Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-07T01:48:07.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - International political economy approaches to international institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Jagdeep S. Bhandari
Affiliation:
Southern Methodist University, Texas
Alan O. Sykes
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

International institutions are once again at the center of the substantive and intellectual agendas of international politics. Practitioners are asking tough questions about reformulating existing institutions such as NATO or the United Nations and its agencies; old institutions like the GATT are being transformed into new ones like the WTO; and completely new institutions like NAFTA, APEC, and LRTAP are being created. At the same time, the relevance and importance of international institutions have returned to the center of intellectual debate for the first time in a generation. Realists are renewing their claims that institutions are irrelevant or else derivative of more fundamental issues of power politics; liberals are renewing claims about the central role of institutions in the governance of existing and prospective international issues.

This debate over the importance of international institutions has multiple causes, practical and intellectual. The end of the cold war reopened a set of institutional issues that had been frozen in the bipolar division of international politics and created possibilities for reorganizing our international security and economic affairs. In addition, changes in technology and interdependence have resulted in new issues such as the global environment and increased the significance of long-standing issues such as trade. While these substantive concerns have made the intellectual debate more important, its origin lies equally in the social science-wide return to institutional analysis. Some three decades after an earlier descriptive institutionalism was overthrown by a move toward behavioralism, the social sciences are recapturing an analysis of institutions that had been significantly neglected in the meantime.

Type
Chapter
Information
Economic Dimensions in International Law
Comparative and Empirical Perspectives
, pp. 477 - 512
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×