Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T12:50:39.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7.2 - Nonprofit organizations in the Czech Republic

from 7 - Transformation countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Kateřina Ronovská
Affiliation:
Masaryk University
Klaus J. Hopt
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
Thomas Von Hippel
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The term “nonprofit organisations”

The legal order in the Czech Republic does not contain the legal definition of the “nonprofit organisation”, and this term has no specific legal meaning. In the common use, nonprofit organisations are subjects of private law existing for some purpose other than profit-making.

These entities have several characteristics. They are either person-based or property-based, are typically founded by means of a multi- or unilateral civil law act, exert activities for the public or mutual benefit, are separate from the state, have a voluntary nature and a certain organisational structure. Moreover, they are equipped with certain mechanisms enabling the control of their own activities, make use of a particular type of financing (including certain tax benefits) and often utilise the work of volunteers.

Their most important characteristic is the fact that they do not distribute their profit, but use it for public benefit or mutual benefit purposes.

Czech law is, technically, a part of the German legal family. It has developed from Austrian law, having been strongly influenced by Roman law and displaying many similarities to the traditional German legal conception.

This traditional conception was, however, significantly disrupted during the process of the so-called “socialist re-codification of private law”, carried out primarily in the 1960s. Under this process, civil law came closer to the Soviet doctrine and was fragmented into various branches of law regulated by an immense number of laws.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×