Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-4k54s Total loading time: 0.548 Render date: 2021-12-04T02:53:14.043Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

37 - Industry representatives, gift-giving, and conflicts of interest

from Section 6 - Special topics in pediatric ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

Douglas S. Diekema
Affiliation:
Seattle Children's Research Institute
Mark R. Mercurio
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine
Mary B. Adam
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Arizona School of Medicine, Tucson
Get access

Summary

Case narrative

During an outpatient rotation in the pediatric gastroenterology clinic, Dr. Q (a second-year resident) finishes observing a colonoscopy in the operating room and returns to the Doctors’ Lounge with the Gastroenterology fellow and attending physician to take a short break before the next procedure. It is lunchtime, and they are hungry. The next procedure will start in 15 minutes, and the cafeteria line will be too long to get lunch and return before the next procedure starts. They all enter the lounge and immediately see a well-dressed man sitting at a table with a 3-foot-long sub sandwich, a plate of brownies, and a display of brand-name skin care dressings commonly used by surgeons, emergency rooms, and in pediatricians’ offices. He offers them all lunch. Dr. Q is particularly hungry, having skipped breakfast, and sees the fellow and staff physician accept a sub and a brownie. She pauses only a moment before filling a plate herself. The man at the table only mentions that his company is excited about this new product and hands over a brochure and pen with each plate of food, but demands no more of the physicians’ time. At the table, Dr. Q slides the pen into her pocket, briefly opens the brochure, but quickly engages in conversation with the fellow and attending physician, and leaves the brochure on the table as she departs.

A free lunch?

Of course, it is not surprising that in a stressful or busy situation thoughts often go quickly to self-preservation or, in this case, eating lunch. However, the acceptance of the food sets up a particularly powerful impulse to reciprocate in some way. A conflict of interest exists when professional judgment concerning a primary interest is unduly influenced by a secondary interest. In this case, the primary interest is good treatment of patients’ wounds to promote the most effective healing, and the secondary interest is satisfaction of personal hunger at lunchtime. Of course, it is not without careful consideration of marketing principles that the salesperson offers food to potential clients. By accepting the food from the salesman, a positive feeling is associated with the salesperson and with the brand-name of the product he represents. Furthermore, the acceptance of the food by the mentors of the resident reinforces that this type of behavior is acceptable even though there are consequences that they may not have carefully considered.

Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Ethics in Pediatrics
A Case-Based Textbook
, pp. 215 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education 2007 www.accme.org
Angell, M. 2004 The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What To Do About ItNew YorkRandom House
Association of American Medical Colleges 2008 https://services.aamc.org/publications/showfile.cfm?file
Babcock, L.Loewenstein, G. 1997 Explaining bargaining impasse: the role of self-serving biasesJournal of Economic Perspectives 11 109Google Scholar
Becker, L.C. 1990 ReciprocityChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
Brennan, T.A.Rothman, D.J.Blank, L. 2006 Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest; a policy proposal for academic medical centersJAMA 295 429Google Scholar
Brody, H. 2007 Hooked: Ethics, the Medical Profession and the Pharmaceutical IndustryLanham, MDRowman & Littlefield
Campbell, E.G.Gruen, R.L.Mountford, J. 2007 A national survey of physician-industry relationshipsNew England Journal of Medicine 356 1742Google Scholar
Chren, M.-M.Landefeld, C.S. 1994 Physicians’ behavior and their interactions with drug companies: a controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formularyJAMA 271 684Google Scholar
Erde, E.J. 1996 Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Practice and ResearchSpeece, R.G.Shimm, D.S.Buchanan, A.E.New YorkOxford University Press
Gibbons, R.V.Landry, F.J.Blouch, D.L. 1998 A comparison of physicians’ and patients’ attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry giftsJournal of General Internal Medicine 33 151Google Scholar
Gouldner, A.W. 1960 The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statementAmerican Sociological Review 25 161Google Scholar
Kassirer, J.P. 2005 On the Take: How Medicine’s Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your HealthNew YorkOxford University Press
Koriat, A.Lichtenstein, S.Fischhoff, B. 1980 Reasons for confidenceJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6 194Google Scholar
Morreim, E.H. 2005 The clinical investigator as fiduciary: discarding a misguided ideaJournal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 3 586Google Scholar
Schwartz, T.L.Kuhles, D.J.Wade, M.Masand, P.S. 2001 Newly admitted psychiatric patient prescriptions and pharmaceutical sales visitsAnnals of Clinical Psychiatry 13 159Google Scholar
Sernyak, M.Rosenheck, R. 2007 Experience of VA psychiatrists with pharmaceutical detailing of antipsychotic medicationsPsychiatric Services 58 1292Google Scholar
Steinman, M.A.Shlipak, M.G.McPhee, S.J. 2001 Of principles and pens: attitudes and practices of medicine house staff toward pharmaceutical industry promotionsAmerican Journal of Medicine 110 551Google Scholar
Strohmetz, D.B.Rind, B.Fisher, R.Lynn, M. 2002 Sweetening the till: the use of candy to increase restaurant tippingJournal of Applied Social Psychology 32 300Google Scholar
Tiger, L.Fox, R. 1998 The Imperial AnimalNew Brunswick, NJTransaction Publishers
Wazana, A. 2000 Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. Is a gift ever just a gift?JAMA 283 373Google Scholar
Zaner, R.M. 1988 Ethics and the Clinical EncounterEnglewood Cliffs, NJPrentice Hall
1
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×