Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T12:25:54.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Musculoskeletal system

from Part II - Empirical analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

John William Prothero
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Design of Mammals
A Scaling Approach
, pp. 142 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R.McN. (1985). The maximum forces exerted by animals. Journal of Experimental Biology, 115:231238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omura, H., Ohsumi, S., Nemoto, T., Nasu, K. and Kasuya, T. (1969). Black right whales in the North Pacific. Scientific Reports of Whales Research Institute, 21:178.Google Scholar
Harris, A.J., Duxson, M.J., Butler, J.E. et al. (2005). Muscle fiber and motor unit behaviour in the longest human skeletal muscle. Journal of Neuroscience, 25:85288533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackerman, E. (1962). Biophysical Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, H.E. (1958). The contraction of muscle. Scientific American, 199:6682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, T.A.J. (1999). Molecular model of muscle contraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96:27702775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, G.F. and Padykula, H.A. (1966). Cytological studies of fiber types in skeletal muscle. A comparative study of the mammalian diaphragm. Journal of Cell Biology, 28:333354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, E.R. and Beattie, A.W. (1973). Variation in muscle fibre diameter among sections and intrasections and between contralateral muscles in seven bovine muscles. Journal of Agricultural Science, 81:914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagnani, S. and De Rosa, P. (1989). Morphofunctional features of human extrinsic ocular muscles. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 72:119128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockhart, R.D. and Brandt, W. (1938). Length of striated muscle-fibers. Journal of Anatomy, 70:470.Google Scholar
Pollock, C.M. and Shadwick, R.E. (1994). Allometry of muscle, tendon, and elastic energy storage capacity in mammals. American Journal of Physiology, 266:R1022R1031.Google ScholarPubMed
Munro, H.N. (1969). Evolution of protein metabolism in mammals. In: Munro, H.N. (ed.) Mammalian Protein Metabolism. New York: Academic Press, pp. 133182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheek, D.B., Powell, G.K., Scott, R.E. et al. (1965). Growth of muscle mass and skeletal collagen in the rat. I. Normal growth. Bulletin Johns Hopkins Hospital, 116:378387.Google ScholarPubMed
Blackfan, K.D. (ed.) (1933). White House Conference on Child Health and Protection: Part II. Anatomy and Physiology. New York: Century Company.Google Scholar
Currey, J.D. (1987). The evolution of the mechanical properties of amniote bone. Journal of Biomechanics, 20:10351044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruben, J.A. and Bennett, A.A. (1987). The evolution of bone. Evolution, 4:11871197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, H.M. (1961). Measurements of the diffusion pathway between osteocyte lacuna and blood. Henry Ford Hospital Medical Bulletin, 9:137144.Google ScholarPubMed
Copp, D.H. and Shim, S.S. (1965). Extraction ratio and bone clearance of Sr85 as a measure of effective bone blood flow. Circulation Research, 16:461467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganong, W.F. (1965). Review of Medical Physiology. Los Altos, CA: Lange Medical Publications.Google Scholar
Yamada, H. (1970). Strength of Biological Materials. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Co.Google Scholar
Martin, R.B. (2007). The importance of mechanical loading in bone biology and medicine. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions, 7:4853.Google ScholarPubMed
Wall, W.P. (1983). The correlation between high limb-bone density and aquatic habits in recent mammals. Journal of Paleontology, 57:197207.Google Scholar
Godfrey, L., Sutherland, M., Boy, D. and Gomberg, N. (1991). Scaling of limb joint surface areas in anthropoid primates and other mammals. Journal of Zoology, 223:603625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prange, H.D., Anderson, J.F. and Rahn, H. (1979). Scaling of skeletal mass to body mass in birds and mammals. American Naturalist, 113:103122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crile, G. (1941). Intelligence, Power and Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill. (Data for the skeletal mass of an elephant were not found in this work.)Google Scholar
Quiring, D.P. (1939). Notes on an African elephant (Loxodonta africana). Growth, 3:913. (The mass of the skeleton (1,238 lbs) given in this work is only 8% of body mass (14,640 lbs). The skeleton had been left to “weather” for 10 days in Tanganyika before weighing.)Google Scholar
Martin, A.W. and Fuhrman, F.A. (1955). The relationship between summated tissue respiration and metabolic rate in the mouse and dog. Physiological Zoology, 28:1834. (Skeletal mass for an African elephant is given as 27% of body mass. The specific values for body, kidney, and liver masses suggest this is the same elephant as discussed by Quiring (see Reference [26]), except that 8% for skeletal mass has become 27%. Perhaps someone inadvertently took the body mass of this elephant to be 4,640 lbs rather than 14,640 lbs (100*1238/4640 = 27)?)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, C. and Heusner, A.A. (1964). Étude comparative du métabolism énergétique dans la série animale. Journal Physiologie, Paris 56:489524.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1975). Scaling in biology: the consequences of size. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 194 :287307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J.F., Range, H. and Prange, H.D (1979). Scaling of supportive tissue mass. Quarterly Review Biology, 54 :139148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiring, D.P. (1943). Weight data on five whales. Journal of Mammalogy, 24:3945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, W.C. (1950). The largest whale ever weighed. Natural History, 59:392398.Google Scholar
Krogman, W.M. (1941). Growth of Man. Tabulae Biologicae, 20:1963.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (1947). Researches on Pre-Natal Life. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Prothero, J. (1995). Bone and fat as a function of body weight in adult mammals.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 111A:633639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galilei, G. (1954). Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
McMahon, T.A. (1975). Using body size to understand the structural design of animals: quadrupedal locomotion. Journal of Applied Physiology, 39:619627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1970). Energy metabolism, body size, and problems of scaling. Federation Proceedings, 29:15241532.Google ScholarPubMed
Alexander, R.McN., Jayes, A.S., Maloiy, G.M.O. and Wathuta, E.M. (1979). Allometry of the limb bones of mammals from shrews (Sorex) to elephant (Loxodonta). Journal of Zoology, 189:305314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, J.E.A. and Biewener, A.A. (1990). Differential scaling of the long bones in the terrestrial carnivora and other mammals. Journal of Morphology, 204:157169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, G.J.M. and da Silva, J.K.L. (2006). Interspecific allometry of bone dimensions: a review of theoretical models. Physics of Life Reviews, 3:188209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biewener, A.A. (2005). Biomechanical consequences of scaling. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208:16651676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currey, J.D. and Alexander, R.McN. (1985). The thickness of the walls of tubular bones.Journal of Zoology, 206A:453468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×