Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-4wks4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-28T19:45:24.202Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Suraiya N. Faroqhi
Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi
Kate Fleet
Newnham College, Cambridge
Get access


Of the Ottoman Empire we can say what Friedrich Schiller (1759–1805) once wrote about the seventeenth-century military commander and entrepreneur Albrecht von Wallenstein (in Czech, Albrecht Václav Eusebius z Valdštejna, 1583–1634). According to Schiller’s verse, the favour and hate of [conflicting] parties had caused confusion, producing a highly variable image of Wallenstein’s character in history. Put differently, it was the diverging perspectives of the beholders that gave rise to this instability. Admittedly, being a poet, Schiller made his point far more concisely than the present author is able to do.

In certain traditions of historiography in the Balkans and elsewhere as well, denigrating the Ottoman Empire and making it responsible for all manner of “backwardness” is still widespread, although challenges to this view have been mounting during the last 30 years. On the other hand, romanticising the images of Mehmed the Conqueror (r. 1451–81) or Süleyman the Magnificent (r. 1520–66) is also quite a popular enterprise: witness the statue of Mehmed II in downtown Istanbul – a new one is in the planning stage – and the double monument to Zrínyi Miklós and Sultan Süleyman in a park of Szigetvar, Hungary.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


‘Von der Parteien Hass und Gunst verwirrt, schwankt sein Charakterbild in der Geschichte’. See Wallensteins Lager, Prologue, in Friedrich Schiller, Sämtliche Werke, 3 vols. (Munich, 1962)
Inalcik, Halil and Murphey, Rhoads, Tursun Bey’s History of Mehmed the Conqueror (Chicago and Minneapolis, 1978)Google Scholar
Uzluk, Feridun Nafız, Fatih Devrinde Karaman Eyaleti Vakıfları Fihristi (Ankara, 1958)Google Scholar
Köprülü, Fuat, Türk Edebiyatı’nda İlk Mutasavvıflar, 2nd ed. (Ankara, 1966)Google Scholar
Kafadar, Cemal, Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1995)Google Scholar
Halil, Mükrimin [Yinanç], ‘Ferīdūn Beg Münshe’ātı’’, in Tarih-i Osmani Encümeni Mecmuası, XI–XIII, 771336–9/1920–3, pp. 161–8, XIV n.s. 1 (78) (1340/1924), 37–46, XIV n.s. 2 (79) (1340/1924), 95–104, XIV n.s. 4 (81), 216–26
Soucek, Svat, Piri Reis and Turkish Mapmaking after Columbus: The Khalili Portolan Atlas (London, 1992)Google Scholar
Skilliter, Susan, William Harborne and the Trade with Turkey, 1578–1582 (London and Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar
Dalsar, Fahri, Türk Sanayi ve Ticaret Tarihinde Bursa’da İpekçilik (Istanbul, 1960)Google Scholar
Hanna, Nelly, Making Big Money in 1600: The Life and Times of Isma’il Abu Taqiyya, Egyptian Merchant (Syracuse, N.Y., 1998)Google Scholar
Peirce, Leslie, The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire (New York and Oxford, 1993)Google Scholar
Kuran, Aptullah, Sinan, the Grand Old Master of Ottoman Architecture (Washington, D. C., and Istanbul, 1987)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Oliver Jens, Skanderbeg: Der neue Alexander auf dem Balkan (Ratisbon, 2009)Google Scholar
Orhonlu, Cengiz, Osmanlı İmparatorluğunun Güney Siyaseti, Habeş Eyaleti (Istanbul, 1974)Google Scholar
Louhichi, Soumaya, Das Verhältnis zwischen der osmanischen Zentralgewalt und der Provinz Tunesien: Versuch einer zusammenhängenden Deutung der osmanischen Herrschaft in Tunesien während des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts (Saarbrücken, 2008)Google Scholar
Pia Pedani, Maria (ed.), Inventory of the Lettere e Scritture Turchesche in the Venetian State Archives, Based on the Materials Compiled by Alessio Bombaci (Leiden, 2010)
Lowry, Heath, ‘Changes in Fifteenth-Century Ottoman Peasant Taxation: The Case Study of Radilofo (Radolibos)’, in Continuity and Change in Late Byzantine and Early Ottoman Society, ed. Anthony Bryer and Heath Lowry (Birmingham and Washington, D. C., 1986)Google Scholar
Bono, Salvatore, Schiavi musulmani nell’ Italia moderna, Galeotti, vu’ cumprà, domestici (Naples, 1999)Google Scholar
Bostan, İdris, Adriyatik’te Korsanlık – Osmanlılar, Uskoklar, Venedikliler, 1575–1620 (Istanbul, 2009)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats