Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-khjsh Total loading time: 1.453 Render date: 2022-01-24T01:00:55.573Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Chapter 10 - Monitoring and Evaluation

from Section II - Public Health Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2018

David Townes
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Health in Humanitarian Emergencies
Principles and Practice for Public Health and Healthcare Practitioners
, pp. 122 - 135
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP). (2006). Evaluating humanitarian action using the OECD-DAC criteria: an ALNAP guide for humanitarian agencies. London: Overseas Development Institute. Available at: www.alnap.org/resource/5253 (Accessed April 21, 2014).
Advanced Training Program on Humanitarian Action (ATHA). Humanitarian Space. Available at: www.atha.se/content/humanitarian-space (Accessed October, 28 2014).
Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., and Mabry, L. (2012). Real world evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints, 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bamrah, S., Mbithi, A., Muhenje, O., et al. (2009). The impact of post-election violence on HIV and other healthcare services, Kenya, January-February 2008. Nairobi, Kenya: Medical Outreach, Inc.Google Scholar
Borton, J. (2014). Twenty years on: The Rwandan genocide and the evaluation of the humanitarian response. Humanitarian Practice Network, Blogs and Articles, 6 April 2014. Available at: www.odihpn.org/the-humanitarian-space/news/announcements/blog-articles/twenty-years-on-the-rwandan-genocide-and-the-evaluation-of-the-humanitarian-response (Accessed May 13, 2014).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999, September). Framework for program evaluation in public health. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48(RR-11). Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Publications/mmwr/rr/rr4811.pdf (Accessed May 13, 2014).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008a). Data collection methods for program evaluation: focus groups. Eval Briefs, 13, 12. Available at: www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief13.pdf (Accessed July 1, 2014).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008b). Data collection methods for program evaluation: observation evaluation. Eval Briefs, 16, 12. Available at: www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief16.pdf (Accessed July 1, 2014).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Evaluation of a Blanket Supplementary Feeding Program in Two Counties in Kenya, August 2011 – March 2012. Available at: www.alnap.org/resource/9410 (Accessed June 19, 2014).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Evaluation reporting: A guide to help ensure use of evaluation findings. US Dept. of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, GA. Available at: www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/docs/Evaluation_Reporting_Guide.pdf (Accessed June 20, 2014).
Dabelstein, N. (1996). Evaluating the international humanitarian system: rationale, process and management of the joint evaluation of the international response to the Rwanda genocide. Disasters, 20(4), 287294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. Monitoring and evaluation: let’s get crystal clear on the difference, 14 Jan 2013. Available at: http://genuineevaluation.com/monitoring-and-evaluation-lets-get-crystal-clear-on-the-difference/ (Accessed July 30, 2014).
Emergency Capacity Building Project. (2007). Impact measurement and accountability in emergencies: The good enough guide. Oxfam; Oxford, UK. Available at www.ecbproject.org/resource/18044 (Accessed February 24, 2015).
Emergency Capacity Building Project. (2011). The Project. Available at: www.ecbproject.org/the-project/theproject (Accessed May 13, 2014).
EvalPartners: The International Evaluation Partnership Initiative. Ban Ki-moon: “All of us share a responsibility to strengthen the evaluation function”, April 16, 2013. Available at: http://mymande.org/evalyear/UNSG_Speech_Evaluation_EP (Accessed July 1, 2014).
Frechtling, J, (2002). The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation. The National Science Foundation: Arlington, VA. Available at: www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/nsf02057_4.pdf (Accessed July 1, 2014).Google Scholar
Hallam, A. (1998). Evaluating humanitarian assistance programmes in complex emergencies. Relief Rehab Network. Available at: www.odihpn.org/hpn-resources/good-practice-reviews/evaluating-humanitarian-assistance-programmes-in-complex-emergencies (Accessed May 13, 2014).
Hallam, A. (2011). Harnessing the power of evaluation in humanitarian action: An initiative to improve understanding and use of evaluation. Available at www.alnap.org/resource/6123 (Accessed October 27, 2014).
Humanitarian Accountability Partnership. (2014). The Core Humanitarian Standard. Available at: www.hapinternational.org/what-we-do/the-core-humanitarian-standard.aspx (Accessed May 13, 2014).
International Evaluation Partnership Initiative. (2014). 2015 declared as the International Year of Evaluation. Available at: http://mymande.org/evalyear (Accessed July 22, 2014).
MacDonald, G. (2013). Criteria for selection of high-performing indicators: a checklist to inform monitoring and evaluation. Available at: www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/evaluation-checklists (Accessed July 1, 2014).
MacDonald, G. (2014). Framework for program evaluation in public health: a checklist of steps and standards. Available at www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/evaluation-checklists (Accessed May 20, 2014).
Mathison, S., ed. (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MercyCorps. (October 2012). Analysis of host community-refugee tensions in Mafraq, Jordan. Available at http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/download.php?id=2958 (Accessed November 12, 2014).
Morinière, L. (2011). External evaluation of the Haiti emergency relief and response fund (ERRF), 2008–2011. Available at: https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/ERRF%20Haiti%20Evaluation%20Report.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2014).
Oliver, M. L. (2008). Evaluation of Emergency Response: Humanitarian Aid Agencies and Evaluation Influence. Public Management and Policy Dissertations, Department of Public Management and Policy, Georgia State University, Paper 23. Available at: http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/pmap_diss/23 (Accessed May 2, 2014).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—Development Assistance Committee. (1991). Principles for evaluation of development assistance. DAC High-Level Meeting, 3 and 4 December 1991, Paris. Available at: www.oecd.org/development/evaluation/2755284.pdf (Accessed June 20, 2014).
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development—Development Assistance Committee. (1999). Guidance for evaluation humanitarian assistance in complex emergencies. Available at: www.oecd.org/development/evaluation/2667294.pdf (Accessed May 13, 2014).
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development—Development Assistance Committee. (2002). Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management. Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/29/21/2754804.pdf (Accessed June 20, 2014).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—Development Assistance Committee. (2014). DAC criteria for evaluating development assistance. Available at: www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/daccriteriaforevaluatingdevelopmentassistance.htm (Accessed June 20, 2014).
Relief and Rehabilitation Network. (1996). The Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda: Study III Principal Findings and Recommendations, Network Paper 16. London: Overseas Development Institute. Available at: www.odihpn.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=2132 (Accessed May 13, 2014).
Sida, L., Gray, B., and Asmare, E. (2012). IASC real-time evaluation of the humanitarian response to the Horn of Africa drought crisis in Somalia. Available at: https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/IASC%20RTE%20Ethiopia%202012.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2014).
Smith, M. B. and Cosgrave, J. (2013). Evaluation of humanitarian action: Pilot guide. London: ALNAP. Available at: www.alnap.org/eha# (Accessed April 21, 2014).
Taylor-Powell, E. and Steele, S. (1996). Collecting evaluation data: an overview of sources and methods. U Wisconsin-Extension. Available at: http://learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs/g3658-4.pdf (Accessed July 1, 2014).
The Sphere Project. (2004). Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
The Sphere Project. (2011). Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing.
United Nations Evaluation Group. (2010). UNEG quality checklist for evaluation reports. Available at: www.unevaluation.org/document/detail/607 (Accessed March 27, 2015).
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2014a). Public health data: Balanced scorecard. Available at: www.unhcr.org/pages/49c3646ce0.html. (Accessed June 20, 2014).
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2014b). http://twine.unhcr.org/app/ (Accessed June 20, 2014).
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). (2014). Thematic areas: evaluations of humanitarian response [website]. Available at: www.unocha.org/what-we-do/policy/thematic-areas/evaluations-of-humanitarian-response/overview (Accessed June 20, 2014).
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation, 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, D. B., Caruthers, F. A., Shulha, L. M., et al. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×