Adolphs, R., and Tranel, D. (2000). Emotion recognition and the human amygdala. In Aggleton, J. P. (ed.), The Amygdala: A Functional Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., and Damasio, A. (1994). Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature, 372, 669–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anderson, J. A. (2003). McCulloch-Pitts neurons. In Nadel, L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. New York: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., and Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 4, 1036–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., Chiavarino, C., and Humphreys, G. W. (2004). Frontal and temporo-parietal lobe contributions to theory of mind: Neuropsychological evidence from a false-belief task with reduced language and executive demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1773–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., and Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Domain-specificity and theory of mind: Evaluating neuropsychological evidence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 572–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arbib, M. A. (1987). Brains, Machines, and Mathematics. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbib, M. A. (2003). The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Arkin, R. C. (1998). Behavior-Based Robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baddeley, A. (2007). Working Memory, Thought, and Action. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., and Hitch, G. J. L. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. A. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances and Research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Baillargeon, R. (1986). Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants. Cognition, 23, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3- and 4-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 655–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandettini, P. A., and Ungerleider, L. G. (2001). From neuron to BOLD: New connections. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 864–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). The empathizing system: A revision of the 1994 model of the mindreading system. In Ellis, B. and Bjorklund, D. (eds.), Origins of the Social Mind. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., and Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?Cognition, 21, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., and Cohen, D. J. (eds.) (2000). Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bassett, D. S., and Bullmore, E. (2006). Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist, 12, 512–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bechtel, W. (1999). Unity of science. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia Of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W., Mandik, P., Mundale, J., and Stufflebeam, R. S. (eds.) (2001). Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W., and Abrahamsen, A. A. (2002). Connectionism and the Mind: Parallel Processing, Dynamics and Evolution in Networks. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bermúdez, J. L. (2005). Philosophy of Psychology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bermúdez, J. L. (ed.) (2006). Philosophy of Psychology: Contemporary Readings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Block, N. (ed.) (1981). Imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Block, N. (1995). The mind as the software of the brain. In Osherson, D., Gleitman, L., Kosslyn, S. M., Smith, E., and Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bloom, P., and German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77, B25–B31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boden, M. A. (1990a). Escaping from the Chinese room. In The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boden, M. A. (ed). (1990b). The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Boden, M. A. (2006). Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Boucher, J. (1996). What could possibly cause autism? In Carruthers, P. and Smith, P. K. (eds.), Theories of Theory of Mind. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brachman, R. J., and Levesque, H. J. (eds.) (1985). Readings in Knowledge Representation. Los Altos, CA: M. Kaufmann.

Bremner, G. J. (1994). Infancy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bressler, S. L., Tang, W., Sylvester, C. M., Shulman, G. L., and Corbetta, M. (2008). Top-down control of human visual cortex by frontal and parietal cortex in anticipatory visual spatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10056–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Broadbent, D. E. (1954). The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 191–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brook, A. (2007). The Prehistory of Cognitive Science. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, R. Reprinted in J. Haugeland (ed.) (1997), Mind Design II: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, R. (1999). Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. (2006). The Architecture of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, P. (2008a). On Fodor-fixation, flexibility, and human uniqueness: A reply to Cowie, Machery, and Wilson. Mind and Language, 23, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, P. (2008b). Precis of The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought. Mind and Language, 23, 257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, P., and Smith, P. K. (eds.) (1996). Theories of Theory of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Chelazzi, L., and Corbetta, M. (2000). Cortical mechanisms of visuospatial attention in the primate brain. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences (2nd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christiansen, M. H., and Chater, N. (2001). Connectionist Psycholinguistics. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google ScholarPubMed

Churchland, P. M. (1990a). On the nature of theories: A neurocomputational perspective. In A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. M. (1990b). Cognitive activity in artificial neural networks. In Block, N. and Osherson, D. (eds.), Invitation to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted in Cummins, R. and Cummins, D. D. (2000), Minds, Brains, and Computers: The Foundations of Cognitive Science: An Anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. M. (2007). Neurophilosophy at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. S., and Sejnowski, T. J. (1992). The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (1989). Microcognition: Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (1993). Associative Engines: Connectionism, Concepts, and Representational Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (1998). Time and mind. Journal of Philosophy, 95, 354–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, L. A., and Shepard, R. N. (1973). The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Memory and Cognition, 1, 246–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copeland, J. G. (1993). Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Corkin, S. (2002). What's new with the amnesic patient H.M.?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 153–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Berkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain-specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In Hirschfeld, L. A. and Gelman, S. F. (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted inBermúdez, J. L. (ed.) (2006), Philosophy of Psychology: Contemporary Readings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cowie, F. (2008). Us, them and it: Modules, genes, environments and evolution. Mind and Language, 23, 284–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, T. (2003). The Mechanical Mind: A Philosophical Introduction to Minds, Machines, and Mental Representation. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummins, R. (2000). “How does it work?” versus “What are the laws?” In Keil, F. C. and Wilson, R. A. (eds.), Explanation and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cummins, R., and Cummins, D. D. (2000). Minds, Brains, and Computers: The Foundations of Cognitive Science: An Anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cutland, N. J. (1980). Computability: An Introduction to Recursive Function Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, M., and Stone, T. (eds.) (1995a). Folk Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.

Davies, M., and Stone, T. (eds.) (1995b). Mental Simulation. Oxford: Blackwell.

Davis, M. (2000). The Universal Computer: The Road from Leibniz to Turing. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Davis, M. (2001). Engines of Logic: Mathematicians and the Origin of the Computer. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Davis, S. (1993). Connectionism: Theory and Practice. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1979). Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 51, 184–200.Google Scholar

Dawson, M. R. W. (1998). Understanding Cognitive Science. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dawson, M. R. W. (2004). Minds and Machines: Connectionism and Psychological Modeling. Oxford:Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, M. R. W. (2005). Connectionism: A Hands-On Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, D. (1984). Cognitive wheels: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. In Hookway, C. (ed.), Minds, Machines, and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (1977). Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Eliasmith, C. (1996). The third contender: A critical exmination of the dynamicist theory of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 9, 441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, M. H. (1928). The effect of change or reward on the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 19–30.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., and Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Evans, J. S. B. T., and Over, D. (2004). If. Oxford:Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felleman, D. J., and Essen, D. C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flanagan, O. J. (1991). The Science of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1985). Precis of The Modularity of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. (1987). Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (2000). The Mind Doesn't Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J., and Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Franklin, S. (1995). Artificial Minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Friedenberg, J., and Silverman, G. (2006). Cognitive Science : An Introduction to the Study of Mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Funt, B. V. (1980). Problem-solving with diagrammatic representations. Artificial Intelligence, 13, 201–30. Reprinted in Brachman, R. J. and Levesque, H. J. (eds.) (1985), Readings in Knowledge Representation. Los Altos, CA: M. Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1985). The Mind's New Science : A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.) (1995). The New Cognitive Neurosciences (1st edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.) (2000). The New Cognitive Neurosciences (2nd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.) (2004). The New Cognitive Neurosciences (3rd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., and Mangun, G. R. (2008). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Gleitman, H., Fridlund, A. J., and Reisberg, D. (2004). Psychology. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating Minds. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gopnik, A., and Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, Thoughts, and Theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind and Language, 1, 158–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorman, R. P., and Sejnowski, T. J. (1988). Analysis of hidden units in a layered network trained to identify sonar targets. Neural Networks, 1, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grainger, J., and Jacobs, A. M. (1998). Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Griggs, R. A., and Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic materials effect in the Wason selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadley, R. F. (2000). Cognition and the computational power of connectionist networks. Connection Science, 12, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol-grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Haugeland, J. (1997). Mind Design II : Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Heal, J. (1986) Replication and functionalism. In Butterfield, J. (ed.), Language, Mind and Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Heeger, D. J., and Ress, D. (2002). What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 142–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heil, J. (2004). Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Henson, R. (2006). Forward inference using functional neuroimaging: Dissociations versus associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 64–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., and Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. and the PDP Research Group, (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of Cognition, vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hirschfeld, L. A., and Gelman, S. F. (eds.) (1994). Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Hopfinger, J. B., Luck, S. J., and Hillyard, S. A. (2004). Selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuromagnetic studies. In Gazzaniga, M. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (3rd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Houghton, G. (2005). Connectionist Models in Cognitive Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Humphreys, G. W., Duncan, J., and Treisman, A. (eds.) (1999). Attention, Space, and Action: Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Iacoboni, M., and Dapretto, M. (2006). The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 942–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jackson, P. (1998). Introduction to Expert Systems. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Jacob, P., and Jeannerod, M. (2003). Ways of Seeing: The Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jirsa, V. K., and McIntosh, A. R. (eds.) (2007). The Handbook of Brain Connectivity. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Johnson, K. (2004). Gold's theorem and cognitive science. Philosophy of Science, 71, 571–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). Computer and the Mind : An Introduction to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, J., and Roth, D. (2003). Robot Programming: A Practical Guide to Behavior-Based Robotics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Kalat, J. W. (2001). Introduction to Psychology. Belmont, CA; London: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Kandel, E. R., Schwarz, J. H., and Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of Neural Science. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical.Google Scholar

Kelly, W. M., Macrae, C. N., Wyland, C. L., Caglar, S., Inati, S., and Heatherton, T. F. (2002). Finding the self? An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 785–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kosslyn, S. M. (1973). Scanning visual images: Some structural implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., and Ganis, G. (2006). The Case for Mental Imagery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In Jeffress, A. L. (ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior: The Hixon Symposium. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lebiere, C. (2003). ACT. In Nadel, L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. New York: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94, 412–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leslie, A. M., Friedman, O., and German, T. P. (2004). Core mechanisms in “theory of mind.”Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 529–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leslie, A.M., German, T. P., and Polizzi, P. (2005). Belief–desire reasoning as a process of selection. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 45–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leslie, A. M., and Polizzi, P. (1998). Inhibitory processing in the false belief task: Two conjectures. Developmental Science, 1, 247–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Logothetis, N. K. (2001). The underpinnings of the BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3963–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453, 869–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., and Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412, 150–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lovett, M. C., and Anderson, J. R. (2005). Thinking as a production system. In Holyoak, K. J. and Morrison, R. G. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luck, S. J. (2005). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Luck, S. J., and Ford, M. A. (1998). On the role of selective attention in visual perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 825–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Luria, A. R. (1970). The functional organization of the brain. Scientific American, 222, 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macdonald, C., and Macdonald, G. (1995). Connectionism. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Machery, E. (2008). Massive modularity and the flexibility of human cognition. Mind and Language, 23, 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, G. (2003). The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Marcus, G., Ullman, M., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J., and Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in Language Acquisition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Mareschal, D., and Johnson, S. P. (2002). Learning to perceive object unity: A connectionist account. Developmental Science, 5, 151–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mareschal, D., Plunkett, K., and Harris, P. (1995). Developing object permanence: A connectionist model. In Moore, J. D. and Lehman, J. F. (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Marr, D., and Hilldreth, E. (1980). Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 204, 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matarić, M. (1997). Behavior-based control: Examples from navigation, learning, and group behavior. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 9, 323–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matarić, M. (1998). Behavior-based robotics as a tool for synthesis of artificial behavior and analysis of natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 82–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matarić, M. (2007). The Robotics Primer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L., and Jenkins, E. (1991). Nature, nurture, and connectionism: Implications for connectionist models of development. In Lehn, K. (ed.), Architectures for Intelligence: The 22nd (1988) Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L., and Patterson, K. (2002). Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 465–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McClelland, J. L, Rumelhart, D. E., and Group, the PDP Research (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of Cognition, vol. 2: Psychological and Biological Models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McCulloch, W. S., and Pitts, W. H. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLeod, P., Plunkett, K., and Rolls, E. T. (1998). Introduction to the Connectionist Modelling of Cognitive Processes. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Medsker, L. R., and Schulte, T. W. (2003). Expert systems. In Nadel, L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (vol. 2). New York: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Michalski, R. S., and Chilausky, R. L. (1980). Learning by being told and learning from examples: An experimental comparison of the two methods for knowledge acquisition in the context of developing an expert system for soybean disease diagnosis. International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems, 4, 125–61.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 141–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Milner, A. D., and Goodale, M. A. (2006). The Visual Brain in Action (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, B. (1966). Amnesia following operation on the temporal lobes. In Whitty, C. W. M. and Zangwill, O. L. (eds.), Amnesia. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar

Minsky, M., and Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mishkin, M. L., Ungerleider, G., and Macko, K. A. (1983/2001). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in NeuroSciences, 6, 414–17. Reprinted in W. Bechtel, P. Mandik, Mundale, J., and Stufflebeam, R. (eds.) (2001), Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, J. P., Banaji, M. R., and Macrae, C. N. (2005). The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1306–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine Learning. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Mukamel, R., Gelbard, H., Arieli, A., Hasson, U., Fried, I., and Malach, R. (2005). Coupling between neuronal firing, field potentials, and fMRI in human auditory cortex. Science, 309, 951–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Munakata, Y. (2001). Graded representations in behavioral dissociations. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 309–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Munakata, Y., and McClelland, J. L. (2003). Connectionist models of development. Developmental Science, 6, 413–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munakata, Y., McClelland, J. L., Johnson, M. H., and Siegler, R. S. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review, 104, 686–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Newmeyer, F. J. (1986). Linguistic Theory in America. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, S., Stich, S., Leslie, A., and Klein, D. (1996). Varieties of off-line simulation. In Carruthers, P. and Smith, P. K. (eds.), Theories of Theory of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nilsson, N. J. (1984). Shakey the robot. SRI International, Technical Note 323.

O'Grady, W., Archibald, J., Aronoff, M., and Rees-Miller, J. (2005). Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction (5th edn.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.Google Scholar

Oaksford, M., and Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orban, G. A., Essen, D., and Vanduffel, W. (2004). Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 315–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O'Reilly, R. C., and Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational Explorations in Computational Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Page, M. (2000). Connectionist modeling in psychology: A localist manifesto. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 443–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the Representational Mind (new edn. 1993). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Perner, J., and Leekam, S. (2008). The curious incident of the photo that was accused of being false: Issues of domain specificity in development, autism, and brain imaging. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 76–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Petersen, S. E., and Fiez, J. A. (2001). The processing of single words studied with positron emission tomography. In Bechtel, W., P. Mandik, J. Mundale, and R. S. Stufflebeam (eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., and Mintun, M. (1988). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature, 331, 585–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pfeifer, R., Iida, F., and Gómez, G. (2006). Morphological computation for adaptive behavior and cognition. International Congress Series, 1291, 22–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, M. L., Young, A. W., Senior, C., et al. (1997). A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature, 389, 495–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piccinini, G. (2004). The first computational theory of mind and brain: A close look at McCulloch and Pitt's “Logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity.”Synthese, 141, 175–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2005). So how does the mind work?Mind and Language, 20, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S., and Prince, A. (1988a). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pinker, S., and Prince, A. (1988b). Rules and connections in human language. In Morris, R. (ed.), Parallel Distributed Processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Pinker, S., and Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plaut, D. C., Banich, M. T., and Mack, M. (2003). Connectionist modeling of language: Examples and implications. In Banich, M. T. and Mack, M. (eds.), Mind, Brain, and Language: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Plotnik, R. (2005). Introduction to Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.Google Scholar

Plunkett, K., and Elman, J. L. (1997). Exercises in Rethinking Innateness: A Handbook for Connectionist Simulations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Plunkett, K., and Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pollard, P., and Evans, J. St. B. T. (1987). Content and context effects in reasoning. American Journal of Psychology, 100, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Port, R. F., and Gelder, T. (1995). Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Posner, M. I. (1989). Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Posner, M. I. (ed.) (2004). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Posner, M. I., and Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of Mind. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar

Prince, A., and Pinker, S. (1988). Rules and connections in human language. Trends in Neurosciences, 11, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pylyshyn, Z. (1980). Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 111–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. (ed.) (1987). The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Raichle, M. E., and Mintun, M. A. (2006). Brain work and brain imaging. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 449–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ramnani, N., Behrens, T. E. J., Penny, W., and Matthews, P. M. (2004). New approaches for exploring functional and anatomical connectivity in the human brain. Biological Psychiatry, 56, 613–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ramsey, W., Stich, S. P., and Rumelhart, D. E. (1991). Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Rees, G., Friston, K., and Koch, C. (2000). A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 716–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ritter, F. E. (2003). Soar. In Nadel, L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. New York: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., and Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., and Gallese, V. (2006). Mirrors of the mind. Scientific American, 295, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rizzolatti, G., and Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions and Emotions. Trans. F. Anderson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Robbins, R., and Aydede, M. (eds.) (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Roediger, H. L., Dudai, Y., and Fitzpatrick, S. M. (2007). Science of Memory: Concepts. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, R. (1971). Mathematical Logic and Formalized Theories. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Rogers, T. T., and McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rohde, D., and Plaut, D. C. (1999). Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: How important is starting small?Cognition, 72, 67–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rollins, M. (1989). Mental Imagery: The Limits of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rolls, E. T., and Milward, ., T. (2000). A model of invariant object recognition in the visual system: Learning rules, activation functions, lateral inhibition, and information-based performance measures. Neural Computation, 12, 2547–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65, 386–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowe, J. B., and Frackowiak, R. S. J. (2003). Neuroimaging. In Nadel, L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. New York: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Rumelhart, D. E. (1989). The architecture of mind: A connectionist approach. In Posner, M. I. (ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted in Haugeland, J. (ed.) (1997), Mind Design II: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rumelhart, D. E., and McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., and The PDP Research Group (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of Cognition, vol. 2: Psychological and Biological Models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., and ,The PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of Cognition, vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. For vol. 2, see McClelland et al. (1986).Google Scholar

Russell, S. J., and Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2nd edn.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Russell, S. J., and Norvig, P. (2009). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd edn.). New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.Google Scholar

Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Chiavarino, C., and Humphreys, G. W. (2004). Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 499–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Kathirgamanathan, U., and Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Seeing it my way: A case of a selective deficit in inhibiting self-perspective. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 128, 1102–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saxe, R., Carey, S., and Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saxe, R., and Kanwisher, N. (2005). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “Theory of Mind.” In Cacioppo, J. T. and Berntson, G. G. (eds.), Social Neuroscience: Key Readings. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. (2004). Mind: A Brief Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shadmehr, R., and Krakauer, J. W. (2008). A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 359–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shallice, T., and Warrington, E. K. (1970). Independent functioning of memory stores: A neuropsychological study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 261–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shanahan, M. P. (2003). The frame problem. In Nadel, L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. New York: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 and 623–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, R. N., and Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shepherd, G. (1994). Neurobiology (3rd edn.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Siegelmann, H., and Sontag, E. (1991). Turing computability with neural nets. Applied Mathematics Letters, 4, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sloman, A. (1999). Cognitive architecture. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. C. (eds.), TheMIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Smith, L., and Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamical system. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 343–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spelke, E. S. (1988). The origins of physical knowledge. In Weiskrantz, L. (ed.), Thought without Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Spelke, E. S., Gutheil, G., Walle, G., Kosslyn, S. M., and Osherson, D. N. (1995). The development of object perception. In Kosslyn, S. M. and Osherson, D. N. (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science, vol. 2: Visual Cognition (2nd edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Spelke, E. S., and Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spelke, E. S., and Walle, G. (1993). Perceiving and reasoning about objects: Insights from infants. In Eilan, N., McCarthy, R., and Brewer, B. (eds.), Spatial Representation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., Cara, F., and Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spivey, M. (2007). The Continuity of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, J. F., and Stoodley, C. S. (2006). Neuroscience: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sterelny, K. (1990). The Representational Theory of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier. C., and Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thelen, E., and Smith, L. (eds.) (1993). A Dynamical Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tolman, E. C., and Honzik, C. H. (1930). “Insight” in rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 215–32.Google Scholar

Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F., and Kalish, D. (1946). Studies in spatial learning, II: Place learning versus response learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 221–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trappenberg, T. P. (2002). Fundamentals of Computational Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E. and Donaldson, W. (eds.), Organization of Memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Turing, A. M. (1936–7). On computable numbers: With an application to the Entscheidungsproblem [Decision Problem]. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42, 3–4.Google Scholar

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tye, M. (1991). The Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Umilta, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., et al. (2001). I know what you are doing: A neurophysiological study. Neuron, 31, 155–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ungerleider, L. G., and Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In Ingle, D. J., Mansfield, R. J. W., and Goodale, M. A. (eds.), Analysis of Visual Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vaina, L. M. (ed.) (1991). From the Retina to the Neocortex. Boston, MA: Springer.CrossRef

Essen, D. C., and Gallant, J. L. (1994). Neural mechanisms of form and motion processing in the primate visual system. Neuron, 13, 1–10. Reprinted (2001) in Bechtel, W., Mandik, P., Mundale, J., and R. S. Stufflebeam (eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation?The Journal of Philosophy, 92, 345–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 615–28.Google ScholarPubMed

Wang, S.-H., and Baillargeon, R. (2008). Detecting impossible changes in infancy: A three-system account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist sees it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiskopf, D. A. (2004). The place of time in cognition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., and Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40, 655–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, R. A. (2008). The drink you have when you're not having a drink. Mind and Language, 23, 273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wimmer, H., and Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding Natural Language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Winograd, T. (1973). A procedural model of language understanding. In Schank, R. C. and Colby, A. M. (eds.), Computer Models of Thought and Language. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Woodward, A., and Needham, A. (2009). Learning and the Infant Mind. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zeki, S. M. (1978). Functional specialization in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey. Nature, 274, 423–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar