Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-prt4h Total loading time: 0.267 Render date: 2021-10-17T23:24:17.351Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

2 - The Surplus-Value Doctrine, Rodbertus's Charge of Plagiarism, and the Transformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Samuel Hollander
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter addresses Engels's claim in the Preface to Capital 2 (1885), in response to the charge of plagiarism by Karl Rodbertus, that the Marxian theory of surplus value based on labor power was already to be found in the Poverty of Philosophy (1847) and in “Wage Labour and Capital” (1849; see Prolegomena, p. 13). We encounter the complexity that in his Introduction to the 1891 edition of the latter document and in the correspondence of 1893, Engels seems to dilute this claim and postdate Marx's full comprehension of the surplus-value doctrine to about 1859. However, Engels's case actually turns out to be stronger than he realized: Not only does Marx spell out the essentials in 1849, bar the formal labor-power notion, but the Grundrisse (1857–8) – never seen by Engels – contains a most impressive formulation taking full account of labor power. If we then accept further Engels's affirmation that Marx was unfamiliar with Rodbertus until “around 1859,” the latter's charge collapses.

Even so, what precisely did Rodbertus have to say regarding the source of surplus value? I shall demonstrate that the formulation in Rodbertus from 1851 is almost identical with that of Marx, as Böhm-Bawerk and others – not only Rodbertus himself – insisted. Engels's approval of its “ironic dismissal” by Marx (MECW 36: 12) is an unjustified reaction. I also take account of Rodbertus's 1842 analysis.

I then review Engels's further efforts to undermine the significance of Rodbertus's contribution by focusing on its unoriginality; and his insistence, by way of contrast, on “labor power” as Marx's main innovation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×