Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-45s75 Total loading time: 0.819 Render date: 2021-12-09T14:44:24.658Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

A. W. Carus
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought
Explication as Enlightenment
, pp. 310 - 339
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

d'Alembert, J. L. (1751) Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, trans. by R. N. Schwab (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Ash, M. G. (1998) Gestalt Psychology in German Culture 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Aufmuth, U. (1979) Die deutsche Wandervogelbewegung unter soziologischem Aspekt (Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Awodey, S. and Carus, A. W. (2001) ‘Carnap, Completeness, and Categoricity: The Gabelbarkeitssatz of 1928’, Erkenntnis 54, pp. 145–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awodey, S. and A. W. Carus (2003) ‘Carnap vs. Gödel on Syntax and Tolerance’, in Parrini, P., Salmon, W. C., and Salmon, M. H., eds., Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press), pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
Awodey, S. and A. W. Carus (2004) ‘How Carnap Could Have Replied to Gödel’, in Awodey and Klein (2004), pp. 199–220.
Awodey, S. and A. W. Carus (2007) ‘The Turning Point: Philosophy of Mathematics in Logical Empiricism from the Tractatus to Logical Syntax ’, in Richardson, A. and Uebel, T., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 165–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awodey, S. and Carus, A. W. (forthcoming) ‘Carnap's Dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical Syntax ’, in Synthese.Google Scholar
Awodey, S. and Klein, C., eds. (2004) Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena (LaSalle, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar
Awodey, S. and Reck, E. (2002) ‘Completeness and Categoricity. Part I: Nineteenth-century Axiomatics to Twentieth-Century Metalogic’, History and Philosophy of Logic 23, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1937) ‘Verification and Experience’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 37, pp. 137–56.CrossRef
Ayer, A. J. (1982) Philosophy in the Twentieth Century (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. (1934) Le Nouvel Esprit scientifique (Paris: Alcan).Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. (1938) La Formation de l'esprit scientifique: Contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance objective (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar
Baker, K. M. (1975) Condorcet: From Natural Philosophy to Social Mathematics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Banks, E. C. (2005) ‘Kant, Herbart, and Riemann’, Kant-Studien 96, pp. 208–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauch, B. (1911) Studien zur Philosophie der exakten Wissenschaften (Heidelberg: Winter).Google Scholar
Beaney, M. (1996) Frege: Making Sense (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Beaney, M. (2004) ‘Carnap's Conception of Explication: From Frege to Husserl?’ in Awodey and Klein (2004), pp. 117–50.
Beeck, K.-H. (1975) Friedrich Wilhelm Dörpfeld: Anpassung im Zwiespalt (Neuwied: Luchterhand).Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1993) Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise (LaSalle, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1973) ‘J. L. Austin and the Early Beginnings of Oxford Philosophy’, repr. in Personal Impressions, 2nd edn (London: Pimlico, 1998), pp. 130–45.Google Scholar
Beth, E. W. (1963) ‘Carnap's Views on the Advantages of Constructed Systems over Natural Languages in the Philosophy of Science’, in Schilpp (1963), pp. 469–502.Google Scholar
Bias-Engels, S. (1988) Zwischen Wandervogel und Wissenschaft: Zur Geschichte von Jugendbewegung und Studentenschaft 1896–1920 (Cologne: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik).Google Scholar
Bird, G. H. (1995) ‘Carnap and Quine: Internal and External Questions’, Erkenntnis 42, pp. 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, G. H. (2006) The Revolutionary Kant: A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason (LaSalle, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar
Blakeslee, S. (2003) ‘Moved by Thought’, The New York Times, Science Pages, (13 October 2003).Google Scholar
Blaug, M. (1980) The Methodology of Economics, or How Economists Explain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Bloor, D. (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Bloor, D. (1996) Wittgenstein, Rules, and Institutions (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Bohnert, H. G. (1975a) ‘Homage to Rudolf Carnap, 10’, in Hintikka, J., ed., Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. XXⅪ–XⅬIV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohnert, H. G. (1975b) ‘Carnap's Logicism’, in Hintikka, J., ed., Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltzmann, L. (1896) ‘Ein Wort der Mathematik an die Energetik’, Annalen der Physik und Chemie 57, pp. 39–71.
Bonner, J. T. (1983) The Evolution of Culture in Animals (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. (1994) Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. (1999) Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Bruford, W. H. (1975) The German Tradition of Self-Cultivation: Bildung from Humboldt to Thomas Mann (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Burge, T. (1992) ‘Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1950–1990’, Philosophical Review 101, pp. 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burling, R. (2006) The Talking Ape: How Language Evolved (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1922) Der Raum: Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftslehre, Kant-Studien Ergänzungshefte, Nr. 56 (Berlin: Reuther & Reichard).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1923) ‘Über die Aufgabe der Physik und die Anwendung des Grundsatzes der Einfachstheit’, Kant-Studien 28, pp. 90–107.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1924) ‘Dreidimensionalität des Raumes und Kausalität: Eine Untersuchung über den logischen Zusammenhang zweier Fiktionen’, Annalen der Philosophie und philosophischen Kritik 4, pp. 105–30.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1926) Physikalische Begriffsbildung (Karlsruhe: Braun).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1927) ‘Eigentliche und uneigentliche Begriffe’, Symposion 1, pp. 355–74.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. ([Box 4, CM 13, item 5 ‘Welchen Sinn hat die Wahrscheinlichkeitsaussage über ein künftiges Ereignis? [zu. S. 26]’ (typed table), 20 November [1928]. This table appears to have been enclosed in a letter to Kaila of 28 January 1929.) Der logische Aufbau der Welt (Berlin: Weltkreis).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1928b) Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie (Berlin: Weltkreis).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1929) Abriß der Logistik, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Relationstheorie und ihrer Anwendungen (Vienna: Springer).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. ([Box 4, CM 13, item 7] ‘Über die Naturgesetze als Operationsvorschriften (Kon-stitutionsregeln) [Gespräch mit Feigl]’, 2 August 1930.) ‘Die alte und die neue Logik’, Erkenntnis 1, pp. 12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. ([Box 4, CM 13, item 1] ‘Plan für Kaila-Aufsatz: Über die Erkenntnis des sog. “Nicht-Gegebenen”’ (shorthand), 2 November 1930; also an outline headed ‘Kaila-Aufsatz’ on a separate sheet dated 29 October 1930.) Review of Kaufmann (1930), Deutsche Literaturzeitung 51, cols. 1674–8.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. ([Box 3, CM 10, loose sheet] ‘Einführung in die wissenschaftliche Philosophie: [alter] Plan’ (shorthand), 18 November 1930.) ‘Bericht über Untersuchungen zur allgemeinen Axiomatik’, Erkenntnis 1, pp. 303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1930d) Review of Kaila (1930), Erkenntnis 2, pp. 75–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1931) ‘Die logizistische Grundlegung der Mathematik’, Erkenntnis 2, pp. 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1932a) ‘Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache’, Erkenntnis 2, pp. 219–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1932b) ‘Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft’, Erkenntnis 2, pp. 432–65, trans. M. Black as Unity of Science (London: Routledge, 1934).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1932c) ‘Psychologie in physikalischer Sprache’, Erkenntnis 3, pp. 107–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1932d) ‘Erwiderung auf die vorstehenden Aufsätze von E. Zilsel und K. Duncker’, Erkenntnis 3, pp. 177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1932e) ‘Über Protokollsätze’, Erkenntnis 3, pp. 215–28; trans. R. Creath and R. Nollan as ‘On Protocol Sentences’, Nous 21 (1987), pp. 457–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934a) Logische Syntax der Sprache (Vienna: Springer), trans. Amethe Smeaton as The Logical Syntax of Language (London: Routledge, 1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934b) ‘Theoretische Fragen und praktische Entscheidungen’, Natur und Geist 2, pp. 257–60.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934c) Die Aufgabe der Wissenschaftslogik (Vienna: Gerold), trans. H. Kaal as ‘The Task of the Logic of Science’, in McGuinness, B., ed., Unified Science: The Vienna Circle Monograph Series (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987), pp. 46–66.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934d) ‘On the Character of Philosophical Problems’, Philosophy of Science 1, pp. 5–19; German original ‘Über den Charakter philosophischer Probleme’ published in Carnap, R., Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie und andere metaphysikkritische Schriften, ed. Mormann, T. (Hamburg: Meiner, 2004), pp. 111–27.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1935a) Philosophy and Logical Syntax (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1935b) Review of Popper (1935), Erkenntnis 5, pp. 290–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1936) ‘Wahrheit und Bewährung’, in Actes du Congrès international de philosophie scientifique, Sorbonne, Paris 1935, fasc. 4. Unité de la science (Paris: Hermann), pp. 18–23.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1936–7) ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science 3, pp. 419–71 and 4, pp. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1939) Foundations of Logic and Mathematics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1942) Introduction to Semantics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1945) ‘The Two Concepts of Probability’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5, pp. 513–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950a) ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’, repr. in his Meaning and Necessity, 2nd edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), pp. 205–21.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950b) Logical Foundations of Probability (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1955) ‘On Some Concepts of Pragmatics’, Philosophical Studies 6 (1955), pp. 89–91, repr. in Meaning and Necessity, 2nd edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), pp. 249–51.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1956) ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts’, in Feigl, H. and Scriven, M., eds., The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 38–76.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1961) ‘Vorwort zur Zweiten Auflage’, in Carnap (1928), 2nd edn (Hamburg: Meiner), pp. X–XV.
Carnap, R. (1963) ‘Carnap's Intellectual Autobiography’ and ‘The Philosopher Replies’, in Schilpp (1963), pp. 3–84, 859–1013.
Carnap, R. (1966) Philosophical Foundations of Physics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1968) ‘Inductive Logic and Inductive Intuition’, in Lakatos, I., ed., The Problem of Inductive Logic (Amsterdam: North Holland).Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (2000) Untersuchungen zur allgemeinen Axiomatik, ed. Bonk, T. and Mosterin, J. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (2004) ‘Causation: One Word, Many Things’, Philosophy of Science 71, pp. 805–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N., Cat, J., Fleck, L., and Uebel, T. E. (1996) Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carus, A. W. (1999) ‘Carnap, Syntax, and Truth’, in Peregrin, J., ed., Truth and its Nature (If Any) (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carus, A. W. (2001) ‘The Philosopher without Qualities’, review article of T. Mormann (1999) and R. Carnap (2000), in Heidelberger, M. and Stadler, F., eds., History of Philosophy and Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 369–77.Google Scholar
Carus, A. W. (2002) ‘Moral Expertise’, in Smith, B., ed., Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (Chicago and LaSalle, IL: Open Court), pp. 175–222.Google Scholar
Carus, A. W. (2004) ‘Sellars, Carnap, and the Logical Space of Reasons’, in Awodey and Klein (2004), pp. 313–52.
Carus, A. W. (forthcoming) ‘On Carnap's Logic of Normative Statements’.
Carus, A. W. and Ogilvie, S. C. (forthcoming) ‘Turning Qualitative into Quantitative Evidence: A Well-Used Method Made Explicit’, Economic History Review (longer version available online as Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 0512, Faculty of Economics and Politics, University of Cambridge).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1907) ‘Kant und die moderne Mathematik’, Kant-Studien 12, pp. 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1910) Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff: Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1994), trans. W. C. and M. C. Swabey as Substance and Function and Einstein's Theory of Relativity (LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1923).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1912) ‘Hermann Cohen und die Erneuerung der Kantischen Philosophie’, Kant-Studien 17, pp. 252–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1922) Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, vol. 2, 3rd edn (repr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1994).
Cassirer, E. (1927) ‘Erkenntnistheorie nebst den Grenzfragen der Logik und Denkpsychologie’, repr. in Cassirer, E., Erkenntnis, Begriff, Kultur (Hamburg: Meiner, 1993) pp. 77–154.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1929) ‘Formen und Formwandlungen des philosophischen Wahrheitsbegriffs’, inaugural lecture at the University of Hamburg on 7 November 1929, repr. in Cassirer, E., Geist und Leben: Schriften zu den Lebensordnungen von Natur und Kunst, Geschichte und Sprache (Leipzig: Reclam, 1993) pp. 193–217.Google Scholar
Ceynowa, K. (1993) Zwischen Pragmatismus und Fiktionalismus: Hans Vaihingers ‘Philosophie des Als Ob’ (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann).Google Scholar
Coffa, A. (1991) The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, H. (1871) Kants Theorie der Erfahrung (Berlin: Dümmler).Google Scholar
Cohen, H. (1885) Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, 2nd edn (Berlin: Dümmler).Google Scholar
Coleman, D. C. (1977) The Economy of England, 1450–1750 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Comte, A. (1822) Plan des travaux scientifiques nécessaires pour réorganiser la société, trans. ed. Ostwald, W. as Entwurf der wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten, welche für eine Reorganisation der Gesellschaft erforderlich sind (Leipzig: Unesma, 1914).Google Scholar
Creath, R. (1996) ‘The Unity of Science: Carnap, Neurath, and Beyond’, in Galison and Stump (1996).
Dahms, H.-J. (1994) Positivismusstreit: Die Auseinandersetzungen der Frankfurter Schule mit dem logischen Positivismus, dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus und dem kritischen Realismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Dahms, H.-J. (2004) ‘Neue Sachlichkeit in the Architecture and Philosophy of the 1920s’, in Awodey and Klein (2004), pp. 353–72.
Danto, A. (1995) ‘The Decline and Fall of the Analytical Philosophy of History’, in Ankersmit, F. A. and Kellner, H., eds., A New Philosophy of History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
Dedekind, R. (1887) Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? (Braunschweig: Vieweg).Google Scholar
Deltete, R. (1999) ‘Helm and Boltzmann: Energetics at the Lübeck Naturforscherversammlung’, Synthese 119, pp. 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denker, A., ed. (2002) M. Heidegger and Rickert, H., Briefe 1912–1933 and andere Dokumente (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann).Google Scholar
Dingler, H. (1919) Die Grundlagen der Physik: Synthetische Prinzipien der mathematischen Naturphilosophie (Berlin and Leipzig: Vereinigung wissenschaftlicher Verleger).Google Scholar
DiSalle, R. (1992) ‘Helmholtz's Empiricist Philosophy of Mathematics: Between Laws of Perception and Laws of Nature’, in Cahan, D., ed., Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press), pp. 461–97.Google Scholar
DiSalle, R. (2006) Understanding Space-Time: The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörpfeld, F. W. (1963) Ausgewählte pädagogische Schriften, ed. Albert, Reble (Paderborn: Schöningh).Google Scholar
Dray, W. (2000) ‘Explanation in History’, in Fetzer, J. H., ed., Science, Explanation, and Rationality: The Philosophy of C. G. Hempel (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 217–42.Google Scholar
Driesch, H. (1913) Die Logik als Aufgabe (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck).
Dubois-Reymond, E. (1872) ‘Über die Grenzen des Naturerkennens’, repr. in Reden von Emil Dubois-Reymond, 2nd edn (Leipzig: Veit, 1912), vol. 1, pp. 441–72.Google Scholar
Dubois-Reymond, E. (1880) ‘Die sieben Welträtsel’, repr. in Reden von Emil Dubois-Reymond, 2nd edn (Leipzig: Veit, 1912), vol. 2, pp. 65–98.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1963) ‘Realism’, repr. in Truth and other Enigmas (London: Duckworth, 1978), pp. 145–65.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1973) ‘The Significance of Quine's Indeterminacy Thesis’, repr. in Truth and other Enigmas (London: Duckworth, 1978), pp. 375–416.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1981) Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1991) Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1993) ‘Realism and Anti-Realism’, in The Seas of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 462–78.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. (1993) The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1992) ‘Carnap, Kuhn, and the Philosophy of Scientific Methodology’, in Horwich, P., ed., World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 9–36.Google Scholar
Ebbs, G. (1997) Rule-Following and Realism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1916) ‘Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik 49, pp. 769–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1921) Geometrie und Erfahrung (Berlin: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, R. (1910) Geschichte des Monismus (Leipzig: Kröner).
Elias, N. (1939) Über den Prozess der Zivilisation: Soziogenetische und phylogenetische Untersuchungen (repr. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997).Google Scholar
Elias, N. (1989) Studien über die Deutschen: Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Erdmann, B. (1921) Die Philosophischen Grundlagen von Helmholtz' Wahrnehmungstheorie (Berlin: Verlag Akademie der Wissenschaften).Google Scholar
Ewald, O. (1912) ‘Die deutsche Philosophie im Jahre 1911’, Kant-Studien 17, pp. 382–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigl, H. (1929) Theorie und Erfahrung in der Physik (Karlsruhe: Braun).Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1943) ‘Logical Empiricism’, in Runes, D. D., ed., Twentieth-Century Philosophy (New York: Philosophical Library), repr. in Feigl, H. and Sellars, W., eds., Readings in Philosophical Analysis (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1963) ‘Physicalism, Unity of Science, and the Foundations of Psychology’, in Schilpp (1963), pp. 227–68.
Feynman, R. (1985) QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Flitner, A. and Wittig, J., eds. (2000) Optik – Technik – Soziale Kultur: Siegfried Czapski, Weggefährte und Nachfolger Ernst Abbes (Rudolstadt: Hain).Google Scholar
Flitner, W. (1986) Erinnerungen, 1889–1945 (Paderborn: Schoeningh).Google Scholar
Frank, P. (1907) ‘Kausalgesetz und Erfahrung’, Annalen der Naturphilosophie 6, pp. 443–50.
Frank, P. (1949) Modern Science and Its Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Franklin, A. (1986) The Neglect of Experiment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, A. (2002) Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
Frawley, W. (1997) Vygotsky and Cognitive Science: Language and the Unification of the Social and Computational Mind (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, G. (1879) Begriffsschrift; Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens (Halle: Nebert), repr. in G. Frege Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze (Hildesheim: Olms, 1964).Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1881) ‘Booles rechnende Logik und die Begriffsschrift’, in G. Frege, Nachgelassene Schriften, ed. Hermes, H., Kambartel, F., and Kaulbach, F. (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1969).Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1882) ‘Über die wissenschaftliche Berechtigung einer Begriffsschrift’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 81, repr. in Frege, G., Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze (Hildesheim: Olms, 1964).Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1884) Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl, repr. 1986 (Hamburg: Meiner), pp. 9–52.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1918) ‘Der Gedanke’, repr. in Frege, G., Logische Untersuchungen, ed. Patzig, G. (Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, 1966), pp. 30–53.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1924/5) ‘Erkenntnisquellen der Mathematik und der mathematischen Naturwissenschaften’, in Frege, G., Nachgelassene Schriften, ed. Hermes, H., Kambartel, F., and Kaulbach, F. (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1969), pp. 286–94.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1992) Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1996) ‘Exorcising the Philosophical Tradition: Comments on John McDowell's Mind and World ’, Philosophical Review 105, pp. 427–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1997) ‘Helmholtz's Zeichentheorie and Schlick's Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre : Early Logical Empiricism and its Nineteenth-Century Background’, Philosophical Topics 25, pp. 19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1999) Reconsidering Logical Positivism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (2000) A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, Heidegger (LaSalle, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2001) Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University (Palo Alto, CA: CSLI Publications).Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2002) ‘Geometry as a Branch of Physics: Background and Context for Einstein's “Geometry and Experience”’, in Malament, D., ed., Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics (LaSalle, IL: Open Court), pp. 193–229.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2003) ‘Kuhn and Logical Empiricism’, in T. Nickels, ed., Thomas Kuhn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 19–44.
Friedman, M. (2006) ‘Kant – Naturphilosophie – Electromagnetism’, in Friedman, M. and Nordman, A., eds., The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 51–79.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2007) ‘The Aufbau and the Rejection of Metaphysics’, in R. Creath and M. Friedman, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Carnap (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Friedman, M. (forthcoming) ‘Carnap and Quine: Twentieth-Century Echoes of Kant and Hume’, Howard Stein Lecture at the University of Chicago (2006). To be published in Philosophical Topics .
Gabriel, G. (2001) ‘Existenz- und Zahlaussage: Herbart und Frege’, in Hoeschen, A. and Schneider, L., eds., Herbarts Kultursystem: Perspektiven der Transdisziplinarität im 19. Jahrhundert (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann), pp. 149–62, trans. Erich Reck as ‘Existential and Number Statements: Herbart and Frege’, in Beaney, M. and Reck, E., eds., Gottlob Frege: Critical Assessment of Leading Philosophers, vol. 1 (London: Routledge, 2005), pp. 109–23.Google Scholar
Gabriel, G. (2004) ‘Introduction: Carnap Brought Home’, in Awodey and Klein (2004), pp. 1–21.
Galilei, G. (1644) The Assayer, in Drake, S., ed., Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo (New York: Doubleday, 1957).Google Scholar
Galison, P. (1996) ‘Constructing Modernism: The Cultural Location of Aufbau ’, in Giere, R. N. and Richardson, A. W., eds., Origins of Logical Empiricism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 17–44.Google Scholar
Galison, P. and Stump, D. J., eds. (1996) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Gay, P. (1968) Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Geach, P. (1983) ‘Wittgenstein's Operator N ’, Analysis 41, pp. 573–89.Google Scholar
Giere, R. N. (1999) Science Without Laws (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Giere, R. N. and Richardson, A. W., eds. (1996) The Origins of Logical Empiricism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
Gillispie, C. G. (2004) Science and Polity in France: The Revolutionary and Napoleonic Years (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1930) ‘Vortrag über die Vollständigkeit des Funktionenkalküls’, in Gödel, K., Collected Works, vol. 3 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 16–23.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1953/9) ‘Is Mathematics Syntax of Language?’ in Gödel, K., Collected Works, vol. 3 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 334–63.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (2003) Collected Works, vol. 4: Correspondence A-G (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Goessler, P. (1951) Wilhelm Dörpfeld: Ein Leben im Dienst der Antike (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer).Google Scholar
Goldfarb, W. (1979) ‘Logic in the Twenties: The Nature of the Quantifier’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 44, pp. 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, W. (1988) ‘Poincaré against the Logicists’, in Aspray, W. and Kitcher, P., eds., History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 61–81.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, W. (1996) ‘The Philosophy of Mathematics in Early Positivism’, in Giere, R. N. and Richarson, A. W., eds., Origins of Logical Empiricism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 213–30.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, W. (1997) ‘Semantics in Carnap: A Rejoinder to Alberto Coffa’, Philosophical Topics 25, pp. 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, W. (2003) ‘Introduction’ to Gödel's Correspondence with Carnap, in Gödel (2003).
Goldfarb, W. (2005) ‘On Gödel's Way In’, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11, pp. 185–93.
Gregory, R. L. (1998) Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing, 5th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1968a) Erkenntnis und Interesse (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1968b) Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’ (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1981) Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1985) Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1988) Nachmetaphysisches Denken: Philosophische Aufsätze (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1995) ‘Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism’, Journal of Philosophy 92, pp. 109–31.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996) ‘“Vernünftig” versus “Wahr” oder die Moral der Weltbilder’, in J. Habermas Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp), pp. 95–127.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1999) Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung: Philosophische Aufsätze (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2000) ‘Nach dreißig Jahren: Bemerkungen zu Erkenntnis und Interesse ’, in Müller-Dohm, S., ed., Das Interesse der Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit ‘Erkenntnis und Interesse’ (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp), pp. 12–20.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. (1899) Die Welträtsel (Leipzig: Kröner), trans. J. McCabe as The Riddle of the Universe at the Close of the Nineteenth Century (New York: Harper 1902).Google Scholar
Hahn, H. (1929) ‘Empirismus, Mathematik, Logik’, repr. in Hahn, H., Empirismus, Logik, Mathematik (Frankfurt am M: Suhrkamp), pp. 55–8, trans. H. Kaal as ‘Empiricism, Mathematics, and Logic’, in McGuinness, B., ed., Empiricism, Logic, and Mathematics: Philosophical Papers (Dordrecht: Reidel 1980), pp. 39–42.Google Scholar
Hahn, H., R. Carnap, and O. Neurath (1929) Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis (Vienna), repr. in Neurath, O., Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung, Sozialismus und logischer Empirismus, ed. Hegselmann, R. (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp), pp. 81–101; trans. P. Foulkes and M. Neurath as ‘Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis’, in Neurath, O., Empiricism and Sociology, ed. Neurath, M. and Cohen, R. S. (Dordrecht: Reidel 1973), pp. 299–318.Google Scholar
Hahn, H.et al . (1931) ‘Diskussion zur Grundlegung der Mathematik’, Erkenntnis 2, pp. 135–49.Google Scholar
Haller, R. (1993) Neopositivismus: Eine historische Einführung in die Philosophie des Wiener Kreises (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Hands, W. (2001) (Reflection) without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanfling, O. (1996) ‘Logical Positivism’, in Shanker, S., ed., Philosophy of Science, Logic, and Mathematics in the Twentieth Century, Routledge History of Philosophy, vol. 9 (London: Routledge), pp. 193–213.Google Scholar
Hatfield, G. (1990) The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1952) The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason (Glencoe, IL: Free Press).Google Scholar
Heijenoort, J. (1967) ‘Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language’, Synthese 17, pp. 324–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heesch, M. (1999) Johann Friedrich Herbart zur Einführung (Hamburg: Junius).Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1852) ‘Über die Natur der menschlichen Sinnesempfindungen’, repr. in Helmholtz, H. v.Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, vol. 2 (Leipzig 1883: Barth), pp. 591–609.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1853) ‘Über Goethes naturwissenschaftliche Arbeiten’, repr. in Helmholtz, H. v., Vorträge und Reden, vol. 1 (Braunschweig 1903: Vieweg), pp. 1–24; translated as ‘On Goethe's Scientific Researches’ in Helmholtz, H. v., Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, ed. Cahan, D. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1995), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1855) ‘Über das Sehen des Menschen’, repr. in Helmholtz, H. v.Vorträge und Reden, vol. 1 (Braunschweig 1884: Vieweg), pp. 365–96.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1862) ‘Über das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaften zur Gesamtheit der Wissenschaften’, repr. in Helmholtz, H. v., Vorträge und Reden, vol. 1 (Braunschweig 1903: Vieweg), pp. 117–46; translated as ‘On the Relation of Natural Science to Science in General’, in Helmholtz, H. v., Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, ed. Cahan, D. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1995), pp. 76–95.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1870) ‘Über den Ursprung und die Bedeutung der geometrischen Axiome’, repr. in Helmholtz, H. v., Vorträge und Reden, vol. 2 (Braunschweig 1884: Vieweg), pp. 1–31; translated as ‘On the Origin and Significance of Geometrical Axioms’, in Helmholtz, H. v., Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, ed. Cahan, D. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1995), pp. 226–48.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1878a) ‘Die Tatsachen in der Wahrnehmung’, repr. in Helmholtz, H. v., Vorträge und Reden, vol. 2 (Braunschweig 1884: Vieweg), pp. 217–51; translated as ‘The Facts in Perception’, in Helmholtz, H. v., Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, ed. Cahan, D. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1995), pp. 342–80.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1878b) ‘Über den Ursprung und Sinn der geometrischen Sätze: Antwort gegen Herrn Professor Land’, repr. in Helmholtz, H. v., Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, vol. 2 (Leipzig 1883: Barth), pp. 640–62, translated as ‘The Origin and Meaning of Geometrical Axioms (II)’, in Mind 4 (1878), pp. 212–24.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1884) ‘Vorwort’ in Helmholtz, H. v., Vorträge und Reden, vol. 1 (Braunschweig 1884: Vieweg).Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1887) ‘Zählen und Messen’, repr. in Helmholtz (1921), pp. 70–97.
Helmholtz, H. v. (1892) ‘Goethes Vorahnungen kommender naturwissenschaftlicher Ideen’, in Vorträge und Reden, vol. 2 (Braunschweig 1903: Vieweg), pp. 337–61; translated as ‘Goethe's Presentiments of Coming Scientific Ideas’, in Helmholtz, H. v., Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, ed. Cahan, D. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press1995), pp. 393–412.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1896) Handbuch der physiologischen Optik, 2nd edn. (Hamburg: Voss).Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1921) Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie, ed. Hertz, P. and Schlick, M. (Berlin: Springer).Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1963) ‘Implications of Carnap's Work for the Philosophy of Science’, in Schilpp (1963), pp. 685–710.
Hepp, C. (1987) Avantgarde: Moderne Kunst, Kulturkritik und Reformbewegungen nach der Jahrhundertwende (Munich: dtv).Google Scholar
Herbart, J. F. (1813) Lehrbuch zur Einleitung in die Philosophie (repr. Hamburg: Meiner, 1993).Google Scholar
Hiebert, E. N. (1971) ‘The Energetics Controversy and the New Thermodynamics’, in D. H. D. Roller, ed., Perspectives in the History of Science and Technology (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press), pp. 67–86.
Hilbert, D. (1917) ‘Axiomatisches Denken’, repr. in Hilbert, D., Gesammelte Abhandlungen, vol. 3 (Berlin: Springer, 1935), pp. 146–56.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1924) ‘Die Grundlagen der Physik’, Mathematische Annalen 92, pp. 1–32, repr. in D. Hilbert, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, vol. 3 (Berlin: Springer, 1935), pp. 258–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, D. and Ackermann, W. (1928) Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik (Berlin: Springer).Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1990) ‘Quine as a Member of the Tradition of the Universality of Language’, in Barrett, R. and Gibson, R., eds., Perspectives on Quine (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 159–75.Google Scholar
Hönigswald, R. (1912) ‘Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff: Kritische Betrachtungen zu Ernst Cassirers gleichnamigem Werk’, Deutsche Literaturzeitung 33, cols. 2821–43 and 2885–902.Google Scholar
Hofstedter, R. (1963) Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (1947) Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente (Amsterdam: Querido) (repr. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981).Google Scholar
Hübinger, G. (1996a) ‘Der Verlag Eugen Diederichs in Jena: Wissenschaftskritik, Lebensreform und völkische Bewegung’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft 22, pp. 31–45.Google Scholar
Hübinger, G., ed. (1996b) Versammlungsort moderner Geister: Der Eugen Diederichs Verlag – Aufbruch ins Jahrhundert der Extreme (Munich: Diederichs).Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1900) Logische Untersuchungen, vol. 1: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik (Tübingen: Niemeyer).Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1911) ‘Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft’, Logos 1, pp. 289–341.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1913) Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1976).Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1936) Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie, (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1954).Google Scholar
Hylton, P. (1990) ‘Logic in Russell's Logicism’, in Bell, D. and Cooper, N., The Analytic Tradition: Meaning, Thought, and Knowledge (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 137–72.Google Scholar
Hylton, P. (1998) ‘Analysis and Analytic Philosophy’, in Biletzki, A. and Matar, A., eds., The Story of Analytic Philosophy (London: Routledge), pp. 209–28.Google Scholar
James, W. (1907) Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, in James, W.Pragmatism and Other Writings (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janich, P., ed. (1984) Methodische Philosophie: Beiträge zum Begründungsproblem der exakten Wissenschaften in Auseinandersetzung mit Hugo Dingler (Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut).Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1994) ‘Carnap's Voluntarism’, in Prawitz, D., Skyrms, B., and Westerståhl, D., eds., Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science IX (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 847–66.Google Scholar
Kaila, E. (1926) Die Prinzipien der Wahrscheinlichkeitslogik (Turku: Annales Universitatis Fennicae Aboensis).Google Scholar
Kaila, E. (1930) Der logische Neupositivismus: Eine kritische Studie (Turku: Annales Universitatis Fennicae Aboensis); trans. A. and P. Kirschenmann as Logistic Neopositivism. A Critical Study, in Kaila, E., Reality and Experience: Four Philosophical Essays, ed. Cohen, R. S. (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979), pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1783) Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können, ed. Vorländer, K., 5th edn (Hamburg: Meiner, 1913), trans. G. Hatfield as Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics That Will be Able to Come Forward as a Science, in Kant, I.Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, ed. Allison, H. and Heath, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 29–170.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1786) Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft, in Kant, I.Schriften zur Naturphilosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1977), trans. M. Friedman as Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, in Kant, I.Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, ed. Allison, H. and Heath, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 171–270.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1787) Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. Timmermann, J. (Hamburg 1998: Meiner); page references to 2nd (‘B’) edition according to pagination of Akademie-Ausgabe, trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood as Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1796) Von einem neuerdings erhobenen vornehmen Ton in der Philosophie, ed. Weischedel, W. (Suhrkamp 1958/1977: Frankfurt am Main), vol. 6, pp. 377–97; trans. P. Heath as On a Recently Prominent Tone of Superiority in Philosophy in Kant, I., Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, ed. Allison, H. and Heath, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 425–46.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, A. (1940) ‘Freude und Bereicherung durch Onkel Wilhelm’, in Wilhelm Dörpfeld (Berlin: Wilhelm-Dörpfeld-Stiftung), pp. 57–65.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, F. (1930) Das Unendliche in der Mathematik und seine Ausschaltung: Eine Untersuchung über die Grundlagen der Mathematik (Vienna: Deuticke).Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. I. and Fricke, (1997) Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998) Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1989) ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W. C., eds., Scientific Explanation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 410–505.Google Scholar
Klein, C. (2004) ‘Carnap on Categorical Concepts’, in Awodey and Klein (2004), pp. 291–312.
Köhnke, C. K. (1986) Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neukantianismus: Die deutsche Universitätsphilosophie zwischen Idealismus und Positivismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp); trans. R. J. Hollingdale as The Rise of Neo-Kantianism: German Academic Philosophy between Idealism and Positivism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Koenigsberger, L. (1895) Hermann v. Helmholtz's Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mathematik und Mechanik (Heidelberg: Hörning).Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, L. (1902–3) Hermann von Helmholtz, 3 vols. (vol. 1, 1902; vols. 2 and 3, 1903) (Braunschweig: Vieweg).Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1979) ‘A Puzzle about Belief’, in Margalit, A., ed., Meaning and Use (Dordrecht: Reidel).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronecker (1887) ‘Über den Zahlbegriff’, reworked and expanded in Hensel, K., ed., Werke, vol. 3 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1899), pp. 251–74.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Kuhn, T. S. (1977) ‘Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice’, in Kuhn, T. S., The Essential Tension (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 320–39.Google Scholar
Kuntze, F. (1912) ‘Zum Gedächtnis an Henri Poincaré’, Kant-Studien 17, pp. 337–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, J. (2006) ‘Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism’, Edge: The Third Culture, 30 June 2006 (www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier06/lanier06_index.html).Google Scholar
Langton, R. (1999) Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Laqueur, W. Z. (1962) Young Germany: A History of the German Youth Movement (New York: Basic Books).CrossRef
Leitgeb, H. (2007) ‘A New Analysis of Quasi-Analysis’, Journal of Philosophical Logic: 36, pp. 181–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitgeb, H. forthcoming ‘New Life for Carnap's Aufbau?’
Lenoir, T. (2006) ‘Operationalizing Kant: Manifolds, Models, and Mathematics in Helmholtz's Theory of Perception’, in Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A., eds., The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 142–210.Google Scholar
Levi, I. (1980) The Enterprise of Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Longino, H. (1995) ‘Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues’, Synthese 104, pp. 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2000) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. (1996) Mind and World, 2nd edn, with a new introduction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1905) Erkenntnis und Irrtum: Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung, repr. 1991 (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1912) Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung: Historisch-kritisch dargestellt, 7th edn. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1988).Google Scholar
Maher, P. forthcoming ‘Explication Defended’, Studia Logica.Google Scholar
Malament, D. (2002) ‘A No-Go Theorem about Rotation in Relativity Theory’, in Malament, D., ed., Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics in Honor of Howard Stein (LaSalle, IL: Open Court), pp. 267–93.Google Scholar
Mann, T. (1918) Betrachtungen eines Unpolitischen (Berlin: S. Fischer).Google Scholar
McLarty, C. (1997) ‘Poincaré: Mathematics & Logic & Intuition’, Philosophia Mathematica 5, pp. 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, D. (1982) Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information (New York: Freeman).Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1959) Toward a Systematic Pragmatics (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar
Messer, A. (1924) Die freideutsche Jugendbewegung: Ihr Verlauf von 1913 bis 1922 (Langensalza: Beyer).Google Scholar
Miles, M. (2006) ‘Kant's “Copernican Revolution”: Toward Rehabilitation of a Concept and Provision of a Framework for the Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason ’, Kant-Studien 97, pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mises, R. (1928) Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik und Wahrheit (Vienna: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mises, R. (1939) Kleines Lehrbuch des Positivismus: Einführung in die empiristische Wissenschaftsauffassung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1990).Google Scholar
Monk, R. (1990) Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius (London: Cape).Google Scholar
Mormann, T. (2000) Rudolf Carnap (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar
Mormann, T. (2001) ‘Carnaps Philosophie als Möglichkeitswissenschaft’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 55, pp. 79–100.Google Scholar
Mormann, T. (2006) ‘Werte bei Carnap’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 60, pp. 169–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1938) Foundation of the Theory of Signs (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
Musil, R. (1912) ‘Profil eines Programms’, in Musil, R., Prosa und Stücke, Kleine Prosa, Aphorismen, Autobiographisches, Essays und Reden, Kritik (Hamburg: Rowohlt, 2000), pp. 1315–19.Google Scholar
Musil, R. (1913a) ‘Der mathematische Mensch’, repr. in Musil, R., Prosa und Stücke, Kleine Prosa, Aphorismen, Autobiographisches, Essays und Reden, Kritik (Hamburg: Rowohlt, 2000), pp. 1004–8.Google Scholar
Musil, R. (1913b) ‘Analyse und Synthese’, repr. in Musil, R., Prosa und Stücke, Kleine Prosa, Aphorismen, Autobiographisches, Essays und Reden, Kritik (Hamburg: Rowohlt, 2000), pp. 1008–9.Google Scholar
Musil, R. (1931) Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften (Hamburg: Rowohlt, new edn 1978); trans. S. Wilkins as The Man without Qualities (New York: Knopf, 1995).Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1901a) ‘Zu den logischen Grundlagen der neueren Mathematik’, Archiv für systematische Philosophie 7, pp. 177–209 (Parts I and II), 372–84 (Part III).Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1901b) ‘Zur Frage der logischen Methode’, Kant-Studien 6, pp. 270–83.Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1904) Logik: Grundlegung und logischer Aufbau der Mathematik und mathematische Naturwissenschaft (Marburg: Elwert).Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1909) ‘Über Philosophie und philosophisches Studium’, in Natorp, P., Philosophie und Pädagogik: Untersuchungen auf ihrem Grenzgebiet (Marburg: Elwert), pp. 209–96.Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1910) Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1912) Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritischer Methode (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck).
Natorp, P. (1921) Platos Ideenlehre: Eine Einführung in den Idealismus, 2nd edn (Hamburg: Meiner).Google Scholar
Neiman, S. (1994) The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1996) Language in Cognitive Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, L. (1906) ‘Vorwort’, Abhandlungen der Fries'schen Schule, Neue Folge 1, pp. III–Ⅻ.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (1999) The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Neurath, O. (1928) ‘Rezension: R. Carnap, Der logische Aufbau der Welt und Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie ’, Der Kampf 21, pp. 624–6.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. (1932) ‘Protokollsätze’, Erkenntnis 3, pp. 204–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, O. (1934) ‘Radikaler Physikalismus und “wirkliche Welt”’, Erkenntnis 4, pp. 346–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, N. S. and Huttenlocher, J. (2000) Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Newton, I. (1687) Principia Mathematica Philosophiae Naturalis, trans. A. Motte (repr. Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. (1717) Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light (repr. New York: Dover, 1952).Google Scholar
Noll, R. (1994) The Jung Cult: Origins of a Charismatic Movement (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Norton, J. (2003) ‘Causation as Folk Science’, Philosopher's Imprint, 3, no. 4.Google Scholar
Norton, J. (forthcoming) ‘Do the Causal Principles of Modern Physics Contradict Causal Anti-Fundamentalism?’, in Machamer, P. K. and Wolters, G., eds., Causality: Historical and Contemporary (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
O'Neill, J. and Uebel, (2004) ‘Horkheimer and Neurath: Restarting a Disrupted Debate’, European Journal of Philosophy 12, pp. 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostwald, W. (1895) Die Überwindung des wissenschaftlichen Materialismus (Leipzig: Veit).
Ostwald, W. (1905) ‘Zur Theorie der Wissenschaft’, Annalen der Naturphilosophie 4, 1–27.Google Scholar
Ostwald, W. (1908) Grundriß der Naturphilosophie (Leipzig: Reclam).Google Scholar
Ostwald, W. (1914a) Auguste Comte: Der Mann und sein Werk (Leipzig: Unesma).Google Scholar
Ostwald, W. (1914b) ‘Vorrede’, to Comte (1822), pp. VII–Ⅺ.
Ostwald, W. (1914c) Moderne Naturphilosophie: I. Die Ordnungswissenschaften (Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Paetzold, H. (1995) Ernst Cassirer – Von Marburg nach New York: Eine philosophische Biographie (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Parrini, P., Salmon, W. C. and Salmon, M. H., eds. (2003) Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
Pincock, C. (2002) ‘Russell's Influence on Carnap's Aufbau ’, Synthese 131, pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, J. von (1994) Creating Modern Probability: Its Mathematics, Physics and Philosophy in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Planck, M. (1896) ‘Gegen die Neuere Energetik’, Annalen der Physik und Chemie 57, pp. 72–8.
Poincaré, H. (1902) La Science et l'Hypothèse (repr. Paris: Flammarion, 1968).Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1904) Wissenschaft und Hypothese [German translation of Poincaré (1902)], trans. with commentary F. and L. Lindemann (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1913) The Value of Science, trans. G. B. Halstead (New York: Dover).Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1914) Science and Method, trans. F. Maitland, with a preface by B. Russell (repr. Bristol: Thoemmes, 1996).Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1935) Logik der Forschung (Vienna: Springer); trans. K. R. Popper as The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson, 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1963) ‘The Demarcation between Science and Metaphysics’, in Schilpp (1963), pp. 183–226.
Proops, I. (2001a) ‘The New Wittgenstein: A Critique’, European Journal of Philosophy 9, pp. 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, I. (2001b) ‘Logical Syntax in the Tractatus ’, in Gaskin, R., ed., Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy (London: Routledge), pp. 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (1981) Reason, Truth, and History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1936) ‘Truth by Convention’, repr. in The Ways of Paradox and other Essays, rev. and enl. edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 77–106.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1951) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, repr. in W. V. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View (New York: Harper, 1953), pp. 20–46.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1960) Word and Object (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1963) ‘Carnap and Logical Truth’, repr. in Quine (1976), pp. 107–32.
Quine, W. V. O. (1969) Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1970) Philosophy of Logic (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1974) The Roots of Reference (LaSalle, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V.O (1976) The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1978) ‘On the Nature of Moral Values’, repr. in Theories and Things (Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1981), pp. 55–66.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1984) ‘Carnap's Positivistic Travail’, Fundamenta Scientiae 5, pp. 325–33.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1987) Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1990) ‘Comment on Hintikka’, in Barrett, R. and Gibson, R., eds., Perspectives on Quine (Oxford: Blackwell), p. 176.Google Scholar
Ram, A. and Moorman, (1999) Understanding Language Understanding: Computational Models of Reading (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1995) ‘Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas’, Journal of Philosophy 92, pp. 132–80.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1996) Political Liberalism, 2nd edn (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Reck, E. (1997) ‘Frege's Influence on Wittgenstein: Reversing Metaphysics via the Context Principle’, in Tait, W. W., ed., Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein: Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky (LaSalle, IL: Open Court), pp. 123–86.Google Scholar
Reck, E. and Awodey, (2005) Frege's Lectures on Logic: Carnap's Jena Notes 1910–1914 (LaSalle, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1913) ‘Die Militarisierung der deutschen Jugend’, Die freie Schulgemeinde 3, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1916) Der Begriff der Wahrscheinlichkeit für die mathematische Darstellung der Wirklichkeit (Leipzig: Ambrosius Barth).Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1920) Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori (Berlin: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1925) Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre (Braunschweig: Vieweg).Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1928) Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre (Berlin: de Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1929) ‘Ziele und Wege der physikalischen Erkenntnis’, in Handbuch der Physik, vol. 4: Allgemeine Grundlagen der Physik (Berlin: Springer), pp. 1–80.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1930) ‘Kausalität und Wahrscheinlichkeit’, Erkenntnis 1, pp. 158–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1938) Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1951) The Rise of Scientific Philosophy (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Reisch, G. (1991) ‘Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism?’, Philosophy of Science 58, pp. 264–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisch, G. (2005) How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, A. W. (1998) Carnap's Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Richardson, A. W. (2007) ‘Carnapian Pragmatism’, in Creath, R. and Friedman, M., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Carnap (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Rickert, H. (1921) System der Philosophie (Tübingen: Mohr).Google Scholar
Ricketts, T. (1994) ‘Carnap's Principle of Tolerance, Empiricism, and Conventionalism’, in Clark, P. and Hale, B., eds., Reading Putnam (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 176–200.Google Scholar
Ricketts, T. (1996) ‘Pictures, Logic, and the Limits of Sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus ’, in Sluga, H. and Stern, D., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 59–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricketts, T. (2004a) ‘Languages and Calculi’, in Hardcastle, G. L. and Richardson, A. W., eds., Logical Empiricism in North America, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 18 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 257–80.Google Scholar
Ricketts, T. (2004b) ‘Frege, Carnap, and Quine: Continuities and Discontinuities’, in Awodey and Klein (2004), pp. 181–202.
Riehl, A. (1904) ‘Helmholtz in seinem Verhältnis zu Kant’, Kant-Studien 9, pp. 261–85.Google Scholar
Rohden, G. (1940) ‘Wilhelm Dörpfeld’, in Wilhelm Dörpfeld (Berlin: Wilhelm-Dörpfeld-Stiftung), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1967) ‘Introduction’, in Rorty, R., ed., The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1998) ‘Against Unity’, Wilson Quarterly, pp. 28–38.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1897) An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) (repr. London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1903) The Principles of Mathematics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1912) The Problems of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1914a) Our Knowledge of the External World as a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy (LaSalle, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1914b) ‘The Relation of Sense-Data to Physics’, Scientia, repr. in Mysticism and Logic (London: Longmans, 1918), pp. 145–79.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1919) Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1922) ‘Introduction’ to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, repr. in L. Wittgenstein, Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung, ed. M. McGuinness and J. Schulte (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 258–86.
Salmon, W. (1994) ‘Comment: Carnap on Realism’, in W. Salmon and G. Wolters, eds., Logic, Language, and the Structure of Scientific Theories: Proceedings of the Carnap-Reichenbach Centennial, University of Konstanz, 21–24 May 1991 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press), pp. 279–86.
Sanger, L. (2006) ‘The New Politics of Knowledge’Digital Universe Blog, 31 July 2006 (www.dufoundation.org/blog/?m=200607).Google Scholar
Schilpp, P., ed. (1963) The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (LaSalle, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar
Schlick, M. (1911) Review of Natorp (1910), Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie und Soziologie 35, pp. 254–60.Google Scholar
Schlick, M. (1918) Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre (Berlin: Springer).Google Scholar
Schlotter, S. (2004) Die Totalität der Kultur: Philosophisches Denken und politisches Handeln bei Bruno Bauch (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann).Google Scholar
Sengoopta, C. (2000) Otto Weininger: Sex, Science, and Self in Imperial Vienna (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Sher, G. (1999) ‘Is There a Place for Philosophy in Quine's Theory?’, Journal of Philosophy 96, pp. 491–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. (2001) ‘The Newtonian Style in Book II of the Principia ’, in Buchwald, J. Z. and Cohen, I. B., eds., Isaac Newton's Natural Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 249–98.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (2002a) ‘From the Phenomenon of the Ellipse to an Inverse-Square Force: Why Not?’, in Malament, D., ed., Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics (LaSalle, IL: Open Court), pp. 31–70.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (2002b) ‘The Methodology of the Principia ’, in Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Newton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 138–73.Google Scholar
Soames, S. (2003) Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Vol. 1: The Dawn of Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Stadler, F. (1997) Studien zum Wiener Kreis: Ursprung, Entwicklung und Wirkung des logischen Empirismus im Kontext (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp), trans. Camilla Nielson et al. as The Vienna Circle: Studies in the Origins, Development, and Influence of Logical Empiricism (Vienna: Springer, 2001).Google Scholar
Staiger, E. (1949) Goethe, vol. 1 (Zurich: Atlantis).Google Scholar
Stein, H. (1958) ‘An Examination of Some Aspects of Natural Science’ diss. University of Chicago.
Stein, H. (1967) ‘Newtonian Space-Time’, The Texas Quarterly 10, pp. 174–200, repr. in Palter, R., ed., The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970), pp. 258–84.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (1988) ‘Logos, Logic, and Logistiké : Some Philosophical Remarks on the Nineteenth-Century Transformation of Mathematics’, in Asprey, W. and Kitcher, P., eds., History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 238–59.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (1989) ‘Yes, but … Some Skeptical Remarks on Realism and Anti-Realism’, Dialectica 43, pp. 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H. (1990) ‘On Locke, “the Great Huygenius, and the incomparable Mr. Newton”’, in Bricker, P. and Hughes, R. I. G., eds., Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science (Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press), pp. 17–48.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (1992) ‘Was Carnap Entirely Wrong, After All?’, Synthese 93, pp. 275–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H. (1993) ‘On Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century’, in French, P. A., Uehling, T. E., and Wettstein, H. K., eds., Midwest Studies in Philosophy XVIII: Philosophy of Science (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 177–201.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (1994) ‘Some Reflections on the Structure of Our Knowledge in Physics’, in Prawitz, D., Skyrms, B., and Westerståhl, D., eds., Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science IX (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 633–55.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (2002) ‘Newton's Metaphysics’, in Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Newton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 256–307.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (2004) ‘The Enterprise of Understanding and the Enterprise of Knowledge’, Synthese 140, pp. 135–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, S. (1983) From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case against Belief (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1996) Deconstructing the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2003) Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Strong, T. B. and F. A. Sposito (1995) ‘Habermas's Significant Other’, in White, S. K., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 263–88.Google Scholar
Surowiecki, J. (2004) The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations (New York: Doubleday).Google Scholar
Tait, W. W. (1986) ‘Truth and Proof: The Platonism of Mathematics’, Synthese 69, pp. 341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, W. W. (1997) ‘Frege versus Cantor and Dedekind: On the Concept of Number’, in Tait, W. W., ed., Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky (LaSalle, IL: Open Court), pp. 213–48.Google Scholar
Tait, W. W. (2001) ‘Beyond the Axioms: The Question of Objectivity in Mathematics’, Philosophia Mathematica 9, pp. 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappenden, J. (2006) ‘The Riemannian Background to Frege's Philosophy’, in Gray, J. and Ferreirós, J., eds., The Architecture of Modern Mathematics: Essays in History and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Tenorth, H.-E. (2003) ‘Schulmänner, Volkslehrer und Unterrichtsbeamte: Friedrich Adolph Wilhelm Diesterweg, Friedrich Wilhelm Dörpfeld, Friedrich Dittes’, in Tenorth, H.-E., ed., Klassiker der Pädagogik, vol. 1: Von Erasmus bis Helene Lange (Munich: Beck), pp. 224–45.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999) The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Toretti, R. (1978) ‘Hugo Dingler's Philosophy of Geometry’, Dialogos 32, pp. 85–128.Google Scholar
Tyson, K. (1995) New Foundations for Scientific Social and Behavioral Research: The Heuristic Paradigm (Boston: Allyn & Bacon).Google Scholar
Uebel, T. E. (1992a) Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence Debate (Amsterdam: Rodopi).Google Scholar
Uebel, T. E. (1992b) ‘Rational Reconstruction as Elucidation? Carnap in the Early Protocol Sentence Debate’, Synthese 93, pp. 107–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uebel, T. E. (1998) ‘Enlightenment and the Vienna Circle's Scientific World-Conception’, in Rorty, A. O., ed., Philosophers on Education; Historical Perspectives (London: Routledge), pp. 418–38.Google Scholar
Uebel, T. E. (2001) ‘Carnap and Neurath in Exile: Can their Disputes Be Resolved?’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15, pp. 211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uebel, T. E. (2004) ‘Carnap, the Left Vienna Circle, and Neopositivist Antimetaphysics’, in Awodey and Klein (2004), pp. 243–74.
Ulbricht, J. H. and Werner, , (1999) Romantik, Revolution and Reform: Der Eugen Diederichs Verlag im Epochenkontext 1900–1949 (Göttingen: Wallstein).Google Scholar
Urmson, J. O. (1956) Philosophical Analysis: Its Development between the Two World Wars (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Vaihinger, H. (1922) Die Philosophie des Als Ob: System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus, 8th edn (Leipzig: Meiner).Google Scholar
Verley, X. (2003) Carnap, le symbolique et la philosophie (Paris: L'Harmattan).Google Scholar
Jan, Vries (1976) The Economy of Europe in an Age of Crisis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Waismann, F. (1930) ‘Logische Analyse des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs’, Erkenntnis 1, pp. 228–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waismann, F., ed. (1967) Wittgenstein und der Wiener Kreis (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wang, H. (1987) Reflections on Kurt Gödel (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Werner, M. (1996) ‘Die Erfindung einer Tradition: Der Verleger Eugen Diederichs als “kultureller Reichsgründer”’, in Ehrlich, L. and John, J., eds., Weimar 1930: Politik und Kultur im Vorfeld der NS -Diktatur (Weimer: Böhlau 1998), pp. 261–74.Google Scholar
Werner, M. (2003) Moderne in der Provinz: Kulturelle Experimente im Fin de Siècle Jena (Göttingen: Wallstein).Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. (1985) Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Weyl, H. (1926) Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft (Munich: Oldenbourg).Google Scholar
Wilson, C. H. (1984) England's Apprenticeship, 1603–1763 (London: Longmans).Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1998) ‘Resuming the Enlightenment Quest’, Wilson Quarterly 22, pp. 16–27.Google Scholar
Windelband, W. (1894) ‘Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft’, repr. in Präludien: Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, 6th edn (Tübingen: Mohr, 1919, pp. 137–60.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus repr. in L. Wittgenstein Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung, ed. B. McGuinness and J. Schulte (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998), pp. 1–178.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1980) Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge 1930–32, from the notes of John, King and Desmond, Lee, ed. King, J. (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Little-field).Google Scholar
Wolin, R. (2004) The Seduction of Unreason: The Intellectual Romance with Fascism from Nietzsche to Postmodernism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Wolters, G. (2004) ‘Styles in Philosophy: The Case of Carnap’, in Awodey and Klein (2004), pp. 25–39.
Zabell, S. L. (2005) Symmetry and its Discontents: Essays on the History of Inductive Probability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar