Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:07:41.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 70 - Legal Considerations in Obstetric Practice

from Section 8 - Public Health Issues in Obstetrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2021

By
George Gregory Buttigieg
Edited by
Tahir Mahmood ,
Charles Savona Ventura ,
Ioannis Messinis  and
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Tahir Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona Ventura
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
Affiliation:
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access

Summary

The popular connotation that obstetrics is the hardest hit by the suing epidemic is often true. The UK’s £1.7 billion payout for obstetric negligence in 2016/17 also reflects that much of the ‘epidemic’ does in fact involve avoidable mishaps [1]. Furthermore, it is not infrequent for the perception of malpractice to underlie legal litigation and this often implies poor communication between obstetrician and patient. Legal confrontation is not automatically synonymous with medical injury or medical error. In a series of 1452 closed malpractice claims, 3% of patients had no verifiable medical injuries [2]. Why patients sue obstetricians is a question very worth asking. One fact is certain: most obstetricians need to raise constructive awareness (as distinct from defensive practice) of the legal aspects of their practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
The EBCOG Postgraduate Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Obstetrics & Maternal-Fetal Medicine
 , pp. 569 - 575
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Magro, M. Five Years of Cerebral Palsy Claims – A Thematic Review of NHS Resolution Data. London: National Health Service; 2017. https://resolution.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Five-years-of-cerebral-palsy-claims_A-thematic-review-of-NHS-Resolution-data.pdf (Accessed 15/11/2018.)Google Scholar
Studdert, DM, Mello, MM, Gawande, AA, et al. Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2024–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, CB. The decline of the profession of medicine. Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;100(2):221–5.Google ScholarPubMed
G’Sell-Macrez, F. Medical malpractice and compensation in France: Part I: the French rules of medical liability since the Patients’ Rights Law of March 4, 2002. Chicago-Kent Law Rev. 2011;86(3):1093–1123.Google Scholar
Thurn, P. Das patientenrechtegesetz – sicht der rechtsprechung. MedR. 2013;31:153–7.Google Scholar
Fusciani, M. Rischio tecnologico e responsabilità legale in sanità. Milan: Politecnico di Milano; 20 September 2004, 2004/2.Google Scholar
Fava, S. Medico-legal seminar: Medical Association of Malta – 15 October 2002. www.mam.org.mt/newsdetail.asp?i=352&c=1 (Accessed 12/10/2013.)Google Scholar
Economou, C, Kaitelidou, D, Karanikolos, M, Greece, Maresso A. : Health system review. Health Syst in Transit. 2017;19(5):1–166.Google Scholar
News Editor. New forensic and legal medicine findings reported from University of Coimbra – Lessons from a decade of technical-scientific opinions in obstetrical litigation. Forensics: Health & Medicine Week. 15 August 2014: 2711.Google Scholar
Buttigieg, GG, Micallef Stafrace, K. Medico-legal medicine: family practice and the latest views on disclosure of information and consent. Int J Fam Commun Med. 2018;2(2):92–5.Google Scholar
Elliman, S, Spink, A, Lace Mawer, B. Hempsons, Havers P. Cases: failure to administer adequate antenatal care. MJ (a Minor) v Dr Jonathan McLean Hayward (1) and The Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust (2). J Patient Safety Risk Manage 2010;16(1):35–8.Google Scholar
Buttigieg, GG. Re-visiting Bolam and Bolitho in the light of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. Medico-Legal J. 2018;86(1):42–4.Google Scholar
Wrongful birth claim – child missing upper limbs bilaterally. CW v Hospital NHS trust. Clin Risk. 2011;17(6):234.Google Scholar
Failure to administer adequate antenatal care – MJ (a Minor) v Dr Jonathan McLean Hayward (1) and The Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust (2). Clin Risk. 2010;16(1):35.Google Scholar
Ward, CJ. Analysis of 500 obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims: causes and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;16592:298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medscape Malpractice Report. Why ob/gyns get sued. 2015. www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/malpractice-report-2015/obgyn#page=2 (Accessed 05/02/2018.)Google Scholar
Thomas, J. Medical records and issues in negligence. Indian J Urol. 2009;25 3:384–8.Google Scholar
Obstetrics: syntocinon usage, birth asphyxia, death of son – K v Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Trust. Clin Risk. 2002;8(1):37.Google Scholar
Arulkumaran, S, Symonds, M. Intrapartum fetal monitoring – medico-legal implications. Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;1(2):23–6.Google Scholar
Oxygen deprivation following uterine rupture at birth causing cerebral palsy J v Birmingham Women’s Hospital NHS Trust. Clin Risk. 2008;14(6):246.Google Scholar
Buttigieg, GG. The shifting sands of medico-legal intra-partum CTG (I-P CTG) monitoring. Medico-Legal J. 2016;84(1):42–5.Google Scholar
Hinshaw, K, Ullal, A. Peripartum and intra-partum assessment of the fetus. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2007;8:331–6.Google Scholar
Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) : Perinatal Mortality 2007: United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2009.Google Scholar
Steer, PJ. Fetal scalp blood sampling during labour: is it a useful diagnostic test or a historical test which has no longer a place in modern clinical obstetrics? BJOG. 2014;121(13):1749–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, EM, Ruis, KA, Hartman, AL, Northington, FJ, Fox, HE. A systematic review of the role of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia in the causation of neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):587–95.Google Scholar
Magro, M. Five years of cerebral palsy claims A thematic review of NHS Resolution data. September 2017 https://resolution.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Five-years-of-cerebral-palsy-claims_A-thematic-review-of-NHS-Resolution-data.pdf (Accessed 15/11/2018.)Google Scholar
D’Alton, ME, Hankins, GDV, Berkowitz, RL, et al. Executive summary: neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(4):896–901.Google Scholar
Thornton, JG. Pre-term labour: obstetric aspects. Clinical focus – prematurity. Clin Risk. 1999;5(1):1.Google Scholar
Moster, D, Wilcox, AJ, Vollset, SE, Markestad, T, Lie, RT. Cerebral palsy among term and postterm births. JAMA. 2010;304 9:976–82.Google Scholar
Nadel, D, Napley, K, Grace, J, Partridge, R. Case: Brain damage following neonatal hypoglycaemia: H (By her Mother and Litigation Friend M) v London Strategic Health Authority (known as NHS London). Clin Risk. 2008;14(5):200–1.Google Scholar
Buttigieg, GG. Obstetric and medico-legal challenges posed by sudden immigrant shift in a southern Mediterranean island. Anthropology. 2017;5(3):2–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×