Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-54jdg Total loading time: 0.288 Render date: 2022-08-15T00:37:42.559Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

3 - The Charter, the ECJ and national courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Diamond Ashiagbor
Affiliation:
University of London
Nicola Countouris
Affiliation:
University College London
Ioannis Lianos
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

It is axiomatic that national courts must apply EU law when construing national legislation. This has always included the primary Treaty, EU legislation made thereunder and general principles of EU law fashioned by the Community courts. The ratification of the Lisbon Treaty now poses new challenges for national courts when interpreting EU and national legislation, because it rendered the Charter of Fundamental Rights legally binding, thereby resolving an issue that had been left open since the Charter was initially drafted almost a decade earlier. The Lisbon Treaty in addition imposed an obligation on the EU to join the ECHR, thereby resolving another issue that had been on the agenda for even longer.

This chapter addresses some of the legal issues raised by this development, more especially those that are relevant to national courts in the overall scheme of the Charter. The chapter begins with a brief overview of the EU's fundamental rights’ jurisprudence and the genesis of the Charter. This is followed by analysis of the Protocol that limits the application of the Charter in the United Kingdom and Poland. The discussion then turns to the ambit of the Charter and the extent to which it applies to Member State action. The ensuing sections address the divide between rights and principles contained in the Charter and the relationship between the ECHR and the Charter. The chapter concludes with reflections on the more general impact of the Charter on judicial review and the role of the ECJ.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Craig, PThe Lisbon Treaty, Law, Politics and Treaty ReformOxford University Press 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauses, M 1985
Cassese, AClapham, AWeiler, JEuropean Union: The Human Rights ChallengeNomos 1991Google Scholar
Clapham, A 1990
Lenaerts, K 1991
Weiler, J 1992
Coppel, JO’Neill, A 1992
de Búrca, G 1993
Twomey, PThe European Union: Three Pillars without a Human Rights Foundation’Legal Issues of the Maastricht TreatyWiley 1994Google Scholar
Weiler, JLockhart, N 1995
O’Leary, S 1995
Neuwahl, NRosas, AThe European Union and Human RightsKluwer 1995Google Scholar
Alston, PThe EU and Human RightsOxford University Press 1999Google Scholar
1959
1960
1965
1970
1974
1979
2001
2003
2003
1986
1989
1991
1997
2002
2004
1997
1997
Búrca, G deThe Role of Equality in European Community Law’The Principle of Equal Treatment in EC LawSweet & Maxwell 1997Google Scholar
Vitorino, AThe Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Foundation for the Area of Freedom, Justice and SecurityCentre for European Legal Studies, Exeter Paper in European Law 2001Google Scholar
Weiler, J 2000
Rochere, J Dutheil de la 2001
Búrca, G deThe Drafting of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights’ 2001 26 ELRevGoogle Scholar
Maduro, MThe Double Constitutional Life of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Legal PerspectiveHart 2003Google Scholar
Búrca, G deBeatrix Aschenbrenner, JEuropean Constitutionalism and the Charter’The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Politics, Law and PolicyHart 2004Google Scholar
Schonlau, JDrafting the EU Charter, Rights, Legitimacy and ProcessPalgrave 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, CThe “Opt-Out” for the UK and Poland from the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Triumph of Rhetoric over RealityThe Lisbon Treaty, EU Constitutionalism without a Constitutional TreatySpringer 2008Google Scholar
Craig, PBúrca, G deEU Law, Text, Cases and MaterialsOxford University Press 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, M 1998
Clapham, AHuman Rights in the Private SphereOxford University Press 1993Google Scholar
Alston, PNon-State Actors and Human RightsOxford University Press 2005Google Scholar
Markesinis, BPrivacy, Freedom of Expression and the Horizontal Effect of the Human Rights Bill: Lessons from Germany’ 1998 114 LQRGoogle Scholar
Young, A 2002
Phillipson, GThe Human Rights Act, ‘Horizontal Effect’ and the Common Law: A Bang or a Whimper’ 1999 62 MLRCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, PEU Administrative LawOxford University Press 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besselink, LThe Member States, the National Constitutions and the Scope of the Charter’ 2001 8 MJGoogle Scholar
Schwarze, JA German View on the European Charter of Fundamental Rights: Effect on theBundesverfassungsgericht 2001 3Google Scholar
Garcia, R AlonsoThe General Provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights’ 2002 8 ELJ495Google Scholar
Eeckhout, PThe EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Federal Question’ 2002 39 CMLRevGoogle Scholar
2002
2000
2002
Alston, PMonitoring Fundamental Rights in the EU, The Contribution of the Fundamental Rights AgencyHart 2005 161Google Scholar
Mowbray, AThe Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human RightsHart 2004Google Scholar
Fredman, SHuman Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive DutiesOxford University Press 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979
1982
2002
2003
2000
2004
2002
Craig, PEU Administrative LawOxford University Press 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995
Dworkin, RLaw's EmpireFontana 1986Google Scholar
Dworkin, RFreedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American ConstitutionOxford University Press 1996Google Scholar
Waldron, JLaw and DisagreementOxford University Press 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, JThe Core Case against Judicial Review 2006 115 Yale LJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, RPolitical Constitutionalism, A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of DemocracyCambridge University Press 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×