Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T10:43:54.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - “Sharing Power without Losing Control”: Reform Apartheid and the New Politics of Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

Robert B. Horwitz
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

Parastatal reform was part of the government's broader project to modify the apartheid system. Apartheid may have been a multifaceted, systemic method of political oppression along racial lines, but, at bottom and in origin, it was a system for the control of labor. “Reform apartheid”, inaugurated by P. W. Botha's verligte faction of the National Party, represented the recognition that that system of control had become dysfunctional, that many of the structures guaranteeing white privilege were now incompatible with the demands of a modern economy. Reform apartheid comprised a contradictory set of strategies: the improvement of the basic conditions of black life but the lessening of state intervention in the economy; devolution of political power to local areas but maintainence of the prohibition against African participation in national political life. With respect to the parastatals, reform apartheid resulted in both their expansion and the attempt to privatize them. Reform apartheid's aim was to end formal apartheid but reconsolidate white supremacy through the market and a restricted political franchise. This propelled, in classic dialectical fashion, the emergence of a broad, coherent internal opposition movement against the government's top–down reforms. The violent conflict over the reform of apartheid in the 1980s set the stage for February 1990 and structured the political struggles over the parastatals in the democratic transition period. In the activist anti-apartheid civil society organizations lay the groundwork for the political culture of consultation and transparency characteristic of the post–February 1990 democratic transition period.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×