. 1–33 (Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 671).Google Scholar
Baum, P., Higson, N. and Schick, T.. On the equivalence of geometric and analytic K-homology. Pure Appl. Math. Q., 3(1):124, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P., Higson, N. and Schick, T.. A geometric description of equivariant K-homology for proper actions. In E. Blanchard et al., eds., Quanta of Maths. American Mathematical Society, 2010, pp. 1–22 (Clay Mathematics Proceedings, vol. 11).Google Scholar
Bekka, B., Cherix, P.-A. and Valette, A.. Proper affine isometric actions of amenable groups. In S. C. Ferry, A. Ranicki, and J. M. Rosenberg, eds., Novikov Conjectures, Index Theory Theorems and Rigidity, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 1–4 (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series; vol. 227).Google Scholar
Berger, M.. A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry. Springer, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestvina, M., Bromberg, K. and Fujiwara, K.. Constructing group actions on quasi-trees and applications to mapping class groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 122:164, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestvina, M., Guirardel, V. and Horbez, C.. Boundary amenability of Out (F n ). arXiv:1705.07017, 2017.Google Scholar
Blackadar, B.. K-Theory for Operator Algebras, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 1998 (Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 5).Google Scholar
Blackadar, B.. Operator Algebras: Theory of C ∗ -Algebras and Von Neumann Algebras. Springer, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bökstedt, M., Hsiang, W. C. and Madsen, I.. The cyclotomic trace in algebraic K-theory of spaces. Invent. Math., 111(3):465539, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bott, R. and Tu, L.. Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology. Springer-Verlag, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, B. and Farah, I.. On the rigidity of uniform Roe algebras over uniformly locally finite coarse spaces. arXiv:1805.04236, 2018.Google Scholar
Bridson, M. and Haefliger, A.. Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature. Springer, 1999. (Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaft; vol. 319.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. S.. Cohomology of Groups. Springer, 1982. (Graduate Texts in Mathematics; vol. 87.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. G.. Stable isomorphism of hereditary subalgebras of C ∗ -algebras. Pacific J. Math., 71(2):335348, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. G.. The universal coefficient theorem for Ext and quasidiagonality. In Arsene, G., ed., Operator Algebras and Group Representations, vol. I (Neptun, 1980). Pitman, 1984, pp. 60–64 (Monographs and Studies in Mathematics; vol. 17).Google Scholar
Brown, L. G., Douglas, R. G. and Fillmore, P.. Extensions of C -algebras and K-homology. Ann. Math., 105:265324, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N. and Guentner, E.. Uniform embeddings of bounded geometry spaces into reflexive Banach spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 133(7):20452050, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N. and Ozawa, N.. C ∗ -Algebras and Finite-Dimensional Approximations. American Mathematical Society, 2008. (Graduate Studies in Mathematics; vol. 88.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, A., Echterhoff, S. and Willett, R.. Exotic crossed products and the Baum– Connes conjecture. J. Reine Angew. Math., 740:111159, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, G. and Pedersen, E.. Controlled algebra and the Novikov conjecture for K- and L-theory. Topology, 34(3):731758, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrión, J. and Dadarlat, M.. Almost flat K-theory of classifying spaces. J. Noncommut. Geom. 12(2):407-438, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabert, J. and Echterhoff, S.. Permanence properties of the Baum–Connes conjecture. Doc. Math., 6:127183, 2001.Google Scholar
Chabert, J., Echterhoff, S. and Nest, R.. The Connes–Kasparov conjecture for almost connected groups and for linear p-adic groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 97(1):239278, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabert, J., Echterhoff, S. and Oyono-Oyono, H.. Going-down functors, the Künneth formula, and the Baum–Connes conjecture. Geom. Funct. Anal., 14(3):491528, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S., Weinberger, S. and Yu, G.. Positive scalar curvature and a new index theory for noncompact manifolds. J. Geom. Phys., 149:22pp., 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Tessera, R., Wang, X. and Yu, G.. Metric sparsification and operator norm localization. Adv. Math., 218(5):14961511, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. and Wang, Q.. Ideal structure of uniform Roe algebras of coarse spaces. J. Funct. Anal., 216(1):191211, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Wang, Q. and Yu, G.. The maximal coarse Baum–Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a fibred coarse embedding into Hilbert space. Adv. Math., 249:88130, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. and Wei, S.. Spectral invariant subalgebras of reduced crossed product C ∗ -algebras. J. Funct. Anal., 197(1):228246, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coburn, L. A., Douglas, R. G., Schaeffer, D. G. and Singer, I.. C ∗-algebras of operators on a half-space II: Index theory. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 40(1):6979, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connes, A.. A survey of foliations and operator algebras. In R. V. Kadison, ed., Operator Algebras and Applications, Part I. American Mathematical Society, 1982, pp. 521–628 (Proceedings of the Symposium in Pure Mathematics; vol. 38).Google Scholar
Connes, A.. Non-commutative differential geometry. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 62(2):41144, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connes, A.. Cyclic cohomology and the transverse fundamental class of a folitation. In H. Araki and E. G. Effros, eds., Geometric Methods in Operator Algebras. Longman Scientific & Technical, 1986, pp. 52–144 (Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics; vol. 123).Google Scholar
Connes, A.. Noncommutative Geometry. Academic Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Connes, A. and Higson, N.. Déformations, morphismes asymptotiques et K-théorie bivariante. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 311:101106, 1990.Google Scholar
Connes, A., Gromov, Mikhael and Moscovici, H.. Conjecture de Novikov et fibrés presque plats. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 310(5):273277, 1990.Google Scholar
Connes, A., Gromov, Mikhael and Moscovici, H.. Group cohomology with Lipschitz control and higher signatures. Geom. Funct. Anal., 2(1):178, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connes, A. and Moscovici, H.. The L2 -index theorem for homogeneous spaces of Lie groups. Ann. Math., 115(2):291330, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connes, A. and Moscovici, H.. Cyclic cohomology, the Novikov conjecture and hyperbolic groups. Topology, 29(3):345388, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connes, A. and Skandalis, G.. The longitudinal index theorem for foliations. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 20:11391183, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortiñas, G.. Algebraic v. topological K-theory: A friendly match. In P. Baum and G. Cortiñas, eds., Topics in Algebraic and Topological K-theory, Springer Lecture Notes, 2008.Google Scholar
Cortiñas, G. and Tartaglia, G.. Operator ideals and assembly maps in K-theory. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 142:10891099, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuntz, J.. Generalized homomorphisms between C ∗ -algebras and KK-theory. In Ph. Blanchard and L. Streit, eds., Dynamics and Processes (Bielefeld 1981). Springer, 1983, pp. 31–45 (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1031).Google Scholar
Cuntz, J.. Noncommutative simplicial complexes and the Baum–Connes conjecture. Geom. Funct. Anal., 12(2):307329, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuntz, J., Meyer, R. and Rosenberg, J.. Topological and Bivariant K-theory. Birkhäuser, 2007 (Oberwolfach Seminars; vol. 36).Google Scholar
Cycon, H., Froese, R., Kirsch, W. and Simon, B.. Schrödinger Operators with Applications to Quantum Mechanics and Global Geometry. Springer, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadarlat, M.. Group quasi-representations and index theory. J. Topol. Anal., 4(3):297319, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadarlat, M. and Guentner, E.. Uniform embeddability of relatively hyperbolic groups. J. Reine Angew. Math., 612:115, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadarlat, M., Willett, R. and Localization, J. Wu. C ∗ -algebras and K-theoretic duality. Ann. K-theory, 3(4):615630, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, K.. C ∗ -algebras by Example. Fields Institute monographs, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. and Lück, W.. Spaces over a category and assembly maps in isomorphism conjectures in K- and L-theory. K-Theory, 15:201252, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M.. Groups generated by reflections and aspherical manifolds not covered by Euclidean space. Ann. Math., 117(2):293324, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeley, R. and Goffeng, M.. Realizing the analytic surgery group of Higson and Roe geometrically, part I: The geometric model. J. Homotopy Relat. Str., 12:109– 142, 2017.Google Scholar
Dixmier, J.. C ∗-Algebras. North Holland Publishing Company, 1977.Google Scholar
Douglas, R. G.. Banach Algebra Techniques in Operator Theory. Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Douglas, R. G.. C ∗ -algebra Extensions and K-homology. Princeton University Press, 1980 (Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 95).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dranishnikov, A., Ferry, S. and Weinberger, S.. Large Riemannian manifolds which are flexible. Ann. Math., 157:919938, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dranishnikov, A., Ferry, S. and Weinberger, S.. An étale approach to the Novikov conjecture. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 61(2):139155, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dranishnikov, A., Keesling, J. and Uspenskii, V. V.. On the Higson corona of uniformly contractible spaces. Topology, 37(4):791803, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitmar, A. and Echterhoff, S.. Principles of Harmonic Analysis. Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Eilenberg, S. and Steenrod, N.. Foundations of Algebraic Topology. Princeton University Press, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G., Natsume, T. and Nest, R.. The Atiyah–Singer index theorem as passage to the classical limit in quantum mechanics. Comm. Math. Phys., 182(3):505– 533, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, H.. Noncommutative Poincaré duality for boundary actions of hyperbolic groups. J. Reine Angew. Math., 564:133, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, H. and Meyer, R.. Dualizing the coarse assembly map. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 5:161186, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, H. and Meyer, R.. A descent principle for the Dirac dual Dirac method. Topology, 46:185209, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, D.. Proper isometric actions of Thompson’s groups on Hilbert space. Int. Math. Res. Not., 45:24092414, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, T. and Hsiang, W. C.. On Novikov’s conjecture for non-positively curved manifolds. Ann. Math., 113:199209, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, T. and Jones, L.. K-theory and dynamics I. Ann. Math., 124(2):531569, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, T. and Jones, L.. A topological analogue of Mostow’s rigidity theorem. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 2:257370, 1989.Google Scholar
Farrell, T. and Jones, L.. Classical aspherical manifolds. In CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, volume 75, 1990.Google Scholar
Farrell, T. and Jones, L.. Topological rigidity for compact non-positively curved manifolds. In R. Greene and S. T. Yau, eds., Differential Geometry: Riemannian Geometry. American Mathematical Society, 1993, pp. 229274 (Proceedings of the Symposium in Pure Mathematics, vol. 54).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, T. and Jones, L.. Rigidity for aspherical manifolds with π 1 ⊂ GLm (R). Asian J. Math., 2:215262, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, S., Ranicki, A. and Rosenberg, J.. A history and survey of the Novikov conjecture. In S. Ferry, A. Ranicki and J. Rosenberg, eds. Novikov Conjectures, Index Theorems and Rigidity, Volume I. Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 7–66 (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 226).Google Scholar
Ferry, S. and Weinberger, S.. Curvature, tangentiality, and controlled topology. Invent. Math., 105(2):401414, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, S. and Weinberger, S.. A coarse approach to the Novikov conjecture. In S. Ferry, A. Ranicki and J. Rosenberg, eds., Novikov Conjectures, Index Theory Theorems and Rigidity, Volume I. Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 147–163 (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 226).Google Scholar
Finn-Sell, M.. Fibred coarse embeddings, a-T-menability and the coarse analogue of the Novikov conjecture. J. Funct. Anal., 267(10):37583782, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn-Sell, M. and Wright, N.. Spaces of graphs, boundary groupoids and the coarse Baum–Connes conjecture. Adv. Math., 259:306338, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, B. and Wang, Q.. The equivariant coarse Baum–Connes conjecture for spaces which admit an equivariant coarse embedding into Hilbert space. J. Funct. Anal., 271(4):799832, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghys, E. and de la Harpe, P., editors. Sur les groupes hyperboliques d’après Mikhael Gromov. Birkhäuser, 1990 (Progress in Mathematics, no. 83).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, G., Wang, Q. and Yu, G.. Geometrization of the strong Novikov conjecture for residually finite groups. J. Reine Angew. Math., 621:159189, 2008.Google Scholar
Gong, G. and Yu, G.. Volume growth and positive scalar curvature. Geom. Funct. Anal., 10:821828, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, S., Wu, J. and Yu, G.. The Novikov conjecture, the group of volume preserving diffeomoprhisms and Hilbert–Hadamard spaces. arXiv:1811.02086, 2018.Google Scholar
Grigorchuk, R.. Degrees of growth of finitely generated groups and the theory of invariant means. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 48(2):939985, 1984.Google Scholar
Gromov, M.. Asymptotic invariants of infinite groups. In G. Niblo and M. Roller, eds., Geometric Group Theory, volume 2, pp. 1–295. Cambridge University Press, 1993. London Math Society Lecture Notes vol. 182.Google Scholar
Gromov, M.. Random walks in random groups. Geom. Funct. Anal., 13(1): 73146, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guentner, E., Higson, N. and Trout, J.. Equivariant E-theory. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 148(703), 2000.Google Scholar
Guentner, E., Higson, N. and Weinberger, S.. The Novikov conjecture for linear groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 101:243268, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guentner, E. and Kaminker, J.. Exactness and the Novikov conjecture. Topology, 41(2):411418, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guentner, E., Tessera, R. and Yu, G.. Operator norm localization for linear groups and its applications to K-theory. Adv. Math., 226(4):34953510, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guentner, E., Tessera, R. and Yu, G.. A notion of geometric complexity and its application to topological rigidity. Invent. Math., 189(2):315357, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guentner, E., Willett, R. and Yu, G.. Finite dynamical complexity and controlled operator K-theory. arXiv:1609.02093, 2016.Google Scholar
Guentner, E., Willett, R. and Yu, G.. Dynamic asymptotic dimension: relation to dynamics, topology, coarse geometry, and C ∗ -algebras. Math. Ann., 367(1): 785829, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haagerup, U. and Kraus, J.. Approximation properties for group C ∗ -algebras and group von Neumann algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 344:667699, 1994.Google Scholar
Hamenstädt, U.. Geometry of the mapping class groups. I. Boundary amenability. Invent. Math., 175(3):545609, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanke, B. and Schick, T.. Enlargeability and index theory. J. Differential Geometry, 74(2):293320, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanke, B. and Schick, T.. The strong Novikov conjecture for low degree cohomology. Geometriae Dedicata, 135:119127, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, A.. Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Higson, N.. C ∗-algebra extension theory and duality. J. Funct. Anal., 129: 349363, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N.. The Baum–Connes conjecture. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Volume II (Berlin 1998). Doc. Math., Extra Vol. II, 637–646, 1998.Google Scholar
Higson, N.. Counterexamples to the coarse Baum–Connes conjecture. Unpublished paper, Pennsylvania State University. Available at http://www.personal.psu.edu/ndh2/math/Unpublished files/Higson%20-%201999%20-%20Counter examples%20to%20the%20coarse%20Baum-Connes%20conjecture.pdfGoogle Scholar
Higson, N.. Bivariant K-theory and the Novikov conjecture. Geom. Funct. Anal., 10:563581, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N. and Guentner, E.. Group C ∗ -algebras and K-theory. In S. Doplicher and R. Longo, eds., Noncommutative Geometry. Springer, 2004, pp. 137–252 (Springer Lecture Notes, no. 1831).Google Scholar
Higson, N. and Kasparov, G.. E-theory and KK-theory for groups which act properly and isometrically on Hilbert space. Invent. Math., 144:2374, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N., Kasparov, G. and Trout, J.. A Bott periodicity theorem for infinite dimensional Hilbert space. Adv. Math., 135:140, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N., Lafforgue, V. and Skandalis, G.. Counterexamples to the Baum– Connes conjecture. Geom. Funct. Anal., 12:330354, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N., Pedersen, E. and Roe, J.. C ∗ -algebras and controlled topology. K-Theory, 11:209239, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N. and Roe, J.. On the coarse Baum–Connes conjecture. In S. C. Ferry, A. Ranicki, and J. M. Rosenberg, eds., Novikov Conjectures, Index Theory Theorems and Rigidity, vol. 2. London Mathematical Society, 1995, pp. 227–254 (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 227).Google Scholar
Higson, N. and Roe, J.. Amenable group actions and the Novikov conjecture. J. Reine Angew. Math., 519:143153, 2000.Google Scholar
Higson, N. and Roe, J.. Analytic K-homology. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Higson, N. and Roe, J.. Mapping surgery to analysis I: Analytic signatures. K-theory, 33:277299, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N. and Roe, J.. Mapping surgery to analysis II: Geometric signatures. K-theory, 33:301324, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N. and Roe, J.. Mapping surgery to analysis III: Exact sequences. K-theory, 33:325346, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N., Roe, J. and Yu, G.. A coarse Mayer–Vietoris principle. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 114:8597, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilsum, M. and Skandalis, G.. Invariance par homotopie de la signature á coefficients dans un fibré presque plat. J. Reine Angew. Math., 423:7399, 1992.Google Scholar
Hitchin, N.. Harmonic spinors. Adv. Math., 14:155, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörmander, L.. The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III: Pseudo-Differential Operators. Springer, 1994 (Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wis-senschaften, vol. 274).Google Scholar
Hsiang, W. C.. Geometric applications of algebraic K-theory. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematics, Volumes 1,2 (Warsaw 1983). PWN, 1984, pp. 98–118, 1983.Google Scholar
Hunger, B.. Almost flat bundles and homological invariance of infinite K-area. arXiv:1607.07820, 2016.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. B. and N. L. Randrianarivony. l p (p > 2) does not coarsely embed into a Hilbert space. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 4(4):1045–1050, 2006.Google Scholar
Kaminker, J. and Miller, J. G.. Homotopy invariance of the analytic index of signature operators over C ∗ -algebras. J. Operat. Theor., 14(1):113127, 1985.Google Scholar
Karoubi, M.. K-theory. Springer, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasparov, G.. Topological invariants of elliptic operators I: K-homology. Math. USSR-Izv., 9(4):751792, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasparov, G.. Equivariant KK-theory and the Novikov conjecture. Invent. Math., 91(1):147201, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasparov, G.. K-theory, group C ∗ -algebras, and higher signatures (conspectus). In S. Ferry, A. Ranicki and J. Rosenberg, eds., Novikov Conjectures, Index Theory Theorems and Rigidity, Volume I. Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 101–147 (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 226).Google Scholar
Kasparov, G. and Skandalis, G.. Groups acting on buildings, operator K-theory and Novikov’s conjecture. K-theory, 4:303337, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasparov, G. and Skandalis, G.. Groups acting properly on “bolic” spaces and the Novikov conjecture. Ann. Math., 158(1):165206, June 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasparov, G. and Yu, G.. The coarse geometric Novikov conjecture and uniform convexity. Adv. Math., 206(1):156, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasparov, G. and Yu, G.. The Novikov conjecture and geometry of Banach space. Geom. Topol., 16:18591880, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesling, J.. The one-dimensional Čech cohomology of the Higson compactification and its corona. Topology Proc., 19:129148, 1994.Google Scholar
Kida, Y.. The mapping class group from the viewpoint of measure equivalence. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 916, 2008.Google Scholar
Kondo, T.. CAT (0) spaces and expanders. Math. Z., 271(1–2):343-355, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, Y.. The realtive Mischenko–Fomenko higher index and almost flat bundles. arXiv:1807.03181, 2018.Google Scholar
Lafforgue, V.. Banach KK-theory and the Baum–Connes conjecture. In D. Li, ed., Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematics, Vol. II (Beijing, 2002). Higher Ed. Press, 2002, pp. 795812.Google Scholar
Lafforgue, V.. Un renforcement de la propriété (T). Duke Math. J., 143(3): 559602, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafforgue, V.. La conjecture de Baum–Connes à coefficients pour les groupes hyperboliques. J. Noncommut. Geom., 6(1):1197, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafforgue, V. and de la Salle, M.. Non commutative Lp without the completely bounded approximation property. Duke Math. J., 160:71116, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lance, E. C.. Hilbert C ∗ -modules (A Toolkit for Operator Algebraists). Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, H. B. and Michelsohn, M.-L.. Spin Geometry. Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Leichtnam, E. and Piazza, P.. Spectral sections and higher Atiyah–Patodi–Singer index theory on Galois coverings. Geom. Funct. Anal., 8(1):1758, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, K. and Willett, R.. Low-dimensional properties of uniform Roe algebras. J. London Math. Soc., 97:98124, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. and Renault, J.. Cartan subalgebras in C ∗-algebras. Existence and uniqueness. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 372:19852010, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichnerowicz, A.. Spineurs harmoniques. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 257:79, 1963.Google Scholar
Loday, J.-L.. K-théorie algébrique et représentations de groupes. Ann. Sci. École Norm. S., 9(3):309377, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lott, J.. Higher eta-invariants. K-theory, 6(3):191233, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubotzky, A.. Discrete Groups, Expanding Graphs and Invariant Measures. Birkhäuser, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lück, W.. The relationship between the Baum–Connes conjecture and the trace conjecture. Invent. Math., 149:123152, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lück, W. and Reich, H.. The Baum–Connes and Farrell–Jones conjectures in K- and L-theory. In E. Friedlander and D. Grayson, eds., Handbook of K-theory, volume 2. Springer, 2005, pp. 703842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusztig, G.. Novikov’s higher signature and families of elliptic operators. J. Differential Geometry, 7:229256, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathai, V.. The Novikov conjecture for low degree cohomology classes. Geometriae Dedicata, 99:115, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendel, M. and Naor, A.. Non-linear spectral caculus and super-expanders. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 119(1):195, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, R. and Nest, R.. The Baum–Connes conjecture via localisation of categories. Topology, 45(2):209259, March 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gromov, Mikhael. Spaces and questions. Geom. Funct. Anal., 2000, Special Volume, Part I, 118–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gromov, Mikhael and H. Blaine Lawson Jr. Spin and scalar curvature in the presence of a fundamental group. Ann. Math., 111(2):209–230, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gromov, Mikhael and H. Blaine Lawson, Jr. Positive scalar curvature and the Dirac operator on complete Riemannian manifolds. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 58(1):295–408, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnor, J.. On axiomatic homology theory. Pacific J. Math., 12(1):337341, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnor, J.. Morse Theory. Princeton University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnor, J.. Introduction to Algebraic K-theory. Princeton University Press, 1971 (Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 72).Google Scholar
Mineyev, I. and The, G. Yu. Baum–Connes conjecture for hyperbolic groups. Invent. Math., 149(1):97122, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miščenko, A. S.. Infinite dimensional representations of discrete groups and higher signatures. Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser. Mat., 8(1):81106, 1974.Google Scholar
Moore, C. and Schochet, C.. Global analysis on foliated spaces, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006 (Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 9).Google Scholar
Moriyoshi, H. and Piazza, P.. Eta cocycles, relative pairings and the Godbillon– Vey index theorem. Geom. Funct. Anal., 22(6):17081813, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munkres, J.. Topology, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, 2000.Google Scholar
Murphy, G.. C ∗ -algebras and Operator Theory. Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Naor, A. and Mendel, M.. Metric cotype. Ann. Math., 168(1):247298, 2008.Google Scholar
Nishikawa, S.. Direct splitting method for the Baum–Connes conjecture. arXiv:1808.08298, 2018.Google Scholar
Noether, F.. Über eine klasse singulärer integralgleichungen. Math. Ann., 82(1-2): 4263, 1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novikov, S.. Topological invariance of rational classes of Pontrjagin (in Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 163:298300, 1965.Google Scholar
Novikov, S.. Algebraic construction and properties of Hermitian analogues of K-theory over rings with involution from the point of view of Hamiltonian formalism: Some applications to differential topology and to the theory of characteristic classes. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 34:253–288, 475–500, 1970.Google Scholar
Nowak, P. and G. Yu. Large scale geometry. European Mathematical Society, 2012 (EMS Textbooks in Mathematics).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osajda, D.. Small cancellation labellings of some infinite graphs and applications. arXiv:1406.5015, 2014.Google Scholar
Oyono-Oyono, H. and Yu, G.. K-theory for the maximal Roe algebra of certain expanders. J. Funct. Anal., 257(10):32393292, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono-Oyono, H. and Yu, G.. On quantitative operator K-theory. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 65(2):605–674, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono-Oyono, H. and Quantitative, G. Yu. K-theory and Künneth formula for operator algebras. J. Funct. Anal., 277(7):20032091, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono-Oyono, H., Yu, G. and Zhou, D.. Quantitative index, Novikov conjecture, and coarse decomposability. Preprint, 2019.Google Scholar
Ozawa, N.. Amenable actions and exactness for discrete groups. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 330:691695, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozawa, N.. Boundary amenability of relatively hyperbolic groups. Topol. Appl., 153:26242630, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paschke, W. L.. K-theory for commutants in the Calkin algebra. Pac. J. Math., 95:427437, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, G. K.. C ∗ -Algebras and their Automorphism Groups. Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Pflaum, M., Posthuma, H. and Tang, X.. The transverse index theorem for proper cocompact actions of Lie groupoids. J. Differ. Geom., 99(3):443472, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, P. and Schick, T.. Rho-classes, index theory, and Stolz’ positive scalar curvature sequence. J. Topol., 4:9651004, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimsner, M. and Voiculescu, D.-V.. Exact sequences for K-groups and Ext-groups of certain crossed product C ∗ -algebras. J. Operat. Theor., 4(1):93118, 1980.Google Scholar
Qiao, Y. and Roe, J.. On the localization algebra of Guoliang Yu. Forum Math., 22(4):657665, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raeburn, I. and Williams, D.. Morita Equivalence and Continuous Trace C ∗ -algebras. American Mathematical Society, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramras, D. A., Tessera, R. and Yu, G.. Finite decomposition complexity and the integral Novikov conjecture for higher algebraic K-theory. J. Reine Angew. Math., 694:129178, 2014.Google Scholar
Reed, M. and Simon, B.. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis, revised and enlarged edition. Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Roe, J.. An index theorem on open mainfolds, I. J. Differ. Geom., 27:87113, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J.. An index theorem on open mainfolds, II. J. Differ. Geom., 27:115136, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J.. Coarse cohomology and index theory on complete Riemannian manifolds. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 104(497), 1993.Google Scholar
Roe, J.. From foliations to coarse geometry and back. In X. Masa and J. A. Alvarez López, eds., Analysis and geometry in foliated manifolds (Santiago de Compostela, 1994). World Scientific, 1995, pp. 195205.Google Scholar
Roe, J.. Index Theory, Coarse Geometry and Topology of Manifolds. American Mathematical Society, 1996 (CBMS Conference Proceedings, vol. 90).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J.. Elliptic Operators, Topology and Asymptotic Methods, 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall, 1998.Google Scholar
Roe, J.. Lectures on Coarse Geometry. American Mathematical Society, 2003 (University Lecture Series, vol. 31).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J.. Hyperbolic groups have finite asymptotic dimension. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 133(9):24892490, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J. and Willett, R.. Ghostbusting and property A. J. Funct. Anal., 266(3):16741684, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rørdam, M., Larsen, F. and Laustsen, N.. An Introduction to K-Theory for C ∗ -Algebras. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, J.. C ∗ -algebras, positive scalar curvature, and the Novikov conjecture. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 58(1):197212, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, J.. Analytic Novikov for topologists. In S. Ferry, A. Ranicki, and J. Rosenberg, eds., Novikov Conjectures, Index Theory Theorems and Rigidity, Volume I. Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 338–368 (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 226).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J.. Algebraic K-theory and its applications. Springer, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, J.. Manifolds of positive scalar curvature: a progress report. In Cheeger, J. and Grove, K., eds., Surveys in Differential Geometry XI: Metric and Comparison Geometry. International Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J. and Schochet, C.. The Künneth theorem and the universal coefficient theorem for Kasparov’s generalized K-functor. Duke Math. J., 55(2): 431474, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, J. and Stolz, S.. Manifolds of positive scalar curvature. In G. E. Carlsson, R. L. Cohen, W. C. Hsiang and J. D. S. Jones, eds., Algebraic Topology and Its Applications. Springer, 1994, pp. 241–267 (Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 27).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sako, H.. Property A and the operator norm localization property for discrete metric spaces. J. Reine Angew. Math., 690:207216, 2014.Google Scholar
Sapir, M.. A Higman embedding preserving asphericity. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 27:142, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, T.. A counterexample to the (unstable) Gromov–Lawson–Rosenberg conjecture. Topology, 37(6):11651168, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoen, R. and Yau, S.-T.. Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three-dimensional manifolds of non-negative scalar curvature. Ann. Math., 110:127142, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoen, R. and Yau, S.-T.. On the structure of manifolds with positive scalar curvature. Manuscripta Math., 28:159183, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, L.. A short proof that Mn (A) is local if A is local and Fréchet. Internat. J. Math., 4(2), 1992.Google Scholar
Sela, Z.. Uniform embeddings of hyperbolic groups in Hilbert space. Isr. J. Math., 80(1-2):171181, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, L. and Wang, Q.. The coarse geometric Novikov conjecture for subspaces of non-postively curved manifolds. J. Funct. Anal., 248(2):448471, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, B.. Trace ideals and their applications, 2nd edition. American Mathematical Society, 2005.Google Scholar
Stolz, S.. Simply connected manifolds of positive scalar curvature. Ann. Math., 136(3):511540, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takesaki, M.. On the cross-norm of the direct product of C ∗ -algebras. Tohoku Math. J., 16(1):111122, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, X., Willett, R. and Yao, Y.-J.. Roe C ∗ -algebra for groupoids and generalized Lichnerowicz vanishing theorem for foliated manifolds. Math. Z. 290(3-4):13091338, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trout, J.. On graded K-theory, elliptic operators, and the functional calculus. Illinois J. Math., 44(2):194309, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, J.-L.. Remarks on Yu’s property A for discrete metric spaces and groups. B. Soc. Math. Fr., 129:115139, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J.. Continuous Geometry. Princeton University Press, 1998 (Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics and Physics).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Špakula, J. and Willett, R.. Maximal and reduced Roe algebras of coarsely embeddable spaces. J. Reine Angew. Math., 678:3568, 2013.Google Scholar
Špakula, J. and Willett, R.. On rigidity of Roe algebras. Adv. Math., 249:289310, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, C.. Higher ρ-invariants and the surgery structure set. J. Topol., 6(1):154– 192, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, C. T. C.. Surgery on Compact Manifolds, 2nd edition. American Mathematical Society, 1999 (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 69).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B.-L. and Wang, H.. Localized index and L2 -Lefschetz fixed point theorem for orbifolds. J. Differ. Geom., 102(2):285349, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegge-Olsen, N. E.. K-Theory and C ∗ -Algebras (A Friendly Approach). Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Wei, S.. On the quasidiagonality of Roe algebras. Sci. China Math., 54: 10111018, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, C.. The K-book: An Introduction to Algebraic K-theory. American Mathematical Society, 2013 (Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 145).Google Scholar
Weinberger, S.. Aspects of the Novikov conjecture. In J. Kaminker, ed., Geometric and Topological Invariants of Elliptic Operators. American Mathematical Society, 1990, pp. 281–297 (Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 105).Google Scholar
Weinberger, S.. The Topological Classification of Stratified Spaces. University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Weinberger, S.. Variations on a theme of Borel. Available at http://math.uchicago .edu/∼shmuel/VTBdraft.pdf, 2017.Google Scholar
Weinberger, S., Xie, Z. and Yu, G.. Additivity of higher rho invariants and nonrigidity of topological manifolds. arXiv:1608.03661, 2016. To appear, Comm. Pure. Appl. Math.Google Scholar
Weinberger, S. and Yu, G.. Finite part of operator K-theory for groups finitely embeddable into Hilbert space and the degree of nonrigidity of manifolds. Geom. Topol., 19(5):27672799, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. and Willett, R.. Cartan subalgebras in uniform Roe algebras. arXiv:1808.04410, 2018. To appear, Groups, Geom, Dyn.Google Scholar
Willett, R.. Some notes on property A. In G. Arzhantseva and A. Valette, eds., Limits of Graphs in Group Theory and Computer Science. EPFL Press, 2009, pp. 191281.Google Scholar
Willett, R. and Yu, G.. Higher index theory for certain expanders and Gromov monster groups I. Adv. Math., 229(3):13801416, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, R. and Yu, G.. Higher index theory for certain expanders and Gromov monster groups II. Adv. Math., 229(3):17621803, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, R. and Yu, G.. Geometric property (T). Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B, 35(5):761800, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, W. and Zacharias, J.. The nuclear dimension of C ∗ -algebras. Adv. Math., 224(2):461498, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, N.. C0 coarse geometry. PhD thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 2002.Google Scholar
Wright, N.. Simultaneous metrizability of coarse spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 139(9):32713278, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, C.. Coarse co-assembly as a ring homomorphism. J. Noncommut. Geom. 10(2):471514, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Z. and Yu, G.. Positive scalar curvature, higher rho invariants and localization algebras. Adv. Math., 262:823866, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Z. and Yu, G.. Higher rho invariants and the moduli space of positive scalar curvature metrics. Adv. Math., 307:10461069, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Z. and Yu, G.. Delocalized eta invariants, algebraicity, and K-theory of group C -algebras. arXiv:1805.07617, 2018. To appear, Int. Math. Res. Not.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, G.. Baum–Connes conjecture and coarse geometry. K-theory, 9(3):223231, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, G.. Coarse Baum–Connes conjecture. K-theory, 9:199221, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, G.. Localization algebras and the coarse Baum–Connes conjecture. K-theory, 11(4):307318, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The, G. Yu. Novikov conjecture for groups with finite asymptotic dimension. Ann. Math., 147(2):325355, 1998.Google Scholar
Yu, G.. The coarse Baum–Connes conjecture for spaces which admit a uniform embedding into Hilbert space. Invent. Math., 139(1):201240, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, G.. The algebraic K-theory Novikov conjecture for group algebras over the ring of Schatten class operators. Adv. Math., 307:727753, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharias, J.. On the invariant translation approximation property for discrete groups. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 134(7):19091916, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeidler, R.. Secondary large-scale index theory and positive scalar curvature. PhD thesis, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, 2016.Google Scholar
Zenobi, V. F.. Mapping the surgery exact sequence for topological manifolds to analysis. J. Topol. Anal., 9(2):329361, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W.. Positive scalar curvature on foliations. Ann. Math., 185:10351068, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar