Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:02:19.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 4 - Fertility Preservation Strategies in the Male

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2021

Jacques Donnez
Affiliation:
Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels
S. Samuel Kim
Affiliation:
University of Kansas School of Medicine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Preservation
Principles and Practice
, pp. 127 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ward, E, Desantis, C, Robbins, Aet al. Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014; 64(2): 83–103.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, SJ, Schover, LR, Partridge, AH et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol, 2006;24:29172931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, AC, Yasui, Y, Neglia, JP et al. Late mortality experience in five-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol, 2001;19:31633172.Google Scholar
Jeruss, JS, Woodruff, TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. NEJM, 2009;360:902911.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, JP, Li, Y, Carlson, CA et al. Testicular tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal male children: an analysis of parental decision-making. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2014;61:16731678.Google Scholar
Opsahl, MS, Fugger, EF, Sherins, RJ, Schulman, JD. Preservation of reproductive function before therapy for cancer: new options involving sperm and ovary cryopreservation. Cancer J Sci Am, 1997;3:189191.Google Scholar
Chen, SU, Ho, HN, Chen, HF et al. Pregnancy achieved by intracytoplasmic sperm injection using cryopreserved semen from a man with testicular cancer. Hum Reprod, 1996;11:26452647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliesch, S, Behre, HM, Jurgens, H, Nieschlag, E. Cryopreservation of semen from adolescent patients with malignancies. Med Pediatr Oncol, 1996;26:2027.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, WH, Anderson, RA, Irvine, DS. Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet Oncol, 2005;6:209218.Google Scholar
Damani, MN, Masters, V, Meng, MV et al. Postchemotherapy ejaculatory azoospermia: fatherhood with sperm from testis tissue with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Clin Oncol, 2002;20:930936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinster, RL. Germline stem cell transplantation and transgenesis. Science, 2002;296:21742176.Google Scholar
Culty, M. Gonocytes, the forgotten cells of the germ cell lineage. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today, 2009;87:126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paniagua, R, Nistal, M. Morphological and histometric study of human spermatogonia from birth to the onset of puberty. J Anat, 1984;139(Pt3):535552.Google Scholar
Brinster, RL. Male germline stem cells: From mice to men. Science, 2007;316:404405.Google Scholar
Brinster, RL, Zimmermann, JW. Spermatogenesis following male germ-cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1994;91:1129811302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyns, C, Curaba, M, Vanabelle, B, Van Langendonckt, A, Donnez, J. Options for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys. Hum Reprod Update, 2010;16:312328.Google Scholar
Avarbock, MR, Brinster, CJ, Brinster, RL. Reconstitution of spermatogenesis from frozen spermatogonial stem cells. Nat Med, 1996;2:693696.Google Scholar
Nagano, M, Patrizio, P, Brinster, RL. Long-term survival of human spermatogonial stem cells in mouse testes. Fertil Steril, 2002;78:12251233.Google Scholar
Bahadur, G, Chatterjee, R, Ralph, D. Testicular tissue cryopreservation in boys. Ethical and legal issues: Case report. Hum Reprod, 2000;15:14161420.Google Scholar
Ketola, I, Rahman, N, Toppari, J et al. Expression and regulation of transcription factors GATA-4 and GATA-6 in developing mouse testis. Endocrinology, 1999;140:14701480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagano, M, Avarbock, MR, Leonida, EB, Brinster, CJ, Brinster, RL. Culture of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Tissue Cell, 1998;30:389397.Google Scholar
Brinster, RL, Avarbock, MR. Germline transmission of donor haplotype following spermatogonial transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1994;91:1130311307.Google Scholar
Kubota, H, Brinster, RL. Spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod, 2018;99:5274.Google Scholar
Nieman, CL, Kazer, R, Brannigan, RE et al. Cancer survivors and infertility: a review of a new problem and novel answers. J Support Oncol, 2006;4:171178.Google Scholar
Tegelenbosch, RA, de Rooij, DG. A quantitative study of spermatogonial multiplication and stem cell renewal in the C3 H/101 F1 hybrid mouse. Mutat Res, 1993;290:193200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanatsu-Shinohara, M, Ogonuki, N, Inoue, K et al. Long-term proliferation in culture and germline transmission of mouse male germline stem cells. Biol Reprod, 2003;69:612616.Google Scholar
Kubota, H, Avarbock, MR, Brinster, RL. Growth factors essential for self-renewal and expansion of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004;101:1648916494.Google Scholar
Ryu, BY, Kubota, H, Avarbock, MR, Brinster, RL. Conservation of spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal signaling between mouse and rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005;102:1430214307.Google Scholar
Wu, X, Schmidt, JA, Avarbock, MR et al. Prepubertal human spermatogonia and mouse gonocytes share conserved gene expression of germline stem cell regulatory molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009;106:2167221677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, J, Megee, S, Rathi, R, Dobrinski, I. Protein gene product 9.5 is a spermatogonia-specific marker in the pig testis: application to enrichment and culture of porcine spermatogonia. Mol Reprod Dev, 2006;73:15311540.Google Scholar
Reijo, R, Seligman, J, Dinulos, MB et al. Mouse autosomal homolog of DAZ, a candidate male sterility gene in humans, is expressed in male germ cells before and after puberty. Genomics, 1996;35:346352.Google Scholar
Shinohara, T, Avarbock, MR, Brinster, RL. Beta1- and Alpha6-integrin are surface markers on mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1999;96:55045509.Google Scholar
Shinohara, T, Orwig, KE, Avarbock, MR, Brinster, RL. Spermatogonial stem cell enrichment by multiparameter selection of mouse testis cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000;97:83468351.Google Scholar
Oatley, JM, Avarbock, MR, Telaranta, AI, Fearon, DT, Brinster, RL. Identifying genes important for spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006;103:95249529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, JA, Avarbock, MR, Tobias, JW, Brinster, RL. Identification of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor-regulated genes important for spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal in the rat. Biol Reprod, 2009;81:5666.Google Scholar
Oatley, JM, Brinster, RL. Regulation of spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal in mammals. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2008;24:263286.Google Scholar
Hamra, FK, Schultz, N, Chapman, KM et al. Defining the spermatogonial stem cell. Dev Biol, 2004;269:393410.Google Scholar
Tyagi, G, Carnes, K, Morrow, C et al. Loss of Etv5 decreases proliferation and RET levels in neonatal mouse testicular germ cells and causes an abnormal first wave of spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod, 2009;81:258266.Google Scholar
Kubota, H, Wu, X, Goodyear, SM, Avarbock, MR, Brinster, RL. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and endothelial cells promote self-renewal of rabbit germ cells with spermatogonial stem cell properties. FASEB J, 2011;25:26042614.Google Scholar
Sadri-Ardekani, H, Mizrak, SC, van Daalen, SK et al. Propagation of human spermatogonial stem cells in vitro. JAMA, 2009;302:21272134.Google Scholar
Bhang, DH, Kim B-J, Kim BG, et al. Testicular endothelial cells are a critical population in germline stem cell niche. Nat Comm, 2018; 9:4379.Google Scholar
Keros, V, Hultenby, K, Borgstrom, B et al. Methods of cryopreservation of testicular tissue with viable spermatogonia in pre-pubertal boys undergoing gonadotoxic cancer treatment. Hum Reprod, 2007;22:13841395.Google Scholar
Hermann, BP, Sukhwani, M, Winkler, F et al. Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation into rhesus testes regenerates spermatogenesis producing functional sperm. Cell Stem Cell, 2012;11:715726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, X, Goodyear, SM, Abramowitz, LK et al. Fertile offspring derived from mouse spermatogonial stem cells cryopreserved for more than 14 years. Hum Reprod, 2012;27:12491259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, YA, Kim, YH, Ha, SJ et al. Effect of sugar molecules on the cryopreservation of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Fertil Steril, 2014;101:1165–1175 e1165.Google Scholar
Lee, YA, Kim, YH, Kim, BJ et al. Cryopreservation in trehalose preserves functional capacity of murine spermatogonial stem cells. PloS One, 2013;8:e54889.Google Scholar
Ha, SJ, Kim, BG, Lee, YA et al. Effect of antioxidants and apoptosis inhibitors on cryopreservation of murine germ cells enriched for spermatogonial stem cells. PloS One, 2016;11:e0161372.Google Scholar
Grundy, R, Gosden, RG, Hewitt, M et al. Fertility preservation for children treated for cancer (1): Scientific advances and research dilemmas. Arch Dis Child, 2001;84:355359.Google Scholar
Grundy, R, Larcher, V, Gosden, RG et al. Fertility preservation for children treated for cancer (2): ethics of consent for gamete storage and experimentation. Arch Dis Child, 2001;84:360362.Google Scholar
Willemse, MJ, Seriu, T, Hettinger, K et al. Detection of minimal residual disease identifies differences in treatment response between T-ALL and precursor B-ALL. Blood, 2002;99:43864393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geens, M, Van de Velde, H, De Block, G et al. The efficiency of magnetic-activated cell sorting and fluorescence-activated cell sorting in the decontamination of testicular cell suspensions in cancer patients. Hum Reprod, 2007;22:733742.Google Scholar
Jolkowska, J, Derwich, K, Dawidowska, M. Methods of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in childhood haematological malignancies. J Appl Genet, 2007;48:7783.Google Scholar
Fujita, K, Ohta, H, Tsujimura, A et al. Transplantation of spermatogonial stem cells isolated from leukemic mice restores fertility without inducing leukemia. J Clin Invest, 2005;115:18551861.Google Scholar
Jahnukainen, K, Hou, M, Petersen, C, Setchell, B, Soder, O. Intratesticular transplantation of testicular cells from leukemic rats causes transmission of leukemia. Cancer Res, 2001;61:706710.Google Scholar
Sadri-Ardekani, H, Homburg, CH, van Capel, TM et al. Eliminating acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells from human testicular cell cultures: a pilot study. Fertil Steril, 2014;101:1072–1078 e1071.Google Scholar
Hovatta, O. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue in young cancer patients. Hum Reprod Update, 2001;7:378383.Google Scholar
Cohen, CB. Ethical issues regarding fertility preservation in adolescents and children. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2009;53:249253.Google Scholar
Sugarman, J, Rosoff, PM. Ethical issues in gamete preservation for children undergoing treatment for cancer. J Androl, 2001;22:732737.Google Scholar
Wyns, C, Collienne, C, Shenfield, F et al. Fertility preservation in the male pediatric population: factors influencing the decision of parents and children. Hum Reprod, 2015;30:20222030.Google Scholar
Fallat, ME, Hutter, J. Preservation of fertility in pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer. Pediatrics, 2008;121:e1461-1469.Google Scholar
de Rooij, DG. Stem cells in the testis. Int J Exp Pathol, 1998;79:6780.Google Scholar

References

Robison, LL, Hudson, MM. Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: life-long risks and responsibilities. Nat Rev Cancer, 2014;14:6170.Google Scholar
Picton, HM, Wyns, C, Anderson, RA et al. A European perspective on testicular tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in prepubertal and adolescent boys. Hum Reprod, 2015;30:24632475.Google Scholar
Vento, F Del, Vermeulen, M, Michele, F de et al. Tissue engineering to improve immature testicular tissue and cell transplantation outcomes: one step closer to fertility restoration for prepubertal boys exposed to gonadotoxic treatments. Int J Mol Sci, 2018;19:286.Google Scholar
Jahnukainen, K, Ehmcke, J, Hou, M, Schlatt, S. Testicular function and fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2011;25:287302.Google Scholar
Alphen, MMA van, Kant HJG, van de, Rooij, DG de. Repopulation of the seminiferous epithelium of the rhesus monkey after X irradiation. Radiat Res, 1988;113:487500.Google Scholar
Stukenborg, J-B, Jahnukainen, K, Hutka, M, Mitchell, RT. Cancer treatment in childhood and testicular function: the role of the somatic environment. Endocr Connect, 2018;EC-17–0382.Google Scholar
Skinner, R, Mulder, RL, Kremer, LC et al. Recommendations for gonadotoxicity surveillance in male childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group in collaboration with the PanCareSurFup Consort. Lancet Oncol, 2017;18:e75e90.Google Scholar
Heckmann, L, Langenstroth-Röwer, D, Pock, T et al. A diagnostic germ cell score for immature testicular tissue at risk of germ cell loss. Hum Reprod, 2018;33:636645.Google Scholar
Anderson, RA, Mitchell, RT, Kelsey, TW et al. Cancer treatment and gonadal function: experimental and established strategies for fertility preservation in children and young adults. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2015;3:556567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, WHB, Anderson, RA, Irvine, DS. Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet Oncol, 2005;6:209218.Google Scholar
Keros, V, Hultenby, K, Borgström, B et al. Methods of cryopreservation of testicular tissue with viable spermatogonia in pre-pubertal boys undergoing gonadotoxic cancer treatment. Hum Reprod, 2007;22:13841395.Google Scholar
Stukenborg, J-B, Alves-Lopes, JP, Kurek, M et al. Spermatogonial quantity in human prepubertal testicular tissue collected for fertility preservation prior to potentially sterilizing therapy. Hum Reprod, 2018;33(9):1677–1683.Google Scholar
Wyns, C, Langendonckt, A Van, Wese, FX, Donnez, J, Curaba, M. Long-term spermatogonial survival in cryopreserved and xenografted immature human testicular tissue. Hum Reprod, 2008;23:24022414.Google Scholar
Baert, Y, Saen, D Van, Haentjens, P et al. What is the best cryopreservation protocol for human testicular tissue banking? Hum Reprod, 2013;28:18161826.Google Scholar
Wyns, C, Curaba, M, Martinez-Madrid, B et al. Spermatogonial survival after cryopreservation and short-term orthotopic immature human cryptorchid testicular tissue grafting to immunodeficient mice. Hum Reprod, 2007;22:16031611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyns, C, Curaba, M, Petit, S et al. Management of fertility preservation in prepubertal patients: 5 years’ experience at the Catholic University of Louvain. Hum Reprod, 2011;26:737747.Google Scholar
Saen, D Van, Vloeberghs, V, Gies, I et al. When does germ cell loss and fibrosis occur in patients with Klinefelter syndrome? Hum Reprod, 2018;33:10091022.Google Scholar
Jahnukainen, K, Mitchell, RT, Stukenborg, JB. Testicular function and fertility preservation after treatment for haematological cancer. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes, 2015;22:217223.Google Scholar
Masliukaite, I, Hagen, JM, Jahnukainen, K et al. Establishing reference values for age-related spermatogonial quantity in prepubertal human testes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril, 2016;106:16521657.e2.Google Scholar
Poganitsch-Korhonen, M, Masliukaite, I, Nurmio, M et al. Decreased spermatogonial quantity in prepubertal boys with leukaemia treated with alkylating agents. Leukemia, 2017;31:14601463.Google Scholar
Tröndle, I, Westernströer, B, Wistuba, J et al. Irradiation affects germ and somatic cells in prepubertal monkey testis xenografts. Mol Hum Reprod, 2017;23:gax003.Google Scholar
Smart, E, Lopes, F, Rice, S et al. Chemotherapy drugs cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and doxorubicin induce germ cell loss in an in vitro model of the prepubertal testis. Sci Rep, 2018;8:1773.Google Scholar
Franik, S, Hoeijmakers, Y, D’Hauwers, K et al. Klinefelter syndrome and fertility: sperm preservation should not be offered to children with Klinefelter syndrome. Hum Reprod, 2016;31:19521959.Google Scholar
Onofre, J, Baert, Y, Faes, K, Goossens, E. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue or testicular cell suspensions: a pivotal step in fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Update, 2016;22:744761.Google Scholar
Uijldert, M, Meißner, A, Melker, AA de et al. Development of the testis in pre-pubertal boys with cancer after biopsy for fertility preservation. Hum Reprod, 2017;32:23662372.Google Scholar
Keros, V, Rosenlund, B, Hultenby, K et al. Optimizing cryopreservation of human testicular tissue: Comparison of protocols with glycerol, propanediol and dimethylsulphoxide as cryoprotectants. Hum Reprod, 2005;20:16761687.Google Scholar
Baert, Y, Braye, A, Struijk, RB, Pelt, AMM van,Goossens, E. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue before long-term testicular cell culture does not alter in vitro cell dynamics. Fertil Steril, 2015;104:12441252.e4.Google Scholar
Kvist, K, Thorup, J, Byskov, AG et al. Cryopreservation of intact testicular tissue from boys with cryptorchidism. Hum Reprod, 2006;21:484491.Google Scholar
Martinez, F. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation–ESHRE–ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives. Hum Reprod, 2017;32:18021811.Google Scholar
Oktay, K, Harvey, BE, Partridge, AH et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol, 2018;JCO.2018.78.191.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fertility problems: assessment and treatment. 2013; Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156/chapter/Recommendations#people-with-cancer-who-wish-to-preserve-fertilityGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z, Nie, YH, Zhang, CC et al. Generation of macaques with sperm derived from juvenile monkey testicular xenografts. Cell Res, 2016;26:139142.Google Scholar
Honaramooz, A, Snedaker, A, Boiani, M et al. Sperm from neonatal mammalian testes grafted in mice. Nature, 2002;418:778781.Google Scholar
Rathi, R, Zeng, W, Megee, S et al. Maturation of testicular tissue from infant monkeys after xenografting into mice. Endocrinology, 2008;149:52885296.Google Scholar
Honaramooz, A, Li, M-W, Penedo, MCT, Meyers, S, Dobrinski, I. Accelerated maturation of primate testis by xenografting into mice. Biol Reprod, 2004;70:15001503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jahnukainen, K, Ehmcke, J, Nurmio, M, Schlatt, S. Autologous ectopic grafting of cryopreserved testicular tissue preserves the fertility of prepubescent monkeys that receive sterilizing cytotoxic therapy. Cancer Res, 2012;72:51745178.Google Scholar
Wistuba, J, Luetjens, CM, Wesselmann, R et al. Meiosis in autologous ectopic transplants of immature testicular tissue grafted to callithrix jacchus. Biol Reprod, 2006;74:706713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, Y, Taniguchi, M. Studying spermatogenesis by using In vivo and In vitro models: advantages and disadvantages of these models for practical use. J Vet Sci Technol, 2012;03:18.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, M, Poels, J, Michele, F de, Rieux, A des, Wyns, C. Restoring fertility with cryopreserved prepubertal testicular tissue: perspectives with hydrogel encapsulation, nanotechnology, and bioengineered scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng, 2017;45:17701781.Google Scholar
Luetjens, MC, Stukenborg, J-B, Nieschlag, E, Simoni, M, Wistuba, J. Complete spermatogenesis in orthotopic but not in ectopic transplants of autologously grafted marmoset testicular tissue. Endocrinology, 2008;149:17361747.Google Scholar
Saen, D Van, Goossens, E, Block, G De, Tournaye, H. Regeneration of spermatogenesis by grafting testicular tissue or injecting testicular cells into the testes of sterile mice: a comparative study.Fertil Steril, 2009;91:22642272.Google Scholar
Schlatt, S, Honaramooz, A, Ehmcke, J et al. Limited survival of adult human testicular tissue as ectopic xenograft. Hum Reprod, 2006;21:384389.Google Scholar
Goossens, E, Geens, M, Block, G De, Tournaye, H. Spermatogonial survival in long-term human prepubertal xenografts. Fertil Steril, 2008;90:20192022.Google Scholar
Yu, J, Cai, Z-M, Wan, H-J et al. Development of neonatal mouse and fetal human testicular tissue as ectopic grafts in immunodeficient mice. Asian J Androl, 2006;8:393403.Google Scholar
Mitchell, RT, Saunders, PTK, Childs, AJ et al. Xenografting of human fetal testis tissue: a new approach to study fetal testis development and germ cell differentiation. Hum Reprod, 2010;25:24052414.Google Scholar
Lo, KC, Yildiz, C, Zhu, Y et al. Human fetal testicular tissue xenotransplantation: a platform to study the effect of gonadotropins on human germ cell development in utero.J Urol, 2015;194:585591.Google Scholar
Saen, D Van, Goossens, E, Haentjens, P, Baert, Y, Tournaye, H. Exogenous administration of recombinant human FSH does not improve germ cell survival in human prepubertal xenografts. Reprod Biomed Online, 2013;26:286298.Google Scholar
Poels, J, Langendonckt, A Van, Many, MC, Wese, FX, Wyns, C. Vitrification preserves proliferation capacity in human spermatogonia. Hum Reprod, 2013;28:578589.Google Scholar
Saen, D Van, Goossens, E, Bourgain, C, Ferster, A, Tournaye, H. Meiotic activity in orthotopic xenografts derived from human postpubertal testicular tissue. Hum Reprod, 2011;26:282293.Google Scholar
Poels, J, Abou-Ghannam, G, Herman, S et al. In search of better spermatogonial preservation by supplementation of cryopreserved human immature testicular tissue xenografts with N-acetylcysteine and testosterone. Front Surg, 2014;1:19.Google Scholar
Yokonishi, T, Sato, T, Katagiri, K et al. In vitro reconstruction of mouse seminiferous tubules supporting germ cell differentiation. Biol Reprod, 2013;89:16.Google Scholar
Mincheva, M, Sandhowe-Klaverkamp, R, Wistuba, J et al. Reassembly of adult human testicular cells: can testis cord-like structures be created in vitro? Mol Hum Reprod, 2018;24:5563.Google Scholar
Gassei, K, Ehmcke, J, Wood, MA, Walker, WH, Schlatt, S. Immature rat seminiferous tubules reconstructed in vitro express markers of Sertoli cell maturation after xenografting into nude mouse hosts. Mol Hum Reprod, 2010;16:97110.Google Scholar
Kita, K, Watanabe, T, Ohsaka, K et al. Production of functional spermatids from mouse germline stem cells in ectopically reconstituted seminiferous tubules. Biol Reprod, 2007;76:211217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Q, Wang, M, Yuan, Y et al. Complete meiosis from embryonic stem cell-derived germ cells in vitro. Cell Stem Cell, 2016;18:330340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishikura, Y, Yabuta, Y, Ohta, H et al. In vitro derivation and propagation of spermatogonial stem cell activity from mouse pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep, 2016;17:27892804.Google Scholar
Irie, N, Weinberger, L, Tang, WWC et al. SOX17 is a critical specifier of human primordial germ cell fate. Cell, 2015;160:253268.Google Scholar
Park, TS, Galic, Z, Conway, AE et al. Derivation of primordial germ cells from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells is significantly improved by coculture with human fetal gonadal cells.Stem Cells, 2009;27:783795.Google Scholar
Vassena, R, Heindryckx, B, Peco, R et al. Genome engineering through CRISPR/Cas9 technology in the human germline and pluripotent stem cells. Hum Reprod Update, 2016;22:411419.Google Scholar
Hutka M, Smith LB, Goossens E et al. Exogenous gonadotrophin stimulation induces partial maturation of human sertoli cells in a testicular xenotransplantation model for fertility preservation. J Clin Med, 2020;9:266.Google Scholar
Ntemou E, Kadam P, Van Saen D et al. Complete spermatogenesis in intratesticular testis tissue xenotransplants from immature non-human primate. Hum Reprod, 2019;34:403–413.Google Scholar
Goossens E, Jahnukainen K, Mitchell RT et al. Fertility preservation in boys: recent developments and new insights. Hum Reprod Open, 2020;3:hoaa016.Google Scholar
Braye A, Tournaye H, Goossens E. Setting up a cryopreservation programme for immature testicular tissue: lessons learned after more than 15 years of experience. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health, 2019;13:1179558119886342.Google Scholar
Fayomi AP, Peters K, Sukhwani M et al. Autologous grafting of cryopreserved prepubertal rhesus testis produces sperm and offspring. Science, 2019;363:1314–1319.Google Scholar
Mincheva M, Wistuba J, Brenker C et al. Challenging human somatic testicular cell reassembly by protein kinase inhibition-setting up a functional in vitro test system. Sci Rep, 2020;10:8935.Google Scholar

References

Landis, NT. Pharmacy technician helps cancer patients look good. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 1999;56(3):208.Google Scholar
Sant, M, Aareleid, T, Berrino, F et al. EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990–94–results and commentary. Ann Oncol, 2003;14(Suppl5):v61118.Google Scholar
Garcia, JM, Li, H, Mann, D et al. Hypogonadism in male patients with cancer. Cancer, 2006;106(12):25832591.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, A, Vassilopoulou-Sellin, R, Palmer, JL, Kaur, G, Bruera, E. Symptomatic hypogonadism in male survivors of cancer with chronic exposure to opioids. Cancer, 2004;100(4):851858.Google Scholar
Tisdale, MJ. Cachexia in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer, 2002;2(11):862871.Google Scholar
Pfitzenmaier, J, Vessella, R, Higano, CS et al. Elevation of cytokine levels in cachectic patients with prostate carcinoma. Cancer, 2003;97(5):12111216.Google Scholar
Watson, ME, Newman, RJ, Payne, AM, Abdelrahim, M, Francis, GL. The effect of macrophage conditioned media on Leydig cell function. Ann Clin Lab Sci, 1994;24(1):8495.Google Scholar
Turnbull, AV, Rivier, C. Inhibition of gonadotropin-induced testosterone secretion by the intracerebroventricular injection of interleukin-1 beta in the male rat. Endocrinology, 1997;138(3):10081013.Google Scholar
Afane, M, Dubost, JJ, Sauvezie, B et al. Modulation of Leydig cell testosterone production by secretory products of macrophages. Andrologia, 1998;30(2):7178.Google Scholar
Kluge, M, Schussler, P, Uhr, M, Yassouridis, A, Steiger, A. Ghrelin suppresses secretion of luteinizing hormone in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007;92(8):32023205.Google Scholar
Lanfranco, F, Bonelli, L, Baldi, M et al. Acylated ghrelin inhibits spontaneous luteinizing hormone pulsatility and responsiveness to naloxone but not that to gonadotropin-releasing hormone in young men: evidence for a central inhibitory action of ghrelin on the gonadal axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2008;93(9):36333639.Google Scholar
Burney, BO, Garcia, JM. Hypogonadism in male cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle, 2012;3(3):149155.Google Scholar
Fraser, LA, Morrison, D, Morley-Forster, P et al. Oral opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: higher prevalence of hypogonadism in men than in women. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 2009;117(1):3843.Google Scholar
Mendelson, JH, Ellingboe, J, Judson, BA, Goldstein, A. Plasma testosterone and luteinizing hormone levels during levo-alpha-acetylmethadol maintenance and withdrawal. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1984;35(4):545547.Google Scholar
Howell, SJ, Radford, JA, Ryder, WD, Shalet, SM. Testicular function after cytotoxic chemotherapy: evidence of Leydig cell insufficiency. J Clin Oncol, 1999;17(5):14931498.Google Scholar
Stuart, NS, Woodroffe, CM, Grundy, R, Cullen, MH. Long-term toxicity of chemotherapy for testicular cancer–the cost of cure. Br J Cancer, 1990;61(3):479484.Google Scholar
Dueland, S, Guren, MG, Olsen, DR, Poulsen, JP, Magne Tveit, K. Radiation therapy induced changes in male sex hormone levels in rectal cancer patients. Radiother Oncol, 2003;68(3):249253.Google Scholar
Oakberg, EF. Sensitivity and time of degeneration of spermatogenic cells irradiated in various stages of maturation in the mouse. Radiat Res, 1955;2(4):369391.Google Scholar
Meistrich, ML, Finch, M, da Cunha, MF, Hacker, U, Au, WW. Damaging effects of fourteen chemotherapeutic drugs on mouse testis cells. Cancer Res, 1982;42(1):122131.Google Scholar
Wallace, WH, Anderson, RA, Irvine, DS. Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet Oncol, 2005;6(4):209218.Google Scholar
Meistrich, ML. Effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on spermatogenesis in humans. Fertil Steril, 2013;100(5):11801186.Google Scholar
Mariani, S, Basciani, S, Fabbri, A et al. Severe oligozoospermia in a young man with chronic myeloid leukemia on long-term treatment with imatinib started before puberty. Fertil Steril, 2011;95(3):1120e11151127.Google Scholar
Seshadri, T, Seymour, JF, McArthur, GA. Oligospermia in a patient receiving imatinib therapy for the hypereosinophilic syndrome. N Engl J Med, 2004;351(20):21342135.Google Scholar
Borgmann-Staudt, A, Rendtorff, R, Reinmuth, S et al. Fertility after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in childhood and adolescence. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2012;47(2):271276.Google Scholar
Meistrich, ML, Wilson, G, Mathur, K et al. Rapid recovery of spermatogenesis after mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, and prednisone chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol, 1997;15(12):34883495.Google Scholar
Lass, A, Akagbosu, F, Abusheikha, N et al. A programme of semen cryopreservation for patients with malignant disease in a tertiary infertility centre: lessons from 8 years’ experience. Hum Reprod, 1998;13(11):32563261.Google Scholar
Ragni, G, Somigliana, E, Restelli, L et al.Sperm banking and rate of assisted reproduction treatment: insights from a 15-year cryopreservation program for male cancer patients. Cancer, 2003;97(7):16241629.Google Scholar
Oktay, K, Harvey, BE, Partridge, AH et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol, 2018;36(19):19942001.Google Scholar
Zebrack, BJ, Casillas, J, Nohr, L, Adams, H, Zeltzer, LK. Fertility issues for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Psychooncology, 2004;13(10):689699.Google Scholar
Schover, LR, Brey, K, Lichtin, A, Lipshultz, LI, Jeha, S. Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol, 2002;20(7):18801889.Google Scholar
Schover, LR, Rybicki, LA, Martin, BA, Bringelsen, KA. Having children after cancer. A pilot survey of survivors’ attitudes and experiences. Cancer, 1999;86(4):697709.Google Scholar
Schover, LR, Brey, K, Lichtin, A, Lipshultz, LI, Jeha, S. Oncologists’ attitudes and practices regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol, 2002;20(7):18901897.Google Scholar
Glaser, AW, Phelan, L, Crawshaw, M, Jagdev, S, Hale, J. Fertility preservation in adolescent males with cancer in the United Kingdom: a survey of practice. Arch Dis Child, 2004;89(8):736737.Google Scholar
Heath, JA, Stern, CJ. Fertility preservation in children newly diagnosed with cancer: existing standards of practice in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust, 2006;185(10):538541.Google Scholar
Kelleher, S, Wishart, SM, Liu, PY et al. Long-term outcomes of elective human sperm cryostorage. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(12):26322639.Google Scholar
Blackhall, FH, Atkinson, AD, Maaya, MB et al. Semen cryopreservation, utilisation and reproductive outcome in men treated for Hodgkin’s disease. Br J Cancer, 2002;87(4):381384.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Ranganathan, P, Kattal, N et al. Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens. Fertil Steril, 2004;81(2):342348.Google Scholar
Forbes, CM, Flannigan, R, Schlegel, PN. Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation and male infertility: Current status and future directions. Arab J Urol, 2018;16(1):171180.Google Scholar
Sandeman, TF. The effects of x irradiation on male human fertility. Br J Radiol, 1966;39(468):901907.Google Scholar
Castillo, LA, Craft, AW, Kernahan, J, Evans, RG, Aynsley-Green, A. Gonadal function after 12-Gy testicular irradiation in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Med Pediatr Oncol, 1990;18(3):185189.Google Scholar
Shalet, SM, Tsatsoulis, A, Whitehead, E, Read, G. Vulnerability of the human Leydig cell to radiation damage is dependent upon age. J Endocrinol, 1989;120(1):161165.Google Scholar
Marmor, D, Grob-Menendez, F, Duyck, F, Delafontaine, D. Very late return of spermatogenesis after chlorambucil therapy: case reports. Fertil Steril, 1992;58(4):845846.Google Scholar
Schmidt, KL, Larsen, E, Bangsboll, S et al. Assisted reproduction in male cancer survivors: fertility treatment and outcome in 67 couples. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(12):28062810.Google Scholar
Kader, HA, Rostom, AY. Follicle stimulating hormone levels as a predictor of recovery of spermatogenesis following cancer therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 1991;3(1):3740.Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R, Lin, K, Gosden, LV et al. High serum FSH levels in men with nonobstructive azoospermia does not affect success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril, 2009;92(2):590593.Google Scholar
Alfano, M, Ventimiglia, E, Locatelli, I et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone-to-testosterone ratio is predictive of positive sperm retrieval in men with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia. Sci Rep, 2017;7(1):17638.Google Scholar
Zhang, S, Du, J, Tian, R et al. Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia. BMC Urol, 2018;18(1):48.Google Scholar
Kop, PA, van Wely, M, Mol, BW et al. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study. Hum Reprod, 2015;30(3):603607.Google Scholar
Hourvitz, A, Goldschlag, DE, Davis, OK et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using cryopreserved sperm from men with malignant neoplasm yields high pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril, 2008;90(3):557563.Google Scholar
Dohle, GR. Male infertility in cancer patients: Review of the literature. Int J Urol, 2010;17(4):327331.Google Scholar
Botchan, A, Karpol, S, Lehavi, O et al. Preservation of sperm of cancer patients: extent of use and pregnancy outcome in a tertiary infertility center. Asian J Androl, 2013;15(3):382386.Google Scholar
Spermon, JR, Ramos, L, Wetzels, AM et al. Sperm integrity pre- and post-chemotherapy in men with testicular germ cell cancer. Hum Reprod, 2006;21(7):17811786.Google Scholar
Berthelsen, JG, Skakkebaek, NE. Gonadal function in men with testis cancer. Fertil Steril, 1983;39(1):6875.Google Scholar
Sanger, WG, Armitage, JO, Schmidt, MA. Feasibility of semen cryopreservation in patients with malignant disease. JAMA, 1980;244(8):789790.Google Scholar
Viviani, S, Ragni, G, Santoro, A et al. Testicular dysfunction in Hodgkin’s disease before and after treatment. Eur J Cancer, 1991;27(11):13891392.Google Scholar
Khalifa, E, Oehninger, S, Acosta, AA et al. Successful fertilization and pregnancy outcome in in-vitro fertilization using cryopreserved/thawed spermatozoa from patients with malignant diseases. Hum Reprod, 1992;7(1):105108.Google Scholar
Padron, OF, Sharma, RK, Thomas, A, Jr., Agarwal, A. Effects of cancer on spermatozoa quality after cryopreservation: a 12-year experience. Fertil Steril, 1997;67(2):326331.Google Scholar
Schrader, M, Muller, M, Sofikitis, N et al. “Onco-tese”: testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic cancer patients before chemotherapy-new guidelines? Urology, 2003;61(2):421425.Google Scholar
Abumelha, S, Poullis, C, Almashat, F et al. Microdissection onco-TESE in men with azoospermia and cancer. European Urology, 2016;Supplement 15(3):e185.Google Scholar
Baniel, J, Sella, A. Sperm extraction at orchiectomy for testis cancer. Fertil Steril, 2001;75(2):260262.Google Scholar
Carmignani, L, Gadda, F, Gazzano, G et al. Testicular sperm extraction in cancerous testicle in patients with azoospermia: a case report. Hum Reprod, 2007;22(4):10681072.Google Scholar
Descombe, L, Chauleur, C, Gentil-Perret, A et al. Testicular sperm extraction in a single cancerous testicle in patients with azoospermia: a case report. Fertil Steril, 2008;90(2):443e441444.Google Scholar
Kohn, FM, Schroeder-Printzen, I, Weidner, W et al. Testicular sperm extraction in a patient with metachronous bilateral testicular cancer. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(11):23432346.Google Scholar
De Mas, P, Daudin, M, Vincent, MC et al. Increased aneuploidy in spermatozoa from testicular tumour patients after chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(6):12041208.Google Scholar
Rives, N, Walschaerts, M, Setif, V et al. Sperm aneuploidy after testicular cancer treatment: data from a prospective multicenter study performed within the French Centre d’Etude et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme network. Fertil Steril, 2017;107(3):580–588 e581.Google Scholar
Smit, M, van Casteren, NJ, Wildhagen, MF, Romijn, JC, Dohle, GR. Sperm DNA integrity in cancer patients before and after cytotoxic treatment. Hum Reprod, 2010;25(8):18771883.Google Scholar
Brydoy, M, Fossa, SD, Klepp, O et al. Paternity following treatment for testicular cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005;97(21):15801588.Google Scholar
Ohl, DA, Denil, J, Bennett, CJ et al. Electroejaculation following retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. J Urol, 1991;145(5):980983.Google Scholar
Hultling, C, Rosenlund, B, Tornblom, M et al. Transrectal electroejaculation in combination with in-vitro fertilization: an effective treatment of anejaculatory infertility after testicular cancer. Hum Reprod, 1995;10(4):847850.Google Scholar
Chung, PH, Palermo, G, Schlegel, PN et al. The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with electroejaculates from anejaculatory men. Hum Reprod, 1998;13(7):18541858.Google Scholar
Rosenlund, B, Sjoblom, P, Tornblom, M, Hultling, C, Hillensjo, T. In-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of infertility after testicular cancer. Hum Reprod, 1998;13(2):414418.Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod, 1999;14(1):131135.Google Scholar
Schoor, RA, Elhanbly, S, Niederberger, CS, Ross, LS. The role of testicular biopsy in the modern management of male infertility. J Urol, 2002;167(1):197200.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, A, Matsumiya, K, Miyagawa, Y et al. Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod, 2002;17(11):29242929.Google Scholar
Su, LM, Palermo, GD, Goldstein, M et al. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia: testicular histology can predict success of sperm retrieval. J Urol, 1999;161(1):112116.Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R, Schlegel, PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: effect of prior biopsy on success of sperm retrieval. J Urol, 2007;177(4):14471449.Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R, Yagan, N, Schlegel, PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology, 2005;65(6):11901194.Google Scholar
Hsiao, W, Stahl, PJ, Osterberg, EC et al. Successful treatment of postchemotherapy azoospermia with microsurgical testicular sperm extraction: the Weill Cornell experience. J Clin Oncol, 2011;29(12):16071611.Google Scholar
Damani, MN, Master, V, Meng, MV et al. Postchemotherapy ejaculatory azoospermia: fatherhood with sperm from testis tissue with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Clin Oncol, 2002;20(4):930936.Google Scholar
Meseguer, M, Garrido, N, Remohi, J et al. Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and ICSI in patients with permanent azoospermia after chemotherapy. Hum Reprod, 2003;18(6):12811285.Google Scholar
Daniels, K. Donor Insemination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2013;100(1):4549.Google Scholar
Ethics ETFo. Law. III. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod, 2002;17(5):14071408.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, Appleton, TC, Baetens, P et al. Guidelines for counselling in infertility: outline version. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(6):13011304.Google Scholar
Covington, SN. The role of the mental health professional in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril, 1995;64(5):895897.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, DA. Does psychological support and counseling reduce the stress experienced by couples involved in assisted reproductive technology? J Assist Reprod Genet, 1997;14(4):186188.Google Scholar
Applegarth, L. The psychological aspects of infertility. In Keye, W, Chang, R, Rebar, R, Soules, M (eds.) Infertility: Evaluation and Treatment. Vol 25–41. Philadelphia: Saunders. 1995.Google Scholar
Leiblum, S, Greenfeld, D. The course of infertility: immediate and long-term reactions. In Leiblum, S (ed.) Infertility: Psychological Issues and Counseling Strategies. New York: Wiley. 1997, 8392.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, D. Recipient counseling for oocyte donation. In Burns, L, Covington, S (eds.) Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. New York: Parthenon Publishing Group. 1999, 435455.Google Scholar
Frith, L. Beneath the rhetoric: the role of rights in the practice of non-anonymous gamete donation. Bioethics, 2001;15(5–6):473484.Google Scholar
Mahlstedt, PP, Greenfeld, DA. Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes: the need for patient preparation. Fertil Steril, 1989;52(6):908914.Google Scholar
Gong, D, Liu, YL, Zheng, Z, Tian, YF, Li, Z. An overview on ethical issues about sperm donation. Asian J Androl, 2009;11(6):645652.Google Scholar
Thorn, P. Recipient counseling for donor insemination. In Covington, S, Burns, L (eds.) Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2006.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Using family members as gamete donors or surrogates. Fertil Steril, 2012;98(4):797803.Google Scholar
Applegarth, L, Grill, E. Psychological issues in reproductive disorders. In Chan, P, Goldstein, M, Rosenwaks, Z (eds.) Reproductive Medicine Secrets. Philadelphia PA: Hanley and Belfus Medical Publishers. 2004, 342362.Google Scholar
Cooper, S, Glazer, E. Choosing Assisted Reproduction. Indianapolis: Perspectives Press. 1998.Google Scholar
Daniels, KR, Thorn, P. Sharing information with donor insemination offspring. A child-conception versus a family-building approach. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(9):17921796.Google Scholar
McGee, G, Brakman, SV, Gurmankin, AD. Gamete donation and anonymity: disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional. Hum Reprod, 2001;16(10):20332036.Google Scholar
McWhinnie, A. Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Hum Reprod, 2001;16(5):807817.Google Scholar
Broderick, P, Walker, I. Information access and donated gametes: how much do we know about who wants to know? Hum Reprod, 1995;10(12):33383341.Google Scholar
Klock, SC. The controversy surrounding privacy or disclosure among donor gamete recipients. J Assist Reprod Genet, 1997;14(7):378380.Google Scholar
Shenfield, F, Steele, SJ. What are the effects of anonymity and secrecy on the welfare of the child in gamete donation? Hum Reprod, 1997;12(2):392395.Google Scholar
Haimes, E. Theory and methodology in the analysis of the policy process: a case study of the Warnock committee on human fertilization and embryology. In Hill, M (ed.) New Agendas in the Study of the Policy Process. Hemel Hempstead: Wheatsheaf. 1993, 152175.Google Scholar
Pennings, G. The “double track” policy for donor anonymity. Hum Reprod, 1997;12(12):28392844.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, DA. The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspring. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2008;20(3):265268.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, WB, Lichtenberg, JW. Child abuse and the limits of confidentiality: forewarning practices. Behav Sci Law, 1993;11(2):181192.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Psychological assessment of gamete donors and recipients. Fertil Steril, 2004;82(Suppl 1):S18S19.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, K, Carmichael, M, Tinney, L, Mulder, A. Gamete donors’ and recipients’ evaluation of donor counselling: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008;48(6):601606.Google Scholar
Boggio, A. Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod, 2005;20(5):11531157.Google Scholar
Boggio, A. The legalisation of gamete donation in Italy. Eur J Health Law, 2017;24(1):85104.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, C, Lalos, O, Lindblad, F. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples’ attitudes. Hum Reprod, 2000;15(9):20522056.Google Scholar
Cook, R, Golombok, S, Bish, A, Murray, C. Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 1995;65(4):549559.Google Scholar
Lindblad, F, Gottlieb, C, Lalos, O. To tell or not to tell–what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2000;21(4):193203.Google Scholar
Nachtigall, RD, Becker, G, Wozny, M. The effects of gender-specific diagnosis on men’s and women’s response to infertility. Fertil Steril, 1992;57(1):113121.Google Scholar
Molock, S. Racial cultural and religious issues in infertility counseling. In Burns, L, Covinton, S (eds.) Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. Pearl River, NY: Parthenon Publishing Group. 1999, 249265.Google Scholar
McCormick, RA. Surrogacy: a catholic perspective. Creighton Law Rev, 1992;25(5):16171625.Google Scholar
Sallam, HN, Sallam, NH. Religious aspects of assisted reproduction. Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 2016;8(1):3348.Google Scholar
Golombok, S, Lycett, E, MacCallum, F et al. Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation. J Fam Psychol, 2004;18(3):443452.Google Scholar
Lycett, E, Daniels, K, Curson, R, Golombok, S. School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents’ disclosure patterns. Hum Reprod, 2005;20(3):810819.Google Scholar
Shehab, D, Duff, J, Pasch, LA et al. How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamics. Fertil Steril, 2008;89(1):179187.Google Scholar
Jadva, V, Freeman, T, Kramer, W, Golombok, S. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Hum Reprod, 2009;24(8):19091919.Google Scholar
Lycett, E, Daniels, K, Curson, R, Golombok, S. Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure. Fertil Steril, 2004;82(1):172179.Google Scholar
Golombok, S, Brewaeys, A, Giavazzi, MT et al. The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence. Hum Reprod, 2002;17(3):830840.Google Scholar
Golombok, S, Readings, J, Blake, L et al. Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7. J Fam Psychol, 2011;25(2):230239.Google Scholar
Fossa, SD, Aass, N, Molne, K. Is routine pre-treatment cryopreservation of semen worthwhile in the management of patients with testicular cancer? Br J Urol, 1989;64(5):524529.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×