Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T19:28:41.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 1 - Introductory Chapters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

Mark A. Ferrante
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Comprehensive Electromyography
With Clinical Correlations and Case Studies
, pp. 1 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bonner, FJ, DevlescHoward, AB. AAEM minimonograph #45: the early development of electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:825853.Google Scholar
Bullock, TH. Electroreception. In Springer handbook of auditory research, vol. 21. Bullock TH, Hopkins CD, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds): 2005:5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawking, S. A brief history of time. Toronto: Bantam Press, 1988:77.Google Scholar
Koumbourlis, AC. Electrical injuries. Crit Care Med 2002;30[suppl.]:S424S430.Google Scholar
Moller, P, Kramer, B. Review: electric fish. BioScience 1991;41:794796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, S. Particle physics for non-physicists: a tour of the microcosmos. Chantilly, VA: The Teaching Company, 2003.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Barry, ET. AAEM minimonograph #36: basic concepts of electricity and electronics in clinical electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:937946.Google Scholar
Gibilisco, S. Electricity demystified, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw Hill, 2012.Google Scholar
Kling, LB. Basic electricity. Piscataway, NJ: Research & Education Association, 2015.Google Scholar
Misulis, KE. Basic electronics for clinical neurophysiology. J Clin Neurophysiol 1989;6:4174.Google Scholar
Wolfson, R. Understanding modern electronics. Chantilly, VA: The Great Courses, 2014.Google Scholar

References

Bonner, FJ, DevlescHoward, AB. AAEM minimonograph #45: the early development of electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:825853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, WW. Essentials of electrodiagnostic medicine. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1999:22.Google Scholar
Matthews, BHC. Proceedings of the Physiological Society (December 1, 1934). J Physiol 1934;81(suppl):2829.Google Scholar
Robinson, LR, Christie, M, Nandedkar, S. A message from the ground electrode. Muscle Nerve 2016;54:10101011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Suggested Reading

Barry, DT. AAEM minimonograph #36: basic concepts of electricity and electronics in clinical electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:937946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitter, AJ, Stolov, WC. AAEM minimonograph #16: instrumentation and measurement in electrodiagnostic medicine—Part I. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:799811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitter, AJ, Stolov, WC. AAEM minimonograph #16: instrumentation and measurement in electrodiagnostic medicine—Part II. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:812824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccabee, PJ, Hassan, NF. AAEM minimonograph #39: digital filtering:basic concepts and application to evoked potentials. Muscle Nerve 1992;15:865875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bonner, FJ, DevlescHoward, AB. AAEM minimonography #45: the early development of electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:825853.Google Scholar
Brandstater, ME, Lambert, EH. Motor unit anatomy. Type and spatial arrangement of muscle fibers. In Desmedt, JE, editor, New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. Bassel: Karger, 1973:1422.Google Scholar
Brown, PB. The electrochemical basis of neuronal integration. In Haines, DE, editor, Fundamental neuroscience. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997:3149.Google Scholar
Brown, WF. The physiological and technical basis of electromyography. London: Butterworth, 1984:8.Google Scholar
Dodge, FA, Cooley, JW. Action potential of the motor neuron. IBM J Res Develop 1973;17:219229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, JC, Sherrington, CS. Numbers and contraction values of individual motor units examined in some muscles of the limb. Proc R Soc Biol 1930;106:326357.Google Scholar
Falck, B, Stalberg, E. Motor nerve conduction studies: measurement principles and interpretation of findings. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995;12:254279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinstein, B, Lindegaard, B, Nyman, E, Wohlfart, G. Morphologic studies of motor units in normal human muscles. Acta Anat 1955;23:127142.Google Scholar
Ferrante, MA, Wilbourn, AJ. The electrodiagnostic examination of peripheral nerve injuries. In Mackinnon, SE, editor, Nerve surgery. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 2015:5974.Google Scholar
Gasser, HS, Grundfest, H. Axon diameters in relation to spike dimensions and conduction velocity in mammalian fibers. Am J Physiol 1939;127:393414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gath, I, Stalberg, E. In situ measurement of the innervation ratio of motor units in human muscles. Exp Brain Res 1981;43:377382.Google Scholar
Gwathmey, KG. Sensory polyneuropathies. Continuum 2017;23:14111436.Google ScholarPubMed
Kugelberg, E. Properties of rat hindlimb motor units. In Desmedt, JE, editor, New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. Bassel: Karger, 1973:213.Google Scholar
Lloyd, DPC. Neuron patterns controlling transmission of ipsilateral hindlimb reflexes in cat. J Neurophysiol 1943;6:293315.Google Scholar
Lodish, H, Berk, A, Kaiser, CA, Krieger, M, Scott, MP, Bretscher, A, Ploegh, H, Matsudaira, P. Molecular cell biology, 6th ed. New York: WH Freeman and Co., 2007.Google Scholar
McComas, AJ. Invited review: motor unit estimation: methods, results, and present status. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:585597.Google Scholar
Rasminski, M, Sears, TA. Internodal conduction in undissected demyelinated nerve fibers. J Physiol 1971;22:323350.Google Scholar
Reles, A, Friede, RL. Axonal cytoskeleton at the nodes of Ranvier. J Neurocytol 1991;20:450458.Google Scholar
Rotshenker, S. Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. In Tubbs, RS, Rizk, E, Shoja, MM, Loukas, M, Barbaro, N, Spinner, RJ, editors, Nerves and nerve injuries. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015:611628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnepp, P, Schnepp, G. Faseranalytische untersuchung an peripherin nerven bei tieren vershciedenergrosse. Z Zellforsch 1971;119:99114.Google Scholar
Stalberg, E, Antoni, L. Electrophysiological cross section of the motor unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980;43:469474.Google Scholar
Stevens, JC, Lofgren, EP, Dyck, PJ. Histometric evaluation of branches of peroneal nerve: technique for combined biopsy of muscle nerve and cutaneous nerve. Brain Res 1973;52:3759.Google Scholar
Sunderland, S. Nerve and nerve injuries, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1978.Google Scholar
Sunderland, S. The anatomy and physiology of nerve injury. Muscle Nerve 1990;13:771784.Google Scholar
Sunderland, S, Bradley, KC. The cross-sectional area of peripheral nerve trunks devoted to nerve fibers. Brain 1949;72:3759.Google ScholarPubMed
Waxman, SG, Bennett, MV. Relative conduction velocities of small myelinated and unmyelinated fibres in the central nervous system. Nature 1972;238:217219.Google Scholar
Woodbury, JW. Action potential: properties of excitable membranes. In Ruch, TC, Patton, HD, editors, Neurophysiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1965:2672.Google Scholar

References

Aran, A, Segel, R, Kaneshige, K, Gulsuner, S, Renbaum, P, Oliphant, S, Meirson, T, Weinberg-Shukron, A, Hershkovitz, Y, Zeligson, S, Lee, MK, Samson, AO, Parsons, SM, King, M-C, Levy-Lahad, E, Walsh, T. Vesicular acetylcholine transporter defect underlies devastating congenital myasthenia syndrome. Neurology 2017;88:10211028.Google Scholar
Brown, WF. The physiological and technical basis of electromyography. London: Butterworth, 1984:372375.Google Scholar
Duchen, LW. An electron microscopic comparison of motor en-plates of slow and fast skeletal muscle fibers of the mouse. J Neurol Sci 1971;14:3745.Google Scholar
Engel, AG, Lambert, EH, Gomez, MR. A new myasthenic syndrome with end-plate acetylcholinesterase deficiency, small nerve terminals, and reduced acetylcholine release. Ann Neurol 1977;1:315330.Google Scholar
Fambrough, DM, Drachman, DC, Satyamurti, S. Neuromuscular junction in myasthenia gravis: decreased acetylcholine receptors. Science 1973;182:293295.Google Scholar
Hubbard, JI, Schmidt, RF. An electrophysiological investigation of mammalian motor nerve terminals. J Physiol 1963;166:145167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandel, ER, Schwartz, JH, Jessell, TM. Principles of neural science, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.Google Scholar
Katz, B, Miledi, R. The binding of acetylcholine to receptors and its removal from the synaptic cleft. J Physiol 1973;231:549574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keesey, JC. AAEE minimonograph #33: electrodiagnostic approach to defects of neuromuscular transmission. Muscle Nerve 1989;12:613626.Google Scholar
Kuno, M, Turkanis, SA, Weakly, JN. Correlation between nerve terminal size and transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol 1971;213:545556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sine, SM. End-plate acetylcholine receptor: structure, mechanism, pharmacology, and disease. Physiol Rev 2012;92:11891234.Google Scholar
Swanson, TH. Synaptic transmission. In Levin, KH, Luders, HO, editors, Comprehensive clinical neurophysiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2000:5768.Google Scholar
Witzemann, V. Development of the neuromuscular junction. Cell Tissue Res 2006;326:263271.Google Scholar

References

Adams, RD. Diseases of muscle: a study in pathology, 3rd ed. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row, 1975.Google Scholar
Amato, AA, Russell, JA. Neuromuscular disorders. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.Google Scholar
Bonner, FJ, DevlescHoward, AB. AAEM minimonography #45: the early development of electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:825853.Google Scholar
Brooke, MH, Kaiser, KK. Muscle fiber types: how many and what kind? Arch Neurol 1970;23:369379.Google Scholar
Brown, WF. The physiological and technical basis of electromyography. London: Butterworth, 1984.Google Scholar
Buchthal, F. The general concept of the motor unit. Publ Assoc Nerve Ment Dis 1961;38:2830.Google Scholar
Buchthal, F. Motor unit of mammalian muscle. Physiol Rev 1980;60:90142.Google Scholar
Burke, RE. Motor units in mammalian muscles. In Sumner, AJ, editor, The physiology of peripheral nerve disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company. 1980:133194.Google Scholar
Dubowitz, V, Sewry, CA, Oldfors, A. Muscle biopsy: a practical approach, 4th ed. London: WB Saunders, 2013.Google Scholar
Feinstein, B, Lindegard, B, Nyman, E, Wohlfart, G. Morphologic studies of motor units in normal human muscles. Acta Anat 1955;23:127142.Google Scholar
Galvani, L. De viribus electricitatis in motu musculari. Commentarius. De Bononiensi Scientiarum et Artium Instituto atque Academia Commentarii 1791;7:363418.Google Scholar
Ghez, C. The control of movement. In Kandel, ER, Schwartz, JH, Jessell, TM, editors, Principles of neural science, 3rd ed. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange 1991:533547.Google Scholar
Hunt, C. The reflex activity of mammalian small-nerve fibres. J Physiol 1951;115(4):456469.Google Scholar
Huxley, HE, Hanson, J. Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature 1954;173:973976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, AF, Niedergerke, R. Structural changes in muscle during contraction: interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature 1954;173:971973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, H, Mitsumoto, H. Muscle physiology and pathophysiology. In Levin, KH, Luders, HO, editors, Comprehensive clinical neurophysiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2000:8187.Google Scholar
Liddell, EGT, Sherrington, CS. Recruitment and some other factors of reflex inhibition. Proc R Soc B 1925;97:488518.Google Scholar
McComas, AJ, Fawcett, PRW, Campbell, LMJ, Sica, REP. Electrophysiological estimation of the number of motor units within a human muscle. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1971;34:121131.Google Scholar
Sherrington, CS. Remarks on some aspects of reflex inhibition. Proc R Soc B 1926;97:519547.Google Scholar
Sherrington, CS. Some functional problems attaching to convergence. Proc R Soc B 1929;105:332362.Google Scholar
Tarnopolsky, MA. Metabolic myopathies. Continuum 2016;22:18291851.Google ScholarPubMed
Wedell, G, Feinstein, B, Pattle, RE. The electrical activity of voluntary muscle in man under normal and pathological conditions. Brain 1944;67:178257.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×