Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-5rlvm Total loading time: 1.516 Render date: 2021-10-22T01:57:16.983Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

25 - Common Designs of CAD Studies

from Part V - Computational Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2018

Ehsan Samei
Affiliation:
Duke University Medical Center, Durham
Elizabeth A. Krupinski
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberdi, E., Povyakalo, A.A., Strigini, L., Ayton, P., Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Slack, R. (2005). Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation. Br J Radiol, 78 Spec No 1, S31–S40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Radiology (ACR) (2003). The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology.
Ballard-Barbash, R., Taplin, S.H., Yankaskas, B.C., Ernster, V.L., Rosenberg, R.D., Carney, P.A., Barlow, W.E., et al. (1997). Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 169, 10011008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlow, W.E., Chi, C., Carney, P.A., Taplin, S.H., D’Orsi, C., Cutter, G., Hendrick, R.E., et al. (2004). Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 18401850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beam, C.A., Layde, P.M., Sullivan, D.C. (1996). Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med, 156, 209213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beiden, S.V., Wagner, R.F., Doi, K., Nishikawa, R.M., Freedman, M., Lo, S.C., Xu, X.W. (2002). Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities: analysis of components of variance. Acad Radiol, 9, 10361043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birdwell, R.L., Ikeda, D.M., O’Shaughnessy, K.F., Sickles, E.A. (2001). Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology, 219, 192202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birdwell, R.L., Bandodkar, P., Ikeda, D.M. (2005). Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology, 236, 451457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brem, R.F., Baum, J., Lechner, M., Kaplan, S., Souders, S., Naul, L.G., Hoffmeister, J. (2003). Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 181, 687693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, H.P., Doi, K., Vyborny, C.J., Schmidt, R.A., Metz, C.A., Lam, K.L., Ogura, T., et al. (1990). Improvement in radiologists’ detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol, 25, 11021110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciatto, S., Ambrogetti, D., Collini, G., Cruciani, A., Ercolini, E., Risso, G., Rosselli Del Turco, M. (2006). Computer-aided detection (CAD) of cancers detected on double reading by one reader only. Breast, 15, 528532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cupples, T.E., Cunningham, J.E., Reynolds, J.C. (2005). Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 185, 944950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, J.C., Ilvento, C.C. (2006). Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 187, 2028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Destounis, S.V., DiNitto, P., Logan-Young, W., Bonaccio, E., Zuley, M.L., Willison, K.M. (2004). Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Radiology, 232, 578584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmore, J.G., Wells, C.K., Howard, D.H. (1994). Variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med, 331, 14931499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feig, S.A., Sickles, E.A., Evans, W.P., Linver, M.N. (2004). Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 12601261; author reply 1261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenton, J.J., Taplin, S.H., Carney, P.A., et al. (2007). Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med, 356, 13991409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freer, T.W., Ulissey, M.J. (2001). Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology, 220, 781786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, F.J., Astley, S.M., McGee, M.A., Gillan, M.G., Boggis, C.R., Griffiths, P.M., Duffy, S.W. (2006). Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology, 241, 4753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gromet, M. (2008). Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 190, 854859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gur, D., Sumkin, J.H., Rockette, H.E., et al. (2004). Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 185190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gur, D., Bandos, A.I., Fuhrman, C.R., Klym, A.H., King, J.L., Rockette, H.E. (2007). The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: changing the confidence ratings. Acad Radiol, 14, 4953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helvie, M.A., Hadjiiski, L., Makariou, E., et al. (2004). Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology, 231, 208214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, D.M., Birdwell, R.L., O’Shaughnessy, K.F., Sickles, E.A., Brenner, R.J. (2004). Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Radiology, 230, 811819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J., Murray, T., Thun, M.J. (2008). Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin, 58, 7196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, Y., Miglioretti, D.L., Metz, C.E., Schmidt, R.A. (2007). Breast cancer detection rate: designing imaging trials to demonstrate improvements. Radiology, 243, 360367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karssemeijer, N., Otten, J.D., Verbeek, A.L.M., Groenewoud, J.H., de Koning, H.J., Hendriks, J.H.C.L., Holland, R. (2003). Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology, 227, 192200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kegelmeyer, W.P., Jr., Pruneda, J.M., Bourland, P.D., Hillis, A., Riggs, M.W., Nipper, M.L. (1994). Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology, 191, 331337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoo, L.A., Taylor, P., Given-Wilson, R.M. (2005). Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom national breast screening programme: prospective study. Radiology, 237, 444449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, J.M., Nicholas, M.J., Mendel, J.B., Slanetz, P.J. (2006). Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 187, 14831491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, T., Xu, X.W., MacMahon, H., Metz, C.E., Doi, K. (1996). Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists’ performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology, 199, 843848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krupinski, E.A., Jiang, Y. (2008). Anniversary paper: evaluation of medical imaging systems. Med Phys, 35, 645659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marx, C., Malich, A., Facius, M., Grebenstein, U., Sauner, D., Pfleiderer, S.O., Kaiser, W.A. (2004). Are unnecessary follow-up procedures induced by computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in mammography? Comparison of mammographic diagnosis with and without use of CAD. Eur J Radiol, 51, 6672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metz, C.E. (1978). Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med, 8, 283298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metz, C.E. (1989). Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol, 24, 234245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moberg, K., Bjurstam, N., Wilczek, B., Rostgard, L., Egge, E., Muren, C. (2001). Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers. Eur J Radiol, 39, 104110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, M.J., Whaley, D.H., Brandt, K.R., Amrami, K.K. (2006). Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection – prospective evaluation. Radiology, 239, 375383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishikawa, R.M. (2006). Modeling the effect of computer-aided detection on the sensitivity of screening mammography. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) Digital Mammography. London: Springer, pp. 4653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisano, E.D., Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E., et al. (2005). Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med, 353, 17731783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R.A., Newstead, G.M., Linver, M.N., Eklund, G.W., Metz, C.E., Winkler, M.N., Nishikawa, R.M. (1998). Mammographic screening sensitivity of general radiologists. In: Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., van Erning, L. (eds.) Digital Mammography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 383388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaane, P., Kshirsagar, A., Stapleton, S., Young, K., Castellino, R.A. (2007). Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 188, 377384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taplin, S.H., Rutter, C.M., Lehman, C.D. (2006). Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 187, 14751482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, P., Given-Wilson, R.M. (2005). Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices. Br J Radiol, 78 Spec No 1, S26– S30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
te Brake, G.M., Karssemeijer, N., Hendriks, J.H. (1998). Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. Radiology, 207, 465471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, R.F., Metz, C.E., Campbell, G. (2007). Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. Acad Radiol, 14, 723748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren Burhenne, L.J., Wood, S.A., D’Orsi, C.J., Feig, S.A., Kopans, D.B., O’Shaughnessy, K.F., Sickles, E.A., et al. (2000). Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology, 215, 554562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, B., Shah, R., Wallace, L., Hakim, C., Ganott, M.A., Gur, D. (2002). Computer-aided detection in mammography: an assessment of performance on current and prior images. Acad Radiol, 9, 12451250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×