Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T03:19:43.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The primary health care movement and the political ideology of participation in health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

Lynn M. Morgan
Affiliation:
Mount Holyoke College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Every so often an innovative new health strategy promises to revolutionize the world's health profile. So it was with the primary health care (PHC) movement of the 1970s. PHC became famous following the Alma Ata Conference sponsored by the World Health Organization and UNICEF in the Soviet Union in 1977, where conferees coined the nowfamous slogan, “Health for all by the year 2000.” The PHC strategy was based on the realization that health problems exacting the highest toll on Third World peoples could be alleviated with relatively simple health and sanitary measures, assuming that dispersed rural populations could be given access to such services. (The U.S. Agency for International Development estimated that less than 20 percent of people in developing countries had access to basic health services in 1980 [AID 1980: 10].) Two components of the PHC strategy were designed to meet these needs: (1) extending basic health services (such as immunization, sanitation, family planning, and nutritional surveillance) to underserved areas of less-developed countries; and (2) using community participation to improve health.

The primary health care strategy was indeed an improvement over medical models then prevailing in the developing world. Earlier initiatives emphasized costly, urban, hospital-based, curative services while PHC emphasized rural, community-based, low-cost, preventative services to be provided by village health workers, paraprofessional health assistants, or nursing auxiliaries. Primary health programs provided the impetus for many Third World governments to expand their health infrastructures, building rural health posts and secondary care clinics throughout the countryside.

Type
Chapter
Information
Community Participation in Health
The Politics of Primary Care in Costa Rica
, pp. 62 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×