Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:56:12.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Nicholas Allen
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Sarah Birch
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics and Integrity in British Politics
How Citizens Judge their Politicians' Conduct and Why it Matters
, pp. 217 - 231
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 2000. ‘The new separation of powers’, Harvard Law Review 13(3): 633–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adonis, Andrew. 1997. ‘The UK: civic virtue put to the test’, in della Porta, Donatella and Mény, Yves (eds), Democracy and Corruption in Europe. London: Pinter, pp. 103–17.Google Scholar
Alatas, Syed Hussein. 1990. Corruption: Its Nature, Causes and Functions. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Allen, Nicholas. 2008. ‘A new ethical world of MPs?Journal of Legislative Studies 14(3): 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Nicholas. 2011. ‘Dishonourable members? Exploring patterns of misconduct in the contemporary House of Commons’, British Politics 6(2): 210–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Nicholas and Birch, Sarah. 2011. ‘Political conduct and misconduct: probing public opinion’, Parliamentary Affairs 64(1): 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Nicholas and Birch, Sarah. 2012. ‘On either side of a moat? Elite and mass attitudes towards right and wrong’, European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Nicholas and Birch, Sarah. Forthcoming. ‘After the 2009 expenses scandal: British process evaluations in context’, Political Studies.
Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Brehm, John. 2002. Hard Choices, Easy Answers: Values, Information, and American Public Opinion. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher. 1995. Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. and Tverdova, Yuliya V.. 2003. ‘Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies’, American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anechiarico, Frank and Jacobs, James B.. 1996. The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ariely, Dan. 2012. The (Honest) Truth about Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone – Especially Ourselves. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Michael M. and Bierling, Gerald. 2005. ‘Politicians, the public and political ethics: worlds apart’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 38(4): 1003–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Michael M. and Mancuso, Maureen. 1992. ‘Edicts and etiquette: regulating conflict of interest in Congress and the House of Commons’, Corruption and Reform 7(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Baker, Amy. 2000. Prime Ministers and the Rule Book. London: Politicos.Google Scholar
Barnett, Steven. 2002. ‘Will a crisis in journalism provoke a crisis in democracy?Political Quarterly 73(4): 400–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartle, John, Dellepiane-Avellaneda, Sebastian and Stimson, James. 2011. ‘The moving centre: preferences for government activity in Britain, 1950–2005’, British Journal of Political Science 41(2): 259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basler, Roy P., Pratt, Marion Dolores and Dunlap, Lloyd A. (eds). 1953. The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, 9 vols. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, vol. I.Google Scholar
Beard, Edmund and Horn, Stephen. 1975. Congressional Ethics: The View from the House. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. 1965. Modern British Politics: A Study of Parties and Pressure Groups. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Behnke, Nathalie. 2002. ‘A Nolan Committee for the German ethics infrastructure?European Journal of Political Research 41(5): 675–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance and Iyengar, Shanto. 2008. ‘A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication’, Journal of Communication 58(4): 707–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, A. H. 1964. Representative and Responsible Government: An Essay on the British Constitution. London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2010. ‘Perceptions of electoral fairness and voter turnout’, Comparative Political Studies 43(12): 1601–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, Sarah and Allen, Nicholas. 2012. ‘“There will be burning and a-looting tonight”: the social and political correlates of law-breaking’, Political Quarterly 83(1): 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Tony. 2007. ‘Tony Blair’s “Media” speech: the prime minister’s Reuters speech on public life’, Political Quarterly 78(4): 476–87.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Everitt, Joanna, Fournier, Patrick, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Nevitte, Neil. 2005. ‘The political psychology of voters’ reactions to a corruption scandal’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
Bowler, Shaun and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2004. ‘Politicians, scandals, and trust in government’, Political Behavior 26(3): 271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, Heinz and Johns, Robert. Forthcoming. ‘The declining representativeness of the British party system, and why it matters’, Political Studies.
Butt, Sarah and Curtice, John. 2010. ‘Duty in decline? Trends in attitudes to voting’, in Park, Alison, Curtice, John, Thomson, Katarina, Phillips, Miranda, Clery, Elizabeth and Butt, Sarah (eds), British Social Attitudes: The 26th Report. London: Sage, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Calvert, Jonathan, Newell, Claire and Gillard, Michael. 2009. ‘Revealed: Labour lords change laws for cash’, Sunday Times, 25 January.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chang, Eric C. C. and Chu, Yun-han. 2006. ‘Corruption and trust: exceptionalism in Asian democracies?Journal of Politics 68(2): 259–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chibnall, Steven and Saunders, Peter. 1977. ‘Worlds apart: notes on the social reality of corruption’, British Journal of Sociology 28(2): 138–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack. 1974. ‘The political relevance of trust in government’, American Political Science Review 68(3): 973–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D. and Alcock, Alan C.. 1989. ‘National elections and political attitudes: the case of political efficacy’, British Journal of Political Science 19(4): 551–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne and Whiteley, Paul. 2009. Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne and Whiteley, Paul. 2011. ‘Valence politics and electoral choice in Britain, 2010’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21(2): 237–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 1995. First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Cm 2850-I. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 1998. Fifth Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life: The Funding of Political Parties in the United Kingdom, Cm 4057-I. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2000. Sixth Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life: Reinforcing Standards, Cm 4557-I. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2004. Survey of Public Attitudes towards Conduct in Public Life. London: BMRB Social Research.Google Scholar
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2008. Survey of Public Attitudes towards Conduct in Public Life 2008. London: BMRB Social Research.Google Scholar
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2011. Survey of Public Attitudes towards Conduct in Public Life 2010. London: Committee on Standards in Public Life.Google Scholar
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2013. Fourteenth Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life: Standards Matter: A Review of Best Practice in Promoting Good Behaviour in Public Life, Cm 8519. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1995. ‘Foreword’, in Petty, Richard E. and Krosnick, Jon A. (eds), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. xi–xvi.Google Scholar
Cowley, Philip. 2012. ‘Arise, novice leader! The continuing rise of the career politician in Britain’, Politics 32(1): 31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtice, John, Fisher, Stephen and Ford, Robert. 2010. ‘Appendix II: Analysis of the results’, in Kavanagh, Dennis and Cowley, Philip (eds), The British General Election of 2010. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 385–426.Google Scholar
Curtice, John and Heath, Oliver. 2012. ‘Does choice deliver? Public satisfaction with the health service’, Political Studies 60(3): 484–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Charles L., Ai Camp, Roderic and Coleman, Kenneth M.. 2004. ‘The influence of party systems on citizens’ perceptions of corruption and electoral response in Latin America’, Comparative Political Studies 37(6): 677–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Porta, Donatella. 2000. ‘Social capital, beliefs in government, and political corruption’, in Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D. (eds), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton University Press, pp. 202–28.Google Scholar
Drewry, Gavin and Oliver, Dawn. 2004. ‘Parliament and the law relating to parliamentary standards’, in Gay, Oonagh and Leopold, Patricia (eds), Conduct Unbecoming: The Regulation of Parliamentary Behaviour. London: Politicos, pp. 181–212.Google Scholar
Doig, Alan. 1984. Corruption and Misconduct in Contemporary British Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Doig, Alan. 1996. ‘From Lynskey to Nolan: the corruption of British politics and public service?Journal of Law and Society 23(1): 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doig, Alan 2005. ‘Sleaze and trust: Labour trades mistrust for sleaze’, Parliamentary Affairs 58(2): 394–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doig, Alan 2006. ‘Regional variations: organisational and procedural dimensions of public ethics delivery ten years after Nolan’, Parliamentary Affairs 59(3): 458–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, McKeown, Bruce and Carlson, James M.. 1988. ‘Popular conceptions of political corruption: implications for the empirical study of political ethics’, Corruption and Reform 3(1): 3–24.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Easton, David 1975. ‘A re-assessment of the concept of political support’, British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 437–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, Andrew C. and Fisher, Alexander. 2011. ‘Electoral accountability and the UK parliamentary expenses scandal: did voters punish corrupt MPs?’ Political Science and Political Economy Working Paper, No. 8/2011, Department of Government, London School of Economics.
Eggers, Andrew C. and Hainmueller, Jens. 2009. ‘MPs for sale? Returns to office in postwar British politics’, American Political Science Review 103(4): 513–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B. and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ezrow, Lawrence and Xezonakis, Georgios. 2011. ‘Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings’, Comparative Political Studies 44(9): 1152–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fackler, Tim and Lin, Tse-min. 1995. ‘Political corruption and presidential elections, 1929–1992’, Journal of Politics 57(4): 971–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1985. ‘Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: a panel analysis’, American Journal of Political Science 29(4): 891–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Justin. 2009. ‘Hayden Phillips and Jack Straw: The continuation of British exceptionalism in party finance?Parliamentary Affairs 62(2): 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Justin, Van Heerde, Jennifer and Tucker, Andrew. 2010. ‘Does one trust judgement fit all? Linking theory and empirics’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 12(2): 161–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, Matthew. 2012. Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, Matthew and Kelso, Alexandra. 2011. ‘Mind the gap: political analysis, public expectations and the parliamentary decline thesis’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 13(2): 249–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Bob. 1997. Newszak and News Media. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Frohlich, Norman and Oppenheimer, Joe. 2000. ‘How people reason about ethics’, in Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Popkin, Samuel L. (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. and Modigliani, Andre. 1989. ‘Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach’, American Journal of Sociology 95(1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Oonagh and Leopold, Patricia (eds). 2004. Conduct Unbecoming: The Regulation of Parliamentary Behaviour. London: Politicos.Google Scholar
Getz, Robert S. 1966. Congressional Ethics: The Conflict of Interest Issue. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Gibbs, John C. and Schnell, Steven V.. 1985. ‘Moral development “versus” socialization: a critique’, American Psychologist 40(10): 1071–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin and Shefter, Martin. 1990. Politics by Other Means: The Declining Importance of Elections in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
GRECO. 2001. First Evaluation Round: Evaluation Report on the United Kingdom. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D. and Haidt, Jonathan. 2002. ‘How (and where) does moral judgment work?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(12): 517–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, Joshua D., Sommerville, R. Brian, Nystrom, Leigh E., Darley, John M. and Cohen, Jonathan D.. 2001. ‘An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment’, Science 293: 2105–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grødeland, Åse B., Miller, William L. and Koshechkina, Tatyana Y.. 2000. ‘The ethnic dimension to bureaucratic encounters in postcommunist Europe: perceptions and experience’, Nations and Nationalism 6(1): 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart (ed.). 1978. Public and Private Morality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Heath, Oliver. 2011. ‘The great divide: voters, parties, MPs and expenses’, in Allen, Nicholas and Bartle, John (eds), Britain at the Polls 2010. London: Sage, pp. 120–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J. (ed.) 1970. ‘The context of analysis: introduction’, Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Herrick, Rebekah. 2003. Fashioning the More Ethical Representative: The Impact of Ethics Reforms in the US House of Representatives. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 2005. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2001. ‘Process preferences and American politics: what the people want government to be’, American Political Science Review 95(1): 145–53.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Irving, Clive, Hall, Ron and Wallington, Jeremy. 1963. Scandal ’63: A Study of the Profumo Affair. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Jackson, Michael and Smith, Rodney. 1996. ‘Inside moves and outside views: an Australian case study of elite and public perceptions of political corruption’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 9(1): 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Oliver. 2009. ‘Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(1): 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Bruce. 1985. ‘Legislative ethics and moral minimalism’, in Jennings, Bruce and Callahan, Daniel (eds), Representation and Responsibility: Exploring Legislative Ethics. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 149–65.Google Scholar
John, Peter, Smith, Graham and Stoker, Gerry. 2009. ‘Nudge nudge, think think: two strategies for changing civic behaviour’, Political Quarterly 80(3): 361–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Michael. 1986. ‘Right and wrong in American politics: popular conceptions of corruption’, Polity 18(3): 367–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Michael. 1991. ‘Right and wrong in British politics: “fits of morality” in comparative perspective’, Polity 24(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Philip and Hudson, John. 2000. ‘Civic duty and expressive voting: is virtue its own reward?Kyklos 53(1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A. and Banducci, Susan A.. 2008. ‘Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: how electoral systems shape political behaviour’, British Journal of Political Science 38(2): 311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kaye, Robert P. 2005. ‘Reluctant innovators: regulating conflict of interest within Washington and Westminster’, in Black, Julia, Lodge, Martin and Thatcher, Mark (eds), Regulatory Innovation: A Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Kellner, Peter. 2004. ‘Britain’s culture of detachment’, Parliamentary Affairs 57(4): 830–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, Alexandra. 2007. ‘Parliament and political disengagement: neither waving nor drowning’, Political Quarterly 78(3): 364–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Michael. 2009. ‘Taking the temperature of the British political elite 3: when grubby is the order of the day …’, Parliamentary Affairs 62(3): 503–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony. 1981. ‘The rise of the career politician in Britain – and its consequences’, British Journal of Political Science 11(3): 249–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony. 1986. ‘Sex, money, and power’, in Hodder-Williams, Richard and Caeser, James (eds), Politics in Britain and the United States: Comparative Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 173–222.Google Scholar
King, Anthony. (ed.). 2002. ‘Tony Blair’s first term’, Britain at the Polls 2001. New York: Chatham House, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
King, Anthony. 2007. The British Constitution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, Anthony. 2009. ‘MPs’ expenses: where do they go from here?’ Daily Telegraph, 11 May.
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1984. The Psychology of Moral Development, vol. II: Essays on Moral Development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Koutsoukis, Kleomenis S. 2006. ‘Political scandals and crisis management in Greece, 1821–2001’, in Garrad, John and Newell, James L. (eds), Scandals in Past and Contemporary Politics. Manchester University Press, pp. 123–36.Google Scholar
Krebs, Dennis L. and Denton, Kathy. 2005. ‘Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: a critical evaluation of Kohlberg’s model’, Psychological Review 112(3): 629–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James H. and Quirk, Paul J.. 1998. ‘Reconsidering the rational public: cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion’, in Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., and Popkin, S. L. (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–82.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H. and Quirk, Paul J.. 2000. ‘Reconsidering the rational public: cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion’, in Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Popkin, Samuel L. (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumlin, Staffan and Esaiasson, Peter. 2012. ‘Scandal fatigue? Scandal elections and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe, 1977–2007’, British Journal of Political Science 42(2): 263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. ‘The case for motivated reasoning’, Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lascoumes, Pierre (ed.). 2010. Favoritisme et corruption à la française. Petits arrangements avec la probité. Paris: Presses Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Laswell, Harold. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, and How?New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Leach, Robert. 2009. Political Ideology in Britain, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret and Stoker, Laura. 2000. ‘Political trust and trustworthiness’, Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Matthew D., Schneider, Darren and Oschner, Kevin N.. 2003. ‘Is political cognition like riding a bicycle? How cognitive neuroscience can inform research on political thinking’, Political Psychology 24(4): 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linde, Jonas and Ekman, Joakim. 2003. ‘Satisfaction with democracy: a note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics’, European Journal of Political Research 42(3): 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Listhaug, Ola. 1995. ‘The dynamics of trust in politicians’, in Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Fuchs, Dieter (eds), Citizens and the State. Oxford University Press, pp. 261–97.Google Scholar
Little, Richard and Wickham-Jones, Mark (eds). 2000. New Labour’s Foreign Policy: A New Moral Crusade?Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, John. 2004. What the Media are Doing to Our Politics. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton and Taber, Charles S.. 2000. ‘Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning’, in Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Popkin, Samuel L. (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowell, A. Lawrence. 1908. The Government of England, 2 vols. New York: Macmillan, vol. II.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, G. Calvin, with Hafken, Michael. 2002. Scandal Proof: Do Ethics Laws make Government Ethical?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Maureen. 1995. The Ethical World of British MPs. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Maureen, Atkinson, Michael M., Blais, André, Greene, Ian and Nevitte, Neil. 1998. A Question of Ethics: Canadians Speak Out. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell and Mackuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Margetts, Helen and Stoker, Gerry. 2010. ‘The experimental method: prospects for laboratory and field experiments’, Marsh, David and Stoker, Gerry (eds), Theory and Methods in Political Science, 3rd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 308–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquand, David. 2008. Britain since 1918: The Strange Career of British Democracy. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian. 2000. ‘Keeping them honest: public and elite perceptions of ethical conduct among Australian legislators’, Political Studies 48(1): 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, James A. and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. ‘Political corruption and ethical judgements of American citizens: are government officials held to a higher standard?’ paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
McDonald, Michael D., Mendes, Silvia M. and Budge, Ian. 2004. ‘What are elections for? Conferring the median mandate’, British Journal of Political Science 34(1): 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus-Czubińska, Clare, Miller, William L., Markowski, Radosław and Wasilewski, Jacek. 2004. ‘Why is corruption in Poland “a serious cause for concern”?Crime, Law and Social Change 41(2): 107–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H. 1974. ‘Political issues and trust in government’, American Political Science Review 68(3): 951–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, William L., Grødeland, Åse B. and Koshechkina, Tatyana Y.. 2001. A Culture of Corruption? Coping with Government in Post-Communist Europe. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Naurin, Elin. 2011. Promising Democracy: Parties, Citizens and Election Promises. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E. and Kinder, Donald R.. 1996. ‘Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion’, Journal of Politics 58(4): 1055–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, James L. 2008. ‘Ethical conduct and perceptions of public probity in Britain: the story so far’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9(1): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Kenneth. 1999. ‘Mass media effects: mobilization or media malaise?British Journal of Political Science 29(4): 577–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Kenneth. 2006. ‘May the weak force be with you: the power of the mass media in modern politics’, European Journal of Political Research 45(2): 209–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa (ed.). 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Participation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Philip. 1998. ‘The Conservative Party: “in office but not in power”’, in King, Anthony (ed.), New Labour Triumphs: Britain at the Polls. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, pp. 75–112.Google Scholar
Norton, Philip and Wood, David M.. 1993. Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and their Constituents. Lexington, KT: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
O’Leary, Cornelius. 1962. The Elimination of Corrupt Practices in British Elections 1868–1911. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. 2002. A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oborne, Peter. 2005. The Rise of Political Lying. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Oborne, Peter. 2007. The Triumph of the Political Class. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Oliver, Dawn. 1997. ‘Regulating the conduct of MPs: the British experience of combating corruption’, Political Studies 45(3): 539–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paldam, Martin. 1986. ‘The distribution of election results and the two explanations of the cost of ruling’, European Journal of Political Economy 2(1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Suzanne L. and Parker, Glenn R.. 1993. ‘Why do we trust our congressman?Journal of Politics 55(2): 442–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles and Johnston, Ron. 2012. ‘The electoral impact of the UK 2009 MPs’ expenses scandal’, Political Studies 60(4): 730–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles, Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul. 2004. Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peele, Gillian and Kaye, Robert. 2008. ‘Conflict of interest in British public life’, in Trost, Christine and Gash, Alison L. (eds), Conflict of Interest in Public Life: Cross National Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Roswell B. 1963. ‘The new federal conflict of interest law’, Harvard Law Review 76(6): 1113–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, John G. and Welch, Susan. 1978. ‘Political corruption in America: a search for definitions and a theory, or if political corruption is in the mainstream of American politics why is it not in the mainstream of American politics research?American Political Science Review 72(3): 974–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, John G. and Welch, Susan. 1980. ‘Effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in congressional elections’, American Political Science Review 74(3): 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pharr, Susan J. 2000. ‘Officials’ misconduct and public distrust: Japan and the trilateral democracies’, in Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D. (eds), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton University Press, pp. 173–201.Google Scholar
Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D. (eds). 2000. Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Philp, Mark. 2007. Political Conduct. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, D. C. M. 1961. ‘The commercial and industrial interests of Ministers of the Crown’, Political Studies 9(3): 267–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Jr., G. Bingham. 1986. ‘American voter turnout in comparative perspective’, American Political Science Review 80(1): 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Jr., G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Jr., G. Bingham and Vanberg, Georg S.. 2000. ‘Election laws, disproportionality and median correspondence: implications for two visions of democracy’, British Journal of Political Science 30(3): 383–411.Google Scholar
Prince, Rosa. 2009. ‘MP Nigel Griffiths faces sleaze inquiry over sex shame’, Daily Telegraph, 23 March.
Prior, Markus.2010. ‘You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle’, Journal of Politics 72(3): 747–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Administration Committee. 2007. Fourth Report: Ethics and Standards: The Regulation of Conduct in Public Life, HC 121-I, 2006–07. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, David P. and McCann, James A.. 2005. ‘Popular interpretations of “corruption” and their partisan consequences’, Political Behavior 27(3): 261–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddell, Peter. 1993. Honest Opportunism: The Rise of the Career Politician. London: Hamilton.Google Scholar
Riddell, Peter. 2011. In Defence of Politicians: In Spite of Themselves. London: Biteback.Google Scholar
Riddell, Peter. 2013. The Report of the Triennial Review of the Committee on Standards in Public Life. London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Ridley, F. F. and Doig, Alan (eds). 1995. Sleaze: Politicians, Private Interests and Public Reaction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Bob. 2009. ‘Jacqui Smith’s fury at her husband’s porn viewing on expenses’, Daily Mirror, 30 March.
Robinton, Madeline R. 1970. ‘The British method of dealing with political corruption’, Heidenheimer, Arnold J. (ed.), Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 249–58.Google Scholar
Roodhouse, Mark. 2002. ‘The 1948 Belcher Affair and Lynskey Tribunal’, Twentieth Century British History 13(4): 384–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard. 1984. Do Parties Make a Difference?London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard and Mishler, William. 2010. ‘Experience versus perception of corruption: Russia as a test case’, Global Crime 11(2): 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William and Haerpfer, Christian. 1998. Democracy and its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1996. Drawing the Line: Legislative Ethics in the States. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo and Uslaner, Eric M.. 2005. ‘All for all: equality, corruption, and social trust’, World Politics 58(4): 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royed, Terry J. 1996. ‘Testing the mandate model in Britain and the United States: evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher eras’, British Journal of Political Science 26(1): 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundquist, Barry S., Strom, Gerald S. and Peters, John G.. 1977. ‘Corrupt politicians and their electoral support: some experimental observations’, American Political Science Review 71(3): 954–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, Michael and Giddings, Philip. 2011. Parliamentary Socialisation: Learning the Ropes or Determining Behaviour?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabato, Larry. 1991. Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism has Transformed American Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Saint-Martin, Denis. 2006. ‘Path dependence and self-reinforcing processes’, in Saint-Martin, Denis and Thompson, Fred (eds), Public Ethics and Governance: Standards and Practices in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: JAI Press, pp. 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, David, Clarke, Harold D., Stewart, Mariane C. and Whiteley, Paul. 2007. ‘Does mode matter for modeling political choice? Evidence from the 2005 British Election Study’, Political Analysis 15(3): 257–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 2nd edn. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1982. ‘Rules of the game in Britain: can the politicians be trusted?American Political Science Review 76(2): 239–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1994. Westminster’s World: Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, G. R. 1987. Corruption in British Politics 1895–1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. 2001. ‘The role of affect in symbolic politics’, in Kuklinski, James H. (ed.), Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 2002. ‘The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: a comparative study of four Latin American countries’, Journal of Politics 64(2): 408–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm. 1990. ‘Members of Parliament’, in Rush, Michael (ed.), Parliament and Pressure Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 85–116.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter (ed.). 1994. Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spigelman, James J. 2004. ‘The integrity branch of government’, Australian Law Journal 78(11): 724–37.Google Scholar
Stanlis, Peter J. (ed.). 1963. Edmund Burke: Selected Writings and Speeches. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Stark, Andrew. 2000. Conflict of Interest in American Public Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. 2006. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. 2011. ‘Anti-politics in Britain’, in Heffernan, Richard, Cowley, Philip and Hay, Colin (eds), Developments in British Politics 9. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 152–73.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald. 1963. ‘Spatial models of party competition’, American Political Science Review 57(2): 368–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. and Sunstein, Cass R.. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 1995. Ethics in Congress: From Individual to Institutional Corruption. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahnemann, Daniel (eds). 2000. Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Twyman, Joe. 2008. ‘Getting it right: YouGov and online survey research in Britain’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18(4): 343–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vavreck, Lynn and Rivers, Douglas. 2008. ‘The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18(4): 355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. 2007. ‘Moral psychology’, in Jackson, Frank and Smith, Michael (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford University Press, pp. 89–113.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1973. ‘Political action: the problem of dirty hands’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 2(2): 160–80.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. (ed.). 1999. Democracy and Trust. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2004. ‘What does corruption mean in a democracy?American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 328–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2006. ‘Democracy and deceit: regulating appearances of corruption’, American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 164–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Nicholas. 2009. ‘Employment minister faces inquiry call over £60,000 second-home allowance’, The Guardian, 23 March.
Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1992. ‘Measuring political legitimacy’, American Political Science Review 86(1): 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan and Peters, John G.. 1977. ‘Attitudes of US state legislators toward political corruption: some preliminary findings’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 2(4): 445–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul, Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David and Stewart, Marianne. 2013. ‘Why do voters lose trust in governments? Public perceptions of government honesty and trustworthiness 1997–2013’, paper presented at a special one-day conference on ‘Citizens and Politics in Britain Today: Still a Civic Culture?’, London School of Economics, London, 26 September.
Williams, Sandra. 1985. Conflict of Interest: The Ethical Dilemma in Politics. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Winnett, Robert and Raynor, Gordon. 2009. No Expenses Spared. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
Wroe, Andrew, Allen, Nicholas and Birch, Sarah. 2013. ‘The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption’, European Political Science Review 5(2): 175–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, Jong-sung and Khagram, Sanjeev. 2005. ‘A comparative study of inequality and corruption’, American Sociological Review 70(1): 136–57.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1998. ‘Monica Lewinsky’s contribution to political science’, PS: Political Science and Politics 31(2): 182–9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Nicholas Allen, Royal Holloway, University of London, Sarah Birch, University of Glasgow
  • Book: Ethics and Integrity in British Politics
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279568.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Nicholas Allen, Royal Holloway, University of London, Sarah Birch, University of Glasgow
  • Book: Ethics and Integrity in British Politics
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279568.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Nicholas Allen, Royal Holloway, University of London, Sarah Birch, University of Glasgow
  • Book: Ethics and Integrity in British Politics
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279568.012
Available formats
×