Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-599mq Total loading time: 0.622 Render date: 2022-12-09T23:52:12.678Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Part III - Gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

Esther Eidinow
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Armin W. Geertz
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
John North
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Andersen, M. 2019. ‘Predictive Coding in Agency Detection’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 9(1): 120.Google Scholar
Andersen, M., Pfeiffer, T., Müller, S., and Schjoedt, U.. 2019. ‘Agency Detection in Predictive Minds: A Virtual Reality Study’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 9(1): 5264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, S. and Norenzayan, A.. 2004. ‘Religion’s Evolutionary Landscape: Counterintuition, Commitment, Compassion, Communion’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(6): 713730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, J. L. 2000. ‘Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. L., and Lanman, J. A.. 2008. ‘The Science of Religious Beliefs’, Religion 38(2): 109124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, H. 2010. Mystery Cults in the Ancient World. London.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1965. ‘Some Persons in Plutarch’s Moralia’, Classical Quarterly 15(2): 267270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, P. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 1984. ‘Greek Maenadism Reconsidered’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 55: 267286.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2019. ‘Greek Maenadism’, in Bremmer, J. N., ed. The World of Greek Religion and Mythology: Collected Essays II, 251278. Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. 1982. ‘Dionysus and the Women of Elis: PMG 871’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 23(4): 305314.Google Scholar
Bundrick, S. D. 2015. ‘Athenian Eye Cups in Context’, American Journal of Archaeology 119(3): 295341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. A. 1988. Greek Lyric, Volume II: Anacreon, Anacreontea, Choral Lyric from Olympus to Alcman. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Carpenter, T. H. 1997. Dionysian Imagery in Fifth-Century Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2013. ‘Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3): 181204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connelly, J. B. 2007. Portrait of a Priestess: Women and Ritual in Ancient Greece. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1940. ‘Maenadism in the Bacchae’, The Harvard Theological Review 33(3): 155176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1951. Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1960. Euripides’ Bacchae. Oxford.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1960. ‘Representations of Maenads on Archaic Red-Figure Vases’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 80: 7887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2013 [2007]. Oracles, Curses, and Risk among the Ancient Greeks. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2019. ‘The (Ancient Greek) Subject Supposed to Believe’, Numen 66(1): 5688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. 1986. ‘EYE-CUP’, Revue Archéologique 1: 520.Google Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, F. 1989. ‘In the Mirror of the Mask’, in Berard, C., ed. A City of Images, 151167.Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Geertz, A. W. 2010. ‘Too Much Mind and Not Enough Brain, Body and Culture. On What Needs to be Done in the Cognitive Science of Religion’, Historia Religionum 2: 2138.Google Scholar
Goff, B. 2004. Citizen Bacchae: Women’s Ritual Practice in Ancient Greece. Oakland, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, C. J., Hahn, A. G., Scroop, G. C., Watson, D. B., Norton, K. I., Wood, R. J., Campbell, D. P., and Emonson, D. L.. 1996. ‘Increased Arterial Desaturation in Trained Cyclists during Maximal Exercise at 580 m Altitude’, Journal of Applied Physiology 80(6): 22042210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gore, C. J., McSharry, P. E., Hewitt, A. J., and Saunders, P. U.. 2008. ‘Preparation for Football Competition at Moderate to High Altitude’, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 18(s1): 8595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guthrie, S. 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2009. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. E. 1903. Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2015. ‘Beyond the Polis? New Approaches to Greek Religion’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 135: 165180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, T. 2016. ‘Belief vs. Practice’, in Eidinow, E. and Kindt, J., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion, 2128. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. 1994. ‘Silens, Nymphs, and Maenads’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 114: 4769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, A. 2016. Der Gott des Gelages: Dionysos, Satyrn und Mänaden auf attischem Trinkgeschirr des 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Berlin and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1969. ‘Die Maenaden von Milet’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 4: 223241.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1978. ‘Greek Maenadism from Olympias to Messalina’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 82: 121160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1982. ‘Changing Dionysiac Identities’, in Meyer, B. F. and Sanders, E. P., eds. Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, vol. 3, 137160. London.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1984. ‘Loss of Self, Suffering, Violence: The Modern View of Dionysus from Nietzsche to Girard’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 88: 205240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1987. ‘Myth Visualized: Dionysos and His Circle in Sixth-Century Attic Vase-Painting’, in Papers on the Amasis Painter and His World, 94124. Malibu, CA.Google Scholar
Herman, G. 2011. ‘Greek Epiphanies and the Sensed Presence’, História: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 60(2): 127157.Google Scholar
Herrmann, P. 1998. Inschriften von Milet, Teil 2: Inschriften n.407-1019. Berlin and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. P., Tuttle, T., and Higgins, J. A.. 2010. ‘Altitude and the Heart: Is Going High Safe for Your Cardiac Patient?’, American Heart Journal 159(1): 2532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hohwy, J. 2013. The Predictive Mind. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J. D. 1994. Environmental Problems of the Greeks and Romans: Ecology in the Ancient Mediterranean. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Isler-Kerényi, C. 2001. ‘Review: Susanne Moraw, Die Mänade in der attischen Vasenmalerei des 6. und 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr.’, Gnomon 73(4): 336342.Google Scholar
Kapetanopoulos, E. 1966. ‘Klea and Leontis: Two Ladies from Delphi’, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 90: 119130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kefalidou, E. 2009. ‘The Iconography of Madness in Attic Vase-Painting’, in Oakley, J. H. and Palagia, O., eds. Athenian Potters and Painters Volume II, 9099. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kern, O. 1900. Die Inschriften von Magnesia am Maenader. Berlin.Google Scholar
Keuls, E. C. 1985. The Reign of the Phallus: Sexual Politics in Ancient Athens. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Kindt, J. 2012. Rethinking Greek Religion. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korshak, Y. 1987. Frontal Faces in Attic Vase Painting of the Archaic Period. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Lawler, L. B. 1927. ‘The Maenads: A Contribution to the Study of the Dance in Ancient Greece’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 6: 69112.Google Scholar
Lewis, I. M. 1971. Ecstatic Religion: A Study of Shamanism and Spirit Possession. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Lopez, C. and Blanke, O.. 2011. ‘The Thalamocortical Vestibular System in Animals and Humans’, Brain Research Reviews 67(1): 119146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, N. J. 2019. ‘The Rational Irrationalist: Dodds and the Paranormal’, in Rediscovering E. R. Dodds: Scholarship, Education, Poetry, and the Paranormal. Oxford.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, M. 2014a. ‘Fauna of the Ancient Mediterranean World’, in Campbell, G. L., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life, 156179. Oxford.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, M. 2014b. ‘Hunting’, in Campbell, G. L., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life, 203215. Oxford.Google Scholar
Maij, D. L. R., van Schie, H. T., and van Elk, M.. 2019. ‘The Boundary Conditions of the Hypersensitive Agency Detection Device: An Empirical Investigation of Agency Detection in Threatening Situations’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 9(1): 2351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. H. 2006. ‘Cognitive Science, Ritual, and the Hellenistic Mystery Religions’, Religion and Theology 13(3–4): 383395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mast, F. W. and Ellis, A. W.. 2017. ‘Internal Models, Vestibular Cognition, and Mental Imagery: Conceptual Considerations’, in Ferrè, E. R. and Harris, L. R., eds. Vestibular Cognition, 89106. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
McNally, S. 1978. ‘The Maenad in Early Greek Art’, Arethusa 11: 101135.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. 1972. ‘Milesische Bakchen’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 9: 7783.Google Scholar
Mills, S. 2016. Auditory Archaeology: Understanding Sound and Hearing in the Past. New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraw, S. 1998. Die Mänade in der attischen Vasenmalerei des 6. und 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Mainz.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2010. ‘The Ecstasy and the Tragedy: Varieties of Religious Experience in Art, Drama and Society’, in Osborne, R., ed. Athens and Athenian Democracy, 368404. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2018. The Transformation of Athens: Painted Pottery and the Creation of Classical Greece. Oxford and Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 2011. On Greek Religion. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar
Peirce, S. 1998. ‘Visual Language and Concepts of Cult on the “Lenaia Vases”’, Classical Antiquity 17(1): 5995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petridou, G. 2016. Divine Epiphany in Greek Literature and Culture. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I.. 2016. Inner Purity and Pollution in Greek Religion: Volume I: Early Greek Religion. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, V. J. 2011. Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Platt, V. J. 2016. ‘Epiphany’, in Eidinow, E. and Kindt, J., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion, 493504. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rapp, A. 1872. ‘Die Mänade im griechischen Cultus, in der Kunst und Poesie’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 27: 1–22, 563611.Google Scholar
Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., and Nuortimo, A.. 2013. ‘Paranormal and Religious Believers are More Prone to Illusory Face Perception than Skeptics and Non-believers’, Applied Cognitive Psychology 27(2): 150155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, E. 1894. Psyche: Seelencult und Unsterblichkeitsglaube der Griechen, vol. 2. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. 1925. Psyche: The Cult of Souls and Belief in Immortality among the Greeks. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Rouget, G. 1985. Music and Trance: A Theory of the Relations Between Music and Possession. Chicago, IL and London.Google Scholar
Santamaría, M. A. 2013. ‘The Term βάκχος and Dionysos Βάκχιος’, in Bernabé, A., de Jáuregui, M. Herrero, Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I., and Martín Hernández, R., eds. Redefining Dionysos, 3857. Berlin and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesier, R. 1993. ‘Mixtures of Masks: Maenads as Tragic Models’, in Carpenter, T. H. and Faraone, C. A., eds. Masks of Dionysus, 89114. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Scullion, S. 1999. ‘Tradition and Invention in Euripidean Aitiology’, Illinois Classical Studies 24/25: 217233.Google Scholar
Scullion, S. 2002. ‘“Nothing to Do with Dionysus”: Tragedy Misconceived As Ritual’, Classical Quarterly 52(1): 102137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. 1981. ‘Dionysiac Drama and the Dionysian Mysteries’, Classical Quarterly 31(2): 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. 1987. ‘Pentheus’ Vision: Bacchae 918-22’, Classical Quarterly 37(1): 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. 1996. The Plays of Euripides: Bacchae. Oxford.Google Scholar
Seemungal, B. M. 2017. ‘The Components of Vestibular Cognition – Motion versus Spatial Perception’, in Ferrè, E. R. and Harris, L. R., eds. Vestibular Cognition, 2542. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Shukitt-Hale, B., and Lieberman, H. R.. 1996. ‘The Effect of Altitude on Cognitive Performance and Mood States’, in Marriott, B. M. and Carlson, S. J., eds. Nutritional Needs and Cold and High-Altitude Environments: Applications for Military Personnel in Field Operations, 435451. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, F. 1955. Lois sacrées de l’Asie Mineure. Paris.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. 2008. Aeschylus III: Fragments. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1990. ‘What Is Polis Religion?’, in Murray, O. and Price, S.R.F., eds. The Greek City: From Homer to Alexander, 295322. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tian, X. and Poeppel, D.. 2010. ‘Mental Imagery of Speech and Movement Implicates the Dynamics of Internal Forward Models’, Frontiers in Psychology 1: Article 166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ustinova, Y. 2018. Divine Mania: Alteration of Consciousness in Ancient Greece. London.Google Scholar
van Elk, M. 2013. ‘Paranormal Believers Are More Prone to Illusory Agency Detection than Skeptics’, Consciousness and Cognition 22(3): 10411046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Leeuwen, N. and van Elk, M.. 2018. ‘Seeking the Supernatural: The Interactive Religious Experience Model’, Religion, Brain & Behavior: 131.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. and Frontisi-Ducroux, F.. 1988. ‘Features of the Mask in Ancient Greece’, in Vernant, J. P. and Vidal-Naquet, P., eds. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, 189206. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. 2011. Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, B. 2009. ‘Euripides’ “Bacchae” and Classical Typologies of Pentheus’ “Sparagmos” 510-406 BC’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 52: 1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weniger, L. 1883. Das Kollegium der sechzehn Frauen und der Dionysosdienst in Elis. Weimar.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Ambasciano, L. 2015. ‘Review of Mastrocinque, A. 2014. Bona Dea and the Cults of Roman Women. Stuttgart’, Culture and Religion: An Interdisciplinary Journal (16)1: 110112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambasciano, L. 2016a. ‘Wine, Brains, and Snakes: An Ancient Roman Cult between Gendered Contaminants, Sexuality, and Pollution Beliefs’, Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 4(2): 123164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambasciano, L. 2016b. ‘The Gendered Deep History of the Bona Dea Cult’, Journal of Cognitive Historiography 3(1–2): 134156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambasciano, L. 2016c. ‘The Goddess Who Failed? Competitive Networks (or the Lack Thereof), Gender Politics, and the Diffusion of the Roman Cult of Bona Dea’, Religio: Revue Pro Religionistiku 24(2): 111165.Google Scholar
Ambasciano, L. 2016d. ‘The Fate of a Healing Goddess: Ocular Pathologies, the Antonine Plague, and the Ancient Roman Cult of Bona Dea’, Open Library of Humanities 1(1): 134. p.e13. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.42Google Scholar
Ambasciano, L. 2017. ‘What Is Cognitive Historiography, Anyway? Method, Theory, and a Cross-Disciplinary Decalogue’, Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4(2): 136150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambasciano, L. 2019. ‘The Cognitive Study of (Ancient) Religions’, in Roubekas, N., ed. Theorizing Ancient Religion, 327360. Sheffield and Bristol.Google Scholar
Ampolo, C. 1999. ‘La città riformata e l’organizzazione centuriata. Lo spazio, Il tempo, il sacro nella nuova realtà urbana’, in Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A., Storia di Roma, 4985. Turin.Google Scholar
Ando, C. and Rüpke, J. (eds, assisted by Blake, S. and Holban, M.). 2006. Religion and Law in Classical and Christian Rome. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Arnhold, M. 2015. ‘Male Worshippers and the Cult of Bona Dea’, Religion in the Roman Empire 1(1): 5170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldi, P. 2002. The Foundations of Latin. Berlin and New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberger, J. 1974. ‘The Myth of Matriarchy: Why Men Rule in Primitive Society’, in Lamphere, L. and Zimbalist Rosaldo, M., eds. Women, Culture, Women, and Society, 263280. Stanford.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2015. SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome. London.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2017. Women and Power: A Manifesto. London.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. 2009. Affari di famiglia. La parentela romana nella letteratura e nella cultura antica. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. 2016. Dèi e uomini nella città. Antropologia, religione e cultura nella Roma antica. Rome.Google Scholar
Bloch, H. 2009. Medieval Misogyny and the Invention of Western Romantic Love. Chicago, IL and London.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. and Sperber, D.. 2002. ‘Kinship and Evolved Psychological Dispositions: The Mother’s Brother Controversy Reconsidered’, Current Anthropology 43(5): 723748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (trans. Nice, R.). 2001 [1998]. Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Brelich, A. 2010 [1976]. Tre variazioni romane sul tema delle origini. A cura di A. Alessandri. Rome.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. 2004. ‘Review of Motte, A. and Ternes, C. (eds). 2003. Dieux, fêtes, sacré dans la Grèce et la Rome antiques, Turnhout’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2004.02.07. http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2004/2004-02-07Google Scholar
Brouwer, H. H. J. 1989. Bona Dea: The Sources and a Description of the Cult. Leiden and New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, C. D. 1904. A Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian: With a Collection of Inscriptions and a Glossary. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Cantarella, E. (trans. Fant, M. B.). 1987 [1981]. Pandora’s Daughters. The Role and Status of Women in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Cantarella, E. 1999. ‘La vita delle donne’, in Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A., eds. Storia di Roma, 867894. Turin.Google Scholar
Cantarella, E. 2010 [1996]. Passato prossimo. Donne romane da Tacita a Sulpicia. Milan.Google Scholar
Cantarella, E. 2020 [2017]. Come uccidere il padre. Genitori e figli da Roma a oggi. Milan.Google Scholar
Chalupa, A. 2009. ‘Religious Change in Roman Religion from the Perspective of Whitehouse’s Theory of the Two Modes of Religiosity’, in Martin, L. H. and Pachis, P., eds. Imagistic Traditions in the Graeco-Roman World: A Cognitive Modeling of History of Religious Research, 113135. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Chioffi, L. 1993. ‘Bona Dea’, ‘Bona Dea Subsaxana’, in Steinby, E. M., ed. Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae I, 197–198, 200201. Rome.Google Scholar
Conway, R. S. 1897. The Italic Dialects, Edited with a Grammar and Glossary, vol. I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crawford, M., Broadhead, W. M., Clackson, J. P. T., Santangelo, F., Thompson, S. and Watmough, M., eds. 2011. Imagines Italicae: A Corpus of Italic Inscriptions. London.Google Scholar
Culham, P. 2004. ‘Women in the Roman Republic’, in Flower, H. I., ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, 139159. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dávid-Barrett, T. and Carney, J.. 2016. ‘The Deification of Historical Figures and the Emergence of Priesthoods As a Solution to a Network Coordination Problem’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 6(4): 307317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De’ Guidobaldi, G. 1865. Damia o Buona Dea. Ad occasione d’una iscrizione osca opistografa su di una terracotta campana del Museo Nazionale. Naples.Google Scholar
DiLuzio, M. J. 2016. A Place at the Altar: Priestesses in Republican Rome. Princeton, NJ and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionisio, A. 2016. ‘Caratteri dei culti femminili a Corfinio’, Archeologia Classica 64: 223262.Google Scholar
Dorcey, P. J. 1992. The Cult of Silvanus in the Roman World: A Study in Roman Folk Religion. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. 2013. ‘The Origin of Religion As a Small-Scale Phenomenon’, in Clarke, S., Powell, R. and Savulescu, J., eds. Religion, Intolerance, and Conflict: A Scientific and Conceptual Investigation, 4866. Oxford and New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farney, G. D. and Bradley, G., eds. 2018. The Peoples of Ancient Italy. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Gladden, P. R. and Beck, C. J. A.. 2012. ‘Intimate Partner Violence and Life History Strategy’, in Shackelford, T. K. and Goetz, A. T., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Sexual Conflict in Humans, 7299. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. T. 2012. ‘Egnatius, the Breathalyzer Kiss, and an Early Instance of Domestic Homicide at Rome’, in Niang, A. C. and Osiek, C., eds. Text, Image, and Christians in the Graeco-Roman World, 119131. Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Flemming, R. 2007. ‘Festus and the Role of Women in Roman Religion’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 50(S93): 87108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (trans. R. Hurley). 1978. The History of Sexuality. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Gordon, C.. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Frank, T. 1927. ‘The Bacchanalian Cult of 186 B.C.’, Classical Quarterly 21(3/4): 128132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabba, E. 1981. ‘True History and False History in Classical Antiquity’, Journal of Roman Studies 71: 5062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, V. M. 2012. Sacerdotes piae: Priestesses and Other Female Cult Officials in the Western Part of the Roman Empire from the First Century B.C. until the Third Century A.D. PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Geertz, A. M. 2010. ‘Brain, Body and Culture: A Biocultural Theory of Religion,’ Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 22(4): 304321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, A. M. 2013. ‘Whence Religion? How the Brain Constructs the World and What This Might Tell Us about the Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture’, in Geertz, A. W., ed. Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture, 1770. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Giannelli, G. 1913. Il sacerdozio delle Vestali romane. Florence.Google Scholar
Gilhus, I. S. 2010. ‘Contextualizing the Present, Manipulating the Past: Codex II from Nag Hammadi and the Challenge of Circumventing Canonicity’, in Thomassen, E., ed. Canon and Canonicity: The Formation and Use of Scripture, 91108. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Gorelik, G. and Shackelford, T. K.. 2012. ‘Spheres of Sexual Conflict’, in Shackelford, T. K. and Goetz, A. T., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Sexual Conflict in Humans, 331346. Oxford and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Griffith, A. B. 2009. ‘The ‘Modes Theory’ and Roman Religion: National Catastrophe and Religious Response in the Second Punic War’, in Martin, L. H. and Pachis, P., eds. Imagistic Traditions in the Graeco-Roman World: A Cognitive Modeling of History of Religious Research. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Harders, A.-C. 2013. ‘Agnatio, Cognatio, Consanguinitas: Kinship and Blood in Ancient Rome,’ in Johnson, C. H., Jussen, B., Sabean, D. W. and Teuscher, S., eds. Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present, 1839. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Henry, M. M. and James, S. L.. 2012. ‘Woman, City, State: Theories, Ideologies, and Concepts in the Archaic and Classical Periods,’ in James, S. L. and Dillon, S., eds. A Companion to Women in the Ancient World, 8495. Malden, MA and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, L. 2011. ‘Family Nomenclature and Same-Name Divinities in Roman Religion and Mythology’, Classical World 104(2): 211226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. A. 2012. Gender: Antiquity and Its Legacy. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Huxley, A. 1984. Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited. London.Google Scholar
James, S. L. and Dillon, S., eds. 2012. A Companion to Women in the Ancient World. Malden, MA and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannowsky, W., Pedley, J. Griffiths and Torelli, M.. 1983. ‘Excavations at Paestum 1982’, American Journal of Archaeology 87(3): 293303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraemer, R. S. 1992. Her Share of the Blessings: Women’s Religion among Pagans, Jews and Christians in the Greco-Roman World. New York, NY and OxfordGoogle Scholar
Larson, J. 2016. Understanding Greek Religion. London and New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legare, C. and Watson-Jones., R. E. 2016. ‘The Evolution and Ontogeny of Ritual’, in Buss, D., ed. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Volume 2: Integrations, 829847. Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Lincoln, B. 1981. Emerging from the Chrysalis: Studies in Rituals of Women’s Initiation. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Maganzani, L. 2016. ‘Per uno sguardo antropologico del giurista: il rapporto padre-figlio nel mondo romano’, in McClintock, A., ed. Giuristi nati. Antropologia e diritto romano, 99134. Bologna.Google Scholar
Marcattili, F. 2010. ‘Bona Dea, ἡ θεὸς γυναικεία’, Archeologia Classica 61: 740.Google Scholar
Marcattili, F. 2012. ‘Per un’archeologia dell’Aventino: i culti della media Repubblica’, Mélanges de l’École française de Rome – Antiquité 124(1): 109122.Google Scholar
Marconi, M. 1939. Riflessi mediterranei nella più antica religione laziale. Messina and Milan.Google Scholar
Martin, C. 2012. A Critical Introduction to the Study of Religion. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Martin, L. H. 2009. ‘Conclusion: Imagistic Traditions in the Graeco-Roman World’, in Martin, L. H. and Pachis, P., eds. Imagistic Traditions in the Graeco-Roman World: A Cognitive Modeling of History of Religious Research, 238247. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Martin, L. H. 2014. Deep History, Secular Theory: Historical and Scientific Studies of Religion. Boston, MA and Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. H. 2015. The Mind of Mithraists: Historical and Cognitive Studies in the Roman Cult of Mithras. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Martin, L. H. 2018. Studies in Hellenistic Religions. Selected and Edited with an Introduction by P. Pachis. Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Martzloff, V. and Machajdíková, B.. 2017. ‘Structures strophiques dans la poésie épigraphique de l’Italie ancienne: inscription latine archaïque du duenos (CIL I2 4), épitaphe pélignienne de la pristafalacirix (ST Pg 9, Corfinium)’, Graeco-Latina Brunensia 22(1): 147163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrocinque, A. 1993. Romolo. La fondazione di Roma tra storia e leggenda. Este.Google Scholar
Mastrocinque, A. 2011a. ‘Orfismo nel culto romano di Bona Dea (OF 584)’, in Herrero de Jáuregui, M., San Cristóbal, A. I. J., Martínez, E. R. L., Hernández, R. M., Álvarez, M. A. S and Tovar, S. T., eds. 2011. Tracing Orpheus: Studies of Orphic Fragments in Honour of Alberto Bernabé, 259268. Berlin and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Mastrocinque, A. 2011b. ‘Religione e politica: Il caso di Bona Dea’, in Cecconi, G. A. and Gabrielli, C., eds. Politiche religiose nel mondo antico e tardoantico: Poteri e indirizzi, forme del controllo, idee e prassi di tolleranza, 165172. Bari.Google Scholar
Mastrocinque, A. 2014. Bona Dea and the Cults of Roman Women. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. N. and Lawson, E. T., 2002. Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological Foundations of Cultural Forms. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignone, L. M. 2016. The Republican Aventine and Rome’s Social Order. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorton, R. 1988. ‘The Genealogy of Latinus in Vergil’s Aeneid’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 118: 253259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nencini, P. 2009. Ubriachezza e sobrietà nel mondo antico. Alle radici del bere moderno. Monte San Pietro (BO).Google Scholar
Piccaluga, G. 1964. ‘Bona Dea. Due contributi all’interpretazione del suo culto’, Studi e materiali di storia delle religioni 35: 195237.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2009. ‘Writing Women into History’, in Erskine, A., ed. A Companion to Ancient History, 146153. Malden, MA and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2014. ‘Historicizing Religion: Varro’s Antiquitates and History of Religion in the Late Roman Republic.’ History of Religions 53(3): 246268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. (trans. Richardson, D. M. B.). 2018 [2016]. Pantheon: A New History of Roman Religion. Princeton, NJ and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheid, J. 2002 [1992]. ‘The Religious Role of Roman Women’, in Duby, G., Perrot, M. and Schmitt Pantel, P., eds. A History of Women: From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints, 377408. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2011. ‘The Roman Slave Supply’, in Bradley, K. and Cartledge, P., eds. The Cambridge World History of Slavery, vol. I: The Ancient Mediterranean World, 287310. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2014. ‘Evolutionary Psychology and the Historian’, American Historical Review 119(5): 15631575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, R. and Rüpke, J. 1987/2005. ‘Roman Religion: The Early Period’, in Jones, L., ed. Encyclopaedia of Religion (2nd ed.), vol. 12, 78927911, Detroit, MI and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Smail, D. L. 2008. On Deep History and the Brain. Los Angeles and Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Smail, D. L. 2010. ‘An Essay on Neurohistory’, in Bailar, M., Emerging Disciplines: Shaping New Fields of Scholarly Inquiry in and beyond the Humanities, 201228. Houston, TX. https://cnx.org/contents/iqMKXpSE@1.4:tbT41NAE@4/An-Essay-on-NeurohistoryGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. J. 2006. The Roman Clan: The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. Z. 1990. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Stoczkowski, W. (trans. Turton, M.). 2002 [1994]. Explaining Human Origins: Myth, Imagination and Conjecture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 1999. The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill, NC and London.Google Scholar
Turner, J. H., Maryanski, A., Petersen, A. K. and Geertz, A. W.. 2018. The Emergence and Evolution of Religion by Means of Natural Selection. New York, NY and London.Google Scholar
Untermann, J. 2000. Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Ustinova, Y. 2018. ‘Amazons East and West: A Real-Life Experiment in Social Cognition’, in Petersen, A. K., Ingvild, S. G., Martin, L. H., Jensen, J. S. and Jesper Sørensen, J., eds. Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion: A New Synthesis, 461474. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. 1990. ‘What’s Sauce for the Goose Is Sauce for the Gander: Myth and Ritual, Old and New,’ in Edmunds, L., ed. Approaches to Greek Myth, 2390. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. 1992. ‘The Festival for Bona Dea and the Thesmophoria’, Greece & Rome, n.s. 39(1): 3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watmough, M. M. T. 1995/1996. ‘The Suffix -tor-: Agent-Noun Formation in Latin and the Other Italic Languages’, Glotta 73 (1/4): 80115.Google Scholar
Welch, T. S. 2004. ‘Masculinity and Monuments in Propertius 4.9’, American Journal of Philology 125(1): 6190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whatmough, J. 1931. ‘The Calendar in Ancient Italy Outside Rome’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 42: 157179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H. 2002. ‘Modes of Religiosity: Towards a Cognitive Explanation of the Sociopolitical Dynamics of Religion’, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14(3/4): 293315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H. 2004. ‘Theorizing Religions Past’, in Whitehouse, H. and Martin, L. H., eds. Theorizing Religions Past, 215232. Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
Williams, Z. 2016. ‘Interview with Mary Beard: ‘The Role of the Academic is to Make Everything Less Simple’, The Guardian, 23 April. www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/23/mary-beard-the-role-of-the-academic-is-to-make-everything-less-simpleGoogle Scholar
Wilson, N. G. ed. 2003. Pietro Bembo, Oratio pro litteris graecis. Messina.Google Scholar
Wonder, J. W. 2002. ‘What Happened to the Greeks in Lucanian-Occupied Paestum? Multiculturalism in Southern Italy’, Phoenix 56(1/2): 4055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, G. 2014. ‘Isis and the Evolution of Religion.’ in Bricault, L. and Versluys, M. J., eds. Power, Politics and the Cults of Isis, 6292. Leiden.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2018. Critics, Compilers, and Commentators: An Introduction to Roman Philology, 200 BCE–800 CE. Oxford.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Gender
  • Edited by Esther Eidinow, University of Bristol, Armin W. Geertz, Aarhus Universitet, Denmark, John North, University College London
  • Book: Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience
  • Online publication: 28 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009019927.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Gender
  • Edited by Esther Eidinow, University of Bristol, Armin W. Geertz, Aarhus Universitet, Denmark, John North, University College London
  • Book: Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience
  • Online publication: 28 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009019927.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Gender
  • Edited by Esther Eidinow, University of Bristol, Armin W. Geertz, Aarhus Universitet, Denmark, John North, University College London
  • Book: Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience
  • Online publication: 28 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009019927.009
Available formats
×