Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:10:01.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 25 - Child abuse and the law I: general issues for the radiologist

from Section IV - Diagnostic imaging of abuse in societal context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Sandeep K. Narang
Affiliation:
Director, Child Abuse Fellowship at the Division of Child Protection, Department of Pediatrics, CARE Center and Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
Paul K. Kleinman
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital Boston
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Child abuse is one of those unique realms where medicine and law are strange, but routine, bed fellows. Thus, it is incumbent upon physicians involved in the detection of child abuse and neglect to have some familiarity with the law. Physicians involved in child abuse cases often encounter a variety of issues that entail legal questions – patient consent, appropriate documentation, reporting child abuse, potential liability, privilege, and confidentiality. Despite questions about the law and the need for legal understanding, doctors often greet lawyers with a sense of anxiety, if not resentment. And, with concurrent dismay, attorneys sometimes resent what they perceive as a medical lack of cooperation with the legal process. However, the test of time has borne out that the sensitive management of family violence cases requires both professional spouses to not only communicate, but to get along (1).

It is not uncommon, if not the norm now, for hospitals and communities to have multidisciplinary child abuse-assessment teams who specialize in the assessment of suspected victims of abuse (2). Common participants of multidisciplinary child abuse-assessment teams include pediatricians, radiologists, ophthalmologists, surgeons, social workers, and mental health providers. Additionally, hospitals are not the only institutions that become involved. The thorough multidisciplinary management of child abuse cases includes police departments, district attorneys' offices, courts, and protective service agencies. Although child abuse laws are sometimes vague and poorly defined, there are three basic issues for the medical professional to consider:

  1. When should the state intervene (e.g., is there a need to file a child abuse/neglect report) (3)?

  2. How should the state intervene (e.g., what protective measures should protective agencies implement to ensure the safety of the child, and, what criminal charges, if any, should the state pursue against the alleged perpetrators)?

  3. What legal requirements impact the physician's professional responsibility to the patient and the state (e.g., how should one document abuse in the medical record, and how do laws, such as HIPAA, impact medical record sharing with third parties, such as protective service agencies and attorneys)?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drake, JA. Physicians and attorneys: a partnership on behalf of the youngest victims of family violence. Md Med J. 1997;43:365–7.Google Scholar
Kellogg, N and the Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):1232–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourne, R, Newberger, EH. Family autonomy or coercive intervention? Ambiguity and conflict in the proposed standards for child abuse and neglect. Boston U Law Rev. 1977;57(4):670–706.Google Scholar
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 NY 125, 105 NE 92 (1914).
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 1995;95(2):314–17.Google Scholar
Legal Information Institute. Emancipation of Minors – Laws. Available from .
FindLaw. Emancipation of Minors Basics. Available from .
Legal Information Institute. Emancipation of Minors. Available from .
Driggs, A. The mature minor doctrine: do adolescents have the right to die?Health Matrix. 2001;11:687–718.Google ScholarPubMed
Connor, C. What rights do minors have to refuse medical treatment?JLGH. 2009;4(2):63–5.Google Scholar
Shine v. Vega, 709 NE2d 58 (Mass 1999).
Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 US 158 (1944).
Boonstra, H, Nash, E. Minors and the Right to Consent to Health Care. The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy. 2000;4–8. Available from .
Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Child abuse, confidentiality, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Pediatrics. 2010;125;197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Section 160.203[c].
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Section 164.512[c].
42 CFR 482.26(d).
AHIMA. Retention and Destruction of Health Information. Available from .
Child Welfare Information Gateway. Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect. Available from .
Child Welfare Information Gateway. Penalties for Failure to Report and False Reporting of Child Abuse and Neglect. Available from .
Jones, R, Flaherty, E, Binns, HJ, Price, LL, Slora, E, Abney, D, et al. Clinicians' description of factors influencing their reporting of suspected child abuse: report of the Child Abuse Reporting Experience Study Research Group. Pediatrics. 2008;122:611–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, BH, Brown, G. Reasonable suspicion: a study of Pennsylvania pediatricians regarding child abuse. Pediatrics. 2005;116(1):e5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000).
State v. Hurd, 135 Wisc. 2d 266 (1986).
Landeros v. Flood, 131 Calif. Rptr. 69 (1976).
Brown, JL. Responsibilities and risks when radiologists evaluate patients for child abuse. AJR. 2013;200(5):948–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draper v. Westerfield, 181 S.W.3d 283 (2005).
Jenny, C, Hymel, KP, Ritzen, A, Reinert, SE, Hay, TC. Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA. 1999;281(7):621–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Guideline for Communicating of Diagnostic Imaging Findings (Res. 11). American College of Radiology: ACR Standards. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2010.Google Scholar
Lane, W, Rubin, DM, Monteith, R, Christian, CW. Racial differences in the evaluation of pediatric fractures for physical abuse. JAMA. 2002;288:1603–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×