Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-h4v4t Total loading time: 0.675 Render date: 2022-06-27T07:56:41.137Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

3 - The decision to privatize: economists and the construction of ideas and policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Bruce Kogut
Affiliation:
Bernstein Chair Professor, Business School Columbia University
J. Muir Macpherson
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Strategy, McDonough School of Business Georgetown University
Beth A. Simmons
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Frank Dobbin
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Geoffrey Garrett
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Privatization is the distribution of state-owned assets to private owners. This distribution can happen by permitting spontaneous privatization, as frequently witnessed in Central and Eastern Europe; by giving or selling vouchers to the population to be redeemed for shares; or by sales through stock markets, private placements, or managerial buyouts. Privatization witnessed a global explosion in the 1980s and 1990s. Brune (2006) estimates that privatization revenues amounted to $1.3 trillion between 1985 and 2001, not including the mass privatization programs of the transition economies. Bortolotti, Fantini, and Siniscalco (2001) report that the global share of value added by state-owned enterprises fell from 9 percent to 6 percent in the 1978–1991 period. Privatization has been, in summary, of historic economic importance, reflecting a changed view of the state and its role in national economies.

Why do countries decide to implement privatization programs at a given time? The orientation of political parties in power (Bortolotti, Fantini, and Siniscalco 2001), the legal orientation of an economy (La Porta et al. 1998), the speed of privatization (Lopez-de-Silanes et al. 1997), and concerns over budgetary control and international financial institutions (Brune, Garrett, and Kogut 2004) have been found to be consequential for the volume and value of privatization. This line of inquiry points to a more fundamental question: why should these factors matter now? Countries were in debt and had right-wing governments in previous decades without privatizing. These factors have fluctuated repeatedly over time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shair, Abu, Osama, J. A. R. 1997. Privatization and Development, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsden, Alice. 1992. Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, National Bureau of Economic Research, Conference Series, edited by Nelson, Richard R.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Babb, Sarah. 2001. Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bass, Frank M. 1969. A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables. Management Science 13: 215–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George, Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick. 2001. New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (1):165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biglaiser, Glen. 2002. The Internationalization of Chicago's Economics in Latin America. Economic Development and Cultural Change 50: 269–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockman, Johanna and Eyal, Gil. 2001. Eastern Europe as a Laboratory for Economic Knowledge: The Transnational Roots of Neoliberalism. American Journal of Sociology 108: 310–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1997. Privatizing the Public Business Sector in the Eighties. British Journal of Political Science 27: 473–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortolotti, Bernardo, Marcella Fantini, and Domenico Siniscalco. 2001. Privatization: Politics, Institutions and Financial Markets. FEEM discussion paper.
Boyer, Robert and Drache, Daniel, eds. 1996. States Against Markets. The Limits of Globalization. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, John and Duguid, Paul. 1991. Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. Organization Science 2: 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brune, Nancy. 2006. Explaining Financial Liberalization Around the World. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Political Science, Yale University.
Brune, Nancy, Garrett, Geoff, and Kogut, Bruce. 2004. Privatizations by Shares in the World Economy: Credible Ideologies and International Financial Institutions. IMF Staff Papers 54: 195–219.Google Scholar
Burt, Ron. 1987. Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92: 1287–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttel, Frederick. 2000. World Society, the Nation-State and Environmental Protection: Comment on Frank, Hironaka and Schofer. American Sociological Review 65: 117–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John L. 2002. Ideas, Politics and Public Policy. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, M. A. 1994. Between Rocky Democracies and Hard Markets: Dilemmas of the Double Transition. Annual Review of Sociology 20: 125–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, David and Klamer, Arjo. 1987. The Making of an Economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S., Katz, Elihu, and Menzel, Herbert. 1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
Delano, Manuel and Traslavina, Hugo. 1989. La Herencia de los Chicago Boys. Santiago, Chile: Ornitorrinco.Google Scholar
de Vries, Margaret Garritsen. 1986. The International Monetary Fund: Economists in Key Roles. In Economists in International Agencies, edited by Coats, A. W.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars. Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin-American States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank. 1994. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, Rose, Andrew, and Wyplosz, Charles. 1996. Contagious Currency Crises: First Tests. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 98: 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C.World Trade Flows, 1980–1997 (CD-ROM). 2000. Davis, CA: Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California.Google Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion. Forthcoming. The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics. American Journal of Sociology.
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion and Babb, Sarah L.. 2002. The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries. American Journal of Sociology 108: 533–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, David, Hironaka, Ann and Schofer, Evan. 2000. The National State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review 65: 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, Francis. 1889. Comment on Edward B. Tylor's “On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions: Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18: 245–69.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judy and Robert Keohane. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework. In Ideas and Foreign Policy, edited by Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R., 3–30. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Guler, Isin, Guillen, Mauro, and Macpherson, Muir. 2002. Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of the ISO 9000 Quality Certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwartney, James, Lawson, Robert, and Block, Walter. 1996. Economic Freedom of the World: 1975–1995. Toronto: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Keynesianism Across Nations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Gary. 1998. Patterns of Asian Network Capitalism: The Cases of Taiwan and South Korea. In Networks, Markets, and the Pacific Rim: Studies in Strategy, edited by Fruin, Mark, 181–99. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harberger, Arnold. 1997. Good Economics Comes to Latin America, 1955–1995. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Henisz, Witold J., Zelner, Bennet A. and Guillen, Mauro F.. 2005. The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review 70 (6):871–97.CrossRef
Ikenberry, G. John. 1990. The International Spread of Privatization Policies: Inducements, Learning, and Policy Bandwagoning. In The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization, edited by Suleiman, Ezra N. and Waterbury, John, 88–109. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Jomo, K. S. and E. T. Gomez. 1997. Rents and Development in Multiethnic Malaysia. In The Role of Government in East Asian Economic Development, edited by Aoki, M., Kim, H.-K. and Okuno-Fujiwara, M., 342–72. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kapur, Devish, Lewis, John P., and Webb, Richard. 1997. The World Bank. Its First Half Century, Volume 1. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kobrin, Steven. 1985. Diffusion as an Explanation of Oil Expropriation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 29: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, Bruce and Muir Macpherson. 2002. The Decision to Privatize as an Economic Policy Idea: Trade Networks and Globalization. Paper presented at the Yale University conference on the Diffusion of Political and Economic Liberalism, organized by Geoffrey Garrett and Beth A. Simmons.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Tirole, Jean. 1991. Privatization and Incentives. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7: 84–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPorta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. 1998. Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean and Wenger, Etienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chang Kil and Strang, David. 2006. The International Diffusion of Public Sector Downsizing. International Organization 60 (4):883–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. 1997. Privatization in the United States. Rand Journal of Economics 28 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, Linda. 1998. Political Economy of a City-State: Government-Made Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald and Spinardi, Graham. 1995. Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons. American Journal of Sociology. 101: 44–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 1999. Privatization South American Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megginson, William and Netter, Jeffry. 2001. From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization. Journal of Economic Literature 39: 321–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John, Boli, John, Thomas, George, and Ramirez, Francisco. 1997. World Society and the Nation-state. American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, H. Laurence Jr. 1962. On the ‘Chicago School of Economics’. Journal of Political Economy 70 (1):64–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Michelle. 1999. The World Bank. New Agendas in a Changing World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirza, S. A. 1995. Privatization in Pakistan. Lahore: Ferozsons Ltd.Google Scholar
Nellis, John. 1999. Time to Rethink Privatization in Transition Economies? Discussion Paper No. 38, Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.
Pangestu, Mari. 1966. Economic Reform, Deregulation, and Privatization: The Indonesian Experience. Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Ramamurthi, Ravi. 1999. Why Haven't Developing Countries Privatised Deeper and Faster?World Development 27 (1):137–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sappington, David E. and Stiglitz, Joesph E.. 1987. Privatization, Information and Incentives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 6: 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamis, Hector. 2002. Re-forming the State. The Politics of Privatization in Latin America and Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: G. Allen & Unwin, Ltd.Google Scholar
Shirley, Mary and Walsh, Patrick. 2001. Public versus Private Ownership: The Current State of the Debate. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2420.Google Scholar
Shonfeld, Andrew. 1965. Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Patricio. 1991. Technocrats and Politics in Chile: From the Chicago Boys to the CIEPLAN Monks. Journal of Latin American Studies 23: 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth, Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey. Forthcoming. The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization.
Stigler, George and Friedland, Claire. 1975. The Citation Practices of Doctorates in Economics. Journal of Political Economy 83: 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, David. 1991. Adding Social Structure to Diffusion Models. Sociological Methods & Research 19: 324–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, David and Chang, Patricia M. Y.. 1993. The International Labour Organisation and the Welfare State: Institutional Effects on National Welfare Spending, 1960–80. International Organization 47: 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangri, Roger. 1999. The Politics of Patronage in Africa. Parastatals, Privatization, and Private Enterprise. Oxford: James Currey (Kampala: Fountain).Google Scholar
Thatcher, Margaret. 1993. The Downing Street Years. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Tuma, Nancy and Hannan, Michael. 1984. Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Valdes, Juan Gabriel. 1995. Pinochet's Economists: The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bulte, Christophe and Lilien, Gary L.. 2001. Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort. American Journal of Sociology 106: 1409–35.Google Scholar
Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G.. 1988. Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2002. The IMF and Economic Development, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, Jacoby. 2000. Imitation and Politics: Redesigning Modern Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1990. What Washington Means by Policy Reform. In Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? edited by Williamson, John, 5–20. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1995. Bureaucrats in Business: The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
World Bank. 2002. World Development Indicators (CD-ROM). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yergin, Daniel and Stanislaw, Joseph. 1998. The Commanding Heights: The Battle Between Government and the Market Place that is Remaking the Modern World. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Nick. 1997. Governing Ideas. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
24
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×