Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T04:37:21.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - was not that long ago: A story of gateways and pathways

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2010

Dolly Chugh
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Management and Organizations Department New York University Stern School of Business
Arthur P. Brief
Affiliation:
George Eccles Chair in Business Ethics and Presidential Professor, University of Utah
Arthur P. Brief
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

How long ago was 1964? A long time ago, some would say. The Beatles had just arrived in America, the World Trade Center design was underway, and Nelson Mandela was sentenced to his eventual 27-year imprisonment. The world of 1964 seems very distant from the world of today.

In that year, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act became law in the United States, outlawing discrimination in employment in any business on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Black or white, male or female, the gateway to opportunity opened.

Yet, stunning levels of segregation still exist in the workplace (Tomaskovic-Devey et al., 2006). In the United States, male–female and black–white segregation lessened between 1966 and 1980, but after 1980, only male–female segregation continued to significantly decline. Black–white segregation has essentially remained the same since 1980, and may have worsened in some sectors since 1995.

In fact, in order for sex-neutral employment distribution (i.e., true desegregation) to exist, more than half of all workers would have to switch jobs; for race-neutral (black–white) employment distribution to exist, more than half of all African-Americans would need to switch jobs (Tomaskovic-Devey et al., 2006). Both race and gender segregation remains significant, more than 30 years after the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

This puzzling state of affairs can be explained, we propose, by distinguishing between the gateway to opportunity and diversity in the workplace, and the pathway to success and effectiveness in the workplace.

Type
Chapter
Information
Diversity at Work , pp. 318 - 340
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkes, H. R., and Tetlock, P. E. (2004). Attributions of implicit prejudice, or “Would Jesse Jackson ‘fail’ the Implicit Association Test?Psychological Inquiry, 15(4), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashe, A., and Rampersad, A. (1993). Days of Grace. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R., and Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banaji, M. R., and Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., and Greenwald, A. G. (2004). No place for nostalgia in science: A response to Arkes and Tetlock. Psychological Inquiry, 15(4), 279–310.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S. (2005). Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielby, W. T. (2000). Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1), 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brief, A. P., Butz, R. M., and Deitch, E. A. (2004). Organizations as reflections of their environments: The case of race composition. In Dipboye, R. L. and Colella, A. (eds.), Discrimination at work (pp. 119–148). San Franciso: Jossey Boss.Google Scholar
Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., Cohen, R. R., Pugh, S., and Vaslow, J. B. (2000). Just doing business: Modern racism and obedience to authority as explanations for employment discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(1), 72–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brief, A. P., Umphress, E. E., Dietz, J., Burrows, J. W., Butz, R. M., and Scholten, L. (2005). Community matters: Realistic group conflict theory and the impact of diversity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 830–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cejka, M. A., and Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chugh, D. (2004). Why milliseconds matter: Societal and managerial implications of implicit social cognition. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chugh, D. (2006). Whose Advice Is It Anyway? An Exploration of Bias and Implicit Social Cognition in the Use of Advice. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University, 2006. Dissertation Abstracts International (UMI 3217701).
Deitch, E. A., Barsky, A., Butz, R. M., Chan, S., Brief, A. P., and Bradley, J. (2003). Subtle yet significant: The existence and impact of everyday racial discrimination in the workplace. Social Relations, 56(11), 1299–1324.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., and Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role Interpretation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In Dovidio, J. F. and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism (pp. 61–89). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gilliam, F. D., and Iyengar, S. (2000). The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 560–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., and Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., and Banaji, M. R. (2007). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of Predictive Validity: (manuscript under review).
Hugenberg, K., and Bodenhausen, G. V. (2003). Facing prejudice: Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science, 14(6), 640–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., and Kelly, E. A. (2005). Best Practices or Best Guesses? Diversity Management and the Remediation of Inequality. Working Paper. Department of Sociology, Harvard University.
Karpinski, A., and Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 774–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2004). Implicit methods in social psychology. In Sansone, C., Morf, C. C., and Panter, A. T. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Methods in Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
McConahay, J. B. (1983). Modern racism and modern discrimination: The effects of race, racial attitudes, and context on simulated hiring decisions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(4), 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In Dovidio, J. F. and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism (pp. 91–125). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. R., and Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A., and Hansen, J. (in press). The associations in our heads belong to us: Measuring the multifaceted attitude construct in implicit social cognition. Cognition and Emotion.
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., et al. (2006). Pervasiveness and Correlates of Implicit Attitudes and Stereotypes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Olson, M. A., and Fazio, R. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 653–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Performance and Accountability Report FY 2004 (2005). Management's Discussion and Analysis.
Richeson, J. A., and Shelton, J. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14(3), 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberson, L., Deitch, E. A., Brief, A. P., and Block, C. J. (2003). Stereotype threat and feedback seeking in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 62(1), 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. (1998). Stereotyping and its threat are real. American Psychologist, 53(6), 680–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C. M., and Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroop, J. R. (1935a). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions: George Peabody College for Teachers.
Stroop, J. R. (1935b). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions: George Peabody College for Teachers.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., and Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. C. (1998). How white attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review, 63, 512–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Zimmer, C., Stainback, K., Robinson, C., Taylor, T., and McTague, T. (2006). Documenting desegregation: Segregation in American workplaces by race, ethnicity, and sex, 1966–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 565–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, M. B., Kaplan, S., Brief, A. P., Shull, A., Dietz, J., Mansfield, M. T., and Cohen, R. (2006). Does it pay to be a sexist? The relationship between modern sexism and career outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 524–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., and Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegert, J. C., and Hanges, P. J. (2005). Employment discrimination: The role of implicit attitudes, motivation, and a climate for racial bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 553–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×