Adorno, T. 1973. Negative Dialectics. Trans. Ashton, E. B.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. 1974. Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. Trans. Jephcott, E.. London: New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. 1997. Aesthetic Theory. Trans. R. Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. 1998. Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. 2000. Problems of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. 2000. Introduction to Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Agassi, J.; Jarvie, I. C.; Laor, N. 1995. Critical Rationalism, the Social Sciences and the Humanities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Apel, Karl Otto. 1971. et al. eds. Hermeneutik und Ideoloiekritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. J.; Hughes, J. A.; Sharrock, W. W. 1986. Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Croom Helm: London and Sydney.Google Scholar

Ansell-Pearson, K. 1996. Nietzsche contra Rousseau: A Study of Nietzsche's Moral and Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aquinus, St. Thomas. 1981. Summa Theologica. Westminster: Christian Classics.Google Scholar

Aristotle 1853. The Organon. London: H. G. Bohn.

Aschheim, S. E. 1992. The Nietzsche Legacy in Germany, 1890–1990. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Augustine, St. Bishop of Hippo. 1995. De Doctrina Christiana. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Azevedo, J. 1997. Mapping Reality: an Evolutionary Realist Methodology for the Natural and Social Sciences. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Babette, B. E. and Cohen, R. S. 1999. Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge and Critical Theory.Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar

Babich, B. E.; Cohen, R. S. 1999. Nietzsche, Epistemology and Philosophy of ScienceDordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babich, B. E.; Bergoffen, D. B.; Glynn, S. 1995. Continental and Postmodern Perspectives in the Philosophy of Science. Avebury Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, B. 1974. Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Thinking. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Benn, S. I.; Mortimore, G. 1976. Rationality and the Social Sciences: Contributions to the Philosophy and Methodology of the Social Sciences. Routledge.Google Scholar

Benton, T.; Craib, I. 2001. Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought. Hampshire: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Berlin, I. 1976. Vico and HerderLondon: Hogarth.Google Scholar

Berlin, I. 1989. Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. 1992. The Fate of Art: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Betti, Emilio 1962. Die Hermeneutik als Allegmeine Methode der Geisteswissenschaften Tübigen: J.C.B. Mohr.

Bhaskar, R. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. (2nd edn.) Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar

Binswanger, L. 1963. Being-in-the-World. Selected Papers of Ludwig Binswanger. Trans. Needleman, J. New York, London: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bleicher, J. 1980. Contemporary Hermeneutics. Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Bleicher, J. 1982. The Hermeneutic Imagination: Outline of a Positive Critique of Scientism and Sociology. London: Boston and Henley.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. 1974. ‘Popper's Mystification of Objective Knowledge.’ Science Studies, IV, pp. 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Bohman, J. 1991. New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminacy.Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bottomore, T. 1974. Marxist Sociology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bruns, Gerald L. 1992. Hermeneutics, Ancient and Modern.New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bryant, C. 1985. Positivism in Social Theory and Research. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buck-Morss, S. 1977. The Origin of Negative Dialectics: Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin and the Frankfurt Institute. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Bultmann, R. 1955. Essays Philosophical and Theological. Trans. Greig J. C. G. London: SCM Press; New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bultmann, R. 1957. History and Eschatology: The Gifford Lectures, 1955. University Press, Edinburgh.

Bultmann, R. 1958. Jesus and the Word. New York, London: Scribner's.Google Scholar

Bultmann, R. 1958. Jesus Christ and Mythology. New York, London: Scribner's.Google Scholar

Bultmann, R. 1983. Theology of the New Testament.2 Vols. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

Bultmann, R. 1985. New Testament and Mythology and Other Basic Writings. Ed. Trans., Ogden, S. London: SCM Press.

Calvin, Jean. 1845. Institutes of the Christian Religion: A New Translation.Edinburgh: Calvin Translation Society.Google Scholar

Chladenius, J. M. 1985 (1710–1759). Allgemeine Geschichtswissenschaft. Einleitung, Friederich, C. Wien. Böhlau.

Chladenius, J. M. 1969. Einleitung zur richtigen Auslegung vernünftiger Reden und Schriften. Intr. Geldsetzer, L. Vol. 5. Series hermeneutica, Instrumenta Philosophica. Düsseldorf: Stern Verlag.Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T. 1942. Brutus and De Oratore. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. 1972. ‘Karl Marx’ and the Withering Away of Social Science' Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1,2 (Winter).

Cohen, G. A. 1978. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. B. 1993. The Natural and Social Sciences: Some Critical and Historical Perspectives. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Boston.Google Scholar

CohenR. S., ; Wartofsky, M. W. eds. 1983. Epistemology, Methodology, and the Social Sciences.Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copeland, Rita. 1991. Rhetoric, Hermeneutics and Translation in the Middle AgesCambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craib, I. 1992. Modern Social Theory: From Parsons to Habermas. Sussex: Harvester, Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Craib, I. 1997. Classical Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Critchley, S. 2001. Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction.Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dannhauser, K. 1630. The Idea of a Good Interpretation

Derrida, J. 1976. Trans. Spivak, G. C. Of Grammatology. London and Baltimore.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1914–1990. Gesammelte Schriften, 20 vols. Vols. 1–12, Suttgart: B. G. Teubner, and Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; vols. 13–20, Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1985–. Selected Works, 6 vols. Trans. Makkreel, R. A. and Rodi, F. PrincetonNJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1989. Introduction to the Human Sciences. Ed., Intro. Makkreel, R. A. and Rodi, F.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 2002. Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences. Ed., Intro. Makkreel, R. A. and Rodi, F.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Doyal, L. 1986. Empiricism, Explanation and Rationality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Doyal, L.; Harris, R. 1986. Empiricism, Explanation and Rationality: an Introduction to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dray, W. H. 1957. Laws and Explanation in History. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dray, W. H. 1959. “Explaining what is History.” In Theories of History. Gardiner, P. ed. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

Droysen, Johann Gustav. 1877. Geschichte Alexanders des Grossen. Berlin: R. V. Becker.Google Scholar

Droysen, Johann Gustav. 1897. Outline of the Principles of History. Trans. Andrews, E. B.Boston: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar

Droysen, Johann Gustav. 1917. Geschichte des Hellenismus.Gotha: Friederich Andreas Berthes.Google Scholar

Droysen, Johann Gustav 1977. Historik: Vorlesungen uber Enzyklopadie und Methodologie der Geschichte. Ed. Hubner, R. 8th. ed. Munich: R. Oldenbourg.

Dupre, J. 2003. Darwin's Legacy. What Evolution Means Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ebeling, G. 1959. “Hermeneutik.” Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart. 3rd ed.: 242–46.

Eden, Kathy. 1997. Hermeneutics and the Rhetorical Tradition: Chapters in the Ancient Legacy and its Humanist Reception. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ernesti, J. H. 1699. Compendium Hermeneutiae Profanae. Leipzig: np.Google Scholar

Fay, B. 1996. Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science: A Multicultural Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ferguson, D. S. 1986. Biblical Hermeneutics, London: SCM.

Feyerband, 1962. ‘Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism’ in Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. eds. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Flew, A. 1985. Thinking about Social Thinking: The Philosophy of the Social Sciences.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Forstman, J. 1977. A Romantic Triangle: Schleiermacher and Early German Romanticism. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1977. Language, Counter-memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. Bouchard, ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of The Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1985. The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality Volume 2. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Fuchs, E. 1959–65. Gesammelte Aufsätze. 3bd. Tubingen. 1959–65.

Gadamer, H. G. 1981. Reason in the Age of Science. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H. G. 1989. Truth and Method. Trans. Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall D. G. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar

Galvotti, M. C. 2003. Observation and experiment in the natural and social sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Gavroglu, K.; Stachel, J.; Wartofsky, M. W. 1995. Science, Politics and Social Practice: Essays on Marxism and Science, Philosophy of Culture and the Social SciencesDordrecht: Kluwer Acadmeic publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. 1993. Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Geuss, R. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Geuss, R. 1995. Cambridge Lecture Series on Hegel's Philosophy of History, unpublished.

Geuss, R. 1999. ‘Nietzsche and Genealogy’, in his Morality, Culture and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glassner, B.; Moreno, J. D. 1989. The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences.Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Glynn, S. 1986. European Philosophy and the Human and Social Sciences.Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. I. 1992. Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Golomb, J. 1997. Nietzsche and Jewish Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gordon, L. R. 1995. Fanon and the Crisis of European Man: An Essay on Philosophy and the Human Sciences. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gordon, S. 1991. The History and Philosophy of Social Science. London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Görland, I. 1996. Die Kant Kritik des Jungen Hegel. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1970. Towards a Rational Society. Trans. Shapiro, J. J. London: Heineman.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Trans. Shapiro, J. J. London: Heinemann. (Habermas, J. 1986 Erkenntnis und Interesse Frankfurt)

Habermas, J. 1974. Theory and Practice. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1976. Legitimation Crisis. Trans. McCarthy T. London: Heineman. (Habermas, J. 1973 Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus Frankfurt)

Habermas, J. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Trans. McCarthy T. London: Heineman. (Habermas, J. 1981 Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols. Frankfurt)

Habermas, J. 1982. Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere.Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Halfpenny, P. 1982. Positivism and Sociology. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Hardimon, M. O. 1994. Hegel's Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, R. ed. 1979. Rational Action: Studies in Philosophy and Social Science.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. 1952. The Counter-Revolution of Science. Indianapolis: Liberty.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. 1978. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1985. Introduction to Lectures on the Philosophy of History.Trans. T. M. Knox, and A.V. Miller, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1927. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. Trans. Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E. Oxford.

Heidegger, M. 2000. Introduction to Metaphysics. Trans. Fried, G., Polt, R. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Held, D. 1980. An Introduction to Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hindess, B. 1977. Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences.Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. D. 1976. The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. D. 1967. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hollis, M. 1994. The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hollis, M. 1996. Reason in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hollis, M.; Lukes, S. eds. 1982. Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hollis, N.; Nell, E. 1975. Rational Economic Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hookway, C.; Pettit, P. 1978. Action and Interpretation: Studies in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M. 1968a. Kritishhe Theorie: Eine Dokumentation. Schmidt, A. ed. 2 vols. Frankfurt: S. Fischer Verlag.

Horkheimer, M. 1968b. ‘Zum Rationalismusstreit in der gegenwärtigen Philosophie’ [The dispute over rationalism in contemporary philosophy], Kritische Theorie, vol. 1.

Horkheimer, M. 1972. ‘Art and Mass Culture’, in Critical Theory: Selected Essays, trans. Matthew J. O'Connell et al., New York: Herder and Herder.

Horkheimer, M. 1974. Critique of Instrumental Reason. Trans. O'Connell, M. J. et al., New York Seabury Press.

Horkheimer and Adorno. 1979. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. J. Cumming. London: Verso.

Hoy, D. (ed). 1986. Foucault: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hoy, D. 1985. ‘Jacques Derrida’ in The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences, Skinner, Q., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–65.

Humboldt, W. von, 1971. Linguistic Variability and Intellectual Development. Introduction to the Kawi Work. Trans. Buck, G. C. and Raven, F. A. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.

Humboldt, W. von, 1968. Gesammelte Schriften. Leitzmann, A. et al. Prussian Academy of the Sciences. 17 Vols. Berlin: B. Behr, 1903–1916. Rpt. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Husserl, E. 1950–. Husserliana – Gesammelte Werke. The Hague.

Husserl, E. 1954. Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. The Hague.

Husserl, E. 1970. The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenologytrans. Carr, D. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 2001. Logical Investigations. Trans. Findlay, J. N., ed. Moran, D. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Illich, I. 1993. In the Vineyard of the Text: A Commentary on Hugh's Didascalion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Ingarden, R. 1973. The Literary Work of Art. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Ingarden, R. 1975. On the Motives Which Led Husserl To Transcendental Idealism.Den Haag: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inwood, M. 1992. Hegel Dictionary. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irenaeus, St.; Bishop of Lyons. 1920. St. Irenaeus: The Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Jacoby, R. 1971. ‘Towards a Critique of Automatic Marxism: The Politics of Philsoophy Form from Lukacs to the Frankfurt School’. Telos, no. 10.

James, S. 1984. The Content of Social Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jameson, F. 1990. Late Marxism: Adorno or the Persistence of the Dialectic.London: Verso.Google Scholar

Jay, M. 1973. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Jay, M. 1984. Adorno. London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Jeanrond, Werner G. 1991. Theological Hermeneutics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joyce, P. 2002. The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences.London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1996. Kant's First Critique and the Transcendental Deduction.Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1997. Critique of Practical Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1977. ‘Was Ist Aufklärung?’ in Reiss, H. ed. Kant's Political Writings Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 54–60.

Keat, R.; Urry, J. 1982. Social Theory as Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Kockelmans, J. J. ed. 1967. Phenomenology. The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and its Interpretation. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books Doubleday.Google Scholar

Kolakowski, L. 1978. Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders, vol. 1.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kortian, G. 1980. Metacritique. The Philosophical Arguments of Jurgen Habermas.Trans. J. Raffan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Kukla, A. 2000. Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Social Science.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I.; Musgrave, A. eds. 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavrin, J. 1971. Nietzsche: A Biographical Introduction. London: Studio Vista.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1991. G. W. Leibniz's Monadology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lenin, V. I. 1972. ‘The Three Sources and Component Parts of Marxism’, in Marx, Engels, Lenin: Selected Works.

Lichtheim, G. 1961. Marxism: An Historical and Critical Study. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Lukacs, G. 1971. History and Class Consciousness. Trans. R. Livingston. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. 1991. Selected Readings from Martin Luther. Alton: Hunt and Thorpe.Google Scholar

Mack, M. 2003. German Idealism and the Jew: the Inner Anti-semitism of Philosophy and German Jewish Responses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Malthus, T. R. 1970. An Essay on the Principle of Population. The First Essay.Flew, A. ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Manicas, P. T. 1987. A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Marcuse, H. 1976. ‘On the Problem of the Dialectic’. Trans. Schoolman, M. and Smith, D. Telos, no. 27. Spring.

Martin, M.; McIntyre, L. C. 1994. Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1964. The German Ideology. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1970. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1971. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.Moscow: Progress Publishers; London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1977a. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, in McLellan, D. ed. Selected writings (1977). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Marx, K. 1977b. The Poverty of Philosophy in McLellan, D. ed. Selected writings (1977). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Marx, K. 1992. Communist Manifesto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McNiece, G. 1992. The Knowledge that Endures. Coleridge, German Philosophy and the Logic of Romantic Thought. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Meister, J. G. 1698. Dissertation on Interpretation. Leipzig: Bay Mafin Theodor Heyben.Google Scholar

Mendelson, J. 1979. “The Habermas Gadamer Debate”. New German Critique 18: 44–73.

Montaigne, Michel de. 1958. The Complete Works.London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar

Montaigne, Michel de. 2004. The Complete Essays. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Mueller, Vollmer, ed. 1985. The Hermeneutics Reader: Texts of the German Tradition from the Enlightenment to the Present. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Murray, M. ed. 1978. Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. 1985. Nietzsche: Life as Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1924. Will to Power. Trans. Ludovici, A. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1961. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Hollingdale, R. J. trans. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Nietzsche. F. 1979. Ecce Homo, trans. Hollingdale, R. J. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Nietzsche, F. 1990. Beyond Good and Evil. Trans. Hollingdale, R. J. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1993. The Birth of Tragedy. Trans. Whiteside, S. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1994. Genealogy of Morals.Ansell-Pearson, K. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (essay II).Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1997. Human, All to Human, in The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche, Vol. 3,1.Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1997. Untimely Meditations. Trans. Hollingdale, R. J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Connor, B. 2004. Adorno's Negative Dialectic: Philosophy and the Possibility of Critical Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Origen 1985. On First Principles. Trans. Butterworth. G. W. London: Peter Smith Publishers.

Outhwaite, W. 1987. New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory.London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owensby, J. 1994. Dilthey and the Narrative of History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, R. 1969. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, T.; Loubser, J. J. 1976. Explorations in General Theory in Social Science: Essays in Honour of Talcott Parsons, Vols. I & II. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, D. C. 1987. Philosophy, Science, A Social Inquiry: Contemporary Methodological Controversy. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Pippin, R. 1989. Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfaction of Self-Consciousness.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, T. M.; Ross, D. 2003. The Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Potter, G. 2000. The Philosophy of Social Science: New Perspectives. Harvard: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar

Pratt, V. 1978. The Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quintillian, 2001. The Orator's Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rabinow, P. ed. 1991. The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. 1976. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. 1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Trans. Thompson, J. B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ricoeur, P. 1984. Time and Narrative. Trans. McLaughlin, K. Pellauer, D. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. M. 1964. The New Hermeneutic. Robinson, J. M. and Cobb, J. B. ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Root, M. 1993. Philosophy of Social Science: The Methods, Ideals, and Politics of Social Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. 1982. Hegel's Dialectic and Its Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, A. 1988. Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, A. 2000. Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science, and Policy.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudner, R. S. 1966. Philosophy of Social Science. New York: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar

Runciman, W. G. 1969. Social Science and Political Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

Runciman, W. G. 1972. A Critique of Max Weber's Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ryan, A. 1970. The Philosophy of the Social Sciences.London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryle, G. 1990. ‘Knowing How and Knowing That’ in Collected Papers, Bristol: Thoemmes Antiquarian Books. pp. 212–225.

Safranski, R. 2002. Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography.London: Granta.Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Générale, ed. Bally, C. and Sechehaye, A. Paris: Lausame.

Saussure, F. de. 1983. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Harris R. London.

Sayer, D. 1979. Marx's Method. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, F. D. E. 1959. Hermeneutik. Kimmerle, H. ed. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, F. D. E. 1977. Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts by F.D.E. Schleiermacher. Trans. Kimmerle, H. ed., Duke, J. and Forstman J. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Scott, G. 1991. The History and Philosophy of Science. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sherratt, Y. 2002. Adorno's Positive Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shoemaker, P. J.; Tankard, J. W.; Lasorsa, D. 2004. How to Build Social Science Theories.London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Q. 1988. Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics.Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Soll, I. 1969. An Introduction to Hegel's Metaphysics. Chicago: Oxford University.Google Scholar

Solomon, R. 1983. In the Spirit of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Staiger, E. 1991. Basic Concepts of Poetics. Trans. Hudson, J. Frank, L. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Stretton, H. 1969. The Political Sciences: General Principles of Selection in Social Sciences and History. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 1985. ‘Foucault on Freedom and Truth’ in Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, D. 1979. Naturalism and Social Science: A Post-Empiricist Philosophy of Social Science.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. B. 1981. Cultural Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torrance, Thomas F. 1988. The Hermeneutics of John Calvin. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar

Trigg, R. 2001. Understanding Social Science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tudor, A. 1982. Beyond Empiricism: Philosophy of Science in Sociology.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Turner, S. P. 1986. The Search for a Methodology of Social Science: Durkheim, Weber, and the Nineteenth Century Problem of Cause, Probability and Action.Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uffenhimer, B. and Reventlow, H. G. 1988. Creative Biblical Exegesis: Christian and Jewish Hermeneutics through the Centuries. Tel Aviv: JSOT Press.Google Scholar

Vattimo, G. 2002. Nietzsche: An Introduction. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Vico. 1982. Selected Writings, ed. and trans. Pompa, L. Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press.

Wagner, P. 2001. A History and Theory of the Social Sciences: Not All That Is Solid Melts into Air.London: Sage.Google Scholar

Walsh, W. H. 1985. ‘The Origins of Hegelianism’ in Inwood, M. Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–30.

Warnke, G. 1987. Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

White, S. K. ed. 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Whitebook, J. 1995. Perversion and Utopia: A Study in Psychoanalysis and Critical Theory.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wiggershauss, R. 1994. The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories and Political Significance. Trans. Robertson, M. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Winch, P. 1958. The Idea of Social Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wisdom, J. O. 1993. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar

Wohlfart, G. 1981. Der Spekulative Satz: Bermerkungen zum Begriff der Speulation bei Hegel. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolff, C. 2003. Logic, or Rational Thoughts on the Powers of the Human Understanding. Trans. Wolfias, B. New York: Olms.Google ScholarPubMed

Worral, J. 1996. ‘Is the Idea of Scientific Explanation Unduly Anthropocentric?: The Lessons of the Anthropic Principle.’ LSE Centre for the Philosophy of the Natural and Social Sciences Discussion Paper Series. London: Tymes Court.

Wren, T. E.; Edelstein, W. 1990. The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion between Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, L. 2004. Artistic Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar