Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:19:51.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Indirect interaction webs propagated by herbivore-induced changes in plant traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University
Timothy P. Craig
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
Peter W. Price
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Timothy P. Craig
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Peter W. Price
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This volume is the first to survey trait-mediated indirect effects in a wide variety of plant-based indirect interaction webs in terrestrial systems. In the introductory chapter we proposed four questions about important patterns in indirect interaction webs: (1) What novel interaction linkages are produced by plant-mediated indirect effects? (2) What complex interactions are generated by plant-mediated indirect effects in multitrophic systems? (3) What are the effects of plant-mediated indirect effects on community structure and biodiversity? and (4) What are the evolutionary consequences of plant-mediated indirect effects? In this chapter we will review the progress that has been made in answering these questions. We will examine the conceptual framework that the study of plant-mediated indirect effects provides for future research on the ecology and evolution of multispecies and multitrophic interactions. We will also explore the impact of these effects that influence the structure of ecological communities and biodiversity.

Ohgushi (2005) surveyed indirect interactions between herbivores through herbivore-induced changes in plants. The key features identified in these interactions are found in the interactions considered in this volume. First, plant-mediated indirect effects are common and widespread because trait changes in plants induced by a range of organisms are ubiquitous in terrestrial plants. Second, plant-mediated interactions occur between temporally separated, spatially separated, and taxonomically distant species. Third, there are often mutualistic interactions between species sharing the same plant because of enhanced resource availability due to compensatory regrowth, and changes in sink–source relationships.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Communities
Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction Webs
, pp. 379 - 410
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, W. G., Blair, C. P., Eubanks, M. D., and Morehead, S. A.. 2003. Sequential radiation of unrelated organisms: the gall fly Eurosta solidaginis and the tumbling flower beetle Mordellistena convicta. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:781–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. A., B. A. Menge, G. G. Mittelbach, D. A. Spiller, and P. Yodzis. 1996. The role of indirect effects in food webs, pp. 371–395 in Polis, G. A. and Winemiller, K. O. (eds.) Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardgett, R. D., and Wardle, D. A.. 2003. Herbivore-mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities. Ecology 84:2258–2268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardgett, R. D., Wardle, D. A., and Yeates, G. W.. 1998. Linking above-ground and below-ground interactions: how plant responses to foliar herbivory influence soil organisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30:1867–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belliure, B., Janssen, A., Maris, P. C., Peters, D., and Sabelis, M. W.. 2005. Herbivore arthropods benefit from vectoring plant viruses. Ecology Letters 8:70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlow, E. L. 1999. Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature 398:330–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlow, E. L., Neutel, A. M., Cohen, J. E., et al. 2004. Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsall, M. B., and Hassell, M. P.. 1997. Apparent competition structures ecological assemblages. Nature 388:371–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E. W., Shurin, J. B., et al. 2005. What determines the strength of a trophic cascade? Ecology 86:528–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, R. M., Pennings, S. C., and Richards, C. L.. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity and interactions among plants. Ecology 84:1115–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., and Kitchell, J. F.. 1993. The Trophic Cascade in Lakes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F., and Hodgson, J. R.. 1985. Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioScience 35:634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, K. 1997. Fungal endophytes, herbivores and the structure of grassland communities, pp. 151–169 in Gange, A. C. and Brown, V. K. (eds.) Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E., and Briand, F.. 1984. Trophic links of community food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 81:4105–4109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constabel, C. P. 1999. A survey of herbivore-inducible defensive proteins and phytochemicals, pp. 137–166 in Agrawal, A. A., Tuzun, S., and Bent, E. (eds.) Induced Plant Defenses against Pathogens and Herbivores:. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society Press.Google Scholar
Craig, T. P., Itami, J. K., Abrahamson, W. G., and Horner, J. D.. 1993. Behavioral evidence for host-race formation in Eurosta solidaginis. Evolution 47:1696–1710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, T. P., Horner, J. D., and Itami, J. K.. 1997. Hybridization studies on the host races of Eurosta solidaginis: implications for sympatric speciation. Evolution 51:1552–1560.Google ScholarPubMed
Craig, T. P., Horner, J. D., and Itami, J. K.. 2001. Genetics, experience and host-plant preference in Eurosta solidaginis: implications for host shifts and speciation. Evolution 55:773–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cyr, H., and Pace, M. L.. 1993. Magnitude and patterns of herbivory in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 361:148–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denno, R. F., McClure, M. S., and Ott, J. R.. 1995. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: competition reexamined and resurrected. Annual Review of Entomology 40:297–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denno, R. F., Gratton, C., Peterson, M. A., et al. 2002. Bottom-up forces mediate natural-enemy impact in a phytophagous insect community. Ecology 83:1443–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, C. S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubanks, M. D., Blair, C. P., and Abrahamson, W. G.. 2003. One host shift leads to another? Evidence of host-race formation in a predaceous gall-boring beetle. Evolution 57:168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forkner, R. E., and Hunter, M. D.. 2000. What goes up must come down? Nutrient addition and predation pressure on oak herbivores. Ecology 81:1588–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, R. S. 1992. Community structure and species interactions of phytophagous insects on resistant and susceptible host plants: ecology, evolution, and genetics, pp. 240–277 in Fritz, R. S. and Simms, E. L. (eds.) Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C., and Brown, V. K.. (eds.) 1997. Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Gastreich, K. R. 1999. Trait-mediated indirect effects of a theridiid spider on an ant–plant mutualism. Ecology 80:1066–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, C. A., and Whitham, T. G.. 1994. Interactions between aboveground herbivores and the mycorrhizal mutualists of plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, C., and Denno, R. F.. 2003. Inter-year carryover effects of a nutrient pulse on Spartina plants, herbivores, and natural enemies. Ecology 84:2692–2707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairston, N. G., Jr, ., and Hairston, N. G., Sr, . 1997. Does food web complexity eliminate trophic-level dynamics? American Naturalist 149:1001–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., and Slobodkin, L. B.. 1960. Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist 94:421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, S. E., and C. G. Jones. 1997. Plant chemistry and herbivory, or why the world is green, pp. 284–324 in Crawley, M. (ed.) Plant Ecology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Hartvigsen, G., Wait, D. A., and Coleman, J. S.. 1995. Tri-trophic interactions influenced by resource availability: predator effects on plant performance depend on plant resources. Oikos 74:463–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, P. E., and P. G. Ayres. 1997. Indirect interactions between insect herbivores and pathogenic fungi on leaves, pp. 133–149 in Gange, A. C. and Brown, V. K. (eds.) Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Hatcher, P. E., Paul, N. D., Ayres, P. G., and Whittaker, J. B.. 1994. Interactions between Rumex spp., herbivores and a rust fungus: Gastrophysa viridula grazing reduces subsequent infection by Uromyces rumicis. Functional Ecology 8:265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukioja, E., and S. Neuvonen. 1987. Insect population dynamics and induction of plant resistance: the testing of hypotheses, pp. 411–432 in Barbosa, P. and Schultz, J. C. (eds.) Insect Outbreaks. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hochberg, M. E., and Lawton, J. H.. 1990. Competition between kingdoms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:367–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hochwender, C. G., and Fritz, R. S.. 2004. Plant genetic differences influence herbivore community structure: evidence from a hybrid willow system. Oecologia 138:547–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, R. D., and Lawton, J. H.. 1994. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, D. U., III, F. S. Chapin, Ewel, J. J., et al. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75:3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. D., and Price, P. W.. 1992. Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724–732.Google Scholar
Hunter, M. D., Ohgushi, T., and Price, P. W. (eds.) 1992. Effects of Resource Distribution on Animal–Plant Interactions. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Inbar, M., Eshel, A., and Wool, D.. 1995. Interspecific competition among phloem-feeding insects mediated by induced host-plant sinks. Ecology 76:1506–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inouye, B., and Stinchcombe, J. R.. 2001. Relationships between ecological interaction modifications and diffuse coevolution: similarities, differences, and casual links. Oikos 95:353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. C., Graham, J. H., and Smith, F. A.. 1997. Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum. New Phytologist 135:575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. N., Douglas, A. E., Woodward, S., and Hartley, S. E.. 2003. Microbial impacts on plant–herbivore interactions: the indirect effects of a birch pathogen on a birch aphid. Oecologia 134:388–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagata, H., Nakamura, M., and Ohgushi, T.. 2005. Bottom-up cascade in a tri-trophic system: different impacts of host-plant regeneration on performance of a willow leaf beetle and its natural enemy. Ecological Entomology 30:58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karban, R., and Baldwin, I. T.. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karban, R., and Myers, J. H.. 1989. Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20:331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondoh, M. 2003. Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science 299:1388–1391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langellotto, G. A., and Denno, R. F.. 2004. Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 139:1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, K. C., and Whitham, T. G.. 1997. Competition between gall aphids and natural plant sinks: plant architecture affects resistance to galling. Oecologia 109:575–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, J. H. 1983. Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 28:23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, J. H. 1989. Food webs, pp. 43–78 in Cherrett, J. M. (ed.) Ecological Concepts: The Contribution of Ecology to an Understanding of the Natural World. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Lawton, H. L., and Warren, P. H.. 1988. Static and dynamic explanations for patterns in food webs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:242–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeman, R. L. 1942. The trophic–dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23:399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losey, J. E., and Denno, R. F.. 1998. Interspecific variation in the escape responses of aphids: effect on risk of predation from foliar-foraging and ground-foraging predators. Oecologia 115:245–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lürling, M. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity in the green algae Desmodesmus and Scenedesmus with special reference to the induction of defensive morphology. International Journal of Limnology 39:85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. 1955. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36:533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, N. D. 1992. Constant connectance in community food webs. American Naturalist 139:1208–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J., Brown, V. K., and Gange, A. C.. 1993. Plant mediated interactions between above- and below-ground insect herbivores. Oikos 66:148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J., Jones, T. H., and Rogers, M.. 2001. Host-plant mediated effects of root herbivory on insect seed predators and their parasitoids. Oecologia 127:246–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattson, W. J. J. 1980. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:119–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. 1973. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
McCann, K. S. 2000. The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405:228–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCann, K., Hastings, A., and Huxel, G. R.. 1988. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395:794–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. 1977. Diversity and stability of ecological communities: a comment on the role of empiricism in ecology. American Naturalist 111:515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. 1985. Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecological Monographs 55:259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menge, B. A. 1995. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: patterns and importance. Ecological Monographs 65:21–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menge, B. A., and G. M. Branch. 2001. Rocky intertidal communities, pp. 221–251 in Bertness, M. D., Gaines, S. D., and Hay, M. E. (eds.) Marine Community Ecology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Mopper, S., J. Maschinski, N. Cobb, and T. G. Whitham. 1991. A new look at habitat structure: consequences of herbivore-modified plant architecture, pp. 260–280 in Bell, S. S., McCoy, E. D., and Mushinsky, H. R. (eds.) Habitat Structure. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, P. J., and Lawler, S. P.. 1995. Food web architecture and population dynamics: theory and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. J., Lewis, O. T., and Godfray, H. C. J.. 2004. Experimental evidence for apparent competition in a tropical forest food web. Nature 428:310–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, C. P. H., Koricheva, J., Huss-Danell, K., Högberg, P., and Joshi, J.. 1999. Insects affect relationships between plant species richness and ecosystem processes. Ecology Letters 2:237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, M., Miyamoto, Y., and Ohgushi, T.. 2003. Gall initiation enhances the availability of food resources for herbivorous insects. Functional Ecology 17:851–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, M., Utumi, S., Miki, T., and Ohgushi, T.. 2005. Flood initiates bottom–up cascades in a tri-trophic system: host plant regrowth increases densities of a leaf beetle and its predators. Journal of Animal Ecology 74:683–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P. 1953. Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia, PA: W. A. Saunders.Google Scholar
Ohgushi, T. 1992. Resource limitation on insect herbivore populations, pp. 199–241 in Hunter, M. D., Ohgushi, T., and Price, P. W. (eds.) Effects of Resource Distribution on Animal–Plant Interactions. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ohgushi, T. 2005. Indirect interaction webs: herbivore-induced effects through trait change in plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36:81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S. D., Arruda, J., and Niemelä, P.. 1981. Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. American Naturalist 118:240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pace, M. L., Cole, J. J., Carpenter, S. R., and Kitchell, J. F.. 1999. Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:483–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paine, R. T. 1980. Food webs: linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure. Journal of Animal Ecology 49:667–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilson, D. 1996. Two herbivores and constraints on selection for resistance in Brassica rapa. Evolution 50:1492–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. L. 1991. Balance of Nature: Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. 2002. Food Webs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L., and Lawton, J. H.. 1977. Number of trophic levels in ecological communities. Nature 268:329–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. L., Lawton, J. H., and Cohen, J. E.. 1991. Food web patterns and their consequences. Nature 350:669–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polis, G. A. 1999. Why are parts of the world green? Multiple factors control productivity and the distribution of biomass. Oikos 86:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polis, G. A., and Strong, D. R.. 1996. Food web complexity and community dynamics. American Naturalist 147:813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polis, G. A., and Winemiller, K. O. (eds.) 1996. Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polis, G. A., Sears, A. L. W., Huxel, G. R., Strong, D. R., and Maron, J.. 2000. When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:473–475.Google Scholar
Price, P. W. 1997. Insect Ecology, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Price, P. W. 2002. Species interactions and the evolution of biodiversity, pp. 3–25 in Herrera, C. M. and Pellmyr, O. (eds.) Plant–Animal Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Price, P. W., Bouton, C. E., Gross, P., et al. 1980. Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. W., Westoby, M., Rice, B., et al. 1986. Parasite mediation in ecological interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17:487–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, D., W. H. van der Putten, L. Persson, et al. 2002. Multi-trophic dynamics and ecosystem processes, pp. 147–154 in Loreau, M., Naeem, S., and Inchausti, P. (eds.) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rehill, B., Class, A., Wieczorek, L., Whitham, T. G., and Lindroth, R. L.. 2005. Foliar phenolic glycosides from Populus fremontii, Populus angustifolia, and their hybrids. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 33:125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, O. J. 1998. Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old-field interaction webs. American Naturalist 151:327–342.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmitz, O. J., Beckerman, A. P., and O'Brien, K. M.. 1997. Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology 78:1388–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, O. J., Krivan, V., and Ovadia, O.. 2004. Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecology Letters 7:153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenly, K., Beaver, R. A., and Heumier, T. A.. 1991. On the trophic relations of insects: a food-web approach. American Naturalist 137:597–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, J. A., Bailey, J. K., Rehill, B. J., et al. 2004. Genetically based trait in a dominant tree affects ecosystem processes. Ecology Letters 7:127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, J. A., Bailey, J. K., Hart, S. C., et al. 2005a. The interaction of plant genotype and herbivory decelerate leaf litter decomposition and alter nutrient dynamics. Oikos 110:133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, J. A., Bailey, J. K., Hart, S. C., and Whitham, T. G.. 2005b. Nonadditive effects of mixing cottonwood genotypes on litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics. Ecology 86:2834–2840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shurin, J. B., Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E. W., et al. 2002. A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecology Letters 5:785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A., Englund, G., and Wooster, D.. 1998. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:350–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, M., and Hilker, M.. 2003. Herbivores and pathogens on willow: do they affect each other? Agricultural and Forest Entomology 5:275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, M. L. 2003. Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms. American Naturalist 162:S10–S23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, S. Y. 1991. Indirect effects in community ecology: their definition, study and importance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:206–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, S. Y. 1997. Floral characters link herbivores, pollinators, and plant fitness. Ecology 78:1640–1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S. Y., and Agrawal, A. A.. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:179–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, S. Y., and Irwin, R. E.. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant–animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:435–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, D. R. 1992. Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology 73:747–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, D. R., Lawton, J. H., and Southwood, R.. 1984. Insects on Plants: Community Patterns and Mechanisms. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Swaty, R. L., Deckert, R. J., Whitham, T. G., and Gehring, C. A.. 2004. Ectomycorrhizal abundance and community composition shifts with drought: predictions from tree rings. Ecology 85:1072–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teder, T., and Tammaru, T.. 2002. Cascading effects of variation in plant vigour on the relative performance of insect herbivores and their parasitoids. Ecological Entomology 27:94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, J. S., Stout, M. J., Karban, R., and Duffey, S. S.. 2001. Jasmonate-mediated induced plant resistance affects a community of herbivores. Ecological Entomology 26:312–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. N. 1994. The Coevolutionary Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. 1996. Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77:350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. 1999. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–1474.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 2000. Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405:208–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tscharntke, T., and Hawkins, B. A. (eds.) 2002. Multitrophic Level Interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putten, W. H., Vet, L. E. M., Harvey, J. A., and Wäckers, F. L.. 2001. Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Donk, E., M. Lürling, and W. Lampert. 1999. Consumer-induced changes in phytoplankton: inducibility, costs, benefits, and the impact on grazers, pp. 89–103 in Tollrian, R. and Harvell, C. D. (eds.) The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wardle, D. A. 2002. Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Yeates, G. W., Williamson, W. M., Bonner, K. I., and Barker, G. M.. 2004. Linking aboveground and belowground communities: the indirect influence of aphid species identity and diversity on a three trophic level soil food web. Oikos 107:283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. E., and Peacor, S. D.. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. C. R. 1993. The Inadequate Environment: Nitrogen and the Abundance of Animals. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, J. T. 1994. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, J. T. 2002. Indirect effects in complex ecosystems: recent progress and future challenges. Journal of Sea Research 48:157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×