Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-vl2kb Total loading time: 1.041 Render date: 2021-11-29T18:01:11.254Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

4 - Tree Holes and Hole-Nesting Birds in European and North American Forests

from Part I - Forest Birds and Their Adaptations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2018

Grzegorz Mikusiński
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Jean-Michel Roberge
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Robert J. Fuller
Affiliation:
British Trust for Ornithology, Norfolk
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamík, P. & Král, M. (2008) Nest losses of cavity nesting birds caused by dormice (Gliridae, Rodentia). Acta Theriologica, 53, 185192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, K.E.H. & Martin, K. (2004) Nest cavity availability and selection in aspen-conifer groves in a grassland landscape. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 20992109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, K.E.H. & Martin, K. (2007) The importance of excavators in hole-nesting communities: Availability and use of natural tree holes in old mixed forests of western Canada. Journal of Ornithology, 148 (Suppl. 2), 425434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, K.E.H. & Martin, K. (2008) Resource selection plasticity and community responses to experimental reduction of a critical resource. Ecology, 89, 971980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, K.E.H. & Martin, K. (2012) Experimental test of nest-site limitation in mature mixed forests of central British Columbia. Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 557565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, K.E.H., Wiebe, K.L. & Martin, K. (2002) Nest-site reuse patterns for a cavity-nesting bird community in interior British Columbia. Auk, 119, 391402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alatalo, R., Carlson, A. & Lundberg, A. (1990) Polygyny and breeding success of Pied Flycatchers nesting in natural cavities. In Population Biology of Passerine Birds. Blondel, J., Gosler, A., Lebreton, J.D. & McCleery, R. (eds.). Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 323330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albano, D.J. (1992) Nesting mortality of Carolina Chickadees breeding in natural cavities. Condor, 94, 371382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, J., Domingo Gómez, E., Michon, S. & Roberge, J.-M. (2017) Tree cavity densities and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2017.1360389.Google Scholar
Askins, R.A. (2014) Saving the World’s Deciduous Forests. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bavrlic, K. (2008) The effects of partial harvesting on cavity-nesting birds in the Carolinian forests of southwestern Ontario: Habitat responses and species interactions. MSc Thesis, Trent University, Ontario. 222 pp.Google Scholar
Belles-Isles, J.C. & Picman, J. (1986) House Wren nest-destroying behaviour. Condor, 88, 190193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, L. & Martin, K. (2012) Identifying suitable woodpecker nest trees using decay selection profiles in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides). Forest Ecology and Management, 286, 192202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, L.A. & Walters, J.R. (2008a) Cavity-nest webs in a longleaf pine ecosystem. Condor, 110, 8092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, L.A. & Walters, J.R. (2008b) Cavity excavation and enlargement as mechanisms for indirect interactions in an avian community. Ecology, 89, 506514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonar, R.L. (2000) Availability of pileated woodpecker cavities and use by other species. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 5259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, R.K., Hebda, G., Maziarz, M., Smith, K.W., Smith, L. & Hinsley, S.A. (2015) Nest-site competition between bumblebees (Bombidae), social wasps (Vespidae) and cavity-nesting birds in Britain and the Western Palearctic. Bird Study, 62, 427437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, E.L. & Jackson, J.A. (2011) Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus). In The Birds of North America online. Poole, A. (ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from Birds of North America online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/148 doi:10.2173/bna.148.Google Scholar
Bunnell, F.L. (2013) Sustaining cavity-using species: Patterns of cavity use and implications to forest management. ISRN Forestry, 2013, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadieux, P. (2011) Dynamics of cavity nesters along a forest age gradient in Boreal mixed wood or eastern North America. MSc Thesis, Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec.Google Scholar
Camprodon, J., Salvanyá, J. & Soler-Zurita, J. (2008) The abundance and suitability of tree cavities and their impact on hole-nesting bird populations in beech forests of NE Iberian Peninsula. Acta Ornithologica, 43, 1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, A., Sandström, U. & Olsson, K. (1998) Availability and use of natural tree holes by cavity nesting birds in a Swedish deciduous forest. Ardea, 86, 109119.Google Scholar
Christman, B.J. & Dhondt, A.A. (1997) Nest predation in Black-capped Chickadees: How safe are cavity nests? Auk, 114, 769773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockle, K.L. & Martin, K. (2015) Temporal dynamics of a commensal network of cavity-nesting vertebrates: Increased diversity during an insect outbreak. Ecology, 96, 10931104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockle, K.L., Martin, K. & Drever, M.C. (2010) Supply of tree-holes limits nest density of cavity-nesting birds in primary and logged subtropical Atlantic forest. Biological Conservation, 143, 28512857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockle, K.L., Martin, K. & Wesołowski, T. (2011) Woodpeckers, decay, and the future of cavity-nesting vertebrate communities worldwide. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 377382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conner, R.N., Rudolph, D.C., Saenz, D. & Schaefer, R.R. (1994) Heartwood, sapwood, and fungal decay associated with Red-cockaded Woodpecker cavity trees. Journal of Wildlife Management, 58, 728734.Google Scholar
Cooke, H.A. & Hannon, S.J. (2011) Do aggregated harvests with structural retention conserve the cavity web of old upland forest in the boreal plains? Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 662674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, H.A. & Hannon, S.J. (2012) Nest site selection by old boreal forest cavity excavators as a basis for structural retention guidelines in spatially-aggregated harvests. Forest Ecology and Management, 269, 3751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czeszczewik, D. & Walankiewicz, W. (2003) Natural nest sites of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in a primeval forest. Ardea, 91, 221230.Google Scholar
Czeszczewik, D., Walankiewicz, W., Mitrus, C. & Nowakowski, W. (1999) Nest-box data of Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca may lead to erroneous generalizations. Vogelwelt, 120, 361365.Google Scholar
Czeszczewik, D., Walankiewicz, W., Mitrus, C. et al. (2013) Importance of dead wood resources for woodpeckers in coniferous stands of the Białowieża Forest. Bird Conservation International, 23, 414425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czeszczewik, D., Walankiewicz, W. & Stańska, M. (2008) Small mammals in nests of cavity-nesting birds: Why should ornithologists study rodents? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 86, 286293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhondt, A.A. (2007) What drives differences between North American and Eurasian tit studies? In The Ecology and Behavior of Chickadees and Titmice. Otter, K. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 299310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drapeau, P., Nappi, A., Imbeau, L. & Saint-Germain, M. (2009) Standing deadwood for keystone bird species in the eastern boreal forest: Managing for snag dynamics. Forestry Chronicle, 85, 227234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drever, M.C., Aitken, K.E.H., Norris, A.R. & Martin, K. (2008) Woodpeckers as reliable indicators of bird richness, forest health and harvest. Biological Conservation, 141, 624634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drever, M.C. & Martin, K. (2010) Response of woodpeckers to changes in forest health and harvest: Implications for conservation of avian biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 958966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
East, M.L. & Perrins, C.M. (1988) The effect of nestboxes on breeding populations of birds in broadleaved temperate woodlands. Ibis, 130, 393401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edworthy, A., Drever, M.C. & Martin, K. (2011) Woodpeckers increase in abundance but maintain fecundity in response to an outbreak of mountain pine bark beetles. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 203210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edworthy, A.B. & Martin, K. (2013) Persistence of tree cavities used by cavity-nesting vertebrates declines in harvested forests. Journal of Wildlife Management, 77, 770776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edworthy, A.B. & Martin, K. (2014) Long-term dynamics of the characteristics of tree cavities used for nesting by vertebrates. Forest Ecology and Management, 334, 122128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edworthy, A.B., Wiebe, K.L. & Martin, K. (2012) Survival analysis of a critical resource for cavity-nesting communities: Patterns of tree cavity longevity. Ecological Applications, 22, 17331742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, M.R., Lank, D.B., Boyd, W.S. & Cooke, F. (2002) A comparison of the characteristics and fate of Barrow’s Goldeneye and Bufflehead nests in nest boxes and natural cavities. Condor, 104, 610619.Google Scholar
Fauvel, B., Carré, F. & Lallement, H. (2001) Middle Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos medius ecology in the Champagne Region (East France). Alauda, 69, 87101 [in French, English summary].Google Scholar
Fisher, R.J. & Wiebe, K.L. (2006) Nest site attributes and temporal patterns of northern flicker nest loss: Effects of predation and competition. Oecologia, 147, 744753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frei, B., Nocera, J.J. & Fyles, J.W. (2015) Interspecific competition and nest survival of the threatened Red-headed Woodpecker. Journal of Ornithology, 156, 743753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, P. & Lindenmayer, D. (2002) Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glutz von Blotzheim, U.N. & Bauer, K.M. (eds.) (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Vol. 9. Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag.Google Scholar
Glutz von Blotzheim, U.N. & Bauer, K.M. (1993) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Vol. 13. Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag.Google Scholar
Gow, E.A., Wiebe, K.L. & Fox, J.W. (2015) Cavity use throughout the annual cycle of a migratory woodpecker as revealed by geolocators. Ibis, 157, 167170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graczyk, R. (1973) Höhlenbrütende Vögel und biologische Bekämpfung von Insekten. Angewandte Ornithologie, 4, 7194.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, L., Baker, S.C., Bauhus, J. et al. (2012) Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: A world perspective. BioScience, 62, 633645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günther, E. (1993) Selection of location of holes of Great Spotted Woodpecker and Middle Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos major and D. medius) in the northeastern Harz Mountains (Sachsen-Anhalt). Ornithologische Mitteilungen des Museum Heineanum, 11, 6773. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar
Günther, E. & Hellmann, M. (1995) Development of holes of spotted woodpeckers (Picoides) in nature-near deciduous forest in the northeastern Harz Mountains (Sachen-Anhalt) – Results of more than ten years of investigations of the use of natural tree holes. Ornithologische Mitteilungen des Museum Heineanum, 13, 2752. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar
Günther, E. & Hellmann, M. (1997) Die Höhlen des Buntspechts – haben wir ihre Bedeutung für die Nachnutzer überschätzt? Naturschutz im Land Sachsen-Anhalt, 34, 1524. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar
Günther, E. & Hellmann, M. (2001) Woodpeckers are seen as ‘key species’ – A key for whom? Abhandlungen und Berichte am dem Museum Heineanum, 5, 722. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar
Günther, E. & Hellmann, M. (2002) Strong decrease of population of tree-breeding Swift Apus apus in the northeastern Harz Mountains (Sachsen-Anhalt) – Was it the Racoon Procyon lotor? Ornithologische Mitteilungen des Museum Heineanum, 20, 8198. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar
Günther, E., Hellmann, M. & Nicolai, B. (2004) Tree-breeding Common Swifts Apus apus – Relicts of ancient forest features? Vogelwelt, 125, 309318. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar
Haftorn, S. & Slagsvold, T. (1995) Egg covering in birds: Description of the behaviour in tits (Parus spp.) and a test of hypotheses of its function. Cinclus, 18, 85-106.Google Scholar
Hagemeijer, E.J.M. & Blair, M.J. (1997) The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds. London: Poyser.Google Scholar
Hansell, M. (2002) Animal Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, F. (1989) Nest hole excavation and reuse of nest holes by the Black Woodpecker on Bornholm, Denmark. Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift, 83, 125129. [in Danish, English summary]Google Scholar
Harding, S.R. & Walters, J.R. (2002) Processes regulating the population dynamics of red-cockaded woodpecker cavities. Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 10831095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebda, G., Wesołowski, T. & Rowiński, P. (2016) Nest sites of Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Leiopicus medius in a primeval forest. Ardea, 104, 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R.F. & Martin, K. (1997) Landscape modification and patch selection: The demography of two secondary cavity nesters colonizing clearcuts. Auk, 114, 443455.Google Scholar
Höntsch, K. (2001) Nesting and roosting holes of Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Picoides minor. Abhandlungen und Berichte am dem Museum Heineanum, 5, 107120. [in German]Google Scholar
Hooge, P.N., Stanback, M.T. & Koenig, W.D. (1999) Nest-site selection in the Acorn Woodpecker. Auk, 116, 4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, S., Kilgore, D.L. & Colby, C. (1987) Respiratory gas concentrations and temperatures within nest cavities of the northern flicker (Colaptes auratus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 65, 15411547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarra, J.T., Martin, M., Cockle, K.L. & Martin, K. (2017) Maintaining ecosystem resilience: functional responses of tree cavity nesters to logging in temperate forests of the Americas. Scientific Reports, 7, 4467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingold, D.J. (1989) Nesting phenology and competition for nest sites among red-headed and red-bellied woodpeckers and European starlings. Auk, 106, 209217.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.A. & Jackson, B.J.S. (2004) Ecological relationships between fungi and woodpecker cavity sites. Condor, 106, 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jędrzejewska, B. & Jędrzejewski, W. (1998). Predation in Vertebrate Communities. The Białowieża Primeval Forest as a Case Study. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, B.T. (1989) Nest trees and nest holes of Black Woodpeckers in North Zealand, 1977–1986 Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift, 83, 119124. [in Danish, English summary]Google Scholar
Johnson, L.S. (2014) House Wren (Troglodytes aedon). In The Birds of North America online. Poole, A. (ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from Birds of North America online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/380 doi:10.2173/bna.380.Google Scholar
Johnsson, K., Nilsson, S.G. & Tjernberg, M. (1990) The black woodpecker – A key-species in European forests. In Conservation and Management of Woodpecker Populations. Carlson, A. & Aulén, G. (eds.). Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, pp. 99103.Google Scholar
Jusino, M.A., Lindner, D.L., Banik, M.T., Rose, K.R. & Walters, J.R. (2016) Experimental evidence of a symbiosis between red-cockaded woodpeckers and fungi. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283, 20160106.Google Scholar
Jusino, M.A., Lindner, D.L., Banik, M.T. & Walters, J.R. (2015) Heart rot hotel: Fungal communities in red-cockaded woodpecker excavations. Fungal Ecology, 14, 3344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juškaitis, R. (2006) Interactions between dormice (Gliridae) and hole-nesting birds in nestboxes. Folia Zoologica, 55, 225236.Google Scholar
Kahler, H.A. & Anderson, J.T. (2006) Tree cavity resources for dependent cavity-using wildlife in West Virginia forests. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 23, 114121.Google Scholar
Kappes, J.J. & Sieving, K.E. (2011) Resin-barrier maintenance as a mechanism of differential predation among occupants of red-cockaded woodpecker cavities. Condor, 113, 362371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keast, A. (1990) Distribution and origin of forest birds. In Biogeography and Ecology of Forest Bird Communities. Keast, A. (ed.). The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing, pp. 4959.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E.D. & White, D.W. (1997) Bewick’s Wren (Thryomanes bewickii). In The Birds of North America, no. 315. Poole, A. & Gill, F. (eds.). Philadelphia & Washington, DC: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia and American Ornithologists’ Union.Google Scholar
Kiełbaska, M. (ed.) (1991) Mała encyklopedia leśna. Warszawa: PWN. [in Polish]Google Scholar
Kilham, L. (1971) Reproductive behavior of Yellow-bellied Sapsuckers. I. Preference for nesting in fomes-infected aspens and nest hole interrelations with flying squirrels, raccoons, and other animals. Wilson Bulletin, 83, 159171.Google Scholar
Koch, A., Martin, K. & Aitken, K.E.H. (2012) The relationship between introduced European Starlings and the reproductive activity of Mountain Bluebirds and Tree Swallows in British Columbia. Ibis, 154, 590600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, W.D. (2003) European starlings and their effect on native cavity-nesting birds. Conservation Biology, 17, 11341140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosiński, Z. & Winiecki, A. (2004) Nest-site selection and niche partitioning among the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos medius in riverine forest of Central Europe. Ornis Fennica, 81, 145156.Google Scholar
Kuitunen, M. & Aleknonis, A. (1992) Nest predation and breeding success in Common Treecreepers nesting in boxes and natural cavities. Ornis Fennica, 69, 712.Google Scholar
Latham, R.E. & Ricklefs, R.E. (1993) Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D. (eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 294314.Google Scholar
Leisne, C. (1991) Untersuchungen zur Frage der nutzunstechnischenfolgen nach Fäll- und Rückeschäden bei Fichte. Freiburg: Mitteilungen der Forstlichen Versuchs und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
Li, P. & Martin, T.E. (1991) Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. Auk, 108, 405418.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D.B., Burton, P.J. & Franklin, J.F. (2008) Salvage Logging and Its Ecological Consequences. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F., Lõhmus, A. et al. (2012) A major shift to the retention approach for forestry can help resolve some global forest sustainability issues. Conservation Letters, 5 , 421431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lõhmus, A. (2003) Do Ural owls (Strix uralensis) suffer from the lack of nests in managed forests? Biological Conservation, 110, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lõhmus, A & Remm, J. (2005) Nest quality limits the number of hole-nesting passerines in their natural cavity-rich habitat. Acta Oecologica, 27, 125128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludescher, F.B. (1973) Sumpfmeise (Parus p. palustris L.) und Weidenmeise (P. montanus salicarius Br.) als sympatrische Zwillingsarten. Journal of Ornithology, 114, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, C.L. & Martin, K. (2006) Nest survival of chickadees in managed forests: Habitat, predator, and year effects. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 12571265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K., Aitken, K.E.H. & Wiebe, K.L. (2004) Nest sites and nest webs for cavity-nesting communities in interior British Columbia, Canada: Nest characteristics and niche partitioning. Condor, 106, 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K. & Eadie, J. M. (1999) Nest webs: A community-wide approach to the management and conservation of cavity-nesting forest birds. Forest Ecology and Management, 115, 243257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K., Ibarra, J.T. & Drever, M. (2015) Avian surrogates in terrestrial ecosystems: Theory and practice. In Indicators and Surrogates in Ecology, Biodiversity and Environmental Management. Lindenmayer, D., Barton, P. & Pierson, J. (eds.). London: CSIRO Publishing, CRC Press, pp. 3344.Google Scholar
Martin, T.E. (1993) Evolutionary determinants of clutch size in cavity-nesting birds: Nest predation or limited breeding opportunities? American Naturalist, 142, 937946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, T.E. (2015) Consequences of habitat change and resource selection specialization for population limitation in cavity-nesting birds. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 475485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, T.E. & Li, P. (1992) Life history traits of open- vs. cavity-nesting birds. Ecology, 73, 579592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthysen, E. (1998) The Nuthatches. London: Poyser.Google Scholar
Mazgajski, T.D. (1997) Changes in the numbers and nest sites of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major and the Middle Spotted Woodpecker D. medius in the Las Bielański Reserve in Warsaw. Ochrona Przyrody, 54, 155160. [in Polish, English summary]Google Scholar
Maziarz, M., Broughton, R.K. & Wesołowski, T. (2017) Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: Implications for hole-nesting birds. Forest Ecology and Management, 389, 306313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maziarz, M. & Wesołowski, T. (2013) Microclimate of tree cavities used by Great Tits (Parus major) in a primeval forest. Avian Biology Research, 6, 4756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maziarz, M. & Wesołowski, T. (2014) Darkness can limit the use of tree cavities for nesting by birds. Journal of Ornithology, 155, 793799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maziarz, M., Wesołowski, T., Hebda, G. & Cholewa, M. (2015a) Natural nest-sites of Great Tits (Parus major) in a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Journal of Ornithology, 156, 613623.Google Scholar
Maziarz, M., Wesołowski, T., Hebda, G., Cholewa, M. & Broughton, R.K. (2015b) Breeding success of Great Tits Parus major in relation to attributes of natural nest-cavities in a primeval forest. Journal of Ornithology, 157, 343354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcdevitt, A.D., Kajtoch, Ł., Mazgajski, T.D., Carden, R.F. & Coscia, I. (2011) The origins of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major colonizing Ireland revealed by mitochondrial DNA. Bird Study, 58, 361364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meidinger, D. & Pojar, J. (eds.) (1991) Ecosystems of British Columbia. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Forests Special Report Series No. 6.Google Scholar
Meyer, W. & Meyer, B. (2001) Construction and use of Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius holes in Thuringia/Germany. Abhandlungen und Berichte am dem Museum Heineanum, 5, 121131. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar
Michon, S. (2014) Comparison of tree cavity abundance and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. MSc Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.Google Scholar
Mikusiński, G. & Angelstam, P. (1997) European woodpeckers and anthropogenic habitat change: A review. Vogelwelt, 118, 277283.Google Scholar
Morozov, N.S. (2009) A city as an object for synecological studies: A search for density compensation among birds breeding in urban woodlands. In Species and Communities in Extreme Environments. Golovatch, S.I., Makarova, O.L., Babenko, A.B. & Penev, L.D. (eds.). Sofia: Pensoft Publishers & KMK Scientific Press, pp. 459520.Google Scholar
Nappi, A. & Drapeau, P. (2009) Reproductive success of the black-backed woodpecker (Picoides arcticus) in burned boreal forests: Are burns source habitats? Biological Conservation, 142, 13811391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nappi, A. & Drapeau, P. (2011) Pre-fire forest conditions and fire severity as determinants of the quality of burned forests for deadwood-dependent species: The case of the black-backed woodpecker Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41, 994-1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nappi, A., Drapeau, P., Angers, V.A. & Saint-Germain, M. (2010) Effect of fire severity on long-term occupancy of saproxylic beetles and bark-foraging birds in burned boreal conifer forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 19, 500511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nappi, A., Drapeau, P. & Leduc, A. (2015) How important is dead wood for woodpeckers foraging in eastern North American boreal forests? Forest Ecology and Management, 346, 1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. (1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: A review. Biological Conservation, 70, 265276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. (1998) Population Limitation in Birds. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, C.L.R., Gates, R.J. & Zwicker, E.H. (2007) Projected availability of natural cavities for wood ducks in Southern Illinois. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 875883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, S.G. (1984) The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: The importance of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scandinavica, 15, 167175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, S.G., Johnsson, K. & Tjernberg, M. (1991) Is avoidance by Black Woodpeckers of old nest holes due to predators? Animal Behaviour, 41, 439441.Google Scholar
Norris, A. (2012) Mechanisms regulating ecological responses to resource pulses within cavity-nesting bird communities. PhD thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Oliver, C.D., Harrington, C. & Bickford, M. (1994) Maintaining and creating old grown structural features in previously disturbed stands typical of eastern Washington Cascades. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2, 353387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouellet-Lapointe, U., Drapeau, P., Cadieux, P. & Imbeau, L. (2012) Woodpecker excavations suitability for and occupancy by cavity users in the boreal mixedwood forest of eastern Canada. Écoscience, 19, 391397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paclík, M., Misík, J. & Weidinger, K. (2009) Nest predation and nest defence in European and North American woodpeckers: A review. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 46, 361379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinelli, G. (2007) Nest site selection in middle and great spotted woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius & D. major: Implications for forest management and conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 12831298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, J-F., D’Astous, E., Villard, M-A. et al. (2013) Brown Creeper (Certhia americana). The Birds of North America online. Poole, A. (ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from Birds of North America online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/669 doi:10.2173/bna.669.Google Scholar
Raphael, M.G. & White, M. (1984) Use of snags by cavity-nesting birds in the Sierra Nevada. Wildlife Monographs, 86, 166.Google Scholar
Remm, J. & Lõhmus, A. (2011) Tree cavities in forest – The broad distribution pattern of a keystone structure for biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 579585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remm, J., Lõhmus, A. & Remm, K. (2006) Tree cavities in riverine forests: What determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines? Forest Ecology and Management, 221, 267277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendell, W.B. & Robertson, R.J. (1989) Nest-site characteristics, reproductive success and cavity availability for tree swallows breeding in natural cavities. Condor, 91, 875885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberge, J.-M., Angelstam, P. & Villard, M.-A. (2008) Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests – Deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning. Biological Conservation, 141, 9971012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, H. & Martin, K. (2013) Resource quantity and quality determine the inter-specific associations between ecosystem engineers and resource users in a cavity-nest web. PLoS ONE, 8(9): e74694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, H., Ciudad, C. & Matthysen, E. (2011) Tree-cavity occurrence, cavity occupation and reproductive performance of secondary cavity-nesting birds in oak forests: The role of traditional management practices. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 14281435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolstad, J., Rolstad, E. & Sæteren, Y. (2000) Black woodpecker nest sites: Characteristics, selection, and reproductive success. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 10531066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruczyński, I. & Bogdanowicz, W. (2005) Roost cavity selection by Nyctalus noctula and N. leisleri (Vespertilionidae, Chiroptera) in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Eastern Poland. Journal of Mammalogy, 86, 921930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudat, V., Kühlke, D., Meyer, W. & Wiesner, J. (1979) On the nest-site ecology of Black Woodpecker (Dryocopus martius [L.]), Tengmalm’s Owl (Aegolius funereus [L.]) and Stock-Dove (Columba oenas [L.]) Zoologische Jahrbücher Systematik, 106, 295310. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar
Rudolph, D.C., Kyle, H. & Conner, R.N. (1990) Red-cockaded Woodpeckers vs rat snakes: The effectiveness of the resin barrier. Wilson Bulletin, 102, 1422.Google Scholar
Saab, V.A., Dudley, J. & Thompson, W.L. (2004) Factors influencing occupancy of nest cavities in recently burned forests. Condor, 106, 2036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saari, L. & Mikusiński, G. (1996) Population fluctuations of woodpecker species on the Baltic Island of Aasla, SW Finland. Ornis Fennica, 73, 168178.Google Scholar
Sandström, U. (1992) Cavities in trees: Their occurrence, formation and importance for hole-nesting birds in relation to silvicultural practice. Report 23. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. (2006) Wood and Tree Fungi. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Schwarze, F.W., Engels, M.R., Engels, J. & Mattheck, C. (2000) Fungal Strategies of Wood Decay in Trees. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, V.E., Evans, K.E., Patton, D.R. & Stone, C.P. (1977) Cavity-nesting Birds of North American Forests. US Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 511.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, J.A. & Knopf, F.L. (1990) Habitat relationships and nest site characteristics of cavity-nesting birds in cottonwood floodplains. Journal of Wildlife Management, 54, 112124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, J.A. & Knopf, F.L. (1991) The loss of avian cavities by injury compartmentalization. Condor, 93, 781783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, J.A. & Knopf, F.L. (1992) Cavity turnover and equilibrium cavity densities in a cottonwood bottomland. Journal of Wildlife Management, 56, 477484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.W. (1997) Nest site selection of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in two oak woods in Southern England and its implications for woodland management. Biological Conservation, 80, 283288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.W. (2007) The utilization of dead wood resources by woodpeckers in Britain. Ibis, 149 (Suppl. 2), 183192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., Consiglio, C., Tanda, F., Lanzuisi, E., Cattaneo, A. & Iavicoli, D. (2000) Predation by snakes on eggs and nestlings of Great Tit Parus major and Blue Tit P. caeruleus. Ibis, 142, 328330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffer, D.F. & Best, L.B. (1982) Nest-site selection by cavity-nesting birds of riparian habitats in Iowa. Wilson Bulletin, 94, 329337.Google Scholar
Straus, M.A., Bavrlic, K., Nol, E., Burke, D.M. & Elliott, K.A. (2011) Reproductive success of cavity-nesting birds in partially harvested woodlots. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41, 10041017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiainen, J., Saurola, P. & Solonen, T. (1984) Nest distribution of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in an area saturated with nestboxes. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 21, 199204.Google Scholar
Tomiałojć, L. (1995) The birds of the Białowieża Forest – Additional data and summary. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 38, 363397.Google Scholar
Tomiałojć, L., Wesołowski, T. & Walankiewicz, W. (1984) Breeding bird community of a primaeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 20, 241310.Google Scholar
Tozer, D.C., Burke, D.M. & Nol, E. (2011) Quality of mature aspen and maple forests for breeding yellow-bellied sapsuckers (Sphyrapicus varius). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 89 , 148160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tozer, D.C., Burke, D.M., Nol, E. & Elliott, K.A. (2012) Managing ecological traps: Logging and sapsucker nest predation by bears. Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 887898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tozer, D.C., Nol, E., Burke, D.M., Elliott, K.A. & Falk, K.J. (2009) Predation by bears on woodpecker nests: Are nestling begging and habitat choice risky business? Auk, 126, 300309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, J.A., Ibarzabal, J., Savard, J.-P.L. & Wilson, S. (2014) Influence of old coniferous habitat on nestling growth of Black-backed Woodpeckers Picoides arcticus. Acta Ornithologica, 49, 273279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, J.A., Savard, J.-P. & Ibarzabal, J. (2015) Structural retention requirements for a key ecosystem engineer in conifer-dominated stands of a boreal managed landscape in eastern Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 357, 220227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, M., Drapeau, P., Robert, M. & Gauthier, T. (2009) Origin and availability of large cavities for Barrow’s Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica), a species at risk inhabiting the eastern Canadian boreal forest. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 4(1), 6. www.ace-eco.org/vol4/iss1/art6/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Balen, J.H., Booy, C.J.H., van Franeker, J.A. & Osieck, E.R. (1982) Studies on hole-nesting birds in natural nest sites. 1. Availability and occupation of natural nest sites. Ardea, 70, 124.Google Scholar
van der Hoek, Y., Gaona, G.V. & Martin, K. (2017) The diversity, distribution and conservation status of the tree-cavity nesting birds of the world. Diversity and Distributions, 23, 11201131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Haartman, L. (1957) Adaptation in hole-nesting birds. Evolution, 11, 339347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walankiewicz, W. (1991) Do secondary cavity-nesting birds suffer more from competition for cavities or from predation in a primeval deciduous forest? Natural Areas Journal, 11, 203212.Google Scholar
Walankiewicz, W. (2002a) Nest predation as a limiting factor to the breeding population size of the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis in the Białowieża National Park (NE Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 37, 91106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walankiewicz, W. (2002b) Breeding losses in the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis caused by nest predators in the Białowieża National Park (Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 37, 2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walankiewicz, W., Czeszczewik, D., Mitrus, C. & Bida, E. (2002) Snag importance for woodpeckers in deciduous stands of the Białowieża Forest. Notatki Ornitologiczne, 43, 6171. [in Polish, English summary]Google Scholar
Walankiewicz, W., Czeszczewik, D., Stański, T., Sahel, M. & Ruczyński, I. (2014) Tree cavity resources in spruce-pine managed and protected stands of the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Natural Areas Journal, 34, 423428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walankiewicz, W. & Mitrus, C. (1997) How nest-box data have led to erroneous generalizations: The case of the competition between Great Tit Parus major and Ficedula flycatchers. Acta Ornithologica, 32, 209212.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (1989) Nest-sites of hole-nesters in a primaeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 25, 321351.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (1995a) The loss of avian cavities by injury compartmentalization in a primeval European forest. Condor, 97, 256257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (1995b) Ecology and behaviour of White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) in a primaeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Vogelwarte, 38, 6175.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (1996) Natural nest sites of Marsh Tits Parus palustris in a primaeval forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Vogelwarte, 38, 235249.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2001) Ground checks – An efficient and reliable method to monitor holes’ fate. Ornis Fennica, 78, 193197.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2002) Antipredator adaptations in nesting marsh tits Parus palustris – The role of nest site security. Ibis, 144, 593601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2003) Bird community dynamics in a primaeval forest – Is interspecific competition important? Ornis Hungarica, 12, 5162.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2007a) Lessons from long-term hole-nester studies in a primeval temperate forest. Journal of Ornithology, 148 (Suppl. 2), 395S405S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2007b) Primeval conditions – What can we learn from them? Ibis, 149 (Suppl. 2), 64S77S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2011a) “Lifespan” of woodpecker-made holes in a primeval temperate forest: A thirty year study. Forest Ecology and Management, 262,18461852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2011b) Reports from nestbox studies: A review of inadequacies. Acta Ornithologica, 46, 1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2012) “Lifespan” of non-excavated holes in a primeval temperate forest: A 30 year study. Biological Conservation, 153, 118126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2013) Timing and stages of nest building by Marsh Tits Poecile palustris in a primaeval forest. Avian Biology Research, 6, 3138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T., Czeszczewik, D., Hebda, G., Maziarz, M., Mitrus, C. & Rowiński, P. (2015) 40 years of breeding bird community dynamics in a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 50, 95-120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T., Czeszczewik, D., Mitrus, C. & Rowiński, P. (2003) Birds of the Białowieża National Park. Notatki Ornitologiczne, 44, 131. [in Polish, English summary]Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T., Czeszczewik, D., Rowiński, P. & Walankiewicz, W. (2002) Nest soaking in natural holes – A serious cause of breeding failure? Ornis Fennica, 79, 132138.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. & Maziarz, M. (2012) Dark tree cavities – A challenge for hole nesting birds? Journal of Avian Biology, 43, 454460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T., Mitrus, C., Czeszczewik, D. & Rowiński, P. (2010) Breeding bird dynamics in a primeval temperate forest over 35 years: Variation and stability in a changing world. Acta Ornithologica, 45, 209232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. & Rowiński, P. (2004) The breeding behaviour of the Nuthatch Sitta europaea in relation to natural hole attributes in a primeval forest. Bird Study, 51, 143155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. & Rowiński, P. (2012) The breeding performance of Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus in relation to the attributes of natural holes in a primeval forest. Bird Study, 59, 437448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. & Rowiński, P. (2014) Do Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus synchronise reproduction with caterpillar peaks in a primeval forest? Bird Study, 61, 235245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T., Rowiński, P., Mitrus, C. & Czeszczewik, D. (2006) Breeding bird community of a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland) at the beginning of the 21st century. Acta Ornithologica, 41, 5570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. & Tomiałojć, L. (1986) The breeding ecology of woodpeckers in a temperate primaeval forest – Preliminary data. Acta Ornithologica, 22, 121.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. & Tomiałojć, L. (2005) Nest sites, nest predation, and productivity of avian broods in a primeval temperate forest: Do the generalisations hold? Journal of Avian Biology, 36, 361367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, A., Cassey, P. & Thomas, C.M. (2015) Microbiology of nests and eggs. In Nests, Eggs and Incubation. Deeming, D.C. & Reynolds, S.J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebe, K.L. (2003) Delayed timing as a strategy to avoid nest-site competition: Testing a model using data from starlings and flickers. Oikos, 100, 291298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebe, K.L. (2011) Nest sites as limiting resources for cavity-nesting birds in mature forest ecosystems: A review of the evidence. Journal of Field Ornithology, 82, 239248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebe, K.L. (2014) Responses of cavity-nesting birds to fire: Testing a general model with data from the Northern Flicker. Ecology, 95, 25372547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebe, K.L. (2017) Northern flickers only work when they have to: How individual traits, population size and landscape disturbances affect excavation rates of an ecosystem engineer. Journal of Avian Biology, 48, 431438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebe, K.L., Koenig, W. D. & Martin, K. (2007) Costs and benefits of nest reuse versus excavation in cavity-nesting birds. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 44, 209217.Google Scholar
Wiebe, K.L. & Moore, W.S. (2008) Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus). In The Birds of North America online. Poole, A. (ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from Birds of North America online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/166a.Google Scholar
Winter, S., Begehold, H., Herrmann, M. et al. (2015) Praxishandbuch – Naturschutz im Buchenwald. Naturschutzziele und Bewirtschaftungsempfehlungen für reife Buchenwälder Nordostdeutschlands. Potsdam: Ministerium für Ländliche Entwicklung, Umwelt und Landwirtschaft Brandenburg.Google Scholar
Worrall, J.J. (2015) Forest & Shade Tree Pathology. www.forestpathology.org/. Accessed 6 December 2015.
Zahner, V., Sikora, L. & Pasinelli, G. (2012) Heart rot as a key factor for cavity tree selection in the black woodpecker. Forest Ecology and Management, 271, 98103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zawadzka, D., Drozdowski, S., Zawadzki, G. & Zawadzki, J. (2016) The availability of cavity trees along an age gradient in fresh pine forests. Silva Fennica, 50, 3, id 1441.Google Scholar
Zwarts, L., Bijlsma, R.G., van den Kamp, J. & Wymenga, E. (2009) Living on the Edge: Wetlands and Birds in a Changing Sahel. Zeist: KNNV Publishing.Google Scholar
11
Cited by