Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-14T21:02:27.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2022

David Palmeter ,
Petros C. Mavroidis  and
Niall Meagher
David Palmeter
Affiliation:
Sidley Austin LLP
Petros C. Mavroidis
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Niall Meagher
Affiliation:
Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL)
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization
Practice and Procedure
 , pp. 534 - 546
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Baldwin, Robert E., Non-tariff Distortions in International Trade (The Brookings Institution, 1970).Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish and Patrick, Hugh (eds.), Aggressive Unilateralism: America’s 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System (Michigan University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P., Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement (The Brookings Institution, 2009).Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics or Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Saul and Spaeth, Harold J., Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (4th ed., Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Carter, Barry E. and Trimble, Philip R., International Law (2d ed., Little Brown, 1994).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Harvard University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coke, Edward, Commentary upon Littleton (1628).Google Scholar
Cook, Graham, A Digest of WTO Jurisprudence on Public International Law Concepts and Principles (Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croome, John, Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round (World Trade Organization, 1995).Google Scholar
Czako, Judith, Human, Johann, and Miranda, Jorge, A Handbook on Anti-Dumping Investigations (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Dam, Kenneth W., The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization (Chicago University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Damrosch, Lori F., Henkin, Louis, Pugh, Richard, Schacter, Oscar, and Schmidt, Hans, International Law (2d ed., West, 2002).Google Scholar
David, Rene, French Law: Its Structure, Sources, and Methodology (Michael Kindred, trans.) (Louisiana State University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
European Commission, Report on United States Barriers to Trade and Investment (2002).Google Scholar
Evans, Malcolm (ed.), Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma (Hart, 1998).Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas, Fairness In International Law and Institutions (Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Gardner, Richard N., Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy in Current Perspective: The Origins and Prospects of Our International Economic Order (Columbia University Press edn., 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, Richard H., Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse (Yale University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Gobind Daswani, Arti, Santana, Roy, and Volkai, János, GATT Disputes: 1947–1995 (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Grando, Michelle T., Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, Judicial Remedies in International Law (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (2d ed., Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard and Kostecki, Michael, The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to the WTO (Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System (Butterworth, 1993).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy (2d ed., Butterworth, 1990).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., GATT and the Developing Countries (Trade Policy Research Centre, 1988).Google Scholar
International Law Commission, Report (United Nations, 2000).Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A., Clashing Over Commerce (University of Chicago Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A., Mavroidis, Petros C., and Sykes, Alan O., The Genesis of the GATT (Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John H., The World Trading System (2d ed., MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., World Trade and the Law of GATT (Bobbs-Merrill, 1969).Google Scholar
Kazazi, Mojtaba, Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evidence before International Tribunals (Wolters Kluwer, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji, and Chen, Tsai-Fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Oliver, Law and Its Limitations in the GATT Multilateral Trade System (Martinus Nijhoff, 1985).Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, 5 Selected GATT/WTO Panel Reports: Summaries and Commentaries (Fair Trade Center, 1999).Google Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schonbaum, Thomas J., Mavroidis, Petros C., and Hahn, Michael J., The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., The Regulation of International Trade, Volume 3, The General Agreement on Trade in Services (MIT Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John Henry, The Civil Law Tradition (2d ed., Stanford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick, La Nouvelle OMC (Dunod, 1995).Google Scholar
Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.) Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de, The Complete Essays of Montaigne (Frame, Donald M., ed.) (Stanford University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick, On The Law Of Nations (Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Mshomba, Richard E., Africa and the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law (Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur, eds.) (9th ed., Longman, 1992).Google Scholar
Paemen, Hugo and Bensch, Alexandra, From the GATT to the WTO: The European Community in the Uruguay Round (Leuven University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David, The WTO as a Legal System: Essays on International Trade Law and Policy (Cameron May, 2003).Google Scholar
Preeg, Ernest H., Traders in a Brave New World: The Uruguay Round and the Future of the International Trading System (Chicago University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai, The World Court (5th ed., Martinus Nijhoff, 1995).Google Scholar
Sands, Phillipe, Principles of International Environmental Law (Manchester University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C. and Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo (eds.), Dispute Settlement At The WTO: The Developing Country Experience (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Schott, Jeffrey J., The Uruguay Round: An Assessment (Institute for International Economics, 1994).Google Scholar
Shahabuddeen, Mohamed, Precedent in the World Court (Grotius, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law (Grotius, 1991).Google Scholar
Steil, Ben, The Battle of Bretton Woods (Princeton University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Terence P. (ed.), The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History (1986–1992) (Wolters Kluwer, 1993).Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, The Sources of International Law, (2d ed., Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
van Damme, Isabelle, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body (Oxford University Press, 2009), 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vanGrasstek, Craig, The History and Future of the World Trade Organization (WTO, 2013).Google Scholar
vanGrasstek, Craig Trade and American Leadership: The paradoxes of Power and Wealth from Alexander Hamilton to Donald Trump (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Walker, David M., The Scottish Legal System (W. Green & Son, 1981).Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clair, A Charter For World Trade (Macmillan, 1949).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, Analytical Index, Guide to GATT Law and Practice (WTO, 1995).Google Scholar
Ziccardi Capaldo, Giuliana, 2008. The Pillars of Global Law (Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Alexandrov, Stanimir A., Non-appearance before the International Court of Justice, 33 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 41 (1995).Google Scholar
Anderson, Kym, Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, 1 World Trade Review 123 (No. 2, July 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, 35 Journal of World Trade 499 (No. 3, June 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentes, Pablo M., Adjudicating Implementation of Recommendations and Rulings of the DSB under Article 21.5 of the DSU, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 211–24 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Bilder, Richard B., The Fact/Law Distinction in International Adjudication, in Lillich, Richard (ed.), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals 95 (Transnational, 1991).Google Scholar
Bohanes, Jan and Garza, Fernanda, Going Beyond Stereotypes: Participation of Developing Countries in WTO Dispute Settlement, 4 Trade, Law and Development 45 (No. 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Bohanes, Jan and Lockhart, Nicolas, Standard of Review in WTO Law, in Bethlehem, Daniel, McRae, Donald, Neufeld, Rodney, and Van Damme, Isabelle (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law 378–436 (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Bohanes, Jan, and Sennekamp, Andreas, Reflections on the Concept of Judicial Economy in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio, Yanovich, Alan, and Bohanes, Jan (eds.), The WTO At 10: The Role Of The Dispute Settlement System 460 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Bourgeois, Jacques H. J., Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Carmody, Chi, Remedies and Conformity under the WTO Agreement, 5 Journal of International Economic Law 307 (No. 2, June 2002).Google Scholar
Cartland, Michael, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Chang, Seung Wha, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve, Should the Teeth Be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 602 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve The WTO’s Problematic “Last Resort” Against Noncompliance, 57 Aussenwirtschaft 407–40 (No. 4, 2002).Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix S., Field Theory and Judicial Logic, 59 Yale Law Journal 238 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, Katherine, Coppens, Dominic, Friedbacher, Todd, and Lockhart, Nicolas, Evidence in WTO Dispute Settlement: From the Burden of Proof to Invisible Experts, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects Of WTO Litigation 301–34 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, The WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 187 (No. 1, March 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croley, Steven P. and Jackson, John H., WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments, 90 American Journal of International Law 193 (April 1996).Google Scholar
Davey, William J., The First Years of WTO Dispute Settlement: Dealing with Controversy and Building Confidence, in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law and Lawyers In The GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law In The Multilateral Trading System 353–73 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Davey, William J., Reforming WTO Dispute Settlement, in Matsushita, Mitsuo and Ahn, Dukgeun (eds.), New Perspectives on the World Trading System: WTO and East Asia (Cameron May 2004).Google Scholar
Davey, William J. The Case for a Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 177 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Davey, William J. A Permanent Panel Body for WTO Dispute Settlement: Desirable or Practical? in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 496 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Davey, William J. WTO Dispute Settlement: Segregating the Useful Political Aspects and Avoiding “Over-Legalization,” in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 291 (Wolters Kluwer, 2000).Google Scholar
Davey, William J. Dispute Settlement in GATT, 11 Fordham International Law Journal 51 (1987).Google Scholar
De Souza Farias, Rogério, Mr GATT: Eric Wyndham-White, and the Quest for Trade Liberalization, 12 World Trade Review 463–85 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, William, Reflections on the International Trade Organization, 14 Northern Illinois University Law Review 335 (1993–94).Google Scholar
Donaldson, Victoria and Yanovich, Alan, The Appellate Body’s Working Procedures for Appellate Review, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio, Yanovich, Alan, and Bohanes, Jan (eds.), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System 386–413 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court”: Some Personal Experiences as a Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, 36 Journal of World Trade 605 (No. 4, August 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganesan, A. V., The Appellate Body in its Formative Years, in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System 517–46 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Marissa, Legal Basis and Procedures for Consulting with Experts and International Organizations in WTO Dispute Settlement, 9 Journal Of International Dispute Settlement 423–32 (No. 3, September 2018).Google Scholar
Grané, Patricio, Remedies under WTO Law, 4 Journal of International Economic Law 755 (No. 4, December 2001).Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M. and Mavroidis, Petros C., Would’ve or Should’ve? Impaired Benefits Due to Copyright Infringement, US–Section 110 (5), in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law, The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies 294–314 (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M. and Mavroidis, Petros C United States – Section 110 (5) of the US Copyright Act, Recourse to Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU: Would’ve or Should’ve? Impaired Benefits due to Copyright Infringement, 2 World Trade Review 281–99 (No. 2, July 2003).Google Scholar
Guth, Eckart, The End of the Bananas Saga, 46 Journal of World Trade 1–32 (2012).Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Saluste, Maarja, Informing WTO Reform: Dispute Settlement Performance, 1995–2020, 55 Journal of World Trade 1–50 (No. 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Horlick, Gary N., Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 636 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Wijkström, Erik, In the Shadow of the DSU: Addressing Specific Trade Concerns in the WTO SPS and TBT Committees, Research Institute of Industrial Economics IFN Working Paper No. 960, 2013; Columbia University Law School, The Center for Law & Economic Studies Working Paper No. 494 (2013).Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Johanneson, Louise, and Mavroidis, Petros C., The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2010: Some Descriptive Statistics, 45 Journal Of World Trade 1107 (No. 11, 2011).Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, Trade, Environment and the Role of NGOs, 4 Journal of World Intellectual Property 277 (No. 4, March 2001).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Weiss, Friedl (ed.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues & Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts & Tribunals 369 (Cameron May, 2000).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. A Diplomat’s Jurisprudence, in Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law 21 (Cameron May, 1999).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an “Aim and Effects” Test, 32 The International Lawyer 619, reprinted in Robert E. Hudec, Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law (Cameron May, 1999).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. The Role of the GATT Secretariat in the Evolution of the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure, in Bhagwati, Jagdish and Hirsch, Mathias (eds.), The Uruguay Round and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Arthur Dunkel 101 (Springer-Verlag, 1998).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. Reforming GATT Adjudication Procedures: The Lessons of the DISC Case, Minnesota Law Review 2240 (1988).Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., The Jurisprudence of International Trade, 72 American Journal of International Law 747–81 (No. 4, 1978).Google Scholar
Jansen, Bernhard, Scope of Jurisdiction in GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement: Consultations and Panel Requests, in Weiss, Friedl (ed.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals 45–54 (Cameron May, 2000).Google Scholar
Johannesson, Louise and Mavroidis, Petros C., The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995‒2015: A Data Set and Its Descriptive Statistics, IFN Working Paper No. 1148 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolsky Lewis, Meredith, The Lack of Dissent in WTO Dispute Settlement, 9 Journal of International Economic Law 895–931 (No. 4, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuyper, Pieter Jan, The Appellate Body and the Facts, in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 309 (Wolters Kluwer, 2000).Google Scholar
Lacarte, Julio, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Lafer, Celso, The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System (1996 Gilberto Amado Memorial Lecture, United Nations, 1996).Google Scholar
Lennard, Michael, Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements, 5 Journal of International Economic Law 17 (March 2002).Google Scholar
Levy, Philip, and Srinivasan, T. N., Regionalism and the (Dis)advantage of Dispute-Settlement Access, 86 American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 93–98 (1996).Google Scholar
Long, Russell, United States Law and the International Antidumping Code, 3 International Lawyer 464 (1969).Google Scholar
Lugard, Maurits, Scope of Appellate Review: Objective Assessment of the Facts and Issues of Law, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 323 (1998).Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement, 33 Journal of World Trade 87 (No. 5, October 1999).Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights, 13 European Journal of International Law 753 (2002).Google Scholar
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J., Capacity to Sue and be Sued under WTO Law, 3 World Trade Review 27 (No. 1, March 2004).Google Scholar
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J. Presumptions and Burden of Proof in World Trade Law, 14 Journal of International Arbitration 67 (No. 1, March 1997).Google Scholar
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J. World Trade Dispute Settlement and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule, 30 Journal of World Trade 107 (No. 4, August 1996).Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya and Mavroidis, Petros C., Trade Environment and the WTO: How Real Is the Conflict?, in Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (ed.), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (Wolters Kluwer, 1997).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Meagher, Niall, Prusa, Thomas J., and Yanguas, Tatiana, Ask for the Moon, Settle for the Stars: What Is a Reasonable Period of Time To Comply With WTO Awards?, 16 World Trade Review 395–425 (No. 2, 2017).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Dispute Settlement in the WTO (Mind Over Matter) (May 2015). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2015/34.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. Proposal for Reform of Article 22 of the DSU: Reconsidering the Sequencing Issue and Suspension of Concessions, in Petersmann, Ernst Ulrich (ed.), Preparing for the Doha Development Round 81 (European University Institute, 2002).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. Amicus Curiae Briefs before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing, in von Bogdandy, Armin, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Meny, Yves (eds.), European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann 317–29 (Wolters Kluwer, 2002).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place, 11 European Journal of International Law 763 (No. 4, December 2000).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. Government Procurement Agreement: The Trondheim Case, 49 Aussenwirtschaft 77 (1993).Google Scholar
McRae, Donald, What Is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 3 (No. 1, March 2004).Google Scholar
McGivern, Brendan P., The Last Resort: WTO Retaliation Proceedings, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 225–44 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
McGivern, Brendan P. Seeking Compliance with WTO Rulings: Theory, Practice, and Alternatives, 36 International Lawyer 141 (No. 1, Spring 2002).Google Scholar
Meagher, Niall P., The Sound of Silence: Giving Meaning to Omissions in Provisions of the WTO Agreements, 37 Journal of World Trade 417 (No. 2, April 2003).Google Scholar
Meagher, Niall P. Representing Developing Countries before the WTO: The Role of the Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL), EUI RSCAS Policy Paper 2015/02 (2015).Google Scholar
Meagher, Niall P. and Buencamino, Leah, The Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford University Press, 2019) https://bit.ly/3aPovuA.Google Scholar
Meagher, Niall P. and Buencamino, Leah Legal Remedies and Effective Compliance, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 197–210 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio, Preparing for a WTO Dispute Settlement Resolution Proceeding: The Decision-Making Process, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 7–22 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio The Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process, 6 Global Trade and Customs Journal 325–38 (No. 7/8, July 2011).Google Scholar
Monnier, Pierre, The Time to Comply with an Adverse WTO Ruling, 35 Journal of World Trade 825 (No. 5, October 2001).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A., “Inducing Compliance” in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 646 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. The WTO as a Legal System, 24 Fordham International Law Journal 444 (November–December 2000).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. The WTO Appellate Body Needs Remand Authority, 32 Journal of World Trade 51 (No. 1, February 1998).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. The WTO Appellate Body’s First Decision, 9 Leiden Journal of International Law 337 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. Section 337 and the WTO Agreements: Still in Violation?, 20 World Competition No. 1 (September 1996).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. A Commentary on the WTO Anti-Dumping Code, 30 Journal of World Trade 43 (No. 4, August 1996).Google Scholar
Parcero Herrera, Tania and Pereyra, María J., The Role and Assistance of the WTO Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects Of WTO Litigation 63–86 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?, 95 American Journal of International Law 535 (April 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach, 94 American Journal of International Law 535 (April 2000).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 227 (1998).Google Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi, How Much Time Is Reasonable – The Arbitral Decisions Under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU, 26 Berkeley Journal of International Law 323–51 (No. 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, The Dispute Settlement of the World Trade Organization and the Evolution of the GATT Dispute Settlement System Since 1948, 31 Common Market Law Review 1157 (1994).Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich Dispute Settlement Proceedings in the Field of Antidumping Law, 28 Common Market Law Review 69 (1991).Google Scholar
Piérola, Fernando, Reflections on Selected DSU Review Proposals Having an Impact on the Functioning of the WTO Dispute Settlement System, in Streatfield, Jeremy and Lacey, Simon (eds.), New Reflections On International Trade: Essays On Agriculture, WTO Accession, And Systemic Issues 169–97 (Cameron May, 2008).Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A., Judges’ Writing Styles (And Do They Matter?), 2 University of Chicago Law Review 1421, 1447 (1995).Google Scholar
Porges, Amelia, Step by Step to an International Trade Court, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 496 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Quick, Reinhard, Trade, Environment and the Role of NGOs, 4 Journal of World Intellectual Property 281 (No. 4, March 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, Frieder and Gappah, Petina, A Re-Appraisal of Non-Violation Complaints under the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures, in McRory, Patrick F. J., Appleton, Arthur E., and Plummer, Michael G. (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic, And Political Analysis, Vol. 1 (Springer, 2005), 1371–87.Google Scholar
Roessler, Frieder, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Roessler, Frieder The concept of nullification and impairment in the legal system of the World Trade Organization, in International Trade Law And The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, Studies in Transnational Economic Law, Volume 11 (ed. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich ) 123–42 (Kluwer Law International, 1997).Google Scholar
Roessler, Frieder Changes in the Jurisprudence of the WTO Appellate Body During the Past Twenty Years, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/72.Google Scholar
de Scitovsky, Tibor, A Reconsideration of Theory of Tariffs (1942), in Papers on welfare and growth 139 (Allen & Unwin, 1964).Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N., The International Court of Justice: A Practical Perspective, 46 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 831–65 (2008).Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N. A Practical Look at the International Court of Justice, in Evans, Malcolm (ed.), Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma 13 (Hart, 1998).Google Scholar
Shoyer, Andrew W., Panel Selection in WTO Proceedings, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 203 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Srinivasan, T. N., Nondiscrimination in GATT/WTO: Was There Anything to Begin with and Is There Anything Left? 4 World Trade Review 69–95 (No. 1, 2005).Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance? in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 347 (Wolters Kluwer, 2000).Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Yasuhei, Understanding the Concept of Prima Facie Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Janow, Merit E., Donaldson, Victoria, and Yanovich, Alan (eds.), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement And Developing Countries 553 (Juris Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Tarullo, Daniel K., The Relationship of WTO Obligations to Other International Arrangements, in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 155 (Wolters Kluwer, 2000).Google Scholar
Thomas, J. C., The Need for Due Process in WTO Proceedings, 31 Journal of World Trade 45 (No. 1, February 1997).Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., The Domain of WTO Dispute Settlement, 40 Harvard International Law Journal 333 (Spring, 1999).Google Scholar
Unterhalter, David, The Authority of an Institution: The Appellate Body under Review, in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law And Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System 466–75 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Unterhalter, David The Burden of Proof in Dispute Settlement in Janow, Merit E., Donaldson, Victoria, and Yanovich, Alan (eds.), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement And Developing Countries 543 (Juris Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Valles, Cherise M., Different Forms of Expert Involvement in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, 9 Journal OF International Dispute Settlement 367–78 (No. 3, September 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valles, Cherise M. and McGivern, Brendan P., The Right to Retaliate under the WTO Agreement: The “Sequencing” Problem, 34 Journal of World Trade 63 (No. 2, 2000).Google Scholar
Van Damme, Isabelle, Preliminary Challenges and Rulings, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects Of WTO Litigation 257–300 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, Awarding Damages or Demanding Performance? A Performance-Oriented Approach for International Investment Law, FGV DIREITO SP Research Paper Series n. 109 (ISSN 2358-1565) (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voon, Tania and Yanovich, Alan, The Facts Aside: The Limitation of WTO Appeals to Issues of Law, 40 Journal of World Trade 239–58 (No. 2, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasescha, Luzius, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H., The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement, 35 Journal of World Trade 191 (No. 2, April 2001).Google Scholar
Williams, Peter, Law and Lawyers in the Multilateral Trading System: Back to the Future, in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO 85 (Cambridge University Press and the WTO, 2015).Google Scholar
Yanguas, Tatiana, Determining the Reasonable Period of Time for Compliance, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio, Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 153–74 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Zonnekeyn, Geert A., The Appellate Body’s Communication on Amicus Curiae Briefs in the Asbestos Case, 35 Journal of World Trade 553 (No. 3, June 2001).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Alexandrov, Stanimir A., Non-appearance before the International Court of Justice, 33 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 41 (1995).Google Scholar
Anderson, Kym, Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, 1 World Trade Review 123 (No. 2, July 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, 35 Journal of World Trade 499 (No. 3, June 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentes, Pablo M., Adjudicating Implementation of Recommendations and Rulings of the DSB under Article 21.5 of the DSU, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 211–24 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Bilder, Richard B., The Fact/Law Distinction in International Adjudication, in Lillich, Richard (ed.), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals 95 (Transnational, 1991).Google Scholar
Bohanes, Jan and Garza, Fernanda, Going Beyond Stereotypes: Participation of Developing Countries in WTO Dispute Settlement, 4 Trade, Law and Development 45 (No. 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Bohanes, Jan and Lockhart, Nicolas, Standard of Review in WTO Law, in Bethlehem, Daniel, McRae, Donald, Neufeld, Rodney, and Van Damme, Isabelle (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law 378–436 (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Bohanes, Jan, and Sennekamp, Andreas, Reflections on the Concept of Judicial Economy in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio, Yanovich, Alan, and Bohanes, Jan (eds.), The WTO At 10: The Role Of The Dispute Settlement System 460 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Bourgeois, Jacques H. J., Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Carmody, Chi, Remedies and Conformity under the WTO Agreement, 5 Journal of International Economic Law 307 (No. 2, June 2002).Google Scholar
Cartland, Michael, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Chang, Seung Wha, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve, Should the Teeth Be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 602 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve The WTO’s Problematic “Last Resort” Against Noncompliance, 57 Aussenwirtschaft 407–40 (No. 4, 2002).Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix S., Field Theory and Judicial Logic, 59 Yale Law Journal 238 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, Katherine, Coppens, Dominic, Friedbacher, Todd, and Lockhart, Nicolas, Evidence in WTO Dispute Settlement: From the Burden of Proof to Invisible Experts, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects Of WTO Litigation 301–34 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, The WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 187 (No. 1, March 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croley, Steven P. and Jackson, John H., WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments, 90 American Journal of International Law 193 (April 1996).Google Scholar
Davey, William J., The First Years of WTO Dispute Settlement: Dealing with Controversy and Building Confidence, in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law and Lawyers In The GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law In The Multilateral Trading System 353–73 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Davey, William J., Reforming WTO Dispute Settlement, in Matsushita, Mitsuo and Ahn, Dukgeun (eds.), New Perspectives on the World Trading System: WTO and East Asia (Cameron May 2004).Google Scholar
Davey, William J. The Case for a Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 177 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Davey, William J. A Permanent Panel Body for WTO Dispute Settlement: Desirable or Practical? in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 496 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Davey, William J. WTO Dispute Settlement: Segregating the Useful Political Aspects and Avoiding “Over-Legalization,” in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 291 (Wolters Kluwer, 2000).Google Scholar
Davey, William J. Dispute Settlement in GATT, 11 Fordham International Law Journal 51 (1987).Google Scholar
De Souza Farias, Rogério, Mr GATT: Eric Wyndham-White, and the Quest for Trade Liberalization, 12 World Trade Review 463–85 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, William, Reflections on the International Trade Organization, 14 Northern Illinois University Law Review 335 (1993–94).Google Scholar
Donaldson, Victoria and Yanovich, Alan, The Appellate Body’s Working Procedures for Appellate Review, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio, Yanovich, Alan, and Bohanes, Jan (eds.), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System 386–413 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court”: Some Personal Experiences as a Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, 36 Journal of World Trade 605 (No. 4, August 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganesan, A. V., The Appellate Body in its Formative Years, in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System 517–46 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Marissa, Legal Basis and Procedures for Consulting with Experts and International Organizations in WTO Dispute Settlement, 9 Journal Of International Dispute Settlement 423–32 (No. 3, September 2018).Google Scholar
Grané, Patricio, Remedies under WTO Law, 4 Journal of International Economic Law 755 (No. 4, December 2001).Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M. and Mavroidis, Petros C., Would’ve or Should’ve? Impaired Benefits Due to Copyright Infringement, US–Section 110 (5), in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law, The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies 294–314 (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M. and Mavroidis, Petros C United States – Section 110 (5) of the US Copyright Act, Recourse to Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU: Would’ve or Should’ve? Impaired Benefits due to Copyright Infringement, 2 World Trade Review 281–99 (No. 2, July 2003).Google Scholar
Guth, Eckart, The End of the Bananas Saga, 46 Journal of World Trade 1–32 (2012).Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Saluste, Maarja, Informing WTO Reform: Dispute Settlement Performance, 1995–2020, 55 Journal of World Trade 1–50 (No. 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Horlick, Gary N., Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 636 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Wijkström, Erik, In the Shadow of the DSU: Addressing Specific Trade Concerns in the WTO SPS and TBT Committees, Research Institute of Industrial Economics IFN Working Paper No. 960, 2013; Columbia University Law School, The Center for Law & Economic Studies Working Paper No. 494 (2013).Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Johanneson, Louise, and Mavroidis, Petros C., The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2010: Some Descriptive Statistics, 45 Journal Of World Trade 1107 (No. 11, 2011).Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, Trade, Environment and the Role of NGOs, 4 Journal of World Intellectual Property 277 (No. 4, March 2001).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Weiss, Friedl (ed.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues & Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts & Tribunals 369 (Cameron May, 2000).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. A Diplomat’s Jurisprudence, in Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law 21 (Cameron May, 1999).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an “Aim and Effects” Test, 32 The International Lawyer 619, reprinted in Robert E. Hudec, Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law (Cameron May, 1999).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. The Role of the GATT Secretariat in the Evolution of the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure, in Bhagwati, Jagdish and Hirsch, Mathias (eds.), The Uruguay Round and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Arthur Dunkel 101 (Springer-Verlag, 1998).Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. Reforming GATT Adjudication Procedures: The Lessons of the DISC Case, Minnesota Law Review 2240 (1988).Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., The Jurisprudence of International Trade, 72 American Journal of International Law 747–81 (No. 4, 1978).Google Scholar
Jansen, Bernhard, Scope of Jurisdiction in GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement: Consultations and Panel Requests, in Weiss, Friedl (ed.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals 45–54 (Cameron May, 2000).Google Scholar
Johannesson, Louise and Mavroidis, Petros C., The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995‒2015: A Data Set and Its Descriptive Statistics, IFN Working Paper No. 1148 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolsky Lewis, Meredith, The Lack of Dissent in WTO Dispute Settlement, 9 Journal of International Economic Law 895–931 (No. 4, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuyper, Pieter Jan, The Appellate Body and the Facts, in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 309 (Wolters Kluwer, 2000).Google Scholar
Lacarte, Julio, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Lafer, Celso, The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System (1996 Gilberto Amado Memorial Lecture, United Nations, 1996).Google Scholar
Lennard, Michael, Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements, 5 Journal of International Economic Law 17 (March 2002).Google Scholar
Levy, Philip, and Srinivasan, T. N., Regionalism and the (Dis)advantage of Dispute-Settlement Access, 86 American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 93–98 (1996).Google Scholar
Long, Russell, United States Law and the International Antidumping Code, 3 International Lawyer 464 (1969).Google Scholar
Lugard, Maurits, Scope of Appellate Review: Objective Assessment of the Facts and Issues of Law, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 323 (1998).Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement, 33 Journal of World Trade 87 (No. 5, October 1999).Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights, 13 European Journal of International Law 753 (2002).Google Scholar
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J., Capacity to Sue and be Sued under WTO Law, 3 World Trade Review 27 (No. 1, March 2004).Google Scholar
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J. Presumptions and Burden of Proof in World Trade Law, 14 Journal of International Arbitration 67 (No. 1, March 1997).Google Scholar
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J. World Trade Dispute Settlement and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule, 30 Journal of World Trade 107 (No. 4, August 1996).Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya and Mavroidis, Petros C., Trade Environment and the WTO: How Real Is the Conflict?, in Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (ed.), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (Wolters Kluwer, 1997).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Meagher, Niall, Prusa, Thomas J., and Yanguas, Tatiana, Ask for the Moon, Settle for the Stars: What Is a Reasonable Period of Time To Comply With WTO Awards?, 16 World Trade Review 395–425 (No. 2, 2017).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Dispute Settlement in the WTO (Mind Over Matter) (May 2015). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2015/34.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. Proposal for Reform of Article 22 of the DSU: Reconsidering the Sequencing Issue and Suspension of Concessions, in Petersmann, Ernst Ulrich (ed.), Preparing for the Doha Development Round 81 (European University Institute, 2002).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. Amicus Curiae Briefs before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing, in von Bogdandy, Armin, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Meny, Yves (eds.), European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann 317–29 (Wolters Kluwer, 2002).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place, 11 European Journal of International Law 763 (No. 4, December 2000).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. Government Procurement Agreement: The Trondheim Case, 49 Aussenwirtschaft 77 (1993).Google Scholar
McRae, Donald, What Is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?, 7 Journal of International Economic Law 3 (No. 1, March 2004).Google Scholar
McGivern, Brendan P., The Last Resort: WTO Retaliation Proceedings, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 225–44 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
McGivern, Brendan P. Seeking Compliance with WTO Rulings: Theory, Practice, and Alternatives, 36 International Lawyer 141 (No. 1, Spring 2002).Google Scholar
Meagher, Niall P., The Sound of Silence: Giving Meaning to Omissions in Provisions of the WTO Agreements, 37 Journal of World Trade 417 (No. 2, April 2003).Google Scholar
Meagher, Niall P. Representing Developing Countries before the WTO: The Role of the Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL), EUI RSCAS Policy Paper 2015/02 (2015).Google Scholar
Meagher, Niall P. and Buencamino, Leah, The Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford University Press, 2019) https://bit.ly/3aPovuA.Google Scholar
Meagher, Niall P. and Buencamino, Leah Legal Remedies and Effective Compliance, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 197–210 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio, Preparing for a WTO Dispute Settlement Resolution Proceeding: The Decision-Making Process, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 7–22 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio The Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process, 6 Global Trade and Customs Journal 325–38 (No. 7/8, July 2011).Google Scholar
Monnier, Pierre, The Time to Comply with an Adverse WTO Ruling, 35 Journal of World Trade 825 (No. 5, October 2001).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A., “Inducing Compliance” in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 646 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. The WTO as a Legal System, 24 Fordham International Law Journal 444 (November–December 2000).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. The WTO Appellate Body Needs Remand Authority, 32 Journal of World Trade 51 (No. 1, February 1998).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. The WTO Appellate Body’s First Decision, 9 Leiden Journal of International Law 337 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. Section 337 and the WTO Agreements: Still in Violation?, 20 World Competition No. 1 (September 1996).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir A. A Commentary on the WTO Anti-Dumping Code, 30 Journal of World Trade 43 (No. 4, August 1996).Google Scholar
Parcero Herrera, Tania and Pereyra, María J., The Role and Assistance of the WTO Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects Of WTO Litigation 63–86 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?, 95 American Journal of International Law 535 (April 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach, 94 American Journal of International Law 535 (April 2000).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 227 (1998).Google Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi, How Much Time Is Reasonable – The Arbitral Decisions Under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU, 26 Berkeley Journal of International Law 323–51 (No. 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, The Dispute Settlement of the World Trade Organization and the Evolution of the GATT Dispute Settlement System Since 1948, 31 Common Market Law Review 1157 (1994).Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich Dispute Settlement Proceedings in the Field of Antidumping Law, 28 Common Market Law Review 69 (1991).Google Scholar
Piérola, Fernando, Reflections on Selected DSU Review Proposals Having an Impact on the Functioning of the WTO Dispute Settlement System, in Streatfield, Jeremy and Lacey, Simon (eds.), New Reflections On International Trade: Essays On Agriculture, WTO Accession, And Systemic Issues 169–97 (Cameron May, 2008).Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A., Judges’ Writing Styles (And Do They Matter?), 2 University of Chicago Law Review 1421, 1447 (1995).Google Scholar
Porges, Amelia, Step by Step to an International Trade Court, in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 496 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Quick, Reinhard, Trade, Environment and the Role of NGOs, 4 Journal of World Intellectual Property 281 (No. 4, March 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, Frieder and Gappah, Petina, A Re-Appraisal of Non-Violation Complaints under the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures, in McRory, Patrick F. J., Appleton, Arthur E., and Plummer, Michael G. (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic, And Political Analysis, Vol. 1 (Springer, 2005), 1371–87.Google Scholar
Roessler, Frieder, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Roessler, Frieder The concept of nullification and impairment in the legal system of the World Trade Organization, in International Trade Law And The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, Studies in Transnational Economic Law, Volume 11 (ed. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich ) 123–42 (Kluwer Law International, 1997).Google Scholar
Roessler, Frieder Changes in the Jurisprudence of the WTO Appellate Body During the Past Twenty Years, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/72.Google Scholar
de Scitovsky, Tibor, A Reconsideration of Theory of Tariffs (1942), in Papers on welfare and growth 139 (Allen & Unwin, 1964).Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N., The International Court of Justice: A Practical Perspective, 46 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 831–65 (2008).Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N. A Practical Look at the International Court of Justice, in Evans, Malcolm (ed.), Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma 13 (Hart, 1998).Google Scholar
Shoyer, Andrew W., Panel Selection in WTO Proceedings, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 203 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Srinivasan, T. N., Nondiscrimination in GATT/WTO: Was There Anything to Begin with and Is There Anything Left? 4 World Trade Review 69–95 (No. 1, 2005).Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance? in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 347 (Wolters Kluwer, 2000).Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Yasuhei, Understanding the Concept of Prima Facie Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Janow, Merit E., Donaldson, Victoria, and Yanovich, Alan (eds.), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement And Developing Countries 553 (Juris Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Tarullo, Daniel K., The Relationship of WTO Obligations to Other International Arrangements, in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 155 (Wolters Kluwer, 2000).Google Scholar
Thomas, J. C., The Need for Due Process in WTO Proceedings, 31 Journal of World Trade 45 (No. 1, February 1997).Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., The Domain of WTO Dispute Settlement, 40 Harvard International Law Journal 333 (Spring, 1999).Google Scholar
Unterhalter, David, The Authority of an Institution: The Appellate Body under Review, in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law And Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System 466–75 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Unterhalter, David The Burden of Proof in Dispute Settlement in Janow, Merit E., Donaldson, Victoria, and Yanovich, Alan (eds.), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement And Developing Countries 543 (Juris Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Valles, Cherise M., Different Forms of Expert Involvement in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, 9 Journal OF International Dispute Settlement 367–78 (No. 3, September 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valles, Cherise M. and McGivern, Brendan P., The Right to Retaliate under the WTO Agreement: The “Sequencing” Problem, 34 Journal of World Trade 63 (No. 2, 2000).Google Scholar
Van Damme, Isabelle, Preliminary Challenges and Rulings, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio (ed.), Practical Aspects Of WTO Litigation 257–300 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Vidigal, Geraldo, Awarding Damages or Demanding Performance? A Performance-Oriented Approach for International Investment Law, FGV DIREITO SP Research Paper Series n. 109 (ISSN 2358-1565) (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voon, Tania and Yanovich, Alan, The Facts Aside: The Limitation of WTO Appeals to Issues of Law, 40 Journal of World Trade 239–58 (No. 2, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasescha, Luzius, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H., The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement, 35 Journal of World Trade 191 (No. 2, April 2001).Google Scholar
Williams, Peter, Law and Lawyers in the Multilateral Trading System: Back to the Future, in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO 85 (Cambridge University Press and the WTO, 2015).Google Scholar
Yanguas, Tatiana, Determining the Reasonable Period of Time for Compliance, in Molina Tejeda, Marco Tulio, Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation 153–74 (Wolters Kluwer, 2020).Google Scholar
Zonnekeyn, Geert A., The Appellate Body’s Communication on Amicus Curiae Briefs in the Asbestos Case, 35 Journal of World Trade 553 (No. 3, June 2001).Google Scholar