Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T11:41:20.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2023

Martin T. Dinter
Affiliation:
King's College London
Charles Guérin
Affiliation:
Université de Paris IV
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abascal Palazón, J. M. (1995). ‘Hallazgos arqueológicos y circulación monetaria: disfunciones metodológicas en el studio de la Hispania romana’, Actas del IX Congreso Nacional de Numismática. Elche.Google Scholar
Achard, G.(ed., trad.) (1989). Rhétorique à Herennius. Paris.Google Scholar
Achard, G. (ed., trad.) (1994). Ciceron: de l’Invention. Paris.Google Scholar
Achard, G. and Ledentu, M. (eds.) (2000). Orateur, auditeurs, lecteurs: à propos de l’éloquence romaine à la fin de la République et au début du Principat. Paris.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2013). Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afzelius, A. (1941). ‘Die politische Bedeutung des jüngeren Cato’, Classica et Mediaevalia 4: 100203.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. and Fantham, E. (ed. and trans.) (2007). Virgil. Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Alberini, C. M. (ed.) (2013). Memory Reconsolidation. Amsterdam and London.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alcock, S. (2002). Archaeologies of the Greek Past: Landscape, Monuments, and Memories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. (2005). ‘The Reconfigurations of Memory in the Eastern Roman Empire’, in Alcock, S., D’Altroy, T. N., Morrison, K. D. and Sinopoli, C. M. (eds.), Empires. Perspectives from Archaeology and History. Cambridge: 323–50.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C. (2004). ‘Toward a Theory of Cultural Trauma’, in Alexander, J. C., Eyerman, R., Giesen, B., Smelser, N. J. and Sztompka, P. (eds.), Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley: 130.Google Scholar
Alföldy, G. (1991). ‘Augustus und die Inschriften: Tradition und Innovation. Die Geburt der imperialen Epigraphik’, Gymnasium 98: 289324.Google Scholar
Almagro-Gorbea, M. (2009). ‘La moneda hispánica con jinete y cabeza varonil: ¿tradición indígena o creación romana?’, Zephyrvs 48: 235–66.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2000). Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley.Google Scholar
André, J.-M. (1992). ‘La retorica nelle prefazioni di Vitruvio: lo stato culturale della scienza, II’, in Scivoletto, N. (ed.), Prefazioni, Prologhi, Proemi di opera tecnico-scientifiche latine, II. Freiburg im Breisgau and Rome: 861916.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. (2014). ‘Remembering with Greek Masterpieces. Observations on Memory and Roman Copies’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, Suppl. 10. Ann Arbor: 117–36.Google Scholar
Anselm, S. (2004). Struktur und Transparenz. Eine literaturwissenschaftliche Analyse der Feldherrnviten des Cornelius Nepos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Arciniega, A. P. and del Hoyo, A. Ñ. (1999). ‘Moneda e historia monetaria en la Hispania republicana: economía, política, fiscalidad?’, Studia historica. Historia Antigua 17: 193242.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2012). Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arend, W. (1933). Die typischen Scenen bei Homer. Berlin.Google Scholar
Arkins, B. T. (1989). ‘Language in Propertius 4.6’, Philologus: Zeitschrift für antike Literatur und ihre Rezeption 133: 246–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud-Portelli, A. (2004). ‘Carthage, le fonctionnement d’une métropole régionale à l’époque romaine’, Cahiers de la Méditerranée 64: 2337.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1979). Menander. Vol. I (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Arweiler, A. H. and Gauly, B. M. (eds.) (2008). Machtfragen. Zur kulturellen Repräsentation und Konstruktion von Macht in Antike, Mittelalter und Neuzeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. (1995). ‘Funktionsgedächtnis und Speichergedächtnis: Zwei Modi der Erinnerung’, in Platt, K. and Dabag, M. (eds.), Generation und Gedächtnis: Erinnerungen und kollektive Identitäten. Opladen: 169–85.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. (1997). ‘Gedächtnis, Erinnerung’, in Bergmann, K., Fröhlich, K. and Kuhn, A. (eds.), Handbuch der Geschichtsdidaktik. Seelze-Velber: 33–7.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. (1999). Erinnerungsräume. Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. Munich.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. (2008). ‘Canon and Archive’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin and Boston: 97107.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. (2010). Erinnerungsräume: Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses, 5th edition. Munich.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. (2011a). Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. (2011b). Cultural Memory and Western Civilization. Art of Memory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. (2018). ‘One Land and Three Narratives: Palestinian Sites of Memory in Israel’, Memory Studies 11: 287300.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. and Assmann, J. (1994). ‘Das Gestern im Heute. Medien und soziales Gedächtnis’, in Merten, K., Schmidt, S. J. and Weischenberg, S. (eds.), Die Wirklichkeit der Medien: eine Einführung in die Kommunikationswissenschaft. Wiesbaden: 114–40.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (1988). ‘Kollektives Gedächtnis und kulturelle Identität’, in Assmann, J. and Hölscher, T. (eds.), Kultur und Gedächtnis. Frankfurt: 9–19.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (1992). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assmann, J. (1997). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Second corrected edition. Munich.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2001). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2003). ‘Cultural Memory: Script, Recollection and Political Identity in Early Civilizations’, Historiography East and West 1.2: 154–77.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2005). ‘Das kollektive Gedächtnis zwischen Körper und Schrift. Zur Gedächtnistheorie von Maurice Halbwachs’, in Krapoth, H. and Laborde, D. (eds.), Erinnerung und Gesellschaft. Mémoire et Société. Hommage à Maurice Halbwachs (1877–1945). Wiesbaden: 6583.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2006a). Religion and Cultural Memory: Ten Studies. Stanford.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2006b). Thomas Mann und Ägypten: Mythos und Monotheismus in den Josephsromanen. Munich.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2008). ‘Communicative and Cultural Memory’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin and New York: 109–19.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. and Assmann, J. (1988). ‘Schrift, Tradition und Kultur’, in Raible, W. (ed.), Zwischen Festtag und Alltag. Zehn Beiträge zum Thema Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Tübingen: 2550.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. and Czaplicka, J. (1995). ‘Collective Memory and Cultural Identity’, New German Critique 65: 125–33.Google Scholar
Astbury, R. (2002). 2. M. Terentii Varronis Saturarum Menippearum fragmenta. Munich.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. (1978). Cato the Censor. Oxford.Google Scholar
Atsabè, A. S. (1950). ‘Exegi monumentum’, Platon 2. 2: 1524.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (2000). ‘Dikaiarchs Bios Hellados und Varros De vita populi Romani’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 143: 337–69.Google Scholar
Azoulay, V. and Lloyd, J. (2017). The Tyrant-Slayers of Ancient Athens. A Tale of Two Statues. Oxford.Google Scholar
Babcock, C. L. (1967). ‘Horace, Carm. I. 32 and the Dedication of the Temple of Apollo Palatinus’, Classical Philology 62. 3: 189–94.Google Scholar
Backendorf, D. (1998). Römische Münzschätze des Zweiten und Ersten Jahrhunderts v. Chr. vom Italienischen Festland. Berlin.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1984a). ‘The Death of Saturninus: Studies in Chronology and Prosopography’, Chiron 14: 101–47.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1984b). ‘The House of the Servilii Gemini: A Study in the Misuse of Occam’s Razor’, Papers of the British School at Rome 52: 4971.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (1993). ‘Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization and “Presence” in Homeric Poetry’, Classical Antiquity 12. 1: 129.Google Scholar
Bakshi, A. (2014). ‘Urban Form and Memory Discourses: Spatial Practices in Contested Cities’, Journal of Urban Design 19: 189210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, B. (1990). ‘The Date, Identity and Career of Vitruvius’, Latomus 49: 425–34.Google Scholar
Balmaceda, C. (2017). Virtus Romana: Politics and Morality in the Roman Historians. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Balot, R. K. (1998). ‘Pindar, Virgil, and the Proem to Georgic 3’, Phoenix 52: 8394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, P. and Harper, T. (2010). Magnificent Maps: Power, Propaganda and Art. Reggio Emilia.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997). The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. (1962). Nevio Epico. Storia, Interpretazione, Edizione critica dei frammenti del primo epos latino. Padova.Google Scholar
Baroni, A. (2007). ‘La titolatura della dittatura di Silla’, Athenaeum 95: 775–92.Google Scholar
Barringer, J. (1994). ‘The Mythological Paintings in the Macellum at Pompeii’, Classical Antiquity 13: 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrios-Lech, P. (2016). Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1994). Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Revealing Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Basu, L. (2009). ‘Towards a Memory Dispositif: Truth, Myth and the Ned Kelly “Lieu de Memoire”’, in Erll, A. and Rigney, A. (eds.), Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin and New York: 139-56.Google Scholar
Basu, L. (2012). Ned Kelly as Memory Dispositif: Media, Time, Power, and the Development of Australian Identities. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (2005). ‘Plautine Farce and Plautine Freedom: An Essay on the Value of Metatheatre’, in Batstone, W. W. and Tissol, G. (eds.), Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature. New York: 1346.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (2007). ‘Literature’, in N. Rostenstein and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Chichester, UK and Malden, MA: 543–64.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. and Damon, C. (2006). Caesar’s Civil War. New York. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudrillard, J. (1995). The Gulf War Did not Take Place. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2002). ‘Ciceronian Correspondences: Making a Book out of Letters’, in Wiseman, T. P. (ed.) (2002), Classics in Progress. Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome. Oxford: 103–44.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2007). The Roman Triumph. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. R. F. (1998a). Religions of Rome I: A History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. R. F. (1998b). Religions of Rome II: A Sourcebook. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beck, H. and Wiemer, H. U. (2009). Feiern und Erinnern: Geschichtsbilder im Spiegel antiker Feste. Berlin.Google Scholar
Beck, H. Duplá, Jehne, A., M. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.) (2011). Consuls and res publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beltràn Lloris, F. (1999). ‘Writing, Language and Society: Iberians, Celts and Romans in Northeastern Spain in the 2nd and 1st Centuries BC’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 43. 1: 131–51.Google Scholar
Benardete, S. (1987). ‘Cicero’s De Legibus I: Its Plan and Intention’, American Journal of Philology 108. 2: 295309.Google Scholar
Benner, H. (1987). Die Politik des P. Clodius Pulcher (Historia Einzelschriften 50). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Benseddik, N. (2010). ‘Esculape et Hygie en Afrique’, Memoirs de l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres 44. Paris.Google Scholar
Béranger, J. (1972). ‘Les jugements de Cicéron sur les Gracques’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 1: 732–63.Google Scholar
Bergk, T. (1884). ‘Anecdoton Parisinum’, in Peppmüller, R. (ed.), Kleine philologische Schriften. Halle: 1: 580612.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (1995). Greek Masterpieces and Roman Recreative Fictions’, HSCPh 97: 79120.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. (1998). Die Strahlen der Herrscher. Theomorphes Herrscherbild und politische Symbolik im Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Mainz.Google Scholar
Berry, D. (2004). ‘The Publication of Cicero’s pro Roscio Amerino’, Mnemosyne 57.1: 80–7.Google Scholar
Berthold, H. (1971). ‘Cato von Utica im Urteil der Zeitgenossen’, in Kumaniecki, K. (ed.), Acta Conventus XI ‘Eirene’. Wrocław: 129–41.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1978). ‘Su alcuni modelli antropologici della Roma più arcaica: designazioni linguistiche e pratiche cultuali’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 1: 123–75.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1986). Antropologia e cultura romana: parentela, tempo, immagini dell’anima. Rome.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2000). Le orecchie di Hermes. Turin.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2009). Affari di famiglia, la parentela nella letteratura e nella cultura antica. Bologna.Google Scholar
Biggs, T. (2017). ‘Primus Romanorum: Origin Stories, Fictions of Primacy, and the First Punic War’, Classical Philology 112. 3: 350–67.Google Scholar
Biggs, T. (2020a). Poetics of the First Punic War. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Biggs, T. (2020b). ‘Allegory and Authority in Latin Verse-Historiography’, in Farrell, J. and Damon, C. (eds.), Ennius’ Annals: Poetry and History. Cambridge: 91–106.Google Scholar
Binder, G. (2003). ‘Verkehrte Welt: Gott Mercurius als Mensch in Rom? Gedanken zu Horaz, Carmen 1, 2’, in Binder, G., Effe, B. and Glei, R. F. (eds.), Gottmenschen: Konzepte existentieller Grenzüberschreitungen im Altertum. Trier: 4565.Google Scholar
Blanck, H. (1969). Wiederverwendung alter Statuen als Ehrendenkmäler bei Griechen und Römern. Rome.Google Scholar
Blank, D. (2008). ‘Varro and the Epistemological Status of Etymology’, Histoire, épistémologie, langage 30: 4973.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (1974). ‘Das Bild der Komödie in der späten Republik’, in Reinhardt, U. and Sallmann, K. (eds.), Musa Iocosa: Arbeiten über Humor und Witz, Komik und Komödie der Antike. Hildesheim: 141–57.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J., Büchner, K. and Morel, W. (2010). Fragmenta poetarum Latinorum epicorum et lyricorum. Berlin.Google Scholar
Blázquez, J. M. (1978). Historia económica de la Hispania romana. Madrid.Google Scholar
Blázquez, J. M. (1996). Las explotaciones mineras y la romanización de Hispania. Madrid.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (1992). Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. (2000). ‘Mos maiorum: Von der Familientradition zum Nobilitätsethos: Die Geschichte des Begriffes mos maiorum von den Anfängen bis zu Cicero’, in Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.), Mos maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik. Stuttgart: 2598.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. (2003). ‘Die memoria der gentes als Rückgrat der kollektiven Erinnerung im republikanischen Rom’, in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (eds.), Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius. Darmstadt: 5372.Google Scholar
Bodnar, J. (1992). Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century. Princeton.Google Scholar
Böhme, C. (1995). Princeps und Polis. Untersuchungen zur Herrschaftsform des Augustus über bedeutende Orte Griechenlands. Munich.Google Scholar
Bollmann, B. (1998). Römische Vereinshäuser. Untersuchungen zu den Scholae der römischen Berufs-, Kult- und Augustalen-Kollegien in Italien. Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar
Bolter, J. D. and Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. (1957). Die Fasten I: Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. (1958). Die Fasten II: Herausgegeben, übersetzt und kommentiert von Franz Bömer. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bommas, M. (ed.) (2011a). Cultural Memory and Identity in Ancient Societies. London and New York.Google Scholar
Bommas, M. (2011b). ‘Introduction’, in Bommas, M. (ed.), Cultural Memory and Identity in Ancient Societies. London and New York: 19.Google Scholar
Bommas, M. (2011c). ‘Pausanias’ Egypt’, in Bommas, M. (ed.), Cultural Memory and Identity in Ancient Societies. London and New York: 79–108.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1960). ‘Anecdoton Parisinum’, Hermes 88: 354–60.Google Scholar
Bookidis, N. (2005). ‘Religion in Corinth: 146 BCE to 100 CE’, in Schowalter, D. N. and Friesen, S. J. (eds.), Urban Religion in Roman Corinth. Interdisciplinary Approaches. Cambridge, MA: 141–64.Google Scholar
Börker, C. (1990). ‘Forum und Capitolium von Korinth. Zur Planung einer römischen Kolonie in Griechenland’, in Börker, C. (ed.), Das antike Rom und der Osten. Festschrift für Klaus Parlasca zum 65. Geburtstag. Erlangen: 118.Google Scholar
Bowditch, L. (2009). ‘Palatine Apollo and the Imperial Gaze: Propertius 2.31 and 2.32’, American Journal of Philology 130.3: 401–38.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. and Wertsch, J. V. (eds.) (2009). Memory in Mind and Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. A. (1969). ‘A Eurasian Hunting Ritual’, Folklore 80: 1216.Google Scholar
Bradley, J. R. (1991). The Sources of Cornelius Nepos. Selected Lives. New York and London.Google Scholar
Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) (2003). Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K. (2002). ‘Von der res publica amissa zur res publica restituta. Zu zwei Schlagworten aus der Zeit zwischen Republik und Monarchie’, in Spielvogel, J. (ed.), Res publica reperta. Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats (Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag). Stuttgart: 113–23.Google Scholar
Brink, S. (1997). ‘Names and Naming’, in Rodriguez, J. P. (ed.), The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery, Vol. 1. Santa Barbara: 454–6.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (1991). Titi Livi Ab urbe condita. Libri XXXI–XL. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2008). A Commentary on Livy, Books 38–40. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2006). Cicero: On Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1951–52). The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. New York.Google Scholar
Brown, F. E. (1963). ‘Vitruvius and the Liberal Art of Architecture’, Bucknell Review 9: 99107.Google Scholar
Brown, R. D. (1991). ‘Catonis Nobile Letum” and the List of Romans in Horace “Odes” 1.12’, Phoenix 45.4: 326–40.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1971). Italian Manpower, 225 B.C.– A.D. 14. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bruun, C. (2009). ‘Civic Rituals in Imperial Ostia’, in Hekster, O., Schmidt-Hofner, S. and Witschel, C. (eds.), Ritual Dynamics and Religious Change in the Roman Empire. Leiden and Boston: 123–41.Google Scholar
Bruun, C. (forthcoming). Population, Society, and Identities in Roman Ostia.Google Scholar
Buccheri, A (2017). ‘The Metaphorical Structuring Kinship’, in Short, W. M. (ed.), Embodiment in Latin Semantics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: 141–76.Google Scholar
Bücher, F. (2006). Verargumentierte Geschichte. Exempla Romana im politischen Diskurs der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1961). ‘Catull an Cato von Utica (c. 56)’, Hermes 89: 345–56.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1975). ‘Ciceros Kritik an Sulla in der Rede für Roscius aus Ameria’, Hermes 24, 570–91.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1993). Marcus Tullius Cicero. Der Staat. Lateinisch und Deutsch. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, L. H. (1988). Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Burden-Strevens, C. (2019). ‘The Republican Dictatorship: An Imperial Perspective’, in Osgood, J. and Baron, C. (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Republic. Leiden: 131–57.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, D. W. P. and Van Waarden, J. A. (eds.), Emperors and Historiography: Collected Essays on the Literature of the Roman Empire by Daniël den Hengst. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. (2005). ‘The Roman West and the Roman East’, in Howgego, C., Heuchert, V. and Burnett, A. (eds.), Coinage and Identity in the Roman Provinces. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burton, P. J. (2000). ‘The Last Republican Historian: A New Date for the Composition of Livy’s First Pentad’, Historia 49: 429–46.Google Scholar
Butler, H. E. and Barber, E. A. (1933). The Elegies of Propertius (Edited with a Commentary). Oxford.Google Scholar
Butler, J. H. (1972). The Theatre and Drama of Greece and Rome. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1986). ‘Propertius and the Battle of Actium (4.6)’, in Woodman, T. and West, D. (eds.), Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: 129–68.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. and Gros, P. (1999). Vitruve: de l’architecture. Livre II. Paris.Google Scholar
Calza, R. (1964). I ritratti I. Ritratti greci e romani fino a 160 circa d.C. (Scavi di Ostia V). Rome.Google Scholar
Calza, R. (1978). I ritratti II. Ritratti romani dal 160 circa alla metà del III secolo d.C. (Scavi di Ostia IX). Rome.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. (2014). Humanismus – Ein Offenes System: Beiträge Zur Humanistik. Aschaffenburg.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. and Mohr, H. (1990). ‘Erinnerung / Gedächtnis’, in Cancik, H., Gladigow, B. and Laubscher, M. (eds.), Handbuch religionswissenschaftlicher Grundbegriffe, Vol. 2. Stuttgart, Berlin and Cologne: 299323.Google Scholar
Caplan, H. (1954). [Cicero] Rhetorica ad Herennium, trans. and introduction. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cardauns, B. (1976). Marcus Terentius Varro. Antiquitates Rerum Divinarum. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Cardauns, B. (2001). Marcus Terentius Varro. Einführung in sein Werk. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Carlsen, J. (2006). The Rise and Fall of a Roman Noble Family. The Domitii Ahenobarbi 196 BC–AD 68. Odense.Google Scholar
Caruso, C. and Papi, C. (2005). ‘L’iscrizione di Porta Romana a Ostia: verifiche e proposte’, Archeologia Classica 56: 461–9.Google Scholar
Cary, E. (1971) [1940]. Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Roman Antiquities III, Book V–VI. (Loeb edition). Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Cavaggioni, F. (1998). L. Apuleio Saturnino. Tribunus plebis seditiosus. Memoria presentata dal s. c. Maria Capozza nell’adunanza ordinaria del 24 maggio 1997. Venice.Google Scholar
Cave, T. (1988). Recognitions: A Study in Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cèbe, J. P. (1996). Varron. Satires Ménippées 11. Rome and Paris.Google Scholar
Cébeillac-Gervasoni, M., Caldelli, M. L. and Zevi, F. (2010). Epigrafia latina. Ostia: cento iscrizioni in contesto. Rome.Google Scholar
Chaves Tristán, F. (1990). ‘Los hallazgos numismáticos y el desarrollo de la Segunda Guerra Púnica en el sur de la Península Ibérica’, Latomus 49: 613–22.Google Scholar
Chaves Tristán, F. (1996). Los tesoros en el sur de Hispania: conjuntos de denarios y objetos de plata durante los siglos II y I aC Fundación el Monte. Sevilla.Google Scholar
Chiu, A. (2016). Ovid’s Women of the Year: Narratives of Roman Identity in the Fasti. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Chrissanthos, S. G. (2004). ‘Freedom of Speech and the Roman Republican Army’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: 341–68.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. (2000). Plautus: Amphitruo. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. (2010). Roman Comedy: Five Plays by Plautus and Terence, transl. with introd. and notes. Newburyport, MA.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. M. (2019). Plautus: Casina. London.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2000). ‘The Memory of Philippi in Horace and the Interpretation of Epistle 1.20.23’, The Classical Journal 96 .1: 2756.Google Scholar
Claridge, A. (2010). Rome: An Oxford Archaeological Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, A. J. (2007). Divine Qualities: Cult and Community in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. (1991). The Houses of Roman Italy, 100 B.C.–A.D. 250. Ritual, Space, and Decoration. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1981). Brutus: The Noblest Roman. London.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. (1986). ‘Cicero and the New Poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 90: 159–70.Google Scholar
Clini, P. (ed.) (2014). Vitruvio e l’archeologia. Venice.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1981). L’Area sacra di Largo Argentina. Rome.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1985). Il Foro Romano: Periodo repubblicano e augusteo. Rome.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1996). Il Campo Marzio: Dalle origini alla fine della Repubblica. Rome.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1996a). ‘Iuppiter Feretrius, Aedes’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 3.: 135–6.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1996b). ‘Lares Permarini, Aedes’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 3.: 174–5.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (2012). Palatium. Rome.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (2021). Ostia repubblicana. Rome.Google Scholar
Cole, S. (2013). Cicero and the Rise of Deification at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Collart, J. (1954). Varron. De lingua latina. Livre V. Paris.Google Scholar
Connerton, P. (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Connerton, P. (2009). How Modernity Forgets. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Connor, P. J. (1978). ‘The Actian Miracle. Propertius 4.6’, Ramus. Critical Studies in Greek and Latin Literature 7: 110.Google Scholar
Connor, C. (2005). ‘Epic Allusions in Roman Satire’, in Freudenburg, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge: 123–45.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (2016). ‘Nothing to Do with Fides?: Female Networks and the Reproduction of Citizenship in Plautus’ Casina’, in Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. and Manuwald, G. (eds.), Roman Drama and its Contexts. Berlin and Boston: 275–88.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (ed.) (2011). Virgil: Georgics. Berlin.Google Scholar
Cooley, A. E. (2012). The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2002). ‘Rhetorical Education in Cicero’s Youth’, in May, J. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden: 197218.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2005). ‘Gesture in Early Roman Law: Empty Forms or Essential Formalities?’, in Cairns, D. (ed.), Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Swansea: 157–73.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2015). Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Corbier, M. (2006). Donner à voir, donner à lire: Mémoire et communication dans la Rome ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1986). ‘The Formation of the Historical Tradition of Early Rome’, in Moxon, I., Smart, J. and Woodman, A. (eds.), Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Cambridge: 6786.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1995). Beginnings of Rome. London.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (2009). ‘Cato the Elder and the Origins of Roman Autobiography’, in Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography. Swansea: 1540.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (ed.) (2013). The Fragments of the Roman Historians. 3 volumes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Corning, A. and Schuman, H. (2015). Generations and Collective Memory. Chicago.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. (2015). Brutus: Caesar’s Assassin. Barnsley.Google Scholar
Courrént, M. (1998). ‘Vitruve lecteur de Cicéron: le “De Oratore” et la définition vitruvienne de l’architecture comme ars’, Euphrosyne 26: 2534.Google Scholar
Courrént, M. (2001). ‘La construction du savoir par la confrontation interdisciplinaire: l’imaginaire vitruvien’, in Courrént, M. and Thomas, J. (eds.), Imaginaire et modes de construction du savoir antique dans les textes scientifiques et techniques. Perpignan: 123–43.Google Scholar
Courrént, M. (2005). ‘Demonstrare atque explicare: la fonction de l’ecrit dans le De Architectura de Vitruve’, Pallas 69: 299306.Google Scholar
Courrier, C. (2014). La plèbe de Rome et sa culture (fin du IIe siècle av. J.-C.-fin du Ier siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1993). The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. (2007). The Headless City: The Decline and Fall of Capua in Silius Italicus’ Punica. Oxford University Research Archive.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. (2015). ‘240 BCE and All That: The Romanness of Republican Tragedy’, in Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Roman Tragedy. Leiden: 6392.Google Scholar
Craig, C. (1986). ‘Cato’s Stoicism and the Understanding of Cicero’s Speech for Murena’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 116: 229–39.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W. (1994). M. Tullius Cicero. The Fragmentary Speeches. 2nd ed. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (1973). ‘Foedus and Sponsio’, Papers of the British School at Rome 41: 17.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (1974). Roman Republican Coinage. Vol. 1. London and New York.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (1985). Coinage and Money under the Roman Republic. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (1996). ‘Roman Statutes II’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London Suppl. 64.2. London.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (2011). Imagines Italicae. London.Google Scholar
Crinson, M. (2005). ‘Urban Memory: An Introduction’, in Crinson, M. (ed.), Urban Memory: History and Amnesia in the Modern City. London and New York: XIXX.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. (1987). ‘Is the Threat-Monologue of the “Servus Currens” an Index of Roman Authorship?Phoenix 41.4: 399419.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. and Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (2001). Opere di Marco Porcio Catone Censore, Vol. II. Turin.Google Scholar
Curchin, L. (1990). The Local Magistrates of Roman Spain. Toronto.Google Scholar
Curchin, L. (1991). Roman Spain: Conquest and Assimilation. London.Google Scholar
Curchin, L. (1995). ‘Literacy in the Roman Provinces: Qualitative and Quantitative Data from Central Spain’, American Journal of Philology 116 .3: 461–76.Google Scholar
Damon, C. (2010). ‘Déjà vu or déjà lu? History as Intertext’, in Cairns, F. and Griffin, M. (eds.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar XIV, Florida and Cambridge: 375–88.Google Scholar
Dart, C. J. and Vervaet, F. J. (2011). ’The Significance of the Naval Triumph in Roman History (260–29 BCE)’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 176: 267–80.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1980). ‘Maiorum exempla sequi: l’exemplum historique dans les discours judiciaires de Cicéron’, Mélanges de l’école française de Rome 92: 6786.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1998a). ‘Les enjeux de l’exemplarité à la fin de la République et au début du Principat’, in David, J.-M. (ed.), Valeurs et mémoire à Rome. Valère Maxime ou la vertu recompose. Paris: 917.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (1998b). ‘Valère Maximus et l’histoire de la République romaine’, in David, J.-M. (ed.), Valeurs et mémoire à Rome. Valère Maxime ou la vertu recomposée, Paris: 119–30.Google Scholar
Davies, P. (2017). Architecture and Politics in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (2010). ‘Carthage, Corinth, and 146 BCE: Shifting Paradigms of Roman Imperium’, in Digeser, E. and Thomas, C. (eds.), Beyond Borders: Selected Proceedings of the 2010 Ancient Borderlands International Graduate Student Conference. Santa Barbara: 112.Google Scholar
De Angeli, S. (1996). ‘Iuppiter Optimus Maximus Capitolinus, Aedes (Fasi Tardo–Repubblicane e di Età Imperiale)’, in E. M. Steinby (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 3: 148–53.Google Scholar
De Martino, M. (2018). Flāmen-brahmán: La forza montante della fiamma sacra. Rome.Google Scholar
De Robertis, F. M. (1955). Il fenomeno associativo nel mondo romano. Dai collegi della Repubblica alle corporazioni del Basso Impero. Rome.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. (1931–63). Inscriptiones Italiae. 13 vols. Rome.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. (1954). Fasti Capitolini. Turin.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. (1963). Inscriptiones Italiae: Fasti et Elogia, Vol. 13.2. Rome.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1992). ‘What Is a Dispositif?’, in Armstrong, T. J. (ed.), Michel Foucault, Philosopher: Essays. New York: 159–68.Google Scholar
Del Giovane, B. (2021). ‘“Non è una città per vecchi.” Per una rilettura del Sexagessis di Varrone’, Aevum Antiquum N.S. 21: 207–43.Google Scholar
Delignon, B. (2012), ‘Mythes archaïques et mythes alexandrins dans les Odes d’Horace: valeur politique d’une double réception’, in Cusset, C., Levin, F. and Le Meur, N. (eds.), Mythe et pouvoir à l’époque hellénistique. Leuven: 453–68.Google Scholar
Delignon, B. (2019). La morale de l’amour dans les Odes d’Horace. Poésie, philosophie et politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Delle Corte, F. (1986). Virgilio. Le Georgiche. 2 vols. Genova.Google Scholar
Deneauve, J. (1990). ‘Le centre monumental de Carthage. Un ensemble cultuel sur la colline de Byrsa’, in Carthage et son territoire dans l’antiquité. Actes du 4e colloque international sur l’histoire et l’archéologie de l’Afrique du Nord, Strasbourg, 5-9 avril 1988. Paris: 143–55.Google Scholar
Dettenhofer, M. H. (2000). Herrschaft und Widerstand im augusteischen Prinzipat. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dickenson, C. P. (2017). On the Agora. The Evolution of a Public Space in Hellenistic and Roman Greece (c. 323 BC to 267 AD). Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T. D., Kuin, I. N. I, Moser, M. and Weidgenannt, D. (eds.) (2017). Strategies of Remembering in Greece under Rome (100 BC–100 AD). Publications of the Netherlands Institute at Athens VI. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. T. (2011). ‘Inscriptional Intermediality in Latin Elegy’, in Keith, A. (ed.), Latin Elegy and Hellenistic Epigram: A Tale of Two Genres at Rome. Cambridge: 718.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. T. (2012). Anatomizing Civil War: Studies in Lucan’s Epic Technique. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. T. (2013a). ‘Inscriptional Intermediality in Latin Literature’, in Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.), Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford: 303–16.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. T. (2013b). ‘Intermediality in Latin Epic: en video quaecumque audita’, in Lovatt, H. and Vout, C. (eds.), Epic Visions: Visuality in Greek and Latin Epic and Its Reception. Cambridge: 122–38.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. T. (2020). ‘Comic Technique in Plautus’ Asinaria and Casina’, in Dutsch, D. and Franko, G. F. (eds.), A Companion to Plautus: Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Hoboken: 269–86.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. T. and Khoo, A. (2019). ‘Messenger Scenes in Greek Epic’, in Reitz, C. and Finkmann, S. (eds.), Structures of Epic Poetry. Berlin and Boston: 481500.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. T. and Reitz-Joosse, B. (eds.) (2019). ‘Intermediality – Special Issue’, Trends in Classics 11(1).Google Scholar
Dionisotti, A. C. (1988). ‘Nepos and the Generals’, Journal of Roman Studies 78: 3549.Google Scholar
Docter, R. F., Boussoffara, R. and Ter Keurs, P. (eds.) (2015). Carthage. Fact and Myth. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dolganov, A. (2008). ‘Constructing Author and Authority: Generic Discourse in Cicero’s De Legibus’, Greece and Rome 55: 2338.Google Scholar
Domingo Gygax, M. (2016). Benefactors and Rewards in the Ancient City. The Origins of Euergeticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1960). ‘Clausulae in the Rhetorica ad Herennium as Evidence of its Date’, Classical Quarterly 10: 6578.Google Scholar
Dowling, M. (2006). Clemency and Cruelty in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dragstedt, A. (1969). ‘Cato’s Politeuma’, Agon 3: 6996.Google Scholar
Drogula, F. K. (2019). Cato the Younger: Life and Death at the End of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. (1971). The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton.Google Scholar
Duff, J. D. (1928). Lucan. Pharsalia (‘The Civil War’). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2014). ‘Non sine causa sed sine fine: Cicero’s Compulsion to Repeat His Consulate’, The Classical Journal 110: 922.Google Scholar
Dumézil, G. (1935). Flamen-Brahman. Paris.Google Scholar
Dumézil, G. (1970). Archaic Roman Religion. Chicago.Google Scholar
Dumézil, G. (1988). Mitra-Varuna. Chicago.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. (1974). The Economy of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Duplá, A. (2011). ‘Consules populares’, in Beck, H., Duplá, A Jehne, M and Polo, F.Pina (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: 279–98.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2002). ‘The “Other” Pro Milone Reconsidered’, Philologus 146: 182–5.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2003). ‘Evidence and Rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino: the case against Sextus Roscius’, The Classical Quarterly 53.1, 235–46.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2004). A Commentary on Cicero’s De Legibus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2010). Cicero Pro Roscio Amerino. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ebel, D. (1976). Transalpine Gaul: The Emergence of a Roman Province. Leiden.Google Scholar
Ebeling, K. (2010). ‘Historischer Raum: Archiv und Erinnerungsort’, in Günzel, S. (ed.), Raum. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Stuttgart and Weimar: 121–33.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (2016). ‘The Emperor, the Law and Imperial Administration’, in du, P. J. Plessis, C. Ando and Tuori, K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society. Oxford: 98110.Google Scholar
Eckert, A. (2014). ‘Remembering Cultural Trauma. Sulla’s Proscriptions, Roman Responses and Christian Perspectives’, in Becker, E., Dochhorn, J. and Holt, E. (eds.), Trauma and Traumatization in Individual and Collective Dimensions. Insights from Biblical Studies and Beyond. Göttingen: 262–74.Google Scholar
Eckert, A. (2016a). Lucius Cornelius Sulla in der antiken Erinnerung: Jener Mörder, der sich Felix nannte. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Eckert, A. (2016b). ‘“There Is Nobody Who Does Not Hate Sulla”: Emotion, Persuasion and Cultural Trauma’, in Sanders, E. and Johncock, M. (eds.), Emotion and Persuasion in Classical Antiquity. Stuttgart: 133–45.Google Scholar
Eckert, A. (2018a). ‘Roman Orators between Greece and Rome. The Case of Cato the Elder, L. Crassus and M. Antonius’, in Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A. and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory. Reconstructions, Contexts and Receptions. Oxford: 1932.Google Scholar
Eckert, A. (2018b). ‘Good Fortune and the Public Good: Disputing Sulla’s Claim to be Felix’, in van der Blom, H., Gray, C. and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome. Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge: 283–98.Google Scholar
Eckert, A. (2019). ‘Reconsidering the Sulla Myth’, in Eckert, A. and Thein, A. (eds.), Sulla: Politics and Reception. Berlin and Boston: 159–72.Google Scholar
Edmonds, J. M. (1957). The Fragments of Attic Comedy, I, Leiden.Google Scholar
Edmondson, J. (2002). ‘Public Spectacles and Roman Social Relations’, in Basarrate, T. N. (ed.), Ludi romani: Espectaculos en hispania romana. Madrid: 2143.Google Scholar
Edmunds, J. and Turner, B. S. (eds.) (2002). Generational Consciousness, Narrative, and Politics. Lanham.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (1992). From a Sabine Jar: Reading Horace, Odes 1.9. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1996). Writing Rome: Textual Approaches to the City. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2003). ‘Incorporating the Alien: The Art of Conquest’, in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge: 158–76.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2007). Death in Ancient Rome. New Haven.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (ed. and trans.) (2008). Suetonius. Lives of the Caesars. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ehlich, K. (2007). ‘Textualität und Schriftlichkeit’, in Morenz, L. and Schorch, S. (eds.), Was ist ein Text? – Ägyptologische, altorientalistische und alttestamentliche Perspektiven. Berlin: 317.Google Scholar
Eicks, M. (2011), Liebe und Lyrik. Zur Funktion des erotischen Diskurses in Horazens erster Odensammlung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Eigler, H., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (eds.) (2003). Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius. Gattungen. Autoren. Kontexte. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Eilers, C. (2002). Roman Patrons in Greek Cities. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eisenhut, W. (1973). Virtus Romana: Ihre Stellung im römische Wertsystem. Munich.Google Scholar
Eliade, M. (2009). Rites and Symbols of Initiation. Putnam.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (2013). Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1995). Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1997). ‘Inventing Imperium: Texts and the Propaganda of Monuments in Augustan Rome’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge: 3253.Google Scholar
Erll, A. (2008). ‘Cultural Memory Studies: An Introduction’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin and Boston: 115.Google Scholar
Erll, A. (2011). Memory in Culture. Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Erll, A. (2018a). ‘Media and the Dynamics of Memory: From Cultural Paradigms to Transcultural Mediation’, in Wagoner, B. (ed.), Handbook of Culture and Memory. Oxford: 305–24.Google Scholar
Erll, A. (2018b). ‘Homer: A Relational Mnemohistory’, Memory Studies 11: 274–86.Google Scholar
Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), (2008). Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (2010). A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin.Google Scholar
Erll, A. and Rigney, A. (eds.) (2009). Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Erll, A. and Rigney, A. (2009a). ‘Introduction: Cultural Memory and its Dynamics’, in Erll, A. and Rigney, A. (eds.), Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin and Boston: 411.Google Scholar
Epstein, D. F. (1987). Personal Enmity in Roman Politics, 218–43 B.C. London and New York.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. and Kleijwegt, M. (1992). ‘Did the Romans Like Young Men? A Study of the Lex Villia Annalis: Causes and Effects’, ZPE 92: 181–95.Google Scholar
Evans, J. D. (2013). ‘Coins and the Archaeology of Roman Republic’, in D. Evans, J. (ed.), A Companion to the Archaeology of the Roman Republic. Chichester.Google Scholar
Faber, R. A. (2018). ‘Intermediality and Ekphrasis in Latin Epic Poetry’, Greece & Rome 65.1: 114.Google Scholar
Fairclough, H. R. (1926). Horace. Satires. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1997). ‘Images of the City’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: 122–35.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2003). ‘Three Wise Men and the End of the Roman Republic’, in Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar Against Liberty? Perspectives on His Autocracy. Cambridge: 96117.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004). The World of Cicero’s De Oratore. Oxford.Google Scholar
Favro, D. (1988). ‘The Roman Forum and Roman Memory’, Places 5: 1724.Google Scholar
Favro, D. (1993). ‘Reading the Augustan City’, in Holliday, P. J. (ed.), Narrative and Event in Ancient Art. New York: 230–57.Google Scholar
Favro, D. (1994). ‘The Street Triumphant: The Urban Impact of Roman Triumphal Parades’, in Favro, D., Zeynep, Ç and Ingersoll, R. (eds.), Streets: Critical Perspectives on Public Space. London: 151–64.Google Scholar
Favro, D. (1996). The Urban Image of Augustan Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2006). ‘Review of Goldberg: Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and its Reception (2005)’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2006.08.45.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1991). The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1998). Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2005). ‘The Beginnings of a Literature in Latin’, Journal of Roman Studies 95: 226–40.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2007a). Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley and London.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2007b). ‘On Not Forgetting the “Literatur” in “Literatur und Religion”: Representing the Mythic and the Divine in Roman Historiography’, in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselmann, K. (eds.), Literatur und Religion 2: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen. Berlin and New York: 173202.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2016). Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fehrle, R. (1983). Cato Uticensis. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Feltovich, A. (2015). ‘The Many Shapes of Sisterhood in Roman Comedy’, in Dutsch, D., James, S. and Konstan, D. (eds.), Women in Roman Republican Drama. Madison, Wisconsin: 128–54.Google Scholar
Fenton, A. (2008). ‘The Forest and the Trees: Pattern and Meaning in Horace, “Odes” 1’, American Journal of Philology 129. 4: 559–80.Google Scholar
Fentress, E. (2007). ‘Museum Review: Around the Temple: The New Galleries of the Capitoline Museum’, American Journal of Archaeology 111: 365–9.Google Scholar
Fentress, J. and Wickham, C. (1992). Social Memory: New Perspectives on the Past. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. (2014). ‘The Reception of Plautus in Antiquity’, in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford: 767–81.Google Scholar
Fishwick, D. (1995). ‘De la Carthage punique à la Carthage romaine. La levée de l’interdit’, in Trousset, P. (ed.), Monuments funéraires. Institutions autochtones. L’Afrique du Nord antique et médiévale. VIe Colloque international sur l’histoire et l’archéologie de l’Afrique du Nord. Pau, octobre 1993. Paris: 235–44.Google Scholar
Fleury, P., Callebat, L., Gros, P. and Soubiran, J. (1969–93). Vitruve, De l’architecture. Paris.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (1995). ‘Fabulae Praetextae in Context: When were Plays on Contemporary Subjects performed in Republican Rome?’, Classical Quarterly 45: 170–90.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (1996). Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2006). The Art of Forgetting. Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2010). Roman Republics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2015). ‘Sulla’s Memoirs as an Account of Individual Religious Experience’, Religion in the Roman Empire 1: 297320.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2017). The Dancing Lares and the Serpent in the Garden: Religion at the Roman Street Corner. Princeton.Google Scholar
Flügel, C., Dolenz, H., Schmidt, K. and Baur, C. (2018). ‘Die augusteische Gründungsphase der Colonia Carthago Magnae in Vestigiis Carthaginis’, Römische Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 124: 353423.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2010). Funny Words in Plautine Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2016). ‘Reading Dismemberment: Vitruvius, Dinocrates, and the Macrotext’, Arethusa 49: 145–59.Google Scholar
Fornis, C. (2008). ‘La construcción de la identidad romana en Corinto’, Habis 38: 205–24.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. F. and Schütrumpf, E. (eds.) (2001). Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar
Fouquet, J. and Gaitonou, L. (eds.) (2013). Im Schatten der Alten? Ideal und Lebenswirklichkeit im römischen Griechenland. 3. Heidelberger Altertumswissenschaftliches Studierendenkolloquium, 8–10. November 2013. Mainz.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. N. (1914–27). Plato with an English Translation by H.N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. N. (1999). Plato: Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2007). Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraccaro, P. (1907). Studi Varroniani. De gente populi romani libri IV. Padua.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (2007). Plautine Elements in Plautus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Francese, C. (2007). Ancient Rome in So Many Words. New York.Google Scholar
Fraschetti, A. (2005). The Foundation of Rome. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. (2012). Madness Triumphant: A Reading of Lucan’s Pharsalia. Lanham.Google Scholar
Frears, J. R. (1981). ‘The Cults of Virtutes and Roman Imperial Propaganda’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.17.2: 889939.Google Scholar
Freese, J. H. (1930). Cicero Orations. Pro Quinctio, Pro Roscio Amerino, Pro Roscio Comoedo, On the Agrarian Law. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Freyberger, K. S. and Ertel, C. (2007). ‘Neue Forschungen zur Basilica Aemilia auf dem Forum Romanum. Ein Vorbericht’, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 113: 493552.Google Scholar
Frézouls, E. (1989). ‘Grammaire et rhétorique chez Vitruve’, Ktema 14: 227–45.Google Scholar
Frisch, H., H. (1946). Cicero’s Fight for the Republic. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1987). ‘Erneuerung als Wiederherstellung des Alten. Zur Funktion antiquarischer Forschung im Spätrepublikanischen Rom’, in Herzog, R. and Koselleck, R. (eds.), Epochenschwelle und Epochenbewusstsein. Munich: 131–51.Google Scholar
Fussell, P. (1977). Cultural paradigms and traumatic testimony. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1980). ‘La praefatio di Vitruvio e la Roma augustea’, Acta Classica Debrecensis 16: 4952.Google Scholar
Gagé, J. (1936). ‘Actiaca’, Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire, 53: 37100.Google Scholar
Gagé, J. (1955). Apollon romain. Essai sur le culte d’Apollon et le développement du « ritus Graecus » à Rome des origines à Auguste. Rome.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J. (1975). ‘Que représentent les Gracques pour Cicéron?’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 34: 499529.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1996). Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (2007). ‘Continuity and Change: Religion in the Augustan Semi-Century’, in Rüpke, J. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Religion. Oxford and Malden: 7182.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (ed.) (2014a). Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (2014b). ‘Introduction’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Ann Arbor: 112.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (2016a). Memory and Forgetting in the Age of Augustus. Sydney.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (2016b). Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (2016c). ‘Introduction’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford and New York: 139.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. and Lapatin, K. D. S. (eds.) (2015). Cultural Memories in the Roman Empire. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Galli, F. (1987–88). ‘L’iscrizione trionfale di Ti. Sempronio Gracco’, Annali dell’Istituto Universitario orientale di Napoli. Sezione filologico-letteraria 9–10: 135–8.Google Scholar
Gallia, A. B. (2012). Remembering the Roman Republic: Culture, Politics, and History under the Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gallina Zevi, A. and Humphrey, J. (eds.) (2004). Ostia, Cicero, Gamala, Feasts and the Economy. Papers in Memory of J. H. D’Arms, Journal of Roman Archaeology Suppl. 57. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Garcia-Bellido, M. P. (1986). ‘Nuevos documentos sobre minería y agricultura romanas en Hispania’, Archivo Español de Arqueología 59.153: 1346.Google Scholar
Garde-Hansen, J. (2011). Media and Memory. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Gäth, S. (2011). Die Literarische Rezeption des Cato Uticensis. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Gebhard, E. R. (2005). ‘Rites for Melikertes-Palaimon in the Early Roman Corinthia’, in Schowalter, D. N. and Friesen, S. J. (eds.), Urban Religion in Roman Corinth. Interdisciplinary Approaches. Cambridge, MA: 164203.Google Scholar
Gedi, N. and Elam, Y. (1996). ‘Collective Memory – What Is It?’, History and Memory 8. 1: 3050.Google Scholar
Gee, E. (2013). ‘Cicero’s Poetry’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge: 88107.Google Scholar
Geertman, H. (1994). ‘Teoria e attualita della progettistica architettonica di Vitruvio’, in Le Projet de Vitruve: Objet, Destinaires et Réception du de Architectura. Collection de l’École française de Rome 192. Paris: 730.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretations of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1979). ‘Munatius Rufus and Thrasea Paetus on Cato the Younger’, Athenaeum 57: 4872.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1985). Cornelius Nepos and Ancient Political Biography. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (2008). The First Hall of Fame. A Study of the Statues in the Forum Augustum. Leiden.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (2011). ‘The Augustan Age’, in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity. Leiden: 233–66.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1968). Caesar: Politician and Statesman (trans. P. Needham). Oxford.Google Scholar
Gerrish, J. (2019). Sallust’s Histories and Triumviral Historiography. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Giannelli, G. (1993). ‘Arx’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topograhicum Urbis Romae. vol. 1: 127–9.Google Scholar
Giannelli, G. (1996). ‘Iuno Moneta, Aedes’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 1: 123–5.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. and Steel, C. (2010). ‘The Indistinct Literary Careers of Cicero and Pliny the Younger’, in Hardie, P. and Moore, H. (eds.), Classical Literary Careers and their Reception. Cambridge: 118–37.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2015). Among Friends: Cicero and the Epicureans. PhD Diss. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011). Creative Eloquence. The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gilloch, G. and Kilby, J. (2005). ‘Trauma and Memory in the City. From Auster to Austerlitz’, in Crinson, M. (ed.), Urban Memory. History and Amnesia in the Modern City. London and New York: 119.Google Scholar
Goar, R. J. (1983). The Legend of Cato Uticensis from the First Century B.C. to the Fifth Century A.D. Brussels.Google Scholar
Godzich, W. (1994). The Culture of Literacy. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1982/83) ‘Terence and the Death of Comedy’, Comparative Drama, 16: 312–24, rpt. in Drama and the Classical Heritage, ed. C. Davidson et al. (New York 1993): 5264.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1983). ‘Terence, Cato, and the Rhetorical Prologue’, Classical Philology, 78: 198211.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1995). Epic in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2005a). Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and its Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2005b). ‘Early Republican Epic’, in Foley, J. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epic. Oxford: 429–39.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2010). ‘Fact, Fiction, and Form in Early Roman Epic’, in Konstan, D. and Raaflaub, K. A. (eds.), Epic and History. Chichester and Malden: 167–84.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. (2013). Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. (2017). ‘Textual Monuments: Reconstructing Carthage in Augustan Literary Culture’, Classical Philology 112: 368–83.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. (1996). Der Diktator ist tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des Zweiten Triumvirats. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2002). ‘Blind Eyes and Cut Throats: Amnesia and Silence in Horace Satires 1.7’, Classical Philology 97.2: 145–61.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2000). ‘Memory and Silence in Cicero’s Brutus’, Eranos 98: 3964.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2005). Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2013). ‘Tully’s Boat: Responses to Cicero in the Imperial Period’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge: 233–50.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2016). ‘Memory as a Motive in Tacitus’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford: 4364.Google Scholar
Graindor, P. (1927). Athènes sous Auguste. Cairo.Google Scholar
Granger, F. S. (1931). Vitruvius: On Architecture I. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Granger, F. S. (1934). Vitruvius: On Architecture II. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. (1993). Plautus: Menaechmi. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2016). ‘Honor and the Honorable: Cato’s discourse in De Finibus 3’, in Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (eds.), Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: 118–46.Google Scholar
Green, W. M. (1963). Augustine. City of God, Volume II: Books 4–7. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1973). ‘The Tribune C. Cornelius’, Journal of Roman Studies 63: 196213.Google Scholar
Grillo, L. (2012). The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1973). ‘Hermodoros et Vitruve’, Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire de l’école Française de Rome, Antiquité 85: 137–61.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1975). ‘Structures et limites de la compilation vitruvienne dans les livres III et IV du De Architectura’, Latomus 34: 9861009.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1990). ‘Le premier urbanisme de la Colonia Iulia Carthago. Mythes et réalités d’une fondation césaro-augustéenne’, in L’Afrique dans l’Occident romain, Ier s. av. J.C. IV e s. ap. J.C., Actes du Colloque de Rome sur la romanisation de l’Afrique. Rome: 547–73.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1992). Vitruve, de l’architecture, livre IV. Paris.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1994). ‘Munus non ingratum: le traité vitruvien et la notion de service’, in Le Projet de Vitruve: Objet, Destinaires et Reception du de Architectura. Collection de l’École française de Rome 192. Paris: 7590.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1996). ‘Iuppiter Tonans, Aedes’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 3: 159–60.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (2000). ‘Carthage romaine. Résurrection d’une capitale’, in Nicolet, C. (ed.), Mégapoles méditerranéennes. Géographie urbaine rétrospective. Actes du colloque, Rome 8-11 mai 1996. Paris: 534–44.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (2006). Vitruve et la tradition des traités d’architecture: fabrica et ratiocinatio. Paris.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1974). The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. (1992). Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Gualandi, G. (1982). ‘Plinio e il collezionismo d’arte’, in Alfonsi, L. (ed.), Plinio il Vecchio sotto il profilo storico e letterario (Atti Convegno Como 1979). Como: 259–99.Google Scholar
Guérin, C. (2015). La Voix de la vérité. Témoin et témoignage dans les tribunaux romains du Ier siècle avant J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. (1995). Athen. Die Geschichte der Stadt in hellenistischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (1998). The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Haffter, H. (1954). ‘Die römische Humanitas’, Neue Schweizer Rundschau 21: 719–31.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1925). Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1941). La topographie légendaire des évangiles en terre sainte: étude de mémoire collective. Paris.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1950). La mémoire collective. Paris. [Published in English as Coser, L. A. (ed. and trans. ) (1992). Maurice Halbwachs. On Collective Memory. Chicago.]Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1997). La mémoire collective: Édition critique établie par Gérard Namer. Paris.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. and Closer, L. (1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago.Google Scholar
Hall, J. B. (1995). Ovid. Tristia. Stuttgart-Leipzig.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1995). Aristotle: Poetics. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Haltenhoff, A. (1998). ‘Kritik der akademischen Skepsis. Ein Kommentar zu Cicero, Lucullus 1-62’, in Studien zur klassischen Philologie 113. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Hanchey, D. (2014). ‘Days of Future Passed: Fiction Performing Fact in Cicero’s Dialogues’, Classical Journal 110: 6175.Google Scholar
Hanses, M. (2020). The Life of Comedy after the Death of Plautus and Terence. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. A. (ed. and trans.) (1989–96). Apuleius. Metamorphoses. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1989). Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1991). ‘The Janus Episode in Ovid’s Fasti’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 26: 4764.Google Scholar
Harl, K. (1996). Coinage in the Roman Economy, 300 BC to AD 700. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2014). Horace, New Surveys in the Classics 42. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2017). Horace: Odes Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hartkamp, R. F. (2004). Von ‘leno’ zu ‘ruffiano’: die Darstellung, Entwicklung und Funktion der Figur des Kupplers in der römischen Palliata und in der italienischen Renaissancekomödie. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Haselberger, L. and Thein, A. (2007). Urbem adornare: die Stadt Rom und ihre Gestaltumwandlung unter Augustus = Rome’s Urban Metamorphosis under Augustus, Journal of Roman Archaeology. Suppl. 64. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Häussler, R. (1976). Das historische Epos der Griechen und Römer bis Vergil: Studien zum historischen Epos der Antike Teil I: Von Homer zu Vergil. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Hayden, D. (1997). The Power of Place. Urban Landscapes as Public History. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Heftner, H. (2006). ‘Der Beginn von Sullas Proskriptionen’, Tyche 21: 3352.Google Scholar
Heinemann, I. (1931). ‘Humanitas’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft Suppl. 5: 282310.Google Scholar
Hekster, O. (2006). ‘Descendants of Gods: Legendary Geneaologies in the Roman Empire’, in de Blois, L., Funke, P. and Hahn, J. (eds.), The Impact of Imperial Rome on Religions, Ritual and Religious Life in the Roman Empire. Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C.-AD.476), Münster, June 30–July 4, 2004. Leiden and Boston: 2435.Google Scholar
Hemmen, W. (1954). Das Bild des M. Porcius Cato Uticensis in der antiken Literatur. PhD Diss. University of Göttingen.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1994). ‘On Getting Rid of Kings: Horace, Satire 1.7’, Classical Quarterly 44: 146–70, repr. (1998). Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History, and Civil War. Cambridge: 73–107.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2004). Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Henderson, M. I. (1951). ‘The Process “De Repetundis”’, Journal of Roman Studies 41: 7188.Google Scholar
Hermansen, G. (1982). Ostia. Aspects of Roman City Life. Edmonton.Google Scholar
Herz, P. (1994). ‘Kollegien in Ostia. Gedanken zu den Inschriften CIL XIV 250 und 251’, in Günther, R. and Rebenich, S. (eds.), E fontibus haurire. Beiträge zur römischen Geschichte und zu ihren Hilfswissenschaften. Paderborn: 295325.Google Scholar
Herzog, R. and Koselleck, R. (eds.) (1987). Epochenschwelle und Epochenbewusstsein. Munich.Google Scholar
Heurgon, J. (1964). ‘L. Cincius et la loi du clavus annalis’, Athenaeum 42: 432–7.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2007). Propertius. Elegiae. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1984). ‘Two Conjectures’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 30: 72–3.Google Scholar
Highbarger, E. (1942). ‘Vergil and Roman Art’, The Classical Weekly 36:8, 87–9.Google Scholar
Hilder, J. (2015). Recontextualising the Rhetorica ad Herennium. PhD Diss. University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (1959). ‘Spendende Götter.’ Antaios 1: 173–8.Google Scholar
Hinard, F. (1985). Les Proscriptions de la Rome républicaine (Collection de l’École française de Rome LXXXIII). Rome.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M. (1997). Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M. (2012). The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. New York.Google Scholar
Ho Tai, H.-T. (2001). ‘Remembered Realms: Pierre Nora and French National Memory’, The American Historical Review 106: 906–22.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1983). ‘Introduction: Inventing Traditions’, in Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (eds.), The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: 114.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. and Ranger, T. (eds.) (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobuß, S. (2011). ‘Aspects of Memory Acts: Transnational Cultural Memory and Ethics’, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 3: 16.Google Scholar
Hodgman, A. (1902). ‘Noun Declensions in Plautus’, Classical Review 16: 294305.Google Scholar
Hoelscher, S. and Alderman, D. H. (2004). ‘Memory and Place: Geographies of a Critical Relationship’, Social & Cultural Geographies 5: 347–55.Google Scholar
Hoff, M. C. (1989a). ‘The Early History of the Roman Agora in Athens’, in Walker, S. and Cameron, A. (eds.), The Greek Renaissance in the Roman Empire. Papers from the Tenth British Museum Classical Colloquium. London: 18.Google Scholar
Hoff, M. C. (1989b). ‘Civil Disobedience and Unrest in Augustan Athens’, Hesperia 58: 267–76.Google Scholar
Hoff, M. C. (1997). ‘Laceratae Athenaea: Sulla’s Siege of Athens in 87/86 BC and its Aftermath’, in Hoff, M. C. and Rotroff, S. I. (eds.), The Romanization of Athens. Proceedings of an International Conference held at Lincoln, Nebraska (April 1996). Oxford: 3351.Google Scholar
Hoff, M. C. (2001). ‘An Equestrian Statue of Lucius Caesar in Athens Reconsidered’, Archäologischer Anzeiger 4: 583–99.Google Scholar
Hoff, M. C. (2005). ‘Athens Honors Pompey the Great’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T. and Schenkeveld, D. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002. Vol. II: The Statesman in Plutarch’s Greek and Roman Lives. Leiden: 327–66.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E. 2004. After Such Knowledge: Memory, History and the Legacy of the Holocaust. New York.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2001). ‘Capitol, Comitium, und Forum. Öffentliche Räume, sakrale Topographie und Erinnerungslandschaften der römischen Republik’, in Faller, S. (ed.), Studien zu antiken Identitäten. Würzburg: 97128.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2004). Senatus Populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimension und Deutungen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2006). ‘History and Collective Memory in the Middle Republic’, in Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Oxford: 478–95.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2008). ‘Hierarchie und Konsens. Pompae in der politischen Kultur der römischen Republik’, in Arweiler, A. and Gauly, B. (eds.), Machtfragen: Zur kulturellen Repräsentation und Konstruktion von Macht in Antike, Mittelalter und Neuzeit. Stuttgart: 79126.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2012). ‘Im Gewebe der Geschichte(n). Memoria, Monumente und ihre mythhistorische Vernetzung’, Klio 94: 380414.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2013). ‘Review of Gallia 2012’, Gnomon 85: 137–45.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2014). ‘In Defense of Concepts, Categories, and other Abstractions. Remarks on a Theory of Memory (in the Making)’, Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana. Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome Suppl. 10, Ann Arbor: 6370.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2016a). ‘In the Web of (Hi-)Stories: Memoria, Monuments and Their Myth-Historical “Interconnectedness”’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford: 169213.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2016b). ‘Prestige en construction dans la République romaine: la classe dirigeante et ses stratégies de représentation publique’, in Baudry, R. and Hurlet, F. (eds.), Le prestige à Rome à la fin de la République et au début du Principat. Paris: 2137.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2018). ‘Memoria by Multiplication: The Cornelii Scipiones in Monumental Memory’, in Smith, C. J. and Sandberg, K. (eds.), Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome. Leiden: 422–76.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. (2017). ‘Erinnerungsorte der griechischen und römischen Welt – Zur Anwendung eines modernen Konzepts auf die antike Welt’, in von Hesberg, H., Kunow, J. and Otten, T. (eds.), Stadt – Erinnerung – Wertstiftung. Aspekte der Validierung im europäischen Vergleich. Worms: 83-91.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Heitmann-Gordon, H. (trans.) (2010). Reconstructing the Roman Republic. An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar
Holleran, C. (2003). ‘The Development of Public Entertainment Venues in Rome and Italy’, in Lomas, K. and Cornell, T. (eds.), ‘Bread and Circuses’. Eugertism and Municipal Patronage. London: 4661.Google Scholar
Holliday, P. J. (2002). The Origins of Roman Historical Commemoration in the Visual Arts. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hollstein, W. (1994). ‘Apollo und Libertas in der Münzprägung des Brutus und Cassius’, Jahrbuch für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte 44: 113–33.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (1984). ‘Actium und Salamis’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 99: 187214.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (1985). ‘Denkmäler der Schlacht von Actium. Propaganda und Resonanz’, Klio 67: 81102.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2001). ‘Die Alten vor Augen. Politische Denkmäler und öffentliches Gedächtnis im republikanischen Rom’, in Melville, G. (ed.), Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Cologne: 183211.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2004). The Language of Images in Roman Art. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2006). ‘Greek Styles and Greek Art in Augustan Rome: Issues of the Present versus Records of the Past’, in Porter, J. I. (ed.), Classical Pasts. The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton and Oxford: 237–59.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (1989). ‘Literarische Tradition und politische Aussage in den Feldherrn-Viten des Cornelius Nepos’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 15: 159–73.Google Scholar
Hooper, W. D. and Ash, H. B. (ed. and trans.) (1934). Cato, Varro. On Agriculture. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1988). ‘Patronage of Art in the Roman World’, Prudentia 20: 928.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1995). A Companion to the Study of Virgil, Mnemosyne Suppl. 151, Leiden.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1996). ‘The Cultural Horizons of the Plebs Romana’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 41: 101–19.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2003). The Culture of the Roman Plebs. London.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2006). Virgil, Aeneid 3: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hout, M. P. J. van den. (1988). M. Cornelii Frontonis epistulae schedis tam editis quam ineditis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Howgego, C., Heuchert, V. and Burnett, A. (eds.) (2005). Coinage and Identity in the Roman Provinces. Oxford.Google Scholar
Howley, J. (2018). Aulus Gellius and Roman Reading Culture: Text, Presence, and Imperial Knowledge in the Noctes Atticae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. (1984), ‘Art and Vision in Propertius 2.31/32’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 114: 281–97.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. M. (1949). Cicero: on Invention; The Best Kind of Orator; Topics. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hulton, A.O. (1972). ‘Exegi monumentum”: Horace on his Poetry’, Latomus 31: 497502.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2017). ‘Les normes sociales dans la République romaine d’après le regimen morum des censeurs’, in Le Doze, P. and Itgenshorst, T. (eds.), La norme sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains: élaboration, diffusion et contournements. Bordeaux: 301–17.Google Scholar
Hurbánková, S. (2010). ‘Characters and Comic Situations in Roman Comedy: The Atellan Farce and Mime’, Graeco-Latina Brunensia 15: 6980.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. (1993). La dictature de Sylla. Monarchie ou magistrature républicaine? Essai d’Histoire constitutionelle. Brussels and Rome.Google Scholar
Hurlet, F. and Mineo, B. (2009). ‘Introduction: Res publica restituta. Le pouvoir et ses representations à Rome sous le Principat d’Auguste’, in Hurlet, F. and Mineo, B. (eds.), Le Principat d’Auguste. Réalités et representations du pouvoir autour de la res publica restituta. Rennes: 722.Google Scholar
Hurst, H. (2011). ‘Understanding Carthage as a Roman Port’, Bollettino di archeologia online, volume speziale 7: 4968.Google Scholar
Huskey, S. J. (2006), ‘(Mis)Guided Tour of Rome: Some Purposeful Omissions in Tr. 3.1’, The Classical Journal 102. 1: 1739.Google Scholar
Huskinson, J. (2000). ‘Elite Culture and the Identity of Empire’, in Huskinson, J. (ed.), Experiencing Rome. Culture, Identity and Power in the Roman Empire. New York: 95124.Google Scholar
Ifuku, G. (2014). ‘An “Ideal” Roman City of Carthage and the Temple of Caelestis, with Special Reference to Carthage and Thugga’, in Nakai, Y. and Carafa, P. (eds.), Memory of the Past and Its Utility: State Society Identity. Rome: 117–29.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. (1997). Livy’s Written Rome. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. (2006). ‘Livy, Hannibal’s Monument, and the Temple of Juno at Croton’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 136: 389414.Google Scholar
Jahn, J. (1970). Interregnum und Wahldiktatur. Kallmünz.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (1987). Der Staat des Dictators Caesar. Cologne and Vienna.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2014). ‘Das Volk als Institution und diskursive Bezugsgröße in der römischen Republik’, in Lundgreen, C. (ed.), Staatlichkeit in Rom? Diskurse und Praxis (in) der römischen Republik. Stuttgart: 117–37.Google Scholar
Jewell, E. (2018). ‘Like Father, Like Son? The Dynamics of Family Exemplarity and Ideology in (Fragmentary) Republican Oratory’, in Steel, C., Gray, C. and van der Blom, H. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge: 267–82.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1964). ‘Ancient Scholarship and Virgil’s Use of Republican Latin Poetry I’, Classical Quarterly 14: 280–95.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1985). ‘The Annotations of M. Valerius Probus (II)’, Classical Quarterly 35: 149–61.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1993). ‘Rev. of O. Zwierlein, Zur Kritik und Exegese des Plautus. I: Poenulus und Curculio’, Gnomon 65: 122–37.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1973), ‘The Emotions of Patriotism. Propertius 4.6’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity 6: 151–80.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. (2017). The Sons of Remus: Identity in Roman Gaul and Spain. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (1970). ‘Cicero’s Cato’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 113: 188–96.Google Scholar
Jones, R. E. (1939). ‘Cicero’s Accuracy of Characterisation in his Dialogues’, American Journal of Philology 60: 307–25.Google Scholar
Jones, W. H. S. (1961). Pausanias: Description of Greece. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Judge, E. (1974). ‘Res Publica Restituta: A Modern Illusion?’, in Evans, J. A. S. (ed.), Polis and Imperium. Studies in Honour of Edward Togo Salmon. Toronto: 279311.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1954). The Collected Works of C. G. Jung 9.1: Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kajanto, I. (1981). ‘Fortuna.’ Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.17.1: 502–58.Google Scholar
Karakasis, E. (2005). Terence and the Language of Roman comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1978). ‘Servius and Idonei Auctores’, American Journal of Philology 99: 181209.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1988). Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1995). C. Suetonius Tranquillus: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Keeline, T. J. (2018). The Reception of Cicero in the Early Roman Empire: The Rhetorical Schoolroom and the Creation of a Cultural Legend. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keesling, C. M. (2007). ‘Early Hellenistic Portrait Statues on the Athenian Acropolis. Survival, Reuse, Transformation’, in Hoff, M. C. and Rotroff, S. I. (eds.), The Romanization of Athens. Proceedings of an International Conference held at Lincoln, Nebraska (April 1996). Oxford: 141–60.Google Scholar
Keesling, C. M. (2010). ‘The Hellenistic and Roman afterlives of Dedications on the Athenian Akropolis’, in Krumeich, R. and Witschel, C. (eds.), Die Akropolis von Athen im Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Wiesbaden: 303–27.Google Scholar
Keesling, C. M. (2019). Early Greek Portraiture: Monuments and Histories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keil, H. (ed.) (1857–80). Grammatici Latini. 7 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kellum, B. (1997). Concealing/Revealing: Gender and the Play of Meaning in the Monuments of Augustan Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. (2008). ‘Publishing the Philippics, 43-42 BC’, in T. Stevenson and M. Wilson, (eds), Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology. = Prudentia 37-38: 2238.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. P. (2006). A History of Exile in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kent, R. G. (ed. and trans.) (1938). Marcus Terentius Varro. De Lingua Latina. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Kenter, L. P. (1972). De Legibus: A Commentary on Book I. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Keyes, C. W. (1929) (trans. and ed). Cicero, De re publica. LondonGoogle Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (1978). ‘Cicero’s “Cato”: Überlegungen zu einer verlorenen Schrift Ciceros’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 121: 167–84.Google Scholar
Kinsey, T. (1985). ‘The case against Sextus Roscius of Ameria’, L’Antiquité classique 54: 188–96.Google Scholar
Kinsey, T. (1988). ‘The Sale of the Property of Roscius of Ameria: How Illegal Was It?’, L’Antiquité classique 57: 296–7.Google Scholar
Klein, K. (2000). ‘On the Emergence of Memory in Historical Discourse’, Representations 69: 127–50.Google Scholar
Kleinwächter, C. (2001). Platzanlagen nordafrikanischer Städte. Untersuchungen zum sogenannten Polyzentrismus in der Urbanistik der römischen Kaiserzeit. Mayence.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. (1964). Livius und seine Vorgänger. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Klowski, J. (2015). ‘Forschungsbericht zu Cornelius Nepos’, in Dunsch, B. and Prokoph, F. M. (eds.), Geschichte und Gegenwart. Beiträge zu Cornelius Nepos aus Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik und Unterrichtspraxis. Wiesbaden: 267330.Google Scholar
Knox, P. (2011). ‘Cicero as a Hellenistic Poet’, Classical Quarterly 61: 192204.Google Scholar
König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.) (2007). Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. (2013). The Divinization of Caesar and Augustus: Precedents, Consequences, Implications. New York.Google Scholar
Kouser, R. (2015). ‘Monument and Memory in Ancient Greece and Rome: A Comparative Perspective’, in Galinsky, K. and Lapatin, K. (eds.), Cultural Memories in the Roman Empire. Los Angeles: 3348.Google Scholar
Krasser, H. (2008). ‘Ianus victor. Ein Leitmotiv im ersten Buch der Fasti’, in Krasser, H., Pausch, D. and Petrovic, I. (eds.), Triplici invectus triumpho. Der römische Triumph in augusteischer Zeit. Stuttgart: 265–84.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (ed.) (1994). Livy: Ab Urbe Condita Book VI. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2009). ‘A Seemingly Artless Conversation: Cicero’s De Legibus (1.1–5)’, Classical Philology 104.1: 90106.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, L. (2017). ‘Varro the Roman Cynic: the Destruction of Religious Authority in the Antiquitates rerum divinarum’, in J. König and G. Woolf (eds.), Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture. Cambridge and New York: 306–28.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2001). Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago.Google Scholar
Krumeich, R. (2008). ‘Formen der statuarischen Repräsentation römischer Honoranden auf der Akropolis von Athen im späten Hellenismus und in der Frühen Kaiserzeit’, in Blizos, S. (ed.), Athens During the Roman Period: Recent Discoveries, New Evidence. Athens: 353–70.Google Scholar
Krumeich, R. (2010). ‘Vor klassischem Hintergrund. Zum Phänomen der Wiederverwendung älterer Statuen auf der Athener Akropolis als Ehrenstatuen für Römer’, in Krumeich, R. and Witschel, C. (eds.), Die Akropolis von Athen im Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Wiesbaden: 329–98.Google Scholar
Krumeich, R. (2011). ‘Vom Krieger zum Konsul. Zwei frühklassische Weihgeschenke auf der Akropolis von Athen und ihre Weiterverwendung in der frühen Kaiserzeit’, in Pilz, O. and Vonderstein, M. (eds.), Keraunia. Beiträge zu Mythos, Kult und Heiligtum in der Antike. Berlin: 87104.Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, P. (2002). Carmina Saturnia Epigraphica. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kubiak, D. P. (1990). ‘Cicero and the Poetry of Nature’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 8: 198214.Google Scholar
Kuin, I. N. I. (2017). ‘Anchoring Political Change in Post-Sullan Athens’, in Dijkstra, T. D., Kuin, I. N. I., Moser, M. and Weidgenannt, D. (eds.), Strategies of Remembering in Greece under Rome (100 BC–100 AD). Publications of the Netherlands Institute at Athens VI. Leiden: 157–67.Google Scholar
Kumaniecki, K. (1970). ‘Cicero’s “Cato”’, in Wimmel, W. (ed.), Forschungen zur römischen Literatur. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Karl Büchner. Wiesbaden: 168–88.Google Scholar
Kumaniecki, K. (1970a), ‘Les discours égarés de Cicéron pro Cornelio’, Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van Belgie, Klasse der Letteren 32: 334.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. and Wittmann, R. (1995). Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der römischen Republik. 2. Abschnitt: Die Magistratur, Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, Abteilung 10, Teil 3, Band 2. Munich.Google Scholar
La Bua, G. (2019). Cicero and Roman Education. The Reception of the Speeches and Ancient Scholarship. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lachmann, R. (2008). ‘Mnemonic and Intertextual Aspects of Literature’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin and New York: 301–10.Google Scholar
Ladjimi Sebaï, L. (2005). ‘La colline de Byrsa à l’époque romaine. Etudes épigraphique et état de la question’, Karthago 26: 9-33.Google Scholar
Laignoux, R. (2012). ‘Le monnayage de Brutus et Cassius après la mort de César’, in Holmes, N. (ed.), Proceedings of the XIVth International Numismatic Congress (Glasgow 2009). Glasgow and London: 785–93.Google Scholar
Landolfi, L. (1987). ‘Preannunzi di epische Technik nelle Georgiche’, Pan 8: 5573.Google Scholar
Landsberg, A. (1995). ‘Prosthetic Memory: Total Recall and Blade Runner’, in Featherstone, M. and Burrows, R. (eds.), Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment. London: 175–90.Google Scholar
Landsberg, A. (2004). Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2016). Triumphs in the Age of Civil War. The Late Republic and the Adaptability of Triumphal Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2008). ‘“Reading for the Moral” in Valerius Maximus: The Case of Severitas’, Cambridge Classical Journal 54: 160–87.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2018). Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Langslow, D. (2013). ‘Archaic Latin Inscriptions and Greek and Roman Authors’, in Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.), Inscriptions and Their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford: 167–95.Google Scholar
Lape, S. (2004). Reproducing Athens: Menander’s Comedy, Democratic Culture, and the Hellenistic City. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. and Spencer, D. (2007). The Sites of Rome: Time, Space, Memory. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lazzerini, F. (2017). ‘Romulus’ Adytum or Asylum? A New Exegetical Proposal for De Lingua Latina 5, 8’, Ciceroniana Online 1: 97128.Google Scholar
Le Glay, M. (1985). ‘Les premiers temps de Carthage romaine: pour une revision des dates’, Bulletin Archéologique du Comité des Travaux Historiques 19: 235–47.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1988). The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republic and Augustan Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lehmann, K. (1945). ‘A Roman Poet Visits a Museum’, Hesperia 14: 259–69.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Y. (1997). Varron théologien et philosophe romain. Brussels.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (1993). ‘Hopelessly Devoted to You; Traces of the Decii in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 21: 89110.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (1997). Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2010). ‘Early Roman Epic and the Maritime Moment’, Classical Philology 105. 3: 265–80.Google Scholar
Lentano, M. (2008). ‘Bruto o il potere delle imagini’, Latomus 67: 881–99.Google Scholar
Lentano, M. (2009). ‘Il debito di Bruto. Per un’antropologia del nome proprio nella cultura romana’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 23: 5989.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1895). Plautinische Forschungen zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2014). ‘Vetustas, oblivio e crisi di identità nelle Saturae Menippeae: il risveglio di Varrone in un’altra Roma’, Epekeina 4: 1958.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2017). ‘Ἄλλος Οὗτος ῾Ηρακλῆς: tracce della riflessione sui tria genera theologiae nelle Menippeae di Varrone’, Mètis N. S. 15, 355–76.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2018). ‘L’humanitas, secondo Varrone. La memoria della stirpe umana’, Athenaeum 106: 487503.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2019). Varrone, unus scilicet antiquorum hominum: senso del passato e pratica antiquaria. Bari.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2020). ‘Varro’s Demonstration of Human Eternity in Light of Lucretius: Philosophy and Politics at the End of the Republic’, Politica Antica 10: 4563.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2022). ‘L’immanitas alla fine della repubblica: una minaccia all’ordine politico, morale e culturale di Roma’, Maia, 74/2: 299–320.Google Scholar
Levick, B. (1999). ‘Messages on the Roman Coinage: Types and Inscriptions’, in Paul, G. and Ierardi (eds.), M., Roman Coins and Public Life under the Empire. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Lewicka, M. (2008). ‘Place Attachment, Place Identity, and Place Memory: Restoring the Forgotten City Past’, Journal of Environmental Psychology 28: 209–31.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. T. and Short, C. (repr. 1975). A Latin Dictionary Founded on Andrews’ Edition of Freund’s Latin Dictionary. rev. enl. and in Great Part Rewritten by Charlton T. Lewis and Charles Short. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. G. (1988). ‘Inscriptions of Amiternum and Catilina’s Last Stand’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 74: 3142.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. G. (2006). Asconius. Commentaries on Speeches of Cicero, revised by Harries, J., Smith, C. and Steel, C.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.) (2013). Inscriptions and Their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. (1973). ‘Die theologia tripertita in Forschung und Bezeugung’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt I.4: 63115.Google Scholar
Lind, L. R. (1994). ‘Thought, Life, and Literature at Rome: The Consolidation of Culture’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 7. Brussels: 571.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (1903). Nonii Marcelii De compendiosa doctrina libros XX. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.) (2000). Mos Maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (1999). The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (2008). Cicero as Evidence: A Historian’s Companion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Littlewood, J. R. (2006). A Commentary on Ovid, Fasti, Book VI. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, E. (2002). ‘Ancora sugli “Ostia’s Services to Rome”: Collegi e corporazioni annonarie a Ostia’, Mélanges d’Archeologié et d’Histoire de l’école Française de Rome, Antiquité 114: 87110.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, E. (2004). ‘Considerazioni sulla datazione di CIL XIV 375 e sulla cronologia di Gamala senior’, in Gallina Zevi, A. and Humphrey, J. (eds.), Ostia, Cicero, Gamala, Feasts, and the Economy. Papers in Memory of J. H. D’Arms. Portsmouth: 83–8.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, E. (1911). Philologischer Kommentar zur Pereginatio Aetheriae. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der lateinischen Sprache. Uppsala.Google Scholar
López Sánchez, F., ed. (2012). The City and the Coin in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lott, J. B. (2004). The Neighborhoods of Augustan Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Loupiac, A. (1999). Virgile, Auguste et Apollon. Mythes et politique à Rome. Paris.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (1995). ‘A Parade of Lyric Predecessors: Horace C. 1.12-1.18’, Phoenix 49: 3348.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2007). ‘Making an Exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus’, in Heyworth, S. J. (ed.), Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford: 91112.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1990). ‘Livy, Augustus, and the Forum Augustum’, in Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley: 123–38.Google Scholar
Lugli, G. (1946). Roma antica. Rome.Google Scholar
Luke, T. (2012). ‘Julius Caesar as Rex? The ovation of January 44 BC’, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar XV, Florida. Cambridge: 267–83.Google Scholar
Lundgreen, C. (2017). ‘Norme, loi, règle, coutume, tradition: terminologie antique et perspectives modernes’, in Le Doze, P. and Itgenshorst, T. (eds.), La norme sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains: élaboration, diffusion et contournements. Bordeaux: 1733.Google Scholar
Lundström, S. (1976). ‘Der Eingang des Proömiums zum dritten Buche der Georgica’, Hermes 104: 163–91.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998). ‘Propertius and Tibullus: Early Exchanges’, The Classical Quarterly, 48. 2: 519–44.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D.M. (1990). ‘The Meaning of ἀλαζών’, in Craik, E. M. (ed.), Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Subjects presented to Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. (1966). Enemies of the Roman Order: Treason, Unrest and Alienation in The Roman Empire. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. (1991). ‘Hellenizing the Romans (2nd century BC)’, Historia 40: 119–38.Google Scholar
Magdelain, A. (1973), ‘Remarques sur la perduellio’, Historia 22: 405–22.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. (2009). Ancient Rome and Modern America. Malden and Oxford.Google Scholar
Malcolm, D. A. (1979). ‘Quo Usque Tandem…?Classical Quarterly 29: 219–20.Google Scholar
Malcovati, E. (1976). Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta liberae rei publicae. 4th ed. Turin.Google Scholar
Malitz, J. (2003). ‘Autobiographie und Biographie römischer Kaiser im 1. Jhrdt. n. Chr.’, in Weber, G. and Zimmermann, M. (eds.), Propaganda-Selbstdarstellung-Repräsentation im römischen Kaiserreich des 1. Jhs. n. Chr. Stuttgart: 227–42.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1952). ‘The Problem of Generations’, in Kecskemeti, P. (ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge: Collected Works, Vol. 5. New York: 276322.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2006), ‘The First Book’, in Günther, H.-C., Brill’s Companion to Propertius. Leiden and Boston: 219–43.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2011). Roman Republican Theatre. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2014). ‘“Fact” and “Fiction” in Roman Historical Epic’, Greece & Rome 61. 2: 204–21.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2018). Cicero, Agrarian Speeches: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2019), Fragmentary Republican Latin, Vol. 3–5: Oratory. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Marciniak, K. (2015). ‘Cicero’s Lame Pegasus. Humanists and Classicists on the Poetic Experiments of the Master of Rhetoric’, Thersites 2: 81111.Google Scholar
Marco Simón, F. (2002). ‘Mito y bipartición simbólica del espacio en el Ara Pacis y el Forum Augustum’, in Marco, F., Pina, F. and Remesal, J. (eds.), Religión y propaganda política en el Mundo Romano. Barcelona: 105–18.Google Scholar
Marin, P. (2005). Cato the Younger: Myth and Reality. PhD Diss. University of Dublin.Google Scholar
Marini Recchia, F. and Zevi, F. (2008). ‘La storia più antica di Roma sul fregio della basilica di Ostia’, Rendiconti della Pontificia Accademia di Archeologia 80: 149–92.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2006). The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martelli, F. (2016). ‘Mourning Tullia: The Shrine of Letters in ad Atticum 12’, Arethusa 49. 3: 415–37.Google Scholar
Martelli, F. (2017). ‘The Triumph of Letters: Rewriting Cicero in ad Fam. 15’, Journal of Roman Studies 107: 90115.Google Scholar
Martin, P. M. (1988). ‘Reconstruire Carthage? Un débat politique et idéologique à la fin de la république et au début du principat’, in Mastino, A. (ed.), L’Africa romana. Atti del V convegno di studio Sassari, 11-13 dicembre 1987. Sassari: 235–51.Google Scholar
Martin, P. M. (2000). ‘Sur quelques thèmes de l’éloquence popularis, notamment l’invective contre la passivité du peuple’, in Achard, G. and Ledentu, M. (eds.), Orateur, auditeurs, lecteurs: A propos de l’éloquence romaine à la fin de la République et au début du Principat. Paris: 2741.Google Scholar
Marx, F. (1894). Incerti Auctoris de Ratione Dicendi ad C. Herennium Libri IV. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Masterson, M. (2004). ‘Status, Pay, and Pleasure in the “De Architectura” of Vitruvius’, American Journal of Philology 125: 387416.Google Scholar
Mastrorosa, I. G. (2016). ‘Lucullus en “clair-obscur”: mérites et extravagances d’un citoyen de la Rome républicaine durant l’époque impériale’, in Benoist, S., Daguet-Gagey, A. and Hoët-van Cauwenberghe, C. (eds.), Une mémoire en actes. Espaces, figures et discours dans le monde romain. Villeneuve d’Ascq: 243–63.Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. (1927). ‘A Find from the Peiraeus’, The Numismatic Chronicle 7: 287–8.Google Scholar
May, J. M. (ed.) (2002). Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (2012). Horace Odes Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. (2004). Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton.Google Scholar
McCone, K. (1987). ‘Hund, Wolf und Krieger bei den Indogermanen’, in Meid, W. (ed.), Studien zum Indogermanischen Wortschatz. Innsbruck: 101–54.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. (2006). Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McEwen, I. K. (2003). Vitruvius: Writing the Body of Architecture. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Meadows, A. and Williams, J. (2001). ‘Moneta and the Monuments: Coinage and Politics in Republican Rome’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 2749.Google Scholar
Means, T. and Dickinson, S. K. (1974). ‘Plutarch and the Family of Cato Minor’, Classical Journal 69: 210–15.Google Scholar
Meban, D. (2009). ‘Virgil’s “Eclogues” and Social Memory’, American Journal of Philology 130. 1: 99130.Google Scholar
Meckien, R. (2013). ‘Cultural Memory: the Link Between Past, Present, and Future’, Institute of Advanced Studies of the University of Sao Paulo, 7 June 2013. www.iea.usp.br/en/news/cultural-memory-the-link-between-past-present-and-future (accessed 27 March 2022).Google Scholar
Meiggs, R. (1973). Roman Ostia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Meier, C. (1965), ‘Populares’, Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Supplementband X: 549615.Google Scholar
Melville, G. (ed.) (2001). Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Cologne, Weimar, and Vienna.Google Scholar
Mercado, A. (2012). Italic Verse: A Study of the Poetic Remains of Old Latin, Faliscan, and Sabellic. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Méthy, N. (2003). ‘Ad Exemplar Antiquitatis: Les Grandes Figures du Passé dans la Correspondance de Pline le Jeune’, Revue des Études Latines 81: 200–14.Google Scholar
Mette-Dittmann, A. (1991). Die Ehegesetze des Augustus: Eine Untersuchung im Rahmen der Gesellschaftspolitik des Princeps. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M. and Wunder, E. (eds.) (2011). Cultural Memories. The Geographical Point of View. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, and New York.Google Scholar
Middleton, D. and Brown, S. D. (2011). ‘Memory and Space in the Work of Maurice Halbwachs’, in Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M. and Wunder, E. (eds.), Cultural Memories. The Geographical Point of View. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, and New York: 2949.Google Scholar
Miles, G. (1995). Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Miles, M. M. (2008). Art as Plunder. The Ancient Origins of Debate about Cultural Property. New York.Google Scholar
Miles, R. (2003). ‘Rivalling Rome: Carthage’, in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge: 123–46.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1986). ‘Politics, Persuasion and the People before the Social War (150–90 BC)’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 111.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1998). The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (2004). Rome, The Greek World, and the East Vol. 2: Government, Society, and Culture in the Roman Empire. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (2002), ‘Ovid on the Augustan Palatine (Tristia 3.1)’, in Miller, J. F., Damon, C., Myers (eds.), K. S., Vertis in usum, Studies in honor of Edward Courtney. Munich and Leipzig: 129–39.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (2009). Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1991). ‘Horace, Mercury, and Augustus, or the Poetic Ego of Odes 1-3’, American Journal of Philology 112 .3: 365–88.Google Scholar
Millis, B. W. (2010). ‘The Social and Ethnic Origins of the Colonists in Early Roman Corinth’, in Friesen, S. J., Schowalter, D. N. and Walters, J. C. (eds.), Corinth in Context. Comparative Studies on Religion and Society. Leiden and Boston: 1335.Google Scholar
Millis, B. W. (2014). ‘The Local Magistrates and Elite of Roman Corinth’, in Friesen, S. J., James, S. A. and Schowalter, D. N. (eds.), Corinth in Contrast. Studies in Inequality. Leiden: 3853.Google Scholar
Mirani, A. (1989). Lucidus Ordo. L’archittetura della lirica oraziana (Libri I–III). Bologne.Google Scholar
Mirsch, P. (1882). ‘De M. Terenti Varronis Antiquitatum rerum humanarum libris XXV’, Leipziger Studien zur Classischen Philologie 5: 1144.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (1988). ‘Tradition et raison chez Cicéron. L’émergence de la rationalité politique à la fin de la République romaine’, Les mélanges de l’École française de Rome 100: 385430.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (1997). La Raison de Rome. Naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République (IIe-Ier s. avant J.-C.). Paris.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2003a). ‘La construction du patrimoine culturel à Rome aux Ier siècle avant et Ier siècle après J.-C’, in Citroni, M. (ed.), Memoria e identità. Florence: 8198.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2003b). ‘Experts, mémoire et pouvoir à Rome, à la fin de la République’, Revue Historique 127: 303–25.Google Scholar
Modrow, S. (2017). Vom punischen zum römischen Karthago: Konfliktreflexionen und die Konstruktion römischer Identität. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Mokni, S. (2008). ‘Les premiers temps de la Carthage romaine et la titulature de la colonie’, Cahiers Glotz 19: 5376.Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. (1979). ‘A Commentary on Plutarch’s Brutus’, edited by Pelling, C. B. R.. 2017. Histos Suppl. 7. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. (1987). ‘Politics, Philosophy, and Friendship in Horace “Odes” 2,7’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, N.S. 25.1: 5972.Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. (1997). ‘Plutarch, Brutus and Brutus’ Greek and Latin letters’, in Mossman, J. (ed.), Plutarch and his Intellectual World. London: 141–68.Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. (1998). ‘Cry Freedom: Tacitus Annals 4.32–35’, Histos 2: 95184.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. (1952) [1874]. Römisches Staatsrecht. Vol. II.1. Basel.Google Scholar
Moore, C. H. (1931). Tacitus. Annales (‘Annals’). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Moore, E. (2017). ‘Channeling Identity: The Fountain of Glauke in Corinth and Jacob’s Well in John 4’, in Blakely, S. (ed.), Gods, Objects, and Ritual Practice. Studies in Ancient Mediterranean Religions 1. Atlanta: 261–80.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (1998). The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (2012). Music in Roman Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moreau, P. (1987). ‘La Lex Clodia sur le bannissement de Cicéron’, Athenaeum 65: 465–92.Google Scholar
Moreau, P. (2007). ‘Cicéron, Epistulae ad familiares I, 9, 15: un ‘mémorial’ de la conjuration de Catilina?Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes 81: 343–50.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (2010). Musa Pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse. Oxford.Google Scholar
Morillo, Á. and Aurrecoechea, J. (2006). The Roman Army in Hispania: An Archaeological Guide. Leon.Google Scholar
Morley, N. (2003). ‘Migration and the Metropolis’, in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge: 147–58.Google Scholar
Morrell, K. (2017). Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (1998). ‘Publicity, Popularity and Patronage in the Commentariolum Petitionis’, Classical Antiquity 17: 259–88.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004). Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2013). ‘“Cultural Hegemony” and the Communicative Power of the Roman Elite’, in van der Blom, H. and Steel, C. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: 2948.Google Scholar
Moser, M. (2017). ‘Reused Statues for Roman Friends: The Past as a Political Resource on the Athenian Acropolis’, in Dijkstra, T. D., Kuin, I. N. I., Moser, M. and Weidgenannt, D. (eds.), Strategies of Remembering in Greece under Rome (100 BC – 100 AD). Publications of the Netherlands Institute at Athens VI. Leiden: 169–81.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1992). ‘Disiecti membra poetae: The Rhetoric of Dismemberment in Neronian Poetry’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity. New York: 391419.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2001). Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2005). ‘Freedmen and Decurions: Epitaphs and Social History in Imperial Italy’, Journal of Roman Studies 95: 3863.Google Scholar
Muir, S. (2011). ‘Religion on the Road in Ancient Greece and Rome’, in Harland, P. A. (ed.), Travel and Religion in Antiquity. Waterloo: 2948.Google Scholar
Münzer, F. (1897). Beiträge zur Quellenkritik der Naturgeschichte des Plinius. Berlin.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. (2005). Mythical and Legendary Narrative in Ovid’s Fasti. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Murray, R. J. (1966). ‘Cicero and the Gracchi’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 97: 291–8.Google Scholar
Murray, W. M. (2012). The Age of Titans: The Rise and Fall of the Great Hellenistic Navies. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Muth, S. (2012). ‘Reglementierte Erinnerung: Das Forum Romanum unter Augustus als Raum kontrollierter Kommunikation’, in Mundt, F. (ed.), Kommunikationsräume im kaiserzeitlichen Rom. Kolloquium Rom 24.-28. Februar 2010. Berlin and Boston: 348.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F.-H. (2011). ‘Die res publica restituta des Augustus im Spiegel augusteischer Dichtung. Das kleine Problem mit der Freiheit’, in Haltenhoff, A., Heil, A. and Mutschler, F.-H. (eds.), Römische Werte und römische Literatur im frühen Prinzipat. Berlin and New York: 2353.Google Scholar
Mylonopoulos, J. (2003). Πελοπόννησος οἱκητήριον Ποσειδῶνος. Heiligtümer und Kulte des Poseidon auf der Peloponnes, Kernos Suppl. 13. Liège.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. (1994). Virgil: Georgics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nelis-Clément, J. and Nelis, D. (2013). ‘Furor Epigraphicus: Augustus, the Poets, and the Inscriptions’, in Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.), Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford: 317–47.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. E. (1995). Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. E. (1997), ‘The Role of the Book in Tristia 3.1’, Ramus. Critical Studies in Greek and Latin Literature 26. 1: 5779.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. F. (2009). ‘Social Status and the Authorial Personae of Horace and Vitruvius’, in Houghton, L. B. T. and Wyke, M. (eds.), Perceptions of Horace. A Roman Poet and His Readers. Cambridge. 109–22.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1988). L’inventaire du monde. Géographie et politique aux origins de l’empire romain. Paris.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1978). A Commentary on Horace Odes, Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nora, P. (ed.) (1984–92). Lieux de mémoire. 3 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Nora, P. (ed.) (1986). Le lieux de mémoire II: La Nation. Paris.Google Scholar
Nora, P. (1989). ‘Entre mémoire et histoire: Les lieux de mémoire’, Representations 26: 724.Google Scholar
Nora, P. (ed.) (1996). Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past I. Conflicts and Divisions. New York (revised and abridged translation of Les lieux de mémoire, Paris 1992).Google Scholar
Nora, P. (ed.) (2009). Le lieux de mémoire III: Les France. Paris.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. (2011a). ‘Coins and Communication’, in Peachin, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Ancient World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. (2011b). Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar
North, J. A. (1975). ‘Praesens Divus’, Journal of Roman Studies 65: 171–7.Google Scholar
Novara, A. (1994). ‘Faire oeuvre utile: la mesure de l’ambition chez Vitruve’ in Le Projet de Vitruve: Objet, Destinaires et Reception du de Architectura. Paris: 4761.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, G. (1961). ‘A Postscript on Horace, Carm., 1.2’, American Journal of Philology, 82. 4: 406–17.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (1985). ‘Single Combat in the Roman Republic’, The Classical Quarterly 35: 392410.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (1997). A Commentary on Livy, Books VI–X. Vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (1998). A Commentary on Livy: Books VI–X. Vol. 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Oexle, O. (1995). ‘Memoria als Kultur’, in Oexle, O. (ed.), Memoria als Kultur. Göttingen: 978.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. (1965). A Commentary on Livy: Books I–V. Oxford.Google Scholar
Olick, J. and Robbins, J. (1998). ‘Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices’, Annual Review of Sociology 24: 105–40.Google Scholar
Olick, J., Vintizky-Seroussi, V. and Levy, D. (eds.) (2011). The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Omme, A. N. van. (1946). Virtus, semantiese Studie. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Orlandi, S. (2008). ‘Le iscrizioni del ponte Fabricio viste da vicino’, in Caldelli, M. L., Gregori, G. L. and Orlandi, S. (eds.), Epigrafia 2006 (Atti della XIV Rencontre sur l’épigraphie in onore di Silvio Panciera con altri contributi di colleghi, allievi e collaboratori). Rome: 177–86.Google Scholar
Orlin, E. M. (2002). Temples, Religion, and Politics in the Roman Republic. Boston and Leiden.Google Scholar
Orlin, E. M. (2007). ‘Augustan Religion and the Reshaping of Roman Memory’, Arethusa 40: 7392.Google Scholar
Orlin, E. M. (2016) ‘Augustan reconstruction and Roman memory’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford, 115-44.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2006). Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oskanish, J. (2016). ‘Vitruvius and the Programmatics of Prose’, Arethusa 49: 263–80.Google Scholar
Osten, M. (2008). La memoria robada. Los sistemas digitales y la destrucción de la cultura del recuerdo. Breve historia del olvido. Madrid.Google Scholar
Östenberg, I. (2009). Staging the World: Spoils, Captives and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession. Oxford.Google Scholar
Palmer, M. E. (2019). ‘Inscriptional Intermediality in Livy’. Trends in Classics 11: 7495.Google Scholar
Palombi, D. (1996). ‘Hercules Victor, Aedes et Signum’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. Vol. 3: 23–5.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. (2005). ‘Non-verbal Behaviour on the Roman Comic Stage’, in Cairns, D. L. (ed.), Body Language in the Greek and Roman World. Swansea: 124.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. (2018). The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome. Latin Poetic Responses to Early Imperial Iconography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Paparazzo, E. (2021). A study of Varro’s account of Roman civil theology in the Antiquitates rerum divinarum and its reception by Augustine and modern readers’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 111: 179–244.Google Scholar
Parker, H. (1996). ‘Plautus vs. Terence: Audience and Popularity Re-Examined’, American Journal of Philology 117: 585617.Google Scholar
Parrish, D. (1984). Season Mosaics of Roman North Africa. Rome.Google Scholar
Pasco-Pranger, M. (2006). Founding the Year Ovid’s Fasti and the Poetics of the Roman Calendar. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Pasco-Pranger, M. (2012). ‘Naming Cato(s)’, Classical Journal 108: 135.Google Scholar
Pauly, A., Wissowa, G. and Kroll, W. (eds.) (1893–). Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pavolini, C. (2006). Ostia (Guide archeologiche Laterza). Rome and Bari. (1st ed. 1983).Google Scholar
Pecchiura, P. (1965). La Figura di Catone Uticense Nella Letterature Latina. Torino.Google Scholar
Peer, A. (2015). Julius Caesar’s Bellum Civile and the Composition of a New Reality. New York.Google Scholar
Peglau, M. (2003). ‘M. Varro, ein Antiquar zwischen Tradition und Aufklärung’, in Haltenhoff, A., Heil, A. and Mutschler, F.-H. (eds.), O tempora, o mores! Römische Werte und römische Literatur in den letzten Jahrzehnten der Republik. Munich: 137–64.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1996). ‘The Triumviral Period’, in Cambridge Ancient History X2. Cambridge: 169.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2011). Plutarch Caesar: Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. (2007). ‘Ostiensium marmorum decus et decor’: studi architettonici, decorative e archeometrici. Rome.Google Scholar
Perelli, L. (1982). Il movimento popolare nell’ ultimo secolo della Repubblica. Torino.Google Scholar
Peter, H. (1902). ‘Die Epochen in Varros Werk De gente populi Romani’, Rheinisches Museum 57: 231–51.Google Scholar
Petrochilos, N. (1974). Roman Attitudes to the Greeks. Athens.Google Scholar
Petrone, G. (1983). Teatro antico e inganno: finzioni plautine. Palermo.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. A. (2003). ‘Archaic Corinthian Architecture, ca. 600 to 480 BC’, in Williams, C. K. II and Bookidis, N. (eds.), Corinth, the Centenary: 1896–1996. Princeton.Google Scholar
Pfeilschifter, R. (2009). ‘Die Römer auf der Flucht. Republikanische Feste und Sinnstiftung durch aitiologischen Mythos’, in Beck, H. and Wiemer, H.-U. (eds.), Feiern und Erinnern: Geschichtsbilder im Spiegel Antiker Feste (Studien zur Alten Geschichte 12). Berlin: 109–39.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. E. (1974). ‘Form and Language in Livy’s Triumph Notices’, Classical Philology 69: 265–73.Google Scholar
Pichlmayr, F. (1911). Aurelius Victor. De viris illustribus (‘On famous men’). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pieczonka, J. (2016). ‘Family Relations of Stock Characters in Atellan Farce – a Few Remarks on the Influence of Palliata on Atellana’, Graeco-Latina Brunensia 21: 229–46.Google Scholar
Pietilä-Castrén, L. (1987). Magnificentia Publica: The Victory Monuments of the Generals in the Era Generals in the Era of the Punic Wars. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (1996). Contra arma verbis: der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik (Bd. 22). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (1989). Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Pinto, P. M. (2010). ‘Monumenti d’autore e storie di testi (Isocrate, Ennio, Oraziov), Philologus 154: 2539.Google Scholar
Piras, G. (1998). Varrone e i poetica verba: studio sul settimo libro del De lingua latina. Bologna.Google Scholar
Piras, G. (2017). ‘Dicam dumtaxat quod est historicon: Varro and/on the Past’, in Arena, V. and Mac Góráin, F. (eds.), Varronian Moments. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 60. London: 820.Google Scholar
Pittenger, M. R. P. (2008). Contested Triumphs: Politics, Pageantry, and Performance in Livy’s Republican Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Poinssot, L. (1929). L’autel de la Gens Augusta à Carthage. Tunis and Paris.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. (2012). From Republic to Empire: Rhetoric, Religion, and Power in the Visual Culture of Ancient Rome. Norman.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1966). The Art of Rome, c. 753 B.C.–337 A.D.: Sources and Documents. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1978). ‘The Impact of Greek Art on Rome’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 108: 155–74.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1988). Art in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Popkin, M. J. (2016). The Architecture of the Roman Triumph: Monuments, Memory, and Identity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Porter, D. H. (1987). Horace’s Poetic Journey. A Reading of Odes 1–3. Princeton.Google Scholar
Poulsen, F. (1937). ‘Die Römer in der republikanischen Zeit und ihre Stellung zur Kunst’, Die Antike 13: 125–50.Google Scholar
Prag, J. (2013). ‘Epigraphy in the Western Mediterranean: A Hellenistic Phenomenon?’ in Prag, J. and Crawley Quinn, J. (eds.), The Hellenistic West: Rethinking the Ancient Mediterranean. Cambridge: 320–48.Google Scholar
Prokoph, F. M. (2015). ‘Cornelius Nepos und ein Stück Literaturgeschichte. Indizien zur Chronologie der Imagines des Atticus und des Varro’, in Dunsch, B. and Prokoph, F. M. (eds.), Geschichte und Gegenwart. Beiträge zu Cornelius Nepos aus Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik und Unterrichtspraxis. Wiesbaden: 85136.Google Scholar
Proshansky, H. M. (1978). ‘The City and Self-Identity’, Environment and Behavior 10: 147–69.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. (1995). ‘On the Sacking of Carthage and Corinth’, in Innes, D., Hines, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his 75th Birthday. Oxford: 133–48.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. (2003). ‘Becoming Historical: The Roman Case’, in Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.), Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter: 1240.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (1993). Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. and Samons, L. J. II (1990). ‘Opposition to Augustus’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate. Berkeley: 417–54.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (1933). Cicero. De Natura Deorum. Academica. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (1952). Natural History. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rajewsky, I. O. (2002). Intermedialität. Tübingen and Basel.Google Scholar
Rakob, F. (2000). ‘The Making of Augustan Carthage’, in Fentress, E. (ed.), Romanization and the City. Creation, Transformations, and Failures. Proceedings of a Conference Held at the American Academy in Rome, 14–16 May 1998. Portsmouth: 7282.Google Scholar
Ramsay, D. (2015). American Media and the Memory of World War II. New York.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (ed.) (2007a). Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (2007b). Cicero, Philippics 1–2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (2014). ‘The Recovery of More Ennius from a Misinformed Ciceronian Scholiast’, Classical Quarterly 64. 1, 160–65.Google Scholar
Raubitschek, A. E. (1957). ‘Brutus in Athens’, Phoenix 11: 111.Google Scholar
Raubitschek, A. E. (1959). ‘The Brutus Statue in Athens’, in Atti del Terzo Congresso Internazionale di Epigrafia Greca e Latina: 1521.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1972). ‘Cicero the Historian and Cicero the Antiquarian’, Journal of Roman Studies 62: 3345.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1973). ‘The Eastern Clientelae of Clodius and the Claudii’, Historia: Zeitschrift Für Alte Geschichte 22(2): 219–39.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985). ‘Cicero and the Areopagus’, Athenaeum 63: 4467.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1986). ‘Cassius and Brutus: The Memory of the Liberators’, in Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Past Perspectives. Cambridge: 101–19 = (1991), Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers. Oxford: 488507.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1991). Roman Culture and Society. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1994). ‘Caesar: Civil War and Dictatorship’, in Crook, J. A., Lintott, A. and Rawson, E. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History IX. Cambridge: 424–67.Google Scholar
Rea, J. A. (2007). Legendary Rome: Myth, Monuments, and Memory on the Palatine and Capitoline. London.Google Scholar
Reusser, C. (1993a). ‘Area Capitolina’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. Vol. 1: 114–17.Google Scholar
Reusser, C. (1993b). ‘Capitolium (Republik und Kaiserzeit)’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae Vol. 1: 232–3.Google Scholar
Rice-Holmes, T. (1928). The Architect of the Roman Empire, 44 BC–27 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. and Shipley, G. (eds.) (1993). War and Society in the Roman World. London.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. and Williams, J. H. C. (1999). ‘Leges et iura p. R. restituit: A New Aureus of Octavian and the Settlement of 28–27 BC’, Numismatic Chronicle 159: 169213.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. S. (1986). Hispaniae: Spain and the Development of Roman Imperialism, 218–82 B.C. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1992). The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. New York.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (2014). ‘Talking to Slaves in the Plautine Audience’, Classical Antiquity 33: 174216.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (2017). Slave Theater in the Roman Republic: Plautus and Popular Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (2000). La mémoire, l’histoire et l’oubli. Paris.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. T. (1983). ‘Falsi triumphi, plures consulatus’, Latomus 42: 372–82.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (1999). Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome. Austin.Google Scholar
Rigney, A. (2005). ‘Plenitude, Scarcity, and the Circulation of Cultural Memory’, Journal of European Studies 35: 1128.Google Scholar
Rigney, A. (2008). ‘The Dynamics of Remembrance: Texts between Monumentality and Morphing’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Rigney, A. (2012). The Afterlives of Walter Scott: Memory on the Move. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rigney, A. (2016). ‘Cultural Memory Studies: Mediation, Narrative, and the Aesthetic’, in Tota, A. L. and Hagen, T. (eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies. London: 6576.Google Scholar
Ripollès, P. (2005). ‘Coinage and Identity in the Roman Provinces: Spain’, in Howgego, C., Heuchert, V. and Burnett, A. (eds.), Coinage and Identity in the Roman Provinces. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rives, J. B. (1995). Religion and Authority in Roman Carthage from Augustus to Constantine. Oxford.Google Scholar
Robb, M. A. (2010). Beyond Populares and Optimates: Political Language in the Late Republic. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Robert, R. (1995). ‘Immensa potentia artis: prestige et statut des œuvres d’art à Rome, à la fin de la république et au début de l’empire’, Revue Archéologique (Nouvelle Série) 2: 291