Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-npccv Total loading time: 0.684 Render date: 2022-09-27T18:20:09.123Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Part II - Digital Platforms and the New World of Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2020

Jeremy Aroles
Durham University
François-Xavier de Vaujany
Université Paris-Dauphine
Karen Dale
Lancaster University
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Acker, J. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organization. Gender & Society, 42(2): 139158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acker, J. 2006. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4): 441464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackroyd, S. & Muzio, D. 2007. The reconstructed professional firm: Explaining change in English legal practices. Organisation Studies, 28(5): 729747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, A. & Berg, J. 2017. When home affects pay: An analysis of the gender pay gap among crowdworkers. Available at SSRN: or Scholar
Barzilay, A. & Ben-David, A. 2017. Platform inequality: Gender in the gig-economy. Seton Hall Law Review, 47(2): 393431.Google Scholar
Berg, J. 2016. Income security in the on-demand economy: Findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3): 543576.Google Scholar
Blaikie, N. 2000. Designing Social Research. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bolton, S. & Muzio, D. 2008. The paradoxical processes of feminisation in the professions: The case of established, aspiring and semi-professions. Work, Employment and Society, 22(2): 281299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caves, R. E. 2000. Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gandini, A. 2019. Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72(6): 10391056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, E. 2011. Regulating Reputation. In Masum, H. and Tovey, M. (eds.) The Reputation Society: How Online Opinions are Reshaping the Offline World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 51-62.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. 2006. Women, careers, and work-life preferences. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 34(3): 279294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, W. & Jefferson, T. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research Differently. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howcroft, D. & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. 2019. A typology of crowdwork platforms. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1): 2138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO 2016. Non-standard Employment around the World: Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
ILO 2018. World Employment and Social Outlook – Trends 2018. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Irani, L. 2015. The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society, 17(5): 720739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, D. & Wajcman, J. 1985. The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Peticca-Harris, A., deGama, N. & Ravishankar, M. N. 2020. Postcapitalist precarious work and those in the ‘drivers’ seat: Exploring the motivations and lived experiences of Uber drivers in Canada. Organization, 27(1): 3659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, J. 1995. Gender Trials: Emotional Lives in Contemporary Law Firms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pinnington, A. H. & Sandberg, J. 2013. Lawyers’ professional careers: Increasing women’s inclusion in the partnership of law firms. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(6): 616631.Google Scholar
Pringle, J. K., Harris, C., Ravenswood, K., Giddings, L., Ryan, I. & Jaeger, S. 2017. Women’s career progression in law firms: Views from the top, views from below. Gender, Work and Organization, 24(4): 435449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1976. Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubery, J. 2019. Joan Acker and doing comparable worth. Gender, Work and Organization, 26(12): 17861793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schorpf, P., Flecker, J., Schönauer, A. & Eichmann, H. 2017. Triangular love–hate: management and control in creative crowdworking. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(1): 4358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, T. 2015. What's Yours Is Mine: Against the Sharing Economy. New York: OR Books.Google Scholar
Sommerlad, H. 2016. ‘A pit to put women in’: Professionalism, work intensification, sexualisation and work-life balance in the legal profession in England and Wales. International Journal of the Legal profession, 23(1): 6182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerlad, H., Webley, L., Duff, L., Muzio, D. & Tomlinson, J. 2017. Diversity in the legal profession in England and Wales: a qualitative study of barriers and individual choices. Available at: Scholar
Srnicek, N. 2017 Platform Capitalism. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sundararajan, A. 2016. The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-based Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Susskind, R. 2017. Tomorrow’s Lawyers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, P., Jones, M. & Warhurst, C. 2007. From conception to consumption: creativity and the missing managerial link. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(5): 625640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, J., Muzio, D., Sommerlad, H., Webley, L. & Duff, L. 2013. Structure, agency and career strategies of white women and black and minority ethnic individuals in the legal profession. Human Relations, 66(2): 245269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, J., Valizade, D., Muzio, D., Charlwood, A. & Aulakh, S. 2019. Privileges and penalties in the legal profession: An intersectional analysis of career progression. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(3): 10451066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wajcman, J. 2018. Digital technology, work extension and the acceleration society. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(3–4): 168176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, J. 2012. Not worth the sacrifice? Women’s aspirations and career progression in law firms. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(5): 508531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V. & Hjorth, I. 2019. Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1): 5675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed


Aslam, Y. & Woodcock, J. 2020. A history of Uber organizing in the UK. South Atlantic Quarterly, 119(2): 412421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badger, A. & Woodcock, J. 2019. Ethnographic Methods with Limited Access: Assessing Quality of Work in Hard to Reach Jobs. In Wheatley, D. (ed.) Handbook of Research Methods on the Quality of Working Lives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 135146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brant, M. & Santori, E. 1953. A Women’s Place. New Writers.Google Scholar
Brook, P. & Darlington, R. 2013. Partisan, scholarly and active: Arguments for an organic public sociology of work. Work, Employment & Society, 27(2): 232243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, M. 1998. The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1): 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cant, C. 2019. Riding for Deliveroo: Resistance in the New Economy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Cant, C. & Woodcock, J. 2019. The End of the Beginning. Notes from Below, issue 7, Scholar
Casilli, A. 2017. Global digital culture| digital labor studies go global: Toward a digital decolonial turn. International Journal of Communication, 11: 39343954.Google Scholar
Cleaver, H. 1979. Reading Capital Politically. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Denby, C. 1989. Indignant Heart: A Black Worker’s Journal. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. 2017. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114: 254280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaberman, M. 1947. Strata in the working class. Internal Bulletin of the Johnson-Forest Tendency, 6. Available at: Scholar
Gupta, N., Martin, D., Hanrahan, B. & O'Neill, J. 2014. Turk‐Life in India. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 14) Sanibel Island, 9–12 November.Google Scholar
Haider, A. & Mohandesi, S. 2013. Workers’ Inquiry: A Genealogy. Viewpoint Magazine, issue 3.Google Scholar
Hara, K., Adams, A., Milland, K., Savage, S., Callison-Burch, C. & Bigham, J. P. 2018. A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers’ Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paper No. 449, New York: ACM New York.Google Scholar
Heeks, R. 2017. Decent Work and the Digital Gig Economy: A Developing Country Perspective on Employment Impacts and Standards in Online Outsourcing, Crowdwork, etc. Paper No. 71, Manchester: Centre for Development Informatics, Global Development Institute, SEED.Google Scholar
Hill, S. 2017. Raw Deal: How the ‘Uber Economy’ and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Holts, K. 2013. Towards a taxonomy of virtual work. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 7(1): 3150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, A. & Machingura, F. 2016. A Good Gig? The Rise of On-Demand Domestic Work. ODI Development Progress, Working Paper 7.Google Scholar
Huws, U. & Joyce, S. 2016. Crowd Working Survey: Size of the UK’s ‘Gig Economy’. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Irani, L. 2015. The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society, 17(5): 720739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irani, L. & Silberman, M. S. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of CHI 2013, Apr 28-May 2, 2013.Google Scholar
Kolinko, . 2002. Hotlines – call centre, inquiry, communism. Available at: www.prol-position.netGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Metsky, E. & Dabbish, L. 2015. Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic, Data-Driven Management on Human Workers. In Begole, B., Kim, J., Inkpen, K. and Wood, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM SIGCHI Conference. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy Vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Notes from Below (editors) 2018. The Workers’ Inquiry and Social Composition. Notes from Below, issue 1, Scholar
Ojanperä, S. & Graham, M. 2018. Mapping the Availability of Online Workers — Oxford Internet Institute. Retrieved 29 October 2018, from Scholar
Pasquale, F. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravenelle, A. 2019. Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. 2008. Sage Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roggero, G. 2010 Romano Alquati — militant researcher, operaist, autonomist, marxist — has passed away, Age 75. fuckyeahmilitantresearch, available at: Scholar
Romano, P. & Stone, R. 1946. The American Worker. Detroit, MI: Facing Reality Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Rosenblat, A. 2018. Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblat, A. & Stark, L. 2016. Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10: 37583784.Google Scholar
Salehi, N., Irani, L. C., Bernstein, M. S., Alkhatib, A., Ogbe, E. & Milland, K. 2015. We Are Dynamo: Overcoming Stalling and Friction in Collective Action for Crowd Workers. Proceedings of CHI 2015, Apr 18–Apr 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Scholz, T. 2017. Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Slee, T. 2015. What’s Yours Is Mine: Against the Sharing Economy. London: OR Books.Google Scholar
Srnicek, N. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Sundararajan, A. 2017. The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. 1967. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ticona, J. & Mateescu, A. 2018. Trusted strangers: Carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy. New Media and Society, 20(11): 43844404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronti, M. 2019. Workers and Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
van der Linden, M. 1997. Socialisme ou barbarie: A French revolutionary group (1949-65). Left History, 5(1): 737.Google Scholar
Waters, F. & Woodcock, J. 2017. Far from Seamless: A Workers’ Inquiry at Deliveroo. Viewpoint Magazine, available at: Scholar
Wood, A. J., Lehdonvirta, V. & Graham, M. 2018. Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2): 95112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, J. 2014. The Workers’ Inquiry from Trotskyism to Operaismo: A Political Methodology for Investigating the Workplace. Ephemera, 14(3): 493513.Google Scholar
Woodcock, J. 2017. Working the Phones: Control and Resistance in Call Centres. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Woodcock, J. 2019. Marx at the Arcade: Consoles, Controllers, and Class Struggle. Chicago: Haymarket.Google Scholar
Woodcock, J. & Graham, M. 2019. The Gig Economy: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: PolityGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 2002. Storming Heaven: Class Composition and Struggle in Italian Autonomist Marxism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar


Aroles, J., Granter, E. & de Vaujany, F. X. 2020. Becoming mainstream: The professionalization and corporatization of digital nomadism. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(1): 114129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aroles, J., Mitev, N. & de Vaujany, F. X. 2019. Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3): 285299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. & Howcroft, D. 2014. Amazon Mechanical Turk and the commodification of labour. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(3): 213223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, T. 2018. The two rival concepts of devotional leisure: Towards an understanding of twenty-first century human creativity and the possibility of freedom. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 1(1): 7597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouncken, R. B. & Reuschl, A. J. 2018. Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1): 317334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. S. 1999. Thorstein Veblen in the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Issues, 33(4): 10351037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cant, C. 2019. Riding for Deliveroo: Resistance in the New Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. A., Duncan, T. & Thulemark, M. 2015. Lifestyle mobilities: The crossroads of travel, leisure and migration. Mobilities, 10(1): 155172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Gay, P. 1996. Consumption and Identity at Work. Milton Keynes: Sage.Google Scholar
Elgan, M. 2017. The Digital Nomad’s Guide to Working from Anywhere On Earth. Retrieved from Scholar
Ferriss, T. 2007. The 4-Hour Workweek: Escape 9-5, Live Anywhere, and Join the New Rich. New York: Harmony.Google Scholar
Hand, M. 2012. Ubiquitous Photography. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hillman, W. 2009. Veblen and the theory of the backpacker leisure class: Status seeking and emulation in the Australian contemporary tourist economy. Tourism Review International, 13: 157171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L. 2018. The Qualified Self: Social Media and the Accounting of Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latzko-Toth, G., Bonneau, C. & Millette, M. 2017. Small Data, Thick Data: Thickening Strategies for Trace-based Social Media Research. In Quan-Haase, A. & Sloan, L. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods. London: Sage, 199214.Google Scholar
Makimoto, T. & Manners, D. 1997. Digital Nomad. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
MBO Partners. 2018. A state of independence in American research brief. Digital Nomadism: A rising trend. Retrieved from Scholar
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldana, J. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Miller, D. & Sinanan, J. 2017. Visualising Facebook. London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moisander, J., Groß, C. & Eräranta, K. 2018. Mechanisms of biopower and neoliberal governmentality in precarious work: Mobilising the dependent self-employed as independent business owners. Human Relations, 71(3): 375398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, A. 2016. The digital nomad: Buzzword or research category? Transnational Social Review, 6(3): 344348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, C., Jarrahi, M. H., Sutherland, W. & Phillips, G. 2018. Digital nomads beyond the buzzword: Defining digital nomadic work and use of digital technologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science IConference 2018, (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prester, J., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. & Schlagwein, D. 2019. Becoming a Digital Nomad: Identity Emergence in the Flow of Practice. In International Conference on Information Systems, Munich, pp. 19.Google Scholar
Reichenberger, I. 2018. Digital nomads – a quest for holistic freedom in work and leisure. Annals of Leisure Research, 21(3): 364380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojek, C. 2000. Leisure and the rich today: Veblen’s thesis after a century. Leisure Studies, 19(1): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblat, A. 2018. Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. 2010. What would Veblen say? Leisure Sciences, 32(3): 288294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergi, V. & Bonneau, C. 2016. Making mundane work visible on social media: A CCO investigation of working out loud on Twitter. Communication Research and Practice, 2(3): 378406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, M. 1981. Lifestyle and Social Structure: Concepts, Definitions and Analyses. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spinuzzi, C. 2012. Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4): 399441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, B. Y. 2019. The digital nomad lifestyle: (Remote) work/leisure balance, privilege, and constructed community. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 2(1–2): 2742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallas, S. P. & Cummins, E. R. 2015. Personal branding and identity norms in the popular business press: Enterprise culture in an age of precarity. Organization Studies, 36(3): 293319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, T. 2009. The Theory of the Leisure Class, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats