Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T09:14:45.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic

from PART ONE - THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL EXTENSIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Nicholas Epley
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology Harvard University
Thomas Gilovich
Affiliation:
Psychology Department Cornell University
Thomas Gilovich
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Dale Griffin
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Daniel Kahneman
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

In what year was George Washington elected President? What is the freezing point of vodka? Few people know the answers to these questions, but most can arrive at a reasonable estimate by tinkering with a value they know is wrong. Most know that the United States declared its independence in 1776, so Washington must have been elected sometime after that. And most people also know that alcohol freezes at a lower temperature than water, so vodka must freeze at something colder than 32°F. To answer questions like these, in other words, people may spontaneously anchor on information that readily comes to mind and adjust their responses in a direction that seems appropriate, using what Tversky and Kahneman (1974) called the anchoring and adjustment heuristic. Although this heuristic is often helpful, adjustments tend to be insufficient, leaving people's final estimates biased toward the initial anchor value.

To examine this heuristic, Tversky and Kahneman (1974) developed a paradigm in which participants are given an irrelevant number and asked if the answer to a question is greater or less than that value. After this comparative assessment, participants provide an absolute answer. Countless experiments have shown that people's absolute answers are influenced by the initial comparison with the irrelevant anchor. People estimate that Gandhi lived to be roughly 67 years old, for example, if they first decided whether he died before or after the age of 140, but only 50 years old if they first decided whether he died before or after the age of 9 (Strack & Mussweiler, 1997).

Type
Chapter
Information
Heuristics and Biases
The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
, pp. 139 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×