Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T21:18:06.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

43 - Boethius

from VII - The third encounter of Christianity with ancient Greek philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2011

Lloyd Gerson
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

LIFE AND WORKS

Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius was descended from an established Roman elite. His date of birth is unknown but must have been c. 480, perhaps as early as 475. His father, (? Narius) Manlius Boethius (cos. 487), came from a line that may have had its origins in the East, while his maternal lineage too went back to the Gens Anicia, which had converted to Christianity in the fourth century. Boethius himself was named Consul in 510, the Consulship being one of only two securely datable facts concerning his public life. He evidently lost his parents, or his father, when still young and was adopted by Q. Aurelius Memmius Symmachus (cos. 485), a descendant of Q. Aurelius Symmachus (cos. 391). Although the details of Boethius’ education remain obscure, we may be certain that Symmachus had a controlling hand in shaping it. At Variae 1.45.3 Cassiodorus mentions Boethius’ having ‘entered far away the school of the Athenians’ (Atheniensium scholas longe positus introisti), which, as Courcelle observed, probably indicates only that Boethius intellectually ‘enrolled’ in the school despite the distance from Athens. Courcelle alternatively proposed that Boethius studied under Ammonius in Alexandria, but his thesis is seriously undermined by the texts he adduced in support of it. Boethius’ commentaries are not mere copies of Ammonius’, and even if they were, to demonstrate that Boethius actually studied in Alexandria would be an entirely different matter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Analytica priora, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1962). AL 3.1–2, Leiden.
Asztalos, M. (1993) ‘Boethius as a Transmitter of Greek Logic to the Latin West: The Categories’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95:Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. (2003) ‘Boèce et le Timée’, in Galonnier (2003).Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002) ‘A Greek Parallel to Boethius’ De hypotheticis syllogismis’, Mnemosyne 55:Google Scholar
Brandt, S. (1903) ‘Entstehungszeit und zeitliche Folge der Werke von Boethius’, Philologus 62 (n.F. 16):, 234–75.Google Scholar
Categoriae vel Praedicamenta, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1961). AL 1.1–2, Bruges–Paris.
Chadwick, H. (1981) Boethius: The Consolations of Music, Logic, Theology and Philosophy. Oxford.
Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Hermēneias, ed. Meiser, C., 2 vols. (1877, 1880). Leipzig.
Courcelle, P. (1969) Late Latin Writers and their Greek Sources, tr. Harry E. Wedeck, French edition 2. Cambridge, MA.
De arithmetica, eds. Oosthout, H. and Schilling, J. (1999). CCSL 94A.2. Turnhout.
De consolatione philosophiae, Opuscula theologica, ed. Moreschini, C., 2nd edn (2005). Munich–Leipzig.
De divisione, ed. Magee, J. (1998). Leiden–Boston–Cologne.
De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. Obertello, L. (1969). Brescia.
De institutione musica, ed. Friedlein, G. (1867). Leipzig.
De interpretatione vel Periermenias, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1965). AL 2.1, Bruges–Paris.
De sophisticis elenchis, ed. Dod, G. B. (1975). AL 6.1, Leiden–Brussels.
De syllogismo categorico, ed. Thörnqvist, C. Thomsen (2008). Gothenburg.
De syllogismo categorico, ed. Thörnqvist, C. Thomsen (2008). Gothenburg.
De topicis differentiis, ed. Nikitas, D. Z. (1990). Athens–Paris–Brussels.
DeRijk, L. M. (1964) ‘On the Chronology of Boethius’Works on Logic I, II’, Vivarium 2:, 125–62.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) ‘Analyzing Syllogisms or Anonymus Aurelianensis III – The (Presumably) Earliest Extant Latin Commentary on the Prior Analytics, and its Greek Model’, Cahiers de l’Institut du moyen-âge grec et latin (Copenhagen) 37:Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1990) ‘Boethius as an Aristotelian Commentator’, in Sorabji, (1990).
Flamant, J. (1977) Macrobe et le néo-platonisme latin, à la fin du ive siècle. études Préliminaires aux Religions Orientales dans l’Empire Romain 28. Leiden.
Folkerts, M. (1970) Boethius’ Geometrie II: Ein mathematisches Lehrbuch des Mittelalters. Texte und Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der exakten Wissenschaften 9. Wiesbaden.
Fuhrmann, M. and Gruber, J. (eds.) (1984) Boethius. Wege der Forschung 483. Darmstadt.
Galonnier, A. (ed.) (2003) Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs: Actes du colloque international de la Fondation Singer-Polignac: Paris, 8–12 juin 1999. Philosophes médiévaux 44. Louvain-la-Neuve–Leuven–Paris.
Galonnier, A. (ed.) (2007) Boèce: Opuscula sacra I: Capita dogmatica (Traités II, III, IV). Philosophes médiévaux 47. Louvain-la-Neuve–Leuven–Paris.
Gersh, S. (1986) Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition, 2 vols. Notre Dame.
Gruber, J. (1997–8) ‘Boethius 1925–1998 I, II’, Lustrum 39: ; 40: 199–259.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. (2006) Kommentar zu Boethius, De consolatione philosophiae. Texte und Kommentare 9, 2nd edn. Berlin–New York.
Hadot, P. (1971) Marius Victorinus: Recherches sur sa vie et ses oeuvres. Paris.
Hadot, P. (1999) Plotin, Porphyre: études néoplatoniciennes. Paris.
Hadot, P. (1971) Marius Victorinus: Recherches sur sa vie et ses oeuvres, vol. II, Porphyre et Victorinus. Paris.
Hadot, P. (1959) ‘Un fragment du commentaire perdu de Boèce sur les Catégories d’Aristote dans le codex Bernensis 363’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 26. (Repr. in Hadot (1999) 383–410.)Google Scholar
Heilman, A. (2007) Boethius’ Musiktheorie und das Quadrivium. Göttingen.
In Isagogen Porphyrii commenta, ed. Brandt, S. (1906). CSEL 48.1. Vienna–Leipzig.
Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos, ed. Thörnqvist, C. Thomsen (2008). Gothenburg.
Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos, ed. Thörnqvist, C. Thomsen (2008). Gothenburg.
Karamanolis, G. E. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford.
Klingner, F. (1921) De Boethii consolatione philosophiae. Philologische Untersuchungen 27. Berlin.
Magee, J. (1989) Boethius on Signification and Mind. Philosophia Antiqua 52. Leiden–New York–Copenhagen–Cologne.
Magee, J. (2003) ‘Boethius’ Anapestic Dimeters (Acatalectic), with Regard to the Structure and Argument of the Consolatio’, in Galonnier, (2003)..
Magee, J. (ed.) (1998) Boethius, De divisione. Philosophia Antiqua 77. Leiden–Boston–Cologne.Google Scholar
Magee, J. (2005) ‘Boethius’ Consolatio and the Theme of Roman Liberty’, Phoenix 59:Google Scholar
Magee, J. (2007) ‘Boethius, Last of the Romans’, Carmina Philosophiae 16..Google Scholar
Magee, J. (2010) ‘On the Composition and Sources of Boethius’ Second Peri Hermeneias Commentary’, Vivarium 48:Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2003) Boethius. Oxford.
Marenbon, J. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Cambridge.
Marenbon, John (2003) Boethius. Oxford.
Moorhead, J. (1992) Theoderic in Italy. Oxford.
Moreschini, C. (2003a) Varia Boethiana. Naples.
Nash-Marshall, S. (2000) Participation and the Good: A Study in Boethian Metaphysics. New York.
O’Daly, G. (1991) The Poetry of Boethius. London.
Obertello, L. (1974) Severino Boezio, 2 vols. Genoa.
Porphyrii Isagoge, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1966). AL 1.6, Bruges–Paris.
Reiss, E. (1982) Boethius. Boston, MA.
Relihan, J.C. (2007) The Prisoner’s Philosophy: Life and Death in Boethius’s Consolation. Notre Dame, IN.
Scheible, H. (1972) Die Gedichte in der Consolatio Philosophiae des Boethius. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften n.F. 46. Heidelberg.
Schmidt-Kohl, V. (1965) Die neuplatonische Seelenlehre in der Consolatio Philosophiae des Boethius. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 16. Meisenheim am Glan.
Shiel, J. (1990) ‘Boethius’ Commentaries on Aristotle’, in Sorabji, (1990).
Smith, A. (ed.) (1993) Porphyrii Philosophi Fragmenta. Stuttgart–Leipzig.
Smith, A. (1993) ‘Iamblichus’ Views on the Relationship of Philosophy to Religion in De Mysteriis’, in Blumenthal, H. J. and Clark, E. G. (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus. London.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (1990) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence. Ithaca, NY.
Speca, A. (2001) Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic. Philosophia Antiqua 87. Leiden–Boston–Cologne.
Topica, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1969). AL 5.1–2, Brussels–Paris.
Tränkle, H. (1977) ‘Ist die “Philosophiae consolatio” des Boethius zum vorgesehenen Abschluss gelangt?’, Vigiliae Christianae 31: (Repr. in Fuhrmann and Gruber (1984) 311–19.)Google Scholar
Troncarelli, F. (2005) Cogitatio mentis: L’eredità di Boezio nell’Alto Medioevo. Storie e Testi 16. Naples.
Usener, H. (1877) Anecdoton Holderi: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte Roms in ostgothischer Zeit. Bonn. Repr. Hildesheim and New York, (1969).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Boethius
  • Edited by Lloyd Gerson, University of Toronto
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
  • Online publication: 28 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194846.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Boethius
  • Edited by Lloyd Gerson, University of Toronto
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
  • Online publication: 28 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194846.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Boethius
  • Edited by Lloyd Gerson, University of Toronto
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
  • Online publication: 28 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194846.015
Available formats
×