Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-p4n5r Total loading time: 0.463 Render date: 2022-06-26T00:03:45.574Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

1 - Embodied Inter-Practices in Resonance as New Forms of Working in Organisations

from Part I - Experiencing at Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2020

Jeremy Aroles
Affiliation:
Durham University
François-Xavier de Vaujany
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Dauphine
Karen Dale
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents how a phenomenological approach can help developing a more integral and relational understanding of embodied and resonant practices of new work in organisations. Building on seeing work as situationally and temporally placed, the concept of ‘inter-practice’ will be discussed. In such relational practices material, economic and socio-cultural, political dimensions come together. Based on a Merleau-Pontyian inspired phenomenology of embodied practicing, the processual concept of “inter-practice” is presented. Afterword the relational mode of ‘resonance’ as developed by Rosa will be presented and critically discussed and by concluding some implications and perspectives offered.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aroles, J., Mitev, N. & de Vaujany, F.-X. 2019. Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3): 285299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aroles, J., Granter, E. & de Vaujany, F.-X. 2020. Becoming mainstream: The professionalization and corporatization of digital nomadism. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(1): 114129.Google Scholar
Bailey, C., Lips-Wiersma, M., Madden, A., Yeoman, R., Thompson, M. & Chalofsky, N. 2019. The five paradoxes of meaningful work. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3): 481499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, K. 2005. Organization, surveillance and the body: Towards a politics of resistance. Organization 12(1): 89108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhamou, S. 2017. Imaginer le travail en 2030? Quatre types d’organisation du travail à l’horizon 2030. Paris: France Strategie.Google Scholar
Blue, S. 2019. Institutional rhythms: Combining practice theory and rhythmanalysis to conceptualise processes of institutionalisation. Time & Society, 28(3): 922950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E. & McKee, A. 2005. Resonant Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Carter, C., Clegg, S. & Kornberger, M. 2008. Strategy as practice? Strategic Organization, 6(1): 8399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascio, W. F. & Montealegre, R. 2016. How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3: 349375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L. & Nath, R. 2005. Nomadic culture: Cultural support for working anytime, anywhere. Information Systems Management, 22(4): 5664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, D. 2005. Rethinking agency: A phenomenological approach to embodiment and agentic capacities. Political Studies, 53(1): 124142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, D. 2007. Merleau-Ponty and Modern Politics after Anti-Humanism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dale, K. 2001. Anatomising Embodiment and Organisation Theory. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E. 2015. TechGnosis: Myth, Magic, and Mysticism in the Age of Information. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Press.Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Degen, M. 2008. Sensing Cities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N. 2016. The Call to Performance. In Reinertsen, A. B. (ed.) Becoming Earth: A Post Human Turn in Educational Discourse Collapsing Nature/Culture Divides. Otterstad: Sense Publishers, 137161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diprose, R. 2002. Corporeal Generosity: On Giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ebert, N. 2016. Individualisation at Work: The Self between Freedom and Social Pathologies. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M. & Bacevice, P. A. 2017. Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6): 821842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2006. A Post-Capitalist Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. 2006. Bodies in Code: Interfaces with New Media. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. 2014. Feed Forward: On the Future of 21st Century Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, P. 2009. Management and Colonization in Everyday Life. In Hancock, P. and Tyler, M. (eds.) The Management of Everyday Life. London: Palgrave, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1993. The Question Concerning Technology. In Heidegger, M. (ed.) Basic Writings. New York: Harper, 307342.Google Scholar
Hoel, A. S. & Carusi, A. 2018. Merleau-Ponty and the Measuring Body. Theory, Culture and Society, 35(1): 4570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Kaushik, R. 2019. Merleau-Ponty between Philosophy and Symbolism: The Matrixed Ontology. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kellerman, B. 2004. Bad Leadership: What It Is, How It Happens, Why It Matters. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kemmis, S. 2012. Phronēsis, Experience, and the Primacy of Praxis. In Kinsella, E. A. & Pitman, A. (eds.) Phronēsis as Professional Knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense, 147162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmis, S., Edwards-Groves, C., Wilkinson, J. & Hardy, I. 2012. Ecologies of Practices. In Hager, P., Lee, A. & Reich, A. (eds.) Practice, Learning and Change. Professional and Practice-based Learning. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kemmis, S. & Smith, T. 2008. Prâxis and Prâxis Development. In Kemmis, S. and Smith, T. (eds.) Enabling Prâxis: Challenges for Education. Rotterdam: Sense, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Hardy, I. & Edwards-Groves, C. 2009. Leading and learning: Developing ecologies of educational practice. Paper presented at AARE (Australian Association for Research in Education) International Conference. Canberra.Google Scholar
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P. & Bristol, L. 2014. Changing Education: Changing Practices. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingma, S. 2019. New ways of working (NWW): Work space and cultural change in virtualizing organizations. Culture and Organization, 25(5): 383406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozel, S. 2007. Closer Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Küpers, W. 2011. Embodied pheno-pragma-practice – Phenomenological and pragmatic perspectives on creative ‘inter-practice’ in organisations between habits and improvisation. Phenomenology & Practice, 5(1): 100139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küpers, W. 2013a. The Art of Practical Wisdom ~ Phenomenology of an Embodied, Wise Inter-Practice in Organisation and Leadership. In Küpers, W. & Pauleen, D. (eds.) A Handbook of Practical Wisdom. Leadership, Organization and Integral Business Practice. London: Routledge, 1945.Google Scholar
Küpers, W. 2013b. Embodied Inter-Practices of Leadership. Leadership, 9(3): 335357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küpers, W. 2015a. Phenomenology of the Embodied Organization – The Contribution of Merleau-Ponty for Organisation Studies and Practice. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Küpers, W. 2015b. Emplaced and embodied mobility in organizations. Ephemera- Theory & Politics in Organizations, 15(4): 797823.Google Scholar
Küpers, W. 2016. Phenomenology of embodied and artful design for creative and sustainable inter-practicing in organisations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135(1): 14361445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küpers, W. 2017a. Inter-Play(ing) – Embodied possibilities of serious play at work. Journal of Organisation and Change Management, 30(7): 9931014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küpers, W. 2017b. Embodied performance and performativity in organizations and management. M@n@gement, 20(1): 89106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küpers, W. 2019. Reintegrating prâxis, practices, phrónêsis & sustainable action for processing systemic constraints in the business and society relationship. Society and Business Review, 14(4): 338359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leder, D. 1990. The Absent Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lips-Wiersma, M., Haar, J. & Wright, S. 2020. The effect of fairness, responsible leadership and worthy work on multiple dimensions of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(1): 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lips-Wiersma, M. & Morris, L. 2017. The Map of Meaningful Work: A Practical Guide to Sustaining our Humanity. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupton, D. 1995. The Embodied Computer/User. In Featherstone, M. & Burrows, R. (eds.) Cyberspace, Cyberbodies, Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment. London: SAGE, 97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D. & Steger, M. F. 2019. Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(B): 374389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandich, G. 2019. Modes of engagement with the future in everyday life. Time and Society. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X19883749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1973. The Algorithm and the Mystery of Language. In Lefort, C. (ed.) The Prose of the World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1995. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 2003. Nature. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M, 2010. Institution and Passivity. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merry, P. 2019. Why Work? Economics and Work for People and Planet. Minneapolis, MN: Amaranth Press.Google Scholar
Müller, A. 2016. The digital nomad: Buzzword or research category? Transnational Social Review, 6(3): 344348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. & Yanow, D. 2003. Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J. & Wrzesniewski, A. 2019. Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1): 124170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, H. 2016. Resonance. A Sociology of our Relationship to the World. Translated by Wagner, James C.. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. 2019. Resonance. A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, H., Dörre, K. & Lessenich, S. 2017. Appropriation, activation and acceleration: The escalatory logics of capitalist modernity and the crises of dynamic stabilization. Theory, Culture and Society, 34(1): 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, J. & Dall’Alba, G. 2010. Learning through and about Practice: A Lifeworld Perspective. In Billett, S. (ed.) Learning through Practice. Dordrecht: Springer, 104119.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J. & Dall'Alba, G. 2009. Returning to practice anew: A life-world perspective. Organization Studies, 30(12): 13491368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Susen, S. 2019. The resonance of resonance: Critical theory as a sociology of world-relations? International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 1–36.Google Scholar
Symon, G. & Whiting, R. 2019. The sociomaterial negotiation of social entrepreneurs’ meaningful work. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3): 655684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldenfels, B. 2008. The role of the lived-body in feeling. Continental Philosophy Review, 41(2): 127142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendland, C., Merwin, C. & Hadjioannou, C. 2018. Heidegger on Technology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakhlef, A. 2010. The corporeality of practice-based learning. Organization Studies, 31(4): 409430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeoman, R., Bailey, C., Madden, A. & Thompson, M. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Meaningful Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×