Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T07:18:17.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Listening to the husband

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Paul J. Ford
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Denise M. Dudzinski
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Case narrative

An ethics consultation request with haunting features occurred at a Catholic hospital where I was on staff. I had collaborated with the chair of the medical-moral committee (as it was known at the time) and the hospital attorney (to whom I reported) to write my job description. My responsibilities included teaching, policy development, and availability for ethics consultations “in a manner similar to other medical consultations.” Whether consultations would be carried out by an individual consultant, a small group, or the full ethics committee was to be decided. But before my arrival the small number of ethics consultations had been heard by the entire committee.

The first ethics consultation request came about two months after I was hired. Sr.Adrienne, director of pastoral care, related that aCatholic priest on staff was concerned about Ms. Barnes, a middle-aged woman with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who was asking to be taken off ventilator support. The priest, Fr. Kelly, wanted to know: “How should we respond to requests to die in a Catholic hospital?” Sr. Adrienne was pleased to refer the question to me.

Several factors contributed to my discomfort with the ethics consult. I was new to the organization, and the position itself was new. Although I had years of teaching experience with healthcare professionals in a hospital setting, I had not been involved in ethics consultation itself. Given all this I felt a great sense of responsibility. I wanted to proceed cautiously and desired to attend to all details.

I recognized that ongoing contact with and guidance from the chair of the medical-moral committee and the hospital attorney were key.

Type
Chapter
Information
Complex Ethics Consultations
Cases that Haunt Us
, pp. 105 - 111
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×