Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Ethics, politics, and public choice
- 2 The logic of electoral choice
- 3 The nature of expressive returns
- 4 The analytics of decisiveness
- 5 The theory of electoral outcomes: implications for public choice theory
- 6 From anecdote to analysis
- 7 Interpreting the numbers
- 8 Consensus, efficiency, and contractarian justification
- 9 Paternalism, self-paternalism, and the state
- 10 Toward a democratic morality
- 11 Constitutional implications
- Bibliography
- Index
2 - The logic of electoral choice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Ethics, politics, and public choice
- 2 The logic of electoral choice
- 3 The nature of expressive returns
- 4 The analytics of decisiveness
- 5 The theory of electoral outcomes: implications for public choice theory
- 6 From anecdote to analysis
- 7 Interpreting the numbers
- 8 Consensus, efficiency, and contractarian justification
- 9 Paternalism, self-paternalism, and the state
- 10 Toward a democratic morality
- 11 Constitutional implications
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
It may of course be that people just enjoy voting. This could explain why people vote in large elections. But once this type of consideration is brought in, even the ordinal correspondence between votes and preferences is damaged … There will not be a one-to-one correspondence between voting for x … and preferring x.
Amartya Sen, Collective Choice and Social WelfareIntroduction
The analysis of the choice behavior of individual voters must be recognized as occupying a central place in any theory of democratic politics. This is so whether the ultimate purpose of the theory is normative or purely explanatory, and whether the theorizing is of the formal kind characteristic of modern public choice scholarship or rather more informal. Specifically, the theory of voter behavior has the same logical status in political analysis as the theory of consumer behavior in the analysis of markets. Voters are the demanders in the process of political exchange: To ignore voter calculus is therefore like trying to construct standard microeconomics without a theory of demand.
As we have already noted, within the public choice approach to political analysis no distinctive theory of demand is either offered or, in fact, deemed necessary. It has simply been taken for granted that the logic of choice applied in market contexts can be transferred without amendment to the electoral setting. Agents act rationally, whatever the institutional environment. Accordingly, the axioms of rational actor theory are all that one needs.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Democracy and DecisionThe Pure Theory of Electoral Preference, pp. 19 - 31Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1993