Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T21:37:19.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Ecosystem services: from concept to practice

from Part I - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Jetske A. Bouma
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam
Pieter J. H. van Beukering
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam
Jetske A. Bouma
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
Pieter J. H. van Beukering
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Ecosystem services are hot, and they have been hot for a while. In 1998, Costanza et al. published their famous article about the societal value produced by ecosystems through ecosystem service delivery, an article which at the time this introduction was written had been cited more than 10 000 times. In 2005, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) framed the need to protect biodiversity and the world’s ecosystems in terms of ecosystem services (MEA, 2005). In 2009, “The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity” (TEEB) followed up by presenting an approach to help decision-makers recognize, demonstrate, and capture the values of ecosystem services and biodiversity. And by now, most (inter)national policies in the field of nature conservation refer to ecosystem services when explaining the need for nature conservation, biodiversity protection, and sustainable resource use.

Despite the popularity of the concept of ecosystem services, policy-makers and practitioners are struggling to implement the concept in practice. An important reason for this science–policy divide is the lack of an interdisciplinary framework that guides policy-makers through the definition and measurement of ecosystem services to their valuation and the translation of these values into effective policy instruments and governance arrangements (see also Daily et al., 2009).

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecosystem Services
From Concept to Practice
, pp. 3 - 22
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleton, A. F. (2002). How New York City used an ecosystem services strategy carried out through an urban-rural partnership to preserve the pristine quality of its drinking water and save billions of dollars. Paper presented at Forest Trends, Tokyo. November 2002, p. 11.
Cernea, M. M. and Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2006). Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World Development, 34(10): 1808–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbera, E., Kosoy, N., and Martinez-Tuna, M. (2007). Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4): 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., et al. (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1): 315.Google Scholar
Daily, G., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., et al. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision-making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(10): 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferwerda, W. (2012). Nature resilience: ecological restoration by partners in business for the next generations. Report, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
Fisher, B. and Cristopher, T. (2007). Poverty and biodiversity: measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots. Ecological Economics, 62: 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B., Turner, K., and Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision-making. Ecological Economics, 68: 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitter, A. H. (2013). Are ecosystem services replaceable by technology?Environmental and Resource Economics, 55: 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., et al. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309: 570–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Baggethun, E. and Ruiz-Perez, L. (2011). Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography, 35(5): 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, K. (2006). Where is the Wealth of Nations? Measuring Capital for the 21st Century. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968).The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859): 1243–1248.Google ScholarPubMed
Kahn, J. R. (2005). Economic Approach to Environmental and Natural Resources (3rd edition). Nashville, TN: South-Western Publishers.Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak vs. Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Norgaard, R. (2010). Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 69: 1219–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey Benayas, J. R., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A., and Bullock, J. M. (2009). Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science, 325: 1121–1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461: 472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TEEB (2009). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy-makers. Available at: .
UN General Assembly (2010). High-level meeting of the general assembly as a contribution to the international year of biodiversity, A/64/865, United Nations General Assembly, Geneva.
Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69:1245–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×