Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-06T10:57:01.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Becoming–Dinosaur: Collective Process and Movement Aesthetics

from Act II Confronting Deleuze and Live Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Anna Hickey-Moody
Affiliation:
Monash University
Laura Cull
Affiliation:
Northumbria University
Get access

Summary

This chapter puts forward two arguments. First, I contend that bodies with intellectual disability are constructed through specific systems of knowledge; namely, schemes of thought that are grounded in medical models. These medically based knowledges generate particular systems of affect – where affect is understood as taking something on, as changing in relation to an experience or encounter. Deleuze employs this term in differing ways, but for the purposes of this chapter I am primarily interested in the notion of ‘affectus’, understood as a kind of movement or subjective modulation. In Spinoza: Practical Philosophy Deleuze describes ‘affectus’ as ‘an increase or decrease of the power of acting, for the body and the mind alike’ (Deleuze 1988: 49).1 So, to be affected is to be able think or act differently; although, as responses, affects can easily become habitual. Familiar responses are learnt in relation to bodies and subjects and it is only by challenging the ‘truth’ that is acknowledged in the known response or habitual behaviour that we can learn a new way of responding and of being affected.

Second, I argue that performance spaces can offer radically new ways of being affected by people with disabilities. It is my contention that people who are known as ‘intellectually disabled’ are primarily understood in relation to systems of affect, or kinaesthetic economies of relation, established through medical discourses. As I have argued elsewhere (Hickey-Moody 2006), kinaesthetic economies of relation established via medical discourses of intellectual disability are based upon understandings of bodily limits, rather than bodily capacities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×