Abramowitz, A.I. 1994. “Issue Evolution Reconsidered: Racial Attitudes and Partisanship in the U.S. Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 38:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abramson, Jeffrey B., Christopher Arterton, F. and Orren, Gary R.. 1988. The Electronic Commonwealth: The Impact of New Media Technologies on Democratic Politics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22:475–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Glasgow, Garrett. 2006. “Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts 1996–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50:513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Almond, Gabriel. 1950. The American People and Foreign Policy. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Alt, James E. 1985. “Political Parties, World Demand, and Unemployment: Domestic and International Sources of Economic Activity.” American Political Science Review 79:1016–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Althaus, Scott L. 1998. “Information Effects in Collective Preferences.” American Political Science Review 92: 545–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, S.S., and Burns, T. 1996. “The European Union and the Erosion of Parliamentary Democracy: A Study of Post-Parliamentary Governance.” In Andersen, S.S. and Eliassen, K.A., eds. The European Union: How Democratic Is It?London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, Robert, Tilley, James and Heath, Anthony F.. 2005. “Political Knowledge and Enlightened Preferences: Party Choice Through the Electoral Cycle.” British Journal of Political Science 35: 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Cameron. 2006. “Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Individual-level Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science 50(2):446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, Christopher, and Gingrich, Jane. 2003. “Trends in Decentralization.” In Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J. and Scarrow, Susan E., eds. Democracy Transformed? Expanding Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies, pp. 140–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, Kevin. 2005. “Do Campaigns Help Voters Learn? A Cross-National Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 36:159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bagehot, Walter. 1867. The English Constitution. London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Bahl, Roy, and Wallace, Sally. 2005. “Public Financing in Developing and Transition Countries.” Public Budgeting & Finance 25(4s):83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, Ernest. “Burke and his Bristol Constituency,” in Essays on Government. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

Barnes, Samuel H. 1977. Representation in Italy: Institutionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2005. “Economic Inequality and Political Representation.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 2002. Revised August 2005.

Bartels, Larry M. 1993. “Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review 87(2):267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Build Up.” American Political Science Review 85(2):457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2002. “Positive and Negative Feedback in Politics,” In Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D., eds. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles. 1990. Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. 1989. First Principles Preparatory to the Constitutional Code, Schofield, Philip, ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berinsky, Adam J. 2004. Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bianco, William T. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birch, Anthony H. 2001. Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birch, Anthony H. 1971. Representation. New York: Praeger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, André, Blake, Donald and Dion, Stephane. 1996. “Do Parties Make a Difference? A Reappraisal.” American Journal of Political Science 40:514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, André, and Bodet, Marc André. 2006. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers?” Comparative Political Studies 39:1243–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blekesaune, Morten. 2007. “Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies.” European Sociological Review 23:393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, Henry E., and Johnston, Richard. 1987. “What's the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?” In Orren, Gary R. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds. Media and Momentum. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Brand, Jack. 1992. British Parliamentary Parties: Policy and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bratton, Kathleen A. and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61:658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratton, Kathleen A. and Ray, Leonard P.. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46(2):428–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brehm, John. 1993. The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Surveys and Political Representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Brody, Richard. 1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, Clem. 2006. “Voters, Satisficing and Public Policymaking: Recent Directions in the Study of Electoral Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology 32:191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: Public Opinion and the Future of Social Provision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2006. “Social Political Responsiveness in Developed Democracies.” American Sociological Review 71:474–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Joel E. 1990. “The Opinion-Policy Nexus in Germany.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54:508–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Joel E. 1987. “The Opinion-Policy Nexus in France – Do Institutions and Ideology Make a Difference?” Journal of Politics 49:465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Joel E. 1985. “Democratic Frustration in the Anglo-American Polities: A Quantification of Inconsistency between Mass Public Opinion, and Public Policy.” Western Political Quarterly 38:250–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budge, I., Robertson, D., and Hearl, D. eds. 1987. Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Burstein, Paul. 2006. “Why Estimates of the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy Are Too High,” Social Forces 84:2273–2290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burstein, Paul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56:29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burstein, Paul. 1979. “Some ‘Necessary Conditions’ for Popular Control of Public Policy: A Critique.” Polity 12:23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A. and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A. and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1979. “The House Is Not a Home: British MPs in Their Constituencies.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4(4):501–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1964. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne C. and Whiteley, Paul. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clausen, Aage R. 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar

Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Jeffrey E. 1999. Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policy-Making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Converse, Philip E. 1990. “Popular Representation and the Distribution of Information.” In Ferejohn, John A. and Kuklinski, James H., eds. Information and Democratic Processes, pp.369–388. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Apter, D. E., ed. Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–261. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Converse, Philip E. and Pierce, Roy. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowley, Philip. 2002. Revolts & Rebellions – Parliamentary Voting Under Blair. London: Politico.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Morgenstern, Scott. 2001. “Latin America's Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents.” Comparative Politics 33(2): 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutler, Fred. 1999. “Jeremy Bentham and the Public Opinion Tribunal.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63(3):321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 2000. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1970. Frontiers of Democratic Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1967. Pluralist Democracy in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carpini, Delli, Michael, X, and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Devine, Donald J. 1970. The Attentive Public: Polyarchical Democracy. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W. 1963. Nerves of Government. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Downs, Willam W. 1999. “Accountability Payoffs in Federal Systems? Competing Logics and Evidence from Europe's Newest Federation.” Publius 29: 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1956. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Druckman, James, and Jacobs, Lawrence. 2006. “Lumpers and Splitters: The Public Opinion Information That Politicians Collect and Use.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(4):453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durr, Robert H. 1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?” American Political Science Review 87(1):158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1980. “A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research 8:165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easton, David. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Easton, David. 1985. “Political Language and Political Reality.” PS: Political Science and Politics 18:10–19.Google Scholar

Eichenberg, Richard, and Stoll, Richard. 2003. “Representing Defense: Democratic Control of the Defense Budget in the United States and Western Europe.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47: 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisinger, Robert M. 2003. The Evolution of Presidential Polling. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Enns, Peter K. and Kellstedt, Paul M.. 2008. “Policy Mood and Political Sophistication: Why Everyone Moves Mood.” British Journal of Political Science 38:433–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1990. “Roll Calls, Reputations, and Representation in the U.S. Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15(4):623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1978. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data.” American Journal of Political Science 22:511–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., McIver, John P. and Wright, Gerald C.. 1987. “Political Parties, Public Opinion, and State Policy in the United States.” American Political Science Review 83:728–50.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy; Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. and Tedin, Kent L.. 2004. American Public Opinion. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Erickson, Lynda. 1997. “Might More Women Make a Difference? Gender, Party and Ideology among Canada's Parliamentary Candidates.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 30(4):663–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eulau, Heinz. 1967. “Changing Views of Representation.” In Sola Pol, Ithiel, ed. Contemporary Political Science: Toward Empirical Theory, pp. 53–85. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Eulau, Heinz and Karps, Paul D.. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2(3):233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eulau, Heinz, and Prewitt, Kenneth. 1973. Labyrinths of Democracy: Adaptations, Linkages, Representation, and Policies in Urban Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Fairlie, John A. 1940. “The Nature of Political Representation.” American Political Science Review 34(2):236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, J.A. 1990. “Information and the Electoral Process,” In Ferejohn, John, and Kuklinski, James, eds. Information and Democratic Processes. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, J.A., and Kuklinski, J.H. eds. 1990. Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Fiorina, Morris P. 1997. “Professionalism, Realignment, and Representation.” American Political Science Review 91:156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1973. “Electoral Margins, Constituency Influence, and Policy Moderation: a Critical Assessment.” American Politics Research 1:479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishkin, James S. 1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions For Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. 2006. “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3):533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fournier, Patrick. 2005. “Ambivalence and Attitude Change in Vote Choice: Do Campaign Switchers Experience Internal Conflict?” In Craig, Stephen C. and Martinez, Michael D., eds. Ambivalence, Politics, and Public Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Franklin, Mark N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Mark N. and Wlezien, C. 1997. “The Responsive Public: Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 9:347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Mark N., Brug, Wouter, and Eijk, Cees. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Electoral Responses to Economic Conditions in 15 Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Froman, Lewis A. 1963. Congressmen and Their Constituencies. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Gabel, Matthew, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2007. “Estimating the Effect of Elite Communications on Public Opinion Using Instrumental Variables.” American Journal of Political Science 51:1013–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gastil, John. 2000. “Is Face-to-Face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity?” Political Communication 17:357–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gay, Claudine. 2002. “Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4):717–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geer, John G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geer, John G. 1996. From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls: A Theory of Democratic Leadership. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23:409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65:778–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilens, Martin 2004. “Public Opinion and Democratic Responsiveness: Who Gets What They Want from Government?” Social Inequality Working Paper, Russell Sage Foundation.

Goggin, M., and Wlezien, C. 1993. “Abortion Opinion and Policy in the American States.” In Goggin, M., ed., Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, pp. 190–202. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google ScholarPubMed

Golder, Matt. 2005. “Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World 1946–2000.” Electoral Studies 24: 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gotell, Lise, and Brodie, Janine. 1996. “Women and Parties in the 1990s: Less than Even an Issue of Numbers.” In Thorbrun, Hugh G., ed. Party Politics in Canada, 7th ed. Scarborough, ON: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Graber, D. 1989. Mass Media and American Politics, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Griffin, J.D., and Newman, B. 2005. “Are Voters Better Represented?” Journal of Politics.

Groseclose, Tim. 2001. “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 45:862–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gulati, Girish J. 2004. “Revisiting the Link Between Electoral Competition and Policy Extremism in the U.S. Congress.” American Politics Research 32:495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1962. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Harrison, Kathryn. 1996. Passing the Buck: Federalism and Canadian Environmental Policy. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Hartley, Thomas, and Russett, Bruce. 1992. “Public Opinion and the Common Defence: Who Governs Military Spending in the United States?” American Political Science Review 86:905–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heise, D.R. 1969. “Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest Correlations.” American Sociological Review 34:93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heitshusen, Valerie, Young, Garry and Wood, David M.. 2005. “Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 49(1):32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, Edward S., and Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Hero, Rodney E., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 1995. “Latinos and Substantive Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent?” American Journal of Political Science 39(3):640–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrera, Cheryl Lyn, Herrera, Richard, and Smith, Eric R.A.N.. 1992. “Public Opinion and Congressional Representation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(2):185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbs, Douglas A. 1987. The American Political Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hill, Kim Q. and Hinton-Anderson, Angela. 1995. “Pathways of Representation: A Causal Analysis of Public Opinion-Policy Linkages.” American Journal of Political Science 39(4):924–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Kim Q., and Hurley, Patricia. A.. 2003. “Beyond the Demand-Input Model: A Theory of Representational Linkages.” Journal of Politics 65(2):304–26.Google Scholar

Hill, Kim Q., and Hurley, Patricia A.. 1999. “Dyadic Representation Reappraised.” American Journal of Political Science 43:109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobolt, Sara B., and Klemmensen, Robert. 2008. “Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 41:309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobolt, Sara B., and Klemmensen, Robert. 2005. “Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark.” Political Studies 53:379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holsti, Ole R. 1996. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Huber, John D. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. 1982. “Collective Representation Reappraised.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7(1):119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchings, Vincent L. 2003. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn About Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald and Abramson, Paul. 1994. “Economic Security and Value Change.” American Political Science Review 88:336–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Norpoth, Helmut and Hahn, Kyu S.. 2004. “Consumer Demand for Election News: The Horserace Sells.” Journal of Politics 66:157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackman, Simon, and Sniderman, Paul. 2002. “The Institutional Organization of Choice Spaces: A Political Conception of Political Psychology.” pp.209–223 In Monroe, Kristen, ed., Political Psychology. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. 1995. “The Rise of Presidential Polling: The Nixon White House in Historical Perspective.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59:163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. 1993. The Health of Nations: Public Opinion and the Making of Health Policy in the U.S. and Britain. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?” American Political Science Review 99:107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1995. “The Rise of Presidential Polling: The Nixon White House in Historical Perspective.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59:163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 2005. Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Jennings, I. 1959. Cabinet Government, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jennings, Will. 2009. “The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error-Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain 1994–2007.” British Journal of Poltical Science, 39(4):847–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jennings, Will, and John, Peter. 2009. “The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen's Speech in the United Kingdom 1960–2001.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4):838–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Richard. 2008. “Polarized Pluralism in the Canadian Party System: Presidential Address to the Canadian Political Science Association.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 41:815–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Richard, Blais, Andre, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Challenge of Direct Democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referendum. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, Richard, Brady, Henry E. and Crete, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Martin, Brace, Paul, and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2005. “Public Opinion and Dynamic Representation in the American States: The Case of Environmental Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly 86(1):87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., Baumgartner, Frank R. and True, James L.. 1998. “Policy Punctuations: U.S. Budget Authority 1947–1995.” Journal of Politics 60: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., Baumgartner, Frank R., Breunig, Christian, Wlezien, Christopher, Soroka, Stuart, Foucault, Martial, François, Abel, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, Koske, Chris, John, Peter, Mortensen, Peter B., Varone, Frédéric, Walgrave, Stefaan. 2009. “A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets: An Empirical Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4):855–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joumard, Isabelle, and Kongsrud, Per Mathis. 2003. “Fiscal Relations Across Government Levels.” OECD Economic Studies 36:155–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karol, David. 2007. “Has Polling Enhanced Representation? Unearthing Evidence from the Literary Digest Issue Polls.” Studies in American Political Development 21:16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, Richard S. 1997. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Nathan J. 2009. The Politics of Income Inequality in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, R.M., Saint-Germain, M.A. and Horn, J.D.. 1991. “Female Public Officials: A Different Voice?,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 515:77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, Brinck, and Miller, Will. 1997. “Latino Representation, It's Direct and Indirect.” American Journal of Political Science 41(3):1066–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, V.O., Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1960. New York: Vintage Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Anthony and Wybrow, Robert J.. 2001. British Political Opinion: 1937–2000, The Gallup Polls. London: Politico.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1973. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Krosnick, Jon. 1990. “Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior 12(1):59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krosnick, Jon. 1989. “Question Wording and Reports of Survey Results: The Case of Louis Harris and Associates and Aetna Life and Casualty.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53:107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. 1977. “District Competitiveness and Legislative Roll Call Behavior: A Reassessment of the Marginality Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 20:627–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. 1978. “Representation and Elections: A Policy Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72:165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuklinski, James, Quirk, Paul, Jerit, Jennifer, Schwieder, David and Rich, Robert. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Politics 62:790–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. 1993. “Group Representation in Canadian Politics.” In Equity and Community: The Charter, Interest Advocacy, and Representation. Seidle, F.L., ed. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar

Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1997. “Events, Equilibria, and Survival.” American Journal of Political Science 42:28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1968. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” In Linz, Juan and Valenzuela, Arturo, eds. Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter. 1925. The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “The Effect of Information on Voting Behavior and Electoral Outcomes: An Experimental Study of Direct Legislation.” Public Choice 78:65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and Strom, Kaare. 1995. “Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 89:648–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luskin, Robert C., Fishkin, James S., and Jowell, Roger. 2002. “Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 32:455–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacRae, Duncan, Jr. 1952. “The Relation Between Roll Call Votes and Constituencies in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 46(4):1046–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maestas, Cherie. 2000. “Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of Individuals and Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(4):663–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maestas, Cherie. 2003 “The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring among State Legislators.” Journal of Politics 65:439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan. 1999. “Elections and Representation.” In Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61(3):628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Manza, Jeff and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2002. “Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion: The State of the Debate.” In Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin I., eds. Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Matland, Richard E. and Studlar, Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway.” Journal of Politics 58(3):707–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, D.R., and Valen, H. 1999. Parliamentary Representation: The Case of the Norwegian Storting. Columbus: Ohio State Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1966. Party Loyalty among Congressmen: The Difference Between Democrats and Republicans 1947–1962. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrone, Donald J. and Kuklinski, James H.. 1979. “The Delegate Theory of Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 23:278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, Michael D., and Budge, Ian. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGann, Anthony, 2006. The Logic of Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mill, J.S. 1991 [1861]. Considerations on Representative Government in John Stuart Mill On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, A.H., Miller, W.E., Raine, A.S., and Browne, T.A. 1976. “A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election.” American Political Science Review 70:753–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E. 1967. “Voting and Foreign Policy.” Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. Rosenau, James N., ed. New York: Free Press. pp.213–230.Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E., Pierce, Roy, Thomassen, Jacques, Herrera, Richard, Holmberg, Soren, Esaiasson, Peter, and Wessels, Bernhard. 1999. Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57(1):45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monroe, Alan. 1998. “Public Opinion and Public Policy 1980–1993.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62:6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monroe, Alan. 1979. “Consistency between Constituency Preferences and National Policy Decisions.” American Politics Quarterly 12:3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morone, James A. and Marmor, Theodore R.. 1981. “Representing Consumer Interests: The Case of American Health Planning.” Ethics 91(3: Special Issue: Symposium on the Theory and Practice of Representation):431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, Shoon Kathleen. 2006. “Private Polls and Presidential Policymaking: Reagan as a Facilitator of Change.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 70(4): 477–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, Shoon Kathleen, and Howard, Peter. 2002. “Variation in White House Polling Operations: Carter to Clinton.” Public Opinion Quarterly 66:527–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Jack and Wlezien, Christpher. n.d. “Center-Party Strength and Major-Party Polarization in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.

Neuman, W. Russell. 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Norrander, Barbara and Wilcox, Clyde. 1999. “Public Opinion, and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 27:707–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle? Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Pippa. 1985. “Women's Legislative Representation in Western Europe.” West European Politics 8:90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2004. “Why Parties Fail to Learn: Electoral Defeat, Selective Perception and British Party Politics.” Party Politics 10(1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, Russell W. 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Newhouse, Joseph P. 1977. “Medical-Care Expenditure: A Cross-National Survey.” The Journal of Human Resources 12(1):115–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oldendick, Robert W. and Ann Bardes, Barbara. 1982. “Mass and Elite Foreign Policy Opinions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46(3):368–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, Benjamin I. 2002. “The Semi-Sovereign Public.” In Manza, J., Cook, F.L., & Page, B.I., eds. Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77:175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Persson, T., Roland, G., and Tabellini, G. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 1163–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petry, Francois. 1999. “The Opinion-Policy Relationship in Canada.” Journal of Politics 61:540–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petry, Francois and Mendelsohn, Matthew. 2004. “Public Opinion and Policy Making in Canada, 1995–2001.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 27:505–529.Google Scholar

Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pitkin, H.F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham, Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Views. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham, Jr., and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37:391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan Carol, and Manin, Bernard. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ranney, Austin. 1954. The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government: Its Origins and Present State. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Rae, Douglas. 1981. “Two Contradictory Ideas of (Political) Equality.” Ethics 91(3, Special Issue: Symposium on the Theory and Practice of Representation):451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasinski, Kenneth A. 1989. “The Effect of Question Wording on Public Support for Government Spending.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53: 388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Riker, William. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76(4):753–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodden, Jonathan. 2004. “Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: Meaning and Measurement.” Comparative Politics 36:481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodden, Jonathan. 2003. “Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government.” International Organization 57:695–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogowski, Ronald. 1981. “Representation in Political Theory and in Law.” Ethics 91(3, Special Issue):395–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogowski, Ronald, and Kayser, Mark Andreas. 2002. “Majoritarian Electoral Systems and Consumer Power: Price-Level Evidence from the OECD Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3):526–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosen, Harvey S. and Gayer, Ted. 2008. Public Finance, 8th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Rottinghaus, Brandon. 2006. “Rethinking Presidential Responsiveness: The Public Presidency and Rhetorical Congruency 1953–2001.” Journal of Politics 68(3):720–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1762. The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right.

Said, Edward W. 1997. Covering Islam: How the Media Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. Revised ed. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “When Are Interests Interesting?” American Political Science Review 75(3):701–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes, 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schattschneider, E.E. 1975 (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Schleiter, Petra, and Morgan-Jones, Edward. N.d. “Citizens, Presidents, and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism beyond Duverger and Linz.” British Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.

Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. “When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy,” European Journal of Political Research 30(2):155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Catherine R., Brady, David W., Brody, Richard A., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1990. “Linking Constituency Opinion and Senate Voting Scores: A Hybrid Explanation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15(4):599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Robert Y. and Young, John T.. 1986. “The Polls: Medical Care in the United States.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 50:418–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shapiro, Robert Y., Patterson, Kelly D., Russell, Judith and Young, John T.. 1987. “A Report: Employment and Social Welfare.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51:268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2005. “Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns.” French Politics 3:323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Thomas. 1987. “That Which We Call Welfare by Any Other Name Would Smell Sweeter: An Analysis of the Impact of Question Wording on Response Patterns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51:75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A. and Tetlock, Philip. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sniderman, Paul M., Fletcher, Joseph F., Russell, Peter H., Tetlock, Philip E. and Gaines, Brian J.. 1991. “The Fallacy of Democratic Elitism: Elite Competition and Commitment to Civil Liberties.” British Journal of Political Science 21(3):349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sniderman, Paul M. and Theriault, S.M.. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Sniderman, Paul M. and Saris, W.E., eds. Studies in Public Opinion, pp.133–165. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Soroka, Stuart. 2002. Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Soroka, Stuart, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2008. “On the Limits to Inequality in Representation.” P.S.: Political Science & Politics 41:319–327.Google Scholar

Soroka, Stuart, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “Opinion-Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom.” British Journal of Political Science 35:665–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soroka, Stuart, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37(3):531–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soroka, Stuart, Wlezien, Christopher, and McLean, Iain. 2006. “Public Expenditure in the U.K.: How Measures Matter.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (169):255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, Randolph T. 2001. “The Economy and Policy Mood: A Fundamental Dynamic of Democratic Politics?” American Journal of Political Science 45:620–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Still, Jonathan W. 1981. “Political Equality and Election Systems.” Ethics 91(3, Special Issue: Symposium on the Theory and Practice of Representation):375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Stimson, James A. 1989. “The Paradox of Ignorant Voters, But Competent Electorate.” In Perspectives on American and Texas Politics, Lutz, Donald and Tedin, Kent, eds. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar

Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B. and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89:543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Walter J. 1979. “Measuring Constituency-Representative Linkages: Problems and Prospects.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4(4):623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strøm, Kaare. 2003. “Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation.” In Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, eds. Strom, Kaare, Muller, Wolfgang, and Bergman, Torbjorn, 55–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Teixeira, Ruy A. 1992. The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar

Trudeau, Pierre E. 1968. Federalism and French Canadians. Toronto: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: KnopfGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ura, Joseph, and Ellis, Christopher. 2008. “Income, Preferences and the Dynamics of Policy Responsiveness.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41:785–794.Google Scholar

Uslaner, Eric M. and Weber, Ronald E.. 1979. “U.S. State Legislators' Opinions and Perceptions of Constituency Attitudes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4:563–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C., and Franklin, Mark N. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verba, Sidney and Nie, Norman H.. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Wahlke, John C. 1971. “Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented.” British Journal of Political Science 1(3):271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watts, Ronald L. 1999. Comparing Federal Systems. 2nd ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar

Weakliem, David. 2003. “Public Opinion Research and Political Sociology.” Research in Political Sociology 12:49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Ronald E. 1999. “The Quality of State Legislative Representation: A Critical Assessment,” The Journal of Politics 61:609–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, U. R. and Mayer, F. 1995. “European Democracy and its Critique.” West European Politics 18(3):4–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weissberg, Robert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 72:535–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weissberg, Robert. 1976. Public Opinion and Popular Government. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Welch, Susan and Hibbing, John. 1984. “Hispanics in Congress.” Social Science Quarterly 65:328–335.Google Scholar

Wiener, Norbert. 1961. Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal World. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem.’” Electoral Studies 24:555–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy.” Journal of Politics 66:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 1996a. “Dynamics of Representation: The Case of U.S. Spending on Defense.” British Journal of Political Science 26:81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 1996b. “The President, Congress, and Appropriations 1951–1985.” American Politics Research 24: 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39:981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher. 1993. “The Political Economy of Supplemental Appropriations.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 18: 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher, and Soroka, Stuart. n.d. “Inequality in Policy Responsiveness?” In Enns, Peter and Wlezien, Christopher, eds, Who Gets Represented?New York: Russell Sage Foundation, forthcoming.

Wlezien, Christopher, and Soroka, Stuart. 2007. “Relationships Between Public Opinion and Policy.” In Dalton, Russell and Klingemann, Hans-Deiter, eds. Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, pp.799–817. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wlezien, Christopher, and Soroka, Stuart. 2003. “Measures and Models of Budgetary Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 31:273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Gerald C. 1989. “Policy Voting in the U.S. Senate: Who Is Represented?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14:465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yagade, A. and Dozier, D. M.. 1990. “The Media Agenda-Setting Effect of Concrete versus Abstract Issues.” Journalism Quarterly 67:3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, John. 1998. “Monica Lewinsky's Contribution to Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31:182–9.Google Scholar

Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar