Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-558cb97cc8-zs4qr Total loading time: 1.345 Render date: 2022-10-06T08:52:01.754Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2021

Andrew T. Kenyon
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne School of Law
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Democracy of Expression
Positive Free Speech and Law
, pp. 247 - 271
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalberg, Toril and Curran, James (eds.), How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach (New York: Routledge 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H and Bartels, Larry M, Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, Means Without End: Notes on Politics (translated by Vincenzo Binetti and Cesare Casarino) (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2000).Google Scholar
Ala-Fossi, Marko, ‘Finland: Media Welfare State in the Digital Era?’ (2020) 11 Journal of Digital Media and Policy 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ala-Fossi, Marko, Alén-Savikko, Anette, Hilden, Jockum et al., ‘Operationalising Communication Rights: The Case of a “Digital Welfare State”’ (2019) 8(1) Internet Policy Review, http://policyreview.info.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albornoz, Luis A and García Leiva, Ma Trinidad (eds.), Audiovisual Industries and Diversity: Economics and Policies in the Digital Era (New York: Routledge 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (translated by Julian Rivers) (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002).Google Scholar
Alexy, RobertComments and Responses’ in Matthias, Klatt (ed.), Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 319–56.Google Scholar
Allan, TRS, The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and Common Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Douglas, ‘Relocating the Press: Toward a More Positive Notion of “Freedom of the Press”’ (2015) 9 International Journal of Communication 3422–31.Google Scholar
Ammori, Marvin, ‘First Amendment Architecture’ [2012] Wisconsin Law Review 183.Google Scholar
Amos, Merris, Canto-Lopez, Maribel and Reventlow, Nani Jansen, ‘Ruusunen v. Finland’ in Hodson, Loveday and Lavers, Troy (eds.), Feminist Judgments in International Law (Oxford: Hart 2019) 303–30.Google Scholar
Ananny, Mike, Networked Press Freedom: Creating Infrastructures for a Public Right to Hear (Cambridge MA: MIT Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananny, Mike ‘Tech Platforms Are Where Public Life Is Increasingly Constructed, and Their Motivations Are Far From Neutral’, NiemanLab, 10 October 2019, https://bit.ly/2V63uE4.Google Scholar
Andrejevic, Mark, ‘Automating Surveillance’ (2019) 17 Surveillance and Society 713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrejevic, Mark Automated Media (New York: Routledge 2020).Google Scholar
Andrejevic, MarkData Civics: A Response to the “Ethical Turn”’ (2020) 21 Television and New Media 5627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, Gabrielle and Dixon, Rosalind (eds.), The Critical Judgments Project: Re-Reading Monis v. The Queen (Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press 2016).Google Scholar
Arriaza Ibarra, Karen, ‘Management and Organization of Public Service Media Companies: Basic Concepts Related to Efficiency and Failure in European Public Service Media, with Two Case Examples (Germany and Spain)’ in Ibarra, Karen Arriaza, Nowak, Eva and Kuhn, Raymond (eds.), Public Service Media in Europe: A Comparative Approach (Abingdon: Routledge 2015) 147–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Article 19, Statement on the Right to Communicate (2003) https://bit.ly/3fDQ8Zg.Google Scholar
Bakan, Joel, Just Words: Constitutional Rights and Social Wrongs (Toronto: University of Toronto Press 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C Edwin, Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech (New York: Oxford University Press 1989).Google Scholar
Baker, C EdwinAdvertising and a Democratic Press’ (1992) 140 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2097243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C Edwin Media, Markets, and Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002).Google Scholar
Baker, C Edwin Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M, ‘Some Realism about Pluralism: Legal Realist Approaches to the First Amendment’ [1990] Duke Law Journal 375430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack M (ed.), What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation’s Top Legal Experts Rewrite America’s Landmark Civil Rights Decisions (New York: New York University Press 2002).Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack MDigital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society’ (2004) 79 New York University Law Review 158.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack MHow Rights Change: Freedom of Speech in the Digital Era’ (2004) 26 Sydney Law Review 516.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack MMedia Access: A Question of Design’ (2008) 76 George Washington Law Review 933-951Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack MThe Future of Free Expression in a Digital Age’ (2009) 36 Pepperdine Law Review 427–44.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack MThe First Amendment Is an Information Policy’ (2012) 41 Hofstra Law Review 130.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack MOld-School/New-School Speech Regulation’ (2014) 127 Harvard Law Review 2296–342.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack MCultural Democracy and the First Amendment’ (2016) 110 Northwestern University Law Review 1053–95.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack MFree Speech in the Algorithmic Society: Big Data, Private Governance, and New School Speech Regulation’ (2018) 51 UC Davis Law Review 1149–210.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack MFree Speech Is a Triangle’ (2018) 118 Columbia Law Review 2011–55.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan, ‘The Negative Constitution: A Critique’ (1990) 88 Michigan Law Review 2271–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (Berkeley: University of California Press 1984).Google Scholar
Barber, NW, ‘Constitutionalism: Negative and Positive’ (2015) 38 Dublin University Law Journal 249–64.Google Scholar
Barber, NW The Principles of Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barendt, Eric, ‘The Influence of the German and Italian Constitutional Courts on Their National Broadcasting Systems’ [1991] Public Law 93115.Google Scholar
Barendt, Eric Freedom of Speech (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Barendt, EricFreedom of Expression’ in Michel, Rosenfeld and András, Sajó (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 891908.Google Scholar
Barron, Jerome A, ‘Access to the Press: A New First Amendment Right’ (1967) 80 Harvard Law Review 1641–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, Jerome A Freedom of the Press for Whom? The Right of Access to Mass Media (Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, Jerome A Public Rights and the Private Press (Toronto: Butterworths 1981).Google Scholar
Barwise, Patrick and Picard, Robert G, What If There Were No BBC Television? The Net Impact on UK Viewers (Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, Peter, Social Evolution, Political Psychology, and the Media in Democracy: The Invisible Hand in the US Marketplace of Ideas (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, John, French Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1992).Google Scholar
Bell, John, Boyron, Sophie and Whitaker, Simon, Principles of French Law (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard, Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise (London: Routledge 1999).Google Scholar
Bellamy, Richard Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkler, Yochai, Faris, Robert and Roberts, Hal, Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Thomas DC, ‘Commentary on AAA v. Associated Newspapers Ltd’ in Stalford, Helen, Hollingsworth, Kathryn and Gilmore, Stephen (eds.), Rewriting Children’s Rights Judgments: From Academic Vision to New Practice (Oxford: Hart 2017) 1939.Google Scholar
Benson, Rodney, ‘The Political Shaping of the Media’ (2005) 46 European Journal of Sociology 541–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, RodneyShaping the Public Sphere: Habermas and Beyond’ (2009) 40 American Sociologist 175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Rodney Shaping Immigration News: A French-American Comparison (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, RodneyThe New American Media Landscape’ in Aeron, Davis (ed.), The Death of Public Knowledge? How Free Markets Destroy the General Intellect (London: Goldsmiths Press 2017) 6985.Google Scholar
Benson, RodneyCan Foundations Solve the Journalism Crisis?’ (2018) 19 Journalism 105977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benthall, Sebastian and Goldenfein, Jake, ‘Data Science and the Decline of Liberal Law and Ethics’, Ethics of Data Science Conference (Sydney 2020).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, Two Concepts of Liberty: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958 (Oxford: Clarendon 1958).Google Scholar
Berlin, IsaiahIntroduction’ in Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1969) ixlxiii.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah Liberty: Incorporating ‘Four Essays on Liberty (edited by Henry Hardy) (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, Paul, ‘Fakebook: Why Facebook Makes the Fake News Problem Inevitable’ (2018) 69 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 513–30.Google Scholar
Bhagwat, Ashutosh, Our Democratic First Amendment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwat, Ashutosh and Weinstein, James, ‘Freedom of Expression and Democracy’ in Stone, Adrienne and Schauer, Frederick (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021) 82105.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Gautam, Offend, Shock, or Disturb: Free Speech under the Indian Constitution (New Delhi: Oxford University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Adrian, ‘Against Positive and Negative Freedom’ (2004) 32 Political Theory 547–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokland, Hans, Freedom and Culture in Western Society (translated by Michael O’Loughlin) (London: Routledge 1997).Google Scholar
Bollinger, Lee C, ‘Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation’ (1976) 75 Michigan Law Review 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, Georgina, ‘Digitising Democracy’ (2005) 76 (Supplement 1) Political Quarterly 102–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard, The Philosophical Theory of the State (London: Macmillan 1899).Google Scholar
Bourgeois, Isabelle, ‘Les médias dans l’Allemagne unie: De l’unification démocratique à la normalisation du marché’ (2010) no. 98–9 Regards sur l’économie allemande 6378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boym, Svetlana, Another Freedom: The Alternative History of an Idea (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyron, Sophie, The Constitution of France: A Contextual Analysis (Oxford: Hart 2013).Google Scholar
Braddon-Mitchell, David and West, Caroline, ‘What Is Free Speech?’ (2004) 4 Journal of Political Philosophy 43760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braman, Sandra, Change of State: Information, Policy, and Power (Cambridge MA: MIT Press 2006).Google Scholar
Braman, SandraThe Limits of Diversity’ in Napoli, Philip M (ed.), Media Diversity and Localism: Meaning and Metrics (Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum 2007) 13950.Google Scholar
Brenkert, George G, Political Freedom (London: Routledge 1991).Google Scholar
Brettschneider, Corey, When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? How Democracies Can Protect Expression and Promote Equality (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen, Active Liberty: Interpreting a Democratic Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Brogi, Elda, Bania, Konstantina, Nenadic, Iva, Ostling, Alina and Parcu, Pier Luigi, Monitoring Media Pluralism in Europe: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor 2016 in the European Union, Montenegro and Turkey (Florence: Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, European University Institute 2017).Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom, (ed.), Justice and the Capabilities Approach (Farnham: Ashgate 2012).Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy, Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution (New York: Zone Books 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Donald R, Comparing Broadcast Systems: The Experiences of Six Industrialized Nations (Ames: Iowa State University Press 1989).Google Scholar
Broyelle, Camille and Franceschini, Laurence, Droit de la régulation audiovisuelle (LGDJ: Paris 2020).Google Scholar
Brüggemann, Michael, Engesser, Sven, Büchel, Florin, Humprecht, Edda and Castro, Laia, ‘Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems’ (2014) 64 Journal of Communication 1037–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunet, Pierre, ‘La démocratie entre essence et expérience: Réponse à Dominique Rousseau’, La vie des idées, 9 October 2008, www.laviedesidees.fr/La-democratie-entre-essence-et.html.Google Scholar
Bruns, Axel, ‘Filter Bubble’ (2019) 8(4) Internet Policy Review; DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullinger, Martin, ‘Freedom of Expression and Information: An Essential Element of Democracy’ (1985) 28 German Yearbook of International Law 88143.Google Scholar
Bullinger, MartinThe Constitution and Communication’ in Starck, Christian (ed.), New Challenges to the German Basic Law: The German Contributions to the Third World Congress of the International Association of Constitutional Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1991) 4359.Google Scholar
Cagé, Julia, Sauver les médias: Capitalisme, financement participatif et démocratie (Paris: Seuil et La République des Idées 2015); translated as Saving the Media: Capitalism, Crowdfunding, and Democracy (translated by Arthur Goldhammer) (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Calliess, Christian, ‘Dimensions of Fundamental Rights: Duty to Respect versus Duty to Protect’ in Pünder, Hermann and Waldhoff, Christian (eds.), Debates in German Public Law (Oxford: Hart 2014) 2742.Google Scholar
Cammaerts, Bart, ‘Communication Freedoms versus Communication Rights: Discursive and Normative Struggles within Civil Society and Beyond’ in Tumber, Howard and Waisbord, Silvio (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Media and Human Rights (Abingdon: Routledge 2017) 50–9.Google Scholar
Cammaerts, Bart and Mansell, Robin, ‘Digital Platform Policy and Regulation: Toward a Radical Democratic Turn’ (2020) 14 International Journal of Communication 135–54.Google Scholar
Carolan, Eoin, ‘Ireland’s Constitutional Convention: Behind the Hype about Citizen-Led Constitutional Change’ (2015) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 733–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolan, EoinPromoting Civic Discourse: A Form of Positive Free Speech Under the Constitution of Ireland?’ in Kenyon, Andrew T and Andrew, Scott (eds.), Positive Free Speech: Rationales, Methods and Implications (Oxford: Hart 2020) 6581.Google Scholar
Carter, Ian, A Measure of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, Deborah Z, ‘Through the Looking Glass: The High Court of Australia and the Right to Political Speech’ in Campbell, Tom and Sadurski, Wojciech (eds.), Freedom of Communication (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1994) 179–98.Google Scholar
Chalaby, Jean K, ‘French Political Communication in a Comparative Perspective: The Media and the Issue of Freedom’ (2005) 13 Modern and Contemporary France 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Simone, ‘Deliberation and Mass Democracy’ in Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane (eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012) 5271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, SimoneReview of Honneth, Freedom’s Right’ (2016) 126 Ethics 505–9.Google Scholar
Charney, John, The Illusion of the Free Press (Oxford: Hart 2018).Google Scholar
Cheer, Ursula, ‘Commentary on Brooker v. Police: Rights Balancing Rejected’ in McDonald, Elisabeth, Powell, Rhonda, Stephens, Māmari and Hunter, Rosemary (eds.), Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand: Te Rino, A Two-Stranded Rope (Oxford: Hart 2017) 73–8.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Michael, Freedom of Speech in Australian Law: A Delicate Plant? (Aldershot: Ashgate 2000).Google Scholar
Chevallier, Jacques, ‘Réflexions sur la gouvernance du système audiovisuelle’ in Regourd, Serge and Calandri, Laurence (eds.), La régulation de la communication audiovisuelle: Enjeux et perspectives (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut Universitaire Varenne 2015) 375–87.Google Scholar
Chevigny, Paul, More Speech: Dialogue Rights and Modern Liberty (Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1988).Google Scholar
Christians, Clifford G, Glasser, Theodore L, McQuail, Denis, Nordenstreng, Kaarle and White, Robert A, Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies (Urbana: University of Illinois Press 2009).Google Scholar
Citron, Danielle Keats and Richards, Neil M, ‘Four Principles for Digital Expression (You Won’t Believe #3)’ (2018) 95 Washington University Law Review 1353–87.Google Scholar
Civicus Monitor, People Power Under Attack (December 2019) https://monitor.civicus.org.Google Scholar
Coe, Peter, ‘(Re)embracing Social Responsibility Theory as a Basis for Free Speech: Shifting the Normative Paradigm for a Modern Media’ (2018) 69 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 403–31.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald A, ‘Freedom and Money’ in Otsuka, Michael (ed.), On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2011) 166–92.Google Scholar
Cohen, Julie E, ‘Affording Fundamental Rights: A Provocation Inspired by Mireille Hildebrandt’ (2017) 4 Critical Analysis of Law 7890.Google Scholar
Cohen, Julie E Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism (New York: Oxford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collings, Justin, Democracy’s Guardians: A History of the German Federal Constitutional Court 1951–2001 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Richard, ‘Public Service Broadcasting and Freedom’ (1992) no. 66 Media Information Australia 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colón-Ríos, Joel I, Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power (Abingdon: Routledge 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comité de réflexion et de proposition sur la modernisation et le rééquilibrage des institutions de la Vᵉ République, Une Vᵉ République plus démocratique (chaired by Édouard Balladur) (Paris: La Documentation française 2008).Google Scholar
Commission on Freedom of the Press (Hutchins Commission), A Free and Responsible Press: A General Report of Mass Communication: Newspapers, Radio, Motion Pictures, Magazines, and Books (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1947).Google Scholar
Connolly, William E, The Terms of Political Discourse (3rd ed., Oxford: Blackwell 1993).Google Scholar
Cook, Timothy E, Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution (2nd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Glynn, Adam N et al. (eds.), Varieties of Democracy: Measuring Two Centuries of Political Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couldry, Nick, Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism (London: Sage 2010).Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick Media, Voice, Space and Power: Essays of Refraction (Abingdon: Routledge 2020).Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick Media: Why It Matters (Cambridge: Polity 2020).Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick and Mejias, Ulises A, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism (Stanford: Stanford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couldry, Nick and Turow, Joseph, ‘Advertising, Big Data, and the Clearance of the Public Realm: Marketers’ New Approaches to the Content Subsidy’ (2014) 8 International Journal of Communication 1710–26.Google Scholar
Cram, Ian, ‘Keeping the Demos out of Liberal Democracy? Participatory Politics, “Fake News” and the Online Speaker’ (2019) 11 Journal of Media Law 113–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craufurd Smith, Rachael, Broadcasting Law and Fundamental Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1997).Google Scholar
Crocker, Lawrence, Positive Liberty: An Essay in Normative Political Philosophy (Melbourne International Philosophy Series vol. 7) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, Colin, Post-Democracy (Cambridge: Polity 2004).Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism (Cambridge: Polity 2011).Google Scholar
Curran, James, ‘Mass Media and Democracy Revisited’ in Curran, James and Gurevitch, Michael (eds.), Mass Media and Society (2nd ed., New York: St Martin’s Press 1996) 82117.Google Scholar
Curran, James Media and Power (London: Routledge 2002).Google Scholar
Curran, JamesMediations of Democracy’ in Curran, James and Gurevitch, Michael (eds.), Mass Media and Society (4th ed., London: Hodder Arnold 2005) 122–49.Google Scholar
Curtis, Michael Kent, ‘Democratic Ideals and Media Realities: A Puzzling Free Press Paradox’ (2004) 21 Social Philosophy and Policy 385427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curty, Gaël, ‘Capitalism, Critique and Social Freedom: An Interview with Axel Honneth on Freedom’s Right’ (2020) 46 Critical Sociology 1339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushion, Stephen, The Democratic Value of News: Why Public Service Media Matter (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A, Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press 1989).Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A On Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press 1998).Google Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter, Television and the Public Sphere: Citizenship, Democracy and the Media (London: Sage 1995).Google Scholar
Danbury, Richard, ‘Where Should Speech Be Free? Placing Liberal Theories of Free Speech in a Wider Context’ in Price, Monroe and Stremlau, Nicole (eds.), Speech and Society in Turbulent Times: Freedom of Expression in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018) 171–91.Google Scholar
Dankwa, Victor, Flinterman, Cees and Leckie, Scott, ‘Commentary on the Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ (1998) 20 Human Rights Quarterly 705–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Simon, ‘Press Freedom, Privacy and the Public Sphere’ (2014) 15 Journalism Studies 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bellescize, Diane and Franceschini, Laurence, Droit de la communication (2nd ed., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 2011).Google Scholar
de Montalivet, Pierre, ‘Les objectifs de valeur constitutionnelle’ (2006) 20 Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, available via www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr.Google Scholar
de Montalivet, Pierre La Constitution et l’audiovisuel (2012) 36 Nouveaux Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel 717.Google Scholar
de Visser, Maartje, Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford: Hart 2014)Google Scholar
Debbasch, Charles, ‘Préface’ in Marcangelo-Leos, Philie, Pluralisme et audiovisuel (Paris: LGDJ 2004) v–viii.Google Scholar
Del Campo, Agustina, ‘Current Trends in Argentina’s Freedom of Expression Jurisprudence’ (2 May 2014) available via https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, ‘First Amendment Formalism is Giving Way to First Amendment Legal Realism’ (1994) 29 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 169–74.Google Scholar
Derieux, Emmanuel, ‘Missions et gouvernance de l’audiovisuel public: Spécificités du secteur public?’ in Regourd, Serge and Calandri, Laurence (eds.), La régulation de la communication audiovisuelle: Enjeux et perspectives (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut Universitaire Varenne 2015) 343–57.Google Scholar
Derieux, EmmanuelLiberté, pluralisme et indépendance des médias’ (2016) no. 344 Légipresse 682–6.Google Scholar
Derieux, Emmanuel Droit des médias: Droit français, européen et international (8th ed., Issy-les-Moulineaux: LGDJ 2018).Google Scholar
Derieux, EmmanuelRevendication d’un droit de participation de diverses formations politiques à un débat télévisé’ (2019) no. 371 Légipresse 296.Google Scholar
Derieux, Emmanuel with Agnès Granchet, Droit des médias: Droit français, européen et international (7th ed., Issy-les-Moulineaux: LGDJ 2015).Google Scholar
Dewey, John, The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry (New York: Henry Holt 1927).Google Scholar
Docquir, Pierre-François, Müller, Sebastian and Gusy, Christoph, ‘Does the Complexity of Institutional Structures in Federal States Influence the Independence of AVM Regulatory Authorities? A Review of the Cases of Germany and Belgium’ in Schulz, Wolfgang, Valcke, Peggy and Irion, Kristina (eds.), The Independence of the Media and Its Regulatory Agencies: Shedding New Light on Formal and Actual Independence Against the National Context (Bristol: Intellect 2013) 249–87.Google Scholar
Dörr, Dieter, ‘The Federal Constitutional Court’s ZDF Ruling and Its Consequences’ (1 November 2016) available via Friends of Canadian Broadcasting https://bit.ly/2V3DlGb.Google Scholar
Drago, Roland, ‘General Introduction’ in Bermann, George A and Picard, Etienne (eds.), Introduction to French Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law 2012) xxixxl.Google Scholar
Dreyer, Emmanuel, Droit de la communication (Paris: LexisNexis 2018).Google Scholar
Durham, W Cole, ‘General Assessment of the Basic Law: An American View’ in Kirchhof, Paul and Kommers, Donald P (eds.), Germany and Its Basic Law: Past, Present and Future (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1993) 3763.Google Scholar
Edström, Maria, Kenyon, Andrew T and Svensson, Eva-Maria (eds.), Blurring the Lines: Market-Driven and Democracy-Driven Freedom of Expression (Gothenburg: Nordicom 2016).Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Emerson, Thomas I, The System of Freedom of Expression (New York: Random House 1970)Google Scholar
Emerson, Thomas IThe Affirmative Side of the First Amendment’ (1981) 15 Georgia Law Review 795849.Google Scholar
Etzioni-Halevy, Eva, National Broadcasting Under Siege: A Comparative Study of Australia, Britain, Israel and West Germany (Basingstoke: Macmillan 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eule, Julian N, ‘Promoting Speaker Diversity: Austin and Metro Broadcasting’ [1990] Supreme Court Review 105132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, Richard H Jr, ‘Two Senses of Autonomy’ (1994) 46 Stanford Law Review 875905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Johan and Schou, Jannick, Post-Truth, Fake News and Democracy: Mapping the Politics of Falsehood (Abingdon: Routledge 2020).Google Scholar
Favoreu, Louis and Mastor, Wanda, Les cours constitutionelles (2nd ed., Paris: Dalloz 2016).Google Scholar
Favoreu, Louis and Philip, Loïc, Les grandes décisions du Conseil constitutionnel (7th ed., Paris: Dalloz 1993).Google Scholar
Fawcett, Edmund, Liberalism: The Life of an Idea (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Fenton, Natalie, ‘Defending Whose Democracy? Media Freedom and Media Power’ (2014) 35 (special issue) Nordicom Review 3143.Google Scholar
Fenton, NatalieFake Democracy: The Limits of Public Sphere Theory’ (2018) 25 Javnost: The Public 2834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, Natalie and Freedman, Des, ‘Fake Democracy, Bad News’ in Panitch, Leo and Albo, Greg (eds.), Rethinking Democracy: Socialist Register 2018 (London: Merlin Press 2017) 130–50.Google Scholar
Fenton, Natalie and Titley, Gavan, ‘Mourning and Longing: Media Studies Learning to Let Go of Liberal Democracy’ (2015) 30 European Journal of Communication 554–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, Helen and Phillipson, Gavin, ‘Covert Derogations and Judicial Deference: Redefining Liberty and Due Process Rights in Counter-Terrorism Law and Beyond’ (2011) 56 McGill Law Journal 864918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, Gamson, William Anthony, Gerhards, Jürgen and Rucht, Dieter, Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiss, Owen, The Irony of Free Speech (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 1996).Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard E, The Philosophy and Politics of Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1987).Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin, Freedom: Contemporary Liberal Perspectives (Cambridge: Polity 2007).Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent, Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice (translated by Steven Sampson) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1998).Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Sébastien, ‘Aides à la presse, un scandale qui dure’, Le Monde diplomatique, November 2014, 22–3.Google Scholar
Foster, Nigel G and Sule, Satish, German Legal System and Laws (4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983 (edited by Frédéric Gros; translated by Graham Burchell) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’ (1990) nos. 25/26 Social Text 5680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredman, Sandra, Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredman, Sandra Comparative Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Des, ‘Media Policy Silences: The Hidden Face of Communications Decision Making’ (2010) 15 International Journal of Press/Politics 344–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Des and Schlosberg, Justin, ‘Conclusion: Manifesto for Public Knowledge’ in Davis, Aeron (ed.), The Death of Public Knowledge? How Free Markets Destroy the General Intellect (London: Goldsmiths Press 2017) 243–9.Google Scholar
Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2020: A Leaderless Struggle for Democracy (Washington: Freedom House 2020).Google Scholar
Fromont, Michel, Justice constitutionnelle comparée (Paris: Dalloz 2013).Google Scholar
Gaïa, Patrick, Ghevontian, Richard, Mélin-Soucramanien, Ferdinand, Oliva, Éric and Roux, André, Les grandes décisions du Conseil constitutionnel (16th ed., Paris: Dalloz 2016).Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen, ‘Positive and Horizontal Rights: Proportionality’s Next Frontier or a Bridge Too Far?’ in Jackson, Vicki C and Tushnet, Mark (eds.), Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017) 221–47.Google Scholar
Garnham, Nicholas, ‘Amartya Sen’s “Capabilities” Approach to the Evaluation of Welfare: Its Application to Communications’ (1997) 4(4) Javnost: The Public 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearty, Conor, ‘Against Judicial Enforcement’ in Gearty, Conor and Mantouvalou, Virginia, Debating Social Rights (Oxford: Hart 2011).Google Scholar
Geisler, Michael and Mattson, Michelle, ‘Introduction: After the Bardic Era – German Television Since 1984’ (1999) no. 78 New German Critique 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelber, Katharine, ‘Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach and Freedom of Speech’ in Panzironi, Francesca and Gelber, Katharine (eds.), The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region (Abingdon: Routledge 2012) 3851.Google Scholar
Gelber, KatharineReconceptualizing Counterspeech in Hate Speech Policy (with a Focus on Australia)’ in Michael, Herz and Peter, Molnar (eds.), The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012) 198209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelber, Katharine“Speaking Back”: The Likely Fate of Hate Speech Policy in the United States and Australia’ in Maitra, Ishani and Mary McGowan, Kate (eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 5071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelber, KatharineCommentary on McLeod v. Power’ in Douglas, Heather, Bartlett, Francesca, Luker, Trish and Hunter, Rosemary (eds.), Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law (Oxford: Hart 2014) 405–8.Google Scholar
Gewirth, Alan, Human Rights: Essays on Justification and Applications (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1982).Google Scholar
Ghevontian, Richard, ‘Le Conseil constitutionnel, juge électoral et la liberté d’expression’ (2012) no. 36 Nouveaux Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel 4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Thomas, ‘Freedom of the Press: Ownership and Editorial Values’ [1992] Public Law 279–99.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Thomas“Fair Play to All Sides of the Truth”: Controlling Media Distortions’ (2009) 62 Current Legal Problems 286315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, ThomasFree Speech, Communication and the State’ in Merris, Amos, Jackie, Harrison and Lorna, Woods (eds.), Freedom of Expression and the Media (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012) 1944.Google Scholar
Gibbons, ThomasActive Pluralism: Dialogue and Engagement as Basic Media Policy Principles’ (2015) 9 International Journal of Communication 1382–99.Google Scholar
Gibbons, ThomasWhat Is “Sufficient” Plurality?’ in Barnett, Steven and Townend, Judith (eds.), Media Power and Plurality: From Hyperlocal to High-Level Policy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2015) 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, ThomasProviding a Platform for Speech: Possible Duties and Responsibilities’ in Kenyon, Andrew T and Andrew, Scott (eds.), Positive Free Speech: Rationales, Methods and Implications (Oxford: Hart 2020) 1123.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Thomas and Humphreys, Peter, Audiovisual Regulation under Pressure: Comparative Cases from North America and Europe (Abingdon: Routledge 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Benjamin, Freedom and Liberation (New York: St Martin’s Press 1976).Google Scholar
Gillespie, Tarleton, Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media (New Haven: Yale University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Girard, Charles, ‘Making Democratic Contestation Possible: Public Deliberation and Mass Media Regulation’ (2015) 36 Policy Studies 283–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Charles Délibérer entre égaux: Enquête sur l’idéal démocratique (Paris: Vrin, L’esprit des lois 2019).Google Scholar
Goldenfein, Jake, Monitoring Laws: Profiling and Identity in the World State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I and Baker, Daniel, ‘Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy’ (2019) 18 First Amendment Law Review 66141.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert, Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Carol C, Rethinking Democracy: Freedom and Social Cooperation in Politics, Economy, and Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988).Google Scholar
Gould, Carol CRetrieving Positive Freedom and Why It Matters’ in Baum, Bruce and Nichols, Robert (eds.), Isaiah Berlin and the Politics of Freedom: ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ 50 Years Later (New York: Routledge 2013) 102–13.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A, Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism (Berkeley: University of California Press 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Thomas Hill, Lectures on the Principals of Political Obligation (London: Longmans, Green and Co. 1895).Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter, ‘The Protective Function of the State’ in Nolte, Georg (ed.), European and US Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005) 137–55.Google Scholar
Grimm, DieterFreedom of Speech in a Globalized World’ in Ivan, Hare and James, Weinstein (eds.), Extreme Speech and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009) 1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzeszick, Bernd, ‘The “Serving” Freedom to Broadcast: Subjective versus Objective Dimensions of a Fundamental Right’ in Pünder, Hermann and Waldhoff, Christian (eds.), Debates in German Public Law (Oxford: Hart 2014) 7595.Google Scholar
Günther, Klaus, ‘Communicative Freedom, Communicative Power, and Jurisgenesis’ in Rosenfeld, Michel and Arato, Andrew (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges (Berkeley: University of California Press 1998) 234–54.Google Scholar
Gurevitch, Michael and Blumer, Jay G, ‘Political Communication Systems and Democratic Values’ in Lichtenberg, Judith (ed.), Democracy and the Mass Media (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990) 270–89.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, ‘The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article’ (1974) no. 3 New German Critique 4955 (translated by Sara Lennox and Frank Lennox, original German publication 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (translated by Thomas Burger with assistance from Frederick Lawrence) (Cambridge MA: MIT Press 1989, original German publication 1962).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (translated by William Rehg) (Cambridge: Polity 1996, original German publication 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, JürgenPolitical Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research’ (2006) 16 Communication Theory 411–26 and, in a longer form, in Jürgen Habermas, Europe: The Faltering Project (translated by Ciaran Cronin) (Cambridge: Polity 2009) 138–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, JürgenMedia, Markets and Consumers: The Quality Press as the Backbone of the Political Public Sphere’ in Habermas, Jürgen, Europe: The Faltering Project (translated by Ciaran Cronin) (Cambridge: Polity 2009) 131–37.Google Scholar
Hailbronner, Michaela, Traditions and Transformations: The Rise of German Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, Franklyn S, Speech and Law in a Free Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1981).Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, ‘Which Public, Whose Service?’ in Stevenson, Wilf (ed.), All Our Futures: The Changing Role and Purpose of the BBC (London: BFI 1993) 2338.Google Scholar
Hallin, Daniel C and Mancini, Paolo, Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallin, Daniel C and Mancini, Paolo (eds.), Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Hansen, Ejvind, ‘The Positive Freedom of the Public Sphere’ (2015) 16 Journalism Studies 767–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Sven Ove, ‘Mill’s Circle(s) of Liberty’ (2015) 41 Social Theory and Practice 734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Jonathan, Western Media Systems (Abingdon: Routledge 2008).Google Scholar
Hardy, Jonathan Critical Political Economy of the Media: An Introduction (Abingdon: Routledge 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselbach, Suzanne and Vincent, Porter, ‘The Re-Regulation of West German Broadcasting: Recent Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court’ (1988) 1(2) Politics and Society in Germany, Austria and Switzerland 4865.Google Scholar
Heinze, Eric, Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helberger, Natali, ‘Exposure Diversity as a Policy Goal’ (2012) 4 Journal of Media Law 6592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia, Rights and Goods: Justifying Social Action (New York: Free Press 1984).Google Scholar
Held, VirginiaAccess, Enablement, and the First Amendment’ in Meyers, Diana T and Kenneth, Kipnis (eds.), Philosophical Dimensions of the Constitution (Boulder: Westview 1988) 158–79.Google Scholar
Hesmondalgh, David, ‘Capitalism and the Media: Moral Economy, Well-Being and Capabilities’ (2017) 39 Media, Culture and Society 202–18.Google Scholar
Heun, Werner, The Constitution of Germany: A Contextual Analysis (Oxford: Hart 2011).Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J, The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2002).Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J Gender, Class, and Freedom in Modern Political Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Hitchens, Lesley, Broadcasting, Pluralism and Diversity (Oxford: Hart 2006).Google Scholar
Hochmann, Thomas, ‘La liberté d’expression: à la recherche des exceptionnalismcs (et de l’intérêt d’une telle entreprise)’ in Stéfanini, Marthe Fatin-Rouge and Scoffoni, Guy (eds.), Libertés et exceptionnalismes nationaux (Brussels: Éditions Bruylant 2015) 157–70.Google Scholar
Hochmann, ThomasMotivation et justice constitutionnelle: le modèle allemand’ (2017) no. 55–6 Les Nouveaux Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel 2331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, William Ernest, Freedom of the Press: A Framework of Principle, A Report from the Commission on Freedom of the Press (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1947).Google Scholar
Hodge, John L, ‘Democracy and Free Speech: A Normative Theory of Society and Government’ in Chamberlin, Bill F and Brown, Charlene J (eds.), The First Amendment Reconsidered: New Perspectives on the Meaning of Freedom of Speech and Press (New York: Longman 1982) 148–80.Google Scholar
Hoffmann‐Riem, Wolfgang, ‘Law, Politics and the New Media: Trends in Broadcasting Regulation’ (1986) 9(4) West European Politics 125–46 (translated by Peter Humphreys).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann‐Riem, Wolfgang Regulating Media: The Licensing and Supervision of Broadcasting in Six Countries (New York: Guilford Press 1996).Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel, ‘Negative Freedom and Cultural Belonging: An Unhealthy Tension in the Political Philosophy of Isaiah Berlin’ (1999) 66 Social Research 1063–77.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life (translated by Joseph Ganahl) (Cambridge: Polity 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Robert B, ‘The First Amendment Meets Some New Technologies: Broadcasting, Common Carriers, and Free Speech in the 1990s’ (1991) 20 Theory and Society 2172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Robert BOn Media Concentration and the Diversity Question’ (2005) 21 The Information Society: An International Journal 181204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Kirsty, ‘AAA v. Associated Newspapers Ltd’ in Stalford, Helen, Hollingsworth, Kathryn and Gilmore, Stephen (eds.), Rewriting Children’s Rights Judgments: From Academic Vision to New Practice (Oxford: Hart 2017) 200–9.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Peter J, Media and Media Policy in Germany: The Press and Broadcasting since 1945 (2nd ed., Oxford: Berg 1994).Google Scholar
Humphreys, Peter JGermany’s “Dual” Broadcasting System: Recipe for Pluralism in the Age of Multi-Channel Broadcasting?’ (1999) no. 78 New German Critique 2352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Peter JEU State Aid Rules, Public Service Broadcasters’ Online Media Engagement and Public Value Tests: The German and UK Cases Compared’ (2009) 1 Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture 171–84.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Peter and Lang, Matthias, ‘Regulating for Media Pluralism and the Pitfalls of Standortpolitik: The Reregulation of German Broadcasting Ownership Rules’ (1998) 7(2) German Politics 176201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humprecht, Edda, Esser, Frank and Van Aelst, Peter, ‘Resilience to Online Disinformation: A Framework for Cross-National Comparative Research’ (2020) 25 International Journal of Press/Politics 493516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Rosemary, McGlynn, Clare and Rackley, Erika (eds.), Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (Oxford: Hart 2010).Google Scholar
Huntsberger, Michael W, ‘Attempting an Affirmative Approach to American Broadcasting: Ideology, Politics, and the Public Telecommunications Facilities Program’ (2014) 91 Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 756–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan C, ‘Talking the Good Life: From Free Speech to Democratic Dialogue’ (1989) 1 Yale Journal of Law and Liberation 1730.Google Scholar
International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems (MacBride Commission), Many Voices, One World: Towards a New, More Just, and More Efficient World Information and Communications Order (Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 1980).Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, et al., ‘A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy’ in Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane (eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012) 126.Google Scholar
Jones, Paul, ‘Democratic Norms and Means of Communication: Public Sphere, Fourth Estate, Freedom of Communication’ (2000) 1 Critical Horizons 307–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, PaulThe Best of Both Worlds? Freedom of Communication and “Positive” Broadcasting Regulation’ (2001) 23 Media, Culture and Society 385–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, PaulThe Implied Constitutional Freedom of Political Communication and Australian Media Policy’ (2003) 5 UTS Law Review 6585.Google Scholar
Jones, Paul K and Pusey, Michael, ‘Political Communication and “Media System”: the Australian Canary’ (2010) 32 Media, Culture and Society 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josende, Lauriane, Liberté d’expression et démocratie: Réflexion sur un paradoxe (Brussels: Bruylant 2010).Google Scholar
Kahana, Tsvi, ‘Hybrid State Accountability and Hybrid Rights: Positive Rights, Exclusion, and State Action in Canada’ in Kahana, Tsvi and Scolnicov, Anat (eds.), Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights: Human Rights, Private Actors, and Positive Obligations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016) 173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahana, Tsvi and Scolnicov, Anat (eds.), Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights: Human Rights, Private Actors, and Positive Obligations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karppinen, Kari, Rethinking Media Pluralism (New York: Fordham University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karppinen, KariBeyond Positive and Negative Conceptions of Free Speech’ in Maria, Edström, Kenyon, Andrew T and Eva-Maria, Svensson (eds.), Blurring the Lines: Market-Driven and Democracy-Driven Freedom of Expression (Gothenberg: Nordicom 2016) 4150.Google Scholar
Karppinen, KariFreedom Without Idealization: Non-Ideal Approaches to Freedom of Communication’ (2019) 29 Communication Theory 6685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsirea, Irini, Public Broadcasting and European Law: A Comparative Examination of Public Service Obligations in Six Members States (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2008).Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Aileen, ‘Participation and Judicial Review: A Reply to Jeremy Waldron’ (2003) 22 Law and Philosophy 451–86.Google Scholar
Keane, John, The Media and Democracy (Cambridge: Polity 1991).Google Scholar
Keane, John The Life and Death of Democracy (London: Simon & Schuster 2009).Google Scholar
Keane, John Democracy and Media Decadence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Perry, European and International Media Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelty, Christopher M, ‘The Fog of Freedom’ in Gillespie, Tarleton, Boczkowski, Pablo J and Foot, Kirsten A (eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (Cambridge MA: MIT Press 2014) 195220.Google Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew T, Defamation: Comparative Law and Practice (London: UCL Press 2006).Google Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew TWhat Conversation? Free Speech and Defamation Law’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 697720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew TAssuming Free Speech’ (2014) 77 Modern Law Review 379408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew TFree-Media-Speech: Free Speech and Public Media’ (2014) 10 International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew TWho, What, Why and How: Questions for Positive Free Speech and Media Systems’ in Maria, Edström, Kenyon, Andrew T and Eva-Maria, Svensson (eds.), Blurring the Lines: Market-Driven and Democracy-Driven Freedom of Expression (Gothenburg: Nordicom 2016) 2939.Google Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew TRethinking Reynolds: Defending Public Interest Speech’ in Doreen, Weisenhaus and Young, Simon N M (eds.), Media Law and Policy in the Internet Age (Oxford: Hart 2017) 6173.Google Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew TThe State of Affairs of Freedom: Implications of German Broadcasting Freedom’ in Kenyon, Andrew T and Scott, Andrew (eds.), Positive Free Speech: Rationales, Methods and Implications (Oxford: Hart 2020) 8396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew T ‘Positive Free Speech: A Democratic Freedom’ in Stone, Adrienne and Schauer, Frederick (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021) 231248.Google Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew T and Scott, Andrew (eds.), Positive Free Speech: Rationales, Methods and Implications (Oxford: Hart 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Andrew T, Svensson, Eva-Maria and Edström, Maria, ‘Building and Sustaining Freedom of Expression: Considering Sweden’ (2017) 38(1) Nordicom Review 3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Jeremy K and Pozen, David E, ‘The Search for an Egalitarian First Amendment’ (2018) 118 Columbia Law Review 19532010.Google Scholar
Khan, Lina M and Pozen, David E, ‘A Skeptical View of Information Fiduciaries’ (2019) 133 Harvard Law Review 497541.Google Scholar
Kierulf, Anine, Judicial Review in Norway: A Bicentennial Debate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhof, Paul, Gutachten über die Finanzierung des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks (Heidelberg 2010) (‘Expert Opinion on the Financing of Public Service Broadcasting’) available at www.ard.de/download/398406/index.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolo, Castulus and Weichert, Stephan, ‘Germany: Evaluating Alternatives to Finance Quality Journalism’ in Murschetz, Paul (ed.), State Aid for Newspapers: Theories, Cases, Actions (Heidelberg: Springer 2014) 215–35.Google Scholar
Koltay, András, ‘The Concept of Media Freedom Today: New Media, New Editors and the Traditional Approach of the Law’ (2015) 7 Journal of Media Law 3664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kommers, Donald P, ‘Germany: Balancing Rights and Duties’ in Goldsworthy, Jeffrey (ed.), Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006) 161214.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P and Miller, Russell A, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (3rd ed., Durham: Duke University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Krotoszynski, Ronald J Jr, The First Amendment in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Freedom of Speech (New York: New York University Press 2006).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Raymond, ‘Les médias, c’est moi.” President Sarkozy and News Media Management’ (2010) 8 French Politics 355–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Raymond The Media in Contemporary France (Maidenhead: Open University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Kuhn, RaymondFrance: Funding Public Service Media in the Digital Age’ in Christian, Herzog, Heiko, Hilker, Leonard, Novy and Orkan, Torun (eds.), Transparency and Funding of Public Service Media: Die deutsche Debatte im internationalen Kontext (Wiesbaden: Springer VS 2017) 5564.Google Scholar
Kuhn, RaymondPublic Service Media in France’ in Połońska, Eva and Beckett, Charlie (eds.), Public Service Broadcasting and Media Systems in Troubled European Democracies (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2019) 6987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, ‘Institutionalising Socratic Contestation: The Rationalist Human Rights Paradigm, Legitimate Authority and the Point of Judicial Review’ (2007) 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 153–83.Google Scholar
Kumm, MattiasThe Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review’ (2010) 4 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 141–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, ‘Guaranteeing the Programming Mandate of Public Broadcasters and Restraints on Private Broadcasters’ Programmes in Multimedia Conditions; (2004) 5 German Law Journal 907–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladeur, Karl-HeinzLegal Questions of Excluding Participants from Internet Discussion Groups: On the Guaranteeing of Freedom of Communication through “Network- Adapted” Private Law’ (2008) 9 German Law Journal 965–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardeau, Matthieu and Le Floch, Patrick, ‘France: Press Subsidies – Inefficient but Enduring’ in Murschetz, Paul (ed.), State Aid for Newspapers: Theories, Cases, Actions (Heidelberg: Springer 2014) 195214.Google Scholar
Levy, Ron and Orr, Graeme, The Law of Deliberative Democracy (Abingdon: Routledge 2017).Google Scholar
Lewis, Justin, ‘The Commercial Constraints on Speech Limit Democratic Debate’ in Edström, Maria, Kenyon, Andrew T and Svensson, Eva-Maria (eds.), Blurring the Lines: Market-Driven and Democracy-Driven Freedom of Expression (Gothenburg, Nordicom 2016) 91–9.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, Judith, ‘Foundations and Limits of Freedom of the Press’ in Lichtenberg, Judith (ed.), Democracy and the Mass Media: A Collection of Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990) 102–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidsky, Lyrissa, ‘Public Forum 2.0’ (2011) 91 Boston University Law Review 19752028.Google Scholar
Linder, Laura R, Public Access Television: America’s Electronic Soapbox (Westport: Praeger 1999).Google Scholar
Lipson, Morris, ‘Autonomy and Democracy’ (1995) 104 Yale Law Journal 2249–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Lucchi, Nicola, ‘Media Freedom and Pluralism in the Digital Infrastructure’ in Patricia Jonason and Anna Rosengren (eds.), The Right of Access to Information and the Right to Privacy: A Democratic Balancing Act (Stockholm: Södertörn University, working paper 2017:2) 151–61.Google Scholar
Mac Síngh, Daithí, ‘From Freedom of Speech to the Right to Communicate’ in Price, Monroe E, Verhulst, Stefaan G and Morgan, Libby (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Media Law (Abingdon: Routledge 2013) 175–91.Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald C Jr, ‘Negative and Positive Freedom’ (1967) 76 Philosophical Review 312–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGilvray, Eric, ‘Republicanism and the Market in “Two Concepts of Liberty”’ in Baum, Bruce and Nichols, Robert (eds.), Isaiah Berlin and the Politics of Freedom: ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ 50 Years Later (New York: Routledge 2013) 114–26.Google Scholar
Macpherson, Crawford B, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1973).Google Scholar
Maia, Rousiley CM, Deliberation, the Media and Political Talk (New York: Hampton Press 2012).Google Scholar
Maia, Rousiley CMDeliberative Media’ in Andre, Bächtiger, Dryzek, John S, Jane, Mansbridge and Mark, Warren (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018) 348–64.Google Scholar
Majury, Diana, ‘Introducing the Women’s Court of Canada’ (2006) 18 Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 112.Google Scholar
Mak, Elaine, Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts (Oxford: Hart 2013).Google Scholar
Mansell, Robin, ‘From Digital Divides to Digital Entitlements in Knowledge Societies’ (2002) 50 Current Sociology 407–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcangelo-Leos, Philie, Pluralisme et audiovisuel (Paris: LGDJ 2004).Google Scholar
Martin, Robert WT, The Free and Open Press: The Founding of American Democratic Press Liberty, 1640–1800 (New York: New York University Press 2001).Google Scholar
Mathien, Michel, ‘Un sujet d’actualité et de confrontation entre les valeurs de la démocratie et de l’économie’ in Kiyindou, Alain and Mathien, Michel (eds.), Évolution de l’économie libérale et liberté d’expression (Brussels: Bruylant 2007) 124.Google Scholar
Maurer, Peter, ‘In the Grip of Politics? How Political Journalists in France and Germany Perceive Political Influence on their Work’ (2019) 20 Journalism 1242–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McChesney, Robert W and Pickard, Victor (eds.), Will the Last Reporter Please Turn Out the Lights: The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done to Fix It (New York: New Press 2011).Google Scholar
McCormick, John P, Machiavellian Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGonagle, Tarlach, ‘The State and Beyond: Activating (Non-)Media Voices’ in Sousa, Helena, Pinto, Manuel, Fidalgo, Joaquim et al. (eds.), Media Policy and Regulation: Activating Voices, Illuminating Silences (Braga: University of Minho 2013) 187–98.Google Scholar
McGonagle, TarlachPositive Obligations Concerning Freedom of Expression: Mere Potential or Real Power?’ in Onur, Andreotti (Council of Europe Task Force for Freedom of Expression and Media) (ed.), Journalism at Risk: Threats, Challenges and Perspectives (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing 2015) 935.Google Scholar
Mchangama, Jacob and Fiss, Joelle, The Digital Berlin Wall: How Germany (Accidentally) Created a Prototype for Global Online Censorship (Copenhagen: Justitia 2019) available via http://justitia-int.org.Google Scholar
McIver, William J Jr, Birdsall, William F and Rasmussen, Merrilee, ‘The Internet and the Right to Communicate’ (2003) 8(12) First Monday, http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_12/mciver/index.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, Matthew, ‘A Critical Legal Conception of Human Dignity’ (2019) 18 Journal of Human Rights 5775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhinney, Edward, Constitutionalism in Germany and the Federal Constitutional Court (Leydon: Sythhoff 1962).Google Scholar
Meier, Henk Erik, ‘Beyond Convergence: Understanding Programming Strategies of Public Broadcasters in Competitive Environments’ (2003) 18 European Journal of Communication 337–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Henk Erik“For a Few Cents Less”? Nested Games in German Broadcasting Regulation’ (2006) 15 German Politics 166–91.Google Scholar
Meier, Henk ErikIndependent Regulatory Bodies and Impossible Jobs: The Failure of German Public Service Broadcasting Regulation’ (2008) 86 Public Administration 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiklejohn, Alexander, Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People (New York: Harper 1960).Google Scholar
Menuret, Jean-Jacques, ‘La place du Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel au sein des autorités administratives indépendantes’ in Bloud-Rey, Céline and Menuret, Jean-Jacques (eds.), Le droit de la régulation audiovisuelle et le numérique (Brussels: Larcier 2016) 1331.Google Scholar
Miannay, Stéphane, ‘Le statut du Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel: texte et pratique de l’indépendance’ in Regourd, Serge and Calandri, Laurence (eds.), La régulation de la communication audiovisuelle: Enjeux et perspectives (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut Universitaire Varenne 2015) 3341.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty (edited by Currin V Shields) (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill 1956).Google Scholar
Mills, Tom, The BBC: Myth of a Public Service (London: Verso 2016).Google Scholar
Moe, Hallvard, ‘Governing Public Service Broadcasting: “Public Value Tests” in Different National Contexts’ (2010) 3 Communication, Culture and Critique 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, Kai, The Global Model of Constitutional Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondal, Anshuman A, ‘The Shape of Free Speech: Rethinking Liberal Free Speech Theory’ (2018) 32 Continuum 503–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Richard, The Constitutional Protection of Freedom of Expression (Toronto: University of Toronto Press 2000).Google Scholar
Morange, Jean, ‘La protection constitutionnelle et civile de la liberté d’expression’ (1990) 42 Revue internationale de droit comparé 771–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morange, Jean La liberté d’expression (Brussels: Bruylant 2009).Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal, On the Political (New York: Routledge 2005).Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner, ‘Militant Democracy’ in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 1253–69.Google Scholar
Müller, Roswitha, ‘From Public to Private: Television in the Federal Republic of Germany’ (1990) no. 50 New German Critique 4155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Sebastian and Christoph, Gusy, Background Information Report: Media Policies and Regulatory Practices in a Selected Set of European Countries, the EU and the Council of Europe: The Case of Germany (MEDIADEM 2010) available via https://bit.ly/3a1Cxu7.Google Scholar
Müller, Sebastian and Christoph, Gusy Case Study Report: Does Media Policy Promote Media Freedom and Independence? The Case of Germany (MEDIADEM 2011) available via https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/244365/results.Google Scholar
Myers, Ella, ‘Berlin and Democracy’ in Baum, Bruce and Nichols, Robert (eds.), Isaiah Berlin and the Politics of Freedom: ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ 50 Years Later (New York: Routledge 2013) 129–42.Google Scholar
Napoli, Philip M, ‘Deconstructing the Diversity Principle’ (1999) 49(4) Journal of Communication 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Philip MExposure Diversity Reconsidered’ (2011) 1 Journal of Information Law and Policy 246–59.Google Scholar
Napoli, Philip M Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age (New York: Columbia University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nechushtai, Efrat, ‘From Liberal to Polarized Liberal? Contemporary US News in Hallin and Mancini’s Typology of News Systems’ (2018) 23 International Journal of Press/Politics 183201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordicity, Analysis of Government Support for Public Broadcasting: Prepared for CBC Radio Canada (11 April 2016) available via www.nordicity.com.Google Scholar
Norton, Helen, The Government’s Speech and the Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Mahen, Patrick, ‘A Big Bird Effect? The Interaction Among Public Broadcasting, Public Subsidies, and Political Knowledge’ (2016) 8 European Political Science Review 311–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, ‘Practices of Toleration’ in Lichtenberg, Judith (ed.), Democracy and the Mass Media: A Collection of Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990) 155–85.Google Scholar
Oehme, Hannes, L’indépendance de l’audiovisuel public à l’égard des institutions politiques en France et en Allemagne (Paris: LGDJ 2019).Google Scholar
Örtenhed, Kristina and Wennberg, Bertil (eds.), Press Freedom 250 Years: Freedom of the Press and Public Access to Official Documents in Sweden and Finland – A Living Heritage from 1766 (Stockholm: Swedish Parliament 2017).Google Scholar
Oster, Jan, Media Freedom as a Fundamental Right (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padovani, Claudia and Calabrese, Andrew (eds.), Communication Rights and Social Justice: Historical Accounts of Transnational Mobilizations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partlett, William, ‘The American Tradition of Constituent Power’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 955–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavani, Giorgia, The Structure and Governance of Public Service Broadcasting: A Comparative Perspective (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Carmen E and Schmidtz, David, ‘Introduction’ in Schmidtz, David and Pavel, Carmen E (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Freedom (New York: Oxford University Press 2018) 118.Google Scholar
Perry, Ralph Barton, Puritanism and Democracy (New York: Vanguard 1944).Google Scholar
Peter, Fabienne, Democratic Legitimacy (New York: Routledge 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Bernhard, Public Deliberation and Public Culture: The Writings of Bernhard Peters, 1993–2005 (edited by Hartmut Wessler; translated by Keith Tribe) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2008).Google Scholar
Peters, John Durham, Courting the Abyss: Free Speech and the Liberal Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Niels, Proportionality and Judicial Activism: Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip, ‘Enfranchising Silence: An Argument for Freedom of Speech’ in Campbell, Tom and Sadurski, Wojciech (eds.), Freedom of Communication (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1994) 4555.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1997).Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip Just Freedom: A Moral Compass for a Complex World (New York: Norton 2014).Google Scholar
Pettit, PhilipTwo Concepts of Free Speech’ in Jennifer, Lackey (ed.), Academic Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018) 6182.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Gavin, ‘Deference, Discretion and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’ (2007) 60 Current Legal Problems 4078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, GavinLeveson, the Public Interest and Press Freedom’ (2013) 5 Journal of Media Law 220–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, GavinPress Freedom, the Public Interest and Privacy’ in Kenyon, Andrew T (ed.), Comparative Defamation and Privacy Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016) 136–63.Google Scholar
Picard, Robert G, The Press and the Decline of Democracy: The Democratic Socialist Response in Public Policy (Westport: Greenwood 1985).Google Scholar
Picard, Robert G and Dal Zotto, Cinzia, ‘The Dimension of Ownership and Control of Media’ in Valcke, Peggy, Sükösd, Miklós and Picard, Robert G (eds.), Media Pluralism and Diversity: Concepts, Risks and Global Trends (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2016) 5466.Google Scholar
Pickard, Victor, America’s Battle for Media Democracy: The Triumph of Corporate Libertarianism and the Future of Media Reform (New York: Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Pickard, VictorTowards a People’s Internet: The Fight for Positive Freedoms in an Age of Corporate Libertarianism’ in Maria, Edström, Kenyon, Andrew T and Eva-Maria, Svensson (eds.), Blurring the Lines: Market-Driven and Democracy-Driven Freedom of Expression (Gothenburg: Nordicom 2016) 61–8.Google Scholar
Pickard, VictorThe Strange Life and Death of the Fairness Doctrine: Tracing the Decline of Positive Freedoms in American Policy Discourse’ (2018) 12 International Journal of Communication 3434–53.Google Scholar
Pickard, Victor Democracy Without Journalism? Confronting the Misinformation Society (New York: Oxford University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poell, Thomas, ‘Three Challenges for Media Studies in the Age of Platforms’ (2020) 21 Television and New Media 650–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, Ithiel de Sola, Technologies of Freedom (Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1983).Google Scholar
Pool, Ithiel de Sola Technologies Without Boundaries: On Telecommunications in a Global Age (posthumously edited by Eli M Noam) (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Vincent and Hasselbach, Suzanne, ‘Beyond Balanced Pluralism: Broadcasting in Germany’ in Dahlgren, Peter and Sparks, Colin (eds.), Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere in the New Media Age (London: Routledge 1991) 94115.Google Scholar
Porter, Vincent and Hasselbach, Suzanne Pluralism, Politics and the Marketplace: The Regulation of German Broadcasting (London: Routledge 1991).Google Scholar
Post, Robert C, Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, Management (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 1995).Google Scholar
Post, Robert CSubsidized Speech’ (1996) 106 Yale Law Journal 151–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, Robert CEquality and Autonomy in First Amendment Jurisprudence’ (1997) 95 Michigan Law Review 1517–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, Robert C Democracy, Expertise, and Academic Freedom: A First Amendment Jurisprudence for the Modern State (New Haven: Yale University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Potschka, Christian, Towards a Market in Broadcasting: Communications Policy in the UK and Germany (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuss-Laussinotte, Sylvia, La liberté d’expression (Paris: Ellipses 2014).Google Scholar
Price, Monroe and Stremlau, Nicole (eds.), Speech and Society in Turbulent Times: Freedom of Expression in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Raboy, Marc and Shtern, Jeremy, ‘Toward a Canadian Right to Communicate’ in Raboy, Marc and Jeremy, Shtern with McIver, William J, Murray, Laura J, Ó Siochrú, Seán and Shade, Leslie Regan, Media Divides: Communication Rights and the Right to Communicate in Canada (Vancouver: UBC Press 2010) 249–66.Google Scholar
Raboy, Marc and Jeremy, Shtern with McIver, William J, Murray, Laura J, Seán, Ó Siochrú and Leslie Regan, Shade, Media Divides: Communication Rights and the Right to Communicate in Canada (Vancouver: UBC Press 2010).Google Scholar
Raeijmaekers, Danielle and Maeseele, Pieter, ‘Media, Pluralism and Democracy: What’s in a Name?’ (2015) 37 Media, Culture and Society 1042–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986).Google Scholar
Raz, JosephFree Expression and Personal Identification’ (1991) 11 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 303–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, JosephDisagreement in Politics’ (1998) 43 American Journal of Jurisprudence 2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regourd, Serge, Droit de la communication audiovisuelle (Paris: Presses universitaires de France 2001).Google Scholar
Regourd, SergeGénéalogie du droit français de la communication audiovisuelle’ in Regourd, Serge and Calandri, Laurence (eds.), La régulation de la communication audiovisuelle: Enjeux et perspectives (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut Universitaire Varenne 2015) 1728.Google Scholar
Regourd, Serge and Calandri, Laurence, ‘Avant-propos’ in Regourd, Serge and Calandri, Laurence (eds.), La régulation de la communication audiovisuelle: Enjeux et perspectives (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut Universitaire Varenne 2015) 1115.Google Scholar
Regourd, Serge and Calandri, Laurence (eds.), La régulation de la communication audiovisuelle: Enjeux et perspectives (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut Universitaire Varenne 2015).Google Scholar
Rimbert, Pierre, ‘Projet pour une presse libre’, Le Monde diplomatique, December 2014, 20–1.Google Scholar
Ritchie, David G, Natural Rights: A Criticism of Some Political and Ethical Conceptions (London: Swan Sonnenschein 1895).Google Scholar
Roberts, Andrew J, Privacy in the Republic (PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam 2019) https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/42627565/Thesis.pdf. Rogers, Nicole and Maloney, Michelle (eds.), Law as if Earth Really Mattered: The Wild Law Judgment Project (Abingdon: Routledge 2017).Google Scholar
Rogoff, Martin A, ‘Fifty Years of Constitutional Evolution in France: The 2008 Amendments and Beyond’ (2011) no. 6 Jus Politicum: Le Parlement français et le nouveau droit parlementaire après la réforme de 2008, 17 available via juspoliticum.com.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Martin A French Constitutional Law: Cases and Materials (2nd ed., Durham NC: Carolina Academic Press 2014).Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre, ‘Review of Stephen Breyer, Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution’ (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 564–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust (translated by Arthur Goldhammer) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre Le Parlement des invisibles (Paris: Seuil/Raconter la vie 2014).Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre Good Government: Democracy Beyond Elections (translated by Malcolm DeBevoise) (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michael and Sajó, András (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostbøll, Christian F, Deliberative Freedom: Deliberative Democracy as Critical Theory (Albany: State University of New York Press 2008).Google Scholar
Roujou de Boubée, Pierre, Les fondements constitutionnels de la liberté de la communication audiovisuelle: Approche comparative entre les grands modèles dans l’Union européenne (Bayonne: Institut Universitaire Varenne 2018).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Dominique (ed.), La démocratie continue (Paris: Bruylant/LGDJ 1995).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Dominique, Gahdoun, Pierre-Yves and Bonnet, Julien, Droit du contentieux constitutionnel (11th ed., Issy-les-Moulineaux: LGDJ 2016).Google Scholar
Rowbottom, Jacob, ‘Media Freedom and Political Debate in the Digital Era’ (2006) 69 Modern Law Review 489513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowbottom, JacobExtreme Speech and the Democratic Functions of the Mass Media’ in Ivan, Hare and James, Weinstein (eds.), Extreme Speech and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009) 608–30.Google Scholar
Rowbottom, Jacob Democracy Distorted: Wealth, Influence and Democratic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowbottom, JacobGovernment Speech and Public Opinion: Democracy by the Bootstraps’ (2017) 25 Journal of Political Philosophy 2247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowbottom, JacobPositive Protection for Speech and Substantive Political Equality’ in Kenyon, Andrew T and Andrew, Scott (eds.), Positive Free Speech: Rationales, Methods and Implications (Oxford: Hart 2020) 2541.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed, Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government (New Haven: Yale University Press 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech, Freedom of Speech and Its Limits (Dordrecht: Kluwer 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech Equality and Legitimacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, David T, ‘Pathologies of Freedom: Axel Honneth’s Unofficial Theory of Reification’ (2018) 25 Constellations 421–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, Free Speech: A Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982).Google Scholar
Schauer, FrederickFree Speech in a World of Private Power’ in Campbell, Tom and Sadurski, Wojciech (eds.), Freedom of Communication (Aldershot: Dartmouth 1994) 116.Google Scholar
Schauer, FrederickHohfeld’s First Amendment’ (2008) 76 George Washington Law Review 914–32.Google Scholar
Schauer, FrederickBook Review: When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? How Democracies Can Protect Expression and Promote Equality, by Corey Brettschneider’ (2014) 42 Political Theory 498501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, FrederickPositive Rights, Negative Rights, and the Right to Know’ in Pozen, David E and Michael, Schudson (eds.), Troubling Transparency: The History and Future of Freedom of Information (New York: Columbia University Press 2018) 3451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, FrederickCosts and Challenges of the Hostile Audience’ (2019) 94 Notre Dame Law Review 1671–98.Google Scholar
Schejter, Amit and Tirosh, Noam, A Justice-Based Approach for New Media Policy: In the Paths of Righteousness (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosberg, Justin R, Media Ownership and Agenda Control: The Hidden Limits of the Information Age (Abingdon: Routledge 2017).Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael, ‘The Public Sphere and Its Problems: Bringing the State (Back) In’ (1994) 8 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 529–46.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life (New York: Martin Kessler Books 1998).Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael The Rise of the Right to Know: Politics and the Culture of Transparency, 1945–1975 (Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Wolfgang, ‘The Legal Framework for Public Service Broadcasting after the German State Aid Case: Procrustean Bed or Hammock?’ (2009) 1 Journal of Media Law 219–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, WolfgangHow to Control Informal Practices by Formal Law? The German Constitutional Court’s Ruling on the Independence of the Public Service Broadcaster ZDF from the State’ (2016) 7 Journal of Media Law 145–51.Google Scholar
Schulz, Wolfgang, Valcke, Peggy and Irion, Kristina (eds.), The Independence of the Media and its Regulatory Agencies: Shedding New Light on Formal and Actual Independence against the National Context (European Communication Research and Education Series) (Bristol: Intellect 2013).Google Scholar
Scott, Andrew and Burke, Abbey, ‘The Access to Information Dimension of Positive Free Speech’ in Kenyon, Andrew T and Scott, Andrew (eds.), Positive Free Speech: Rationales, Methods and Implications (Oxford: Hart 2020) 4364.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, The Idea of Justice (Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2009) and Development as Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharland, Andrew, ‘Focus on Article 10 of the ECHR’ [2009] Judicial Review 5972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, Steven, ‘Dissent, Democratic Participation, and First Amendment Methodology’ (2011) 97 Virginia Law Review 559–66.Google Scholar
Siebert, Fred S, Peterson, Theodore and Schramm, Wilbur, Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do (Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1956).Google Scholar
Sìlìer, Yildiz, Freedom: Political, Metaphysical, Negative and Positive (Aldershot: Ashgate 2005).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives’ in Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, JB and Skinner, Quentin (eds.), Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984) 193222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, QuentinA Third Concept of Liberty’ (2002) 24(7) London Review of Books 16.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B, ‘Freedom of Communicative Action: A Theory of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech’ (1989) 83 Northwestern University Law Review 54135.Google Scholar
Splichal, Slavko, Principles of Publicity and Press Freedom (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield 2002).Google Scholar
Stanchi, Kathryn M, Berger, Linda L and Crawford, Bridget J (eds.), Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starck, Christian, ‘Introduction’ in Starck, Christian (ed.), New Challenges to the German Basic Law: The German Contributions to the Third World Congress of the International Association of Constitutional Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1991) 1523.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul, The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications (New York: Basic Books 2004).Google Scholar
Stein, Laura, Speech Rights in America: The First Amendment, Democracy and the Media (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Steiner, Eva, French Law: A Comparative Approach (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Alec, The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1992).Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, ‘Citizens as Customers: Considerations on the New Politics of Consumption’ (2012) no. 76 New Left Review 2747.Google Scholar
Streeter, Thomas, ‘Beyond Freedom of Speech and the Public Interest: The Relevance of Critical Legal Studies to Communications Policy’ (1990) 40 Journal of Communication 4363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech (New York: Free Press 1993).Google Scholar
Svendsen, Lars, A Philosophy of Freedom (London: Reaktion Books 2014).Google Scholar
Swift, Adam, Political Philosophy (3rd ed., Cambridge: Polity 2014).Google Scholar
Syvertsen, Trine, Enli, Gunn, Mjøs, Ole J and Moe, Hallvard, The Media Welfare State: Nordic Media in the Digital Era (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambini, Damian and Moore, Martin, ‘Conclusion: Dominance, the Citizen Interest and the Consumer Interest’ in Moore, Martin and Tambini, Damian (eds.), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple (New York: Oxford University Press 2018) 396407.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, ‘What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty’ in Ryan, Alan (ed.), The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honour of Isaiah Berlin (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1979) 175–93.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Greg, ‘Diversity Within Government Broadcasters’ in Gounalakis, Georgios and Taylor, Greg (eds.), Media Diversity Law: Australia and Germany Compared (Frankfurt: Peter Lang 2016) 221–45.Google Scholar
The Economist Intelligence Unit, Democracy Index 2013: Democracy in Limbo (London: EIU 2014).Google Scholar
The Economist Intelligence Unit Democracy Index 2015: Democracy in an Age of Anxiety (London: EIU 2016).Google Scholar
The Economist Intelligence Unit Democracy Index 2016: Revenge of the ‘Deplorables’ (London: EIU 2017).Google Scholar
The Economist Intelligence Unit Democracy Index 2017: Free Speech Under Attack (London: EIU 2018).Google Scholar
The Economist Intelligence Unit Democracy Index 2018: Me Too? Political Participation, Protest and Democracy (London: EIU 2019).Google Scholar
The Economist Intelligence Unit Democracy Index 2019: A Year of Democratic Setbacks and Popular Protest (London: EIU 2020).Google Scholar
Thomas, Jean, ‘Our Rights, But Whose Duties? Re-Conceptualizing Rights in the Era of Globalization’ in Kahana, Tsvi and Scolnicov, Anat (eds.), Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights: Human Rights, Private Actors, and Positive Obligations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016) 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Pradip Ninan, Negotiating Communication Rights: Case Studies from India (New Delhi: Sage 2011).Google Scholar
Thomas, Ruth, Broadcasting and Democracy in France (London: Bradford University Press in association with Crosby Lockwood Staples 1976).Google Scholar
Thomass, Barbara, ‘Public Service Media, Civil Society and Transparency’ (2016) 7 International Journal of Digital Television 297313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John B, Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication (Cambridge: Polity 1990).Google Scholar
Thorgeirsdóttir, Herdís, ‘Journalism Worthy of the Name: An Affirmative Reading of Article 10 of the ECHR’ (2004) 22 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 601–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, Adam, Our Republican Constitution (Oxford: Hart 2005).Google Scholar
Treiger-Bar-Am, Kim, Positive Freedom and the Law (Abingdon: Routledge 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troper, Michel, ‘Constitutional and Legal Framework for Rights Protection in France’ in Davis, Dennis, Richter, Alan and Saunders, Cheryl (eds.), An Inquiry into the Existence of Global Values: Through the Lens of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Hart 2015) 177–97.Google Scholar
Truchet, Didier, ‘Les missions et les pouvoirs du CSA’ in Regourd, Serge and Calandri, Laurence (eds.), La régulation de la communication audiovisuelle: Enjeux et perspectives (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut Universitaire Varenne 2015) 4355.Google Scholar
Turow, Joseph, and Draper, Nora, ‘Industry Conceptions of Audience in the Digital Space: A Research Agenda’ (2014) 28 Cultural Studies 643–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Advanced Introduction to Freedom of Expression (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira, False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987).Google Scholar
United Nations, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Handbook for National Human Rights Institutions, HR/P/PT/12 (Geneva: United Nations Publication 2005).Google Scholar
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization,World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development: Regional Overview Western Europe and North America 2017/2018 (Paris: UNESCO 2018).Google Scholar
Valcke, Peggy, Sükösd, Miklós and Picard, Robert G (eds.), Media Pluralism and Diversity: Concepts, Risks and Global Trends (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Aelst, Peter, Strömbäck, Jesper, Aalberg, Toril et al., ‘Political Communication in a High-Choice Media Environment: A Challenge for Democracy?’ (2017) 41(1) Annals of the International Communication Association 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Walt, Johan, ‘Abdications of Sovereignty in State Action and Horizontal Effect Jurisprudence’ in Kahana, Tsvi and Scolnicov, Anat (eds.), Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights: Human Rights, Private Actors, and Positive Obligations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016) 149–72.Google Scholar
Van Dijck, José, Poell, Thomas and de Waal, Martijn, The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hoboken, Joris, Search Engine Freedom: On the Implications of the Right to Freedom of Expression for the Legal Governance of Web Search Engines (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2012).Google Scholar
Verpeaux, Michel, Le Conseil constitutionnel (2nd ed., Paris: La Documentation française 2014).Google Scholar
Viala, Alexandre (ed.), La démocratie: mais qu’en dise les juristes ? Forces et faiblesses de la rationalité juridique (Issy-les-Moulineaux: Lextenso/LGDJ 2014).Google Scholar
Viguier, Jacques, ‘Le juge constitutionnel et al régulation audiovisuelle’ in Regourd, Serge and Calandri, Laurence (eds.), La régulation de la communication audiovisuelle: Enjeux et perspectives (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut Universitaire Varenne 2015) 143–65.Google Scholar
Vinx, Lars, ‘Republicanism and Judicial Review’ (2009) 59 University of Toronto Law Journal 591–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voorhoof, Dirk, ‘Freedom of Journalistic News-Gathering, Access to Information and Protection of Whistleblowers under Article 10 ECHR and the Standards of the Council of Europe’ in Andreotti, Onur (Council of Europe Task Force for Freedom of Expression and Media) (ed.), Journalism at Risk: Threats, Challenges and Perspectives (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing 2015) 105–43.Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael, ‘German Constitutional Court Upholds PSM Funding Model While Highlighting PSM’s Key Role in Digital Landscape’, European Broadcasting Union, Legal Case Note, 18 July 2018, available via https://www.ebu.ch.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal 1346–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy Political Political Theory: Essays on Institutions (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael, Publics and Counterpublics (New York: Zone 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark and Pearse, Hilary (eds.), Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasko, Janet, Murdock, Graham and Sousa, Helena (eds.), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell 2014).Google Scholar
Weigel, Grégoire, ‘Les dispositions audiovisuelles de la loi « Indépendance des médias » étaient-elles nécessaires?’ (2017) no. 346 Légipresse 7580.Google Scholar
Weigel, GrégoireSynthèse, Droit de l’audiovisuel (juillet 2017-juillet 2018)’ (July-August 2018) no. 362 Légipresse 403–8.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Jonathan, ‘Broadcasting and Speech’ (1993) 81 California Law Review 1101–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, James, ‘Participatory Democracy as the Central Value of American Free Speech Doctrine’ (2011) 97 Virginia Law Review 491514.Google Scholar
Wellmer, Albrecht, ‘Models of Freedom in the Modern World’ in Albrecht, Wellmer, Endgames: The Irreconcilable Nature of Modernity, Essays and Lectures (translated by David Midgley) (Cambridge MA: MIT Press 1998) 3–37.Google Scholar
Wessler, Hartmut, Habermas and the Media (Cambridge: Polity 2018).Google Scholar
West, Caroline, ‘Words That Silence? Freedom of Expression and Racist Hate Speech’ in Maitra, Ishani and McGowan, Mary Kate (eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012) 222–48.Google Scholar
Williams, Arthur, Broadcasting and Democracy in West Germany (London: Bradford University Press in association with Crosby Lockwood Staples 1976).Google Scholar
Williams, ArthurWest Germany: The Search for the Way Forward’ in Raymond, Kuhn (ed.), The Politics of Broadcasting (New York: St Martin’s Press 1985) 83118.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond, The Existing Alternatives in Communications (London: Fabian Society 1962).Google Scholar
Williams, Susan H, Truth, Autonomy, and Speech: Feminist Theory and the First Amendment (New York: New York University Press 2004).Google Scholar
Witteman, Christopher, ‘Constitutionalizing Communications: The German Constitutional Court’s Jurisprudence of Communications Freedom’ (2010) 33 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 95201.Google Scholar
Witteman, ChristopherInformation Freedom, a Constitutional Value for the 21st Century’ (2013) 36 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 145255.Google Scholar
Woldt, Runar, ‘Public Service Broadcasting in Germany: Stumbling Blocks on the Digital Highway’ in Iosifidis, Petros (ed.), Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2010). 171–82.Google Scholar
Woods, Lorna, ‘Article 11’ in Peers, Steve, Hervey, Tamara, Kenner, Jeff and Ward, Angela (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart 2014) 311–39.Google Scholar
Xenos, Dimitris, The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention of Human Rights (Abingdon: Routledge 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, ‘Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy’ in Benhabib, Seyla (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1996) 120–35.Google Scholar
Young, Katharine G, ‘Proportionality, Reasonableness, and Economic and Social Rights’ in Jackson, Vicki C and Tushnet, Mark (eds.), Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017) 248–72.Google Scholar
Zanghellini, Aleardo, ‘Why Rights Are not Optimisation Requirements’ (2019) 10 Jurisprudence 354–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar