Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T20:17:23.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Coulter H. George
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, W. S. (1964) “Transitivity and possession,” Language 40: 337–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American and British Committees of the International Greek New Testament Project (1984–7) The New Testament in Greek: The Gospel According to St. Luke. Oxford
Andersen, P. K. (1993) “Zur Diathese,” Historische Sprachforschung 106: 177–231Google Scholar
Andersen, P. K. (1994) Empirical Studies in Diathesis. Münster
Arce-Arenales, M., M. Axelrod, and B. A. Fox (1994) “Active voice and middle diathesis: a cross-linguistic perspective,” in Fox and Hopper: 1–21
Bakker, E. J. (1994) “Voice, aspect, and Aktionsart: Middle and passive in ancient Greek,” in Fox and Hopper: 23–47
Barber, E. J. W. (1975) “Voice – Beyond the passive,” Berkeley Linguistics Society 1: 16–24Google Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M. (1996) “Residues of non-nominative syntax in Latin: the mihi est construction,” Historische Sprachforschung 109: 241–56Google Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M. (1997) “Nominal syntax in Italic: a diachronic perspective,” in Language Change and Functional Explanations, ed. J. Gvozdanović. Berlin and New York: 273–301
Benveniste, E. (1950) “Actif et moyen dans le verbe,” Journal de Psychologie 43: 121–9Google Scholar
Bernert, E. (1943) “Das Verbalsubstantiv und Verbaladjektiv auf -to-,” Glotta 30: 1–14Google Scholar
Berrettoni, P. (1972) “L’uso del perfetto nel greco omerico,” Studi e saggi linguistici 12: 25–170Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M. and D. Delfitto (2000) “Aspect vs. actionality: Why they should be kept apart,” in Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, ed. Ö. Dahl. Berlin: 189–225
Beševliev, V. (1963) Die protobulgarischen Inschriften. Berlin
Blake, B. (1994) Case. Cambridge
Blass, F. and A. Debrunner (1961) A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, trans. R. W. Funk. Chicago
Boucherie, A. (1872) “ΕΡΜΗΝΕΥΜΑΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΘΗΜΕΡΙΝΗ ΟΜΙΛΙΑ de Julius Pollux,” Notices et Extraits des Manuscripts 23/2: 277–605Google Scholar
Brugmann, K. (1916) Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen vol. II. part III. Strasburg
Burnyeat, M. (1990) The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis and Cambridge
Calhoun, G. M. (1938) “ΟΡΜΗΘΕΙΣ ΘΕΟΥ ΑΡΧΕΤΟ,” Classical Philology 33: 205–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. (1883) The Theaetetus of Plato. Oxford
Campbell, L. (2000) “Valency-changing derivations in K’iche’,” in Dixon and Aikhenvald: 236–81
Chadwick, J. (1996–7) “Three temporal clauses,” Minos 31–2: 293–301Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1927) Histoire du parfait grec. Paris
Chantraine, P. (1963) Grammaire homérique vol. II. Paris
Chantraine, P. (1967) “Le parfait mycénien,” Studi micenei ed egeo-anatolici 3: 19–27Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. ’s-Gravenhage
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass
Classen, J. and J. Steup (1914) Thukydides vol. II, 5th edn. Berlin
De La Villa, J. (1998) “La agentividad en la lengua homérica,” in Nombres y funciones: Estudios de sintaxis griega y latina, ed. M. E. Torrego. Madrid: 147–80
Delbrück, B. (1879) Die Grundlagen der griechischen Syntax. Halle
Delbrück, B. (1888) Altindische Syntax. Halle
Delbrück, B. (1897) Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen part II. Strasburg
Desclés, J.-P., Z. Guentchéva, and S. Shaumyan (1985) Theoretical Aspects of Passivization in the Framework of Applicative Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Devine, A. M. and L. D. Stephens (1994) The Prosody of Greek Speech. New York and Oxford
Dickey, E. (1996) Greek Forms of Address. Oxford
Diès, A. (1924) Platon: Œuvres complètes vol. VIII. part II. Paris
Dik, S. C. (1978) Functional Grammar. Amsterdam
Dixon, R. M. W. (1979) “Ergativity,” Language 55: 59–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1994) Ergativity. Cambridge
Dixon, R. M. W. and A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.) (2000) Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge
Eideneier, H. (1991) Ptochoprodromos: Einführung, kritische Ausgabe, deutsche Übersetzung, Glossar. Cologne
Elliott, W. J. and D. C. Parker (1995) The New Testament in Greek IV: The Gospel According to St. John. Vol. 1: The Papyri. Leiden
Fabricius, C. (1967) “Der sprachliche Klassizismus der griechischen Kirchenväter: ein philologisches und geistesgeschichtliches Problem,” Jahrbuch für Antike & Christentum 10: 187–99Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968) “The case for case,” in Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. E. Bach and R. T. Harms. London: 1–88
Fox, B. and P. J. Hopper (eds.) (1994) Voice: Form and Function. Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Fraenkel, E. (1950) Aeschylus: Agamemnon vol. III. Oxford
Garvie, A. F. (1994) Homer: Odyssey Books VI–VIII. Cambridge
Gildersleeve, B. L. and G. Lodge (1895) Latin Grammar, 3rd edn. London
Givón, T. (1979) On Understanding Grammar. New York
Grahame, K. (1908) The Wind in the Willows. London
Green, A. (1913) The Dative of Agency. New York
Griffith, M. (1977) The Authenticity of “Prometheus Bound”. Cambridge
Hartmann, F. (1935) “Zur Frage der Aspektbildung beim griechischen Futurum,” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 62: 116–31Google Scholar
Hatzidakis, G. N. (1892) Einleitung in die neugriechische Grammatik. Leipzig
Helbing, R. (1904) Die Präpositionen bei Herodot und andern Historikern. Würzburg
Hettrich, H. (1990) “Der Agens in passivischen Sätzen altindogermanischer Sprachen,” Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen 1990: 57–108Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., S. West, and J. P. Hainsworth (1988) A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey vol. I. Oxford
Hoffmann, O. and A. Debrunner (1969) Geschichte der griechischen Sprache vol. I, 4th edn, ed. A. Scherer. Berlin
Hofmann, J. B. and A. Szantyr (1965) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich
Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. A. (1980) “Transitivity in grammar and discourse,” Language 56: 251–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, G. C. (1997) Greek: A History of the Language and its Speakers. London
Hult, K. (1990) Syntactic Variation in Greek of the 5th Century A. D. Gothenburg
Humbert, J. (1960) Syntaxe grecque, 3rd edn. Paris
Jamison, S. W. (1979a) “The case of the agent in Indo-European,” Sprache 25: 129–43Google Scholar
Jamison, S. W. (1979b) “Remarks on the expression of agency with the passive in Vedic and Indo-European,” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 93: 196–219Google Scholar
Jankuhn, H. (1969) Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers. ZVS Ergänzungsheft 21. Göttingen
Jannaris, A. N. (1897) An Historical Greek Grammar, chiefly of the Attic Dialect. London
Jeffreys, E. (1998) Digenis Akritis: The Grottaferrata and Escorial Versions. Cambridge
Joffre, M.-D. (1995) Le verbe latin: voix et diathèse. Louvain
Johannessohn, M. (1925) “Der Gebrauch der Präpositionen in der Septuaginta,” Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (Phil.-hist. Kl.)
Jowett, B. (1953) The Dialogues of Plato vol. III, 4th edn. Oxford
Keil, F. (1963) “Untersuchungen zum Perfektgebrauch Herodots,” Glotta 41: 10–51Google Scholar
Kemmer, S. (1993) The Middle Voice. Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Kemple, B. (1993) Essential Russian Grammar. New York
Kennedy, B. H. (1894) The Theaetetus of Plato. Cambridge
King, R. T. (1988) “Spatial metaphor in German causative constructions,” in Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. B. Rudzka-Ostyn. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: 555–85
Kirk, G. S. (1985) The Iliad: A Commentary vol. I: books I–IV. Cambridge
Klaiman, M. H. (1991) Grammatical Voice. Cambridge
Koster, W. J. W. (1952) “De graecorum genitivo, qui dicitur auctoris; de Od. θ 499,” Mnemosyne (4th series) 5: 89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, R. and B. Gerth (1898) Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache part II. vol. I. Hanover and Leipzig
Kühner, R. and B. Gerth (1904) Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache part II. vol. II. Hanover and Leipzig
Kuryłowicz, J. (1932) “Les désinences moyennes de l’indo-européen et du hittite,” Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 33: 1–4Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. (1964) The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg
Roche, J. (1861) “Beobachtungen über den Gebrauch von ὑπό bei Homer,” Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien 12: 337–77Google Scholar
Lambdin, T. O. (1971) Introduction to Biblical Hebrew. New York
Leaf, W. (1900) The Iliad vol. I, 2nd edn. London
Legg, S. C. E. (1935) Novum Testamentum graece: Euangelium secundum Marcum. Oxford
Legg, S. C. E. (1940) Novum Testamentum graece: Euangelium secundum Matthaeum. Oxford
Lejeune, M. (1939) Les adverbes grecs en -θεν. Bordeaux
Löfstedt, E. (1962) Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae. Darmstadt
Luraghi, S. (1986) “On the distribution of instrumental and agentive markers for human and non-human agents of passive verbs in some Indo-European languages,” Indogermanische Forschungen 91: 48–66Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (1989) “Cause and instrument expression in Classical Greek,” Mnemosyne 42: 294–307Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (1994) “Animate nouns in cause expression,” in Cas et prépositions en grec ancien, ed. B. Jacquinod. St-Etienne: 227–37
Luraghi, S. (1995) “Prototypicality and agenthood in Indo-European,” in Historical Linguistics 1993, ed. H. Andersen. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: 259–68
Luraghi, S. (2000) “Spatial metaphors and agenthood in Ancient Greek,” in 125 Jahre Indogermanistik in Graz, ed. M. Ofitsch and C. Zinko. Graz: 275–90
Luraghi, S. (2001) “Some remarks on Instrument, Comitative, and Agent in Indo-European,” Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54: 385–401Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2003) On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases: The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Lyons, J. (1968) Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge
MacDonell, A. A. (1916) A Vedic Grammar for Students. Oxford
Maiden, M. (1995) A Linguistic History of Italian. London and New York
Mallinson, G. and B. J. Blake (1981) Language Typology: Cross-cultural Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam
Mandilaras, B. G. (1973) The Verb in the Greek Non-literary Papyri. Athens
Matthews, P. H. (1981) Syntax. Cambridge
Mayser, E. (1934) Grammatik der griechischen Papyri aus der Ptolemäerzeit. Vol 2.2. Satzlehre. Analytischer Teil. 2. Hälfte. Berlin and Leipzig
McKay, K. L. (1965) “The use of the Ancient Greek perfect down to the second century A. D.,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 12: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, K. L. (1980) “On the perfect and other aspects in the Greek non-literary papyri,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 27: 23–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meid, W. (1971) Das germanische Präteritum. Innsbruck
Menge, H., T. Burkard, and M. Schauer (2000) Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt
Metzger, B. M. (1992) The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 3rd edn. New York and Oxford
Mitchell, B. (1985) Old English Syntax vol. I. Oxford
Monro, D. B. (1891) Homeric Grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford
Moorhouse, A. C. (1982) The Syntax of Sophocles. Leiden
Moule, C. F. D. (1963) An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek. Cambridge
Moulton, J. H. (1976) A Grammar of New Testament Greek. Edinburgh
Müller, G. (1968) Studien zu den platonischen Nomoi. Munich
Müller, N. (1999) Agents in Early Welsh and Early Irish. Oxford
Mustanoja, T. F. (1960) A Middle English Syntax part I. Helsinki
Nau, N. (1998) Latvian. Munich
Nestle, E. (1896) Novi Testamenti Graeci supplementum. Leipzig
Palmer, F. R. (1994) Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge
Palmer, L. R. (1963) The Interpretation of Mycenaean Greek Texts. Oxford
Panhuis, D. (1984) “Topic shift and other discourse functions of passives in Latin narratives,” Glotta 62: 232–40Google Scholar
Penny, R. (1991) A History of the Spanish Language. Cambridge
Powell, J. E. (1938) A Lexicon to Herodotus. Cambridge
Radford, A. (1988) Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge
Risselada, R. (1991) “Passive, perspective and textual cohesion,” in New Studies in Latin Linguistics, ed. R. Coleman. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: 401–14
Rix, H. (1988) “The Proto-Indo-European middle: Content, forms, and origin,” Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 49: 101–19Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (1999) Latine loqui. Munich
Rusten, J. S. (1989) Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War Book II. Cambridge
Rutherford, R. B. (1995) The Art of Plato. London
Sauge, A. (2000) Les degrés du verbe: Sens et formation du parfait en grec ancien. Berne
Schmid, W. (1948) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur part I. vol. V. Munich
Schmidt, K. H. (1963) “Zum Agens beim Passiv,” Indogermanische Forschungen 68: 1–12Google Scholar
Schwyzer, E. (1939) Griechische Grammatik vol. I. Munich
Schwyzer, E. (1943) “Zum persönlichen Agens beim Passiv, besonders im Griechischen,” Abhandlungen der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Phil.-hist. Kl.) 1942/10
Schwyzer, E. and A. Debrunner (1950) Griechische Grammatik vol. II. Munich
Siewierska, A. (1984) The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London
Silverstein, M. (1976) “Hierarchy of features and ergativity,” in Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, ed. R. M. W. Dixon. Canberra: 112–71
Slings, S. R. (1986) “ΕΙΛΗΦΑ,” Glotta 64: 9–14Google Scholar
Smyth, H. W. (1920) Greek Grammar. Cambridge, Mass
Snell, B. (1937) Euripides Alexandros und andere Straßburger Papyri mit Fragmenten griechischer Dichter. Hermes Einzelschrift 5. Berlin
Stang, C. (1932) “Perfektum und Medium,” Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 6: 29–39Google Scholar
Stempel, R. (1995) “Stative, Perfekt und Medium: Eine vergleichende Analyse für das Indogermanische und Semitische,” in Kuryłowicz Memorial Volume part I, ed. W. Smoczyński. Cracow: 517–28
Stempel, R. (1996) Die Diathese im Indogermanischen. Innsbruck
Strunk, K. (1980) “Zum idg. Medium und konkurrierenden Kategorien,” in Wege zur Universalienforschung, ed. G. Brettschneider and C. Lehrmann. Tübingen: 321–37
Szemerényi, O. J. L. (1996) Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics. Oxford
Touratier, C. (1994) Syntaxe latine. Louvain
Tucker, E. F. (1990) The Creation of Morphological Regularity: Early Greek Verbs in -έω, -άω, -όω, -ύω, -ίω. Göttingen
Van Valin, R. D., Jr. (2001) An Introduction to Syntax. Cambridge
Ventris, M. and J. Chadwick (1973) Documents in Mycenaean Greek, 2nd edn. Cambridge
Wackernagel, J. (1904) Studien zum griechischen Perfektum. Göttingen
Wackernagel, J. (1950) Vorlesungen über Syntax vol. I, 2nd edn. Basel
Waltke, B. K. and M. O’Connor (1990) An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. Winona Lake, Ind
Waterfield, R. A. H. (1987) Plato: Theaetetus. Harmondsworth
West, M. L. (1987) Introduction to Greek Metre. Oxford
Whitney, W. D. (1889) Sanskrit Grammar, 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass
Wierzbicka, A. (1981) “Case marking and human nature,” Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 43–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlrab, M. (1891) Platonis Theaetetus. Leipzig
Allen, W. S. (1964) “Transitivity and possession,” Language 40: 337–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American and British Committees of the International Greek New Testament Project (1984–7) The New Testament in Greek: The Gospel According to St. Luke. Oxford
Andersen, P. K. (1993) “Zur Diathese,” Historische Sprachforschung 106: 177–231Google Scholar
Andersen, P. K. (1994) Empirical Studies in Diathesis. Münster
Arce-Arenales, M., M. Axelrod, and B. A. Fox (1994) “Active voice and middle diathesis: a cross-linguistic perspective,” in Fox and Hopper: 1–21
Bakker, E. J. (1994) “Voice, aspect, and Aktionsart: Middle and passive in ancient Greek,” in Fox and Hopper: 23–47
Barber, E. J. W. (1975) “Voice – Beyond the passive,” Berkeley Linguistics Society 1: 16–24Google Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M. (1996) “Residues of non-nominative syntax in Latin: the mihi est construction,” Historische Sprachforschung 109: 241–56Google Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M. (1997) “Nominal syntax in Italic: a diachronic perspective,” in Language Change and Functional Explanations, ed. J. Gvozdanović. Berlin and New York: 273–301
Benveniste, E. (1950) “Actif et moyen dans le verbe,” Journal de Psychologie 43: 121–9Google Scholar
Bernert, E. (1943) “Das Verbalsubstantiv und Verbaladjektiv auf -to-,” Glotta 30: 1–14Google Scholar
Berrettoni, P. (1972) “L’uso del perfetto nel greco omerico,” Studi e saggi linguistici 12: 25–170Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M. and D. Delfitto (2000) “Aspect vs. actionality: Why they should be kept apart,” in Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, ed. Ö. Dahl. Berlin: 189–225
Beševliev, V. (1963) Die protobulgarischen Inschriften. Berlin
Blake, B. (1994) Case. Cambridge
Blass, F. and A. Debrunner (1961) A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, trans. R. W. Funk. Chicago
Boucherie, A. (1872) “ΕΡΜΗΝΕΥΜΑΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΘΗΜΕΡΙΝΗ ΟΜΙΛΙΑ de Julius Pollux,” Notices et Extraits des Manuscripts 23/2: 277–605Google Scholar
Brugmann, K. (1916) Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen vol. II. part III. Strasburg
Burnyeat, M. (1990) The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis and Cambridge
Calhoun, G. M. (1938) “ΟΡΜΗΘΕΙΣ ΘΕΟΥ ΑΡΧΕΤΟ,” Classical Philology 33: 205–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. (1883) The Theaetetus of Plato. Oxford
Campbell, L. (2000) “Valency-changing derivations in K’iche’,” in Dixon and Aikhenvald: 236–81
Chadwick, J. (1996–7) “Three temporal clauses,” Minos 31–2: 293–301Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1927) Histoire du parfait grec. Paris
Chantraine, P. (1963) Grammaire homérique vol. II. Paris
Chantraine, P. (1967) “Le parfait mycénien,” Studi micenei ed egeo-anatolici 3: 19–27Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. ’s-Gravenhage
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass
Classen, J. and J. Steup (1914) Thukydides vol. II, 5th edn. Berlin
De La Villa, J. (1998) “La agentividad en la lengua homérica,” in Nombres y funciones: Estudios de sintaxis griega y latina, ed. M. E. Torrego. Madrid: 147–80
Delbrück, B. (1879) Die Grundlagen der griechischen Syntax. Halle
Delbrück, B. (1888) Altindische Syntax. Halle
Delbrück, B. (1897) Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen part II. Strasburg
Desclés, J.-P., Z. Guentchéva, and S. Shaumyan (1985) Theoretical Aspects of Passivization in the Framework of Applicative Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Devine, A. M. and L. D. Stephens (1994) The Prosody of Greek Speech. New York and Oxford
Dickey, E. (1996) Greek Forms of Address. Oxford
Diès, A. (1924) Platon: Œuvres complètes vol. VIII. part II. Paris
Dik, S. C. (1978) Functional Grammar. Amsterdam
Dixon, R. M. W. (1979) “Ergativity,” Language 55: 59–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1994) Ergativity. Cambridge
Dixon, R. M. W. and A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.) (2000) Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge
Eideneier, H. (1991) Ptochoprodromos: Einführung, kritische Ausgabe, deutsche Übersetzung, Glossar. Cologne
Elliott, W. J. and D. C. Parker (1995) The New Testament in Greek IV: The Gospel According to St. John. Vol. 1: The Papyri. Leiden
Fabricius, C. (1967) “Der sprachliche Klassizismus der griechischen Kirchenväter: ein philologisches und geistesgeschichtliches Problem,” Jahrbuch für Antike & Christentum 10: 187–99Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968) “The case for case,” in Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. E. Bach and R. T. Harms. London: 1–88
Fox, B. and P. J. Hopper (eds.) (1994) Voice: Form and Function. Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Fraenkel, E. (1950) Aeschylus: Agamemnon vol. III. Oxford
Garvie, A. F. (1994) Homer: Odyssey Books VI–VIII. Cambridge
Gildersleeve, B. L. and G. Lodge (1895) Latin Grammar, 3rd edn. London
Givón, T. (1979) On Understanding Grammar. New York
Grahame, K. (1908) The Wind in the Willows. London
Green, A. (1913) The Dative of Agency. New York
Griffith, M. (1977) The Authenticity of “Prometheus Bound”. Cambridge
Hartmann, F. (1935) “Zur Frage der Aspektbildung beim griechischen Futurum,” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 62: 116–31Google Scholar
Hatzidakis, G. N. (1892) Einleitung in die neugriechische Grammatik. Leipzig
Helbing, R. (1904) Die Präpositionen bei Herodot und andern Historikern. Würzburg
Hettrich, H. (1990) “Der Agens in passivischen Sätzen altindogermanischer Sprachen,” Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen 1990: 57–108Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., S. West, and J. P. Hainsworth (1988) A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey vol. I. Oxford
Hoffmann, O. and A. Debrunner (1969) Geschichte der griechischen Sprache vol. I, 4th edn, ed. A. Scherer. Berlin
Hofmann, J. B. and A. Szantyr (1965) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich
Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. A. (1980) “Transitivity in grammar and discourse,” Language 56: 251–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, G. C. (1997) Greek: A History of the Language and its Speakers. London
Hult, K. (1990) Syntactic Variation in Greek of the 5th Century A. D. Gothenburg
Humbert, J. (1960) Syntaxe grecque, 3rd edn. Paris
Jamison, S. W. (1979a) “The case of the agent in Indo-European,” Sprache 25: 129–43Google Scholar
Jamison, S. W. (1979b) “Remarks on the expression of agency with the passive in Vedic and Indo-European,” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 93: 196–219Google Scholar
Jankuhn, H. (1969) Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers. ZVS Ergänzungsheft 21. Göttingen
Jannaris, A. N. (1897) An Historical Greek Grammar, chiefly of the Attic Dialect. London
Jeffreys, E. (1998) Digenis Akritis: The Grottaferrata and Escorial Versions. Cambridge
Joffre, M.-D. (1995) Le verbe latin: voix et diathèse. Louvain
Johannessohn, M. (1925) “Der Gebrauch der Präpositionen in der Septuaginta,” Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (Phil.-hist. Kl.)
Jowett, B. (1953) The Dialogues of Plato vol. III, 4th edn. Oxford
Keil, F. (1963) “Untersuchungen zum Perfektgebrauch Herodots,” Glotta 41: 10–51Google Scholar
Kemmer, S. (1993) The Middle Voice. Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Kemple, B. (1993) Essential Russian Grammar. New York
Kennedy, B. H. (1894) The Theaetetus of Plato. Cambridge
King, R. T. (1988) “Spatial metaphor in German causative constructions,” in Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. B. Rudzka-Ostyn. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: 555–85
Kirk, G. S. (1985) The Iliad: A Commentary vol. I: books I–IV. Cambridge
Klaiman, M. H. (1991) Grammatical Voice. Cambridge
Koster, W. J. W. (1952) “De graecorum genitivo, qui dicitur auctoris; de Od. θ 499,” Mnemosyne (4th series) 5: 89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, R. and B. Gerth (1898) Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache part II. vol. I. Hanover and Leipzig
Kühner, R. and B. Gerth (1904) Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache part II. vol. II. Hanover and Leipzig
Kuryłowicz, J. (1932) “Les désinences moyennes de l’indo-européen et du hittite,” Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 33: 1–4Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. (1964) The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg
Roche, J. (1861) “Beobachtungen über den Gebrauch von ὑπό bei Homer,” Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien 12: 337–77Google Scholar
Lambdin, T. O. (1971) Introduction to Biblical Hebrew. New York
Leaf, W. (1900) The Iliad vol. I, 2nd edn. London
Legg, S. C. E. (1935) Novum Testamentum graece: Euangelium secundum Marcum. Oxford
Legg, S. C. E. (1940) Novum Testamentum graece: Euangelium secundum Matthaeum. Oxford
Lejeune, M. (1939) Les adverbes grecs en -θεν. Bordeaux
Löfstedt, E. (1962) Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae. Darmstadt
Luraghi, S. (1986) “On the distribution of instrumental and agentive markers for human and non-human agents of passive verbs in some Indo-European languages,” Indogermanische Forschungen 91: 48–66Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (1989) “Cause and instrument expression in Classical Greek,” Mnemosyne 42: 294–307Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (1994) “Animate nouns in cause expression,” in Cas et prépositions en grec ancien, ed. B. Jacquinod. St-Etienne: 227–37
Luraghi, S. (1995) “Prototypicality and agenthood in Indo-European,” in Historical Linguistics 1993, ed. H. Andersen. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: 259–68
Luraghi, S. (2000) “Spatial metaphors and agenthood in Ancient Greek,” in 125 Jahre Indogermanistik in Graz, ed. M. Ofitsch and C. Zinko. Graz: 275–90
Luraghi, S. (2001) “Some remarks on Instrument, Comitative, and Agent in Indo-European,” Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54: 385–401Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2003) On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases: The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam and Philadelphia
Lyons, J. (1968) Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge
MacDonell, A. A. (1916) A Vedic Grammar for Students. Oxford
Maiden, M. (1995) A Linguistic History of Italian. London and New York
Mallinson, G. and B. J. Blake (1981) Language Typology: Cross-cultural Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam
Mandilaras, B. G. (1973) The Verb in the Greek Non-literary Papyri. Athens
Matthews, P. H. (1981) Syntax. Cambridge
Mayser, E. (1934) Grammatik der griechischen Papyri aus der Ptolemäerzeit. Vol 2.2. Satzlehre. Analytischer Teil. 2. Hälfte. Berlin and Leipzig
McKay, K. L. (1965) “The use of the Ancient Greek perfect down to the second century A. D.,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 12: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, K. L. (1980) “On the perfect and other aspects in the Greek non-literary papyri,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 27: 23–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meid, W. (1971) Das germanische Präteritum. Innsbruck
Menge, H., T. Burkard, and M. Schauer (2000) Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt
Metzger, B. M. (1992) The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 3rd edn. New York and Oxford
Mitchell, B. (1985) Old English Syntax vol. I. Oxford
Monro, D. B. (1891) Homeric Grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford
Moorhouse, A. C. (1982) The Syntax of Sophocles. Leiden
Moule, C. F. D. (1963) An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek. Cambridge
Moulton, J. H. (1976) A Grammar of New Testament Greek. Edinburgh
Müller, G. (1968) Studien zu den platonischen Nomoi. Munich
Müller, N. (1999) Agents in Early Welsh and Early Irish. Oxford
Mustanoja, T. F. (1960) A Middle English Syntax part I. Helsinki
Nau, N. (1998) Latvian. Munich
Nestle, E. (1896) Novi Testamenti Graeci supplementum. Leipzig
Palmer, F. R. (1994) Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge
Palmer, L. R. (1963) The Interpretation of Mycenaean Greek Texts. Oxford
Panhuis, D. (1984) “Topic shift and other discourse functions of passives in Latin narratives,” Glotta 62: 232–40Google Scholar
Penny, R. (1991) A History of the Spanish Language. Cambridge
Powell, J. E. (1938) A Lexicon to Herodotus. Cambridge
Radford, A. (1988) Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge
Risselada, R. (1991) “Passive, perspective and textual cohesion,” in New Studies in Latin Linguistics, ed. R. Coleman. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: 401–14
Rix, H. (1988) “The Proto-Indo-European middle: Content, forms, and origin,” Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 49: 101–19Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (1999) Latine loqui. Munich
Rusten, J. S. (1989) Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War Book II. Cambridge
Rutherford, R. B. (1995) The Art of Plato. London
Sauge, A. (2000) Les degrés du verbe: Sens et formation du parfait en grec ancien. Berne
Schmid, W. (1948) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur part I. vol. V. Munich
Schmidt, K. H. (1963) “Zum Agens beim Passiv,” Indogermanische Forschungen 68: 1–12Google Scholar
Schwyzer, E. (1939) Griechische Grammatik vol. I. Munich
Schwyzer, E. (1943) “Zum persönlichen Agens beim Passiv, besonders im Griechischen,” Abhandlungen der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Phil.-hist. Kl.) 1942/10
Schwyzer, E. and A. Debrunner (1950) Griechische Grammatik vol. II. Munich
Siewierska, A. (1984) The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London
Silverstein, M. (1976) “Hierarchy of features and ergativity,” in Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, ed. R. M. W. Dixon. Canberra: 112–71
Slings, S. R. (1986) “ΕΙΛΗΦΑ,” Glotta 64: 9–14Google Scholar
Smyth, H. W. (1920) Greek Grammar. Cambridge, Mass
Snell, B. (1937) Euripides Alexandros und andere Straßburger Papyri mit Fragmenten griechischer Dichter. Hermes Einzelschrift 5. Berlin
Stang, C. (1932) “Perfektum und Medium,” Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 6: 29–39Google Scholar
Stempel, R. (1995) “Stative, Perfekt und Medium: Eine vergleichende Analyse für das Indogermanische und Semitische,” in Kuryłowicz Memorial Volume part I, ed. W. Smoczyński. Cracow: 517–28
Stempel, R. (1996) Die Diathese im Indogermanischen. Innsbruck
Strunk, K. (1980) “Zum idg. Medium und konkurrierenden Kategorien,” in Wege zur Universalienforschung, ed. G. Brettschneider and C. Lehrmann. Tübingen: 321–37
Szemerényi, O. J. L. (1996) Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics. Oxford
Touratier, C. (1994) Syntaxe latine. Louvain
Tucker, E. F. (1990) The Creation of Morphological Regularity: Early Greek Verbs in -έω, -άω, -όω, -ύω, -ίω. Göttingen
Van Valin, R. D., Jr. (2001) An Introduction to Syntax. Cambridge
Ventris, M. and J. Chadwick (1973) Documents in Mycenaean Greek, 2nd edn. Cambridge
Wackernagel, J. (1904) Studien zum griechischen Perfektum. Göttingen
Wackernagel, J. (1950) Vorlesungen über Syntax vol. I, 2nd edn. Basel
Waltke, B. K. and M. O’Connor (1990) An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. Winona Lake, Ind
Waterfield, R. A. H. (1987) Plato: Theaetetus. Harmondsworth
West, M. L. (1987) Introduction to Greek Metre. Oxford
Whitney, W. D. (1889) Sanskrit Grammar, 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass
Wierzbicka, A. (1981) “Case marking and human nature,” Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 43–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlrab, M. (1891) Platonis Theaetetus. Leipzig

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Coulter H. George, Trinity College, Cambridge
  • Book: Expressions of Agency in Ancient Greek
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482984.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Coulter H. George, Trinity College, Cambridge
  • Book: Expressions of Agency in Ancient Greek
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482984.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Coulter H. George, Trinity College, Cambridge
  • Book: Expressions of Agency in Ancient Greek
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482984.008
Available formats
×