Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-qcsxw Total loading time: 0.468 Render date: 2022-08-15T08:26:41.235Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

7 - Negative politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Pierre Rosanvallon
Affiliation:
Collège de France, Paris
Arthur Goldhammer
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

The age of “deselection”

The most obvious mode of the new form of preventive power is electoral in nature. Contemporary elections are not so much choices of orientation as judgments on the past. The very meaning of elections has changed accordingly. The etymological sense – to choose among candidates – no longer applies; the contest has become one of elimination, or what one might call “deselection.” We have entered an era of “democracy by sanction.” Electoral competitions can no longer be understood simply as a confrontation between equal candidates. What we find most commonly today is the “disputed re-election.” Not enough attention has been paid to what amounts to a significant transformation of the democratic process. In political science, the change has been masked by an interest in “incumbent advantage,” which is admittedly an equally important phenomenon. Certain distinctive features of American politics have tended to focus attention on this phenomenon. In the United States the probability that an incumbent will be re-elected is extraordinarily high (currently close to 90 percent for the Senate and House of Representatives). What is more, this probability has increased over the past twenty years, despite rising rates of abstention and growing citizen disenchantment with government. Quite apart from this fact, however, disputed re-elections are also interesting in their own right. In the early days of democratic government, such situations were rare, for the simple reason that short mandates were originally considered an essential feature of the representative system in both Europe and the United States.

Type
Chapter
Information
Counter-Democracy
Politics in an Age of Distrust
, pp. 173 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Erickson, Stephen C., “The Entrenching of Incumbency: Reflections on the US House of Representatives, 1790–1994,” Cato Journal 14, no. 3 (Winter 1995)Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, Wildenmann, Rudolf, Boll, Berhard, and Römmele, Andrea, eds., The Victorious Incumbent: A Threat to Democracy (Dartmouth: Aldershot, 1994)
Cox, Gary W. and Morgenstern, Scott, “The Increasing Advantage of Incumbency in the U.S. States,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 18, no. 4 (Nov. 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriner, James L. and Senter, Thomas P., Against Long Odds: Citizens Who Challenge Congressional Incumbents (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999)Google Scholar
Campbell, Bruce A., Realignment in American Politics: Toward a Theory (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Martin, Pierre, Comprendre les évolutions électorale: La Théorie des réalignements revisitée (Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, 2000)Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris, The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independance (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, “Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage,” British Journal of Political Science 21, no. 1 (Jan. 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Ivengar, Shanto, Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarise the Electorate (New York: Free Press, 1995), p. 90Google Scholar
Pfau, Michael and Kenski, Henry C., Attack Politics Strategy and Defense (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1990)Google Scholar
Johnson-Cartee, Karen S. and Copeland, Gary A., Negative Political Advertising: Coming of Age (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991)Google Scholar
Kamber, Victor, Poison Politics: Are Negative Campaigns Destroying Democracy? (New York: Insight Books, 1997)Google Scholar
Jameson, Kathleen Hall, Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction and Democracy (Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Sonner, Brenda S., “The Effectiveness of Negative Political Advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research 38 (1998)Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (Princeton University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles M., Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power (Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George and Garrett, Geoffrey, “Agenda Setting, Vetoes and the European Union's Co-decision Procedure,” The Journal of Legislative Studies 3, no. 3 (Fall 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, Judith, “The Liberalism of Fear,” in Rosenblum, Nancy L., ed., Liberalism and the Moral Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael, The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror (Princeton University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul, Terror and Liberalism (New York: Norton, 2003)Google Scholar
Robin, Corey, Fear: The History of a Political Idea (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Schweisguth, Étienne, “La dépolitisation en question,” in Grunberg, Gérard, Meyer, Nonna, and Sniderman, Paul M., La Démocratie à L'épreuve (Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, 2002), esp. pp. 84–85Google Scholar
Missika, Jean-Louis, “Les Faux-semblants de la dépolitisation,” Le Débat no. 68 (Jan.–Feb. 1992)Google Scholar
Bouchet, Thomas, Legget, Matthew, Verdo, Geneviève, and Vigreux, Jean, eds., L'Insulte (en) politique: Europe et Amérique latine du XIXe à nos jours (Éditions Universitaires de Dijon, 2005)Google Scholar
Urfalino, Philippe, “La décision par consensus apparent. Nature et propriétés,” Revue européenne des sciences sociales (Winter 2006)Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark, “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology 78, no. 6 (May 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flauss, Jean-François, “L'élection tacite. Retour sur une vraie fausse curiosité du droit constitutionnel suisse,” Revue Française de droit constitutionnel, no. 61 (Jan. 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×