A Critique of Archaeological Reason Structural, Digital, and Philosophical Aspects of the Excavated Record
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 May 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Critique of Archaeological ReasonStructural, Digital, and Philosophical Aspects of the Excavated Record, pp. 358 - 375Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bibliography
Laerke Recht has compiled this bibliography using as a starting point the annotated bibliography found in the website Critique Online, to which she contributed a number of entries and of which she serves as Associate Editor. She also prepared the inline references in the text of this book. For this I am most grateful to her.
It must be stressed that the bibliography given here is only indicative. The inline references are selective and with different degrees of relevance to the text. The full version, with comments on each title and with additional notes to the text of this book, will be found in the dedicated website Critique Online that accompanies this volume.
Links to websites are given at the end of this Bibliography.
Critique Online: www.critique-of-AR.net.
Grammar: www.urkesh.org/h/grammar.htm.
Grotte Chauvet: http://archeologie.culture.fr/chauvet/en.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/archives/.
Urkesh Website: www.urkesh.org.
Global Record and Urkesh Global Record refer to the pertinent section within the Urkesh Website.
W3C Semantic Web: www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL.
all sites last accessed on January 19, 2017
Abadia, Oscar Moro, and Palacio-Pérez, Eduardo. 2015. “Rethinking the Structural Analysis of Palaeolithic Art: New Perspectives on Leroi-Gourhan’s Structuralism.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 25: 657–72.Google Scholar
Adams, Ernest W., and Adams, William Y.. 1987. “Purpose and Scientific Concept Formation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4): 419–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, William Y., and Adams, Ernest W.. 2007. Archaeological Typology and Practical Reality: A Dialectical Approach to Artifact Classification and Sorting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agnew, Neville, and Bridgland, Janet, eds. 2006. Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.Google Scholar
Allais, Lucia. 2013. “Integrities: The Salvage of Abu Simbel.” Grey Room 50 (Winter 2013): 6–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammerman, Albert J. 1992. “Taking Stock of Quantitative Archaeology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 21 (1): 231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arakawa, Takahiro, Iitani, Kenta, Wang, Xin, Kajiro, Takumi, Toma, Koji, Yano, Kazuyoshi and Mitsubayashi, Kohji. 2015. “A Sniffer-Camera for Imaging of Ethanol Vaporization from Wine: The Effect of Wine Glass Shape.” Analyst 140 (8): 2881–86.Google ScholarPubMed
Areshian, Gregory. 2003. “The Zoomorphic Code of the Proto-Indo-European Mythological Cycle of ‘Birth-Death-Resurrection’: A Linguistic-Archaeological Reconstruction.” In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference: Los Angeles, November 8–9, 2002, edited by Jones-Bley, K., Huld, M.E., Volpe, A. Della and Dexter, M.R., 228–49. Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Areshian, Gregory. 2006. “Sequences of Signs: Eurasian Archaeology from a Perspective of Cultural Semiotics.” In Beyond the Steppe and the Sown: Proceedings of the 2002 University of Chicago Conference on Eurasian Archaeology, edited by Peterson, David L., Popova, Laura M. and Smith, Adam T., 282–95. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Atalay, Sonya, Clauss, Lee Rains, McGuire, Randall H., and Welch, John R.. 2014. Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Bahn, Paul G., ed. 2012. Cave Art: A Guide to the Decorated Ice Age Caves of Europe. Revised edition (first edition 2007). London: Frances Lincoln.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Zainab. 2006. “Race and Ethnicity in Mesopotamian Antiquity.” World Archaeology 38 (1): 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barceló, Juan A., Forte, Maurizio and Sanders, Donald H., eds. 2000. Virtual Reality in Archaeology. British Archaeological Reports International Series 843. Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Graeme. 1999. Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Philip. 1982. Techniques of Archaeological Excavation. Second edition. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Translated by Glaser, Sheila Faria. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, C.J., Caspers, Britta and Jung, Werber, eds. 2010. Georg Lukács: Kritiker der unreinen Vernunft. Studien des Gesellschaftswissenschaftlichen Institutes Bochum 3. Duisburg: Universitätsverlag Rhein-Ruhr.Google Scholar
Beck, Anthony, and Neylon, Cameron. 2012. “A Vision for Open Archaeology.” World Archaeology 44 (4): 479–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Jörg, Hempelmann, Ralph and Rehm, Ellen, eds. 2010. Kulturlandschaft Syrien: Zentrum und Peripherie. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony. 2004. Pasts beyond Memory: Evolution, Museums, Colonialism. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berggren, Åsa, Dell’Unto, Nicolo, Forte, Maurizio, Haddow, Scott, Hodder, Ian, Issavi, Justine, Lercari, Nicola, Mazzucato, Camilla, Mickel, Allison and Taylor, James S.. 2015. “Revisiting Reflexive Archaeology at Çatalhöyük: Integrating Digital and 3D Technologies at the Trowel’s Edge.” Antiquity 89 (344): 433–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernbeck, Reinhard. 1997. Theorien in der Archäologie. Uni-Taschenbücher. Tübingen and Basel: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, Tim, Headler, J. and Lassila, O.. 2001. “The Semantic Web.” Scientific American May 2001: 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berners-Lee, Tim, Shadholt, Nigel and Hall, Wendy. 2008. “The Semantic Web Revisited.” IEEE Intelligent Systems May–June 2006: 96–101.Google Scholar
Berry, D., ed. 2012. Understanding Digital Humanities. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, Christian. 2015. “Edmund Husserl.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Summer 2015. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/husserl/ (accessed January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1962. “Archaeology as Anthropology.” American Antiquity 28 (2): 217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1972. An Archaeological Perspective. New York and London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc. 1949. Apologie pour l’histoire ou métier d’historien. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2015. “Critical Theory.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Winter 2015. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/critical-theory/ (accessed January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Bradley, Richard. 2006. “The Excavation Report as a Literary Genre: Traditional Practice in Britain.” World Archaeology 38 (4): 664–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breglia, Lisa. 2006. Monumental Ambivalence: The Politics of Heritage. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. 2008. “Arcesilaus.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Fall 2008. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/arcesilaus/ (accessed January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Browman, David L., and Givens, Douglas R.. 1996. “Stratigraphic Excavation: The First ‘New Archaeology.’” American Anthropologist 98 (1): 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Clifford. 2010. “Reflections on Metaarchaeology.” In Advancing Phenomenology: Essays in Honor of Lester Embree, edited by Blosser, Philip and Nenon, Thomas, 391–400. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Brown, James A. 1982. “On the Structure of Artifact Typology.” In Essays on Archaeological Typology, edited by Whallon, Robert and Brown, James A., 176–89. Evanston, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
Brughmans, Tom. 2012. “Thinking Through Networks: A Review of Formal Network Methods in Archaeology.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 20 (4): 623–62.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Federico. 2010. “The Monumental Temple Terrace at Urkesh and its Setting.” In Kulturlandschaft Syrien: Zentrum und Peripherie. Festschrift für Jan-Waalke Meyer, edited by Becker, J., Hempelmann, R. and Rehm, E., 71–85. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Federico. 2016. Three-dimensional Volumetric Analysis in an Archaeological Context The Palace of Tupkish at Urkesh and its Representation. Urkesh/Mozan Studies, Vol. 7. Malibu: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 1981a. “Stratigraphic Sections.” In The Student’s Guide to Archaeological Illustrating, edited by Dillon, Brian, 17–21. Archaeological Research Tools 1. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 1981b. “The Origin of Writing and the Beginning of History.” In The Shape of the Past: Studies in Honor of Franklin D. Murphy, edited by Buccellati, Giorgio and Speroni, Charles, 3–13. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology and Office of the Chancellor, University of California.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 1990. “On Poetry – Theirs and Ours.” In Lingering over Words: Studies in Ancient Near Eastern Literature in Honor of William L. Moran, edited by Abusch, T., Huehnergard, J. and Steinkeller, P., 105–34. Harvard Semitic Studies 37. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 2000. “On Poetry and Friendship: Linear and Tensional Elements in the Old Babylonian Episode of Gilgamesh and Enkidu.” In Donum Natalicium: Studi in onore di Claudio Saporetti in occasione del suo 60°compleanno, edited by Scafa, P. Negri and Gentili, P., 63–76. Rome: Borgia.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 2006a. “An Archaeologist on Mars.” In Confronting the Past: Archaeological and Historical Essays on Ancient Israel in Honor of William G. Dever, edited by Gitin, Seymour, Wright, J. Edward and Dessel, J.P., 17–21. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 2006b. “On (e)-tic and -emic.” Backdirt. Newsletter of the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Winter 2006: 12–13.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 2010a. “The Semiotics of Ethnicity: The Case of Hurrian Urkesh.” In Festschrift für Gernot Wilhelm anläßlich seines 65. Geburtstages am 28. Januar 2010, edited by Fincke, Jeanette, 79–90. Dresden: ISLET.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 2010b. “The Urkesh Temple Terrace: Function and Perception.” In Kulturlandschaft Syrien: Zentrum und Peripherie, edited by Becker, Jörg, Hempelmann, Ralph, and Rehm, Ellen, 87–106. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 2012. “Towards a Linguistic Model for Archaeology.” Revue d’assyriologie et d’archéologie orientale 106 (1): 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 2013a. “When Were the Hurrians Hurrian? The Persistence of Ethnicity in Urkesh.” In Cultures in Contact: From Mesopotamia to the Mediterranean in the Second Millennium B.C, edited by Aruz, Joan, Graff, Sarah B., and Rakic, Yelena, 84–95. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 2013b. Alle origini della politica. La formazione e la crescita dello stato in Siro-Mesopotamia. Milano: Jaca Book.Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio, and Rouault, Olivier. 1983. “Terqa Preliminary Report, N. 12: Digital Plotting of Archaeological Floor Plans.” Computer Aided Research in Near Eastern Studies 1 (1): 3–40.Google Scholar
Bulhof, Ilse N. 1980. Wilhelm Dilthey: A Hermeneutic Approach to the Study of History and Culture. The Hauge, Boston and London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Heather, and Smith, Claire. 2004. The Archaeologist’s Field Handbook. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Calvin, William H., and Bickerton, Derek. 2001. Lingua Ex Machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the Human Brain. London: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Ewan, and Leiper, Rob. 2013. “Digging Deeper in the Archaeological Psyche.” Antiquity 87 (336): 589–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carandini, Andrea. 1991. Storei dalla terra: Manuale di scavo archeologico. 2nd ed. Saggi 752. Torino: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar
Carman, John. 2006. “Digging the Dirt: Excavation as a Social Practice.” In Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations, edited by Edgeworth, Matt, 95–102. London, New York, Toronto, Oxford: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
Carr, Christopher, ed. 1985. For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: Bridging Data Structure, Quantitative Technique, and Theory. Kansas City: Westport Publishers.Google Scholar
Carr, Nicholas. 2008. “Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains.” The Atlantic, August. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/ (accessed on January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1999. The Origins of Complex Language: An Inquiry Into the Evolutionary Beginnings of Sentences, Syllables, and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, Geoff. 2011. “Reflections on the Archaeology of Archaeological Excavations.” Archaeological Dialogues 18 (1): 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, Geoff. 2012. “How to Archaeologize with a Hammer.” In Reconsidering Archaeological Fieldwork: Exploring On-Site Relationships between Theory and Practice, edited by Cobb, Hannah, Harris, Oliver J.T., Jones, Cara, and Richardson, Philip, 15–29. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, Geoff, and Lang, Matthias. 2013. “Reflections on the Rocky Road to E-Archaeology.” In Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, 26–29 March 2012, edited by Earl, Graeme, Sly, Tim, Chrysanthi, Patricia, Murrieta-Flores, Patricia, Papadopoulos, Constantinos, Romanowska, Iza, and Wheatley, David, 224–36. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, Martin. 2005. “Key Ideas in Excavation.” In Archaeology: The Key Concepts, edited by Renfrew, Colin and Bahn, Paul G., 79–83. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Casey, Edward S. 2004. “Public Memory in Place and Time.” In Framing Public Memory, edited by Phillips, Kendall R., 17–44. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1923. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Teil 1: Die Sprache. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 2000. “Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff.” In Gesammelte Werke Hamburger Ausgabe. Vol. VI. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Caws, Peter. 1997. Structuralism: A Philosophy for the Human Sciences. 2nd ed. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Cherry, John F. 2011. “Still Not Digging, Much.” Archaeological Dialogues 18 (1): 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V. Gordon. 1946. “Archaeology and Anthropology.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 2 (3): 243–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V. Gordon. 1950. “The Urban Revolution.” Town Planning Review 21 (1): 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicovacki, Predrag, ed. 2001. Kant’s Legacy: Essays in Honor of Lewis White Beck. Woodbridge: University Rochester Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, David L. 1973. “Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence.” Antiquity XLVII: 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, David L. 1978. Analytical Archaeology. Edited by Chapman, Bob. 2nd ed. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collar, Anna, Coward, Fiona, Brughmans, Tom, and Mills, Barbara J.. 2015. “Networks in Archaeology: Phenomena, Abstraction, Representation.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooney, Gabriel. 2009. “European and Global Archaeologies.” World Archaeology 41 (4): 626–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Hugh. 2013. “Can You Hack (the) Communication?” In Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, 26–29 March 2012, edited by Earl, Graeme, Sly, Tim, Chrysanthi, Patricia, Murrieta-Flores, Patricia, Papadopoulos, Constantinos, Romanowska, Iza, and Wheatley, David, 49–54. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Courbin, Paul. 1988. What Is Archaeology? An Essay on the Nature of Archaeological Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cowgill, L.C. 1982. “Cluster of Objects and Association of Variables: Two Approaches to Archaeological Classification.” In Essays on Archaeological Typology, edited by Whallon, R. and Brown, J.A., 30–55. Evanston, Illinois: Center For American Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
Cull, Barry W. 2011. “Reading Revolutions: Online Digital Text and Implications for Reading in Academe.” First Monday 16 (6). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3340 (accessed January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Dallas, Costis. 2015. “Jean-Claude Gardin on Archaeological Data, Representation and Knowledge: Implications for Digital Archaeology.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23 (1): 305–30.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1958. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809–1882. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Davey, Nicholas. 2006. Unquiet Understanding: Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Raemy, Daniel, Feihl, Olivier, Golay, Laurent, Pedrucci, Anna, Dresco, Jean-Pierre, Nicollier, Jean. 1999. Chillon. La chapelle. d’archéologie romande, Cahiers, N. 79. Lausanne: Association du Château de Chillon.Google Scholar
Derricourt, Robin. 2012. “Pseudoarchaeology: The Concept and Its Limitations.” Antiquity 86 (332): 524–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1967. Cours de linguistique générale. Edited by Engler, Rudolf. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1986. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Harris, Roy. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
Díaz-Andreu, Margarita. 2008. A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dobres, Marcia-Anne, and Robb, John E.. 2005. “‘Doing’ Agency: Introductory Remarks on Methodology.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12 (3): 159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducke, Benjamin. 2012. “Natives of a Connected World: Free and Open Source Software in Archaeology.” World Archaeology 44 (4): 571–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, Graeme, Sly, Tim, Chrysanthi, Patricia, Murrieta-Flores, Patricia, Papadopoulos, Constantinos, Romanowska, Iza, and Wheatley, David, eds. 2013. Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, 26–29 March 2012. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, Matt, ed. 2006. Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations. London: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, Matt, ed. 2011. “Excavation as a Ground for Archaeological Knowledge.” Archaeological Dialogues 18 (1): 44–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggert, Manfred K. H. 2001. Prähistorische Archäologie: Konzepte und Methoden. Uni-Taschenbücher 2092. Tübingen and Basel: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles, and Gould, S.J.. 1972. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology, edited by Schopf, T.J.M., 82–115. San Francisco: Freeman Cooper.Google Scholar
Embree, Lester, ed. 1992. Metaarchaeology: Reflections by Archaeologists and Philosophers. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 147. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Thomas L., and Daly, Patrick, eds. 2006. Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fagan, Garrett G. 2006. Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. Abingdon: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Figal, Günther. 2006. Gegenständlichkeit: Das Hermeneutische und die Philosophie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Fogelin, Lars. 2007. “Inference to the Best Explanation: A Common and Effective Form of Archaeological Reasoning.” American Antiquity 72 (4): 603–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, John Miles. 1991. Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Frabetti, Federica. 2011. “Rethinking the Digital Humanities in the Context of Originary Technicity.” Culture Machine 12: 1–22.Google Scholar
Friendly, Michael. 2002. “Visions and Re-Visions of Charles Joseph Minard.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 27 (1): 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated by Linge, David E.. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1986. Hermeneutik I. Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Gesammelte Werke 1. Tübingen: Morh Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gardin, Jean-Claude. 1970. Archéologie et calculateurs: problèmes sémiologiques et mathématiques, Marseille 7–12 avril, 1969. Colloques internatinaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Sciences humaines. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Gardin, Jean-Claude. 1980. Archaeological Constructs: An Aspect of Theoretical Archaeology. Cambridge and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Editions de la maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
Gardner, Andrew. 2008. “Agency.” In Handbook of Archaeological Theories, edited by Bentley, R. Alexander, Maschner, Herbert D. G., and Chippindale, Christopher, 95–108. Lanham, New York, Toronto and Plymouth: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Gero, Joan M. 1996. “Archaeological Practice and Gendered Encounters with Field Data.” In Gender and Archaeology, edited by Wright, Rita P., 251–80. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy, and Malle, Bertram F., eds. 2002. The Evolution of Language Out of Pre-Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Mark, and Toohey, Peter, eds. 1997. Inventing Ancient Culture: Historicism, Periodization and the Ancient World. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goode, James F. 2007. Negotiating for the Past: Archaeology, Nationalism, and Diplomacy in the Middle East, 1919–1941. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gosden, Christopher. 1999. Anthropology and Archaeology: A Changing Relationship. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gosden, Christopher, and Marshall, Yvonne. 1999. “The Cultural Biography of Objects.” World Archaeology 31 (2): 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Michelle. 2012. “Kant’s Critique of Metaphysics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Summer 2012. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/kant-metaphysics/ (accessed January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Gumerman, George J., and Phillips, David A.. 1978. “Archaeology beyond Anthropology.” American Antiquity 43 (2): 184–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Anthony. 2009. “Towards a European Archaeology.” World Archaeology 41 (4): 629–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Edward C. 1975. “The Stratigraphic Sequence: A Question of Time.” World Archaeology 7 (1): 109–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Edward C. 1979. “The Laws of Archaeological Stratigraphy.” World Archaeology 11 (1): 111–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Edward C. 1989. Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. Second edition. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Rodney. 2011. “Surface Assemblages: Towards an Archaeology in and of the Present.” Archaeological Dialogues 18 (02): 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Roy. 1987. Reading Saussure: A Critical Commentary on the Cours de Linguistique Générale. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hauser, Rick. 2007. Reading Figurines: Animal Representations in Terra Cotta from Royal Building AK at Urkesh (Tell Mozan). Urkesh/Mozan Studies 5. Malibu: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Christopher. 1954. “Archaeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestions from the Old World.” American Anthropologist 56 (2): 155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, Brian. 1984. “Are Emic Types Relevant to Archaeology?” Ethnohistory 31 (2): 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. 2005. My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headland, Thomas N., Pike, Kenneth L., and Harris, Marvin. 1990. Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate. Newbury Parl, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hegmon, Michelle, and Kulow, Stephanie. 2005. “Painting as Agency, Style as Structure: Innovations in Mimbres Pottery Designs from Southwest New Mexico.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12 (4): 313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2000. Üder den Humanismus. 10th ed. Frankfurt am Mein: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Herz, Norman, and Garrison, Ervan G.. 1997. Geological Methods for Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, James N. 1978. “Individuals and Their Artifacts: An Experimental Study in Archaeology.” American Antiquity 43 (2): 245–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, Ian. 1982. The Present Past: An Introduction to Anthropology for Archaeologists. New York: Pica Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian. 2002. “Ethics and Archaeology: The Attempt at Çatalhöyük.” Near Eastern Archaeology 65 (3): 174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, Ian. 2003. Archaeology Beyond Dialogue. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, and Hutson, Scott. 2003. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, Ian, Shanks, Michael, Alexandri, Alexandra, Buchli, Victor, Carman, John, Last, Jonathan, and Lucas, Gavin. 1995. Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodson, F.R. 1982. “Some Aspects of Archaeological Classification.” In Essays on Archaeological Typology, edited by Whallon, Robert and Brown, James A., 21–29. Evanston, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
Hoehndorf, Robert. 2010. “What Is an Upper Level Ontology?” Ontogenesis. April 13. http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/740 (accessed on January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Holly, Michael Ann. 1984. Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Holly, Michael Ann. 1996. Past Looking: Historical Imagination and the Rhetoric of the Image. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horning, Audrey. 2011. “Compelling Futures and Ever-Present Pasts: Realigning the Archaeology of Us.” Archaeological Dialogues 18 (02): 161–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, Jeremy. 2012. “Lost in Information? Ways of Knowing and Modes of Representation in E-Archaeology.” World Archaeology 44 (4): 538–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, Jeremy. 2013. “Reflections on the Rocky Road to E-Archaeology.” In Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, 26–29 March 2012, edited by Earl, Graeme, Sly, Tim, Chrysanthi, Patricia, Murrieta-Flores, Patricia, Papadopoulos, Constantinos, Romanowska, Iza, and Wheatley, David, 13–24. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Hurt, Teresa D., and Rakita, Gordon F. M., eds. 2001. Style and Function: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Archaeology. Westport and London: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1913. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Vol. 1. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 1. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1991. On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Translated by Brough, John Barnett. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, M. D. 1970. “Linguistic Models in Archaeology.” In Archéologie et Calculateurs: Prblèmes Sémiologiques et Mathématiques, Marseille, 7–12 Avril, 1969, edited by Gardin, Jean-Claude, 91–120. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Jabr, Ferris. 2013. “The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens.” Scientific American, April 11. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/ (accessed on January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Jameson, John H., and Baugher, Sherene, eds. 2007. Past Meets Present: Archaeologists Partnering with Museum Curators, Teachers, and Community Groups. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, Stuart. 2012. “A New Digital Dark Age? Collaborative Web Tools, Social Media and Long-Term Preservation.” World Archaeology 44 (4): 553–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jingchen, Wang. 2006. “The Conservation and Presentation of Large-Scale Archaeological Sites in Liaoning, China.” In Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation, edited by Agnew, Neville and Bridgland, Janet, 298–302. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.Google Scholar
Johnsen, Harald, and Olsen, Bjornar. 1992. “Hermeneutics and Archaeology: On the Philosophy of Contextual Archaeology.” American Antiquity 57 (3): 419–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Matthew H. 2006. “On the Nature of Theoretical Archaeology and Archaeological Theory.” Archaeological Dialogues 13 (02): 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolles, Frank. 1999. “German Romantic Chronology and Its Impact on the Interpretation of Prehistory.” In Time and Archaeology, edited by Murray, Tim, 49–60. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Andrew. 2007. Memory and Material Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones-Bley, K., Huld, M.E., Della Volpe, A., and Dexter, M.R., eds. 2003. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference: Los Angeles, November 8–9, 2002. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 47. Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Joukowsky, Martha. 1980. A Complete Manual of Field Archaeology: Tools and Techniques of Field Work for Archaeologists. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Jung, Carl Gustav. 1985. Die Archetypen und das kollektive Unbewußte. Vol. I. Gesammelte Werke 9. Olten: Walter-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kansa, Eric. 2012. “Openness and Archaeology’s Information Ecosystem.” World Archaeology 44 (4): 498–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kansa, Eric C., and Kansa, Sarah Whitcher. 2013. “We All Know That a 14 Is a Sheep: Data Publication and Professionalism in Archaeological Communication.” ResearchGate 1 (1): 88–97.Google Scholar
Kansa, Eric C., Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, Burton, Margie M., and Stankowski, Cindy. 2010. “Googling the Grey: Open Data, Web Services, and Semantics.” Archaeologies 6 (2): 301–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kansa, Eric C., Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, and Watrall, Ethan, eds. 2011. Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration. Cotsen Digital Archaeology 1. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1781. Kritik der reinen Vernuft. 1st edition (2nd edition 1787). Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1785. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1786. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.Google Scholar
Karatani, Kojin. 1977. Transcritique: On Kant and Marx. Translated by Koshu, Sabu. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Håkan, and Gustafsson, Anders. 2006. “Among Totem Poles and Clan Power in Tanum, Sweden: An Ethnographic Perspective on Communicative Artifacts of Heritage Management.” In Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations, edited by Edgeworth, Matt, 137–47. London: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
Keesing, Roger M. 1972. “Paradigms Lost: The New Ethnography and the New Linguistics.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 28 (4): 299–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly-Buccellati, Marilyn. 1977. “Towards the Use of Quantitative Analysis in Mesopotamian Sphragistics,” Mesopotamia 11, pp. 41–52.Google Scholar
King, Barbara J., ed. 1999. The Origins of Language: What Nonhuman Primates Can Tell Us. Santa Fe and Oxford: School of American Research Press and James Currey Publishers.Google Scholar
Klejn, Leo S. 2001. Meta Archaeology. Edited by Sindbæk, Søren M., Simpson, Ian R., and Randsborg, Klavs. Acta Archaeologica 72. Copenhagen: Blackwell-Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kosso, Peter. 2001. Knowing the Past: Philosophical Issues of History and Archaeology. Amherst: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Kramer, Carol, ed. 1979. Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Krieger, William Harvey. 2006. Can There Be a Philosophy of Archaeology? Processual Archaeology and the Philosophy of Science. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Frederick Wilfrid. 2003. Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Campaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Layton, Robert, Stone, Peter G., and Thomas, J., eds. 2001. Destruction and Conservation of Cultural Property. One World Archaeology 41. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1945. “L’analyse structurale en linguistique et en anthropologie.” Word. Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New York 1: 1–21.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1952. “La notion de structure en ethnologie.” In Anthropology Today, edited by Kroeber, A.L., 524–53. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1955. “The Structural Study of Myth.” Journal of American Folklore 78: 428–44.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Philip. 2002. Human Language and Our Reptilian Brain: The Subcortical Bases of Speech, Syntax, and Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Livingston, Paisley. 2005. Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Gavin. 2001a. “Destruction and the Rhetoric of Excavation.” Norwegian Archaeological Review 34 (1): 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Gavin. 2001b. Critical Approaches to Fieldwork: Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Gavin. 2010. “Triangulating Absence: Exploring the Fault Lines between Archaeology and Anthropology.” In Archaeology and Anthropology: Understanding Similarity, Exploring Difference, edited by Garrow, Duncan and Yarrow, Thomas, 28–39. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Lucas, Gavin. 2013. “Afterword: Archaeology and the Science of New Objects.” In Archaeology after Interpretation: Returning Materials to Archaeological Theory, edited by Alberti, Benjamin, Jones, Andrew Meirion, and Pollard, Joshua, 369–80. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, Gavin. 2015. “Archaeology and Contemporaneity.” Archaeological Dialogues 22 (01): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R. Lee. 2007. “Archaeology’s Quest for a Seat at the High Table of Anthropology.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26 (2): 133–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R. Lee. 2012. “A Historical Sketch on the Concepts of Archaeological Association, Context, and Provenience.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 19 (2): 207–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Richard. 2006. “Whose Archaeology? Social Considerations in Archaeological Research Design.” In Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation, edited by Agnew, Neville and Bridgland, Janet, 131–35. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.Google Scholar
Madella, Marco, Rondelli, Bernardo, Lancelotti, Carla, Balbo, Andrea, Zurro, Debora, Campillo, Xavi Rubio, and Stride, Sebastian. 2014. “Introduction to Simulating the Past.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 21 (2): 251–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manfred, K., and Eggert, H.. 2001. Prähistorische Archäologie: Konzepte und Methoden. Tübingen and Basel: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Marassi, Massimo. 1998. Gadamer e l’ermeneutica contemporanea. Milan: Colonna Edizioni.Google Scholar
Marshall, Yvonne. 2002. “What Is Community Archaeology?” World Archaeology 34 (2): 211–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav, and Titunik, Irwin R.. 1977. Semiotics of Art: Prague School Contributions. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Matero, Frank G. 2006. “Making Archaeological Sites: Conservation as Interpretation of an Excavated Past.” In Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation, edited by Agnew, Neville and Bridgland, Janet, 55–63. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.Google Scholar
Matero, Frank G. 2008. “Heritage, Conservation, and Archaeology: An Introduction.” AIA Site Preservation Program. https://www.archaeological.org.pdfs/Matero.pdf (accessed on January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Mayer, Richard E., ed. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1991. One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McAnany, Patricia A., and Hodder, Ian. 2009. “Thinking about Stratigraphic Sequence in Social Terms.” Archaeological Dialogues 16 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1990. “The Critique of Impure Reason: Foucault and the Frankfurt School.” Political Theory 18 (3): 437–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Richard. 2013. “Referential Opacity and Hermeneutics in Plato’s Dialogue Form.” META: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 2: 251–278.Google Scholar
McGimsey, Charles R. 2003. “The Four Fields of Archaeology.” American Antiquity 68 (4): 611–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall, and Fiore, Quentin. 1967. The Medium Is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
McMahon, Augusta. 2013. “Space, Sound, and Light: Toward a Sensory Experience of Ancient Monumental Architecture.” American Journal of Archaeology 117 (1): 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, Paulette M., ed. 2000. Archaeological Displays and the Public: Museology and Interpretation. London: Archetype Publications.Google Scholar
Montella, Massimo. 2009. Valore e valorizzazione del patrimonio culturale storico. Milan: Electa per le Belle Arti.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 2008. The Boundaries of Babel: The Brain and the Enigma of Impossible Languages. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Stephanie. 2007. “On Disciplinary Culture: Archaeology as Fieldwork and Its Gendered Associations.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14 (3): 235–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mytum, Harold. 2003. “Artefact Biography as an Approach to Material Culture: Irish Gravestones as a Material Form of Genealogy.” The Journal of Irish Archaeology 12/13: 111–27.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Michael, and Lyman, R. Lee. 2002a. Seriation, Stratigraphy, and Index Fossils: The Backbone of Archaeological Dating. New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Michael, and Lyman, R. Lee. 2002b. “The Epistemological Nature of Archaeological Units.” Anthropological Theory 2 (1): 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, Laurent. 1999. “The Hochdorf ‘Princely’ Grave and the Question of the Nature of Archaeological Funerary Assemblages.” In Time and Archaeology, edited by Murray, Tim, 107–38. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Olsen, Bjørnar, Shanks, Michael, Webmoor, Timothy, and Witmore, Christopher. 2012. Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, J. Tim. 2001. “Causation and the Postmodern Critique of Objectivity.” Anthropological Theory 1 (1): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outram, Alan K. 2008. “Introduction to Experimental Archaeology.” World Archaeology 40 (1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overmann, Karenleigh A. 2016. “Beyond Writing: The Development of Literacy in the Ancient Near East.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 26: 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panneerselvam, S. 1999. “Myths as Discourse in The Structural Hermeneutics of Levi-Strauss.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1): 19–28.Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin. 1955. Meaning in the Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Patrik, Linda E. 1985. “Is There an Archaeological Record?” Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8: 27–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Mike, and Shanks, Michael. 2001. Theatre/Archaeology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1965–1967. Collected Papers. Edited by Hartshorne, Charles, Weiss, Paul, and Burks, Arthur W.. Vol. 8. Cambridge, M.A.: The Bellknap Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2014. “Kant’s Transcendental Arguments.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Fall 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/kant-transcendental/ (accessed January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Peterson, D. L., Popova, L. M., and Smith, A. T.. 2006. Beyond the Steppe and the Sown: Proceedings of the 2002 University of Chicago Conference on Eurasian Archaeology. Colloquia Pontica: Monograph Supplement of Ancient West and East 13. Leiden-Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piqueras-Fiszman, Betina, and Spence, Charles. 2012. “The Influence of the Color of the Cup on Consumers’ Perception of a Hot Beverage.” Journal of Sensory Studies 27 (5): 324–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . 1881. The Theaetetus. Translated by Kennedy, Benjamin Hall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Politis, Gustavo G., and Saunders, Nicholas J.. 2002. “Archaeological Correlates of Ideological Activity: Food Taboos and Spirit-Animals in an Amazonian Hunter-Gatherer Society.” In Consuming Passions and Patterns of Consumption, edited by Miracle, P.T. and Milner, N., 113–30. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. Nicholas. 1994. “Text and Figure in Ancient Mesopotamia: Match and Mismatch.” In The Ancient Mind, edited by Renfrew, Colin and Zubrow, Ezra B.W., 176–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Parker B. 1992. “Critical Archaeology: In the Ground and on the Street.” Historical Archaeology 26 (3): 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Barry B. 2009. Writing: Theory and History of the Technology of Civilization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Preziosi, Donald. 1979. The Semiotics of the Built Environment. Advances in Semiotics. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir. 1958. Morphology of the Folktale. Bloomington: Research Center, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Rathje, William L., Shanks, Michael, and Witmore, Christopher, eds. 2013. Archaeology in the Making: Conversations Through a Discipline. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Dwight. 1982. “Toward a Theory of Archaeological Classification.” In Essays on Archaeological Typology, edited by Whallon, Robert and Brown, James A., 56–91. Evanston, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
Read, Dwight. 2007. Artifact Classification: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1980. “The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: Archaeology as Anthropology?” American Journal of Archaeology 84 (3): 287–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1994. “Cognitive Archaeology.” In The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology, edited by Renfrew, Colin and Zubrow, Ezra B.W., 3–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 2007. Prehistory: The Making of the Human Mind. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin, and Zubrow, Ezra B.W., eds. 1994. The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Julian D. 2002. “Digital Preservation and Access.” European Journal of Archaeology 5 (3): 343–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Julian D. 2006. “Archaeology, E-Publication and the Semantic Web.” Antiquity 80 (310): 970–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodi, Frithjof. 2003. Das strukturierte Ganze: Studien zu den Werk von Wilhelm Dilthey. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Roosvelt, Christopher H., Cobb, Peter, Moss, Emanuel, Olson, Brandon R., and Ünlüsoy, Sinan. 2015. “Excavation Is [Destruction] Digitization: Advances in Archaeological Practice.” Journal of Field Archaeology 40: 325–46.Google Scholar
Roskams, Steve. 2001. Excavation. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, Irving. 1960. “The Classification of Artifacts in Archaeology.” American Antiquity 25 (3): 313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, Yorke M., and Baram, Uzi, eds. 2004. Marketing Heritage: Archaeology and the Consumption of the Past. London: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, John. 1961. “Stratigraphy and Seriation.” American Antiquity 26 (3): 324–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, Fred. 2004. The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2002. “Beyond Myth and Metaphor: Narrative in Digital Media.” Poetics Today 23 (4): 581–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabloff, Jeremy. 2005. “Processual Archaeology.” In Archaeology: The Key Concepts, edited by Renfrew, Colin and Bahn, Paul G., 159–64. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sackett, James R. 1977. “The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model.” American Antiquity 42: 369–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, Carl. 1978. Murmurs of Earth: The Voyager Interstellar Record. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1960. Critique de la raison dialectique. Paris: Librairie Gallimard.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and Skibo, James M.. 1997. “The Explanation of Artifact Variability.” American Antiquity 62: 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and Skibo, James M.. 2008. People and Things: A Behavioral Approach to Material Culture. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Schindler, David C. 2008. Plato’s Critique of Impure Reason: On Goodness and Truth in the Republic. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Schuyler, Robert L. 1971. “The History of American Archaeology: An Examination of Procedure.” American Antiquity 36 (4): 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackel, Paul A., and Chambers, Erve J., eds. 2004. Places in Mind: Public Archaeology as Applied Anthropology. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, Michael, and Tilley, Christopher. 1987. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, Michael, and Tilley, Christopher. 1992. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Kim Bartel. 2002. “Of Surfing, Searching, and Newshounds: A Typology of Internet Users’ Online Sessions.” Journal of Advertising Research 42 (5): 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, Michael. 2014. “Digitizing Archaeology: A Subtle Revolution in Analysis.” World Archaeology 46 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simandiraki-Grimshaw, Anna, and Stefanou, Eleni, eds. 2012. From Archaeology to Archaeologies: The “Other” Past. BAR International Series 2409. Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1913. Kant: Sechzehn Vorlesungen gehalten an der Berliner Universität. Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. 1977. “Archaeological Inference and Inductive Confirmation.” American Anthropologist 79 (3): 598–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael E. 2015. “How Can Archaeologists Make Better Arguments?” The SAA Archaeological Record September 2015: 18–23.Google Scholar
Snyder, Ilana, ed. 1998. Page to Screen: Taking Literacy Into the Electronic Era. London and New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. 2000. Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. 2008. Phenomenology of the Human Person. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1953. “Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types.” American Antiquity 18 (4): 305–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1982. “Structure in Archaeological Data: Nominal Variables.” In Essays on Archaeological Typology, edited by Whallon, Robert and Brown, James A., 1–20. Evanston, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
Starzmann, Maria Theresia, and Roby, John R., eds. 2016. Excavating Memory: Sites of Remembering and Forgetting. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steadman, Sharon R. 1996. “Recent Research in the Archaeology of Architecture: Beyond the Foundations.” Journal of Archaeological Research 4 (1): 51–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Edith. 1989. On the Problem of Empathy. Translated by Stein, Waltraut. 3rd ed. The Collected Works of Edith Stein 3. Washington, D.C.: ICS Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Peter G., and Planel, Philippe G., eds. 1999. The Constructed Past: Experimental Archaeology, Education and the Public. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stueber, Karsten. 2014. “Empathy.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Winter 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/empathy/ (accessed January 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Tani, Masakazu. 1995. “Beyond the Identification of Formation Processes: Behavioral Inference Based on Traces Left by Cultural Formation Processes.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2 (3): 231–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Allison Karmel. 2016. “The Sense-Scapes of Neo-Assyrian Capital Cities: Royal Authority and Bodily Experience.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 26: 243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, Christopher. 1990. Reading Material Culture: Structuralism, Hermeneutics and Post-Structuralism. Social Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tilley, Christopher. 1997. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Trebsche, Peter. 2009. “Does Form Follow Function? Towards a Methodical Interpretation of Archaeological Building Features.” World Archaeology 41 (3): 505–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigger, Bruce G. 1984. “Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist.” Man 19 (3): 355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1997. Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tyson, Lois. 2014. Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, Wilbur M. 1950. “Metaphysics and History.” The Review of Metaphysics 3: 263–99.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Ruth M. 2006. “Seeing the Past: Visual Media in Archaeology.” American Anthropologist 108 (2): 370–75.Google Scholar
van Reybrouck, David, and Jacobs, Dirk. 2006. “The Mutual Constitution of Natural and Social Identities during Archaeological Fieldwork.” In Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations, edited by Edgeworth, Matt, 33–44. London: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
Vidal, Jacques. 1989. Symboles et religions: Cours de l’année 1986–1987. Edited by Ries, Julien. Louvain-la-Neuve & Paris: Centre d’histoire des religion & Institut de science et de théologie des religions.Google Scholar
Vierra, Robert K. 1982. “Typology, Classification and Theory Building.” In Essays on Archaeological Typology, edited by Whallon, Robert and Brown, James A., 56–91. Evanston, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
Vila, Xurxo M. Ayán, Rotea, Rebeca Blanco, and Borrazás, Patricia Mañana, eds. 2003. Archaeotecture: Archaeology of Architecture. BAR International Series 1175. Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Cameron, and Carr, Neil, eds. 2013. Tourism and Archaeology: Sustainable Meeting Grounds. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Stanley, and Faust, Katherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, David. 2013. Foucault’s Archaeology: Science and Transformation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Whallon, Robert, and Brown, J.A., eds. 1982. Essays on Archaeological Typology. Evanston, Illinois: Center for American Archeology Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew T., and Edwards, Ben. 2015. Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wobst, Martin. 1977. “Stylistic Behavior and Information Exchange.” In For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, edited by Cleland, Charles E., 317–42. Anthropological Papers 61. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, Heinrich. 1915. Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Das Problem der Stilentwicklung in der neueren Kunst. Munich: Hugo Bruckmann.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 1985a. “Between Philosophy and Archaeology.” American Antiquity 50 (1): 478–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 1985b. “The Reaction against Analogy.” Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8: 63–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2002. Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, Thomas. 1989. The Evolution of Spatial Competence. Illinois Studies in Anthropology 17. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Wynn, Thomas, and Coolidge, Frederick L.. 2011. How To Think Like a Neandertal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yoffee, Norman, and Sherratt, Andrew. 1993. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? New Directions in Archaeology. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar