Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-wdwc2 Total loading time: 0.774 Render date: 2022-01-21T21:25:43.385Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Karsten Neuhoff
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Climate Policy after Copenhagen
The Role of Carbon Pricing
, pp. 248 - 263
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


,AEA Technology Environment (2004). An Evaluation of the Air Quality Strategy. London: DEFRA.Google Scholar
Åhman, M., Burtraw, D., Kruger, J. A. and Lars, Z. (2007). ‘A Ten-Year Rule to Guide the Allocation of EU Emission Allowances’. Energy Policy, 35(3): 1718–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Åhman, M. and Holmgren, K. (2006). Harmonising New Entrant Allocation in the Nordic Energy Sectors: Current Principles and Options for EU ETS Phase II. Stockholm: IVL (Swedish Environmental Research Institute).Google Scholar
Aldy, J. E., Baron, R. and Tubiana, L. (2004). Addressing Cost: The Political Economy of Climate Change. Washington, DC: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
Alic, J. A., Mowery, D. S. and Rubin, E. S. (2003). US Technology and Innovation Policies: Lessons for Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change. November 2003. Available at Scholar
Andersen, M. S.Barker, T., Christie, E., Ekins, P., FitzGerald, J., Jilkova, J., Junankar, J., Landesmann, M., Pollitt, H., Salmons, R., Scott, S. and Speck, S. (2007). Competitiveness Effects of Environmental Tax Reforms (COMETR). University of Aarhus, National Environmental Research Institute.Google Scholar
Andersen, M. S. and Ekins, P. (2009). Carbon-Energy Taxation: Lessons from Europe. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, J. and Wang, X. (2004). ‘Equity and Climate: In Principle and Practice’. In Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change: 61–84.Google Scholar
Baker, T. and Koehler, J. (1998). ‘Equity and Ecotax Reform in the EU: Achieving a 10 Per Cent Reduction in CO2 Emissions Using Excise Duties’. Fiscal Studies, 19(4): 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J., Dessai, S. and Webber, M. (2004). ‘Will OPEC Lose from the Kyoto Protocol?’. Energy Policy, 32: 2077–2088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. and Ellis, J. (2006). Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Institutional and Operational Issues. Paris: IEA/OECD.Google Scholar
Baron, R., Reinaud, J., Genasci, M. and Philibert, C. (2007). Sectoral Approaches to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Exploring Issues for Heavy Industry. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and Statecraft. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazilian, M., Coninck, H., Radkac, M., Nakhooda, S., Boyd, W., McGill, I., Amin, A., Malmborg, F., Uosukainen, J., Bradley, R. and Bradley, R. (2008). Considering Technology Within the UN Climate Change Negotiations. ECN-E–08-077. Available at
,BBC (2007). ‘Most Ready for “Green Sacrifices”’. Available at
,BBC (2009). ‘G8 Leaders to Set Emissions Goals’. Available at
,BBC (2010). ‘Trafigura Found Guilty of Exporting Toxic Waste’. Available at
Bell, W. and Drexhage, J. (2005). Climate Change and the International Carbon Market. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Bergek, A. and Jacobson, S. (2003). ‘The Emergence of a Growth Industry: A Comparative Analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish Wind Turbine Industries’. In Metcalfe, J. and Canter, U. (eds), Change, Transformation, and Development. Heidelberg and New York: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bernstein, M. A. and Griffin, J. (2005). Regional Differences in the Price Elasticity of Demand for Energy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Black, R. and White, H. (2004). Targeting Development: Critical Perspectives on the Millennium Development Goals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2004). ‘Climate Commitments: Assessing the Options’. In Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change: 37–59.Google Scholar
Bohi, D. R. (1981). Analyzing Demand Behaviour: A Study of Energy Elasticities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Bohi, D. R. and Zimmerman, M. (1984). ‘An Update of Econometric Studies of Energy Demand’. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 9: 105–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhringer, C. and Lange, A. (2005). ‘On the Design of Optimal Grandfathering Schemes for Emission Allowances’. European Economic Review, 49(8): 2041–2055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosi, M. and Ellis, J. (2005). Exploring Options for ‘Sectoral Crediting Mechanism’. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Brons, M., Nijkamp, P., Pels, E. and Rietveld, P. (2006). A Meta-analysis of the Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand: A System of Equations Approach. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
Bruvoll, A. and Larsen, B. M. (2004). ‘Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Norway: Do Carbon Taxes Work?’. Energy Policy, 32(4): 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burniaux, J. M. and Martins, J. O. (2000). Carbon Emission Leakages: A General Equilibrium View. Paris: OECD Economics Department Working Papers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtraw, D., Palmer, K. and Kahn, D. (2005). Allocation of CO2 Emissions Allowances in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Program. RFF Discussion Paper (05–25). Washington, DC: RFF.Google Scholar
Caldeira, K., Jain, A. K. and Hoffert, M. I. (2003). ‘Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty and the Need for Energy Without CO2 Emission’. Science, 299(5615): 2052–2054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, C., Burtraw, D., Cropper, M. and Palmer, K. (2000). ‘SO2 Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?’. Journal of Political Economy, 108(6): 1292–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, P. and Michaelowa, A. (2008). Empirical Analysis of Performance of CDM Projects. Cambridge: Climate Strategies Report.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (2004). ‘Trade and Climate: Potential Conflicts and Synergies’. In Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change: 141–170.Google Scholar
Chas-Amil, M. L. and Buongiorno, J. (2000). ‘The Demand for Paper and Paperboard: Econometric Models for the European Union’. Applied Economics, 32: 987–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. (1960). ‘The Problem of Social Cost’. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1): 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombier, M. and Neuhoff, K. (2008). ‘Sectoral Emission Agreements: Can They Address Leakage?’. Environmental Policy and Law, 38(3): 161–166.Google Scholar
,Concorde East (2004). Mercury Flows in Europe and the World: The Impact of Decommissioned Chlor-Alkali Plants. Report for the European Commission. Brussels: Directorate General for Environment.Google Scholar
,Congressional Budget Office (2000). Who Gains and Who Pays under Carbon-Allowance Trading? The Distributional Effects of Alternative Policy Designs. Washington, DC: CBO Publications.Google Scholar
Considine, T. (1991). ‘Economic and Technological Determinants of the Material Intensity of Use’. Land Economics, 67(1): 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S. (1994). ‘North–South Trade and the Environment’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2): 755–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwall, A. and Creedy, J. (1996). ‘Carbon Taxation, Prices and Inequality in Australia’. Fiscal Studies, 17(3): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudouel, A., Hentschel, J. and Wodon, Q. (2002). Poverty Measurement and Analysis: A Sourcebook for Poverty Reduction Strategies. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Crocker, T. D. (1966). ‘The Structuring of Atmospheric Pollution Control Systems’. In Woloyin, H. (ed.), The Economics of Air Pollution. New York: W. W. Norton: 61–86.Google Scholar
Cust, J., Grant, K., Iliev, I. and Neuhoff, K. (2008). International Co-operation for Innovation and Use of Low-carbon Energy Technology. Cambridge: Climate Strategies Working Paper. Available at Scholar
DeCanio, S. (1998). ‘The Efficiency Paradox: Bureaucratic and Organizational Barriers to Profitable Energy-saving Investments’. Energy Policy, 26(5): 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,DEFRA (2007). ‘Consultation on Proposed UK Auction Design for Use during Phase II: EU Emissions Trading Scheme’. London: DEFRA.
Demailly, D. and Quirion, P. (2006). ‘CO2 Abatement, Competitiveness and Leakage in the European Cement Industry under the EU ETS: Grandfathering vs. Output-based Allocation’. Climate Policy, 6(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demailly, D. and Quirion, P. (2008). ‘European Emission Trading Scheme and Competitiveness: A Case Study on the Iron and Steel Industry’. Energy Economics, 30(4): 2009–2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennerlein, R. K.-H. (1990). Energieverbrauch privater Haushalte. Augsburg: Maro-Verlag.Google Scholar
,DTLR (2001). Local Public Service Agreements: New Challenges. London: Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions.Google Scholar
Edenhofer, O. and Lessmann, K. (2005). ‘Climate Policy and Energy Security’. In Müller, F. and Riechel, A. (eds), Options for Future Climate Policy: Transatlantic Perspectives. Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs: 111–123.Google Scholar
Edenhofer, O., Lessmann, K., Kemfert, C., Grubb, M. and Köhler, J. (2006). ‘Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization’. Energy Journal (Special Issue: Endogenous Technological Change and the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization): 57–122.Google Scholar
Ellerman, D. (2006). ‘New Entrant and Closure Provisions: How Do They Distort?’. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
Ellerman, D., Convery, J. F. and Perthuis, C. (2010). Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellerman, D. and Joskow, P. L. (2008). The European Union's Emissions Trading System in Perspective. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
Ellerman, D., Joskow, P. L., Schmalensee, R., Montero, J. P. and Bailey, E. M. (2000). Markets for Clean Air: The US Acid Rain Program. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enevoldsen, M. (2005). The Theory of Environmental Agreements and Taxes: CO2 Policy Performance in Comparative Perspective. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Enkvist, P., Nauclér, T. and Rosander, J. (2007). ‘A Cost Curve for Greenhouse Gas Reduction: A Global Study of the Size and Cost of Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Yields Important Insights for Businesses and Policy Makers’. McKinsey Quarterly, 1.Google Scholar
Espey, M. (1998). ‘Gasoline Demand Revisited: An International Meta-analysis of Elasticities’. Energy Economics, 20: 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,European Commission (1992). Proposal for a Council Directive Introducing a Tax on Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Energy. COM (92) 226 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
,European Commission (2005). Doing More with Less: Green Paper on Energy Efficiency. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
,European Commission (2006). Energy and Transport in Figures 2006. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
,European Commission (2007). Imposing a Unilateral Carbon Constraint on European Energy-intensive Industries and its Impact on their International Competitiveness: Data and Analysis. Brussels: Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs of the European Commission. Available at Scholar
,European Commission (2008a) Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying Document to the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to Improve and Extend the EU Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading System. Brussels. 23 January 2008.Google Scholar
,European Commission (2008b). Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and the Council on the Effort of Member States to Reduce their Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Meet the Community's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Commitments up to 2020. Presented by the Commission in January 2008.
,European Commission (2009a). Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to Improve and Extend the Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Scheme of the Community. Available at
,European Commission (2009b). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC.
,European Council (1996). Directive 96/61/EC: Concerning Integrated Pollution and Control. Brussels: IPPC Directive.Google Scholar
,European Energy Exchange (2010). EEX 2008 Figures. Leipzig: European Energy Exchange.Google Scholar
,European Investment Bank (2007). Evaluation of EIF Funding of Venture Capital Funds – EIB/ETF Mandate. Available at
,European Union (1992). Maastricht Treaty. European Union.Google Scholar
Felder, S. and Rutherford, T. F. (1993). ‘Unilateral CO2 Reductions and Carbon Leakage: The Consequences of International Trade in Oil and Basic Materials’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25: 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippini, M. (1999). ‘Swiss Residential Demand for Electricity’. Applied Economic Letters, 6(8): 533–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C. and Morgenstern, R. (2006). ‘Carbon Abatement Costs: Why the Wide Range of Estimates?’. Energy Journal, 27(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxon, T. J. (2003). Inducing Innovation for a Low-carbon Future: Drivers, Barriers and Policies. London: The Carbon Trust.Google Scholar
Fuss, M. A. (1977). ‘The Demand for Energy in Canadian Manufacturing’. Journal of Econometrics, 5.Google Scholar
Gallaway, M., McDaniel, C. and Rivera, S. (2003). ‘Short-run and Long-run Industry-level Estimates of US Armington Elasticities’. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 14(1): 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gboney, W. (2009). ‘Policy and Regulatory Framework for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Development in Ghana’. Climate Policy, 9: 508–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,GCI (1996). Draft Proposals for a Climate Change Protocol Based on Contraction and Convergence: A Contribution to Framework Convention on Climate Change. Ad Hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate, 6 September 1996.
Graham, D. and Glaister, S. (2002). Review of Income and Price Elasticities of Demand for Road Traffic. London: Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College.Google Scholar
Graichen, V., Schumacher, K., Matthes, F. C., Mohr, L., Duscha, V., Schleich, J. and Diekmann, J., 2008. Impacts of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme on the Industrial Competitiveness in Germany, Research Report 3707 41 501. UBA-FB 001177. Dessau-Rosslau: Umweltbundesamt.Google Scholar
Grant, K. (2009). ‘Concentrated Solar Power in South Africa’. Climate Policy, 9(5): 544–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, M. (2004a). ‘Technology Innovation and Climate Change Policy: An Overview of Issue and Options’. Keio Economic Studies, 41(2): 103–132.Google Scholar
Grubb, M. (2004b) ‘The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol’. In Owen, A. D. and Hanley, N. (eds), The Economics of Climate Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grubb, M., Chauis, T. and Ha-Duong, M. (1995). ‘The Economics of Changing Course: Implications of Adaptability and Inertia for Optimal Climate Policy’. Energy Policy, 23(4): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, M., Köhler, J. and Anderson, D. (2002). ‘Induced Technical Change in Energy and Environmental Modelling: Analytical Approaches and Policy Implications’. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27: 271–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, M. and Newbery, D. (2007). Pricing Carbon for Electricity Generation: National and International Dimensions. EPRG Working Paper 07/22. Cambridge: Electricity Policy Research Group.Google Scholar
Grubb, M. and Vigotti, R. (1997). Renewable Energy Strategies for Europe: Electricity Systems and Primary Energy Sources. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs Energy and Environmental Programme.Google Scholar
Guo, J., Hepburn, C. J., Tol, R. S. J. and Anthoff, D. (2006). ‘Discounting and the Social Cost of Carbon: A Closer Look at Uncertainty’. Environmental Science and Policy, 9: 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, K. and Kenber, M. (2006). Business Views on International Climate and Energy Policy. London: UK Business Council for Sustainable Energy.Google Scholar
Hammitt, J. K. (2000). ‘Are the Costs of Proposed Environmental Regulations Overestimated? Evidence from the CFC Phaseout’. Environmental and Resource Economics, 16: 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanly, M., Dargay, J. and Goodwin, P. (2002). Review of Income and Price Elasticities in the Demand for Road Traffic. Report 2002/13. ESRC Transport Studies Unit, Centre for Transport Studies, University College London.Google Scholar
Harrington, W., Morgenstern, R. D. and Nelson, P. (2000). ‘On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates’. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(2): 297–322.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. J. and Radov, D. B. (2002). Evaluation of Alternative Initial Allocation Mechanisms in a European Union Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowance Trading Scheme. National Economic Research Associates Report Prepared for DG Environment, European Commission.Google Scholar
Hassett, K. A. and Metcalf, G. E. (1993). ‘Energy Conservation Investment: Do Consumers Discount the Future Correctly?’. Energy Policy, 21(6): 710–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, G. and Morse, R. K. (2010). Making Carbon Offsets Work in the Developing World: Lessons from the Chinese Wind Controversy. Working Paper 90. Stanford Program on Energy and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Hekman, J. S. (1978). ‘An Analysis of the Changing Location of Iron and Steel Production in the Twentieth Century’. American Economic Review, 68(1): 123–133.Google Scholar
Helm, D., Hepburn, C. and Mash, R. (2003). ‘Credible Carbon Policy’. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(3): 438–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L. (1979). How Nations Behave. 2nd edn. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hepburn, C., Grubb, M., Neuhoff, K., Matthes, F. and Tse, M. (2006). ‘Auctioning of EU ETS Phase II Allowances: How and Why?’. Climate Policy (Special Issue: Emissions Allocation, Incentives and Industrial Competitiveness under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme), 6(1): 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,HMRC (2010). Research and Development (R&D) Relief for Corporation Tax. Available at August 2010.
Hoel, M. and Karp, L. (2001). ‘Taxes and Quotas for a Stock Pollutant with Multiplicative Uncertainty’. Journal of Public Economics, 82: 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffert, M. I., Caldeira, K., Jain, A. K., Haites, E. F., Harvey, L. D. D., Potter, S. D., Schlesinger, M. E., Schneider, S. H., Watts, R. G., Wigley, T. M. L. and Wuebbles, D. J. (1998). ‘Energy Implications of Future Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Content’. Nature, 395(6705): 881–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, C. and Newbery, D. (2008). ‘Calculating the Social Cost of Carbon’. In Grubb, M., Jamasb, T. and Pollitt, M. (eds), Delivering a Low Carbon Electricity System: Technologies, Economics and Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hourcade, J.-C., Demailly, D., Neuhoff, K. and Sato, M. (2007). Differentiation and Dynamics of EU ETS Industrial Competitiveness Impacts. Final Report. Cambridge: Climate Strategies.Google Scholar
,ICAP (2007). International Carbon Action Partnership. Berlin.
,IEA (2007). R&D Budget 2007. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
,IEA and OECD (2002). World Energy Outlook 2002. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
,IEA and OECD (2007). World Energy Outlook 2007: China and India Insights. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
,IEA and OECD (2009). World Energy Outlook 2009. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
,IISI (2007). A Policy to Reduce Steel-related Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Brussels: International Iron and Steel Institute Policy Statement.Google Scholar
Iliev, I. and Neuhoff, K. (2009). Intellectual Property: Cross-licensing, Patent Pools and Cooperative Standards as a Channel for Climate Change Technology Co-operation. Cambridge: Climate Strategies Paper September 2009. Available at Scholar
,IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ismer, R. and Neuhoff, K. (2006). Commitments through Financial Options: A Way to Facilitate Compliance with Climate Change Obligations. EPRG Working Paper: EPRG0625. Cambridge: Electricity Policy Research Group.Google Scholar
Ismer, R. and Neuhoff, K. (2007). ‘Border Tax Adjustments: A Feasible Way to Support Stringent Emission Trading’. European Journal of Law and Economics, 24: 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, H. D. and Ellerman, A. D. (2004). ‘The Safety Valve and Climate Policy’. Energy Policy, 32: 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquier-Roux, V. and Bourgeois, B. (2002). ‘New Networks of Technological Creation in Energy Industries: Reassessment of the Roles of Equipment Suppliers and Operators’. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 14(4): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jans, I. and Rosenbaum, D. I. (1997). ‘Multimarket Contact and Pricing: Evidence from the US Cement Industry’. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15: 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, S. G. (2004). ‘Reducing Costs of Emerging Renewable Energy Technologies: An Analysis of the Dynamic Development with Wind Power as Case Study’. International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy, 2(1/2): 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. T. (1996). ‘A Pooled Dynamic Analysis of Interfuel Substitution in Industrial Energy Demand by the G-7 Countries’. Applied Economics, 28: 815–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlson, S. H. (1983). ‘Modeling Location and Production: An Application to US Fully Integrated Steel Plants’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(1): 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnøe, P. (1990). ‘Technological Innovation and Industrial Organization in the Danish Wind Industry’. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2(2): 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemperer, P. (2002). ‘What Really Matters in Auction Design’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1): 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuik, O. and Gerlagh, R. (2003). ‘Trade Liberalization and Carbon Leakage’. Energy Journal, 24(3): 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cour, L. and Mollgaard, H. P. (2002). ‘Market Domination: Tests Applied to the Danish Cement Industry’. European Journal of Law and Economics, 14: 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labandeira, X. and Labeaga, J. (1999). ‘Combining Input-Output Analysis and Mirco-simulation to Assess the Effects of Carbon Taxation on Spanish Households’. Fiscal Studies, 20 (3): 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafferty, R., Hunger, D., Ballard, J., Mahrenholz, G., Mead, D. and Bandera, D. (2001). Demand Responsiveness in Electricity Markets. Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates. Washington, DC: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.Google Scholar
Lee, B., Iliev, I. and Preston, F. (2009). Who Owns Our Low Carbon Future?London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Lester, S. and Neuhoff, K. (2009). ‘Understanding the Roles of Policy Targets in National and International Governance’. Climate Policy, 9(5): 464–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, R. A. and Farr, R. K. (2003). ‘Collusion and Financial Leverage: An Analysis of the Integrated Mill Steel Industry’. Financial Management, Spring: 127–148.Google Scholar
Lundvall, B. (1992). ‘National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning’. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
MacKinnon, J. G. and Olewiler, N. D. (1980). ‘Disequilibrium Estimation of the Demand for Copper’. Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malach, V. W. (1957). ‘Elasticity of Demand for Canadian Exports’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(1): 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannaerts, H. J. B. M. (2000). ‘STREAM: Substance Throughput Related to Economic Activity Model’, Research Memorandum 165. The Hague: Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
Margolis, R. M. and Kammen, D. M. (1999). ‘Evidence of Under-investment in Energy R&D in the United States and the Impact of Federal Policy’. Energy Policy, 27: 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsiliani, L. and Renström, T. (2000). ‘Time Inconsistency in Environmental Policy: Tax Earmarking as a Commitment Solution’. Economic Journal, 462: 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K., Joskow, P. and Ellerman, D. (2007). Time and Location Differentiated NOX Control in Competitive Electricity Markets Using Cap-and-Trade Mechanisms. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research: Working Paper-2007–004.Google Scholar
Matthes, F. (2007). Zuteilungsgesetz 2008–2012 für den EU-Emissionshandel. Stellungnahme zu den Fragenkatalogen der Fraktionen CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP, DIE LINKE sowie BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN zur Anhörung des Ausschusses für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit des Deutschen Bundestages. Berlin.
Matthes, F. (2010a). Der Instrumenten-Mix einer ambitionierten Klimapolitik im Spannungsfeld von Emissionshandel und anderen Instrumenten. Freiburg: Öko-Institut.Google Scholar
Matthes, F. (2010b). Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading and Complementary Policies. Developing a Smart Mix for Ambitious Climate Policies, Report for German Environment Ministry, Berlin.Google Scholar
Matthes, F., Graichen, V., Harthan, R. O. and Repenning, J. (2006). Auswirkung verschiedener Allokationsregeln auf Investitionen im Strommarkt.
Matthes, F., Graichen, V. and Repenning, J. (2005). The Environmental Effectiveness and Economic Efficiency of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Structural Aspects of Allocation. WWF. Freiburg: Öko-Institut.Google Scholar
,McKinsey and Company (2010). Version 2.1 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve.
,McKinsey and Company and Ecofys (2006). Report on International Competitiveness. EU ETS Review.Google Scholar
Metcalf, G. (1999). ‘A Distributional Analysis of Green Tax Reforms’. National Tax Journal, 52(4): 655–682.Google Scholar
Michaelowa, A., Butzengeiger, S. and Jung, M. (2005). ‘Graduation and Deepening: An Ambitious Post-2012 Climate Policy Scenario’. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5(1): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, R. and Pizer, W. (2007). Reality Check: The Nature and Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Washington, DC. Resources for the Future Press.Google Scholar
Myers, S. (1984). ‘The Capital Structure Puzzle’. Journal of Finance (July): 595–562.Google Scholar
Nemet, G. F. and Baker, E. (2009). ‘Demand Subsidies Versus R&D: Comparing the Uncertain Impacts of Policy on a Pre-commercial Low-carbon Energy Technology’. Energy Journal, 30(4): 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhoff, K., Fankhauser, S., Guerin, E., Hourcade, J. C., Jackson, H., Rajan, R. and Ward, J. (2010). Structuring International Financial Support for Climate Change Mitigation in Developing Countries. DIW Working Paper Series. SSRN eLibrary. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW). Available at Scholar
Neuhoff, K., Ferrario, F., Grubb, M., Gabel, E. and Keats, K. (2006). ‘Emission Projections 2008–2012 versus National Allocation Plans II’. Climate Policy, 6(4): 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhoff, K., Keats, K. and Sato, M. (2006). ‘Allocation, Incentives and Distortions: The Impact of EU ETS Emissions Allowance Allocations to the Electricity Sector’. Climate Policy, 6(1): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhoff, K., Lossen, J., Nemet, G., Sato, M. and Schumacher, K. (2007). ‘The Role of the Supply Chain for Innovation: The Example of Photovoltaic Solar Cells’. EPRG Working Paper 07/32. Cambridge: Electricity Policy Research Group.
Neuhoff, K., Rogge, K., Schleich, J., Sijm, J., Tuerk, A., Kettner, C., Walker, N., Åhman, M., Betz, R., Cludius, J., Ferrario, F., Holmgren, K., Pal, G., Grubb, M. and Matthes, F. (2006). ‘Implications of Announced Phase 2 National Allocation Plans for the EU ETS’. Climate Policy, 6(5): 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhoff, K. and Vasa, A. (2010). The Role of CDM Post-2012. Cambridge: Climate Strategies Working Paper.Google Scholar
Newbery, D. M. G. (2003). ‘Sectoral Dimensions of Sustainable Development: Energy and Transport’. Economic Survey of Europe, 2: 73–93.Google Scholar
Newbery, D. M. G. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1981). The Theory of Commodity Price Stabilization: A Study in the Economics of Risk. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Newell, R. and Pizer, W. (2003). ‘Regulating Stock Externalities Under Uncertainty’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45: 416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R., Pizer, W. and Zhang, J. (2005). ‘Managing Permit Markets to Stabilize Prices’. Environmental and Resource Economics, 31(2): 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norberg-Bohm, V. (2000). ‘Creating Incentives for Environmentally Enhancing Technological Change: Lessons from Thirty Years of US Energy Technology’. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65: 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2006). ‘After Kyoto: Alternative Mechanisms to Control Global Warming’. American Economic Review, 96(2): 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, I. (2004). ‘Are Emissions Permits Regressive?’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47: 364–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A., Burtraw, D. and Palmer, K. L. (2010). ‘Compensation for Electricity Consumers Under a US CO2 Emissions Cap’. In Ghosal, Vivek (ed.), Reforming Rules and Regulations. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Pershing, J. and Tudela, F. (2004). ‘A Long-term Target: Framing the Climate Effort’. In Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change: 11–36.Google Scholar
Philibert, C. (2000). ‘How Emissions Trading Could Benefit Developing Countries’. Energy Policy, 28: 947–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philibert, C.(2004). Technology Innovation, Development and Diffusion. OECD and IEA Information Paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT.Google Scholar
Philibert, C. and Reinaud, J. (2004). Emissions Trading: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT, OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pizer, W. A. (2002). ‘Combining Price and Quantity Controls to Mitigate Global Climate Change’. Journal of Public Economics, 85(3): 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizer, W. A. and Kopp, R. J. (2005). ‘Calculating the Costs of Environmental Regulation’. In Maler, K.-G. and Vincent, J. R., Handbook of Environmental Economics. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 1308–1344.Google Scholar
Poterba, J. M. (1991). ‘Tax Policy to Combat Global Warming: On Designing a Carbon Tax’. In Dornbusch, R. and Poterba, J. M. (eds), Global Warming: Economic Policy Responses to Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Reedman, L., Graham, P. and Coombes, P. (2006). ‘Using a Real-Options Approach to Model Technology Adoption Under Carbon Price Uncertainty: An Application to the Australian Electricity Generation Sector’. Economic Record, 82(1): 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinaud, J. (2003). Emissions Trading and its Possible Impacts on Investment Decisions in the Power Sector. Paris: IEA Information Paper.Google Scholar
Reinaud, J. (2004). Emissions Trading and its Possible Impacts: The Case of Energy-intensive Industries in the EU ETS. ET Workshop 5 October 2004.Google Scholar
Roller, L.-H. and Steen, F. (2005). ‘On the Workings of a Cartel: Evidence from the Norwegian Cement Industry’. American Economic Review, 96: 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendahl, K. (2004). ‘Cost-effective Environmental Policy: Implications of Induced Technological Change’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(3): 1099–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, S. (2005). The Costs of Environmental Regulation in a Concentrated Industry. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Centre for Energy and Environmental Policy Research05–010.Google Scholar
Sagar, A., Bremner, C. and Grubb, M. (2008). ‘Public–Private Roles and Partnership for Innovation and Technology Transfer’. In Climate Change: Technology Development and Technology Transfer. UN Department of Economics and Social Affairs. Available at Scholar
Samaniego, J. and Figueres, C. (2002). ‘Evolving to a Sector-based Clean Development Mechanism’. In Baumert, K., Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for Protecting the Climate. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Sandén, B. A. and Azar, C. (2005). ‘Near-term Technology Policies for Long-Term Climate Targets: Economy Wide Versus Technology Specific Approaches’. Energy Policy, 33(12): 1557–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, G. (1979). ‘The Demand for Newsprint: A Comment’. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'Economique, 12(3): 518–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiell, L. (2003). ‘Equity and Efficiency in International Markets for Pollution Permits’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46: 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijm, J. P. M., Kuik, O. J., Patel, M., Oikonomou, V., Worrell, E., Lako, P., Annevelink, E., Nabuurs, G. J. and Elbersen, H. W. (2004). Spillovers of Climate Policy: An Assessment of the Incidence of Carbon Leakage and Induced Technological Change due to CO2 Abatement Measures. Report 500036 002 (ECN report ECN-C–05–014). Bailrigg: ECN.Google Scholar
Sijm, J. P. M., Neuhoff, K. and Chen, Y. (2006). ‘CO2 Cost Pass Through and Windfall Profits in the Power Sector’. Climate Policy, 6(1): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sippel, M. and Neuhoff, K. (2009). ‘Lessons from Conditionality Provisions for South-North Co-operation on Climate Policy’. Climate Policy, 9(5): 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeers, Y. (2007). Assessment of CO2 Regulations. IFRI Energy Breakfast Roundtable Brussels.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (1992). ‘The Distributional Consequences of Taxes on Energy and the Carbon Content of Fuels’. European Economy, Special Edition 1 (1992).Google Scholar
Smith, S. and Swierzbinski, J. (2007). ‘Assessing the Performance of the UK Emissions Trading Scheme’. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1): 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, B. (1995). ‘Global CO2 Emissions Trading: Early Lessons from the US Acid Rain Program’. Climatic Change, 30(1): 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorrell, S. (2007). ‘The Rebound Effect: An Assessment of the Evidence for Economy-wide Energy Savings from Improved Energy Efficiency’. Report of UK Energy Research Centre.
Spierer, C. (1988). Modélisation économétrique et perspectives à la long terme de la demande d'énergie en Suisse. Bern: Expertengruppe Energieszenarien, Schriftenreihe Nr. 17.Google Scholar
Sreenivasamurthy, U. (2009). ‘Domestic Climate Policy for the Indian Steel Sector’. Climate Policy, 9(5): 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Standard & Poor's (2009). Drax Power Ltd. Issuer Rating Cut to ‘BB +’ On Weak UK Power Prices and Increasing Business Risk. Outlook Negative (Ratings Direct).
,Standard & Poor's (2010). European Companies Look to Carbon Markets and Reduction Measures to Manage their Emissions Exposure(Global Credit Portal).Google Scholar
Steinbuks, J. and Neuhoff, K. (2010). Operational and Investment Response to Energy Prices in the OECD Manufacturing Sector. Cambridge Working Paper in Economics1015.Google Scholar
Sterk, W. and Wittneben, B. (2005). Addressing Opportunities and Challenges of a Sectoral Approach to the Clean Development Mechanism. JIKO Policy Paper 1/2005. Berlin: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.Google Scholar
,Stern Review (2006). The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Symons, E., Proops, J. and Gay, G. (1994). ‘Carbon Taxes, Consumer Demand and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Simulation Analysis for the UK’. Fiscal Studies, 15 (2): 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, E., Speck, S. and Proops, J. (2002). ‘The Distributional Effects of Carbon and Energy Taxes: The Cases of France, Spain, Italy, Germany and the UK’. European Environment Agency, 12: 200–212.Google Scholar
Tol, R. S. J. (2003). The Marginal Cost of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Assessment of the Uncertainties. Working Paper FNU 19. University of Hamburg, Centre for Marine and Climate Research.Google Scholar
,UNEP (2009), Catalysing Low-carbon Growth in Developing Economies: Public Finance Mechanisms to Scale Up Private Sector Investment in Climate Solutions. London: Vivid Economics. October.Google Scholar
,UNEP Risoe (2010). UNEP Risoe CDM/JI Pipeline Analysis and Database. Available at
,UNFCCC (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Adopted by Consensus at the Third Session of the Conference of the Parties (COP3).
,UNFCCC (1999). Report on the In-depth Review of the Second National Communication of Germany. FCCC/IDR.2/DEU 24.Google Scholar
,UNFCCC (2009a). Chairs Proposed Draft Text on the Outcome of the ad hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. Available at
,UNFCCC(2009b). Recommendations on Future Financing Options for Enhancing the Development, Deployment, Diffusion and Transfer of Technologies under the Convention. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Available at
,UNFCCC (2009c). Negotiating Text. Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Co-operation Action under the Convention. Sixth Session. Bonn. 1.12 June 2009. Available at
,US Senate (1993). Government Performance and Result Act. Senate and House of Representatives of the United States. Washington, DC.
Zeben, J. A. (2009). ‘The European Emissions Trading Scheme Case Law’. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 18(2): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasa, A. (2010). Implementing CDM Limits in the EU ETS: A Law and Economics Approach. DIW Working Paper Series. SSRN eLibrary. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW). Available at Scholar
Walker, N. (2006). Concrete Evidence? An Empirical Approach to Quantify the Impact of EU Emission Trading on Cement Industry Competitiveness. School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin Working Paper.Google Scholar
Walker, N. and Richardson, M. (2006). Developing National Standards for Durability, Performance and Environmental Sustainability of Concrete: An Irish Case Study Illustrating the Potential for ‘Win-Win’. University College Dublin Working Paper.Google Scholar
Ward, M. (2010). Engaging Private Sector Capital at Scale in Financing Low Carbon Infrastructure in Developing Countries. Wellington: GtripleC. Scholar
Weber, T. and Neuhoff, K. (2010). ‘Carbon Markets and Technological Innovation’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(2): 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, M., Paltsev, S. and Reilly, J. (2006). The Value of Emissions Trading. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. L. (1974). ‘Prices vs. Quantities’. Review of Economic Studies, 41(4): 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wier, M., Birr-Pedersen, K., Jacobsen, H. and Klok, J. (2005). ‘Are CO2 Taxes Regressive? Evidence from the Danish Experience’. Ecological Economics, 52: 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, H. (2007). Long-term Mitigation Scenarios: Technical Report. Prepared for Department of Environment Affairs and Tourism South Africa. Energy Research Centre.Google Scholar
Winkler, H., Brouns, B. and Kartha, S. (2006). ‘Future Mitigation Commitments: Differentiating among Non-Annex I Countries’. Climate Policy, 5(5): 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. A. (1995). ‘Liberalizing European Steel Trade’. European Economic Review, 39: 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,World Bank (2006). Clean Energy and Development: Towards an Investment Framework. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
,World Bank (2008). Global Economic Prospects 2008: Technology Diffusion in the Developing World. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yang, M. and Blyth, W. (2007). Modeling Investment Risks and Uncertainties with Real Options Approach. Paris: IEA Working Paper Series LTO/2007/WP 01.Google Scholar
Zeppezauer, C. (2009). China is the World's Leading Host for Clean Development Mechanism Projects. Business Forum China. Scholar
Zhang, Z. X. (1998). ‘Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading and the World Trading System’. Journal of World Trade, 32(5): 219–239.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Karsten Neuhoff
  • Book: Climate Policy after Copenhagen
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI:
Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Karsten Neuhoff
  • Book: Climate Policy after Copenhagen
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI:
Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Karsten Neuhoff
  • Book: Climate Policy after Copenhagen
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI:
Available formats