Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:27:30.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - World society and human rights: an event history analysis of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Christine Min Wotipka
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Education and (by courtesy) Sociology, Stanford University
Francisco O. Ramirez
Affiliation:
Professor of Education and Sociology, Stanford University
Beth A. Simmons
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Frank Dobbin
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Geoffrey Garrett
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

A worldwide human rights regime has emerged, expanded, and intensified throughout the twentieth century, especially in the post-Second World War era. This regime involves a global system of expanding organizations, social movements, conferences, rules, and discourse promoting the human rights of individuals. This regime is universalistic in aspiration: all humans are expected to be covered by the regime. This universalism involves a discursive and organizational reframing of the more limited and more varying national citizenship emphasis; human rights in principle accrue to all individuals, regardless of their citizenship or residency. And, a growing number of types of individual persons can press for their human rights: women, children, ethnic minorities, indigenous peoples, gays and lesbians, the elderly, the disabled, and the imprisoned. The content of the human rights at stake also expands, from the rights of “abstract individuals” to the rights of individual members of a specific collectivity, e.g. from suffrage to reproduction rights for women. Also on the rise is both worldwide attention to human rights abuses and violations and national displays of commitment to human rights principles and policies. These unexpected developments have increasingly been highlighted by scholars working within both the disciplines of international relations (e.g. Donnelly 1986; Finnemore and Sikkink 1998; Keck and Sikkink 1998; Hathaway 2002; Vreeland (forthcoming)) and macrosociology (Hafner-Burton and Tsutsui 2005; Tsutsui and Wotipka 2004; Smith 1995; Soysal 1994).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Paul David. 1984. Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, new edition. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Barrett, David B., Kurian, George Thomas, and Johnson, Todd M. 2001. World Christian Encyclopedia: A Comparative Survey of Churches and Religions in the Modern World, 2nd ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Joel. A. and Oliver, Christine. 1992. Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations. American Sociological Review 57: 540–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkovitch, Nitza. 1999. From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women's Rights and International Organizations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Boli, John and Thomas, George M., eds. 1999. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1986. Political Rights and Political Liberties in Nations: An Evaluation of Human Rights Measures, 1950 to 1984. Human Rights Quarterly 18: 567–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Glenn R. and Hannan, Michael T.. 2000. The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Glenn R. and Sevaminathan, Anand. 2000. Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the U.S. Brewing Industry. American Journal of Sociology 106 (3):715–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency. 2002. The World Factbook 2002. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.
Cheibub, Jose and Jennifer Gandhi 2004. Classifying Political Regimes: A Six-Fold Classification of Democracies and Dictatorships. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Chen, Martha Alter. 1996. Engendering World Conferences: The International Women's Movement and the U.N. In N.G.O.s, the U.N. and Global Governance, edited by Weiss, Thomas G. and Gordenker, Leon, 139–53. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Clark, Ann Marie, Friedman, Elisabeth J., and Hochstetler, Kathryn. 1998. The Sovereign Limits of Global Civil Society: A Comparison of N.G.O. Participation in U.N. World Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights, and Women. World Politics 51: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Wade M. 2005. Sovereignty Relinquished? Explaining Commitment to the International Human Rights Covenants, 1966–1999. American Sociological Review 70: 472–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Karen S. and Hegtvedt, Karen A.. 1983. Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality. Annual Review of Sociology 9: 217–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Oakes, David. 1984. Analysis of Survival Data. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G.. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Division for the Advancement of Women. 2003. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. United Nations.
Donnelly, Jack. 1986. International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis. International Organization 40: 599–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Technology Assessment Network. 2000. Science Policies in the European Union: Promoting Excellence through Mainstreaming Gender Equality. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Farer, Tom J. 1992. The United Nations and Human Rights: More Than a Whimper, Less Than a Roar. In Human Rights in the World Community: Issues and Action, 2nd ed., edited by Claude, Richard Pierre and Weston, Burns H., 227–43. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism. International Organization 50: 325–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52: 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, David John, Hironaka, Ann, and Schofer, Evan. 2000. The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review 65: 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Arvonne S. 1995. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (The Women's Convention). In Women, Politics, and the United Nations, edited by Winslow, Anne, 77–94. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Elvis E. 1994. Reconciling Conceptual and Measurement Problems in the Comparative Study of Human Rights. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 35: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2001. Annual Survey of Freedom Country Scores 1972–73 to 2000–01. Available from http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/ [accessed July 15, 2001].
Hafner-Burton, Emilie Marie. 2005. Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression. International Organization 59: 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie Marie, and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology 110: 1373–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanneman, Robert A. and Steinback, Robin L.. 1990. Military Involvement and Political Instability: An Event History Analysis 1940–1980. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 18: 1–23.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?The Yale Law Journal 111: 1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2006. CEDAW: The Women's Treaty.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 1990. The International Spread of Privatization Policies: Inducements, Learning, and Policy Bandwagoning. In The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization, edited by Suleiman, Ezra N. and Waterbury, John, 88–109. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Landman, Todd. 2005. Protecting Human Rights: A Comparative Study. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lauren, Paul Gordon. 1998. The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lechner, Frank J. and Boli, John. 2005. World Culture: Origins and Consequences. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Dongxiao and Boyle, Elizabeth Heger. 2001. Making the Case: The Women's Convention and Equal Employment Opportunity in Japan. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 42: 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. and Keith Jaggers. 2001. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–1999. Available at: www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/ [accessed February 1, 2002].
McAdam, Doug and Rucht, Dieter. 1993. The Cross-National Diffusion of Movement Ideas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528: 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O.. 1997. World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrett, Bryan and Hogg, Ian. 1989. Encyclopedia of the Second World. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Plattner, Margaret. 1995–96. The Status of Women under International Human Rights Law and the 1995 U.N. World Conference on Women, Beijing, China. Kentucky Law Journal 84: 1249–75.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Regimes and Economic Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco O., John W. Meyer, Christine Min Wotipka, and Gili S. Drori. 2002. Expansion and Impact of the World Human Rights Regime: Longitudinal and Cross-national Analyses over the Twentieth Century. Funded National Science Foundation grant.
Ramirez, Francisco O., Soysal, Yasemin, and Shanahan, Suzanne. 1997. The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women's Suffrage Rights, 1890 to 1990. American Sociological Review 62: 735–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jackie. 1995. Transnational Political Processes and the Human Rights Movement. Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change 18: 185–219.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Elissavet. 1995. Women's Rights and the United Nations. In Women's Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives, edited by Peters, Julie and Wolper, Andrea, 36–50. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stolte, John F. 1987. The Formation of Justice Norms. American Sociological Review 52: 774–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, David. 1994a. British and French Political Institutions and the Patterning of Decolonization. In The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State: New Methodologies and Approaches, edited by Janoski, T. and Hicks, A., 278–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, David. 1994b. Introduction to Event History Methods. In The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, edited by Janoski, Thomas and Hicks, Alexander M., 245–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, George M., Meyer, John W., Ramirez, Francisco O. and Boli, John. 1987. Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru and Wotipka, Christine Min. 2004. Global Civil Society and the International Human Rights Movement: Citizen Participation in International Human Rights Nongovernmental Organizations. Social Forces 83: 587–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuma, Nancy Brandon and Hannan, Michael T.. 1984. Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Union of International Associations. various years. Yearbook of International Organizations. Munich, Germany: K. G. Saur.
United Nations. 1995. The United Nations and Human Rights, 1945–1995. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 2000. Women's Indicators and Statistics Database Version 4, CD-ROM. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 2003a. Chapter IV. Human Rights (Multilateral treaties deposited with the Secretary-General). New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 2003b. Reservations. Division for the Advancement of Women. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 2003c. States Parties. Division for the Advancement of Women. New York: United Nations.
Vreeland, James Raymond. Forthcoming. CAT Selection: Why Governments Enter into the UN Convention against Torture. International Organization.
Weiss, Anita M. 2003. Interpreting Islam and Women's Rights: Implementing CEDAW in Pakistan. International Sociology 18: 581–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2001. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Wotipka, Christine Min and Kiyoteru Tsutsui. Forthcoming. Global Human Rights and State Sovereignty: Nation-States' Ratifications of International Human Rights Treaties, 1965–1999. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 19, Anaheim, CA.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×