Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T02:19:37.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Confucian Public Reason and the Liberalism of Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Sungmoon Kim
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

As far as its constitution is concerned, Korea is a liberal-democratic country. However, while its “democratic” character has been firmly affirmed in recent years, its “liberal” character still remains ambiguous. Though there is notable dissatisfaction with the formal/procedural definition of democracy in terms of a free and regular election based on the principle of one person, one vote among Koreans (especially among the left who understand democracy in a more substantive sense), they believe democracy, for which they have shed blood, is irrevocable in Korea. At a minimum, there is wide consensus across the ideological spectrum that the June Uprising of 1987 is the landmark event that vividly separates the post-1987 regime from the previous ones, qualifying it to be democratic. But what is the parallel event for Korean liberalism? Was the June Uprising a “liberal-democratic” revolution? Or does democracy naturally refer to liberal democracy? If we grant that Korean democracy is a liberal democracy, what kind of liberalism does it imply?

For a long time, Koreans have equated democracy with liberal democracy, understanding liberalism in the Cold War context, namely, as the antithesis of the communism of the North. For them, democracy is what they had (and still have) to fight for because it is about power and the common and equal sharing of power (i.e., collective self-government or popular sovereignty) had long been suppressed by earlier authoritarian regimes. However, in the popular understanding, Korea has always been (even under the authoritarian reigns) a liberal country, meaning opposed to, and often threatened by, communism. In fact, for some, because of the threat of communism, or to safeguard liberalism, human rights, the core value of liberalism, had to be suppressed at times. In short, in Korea, liberalism was not so much what the people had to fight for internally as what they had to guard against in the face of the external threat of communist forces. This strong ideological understanding of liberalism still deeply permeates Korean society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Confucian Democracy in East Asia
Theory and Practice
, pp. 227 - 245
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kim, Sunhyuk, The Politics of Democratization in Korea: The Role of Civil Society (Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahm, Chaibong, “South Korea’s Miraculous Democracy,” Journal of Democracy 19 (2008), 128–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Jangjip, Minjuhaw ihuui Minjujuui [Democracy after Democratization] (Seoul: Humanitas, 2005)Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, The Open Society and Its Enemies (London: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A., The Constitution of Liberty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978)Google Scholar
Shils, Edward, The Virtue of Civility: Selected Essays on Liberalism, Tradition, and Civil Society, ed. Grosby, Steven (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1997)Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Liberal Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy (ed.), Freedom of Association (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Cho, Yong-whan, “The National Human Rights Commission: Law, Reality, and Its Future Task,” Korea Journal 42 (2002), 228–62Google Scholar
Yang, Hyunah, “Unfinished Tasks for Korean Family Policy in the 1990s: Maternity Protection Policy and Abolition of the Family-Head System,” Korea Journal 42 (2002), 68–99Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Belknap, [1971] 1999)Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles, Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty (New York: Penguin, 1974)Google Scholar
Kateb, George, The Inner Ocean: Individualism and Democratic Culture (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard E., Pluralism and Liberal Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Cho, Hein, “The Historical Origin of Civil Society in Korea,” Korea Journal 37 (1997), 24–41Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaibong, Yugyo, jabonjuui, minjujuui [Confucianism, Capitalism, and Democracy] (Seoul: Jeontong-gwa Hyeondae, 2000)Google Scholar
Chung, Yunjae (ed.), Yugyolideoshipgwa han’gukjeongchi [Confucian Leadership and Korean Politics] (Seoul: Baeksanseodang, 2002)Google Scholar
Choi, Jin-deok (ed.), Jeontongyegyowa shiminyunli [Traditional Rituals and Civic Ethics] (Seoul: Cheonggye, 2001)Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, “Philosophy and Democracy,” Political Theory 9 (1981), 370–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R., The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Linz, Juan L. and Stepan, Alfred, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose,” in Political Writings, ed. Reiss, Hans, trans. Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Tan, Kok-Chor, Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Andrew, Nationalism and Particularity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 191–224Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, World Poverty and Human Rights (Cambridge: Polity, 2002)Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, Globalizing Rawls (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph H., “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders,” in Theorizing Citizenship, ed. Beiner, Ronald (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Miller, David, Citizenship and National Identity (Cambridge: Polity, 2000), esp. 81–96Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, Democratic Education (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988), 289Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R., Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, 20th anniversary ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian, Democratic Justice (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S., The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash, “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders,” Political Theory 36 (2008), 37–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon, Hye-young, “Han’gukeoe banyeongdoen yugyomunhwajeok teukseong” [The Confucian Characteristics Reflected in Korean Language], in Han’gukmunhwawa han’gukin [Korean Culture and the Korean People], ed. the Association of International Korean Studies (Seoul: Sagyejeol, 1998), 235–58Google Scholar
Choi, Bong-yeong, Han’gukinui sahoejeok seonggyeok [The Social Character of the Korean People] (Seoul: Neutinamu, 1994), 108–13Google Scholar
Park, Chong-Min and Shin, Doh Chull, “Do Asian Values Deter Popular Support for Democracy in South Korea?,” Asian Survey 46 [2006], 341–61, 350)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Gi-wook, Ethnic Nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, Politics, and Legacy (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N. et al., Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Helgesen, Geir, Democracy and Authority in Korea: The Cultural Dimension in Korean Politics (Surrey: Curzon, 1998)Google Scholar
Kim, Bumsoo, “Minjujuuie isseo poyonggwa baeje” [How to Draw the Boundaries of Demos?], Korean Journal of International Relations 48 (2008), 173–98Google Scholar
Park, Goo-yong, “In’gwonui bopyeonjuuijeok jeongdanghawwa haemyeong” [The Universalist Justification of Human Rights], Society and Philosophy 7 (2004), 153–96Google Scholar
Alford, C. Fred, Think No Evil: Korean Values in the Age of Globalization (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994), 7Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul, “Moral Responsibility for Banal Evil,” Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (2006), 501–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahm, Chaibong, Talgeundaewa yugyo [Postmodernity and Confucianism] (Seoul: Nanam, 1998)Google Scholar
Okin, Susan M., Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton: Princeton University, 1999)Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, Identity in Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L., Membership and Morals: The Personal Uses of Pluralism in America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Galston, William A., The Practice of Liberal Pluralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Galston, William A., Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, “On the Tension between Sex Equality and Religious Freedom,” in Toward a Humanist Justice: The Political Philosophy of Susan Moller Okin, ed. Satz, Debra and Reich, Rob (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Galston, William A., “Two Concepts of Liberalism,” Ethics 105 (1995), 516–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×