Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:58:39.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - It Depends on Your Point of View: Implications of Perspective-Taking and National Identification for Dutch Collective Guilt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Sven Zebel
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Bertjan Doosje
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Russell Spears
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Nyla R. Branscombe
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bertjan Doosje
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

In common with the current reappraisal of history in Western colonial countries, several negative episodes in the history of the Netherlands have come to temper the generally favorable portrayal of the Dutch in their own history books (Emmer, 2000). These episodes concern the exploitation or mistreatment of social groups whose descendants and survivors are part of the Dutch community today. For example, Jewish survivors of World War II in the Netherlands have received an apology and financial compensation for the rather grudging and gradual manner in which their properties were returned and their rights were restored (“Kok,” 2000). Another example is the recent discussion about how to deal with slavery participation by the Dutch in Surinam and the Netherlands Antilles in the Caribbean, which is an historical period that has received little attention in the Netherlands after slavery was abolished in 1863. The neglect of this historical period is especially painful for the Surinamese and Antillean people in the Netherlands because, as a result, their ancestors' history is relatively unknown by most Dutch people today (Bogaerts & Moors, 2001). Now that the historical relation of the Dutch to these social groups has been publicized, the question arises whether the Dutch today feel guilty about the past mistreatment and exploitation of these groups.

In answering this question, Dutch people seem to focus on a range of different aspects of these negative historical episodes in Dutch history.

Type
Chapter
Information
Collective Guilt
International Perspectives
, pp. 148 - 168
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York: W. W. Norton
Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., & Hastings, S. (1997). Distortions of collective memory: How groups flatter and deceive themselves. In J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rimé (Eds.), Collective memory and political events: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 277–93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaerts, T., & Moors, H. (2001). Het verleden onder ogen. Gesprek met Gert Oostindie [Confronting the past. Interview with Gert Oostindie]. Tijdschrift van de vereniging van docenten in geschiedenis en staatsinrichting in Nederland (VGN), 42 (5), 4–8Google Scholar
Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity, context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford: Blackwell
Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three football field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doosje, B., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmer, P. C. (2000). Nederland en de slavenhandel. Vergeten of herinneren? [The Netherlands and the slave trade: To forget or to remember?]. In De Nederlandse slavenhandel. 1500–1850 (pp. 17–21). Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press
Kok biedt joden alsnog excuses aan [Prime minister Kok apologizes to Jews after all]. (2000, January 29). De Volkskrant, p. 1
Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Empathy, shame, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. Journal of Personality, 66, 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, K. M. (1987). Guilt following transgression: An attribution of responsibility approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 247–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, B. (1998). Slachtoffers en overlevenden: De nazi-vervolging van de joden in Nederland 1940–1945 [Victims and survivors: The Nazi persecution of the Jews in the Netherlands 1940–1945]. Amsterdam: Bakker
Roseman, I., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1999). Commitment and the context of social perception. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 59–83). Oxford: Blackwell
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall
Tangney, J. P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.). Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 115–39). New York: Guilford Press
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell
Zebel, S., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2002a). Which point of view is favored? The role of outgroup perspective-taking and national group identification in group-based guilt. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam
Zebel, S., Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Vliek, M. (2002b). When it comes too close: Group-based guilt as a consequence of standing in the shoes of the perpetrators. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×