Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-jb2ch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-28T09:41:52.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2023

Jacob McNulty
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Al-Azm, S. 1972. The Origins of KantOriArguments in the Antinomies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Alznauer, M. 2016. “Hegel’s Theory of Normativity.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association. Vol. 2, Issue 2. pp. 196–211.Google Scholar
Ameriks, K. 1985. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 46, Issue 1. pp. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K. 2000. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1975. “The First Person.” In: Gutenplan, S. D. ed. Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Ed. Barnes, J. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arndt, A., Iber, C., and Kruck, G. (eds.). 2006. Hegels Lehre vom Begriff, Urteil und Schluss. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, F. 1987. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. 2005. Hegel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. 2000. “Knowledge of Logic.” In: Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C. eds. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 229–254.Google Scholar
Bordignon, M. 2017. “Hegel: A Dialetheist? Truth and Contradiction in Hegel’s Logic.” Hegel Bulletin. Published Online September 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, B. 2013. Hegel and the Metaphysics of Absolute Negativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, M. 2020. “Kant on Logic and the Laws of the Understanding.” In: Miguens, S. ed. Logical Aliens. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 118–144.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning Representing and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2002. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bristow, W. 2007. Hegel and the Transformation of Philosophical Critique. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. 2006. The Logic of Hegel’s Logic. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. 2014. “Hegel’s Logic as Metaphysics.” Hegel Bulletin. Vol. 35, Issue 1. pp. 100–115.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. 1895. “What the Tortoise Said to Achilles.” Mind. Vol. 104, Issue 416. pp. 691–693.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1981. Trans. Haden, J. Kant’s Life and Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. 2020. “Idealism and the Philosophy of Mind.” In: Seager, W. ed. The Routledge Companion to Panpsychism. New York: Routledge. pp. 353–374.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. 1885. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. 2nd ed. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar
Conant, J. 1991. “The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege and the Tractatus.” Philosophical Topics. Vol. 20, Issue 1. pp. 115–180.Google Scholar
Crary, A. and Read, R. 2000. The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Boer, K. 2010a. “Hegel’s Account of Contradiction in the Science of Logic Reconsidered.Journal for the History of Philosophy. Vol. 48, Issue 3. pp. 345–373.Google Scholar
de Boer, K. 2010b. On Hegel: The Sway of the Negative. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
de Boer, K. 2011. “Transformations of Transcendental Philosophy: Wolff, Kant, and Hegel.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain. Vol. 32, Issue 1–2. pp. 50–79.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1994. Trans. Patton, P. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1987. Trans. Massumi, B. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1996. Trans. Spivak, G. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Descombes, V. 2014. Trans. Schwartz, S. The Institutions of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Doz, A. 1987. La logique de Hegel et les problèmes traditionnels de l’ontologie. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Düsing, K. 2009. Das Seiende und das Göttliche Denken. Hegels Auseinandersetzung mit der Antiken ersten Philosophie. Paderborn: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, C. 2016. “The Priority of Judging: Kant on Wolff’s General Logic.” Estudos Kantianos. Vol. 4, Issue 2. pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
Edgar, S. 2010. “Hermann Cohen.” Last revised September 17, 2015. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cohen/Google Scholar
Engels, F. 1947. Trans. Burns, E. Anti-Dühring. Herr Eugen Dühring’s Revolution in Science. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Ficara, E. 2015. “Contrariety and Contradiction: Hegel and the Berliner Neo-Aristotelismus.” Hegel-Studien. Vol. 49. pp. 39–55.Google Scholar
Ficara, E. 2016. “Hegel on the Interplay between Logic and Metaphysics.” In: de Laurentiis, A. ed. Hegel and Metaphysics. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. pp. 109–118.Google Scholar
Ficara, E. 2020a. The Form of Truth: Hegel’s Philosophical Logic. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ficara, E. 2020b. “Hegel and Priest on Revising Logic.” In: Baskent, C. and Ferguson, T. eds. Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency, Outstanding Contributions to Logic Series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 59–71.Google Scholar
Fichte, I. H. (ed.). 1971. Fichtes Werke. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. 1794–5. Wissenschaftslehre. In: Fichte, I. H. ed. (1971). Vol. 1/ 1982. Ed. and Trans. Heath, J. and Lachs, P. Science of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franks, P. 2005. All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1987. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1892. “On Concept and Object.” Reprinted in G. Frege. 1984. Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy. Ed. McGuinness, B. F. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. pp. 182–194.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1980. Foundations of Arithmetic. Trans. Austin, J. L. 2nd rev. ed. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1984. Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy. Ed. McGuinness, B. F. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F. 1965. Das Problem einer Einleitung in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1976. Trans. Smith, P. C. Hegel’s Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. 1973. Fact, Fiction, Forecast. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, P. 2019. “Aristotle on Non-Contradiction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First published 2007. plato.stanford.edu/entries/Aristotle-noncontradictionGoogle Scholar
Grier, M. 2001. Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. 1967. Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 1993. “Thought and Being: Hegel’s Critique of Kant.” In: Beiser, F. ed. Cambridge Companion to Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 171–210.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1971. Trans. Shapiro, J. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Hahn, S. 2007. Contradiction in Motion: Hegel’s Organic Concept of Life and Value. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. 1986. “From an Ontological Point of View: Hegel’s Critique of the Common Logic.” The Review of Metaphysics. Vol. 44, Issue 2. pp. 305–338.Google Scholar
Harrelson, K. 2009. The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Hatfield, G. 2003. “What Were Kant’s Aims in the Deduction?Philosophical Topics. Vol. 31, Issue 1. pp. 165–198.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1968. Gesammelte Werke, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2001a. Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse Teil 1: Logik. Werke. Vol. 13. Hamburg: F. Meiner/2010. Ed. and Trans. Brinkmann, K. and Dahlstrom, D. O. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline: Part 1, Science of Logic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2001b. Transcribed by Hegel, K. Ed. Rameil, U. and Lucas, H. C. Vorlesungen über die Logik, Berlin 1831. Hamburg: Meiner/2008. Trans. Butler, C. Lectures on Logic, Berlin, 1831. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2016/2020.Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophy. Werke. Vol. 30, 1–2. Hamburg: F. Meiner/1995. Trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H. Lectures on the History of Philosophy. 3 vols. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1984/1978/1981.Wissenschaft der Logik. Werke. Vols. 21, 11, 12. Hamburg: F. Meiner/2010. Trans. di Giovanni, G. Hegel’s Science of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1969. Identity and Difference. Trans. Stambaugh, J. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1984. Trans. Heim, M. The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2009. Trans. Gregory, W. T. and Unna, Y. Martin Heidegger: Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2010. Trans. Sheehan, T. Logic: The Question of Truth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heis, J. 2018. “Neo-Kantianism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neo-kantianism/Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 1960. Der Ontologische Gottesbeweis: Sein Probleme und Sein Geschichte in der Neuzeit. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 1965/66. “Hölderlin über Urteil und Sein. Eine Studie zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Idealismus.” Hölderlin-Jahrbuch, Yearbook 14. pp. 73–96.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 1972. Hegel Im Kontext. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 1997. Ed. Förster, E. The Course of Remembrance: Essays on Hölderlin and Others. Palo Alto: Stanford.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 2001. Ed. and Trans. Pacini, D. S. Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hölderlin, F. 1962. “Urteil und Sein.” Band 4. Sämtliche Werke. 6 Bände. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. 1972. Trans. O’Connell, M. J. et. al. “Traditional and Critical Theory.” In: Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Seabury. pp. 188–244.Google Scholar
Horstmann, R. P. 1990. Wahrheit aus dem Begriff: Eine Einführung in Hegel. Berlin: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Horstmann, R. P. 1995. “What’s Wrong with Kant’s Categories, Professor Hegel?” In: Robinson, H. ed. Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress, Memphis 1995, Vol. I. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press. pp. 1005–1015.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. 1986. Hegel, Nietzsche and the Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. 2006. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. 2011. “Essence, Reflexion and Immediacy in Hegel’s Science of Logic.” In: Houlgate, S. and Baur, M. eds. A Companion to Hegel. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 139–158.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. 2016a. “Hegel, Kant and the Antinomies of Pure Reason.” Kant Yearbook. Vol. 8, Issue 1. pp. 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlgate, S. 2016b. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant.” Hegel-Jahrbuch. Vol. 1. pp. 24–32.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. 2019. “Hegel’s Realm of Shadows: Logic as Metaphysics in Hegel’s Science of Logic by Robert Pippin.” Journal for the History of Philosophy. Vol. 57, Issue 4. pp. 765–766.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 2013. Ed. Moran, D. Logical Investigations Volume 2. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hylton, P. 1993. Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Iber, C. 1990. Metaphysik Absoluter Relationalität. Berlin: De Gruyter. Reprint.Google Scholar
Iber, C. 2016. “Hegels Begriff der Reflexion als Kritik am traditionellen Wesens – und Reflexionsbegriff.” In: Arndt, A. and Gruck, G. eds. Hegels “Lehre vom Wesen.” Hegel-Jahrbuch Sonderband. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 21–34.Google Scholar
Inwood, M. J. 1983. Hegel: Arguments of the Philosophers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacobi, F. H. 1994. Ed. and trans. Di Giovanni, G. The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, , I. 1902–. Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. Ak. Vol. 3–4. Berlin: De Gruyter/1999. Ed. and Trans. Guyer, P. and Wood, A. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, , I. 1902–. “Jäsche Logik.” Ak. Vol. 9. Berlin: De Gruyter/“Jäsche Logic.” In: Michael Young, J. ed. Kant’s Lectures on Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, , I. 1902–. Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik. Ak. Vol. 4. Berlin: De Gruyter/Ed. and Trans. Hatfield, G. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1902–. Immanuel Kant: Gesammelte Schriften. 29 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2003. “On the Introduction of Negative Magnitudes into Philosophy.” In: Walford, D. with Meerbote, R. eds. and trans. Theoretical Philosophy 1755–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 203–243.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1993. Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kimi, I. 2018. Thinking and Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knappik, F. 2013. “Hegel on Consciousness, Self-Consciousness, and Idealism.” International Yearbook of German Idealism. Vol. 11. pp. 145–168.Google Scholar
Knappik, F. 2016. “Hegel’s Essentialism: Natural Kinds and the Metaphysics of Explanation in Hegel’s Theory of ‘the Concept.’” European Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 24, Issue 4. pp. 760–787.Google Scholar
Koch, A. F. 2000. “Sein – Nichts – Werden.” In: Arndt, A. and Iber, C. eds. Hegels Seinslogik. Interpretationen und Perspektiven. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 140–158.Google Scholar
Koch, A. F. 2014. Die Evolution des logischen Raumes: Aufsätze zu Hegels Nichtstandard-Metaphysik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Koch, A. F. 2018. “Das Sein: Erster Abschnitt, die Qualität.” In: Quante, M. and Mooren, N. eds. Kommentar zu Hegels Logik. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. pp. 43–145.Google Scholar
Koch, A. F. 2019. “Robert Pippin on the Speculative Identity of Thinking and Being.” European Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 27, Issue 4. pp. 1048–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreines, J. 2006. “Hegel’s Metaphysics: Changing the Debate.” Philosophy Compass. Vol. 1. pp. 466–480.Google Scholar
Kreines, J. 2008. “Hegel: Metaphysics without Pre-Critical Monism.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain. Vol. 29, Issue 1/2. pp. 48–70.Google Scholar
Kreines, J. 2015. Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreines, J. 2016. “Fundamentality without Metaphysical Monism: Response to Critics of Reason in the World.” Hegel Bulletin. Vol. 39, Issue 1. pp. 138–156. Published Online October 17.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krohn, W. 1972. Die Formale Logik in Hegels Wissenschafts der Logik. München: C. Hanser.Google Scholar
Lau, C.-F. 2008. “The Aristotelian-Kantian and Hegelian Approaches to Categories.” The Owl of Minerva. Vol. 40, Issue 1. pp. 77–114.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. 1989. Trans. and ed. R. Ariew and D. Garber. Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 2001. On the Plurality of Worlds. Revised ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 2008. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. 2007. Trans. Simek, N. J. Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. 2013. “Kant and Hegel on the Moral Self” In: Emundts, D. ed. Self, World and Art. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 93–119.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. 2017. I, Me, Mine: Back to Kant, and Back Again. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, H. 2018. Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C. G. 2012. Ontologie der Selbstbestimmung: Eine Operationale Rekonstruktion von Hegels “Wissenschaft der Logik.” Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.Google Scholar
Martin, C. G. 2015. “Metaphysik als Logik.” In: Urbich, J. and Zimmer, J. eds. Metzler Handbuch Ontologie. Berlin: Springer. pp. 126–138.Google Scholar
Martin, W. 2003. “Nothing More or Less than Logic: General Logic, Transcendental Philosophy, and Kant’s Repudiation of Fichte’s Wissenschatselhre.” Topoi. Vol. 22, Issue 1. pp. 29–39.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 2009. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. 2016. “Transcendental Philosophy and Intersubjectivity: Mutual Recognition as a Condition for the Possibility of Self-Consciousness in § 1–3 of Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right.” European Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 24, Issue 4. pp. 788–810.Google Scholar
Melichar, G. 2020. Die Objektivität des Absoluten: Der ontologische Gottesbeweis in Hegels “Wissenschaft der Logik” im Spiegel der kantischen Kritik. Collegium Metaphysicum 23. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
Meyer, T. 2017. “Hegels Wesenslogisches Kausalitätskapitel als Identitätstheorie der Kausalität.” Hegel-Studien 51. Munich: F. Meiner Verlag. pp. 90–121.Google Scholar
Moss, G. 2020. Hegel’s Foundation Free Metaphysics: The Logic of Singularity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. 2016. “Hegel’s Metaphysics. The Absence of the Metaphysical Subject in Hegel’s Science of Logic.” In: de Laurentiis, A. ed. Hegel and Metaphysics. New York/Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 119–135.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. 2018. “Determination, Determinability, and the Structure of Ens: Baumgarten’s Ontology and Beyond.” In: Fugate, D. and Hymers, J. eds. Baumgarten and Kant on Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 23–41.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. 2014. The Mirror of the World: Subjects, Consciousness and Self-Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. 2019. The Primacy of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. 1994. Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. 2002. German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, T. 2017. Does History Make Sense? Hegel on the Historical Shapes of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. 1989. Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. 2017. “Hegel on Logic as Metaphysics” In: Moyar, D. ed. The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 199–219.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. 2018. The Realm of Shadows: Metaphysics as Logic in Hegel’s Science of Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 1976. One: Being an Investigation into the Unity of Reality and of Its Parts, Including the Singular Object Which is Nothingness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 1985. “Inconsistencies in Motion.” American Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 22, Issue 4. pp. 339–346.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 1989. “Dialectic and Dialethic.” Science and Society. Vol. 53, Issue 4. pp. 388–415.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 1995. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2006. In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. Reprint. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1948. “On What There Is.” Review of Metaphysics. Vol. 2, Issue 5. pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. Mathematical Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Redding, P. 1991. “Hegel’s Logic of Being and the Polarities of Pre-Socratic Thought.” The Monist. Vol. 74, Issue 3. pp. 438–456.Google Scholar
Redding, P. 1996. Hegel’s Hermeneutics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Redding, P. 1997. “Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.” Last revised August 4, 2015. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegelGoogle Scholar
Redding, P. 2007. Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Redding, P. 2014. “The Role of Logic Commonly-So-Called in Hegel’s Science of Logic.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Vol. 22, Issue 2. pp. 281–301.Google Scholar
Redding, P. 2015. “An Hegelian Solution to a Tangle of Problems Facing Brandom’s Analytic Pragmatism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Vol. 23, Issue 4. pp. 657–680.Google Scholar
Redding, P. 2019a. “Hegel and the Tractarian Conception of Judgment.” In: , cha, J. and Berg, A. eds. Wittgenstein and Hegel: Reevaluation of Difference. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Redding, P. 2019b. “Hegel’s Treatment of Predication Considered in the Light of a Logic for the Actual World.” Hegel Bulletin. Vol. 40, Issue 1. pp. 51–73.Google Scholar
Redding, P. 2019c. “An Hegelian Actualist Alternative to Naturalism.” In: Giladi, P. ed. Responses to Naturalism: Critical Perspectives from Idealism and Pragmatism. London: Routledge. pp. 120–143.Google Scholar
Redding, P. and Bubbio, P. 2014. “Hegel and the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God.” Religious Studies. Vol. 50, Issue 4. pp. 161–181.Google Scholar
Reich, K. 1992. Trans. Kneller, J. and Losonsky, M. The Completeness of Kant’s Table of Judgments. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricketts, T. 1985. “Frege, the Tractatus, and the Logocentric Predicament.” Nous. Vol. 19, Issue 1. pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Rödl, S. 2007. “Eliminating Externality.” In Ameriks, K. and Stolzenberg, J. eds. Metaphysik im Deutschen Idealismus/Metaphysics in German Idealism. Vol. 5 of Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 176–188.Google Scholar
Rödl, S. 2018. Self-Consciousness and Objectivity: An Introduction to Absolute Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. 1982. Hegel’s Dialectic and Its Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. 1988. “From Vorstellung to Thought: Is a ‘Non-Metaphysical’ View of Hegel Possible?” In: Horstmann, R. P. and Henrich, D. eds. Stuttgarter Hegelkongress 1987: Metaphysik nach Kant? Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. pp. 248–262.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 2015. Principles of Mathematics. Routledge Classics. Reprint. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schick, F. 2002. “Die Urteilslehre.” In: Schick, F. and Koch, A. F. eds. G.W.F. Hegel: Wissenschaft der Logik. Klassiker Auslegen, Bd. 27. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. pp. 203–225.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, S. 1991. “Hegel’s Strategy and Critique of Kant’s Mathematical Antinomies.” History of Philosophy Quarterly. Vol. 8, Issue 4. pp. 423–440.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, S. 2012. Hegel’s Critique of Kant: From Dichotomy to Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. 2005. A Brief History of the Paradox: Philosophy and the Labyrinths of the Mind. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Stern, R. 1990. Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stern, R. 2009. Hegelian Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, R. 2016. “Kreines on the Problem of Metaphysics in Kant and Hegel.” Hegel Bulletin. Published Online October 17.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. 1996. The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1975. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tolley, C. 2006. “Kant on the Nature of Logical Laws.” Philosophical Topics. Vol. 34, Issue 1. pp. 371–407.Google Scholar
Tolley, C. 2017. “The Relation between Logic and Ontology in Kant.” In: Emundts, D. and Sedgwick, S. eds. International Yearbook of German Idealism, Vol. 12. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 75–98.Google Scholar
Tolley, C. 2019a. “The Subject in Hegel’s Absolute Idea.” Hegel Bulletin. Vol. 40, Issue 1. pp. 143–173.Google Scholar
Tolley, C. 2019b. “Hegel’s Conception of Thinking in His Logics.” In: Lapointe, S. ed. Logic from Kant to Russell. London: Routledge. pp. 73–101.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. 2009. “On the Interplay between Logic and Metaphysics.” Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations. Vol. 8. pp. 13–36.Google Scholar
Weiss, L. 2018. “Ground in a Teleological Sense: Meta-grounding in Hegel’s Science of Logic.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Werner, A. 2018. “Hegel on Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.” European Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 26, Issue 1. pp. 502–524.Google Scholar
White Beck, L. 1978. “Did the Sage of Königsberg Have No Dreams?” In: White Beck, L. ed. Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. pp. 38–60.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 2017. Hegel on the Proofs and the Personhood of God: Studies in Hegel’s Logic and Philosophy of Religion. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Winegar, R. 2016. “To Suspend Finitude Itself: Hegel’s Reaction to Kant’s First Antinomy.” Hegel Bulletin. Vol. 37, Issue 1. pp. 81–103.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 2005. Trans. Pears, D. and McGuinness, B. Tractatus Logico Philosophicus. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 2009. Ed. and Trans. Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, J. Philosophical Investigations. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, C. 2019. “The Province of Conceptual Reason: Hegel’s Post-Kantian Rationalism.” PhD dissertation, Marquette University. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/873Google Scholar
Wolff, M. 1981. Der Begriff des Widerspruchs. Eine Studie zur Dialektik Kant und Hegels. Berlin: Hain.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. 1986. “Über Hegels Lehre vom Widerspruch.” In: Henrich, D. ed. Hegels Logik: Formation und Rekonstruktion. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. pp. 107–128.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. 1995. Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel: Mit einem Essay über Frege’s Begriffschrift. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. 2013. “The Science of Logic.” In: de Laurenti, is, A. and Edwards, J. eds. The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Zambrana, R. 2015. Hegel’s Theory of Intelligibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zambrana, R. 2019. “Actuality in Hegel and Marx.” Hegel Bulletin. Vol. 40, Issue 1. pp. 74–91.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Jacob McNulty, University College London
  • Book: Hegel's Logic and Metaphysics
  • Online publication: 26 April 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067805.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Jacob McNulty, University College London
  • Book: Hegel's Logic and Metaphysics
  • Online publication: 26 April 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067805.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Jacob McNulty, University College London
  • Book: Hegel's Logic and Metaphysics
  • Online publication: 26 April 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067805.010
Available formats
×